Thursday, July 19, 2018

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 11 updates in 10 topics

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 10:22PM -0400

Hello....
 
Read this:
 
 
My wisdom of today
 
You know me more now that i am a white arab, and you know me more
by my philosophy and political philosophy and you know me more
by my poems, and you know me more by my software projects(because
i am a more serious computer programmer)
 
 
So like in philosophy, i will ask a question:
 
How can you love this life ?
 
You have to be like "philosophy", you have to notice that the
big advantage of life is that it has given the perfection that
we notice today, such as computer programming and science and
technology, and you have to prioritize to be able to succeed
in your thinking, so you have to give a high priority to this
"perfection" that you notice ! and when you will give it a high priority
you will be able, like a scientist, to appreciate and to love this
perfection of computer programming or perfection of science or
technology, so if you want to love this life, you have to love this
perfection ! our God is like this perfection ! this is my wisdom of today !
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 09:32PM -0400

Hello,,
 
 
Read this:
 
 
Read again, I correct a typo, because i think fast and i write fast..
 
I explain more my poem bellow...
 
My poem bellow is full of wisdom, my poem bellow is like philosophy, i
will explain it to you more, because it's really smart !
 
As you have noticed i said in poem (Iook at it bellow), that:
 
"Because time is like a balance
Because time is perfection"
 
 
I explain:
 
Because capitalism is like a "balance" and life is like a balance ,
because we are like balancing to attain a stability or reliability,
we are balancing with causes and consequences and we are balancing with
perfections and imperfections so that to be "perfection" and we are
balancing with weaknesses and strongnesses so that to be "perfection"
, because morality is perfection at best or excellence
at best or quality at best ! this is why in my poem bellow i said that
"time is perfection" because time that is a "balance" has given us the
perfection of "consciousness", and consciousness is like reliability so
it is morality, and this "balance" knows about the reference of measure
that is stability and reliability, this is why this balance is a "scale"
that permits us to measure and since this balance is also perfection so
this perfection has created "consciousness" , this is why i say in my
bellow poem the following:
 
"Since the scale creates consciousness
Because the scale creates abundance"
 
Because the scale is this balance that is also perfection !
 
So you have to be smart to understand my poem !
 
Also i said the following about my poem bellow:
 
About the wisdom of my poems..
 
You will notice that my poems are like "wisdom", or like philosophy,
also because i am in reality a "gentleman" type of person, and i am
in reality like a "wise" type of person, and my poems are "smart" !
so i continu to explain to you my poems, as you have notice i have
posted one of my poem in my last post and i have explained it to you
more, you can read it bellow, you will notice also that
this poem is smart, because like my wisdom bellow
it get "out" you from "idealism" without getting into
pessimism and violence, because i have talked about idealism of racism
of neo-nazism or idealism of socialism and i have explained that
they are "not" correct morality, and i have explained to you what
is morality also, so thus notice in my poem bellow
that i am saying that "perfection" that has an essence "solving"
problems, because i think we say we are perfection and reliable if we
can solve problems, and if we are xcapable of solving all the problems
we wsay that we are absolute perfection or complete realiability, so
morality also is contineous perfection as i have explained, so notice
with me that in my poem bellow i said that perfection is also
"diversity" or perfection is also "darkness" of weakness or suffering,
and i said that perfection is also the strong that needs the weak and
weak that needs the strong, and i said also also in my poem that:
 
"But the weak becomes better
Because our civilization is not a decoy"
 
 
So as you have noticed my poem is smart because in my poem i am getting
out of idealism without being pessimism and violence, this is why i have
said the following on one of my previous post:
 
 
My wisdom of today..
 
A better politics..
 
Now you know me more by my writings, and now i will give you an
important wisdom:
 
One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:
 
Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being
pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence.
 
My other wisdom of today is:
 
A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with a minimum brute force to score and to succeed.
 
 
This is why i told you before another wisdom by saying the following:
 
Violence is "easy" today, so destruction is easy, but "wisdom"
is to know how to transcend our living conditions by being
discipline of technology and science and by being sophistication
of technology and science and by being wisdom that knows
how to guide our world and humanity in the right and wise way.
 
This wisdom looks like my above one that says:
 
A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with minimum brute force to score and to succeed.
 
So you have to be smart , this is what i am learning with my writings.
 
So here is my poem and read it again:
 
Here is more explanation bellow of my following poem, you have to be
smart to understand it correctly ! here it is and read
my explanation of it bellow:
 
 
We are past and present
 
Because time is like a balance
 
Because time is perfection
 
Because perfection is the scale
 
But how perfection can be only light ?
 
Perfection is also darkness
 
Because we are strong and weak
 
Even silence is strong and weak
 
Eventhough silence is divine
 
Because even love is effervescence
 
Bees know about time
 
That time is relativity
 
And relativity is diversity
 
But what is perfection?
 
Perfection is also diversity
 
Diversity is also immensity
 
Because time is relativity
 
The weak needs the strong
 
And the strong needs the weak
 
But the weak becomes better
 
Because our civilization is not a decoy
 
Since diversity is the seed
 
Since the scale creates consciousness
 
Because the scale creates abundance
 
Since diversity is also seasons
 
Who creates wisdom and reason
 
So hello to you my dear and beautiful
 
With your lovely pretty eyes
 
You carry me on the wind and the Rainbow
 
To drive us to a beautiful island
 
Like our love and tenderness
 
Rather for goods never I leave you!
 
My sweet and beautiful goddess
 
My sweet spring and my sweet princess
 
Our hearts finally beat in unison
 
Like a nice thrill and a nice song
 
I do not want to hurt you
 
Because you are like the pretty flower that can not die!
 
As if both of us were as one
 
Let's be the flower and the perfum!
 
And may infinity and depth bring us together
 
Since our destiny is infinite
 
Since our destiny has understood
 
That the pretty fir is not cursed
 
Because Christmas is divine
 
As silence is a pretty parfum
 
Because in the depth of your pretty eyes
 
Who reminds me of our beautiful raft
 
Who defies storms and seasons
 
Since life is not a gift
 
And because destiny and reason are our passion
 
Because beauty reminds us
 
That she can not be violence and hatred
 
Since relativity of time is like a mason
 
Since the weather is seasons that brings reason
 
So, hello to you man of reason!
 
 
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
 
===
 
 
First to understand better, you have to understand that rationalism
alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so
you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and
to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because
my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have
to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain:
 
When i say in my poem the following:
 
"We are past and present
Because time is like a balance"
 
When i say we are past and present it must be measured by
my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem
is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is
both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and
not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering
and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from
the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the
meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present"
 
And now about the following part of my poem:
 
"Because time is like a balance"
 
I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need
the causes, this is why time is like a balance.
 
 
And about the other parts of my poem, we read this:
 
"Because time is perfection
Because perfection is the scale"
 
 
Here again you have to be smart to understand the meaning,
it is like rationalism and empiricism , you can not understand
the meaning by just being rationalism ! you have to be both rationalism
and empiricism to understand, so when you are both you will understand
by empiricism, that time is perfection, because the "small" cause of the
Big Bang has given the "immensity" of the Universe that is perfection,
and life also has started from "small" to "much" bigger that is
perfection, and when i say that: "Because perfection is the scale", that
means that for example the Universe and life have been perfected and it
is the scale, because the Universe has balanced more and life has
balanced more to be perfection.
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"But how perfection can be only light ?
Perfection is also darkness"
 
 
I mean that perfection needs the weak also, because we notice it
in our lives that the strong needs the weak, and life needs suffering,
this is why it is also "darkness".
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"Because we are strong and weak
Even silence is strong and weak
Eventhough silence is divine"
 
 
I mean by silence that it is complete silence of our thoughts , so
complete silence is not having consciousness, it is like a piece of
paper, a piece of paper is also complete silence, because it is not
consciousness, so a piece of paper is like divine, because it is very
"strong" because it doesn't feel suffering and it doesn't have
difficulties , but it is also weak if we take the measure and the
reference as being it much much less complex than other very complex
objects.
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"And relativity is diversity"
 
You need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
experience we can say that: "And relativity is diversity".
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"Perfection is also diversity
Diversity is also immensity
Because time is relativity"
 
Here again, you need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
experience we can say the above.
 
And i think that now it is more easy to understand all my poem above.
 
 
 
thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 09:27PM -0400

Hello....
 
Read this:
 
 
I explain more my poem bellow...
 
My poem bellow s full of wisdom, my poem bellow is like philosophy, i
will explain it to you more, because it's really smart !
 
As you have noticed i said in poem (Iook at it bellow), that:
 
"Because time is like a balance
Because time is perfection"
 
 
I explain:
 
Because capitalism is like a "balance" and life is like a balance ,
because we are like balancing to attain a stability or reliability,
we are balancing with causes and consequences and we are balancing with
perfections and imperfections so that to be "perfection" and we are
balancing with weaknesses and strongnesses so that to be "perfection"
, because morality is perfection at best or excellence
at best or quality at best ! this is why in my poem bellow i said that
"time is perfection" because time that is a "balance" has given us the
perfection of "consciousness", and consciousness is like reliability so
it is morality, and this "balance" knows about the reference of measure
that is stability and reliability, this is why this balance is a "scale"
that permits us to measure and since this balance is also perfection so
this perfection has created "consciousness" , this is why i say in my
bellow poem the following:
 
"Since the scale creates consciousness
Because the scale creates abundance"
 
Because the scale is this balance that is also perfection !
 
So you have to be smart to understand my poem !
 
Also i said the following about my poem bellow:
 
About the wisdom of my poems..
 
You will notice that my poems are like "wisdom", or like philosophy,
also because i am in reality a "gentleman" type of person, and i am
in reality like a "wise" type of person, and my poems are "smart" !
so i continu to explain to you my poems, as you have notice i have
posted one of my poem in my last post and i have explained it to you
more, you can read it bellow, you will notice also that
this poem is smart, because like my wisdom bellow
it get "out" you from "idealism" without getting into
pessimism and violence, because i have talked about idealism of racism
of neo-nazism or idealism of socialism and i have explained that
they are "not" correct morality, and i have explained to you what
is morality also, so thus notice in my poem bellow
that i am saying that "perfection" that has an essence "solving"
problems, because i think we say we are perfection and reliable if we
can solve problems, and if we are xcapable of solving all the problems
we wsay that we are absolute perfection or complete realiability, so
morality also is contineous perfection as i have explained, so notice
with me that in my poem bellow i said that perfection is also
"diversity" or perfection is also "darkness" of weakness or suffering,
and i said that perfection is also the strong that needs the weak and
weak that needs the strong, and i said also also in my poem that:
 
"But the weak becomes better
Because our civilization is not a decoy"
 
 
So as you have noticed my poem is smart because in my poem i am getting
out of idealism without being pessimism and violence, this is why i have
said the following on one of my previous post:
 
 
My wisdom of today..
 
A better politics..
 
Now you know me more by my writings, and now i will give you an
important wisdom:
 
One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:
 
Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being
pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence.
 
My other wisdom of today is:
 
A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with a minimum brute force to score and to succeed.
 
 
This is why i told you before another wisdom by saying the following:
 
Violence is "easy" today, so destruction is easy, but "wisdom"
is to know how to transcend our living conditions by being
discipline of technology and science and by being sophistication
of technology and science and by being wisdom that knows
how to guide our world and humanity in the right and wise way.
 
This wisdom looks like my above one that says:
 
A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with minimum brute force to score and to succeed.
 
So you have to be smart , this is what i am learning with my writings.
 
So here is my poem and read it again:
 
Here is more explanation bellow of my following poem, you have to be
smart to understand it correctly ! here it is and read
my explanation of it bellow:
 
 
We are past and present
 
Because time is like a balance
 
Because time is perfection
 
Because perfection is the scale
 
But how perfection can be only light ?
 
Perfection is also darkness
 
Because we are strong and weak
 
Even silence is strong and weak
 
Eventhough silence is divine
 
Because even love is effervescence
 
Bees know about time
 
That time is relativity
 
And relativity is diversity
 
But what is perfection?
 
Perfection is also diversity
 
Diversity is also immensity
 
Because time is relativity
 
The weak needs the strong
 
And the strong needs the weak
 
But the weak becomes better
 
Because our civilization is not a decoy
 
Since diversity is the seed
 
Since the scale creates consciousness
 
Because the scale creates abundance
 
Since diversity is also seasons
 
Who creates wisdom and reason
 
So hello to you my dear and beautiful
 
With your lovely pretty eyes
 
You carry me on the wind and the Rainbow
 
To drive us to a beautiful island
 
Like our love and tenderness
 
Rather for goods never I leave you!
 
My sweet and beautiful goddess
 
My sweet spring and my sweet princess
 
Our hearts finally beat in unison
 
Like a nice thrill and a nice song
 
I do not want to hurt you
 
Because you are like the pretty flower that can not die!
 
As if both of us were as one
 
Let's be the flower and the perfum!
 
And may infinity and depth bring us together
 
Since our destiny is infinite
 
Since our destiny has understood
 
That the pretty fir is not cursed
 
Because Christmas is divine
 
As silence is a pretty parfum
 
Because in the depth of your pretty eyes
 
Who reminds me of our beautiful raft
 
Who defies storms and seasons
 
Since life is not a gift
 
And because destiny and reason are our passion
 
Because beauty reminds us
 
That she can not be violence and hatred
 
Since relativity of time is like a mason
 
Since the weather is seasons that brings reason
 
So, hello to you man of reason!
 
 
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
 
===
 
 
First to understand better, you have to understand that rationalism
alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so
you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and
to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because
my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have
to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain:
 
When i say in my poem the following:
 
"We are past and present
Because time is like a balance"
 
When i say we are past and present it must be measured by
my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem
is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is
both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and
not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering
and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from
the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the
meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present"
 
And now about the following part of my poem:
 
"Because time is like a balance"
 
I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need
the causes, this is why time is like a balance.
 
 
And about the other parts of my poem, we read this:
 
"Because time is perfection
Because perfection is the scale"
 
 
Here again you have to be smart to understand the meaning,
it is like rationalism and empiricism , you can not understand
the meaning by just being rationalism ! you have to be both rationalism
and empiricism to understand, so when you are both you will understand
by empiricism, that time is perfection, because the "small" cause of the
Big Bang has given the "immensity" of the Universe that is perfection,
and life also has started from "small" to "much" bigger that is
perfection, and when i say that: "Because perfection is the scale", that
means that for example the Universe and life have been perfected and it
is the scale, because the Universe has balanced more and life has
balanced more to be perfection.
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"But how perfection can be only light ?
Perfection is also darkness"
 
 
I mean that perfection needs the weak also, because we notice it
in our lives that the strong needs the weak, and life needs suffering,
this is why it is also "darkness".
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"Because we are strong and weak
Even silence is strong and weak
Eventhough silence is divine"
 
 
I mean by silence that it is complete silence of our thoughts , so
complete silence is not having consciousness, it is like a piece of
paper, a piece of paper is also complete silence, because it is not
consciousness, so a piece of paper is like divine, because it is very
"strong" because it doesn't feel suffering and it doesn't have
difficulties , but it is also weak if we take the measure and the
reference as being it much much less complex than other very complex
objects.
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"And relativity is diversity"
 
You need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
experience we can say that: "And relativity is diversity".
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"Perfection is also diversity
Diversity is also immensity
Because time is relativity"
 
Here again, you need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
experience we can say the above.
 
And i think that now it is more easy to understand all my poem above.
 
 
 
thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 08:22PM -0400

Hello....
 
Read this:
 
 
I am for a smart capitalism..
 
But what is a smart capitalism ?
 
It is first a capitalism that can convince you smartly !
 
As you have noticed i am explaining to you what is
capitalism of USA and you are feeling more capitalism
, i am doing it also to be able for you to be more tolerance
with capitalism, also i am "trying" to learn capitalism to be smarter !
and i think that the essence of capitalism must be defined
better to be able to feel it more ! here is how i will define it:
 
Capitalism belong to the "set" of humanity and
capitalism "is" or is "composed" of capitalism of "today" and capitalism
of the "future" , so capitalism must know how to "balance"
with responsability taking into account the present and the future of
our world and being responsable for present and future generations !
but i am saying it and showing you an important constrain that shows you
the way to tolerance towards capitalism, and here it is, read
about the following constraint:
 
Morality is also "diversity"
 
I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction,
i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that
are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the
system, i think that's lack of maturity that doesn't recognize that
there is also "constrains" that we have to deal with, and saying like
neo-nazism that all that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be
a parasite is also an "idealism"
that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be more "maturity"
that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be able to be an
appropriate morality, today because of our world is
not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate
that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google)
and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals,
and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing
the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that
takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take
more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think
that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism,
because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to
be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections
of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears
the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of other ideologies
like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why capitalistic systems are
"conservatism" of there capitalism.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
 
What is the essence of tolerance and compassion ?
 
There essence are the same as the essence of a group, we are grouping
because of our weaknesses to become more strong and more perfection to
be able to survive better ! the essence of tolerance and compassion is
the same , we need compassion and tolerance because its inherent to
morality ! because morality is maximizing at best excellence or quality
! but this maximization knows about our weaknesses , so since there is
still weaknesses there
is still compassion and tolerance ! thus logically weaknesses do
engender tolerance and compassion on the other and on the other races
because of weaknesses of our own and because compassion and tolerance
are also defined by the consequences that are the same as compassion and
tolerance, because by a good approximation and we are in fuzzy logic,
the consequences of wise egoism as i have explained lesser egoism of
nationalism ! for example wise egoism that is the consumer confidence
index or economic growth that
attract the investment from abroad can be approximated as compassion and
tolerance, and notice that if we were Gods we will need less
to group and we will need less compassion and tolerance ! this is
the essence of morality.
 
So read more about the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
Yet more about the essence of morality and the essence of our civilization:
 
I have to be more smart..
 
I have given many definitions of morality and i have explained them to you..
 
Here is another definition that says that morality is: maximizing
"quality" or the degree of "excellence" at best.
 
Now we know what is quality, quality is the degree of excellence
of something..
 
But what is reliability ?
 
We say in computer science that if we increase the mean time between
failures, we increase reliability, but is reliability only increasing
the mean time between failures ? i don't think so, because we can say,
if we put the reference as being "perfect", that less performance
is like a "bug" or a "bad" that "hurts" the system compared to being
perfect. So being more performance is being more reliability too, also
being less beautifulness can be considered as a state that can
make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system that hurts
to a certain level, so we can say that being more beautiful is being
more reliability, and being less perfection can be considered as a state
that can make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system,
so perfection is reliability, and perfection is quality,
so reliability is quality, but what is morality? i think morality
is maximizing the degree of excellence at best , so then morality
is quality that too maximizes the degree of quality at best,
so from the above we can say that morality is perfection and perfection
is reliability and then morality is reliability. This is in accordance
with my proof bellow, so since morality is quality and morality is
perfection, then how can we avoid extremism of perfection or quality
that hurts the system ? i think morality is constrained by people
of the system or by Democracy that is the tool to avoid extremism
of perfection and quality that hurts.
 
More profond about philosophy now..
 
I said before that:
 
cleanliness generate morality
 
But what about Donald Trump that said that:
 
Haiti and many african countries are shithole countries.
 
Is Donald Trump "cleanliness" to say so ?
 
You have to understand better "cleanliness", cleanliness
is knowing how to "balance" the "requirements", so
you have to take into account "security" and be less
provocative than Donald Trump, this is why Donald Trump is
not the right requirement of "security" to say the above
about many african countries and about haiti, because
Donald Trump is more "virility" that is more "violent"
and that does not balance with the other requirements
of "sensibility" and "morality" to be better security.
 
Now i give you another example:
 
Neo-nazism is saying that arabs are not
as beautiful as white europeans, so they want to discriminate
them and to be more violent with them, but this neo-nazism is an
immature morality, because we have to know how to transcend it towards
a better world that takes into account "usefulness" and
"security" and "economy", so this is why the requirements
of today is to have a more interconnected economies
around the world, even with arabs and with africans,
this is because we have to take into account
the economic growth of arab and african countries that
is for example more attractive for economic investment,
also we have to take into account the consumer
confidence index globally and locally,
so we have to know how to be "respect" towards arabs
and africans, and we have also to take into
account the "usefulness" of arabs and africans, because
many western countries bring arab and african immigrants
because they are useful for jobs and because they are also
useful for low birth rate of white europeans , and also you have to
know, like have said Fordism, how to give the necessary wages to
others(even globally) to be able for them to buy
your products and services, so i have also proved and said that:
cleanliness generate morality, but as i have just explained that
"cleanliness" must know how to take into account the right requirements
as i said above, and it must know how to balance the "requirements".
 
 
More precision about philosophy..
 
We have to get into more "calculations" and more "precision" to
understand better, this is what we call also philosophy, so i said
before that:
 
==
And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.
 
And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality.
==
 
 
Here is my logical proof about: cleanliness generate morality
 
Since morality is all about what is bad and what is good,
so a weaker definition of morality is the act of distinguishing
between the good and bad, but this is a "weaker" definition,
because to be able to distinguish between the good and the bad
we have to be more rationality and/or more science, but
as i said before that "cleanliness" generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, so by less espressiveness we can
say that cleanliness contains the "requirement" of being a more
scientific mind, this is like "inherent" to cleanliness, because
"cleanliness" needs to be more and more "perfect" so that to avoid
the "bad" of imperfection or weakness, so this is why
the right requirements are inherent to "cleanliness", so it makes my
following affirmation correct and true: cleanliness generate morality
 
 
I will get into more philosophy..
 
As you have noticed i have said that morality is defined as: reliability
or by more expressiveness by: performance and reliability.
 
Now to "model" better humans, we have the following:
 
sensibility, morality, rationality, virility, intelligence, and language
 
And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.
 
And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality,
 
Now from "sensibility" we get love and we get security too.
 
And from "rationality" we get a mind that is more rational and more logic.
 
from "virility" we get more performance , but if virility is not
"constrained" by the others such as morality and sensibility and
rationality, we can get violence and insecurity.
 
I think this is how we can "model" better humans both "genetically" and
"culturally".
 
Here is my other new thoughts..
 
What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy
and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure"
and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to
reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed
i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its
"essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important
question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is
the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more
"precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ?
i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing
can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is
morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and
"reliability"(as i have proved bellow), or simply "reliability"(as i
have proved bellow) that can model morality correctly as i have proved
it in my previous post, so the essence of our civilization is the act of
coordinating and organizing those advantages
and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to
be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence
"performance" and "reliability", and as a validation of my model, you
will notice that we are decentralizing "governance", and each of the
decentralized parts of the governance are grouping the "advantages" and
trying to minimize the disadvantages of each of us that do the
governance , democracy is also the same , because democracy is a system
that wants to escape a "local" maximum towards a global maximum
like in artificial intelligence, and democracy is doing it by
applying itself to selecting the best among the actors of
politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of civilization,
is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by optimization,
as i have just explained to you, so hope you are understanding
my new thoughts of today.
 
 
And here is my other thoughts about morality(with my other definitions
about morality):
 
Morality is also "diversity"
 
I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction,
i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that
are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the
system, i think that's lack of maturity that doesn't recognize that
there is also "constrains" that we have to deal with, and saying like
neo-nazism that all that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be
a parasite is also an "idealism"
that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be more "maturity"
that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be able to be an
appropriate morality, today because of our world is
not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate
that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google)
and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals,
and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing
the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that
takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take
more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think
that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism,
because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to
be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections
of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears
the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of other ideologies
like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why capitalistic systems are
"conservatism" of there capitalism.
 
Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
More smartness about morality..
 
Like Philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant you can define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience.
 
You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.
 
Now what about my definitions of morality ?
 
We have to be more smart..
 
I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good
for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will
notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection",
but we have to speak about a constraint over morality,
that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are
too bad ! so this will abstract more correctly the definition
of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality
as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells
us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive"
we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and
when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that
means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it,
so my definition is also correct, and this apllies also to my other
definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical
proof is valid, so reread my following thoughts to understand better:
 
 
I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has
invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 06:12PM -0400

Hello....
 
Read this:
 
Yet more about the essence of morality and the essence of our civilization:
 
I have to be more smart..
 
I have given many definitions of morality and i have explained them to you..
 
Here is another definition that says that morality is: maximizing
"quality" or the degree of "excellence" at best.
 
Now we know what is quality, quality is the degree of excellence
of something..
 
But what is reliability ?
 
We say in computer science that if we increase the mean time between
failures, we increase reliability, but is reliability only increasing
the mean time between failures ? i don't think so, because we can say,
if we put the reference as being "perfect", that less performance
is like a "bug" or a "bad" that "hurts" the system compared to being
perfect. So being more performance is being more reliability too, also
being less beautifulness can be considered as a state that can
make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system that hurts
to a certain level, so we can say that being more beautiful is being
more reliability, and being less perfection can be considered as a state
that can make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system,
so perfection is reliability, and perfection is quality,
so reliability is quality, but what is morality? i think morality
is maximizing the degree of excellence at best , so then morality
is quality that too maximizes the degree of quality at best,
so from the above we can say that morality is perfection and perfection
is reliability and then morality is reliability. This is in accordance
with my proof bellow, so since morality is quality and morality is
perfection, then how can we avoid extremism of perfection or quality
that hurts the system ? i think morality is constrained by people
of the system or by Democracy that is the tool to avoid extremism
of perfection and quality that hurts.
 
More profond about philosophy now..
 
I said before that:
 
cleanliness generate morality
 
But what about Donald Trump that said that:
 
Haiti and many african countries are shithole countries.
 
Is Donald Trump "cleanliness" to say so ?
 
You have to understand better "cleanliness", cleanliness
is knowing how to "balance" the "requirements", so
you have to take into account "security" and be less
provocative than Donald Trump, this is why Donald Trump is
not the right requirement of "security" to say the above
about many african countries and about haiti, because
Donald Trump is more "virility" that is more "violent"
and that does not balance with the other requirements
of "sensibility" and "morality" to be better security.
 
Now i give you another example:
 
Neo-nazism is saying that arabs are not
as beautiful as white europeans, so they want to discriminate
them and to be more violent with them, but this neo-nazism is an
immature morality, because we have to know how to transcend it towards
a better world that takes into account "usefulness" and
"security" and "economy", so this is why the requirements
of today is to have a more interconnected economies
around the world, even with arabs and with africans,
this is because we have to take into account
the economic growth of arab and african countries that
is for example more attractive for economic investment,
also we have to take into account the consumer
confidence index globally and locally,
so we have to know how to be "respect" towards arabs
and africans, and we have also to take into
account the "usefulness" of arabs and africans, because
many western countries bring arab and african immigrants
because they are useful for jobs and because they are also
useful for low birth rate of white europeans , and also you have to
know, like have said Fordism, how to give the necessary wages to
others(even globally) to be able for them to buy
your products and services, so i have also proved and said that:
cleanliness generate morality, but as i have just explained that
"cleanliness" must know how to take into account the right requirements
as i said above, and it must know how to balance the "requirements".
 
 
More precision about philosophy..
 
We have to get into more "calculations" and more "precision" to
understand better, this is what we call also philosophy, so i said
before that:
 
==
And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.
 
And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality.
==
 
 
Here is my logical proof about: cleanliness generate morality
 
Since morality is all about what is bad and what is good,
so a weaker definition of morality is the act of distinguishing
between the good and bad, but this is a "weaker" definition,
because to be able to distinguish between the good and the bad
we have to be more rationality and/or more science, but
as i said before that "cleanliness" generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, so by less espressiveness we can
say that cleanliness contains the "requirement" of being a more
scientific mind, this is like "inherent" to cleanliness, because
"cleanliness" needs to be more and more "perfect" so that to avoid
the "bad" of imperfection or weakness, so this is why
the right requirements are inherent to "cleanliness", so it makes my
following affirmation correct and true: cleanliness generate morality
 
 
I will get into more philosophy..
 
As you have noticed i have said that morality is defined as: reliability
or by more expressiveness by: performance and reliability.
 
Now to "model" better humans, we have the following:
 
sensibility, morality, rationality, virility, intelligence, and language
 
And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.
 
And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality,
 
Now from "sensibility" we get love and we get security too.
 
And from "rationality" we get a mind that is more rational and more logic.
 
from "virility" we get more performance , but if virility is not
"constrained" by the others such as morality and sensibility and
rationality, we can get violence and insecurity.
 
I think this is how we can "model" better humans both "genetically" and
"culturally".
 
Here is my other new thoughts..
 
What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy
and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure"
and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to
reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed
i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its
"essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important
question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is
the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more
"precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ?
i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing
can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is
morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and
"reliability"(as i have proved bellow), or simply "reliability"(as i
have proved bellow) that can model morality correctly as i have proved
it in my previous post, so the essence of our civilization is the act of
coordinating and organizing those advantages
and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to
be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence
"performance" and "reliability", and as a validation of my model, you
will notice that we are decentralizing "governance", and each of the
decentralized parts of the governance are grouping the "advantages" and
trying to minimize the disadvantages of each of us that do the
governance , democracy is also the same , because democracy is a system
that wants to escape a "local" maximum towards a global maximum
like in artificial intelligence, and democracy is doing it by
applying itself to selecting the best among the actors of
politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of civilization,
is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by optimization,
as i have just explained to you, so hope you are understanding
my new thoughts of today.
 
 
And here is my other thoughts about morality(with my other definitions
about morality):
 
Morality is also "diversity"
 
I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction,
i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that
are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the
system, i think that's lack of maturity that doesn't recognize that
there is also "constrains" that we have to deal with, and saying like
neo-nazism that all that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be
a parasite is also an "idealism"
that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be more "maturity"
that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be able to be an
appropriate morality, today because of our world is
not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate
that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google)
and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals,
and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing
the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that
takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take
more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think
that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism,
because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to
be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections
of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears
the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of other ideologies
like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why capitalistic systems are
"conservatism" of there capitalism.
 
Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
More smartness about morality..
 
Like Philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant you can define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience.
 
You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.
 
Now what about my definitions of morality ?
 
We have to be more smart..
 
I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good
for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will
notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection",
but we have to speak about a constraint over morality,
that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are
too bad ! so this will abstract more correctly the definition
of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality
as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells
us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive"
we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and
when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that
means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it,
so my definition is also correct, and this apllies also to my other
definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical
proof is valid, so reread my following thoughts to understand better:
 
 
I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has
invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.
 
Now about the right abstraction of morality
 
What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?
 
This is a good question in philosophy !
 
It is like mathematics , you have to be more "logical" and be more
"measure" and be more "precise", and being more logical and more measure
and more precise is like doing mathematics !
 
Why have you seen me defining and explaining to you what is morality ?
 
It is a very serious subject, and you have to be smart to understand it !
 
Because philosophy, like the philosophy of the philosopher that is Sir
Immanuel Kant, must be a philosophy that is more "precise" calculations
with logic and measure that has as a goal to make us understand what is
all about morality ! this is what also i am doing ! and i will continu
to do it in front of your eyes..
 
So my question of today is:
 
What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?
 
A more correct abstraction of morality is first a definition
of morality that is sufficient and necessary to be able to see
more the big picture of what is morality, and if you are
like the philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant, you will define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience, but i think that
this definition is too much abstraction that doesn't show us the big
picture of what is morality, so we have to be more smart , this
is why you have seen me thinking more smartly to find what is morality,
and you have noticed that my first definition of morality was that
morality is: Performance and reliability or is by just one word
reliability, and i have also defined morality by saying that it is:
perfection and strongness , and i have finally explained and give
another definition of morality that is: morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, this
abstraction is more correct also , i explain:
 
So when i said that morality is: performance and reliability, is it
a correct definition ?
 
It is like philosophy that i am doing..
 
So notice that i have proved it this way:
 
==
 
From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?
 
Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are
organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so
from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our
essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and
strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact
that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so
this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is
inherent to morality.
 
So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on
"performance".
 
===
 
 
So as you have noticed that this proves the part of my definition
of morality that it is also "performance", now the second part
of the definition of morality is that morality is also "reliability",
and i have "proved" it like this:
 
==
 
What is the essence of reliability ?
 
What is reliability ?
 
We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the
measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right
"perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right
perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 04:45PM -0400

Hello...
 
Read this:
 
 
More precision about my philosophy..
 
In philosophy we have to define correctly what is a "reification"..
 
And if you have noticed i am also "logical" by considering the fact
that it a thing "exists" in the "real" world as being a "reification",
this is why you have to read all my thoughts bellow to understand more:
 
I am a white arab..
 
Yet more philosophy and political philosophy..
 
What is the essence of an idea ?
 
I need a more correct abstraction..
 
So how can we start to solve by thinking ?
 
Let us look for example at its characteristic..
 
If we look at its platonism, its reification of the future or past or
present experience is a platonism that can be considered a
characteristic of an idea that can be considered a special
characteristic that makes the idea not considered getting old ! this is
why the idea is really special, and does an idea is material or
immaterial ? i think the immaterial part of an idea exists, because
it reifies a future or past or present experience ! so like
empiricism or rationalism, you have to be both rationalism
and empiricism to be able to be correct morality or correct
thinking ! i think the idea is composed of an immaterial and a
material ! and the proof is that ideas can reify
the experience of the future and that doesn't yet exist(please read
bellow my thoughts as a proof) ! or ideas can be immaterial of a concept
that doesn't yet exist ! so i am not in accordance with the philosopher
Plato that have said that an idea is just an idea that is immaterial,
and also i say that an idea is like more light weight because i think
ideas can be perfected faster(so better) and better than physical world
because ideas has less "constrains" than the physical world. Read the
rest of my thoughts to understand better my philosophy:
 
Can we travel back in time?
 
Here is my thoughts:
 
It is a very interesting question that demands rationality
and logical thinking to answer it ...
 
To answer it, i start from a mathematical subject which is the
mathematical arithmetic series.
 
An arithmetic series has as its main characteristic that
the difference between its terms is constant ... and that its sum
gives (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), a_n being the last term ... now you have
to be smart and notice with me that just before the final step of the
final calculation that resulted as a general equation of the arithmetic
series, the calculation of the arithmetic series required of us a much
bigger time to solve the series .. But as soon as the result (a_n * (a_n
+ 1)) / 2 has been reached, the time for the resolution of the
arithmetic series has greatly diminished, therefore the time preceding
the resolution has compressed a lot and allowed us to travel in the the
future quickly, the resolution of the arithmetic series which gave: (a_n
* (a_n + 1)) / 2), it's like a wormhole in the universe permit us to
time travel in the future more quickly, but understand with me that the
time travel in the future that allows you to make the equation of (a_n *
(a_n + 1)) / 2) is relative to the time taken previously by the
arithmetic series just before the discovery of the equation (a_n * (a_n
+ 1)) / 2), and thus that the universe is computable and that ultimately
it allowed a time travel and thanks to mathematics that is something
extra-ordinary in itself.
 
Now I will be more logical and ask myself the following question:
 
Is there any contradiction in my evidence since a car
is not a machine to allow time travel in the future to
the simple reason that the regions where we will travel and arrive
faster with a car will not have aged in time that corresponds to the
future time in which one arrives by the feet?
 
I answer this in a more logical way:
 
Notice that when I said that the mathematical equation
of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is a time travel machine
that permits to travel in the future, because it is an equation that
also predicts the result more quickly to which one arrives by paper
without this equation, so the time has no hold on the theoretical result
that is predicted faster so that there is no contradiction when it comes
to theoretical prediction. Also when you use this invention That is this
mathematical equation of the arithmetic series: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2),
it is that you are living the future of the one who has not yet
invented or used this equation and who will arrive there in its future,
therefore it is for this reason that this equation is also a time travel
machine that permits to travel in the future and it has a predictive
characteristic.
 
So there is no contradiction and therefore we can
consider a car as a time traveling machine to travel in the future, like
the microprocessor, and like several other mathematical inventions
as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series.
 
Here is one of my conclusion:
 
If you are traveling from Montreal to Paris
by airplane, and that another person swims and walk
by foot to Paris, and assume that the person who moves by swiming
and walking wants to see Paris and answer some questions,
And if you travel to Paris by plane and you
answer these questions more quickly since you are going to see Paris
more quickly than the person swimming and and walking , so that
has a predictive character as the mathematical equation of the
arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), since you will be able
to send an email quickly to the person who wants to
to swim and walk to Paris and give him
the answers he's looking for, so you'll be able to see
the answers of his future, and this predictive characteristic
can be considered as a time travel machine that permits to travel in the
future,
so the aircraft and the car are like time travel machines that permit to
travel in the future ... as well as the processors and other
mathematical inventions and others...
 
 
Rationality and logic also have a predictive characteristic,
so you must also reason better in a more scientific manner and take into
account the scientific and empirical evidence to
be ahead of others, like a time machine that permits to travel in the
future..
 
If a first person receives a valuable advice and this advice
of value allows him to better control his future and to succeed in his
life in the future by executing this valuable advice and also it allows
him to predict his future, and besides, imagine that a second person
will receive in its future this valuable advice, then the first person
will be able to guess with CERTITUDE the future of the second person
which will be the consequence of the execution of this valuable advice ,
and not only the first person will have lived the future of the second
person before the second person, since the two will have lived the same
event by the execution of this valuable advice, then in my opinion we
must reason as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic and
notice that since the first person will guess with CERTITUDE
The future of the second person and will also live the future event of
the second person, then those two theoretical and
empirical evidences confirms that the first person has lived the future
event of the second person, so this valuable advice could be called by
mathematical approximation a time machine that permits to travel in the
future, I say "approximation", because we by analogy are as in fuzzy
logic rather than in boolean logic, in addition to that, that the fact
that the first person guesses with CERTITUDE the future of the second
person, this informs in a logical manner that this certainty change our
way of perceiving, for this certainty, even if
it is not travel in the future, it is by approximation
as a journey into the future, for a journey into the future
will lead to the same certainty, and as a result
the same certainties permit us to affirm by approximation
that the valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel
in the future.
 
Then you understand that I am also a Platonist,
Because you noticed that I can define this time travel in the future as
a platonic event, so when i said that a valuable advice is a time
machine that permits to travel in the future, you understand that it
makes us live platonically the future of others, and since I am a also
Platonist, I affirm that a valuable advice is a time travel machine
that permits us to travel in the future of others since time has no hold
on the ideas, and that the same idea through time inside two
persons, is the same idea, therefore my proof is made that the valuable
advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future.
 
When you imagine a circle, I asserts that not only can you imagine the
circle in material or matter but also in immaterial, as was my proof
that I have just given you , this immaterial essence of the idea is
reified by our reason, and that is the reason that gives it existence.
So this in my opinion is sufficient proof that the idea exists because
we feel it by our reason and it pays homage to our beloved philosopher
Plato.
 
It is this reification of the immaterial essence of the idea
by reason which gives the necessary and even sufficient approximation to
call even a valuable advice a time machine that permits to travel in the
future.
 
Then since the idea exists and since a sensation also exists,
then one can not also distinguish an idea from the generated sensation
by the execution as an automaton of a valuable advice at a time t1 and a
time t1 + t2, and since an idea does not age then we can affirm that
valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the
future, and the valuable advice has a predictive characteristic, because
the approximation is sufficient since we are not in boolean logic but in
fuzzy logic.
 
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 04:21PM -0400

Hello....
 
Read this:
 
 
I am a white arab..
 
Yet more philosophy and political philosophy..
 
What is the essence of an idea ?
 
I need a more correct abstraction..
 
So how can we start to solve by thinking ?
 
Let us look for example at its characteristic..
 
If we look at its platonism, its reification of the future or past or
present experience is a platonism that can be considered a
characteristic of an idea that can be considered a special
characteristic that makes the idea not considered getting old ! this is
why the idea is really special, and does an idea is material or
immaterial ? i think the immaterial part of an idea exists, because
it reifies a future or past or present experience ! so like
empiricism or rationalism, you have to be both rationalism
and empiricism to be able to be correct morality or correct
thinking ! i think the idea is composed of an immaterial and a
material ! and the proof is that ideas can reify
the experience of the future and that doesn't yet exist(please read
bellow my thoughts as a proof) ! or an ideas can be immaterial of a
concept that doesn't yet exist ! so i am not in accordance with the
philosopher Plato that have said that an idea is just an idea that is
immaterial, and also i say that an idea is like more light weight
because i think ideas can be perfected faster(so better) and better than
physical world because ideas has less "constrains" than the physical
world. Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better my philosophy:
 
Can we travel back in time?
 
Here is my thoughts:
 
It is a very interesting question that demands rationality
and logical thinking to answer it ...
 
To answer it, i start from a mathematical subject which is the
mathematical arithmetic series.
 
An arithmetic series has as its main characteristic that
the difference between its terms is constant ... and that its sum
gives (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), a_n being the last term ... now you have
to be smart and notice with me that just before the final step of the
final calculation that resulted as a general equation of the arithmetic
series, the calculation of the arithmetic series required of us a much
bigger time to solve the series .. But as soon as the result (a_n * (a_n
+ 1)) / 2 has been reached, the time for the resolution of the
arithmetic series has greatly diminished, therefore the time preceding
the resolution has compressed a lot and allowed us to travel in the the
future quickly, the resolution of the arithmetic series which gave: (a_n
* (a_n + 1)) / 2), it's like a wormhole in the universe permit us to
time travel in the future more quickly, but understand with me that the
time travel in the future that allows you to make the equation of (a_n *
(a_n + 1)) / 2) is relative to the time taken previously by the
arithmetic series just before the discovery of the equation (a_n * (a_n
+ 1)) / 2), and thus that the universe is computable and that ultimately
it allowed a time travel and thanks to mathematics that is something
extra-ordinary in itself.
 
Now I will be more logical and ask myself the following question:
 
Is there any contradiction in my evidence since a car
is not a machine to allow time travel in the future to
the simple reason that the regions where we will travel and arrive
faster with a car will not have aged in time that corresponds to the
future time in which one arrives by the feet?
 
I answer this in a more logical way:
 
Notice that when I said that the mathematical equation
of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is a time travel machine
that permits to travel in the future, because it is an equation that
also predicts the result more quickly to which one arrives by paper
without this equation, so the time has no hold on the theoretical result
that is predicted faster so that there is no contradiction when it comes
to theoretical prediction. Also when you use this invention That is this
mathematical equation of the arithmetic series: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2),
it is that you are living the future of the one who has not yet
invented or used this equation and who will arrive there in its future,
therefore it is for this reason that this equation is also a time travel
machine that permits to travel in the future and it has a predictive
characteristic.
 
So there is no contradiction and therefore we can
consider a car as a time traveling machine to travel in the future, like
the microprocessor, and like several other mathematical inventions
as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series.
 
Here is one of my conclusion:
 
If you are traveling from Montreal to Paris
by airplane, and that another person swims and walk
by foot to Paris, and assume that the person who moves by swiming
and walking wants to see Paris and answer some questions,
And if you travel to Paris by plane and you
answer these questions more quickly since you are going to see Paris
more quickly than the person swimming and and walking , so that
has a predictive character as the mathematical equation of the
arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), since you will be able
to send an email quickly to the person who wants to
to swim and walk to Paris and give him
the answers he's looking for, so you'll be able to see
the answers of his future, and this predictive characteristic
can be considered as a time travel machine that permits to travel in the
future,
so the aircraft and the car are like time travel machines that permit to
travel in the future ... as well as the processors and other
mathematical inventions and others...
 
 
Rationality and logic also have a predictive characteristic,
so you must also reason better in a more scientific manner and take into
account the scientific and empirical evidence to
be ahead of others, like a time machine that permits to travel in the
future..
 
If a first person receives a valuable advice and this advice
of value allows him to better control his future and to succeed in his
life in the future by executing this valuable advice and also it allows
him to predict his future, and besides, imagine that a second person
will receive in its future this valuable advice, then the first person
will be able to guess with CERTITUDE the future of the second person
which will be the consequence of the execution of this valuable advice ,
and not only the first person will have lived the future of the second
person before the second person, since the two will have lived the same
event by the execution of this valuable advice, then in my opinion we
must reason as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic and
notice that since the first person will guess with CERTITUDE
The future of the second person and will also live the future event of
the second person, then those two theoretical and
empirical evidences confirms that the first person has lived the future
event of the second person, so this valuable advice could be called by
mathematical approximation a time machine that permits to travel in the
future, I say "approximation", because we by analogy are as in fuzzy
logic rather than in boolean logic, in addition to that, that the fact
that the first person guesses with CERTITUDE the future of the second
person, this informs in a logical manner that this certainty change our
way of perceiving, for this certainty, even if
it is not travel in the future, it is by approximation
as a journey into the future, for a journey into the future
will lead to the same certainty, and as a result
the same certainties permit us to affirm by approximation
that the valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel
in the future.
 
Then you understand that I am also a Platonist,
Because you noticed that I can define this time travel in the future as
a platonic event, so when i said that a valuable advice is a time
machine that permits to travel in the future, you understand that it
makes us live platonically the future of others, and since I am a also
Platonist, I affirm that a valuable advice is a time travel machine
that permits us to travel in the future of others since time has no hold
on the ideas, and that the same idea through time inside two
persons, is the same idea, therefore my proof is made that the valuable
advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future.
 
When you imagine a circle, I asserts that not only can you imagine the
circle in material or matter but also in immaterial, as was my proof
that I have just given you , this immaterial essence of the idea is
reified by our reason, and that is the reason that gives it existence.
So this in my opinion is sufficient proof that the idea exists because
we feel it by our reason and it pays homage to our beloved philosopher
Plato.
 
It is this reification of the immaterial essence of the idea
by reason which gives the necessary and even sufficient approximation to
call even a valuable advice a time machine that permits to travel in the
future.
 
Then since the idea exists and since a sensation also exists,
then one can not also distinguish an idea from the generated sensation
by the execution as an automaton of a valuable advice at a time t1 and a
time t1 + t2, and since an idea does not age then we can affirm that
valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the
future, and the valuable advice has a predictive characteristic, because
the approximation is sufficient since we are not in boolean logic but in
fuzzy logic.
 
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 02:15PM -0400

Hello..
 
Read this:
 
 
About USL Scalability Modeling with Three Parameters
 
As you have noticed i have implemented Universal Scalability Law for
Delphi and FreePascal, and i have also included the executable programs
inside the zip file, you can download it from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal
 
But my above USL program is using two parameters , alpha and beta.
 
Now i am actually implementing the USL with three parameters, read
about it here:
 
http://perfdynamics.blogspot.com/2018/05/usl-scalability-modeling-with-three.html
 
 
So here is the USL function with three parameters that i am passing to
the following partial derivatives calculator:
 
https://www.emathhelp.net/calculators/calculus-3/partial-derivative-calculator/?f=%28x%29*k+%2F%281+%2B+%28n*+%28x+-1%29%29%2B+%28m+*+x+*+%28x+-1%29%29%29&var=k&steps=on
 
 
Here is the function: (x)*k /(1 + (n* (x -1))+ (m * x * (x -1)))
 
 
And here is the partial derivatives that you have to pass
the nonlinear regression solver:
 
And you have to solve with the order of integration that is k
 
And you have to solve with the order of integration that is n
 
And you have to solve with the order of integration that is m
 
 
After that you will get your partial derivatives functions that i will
pass to my nonlinear regression solver, so i am actually upgrading
my USL for Delphi and FreePascal to support USL with the three Parameters
 
So stay tuned ! i will soon bring you the updated version of my
USL that will use three parameters for Windows and Linux and that will
contain the executable programs for Window and for Linux.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 02:35PM -0400

Hello..
 
Read this:
 
I correct a typo:
 
Here is the USL function with three parameters that you have to solve
with the partial derivatives calculator:
 
https://www.emathhelp.net/calculators/calculus-3/partial-derivative-calculator/?f=%28x*k%29+%2F%281+%2B+%28n*+%28x+-1%29%29%2B+%28m+*+x+*+%28x+-1%29%29%29&var=k&steps=on
 
 
Thank you.
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 12:48PM -0400

Hello...
 
 
I have looked at all the videos of this "asian" software engineer,
and i like all his videos, because he is a disciplined software engineer
and he his a gentleman, i invite you to look at his following video:
 
Why Silicon Valley is the best place in the world (for software engineers)
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXZhXRPHItE&t=6s
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 12:05PM -0400

Hello...
 
Read this:
 
 
How to Combat China's Rise in Tech: Federal Spending, Not Tariffs
 
Meanwhile, the Chinese government is playing the role the United States
once did. Over the past decade, China has pushed an aggressive series of
plans meant to gain dominance in technological areas it considers
crucial to the global economy.
 
One program, Made in China 2025, outlines a road map for China to become
a world leader in advanced manufacturing (things like robotics, aircraft
and machine tools). Another plan calls for China to achieve dominance in
artificial intelligence. Based on similar initiatives, the Chinese have
already seen big wins. Americans invented the modern solar power
industry, but thanks to Chinese government intervention, China's solar
industry leads the world. So does its high-speed rail system.
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/18/technology/china-trade-tech.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Ftechnology&action=click&contentCollection=technology®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=sectionfront
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)