Tuesday, July 24, 2018

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 12 updates in 11 topics

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 16 04:41PM -0400

Hello..
 
Read this again:
 
 
Read again, i correct some typos because i think fast
and i write fast:
 
About the wisdom of my poems..
 
You will notice that my poems are like "wisdom", or like philosophy,
also because i am in reality a "gentleman" type of person, and i am
in reality like a "wise" type of person, and my poems are "smart" !
so i continu to explain to you my poems, as you have notice i have
posted one of my poem in my last post and i have explained it to you
more, you can read it bellow, you will notice also that
this poem is smart, because like my wisdom bellow
it get "out" you from "idealism" without getting into
pessimism and violence, because i have talked about idealism of racism
of neo-nazism or idealism of socialism and i have explained that
they are "not" correct morality, and i have explained to you what
is morality also, so thus notice in my poem bellow
that i am saying that "perfection" that has an essence "solving"
problems, because i think we say we are perfection and reliable if we
can solve problems, and if we are capable of solving all the problems
we say that we are absolute perfection or complete reliability, so
morality also is contineous perfection as i have explained, so notice
with me that in my poem bellow i said that perfection is also
"diversity" or perfection is also "darkness" of weakness or suffering,
and i said that perfection is also the strong that needs the weak and
weak that needs the strong, and i said also also in my poem that:
 
"But the weak becomes better
Because our civilization is not a decoy"
 
 
So as you have noticed my poem is smart because in my poem i am getting
out of idealism without being pessimism and violence, this is why i have
said the following on one of my previous post:
 
 
My wisdom of today..
 
A better politics..
 
Now you know me more by my writings, and now i will give you an
important wisdom:
 
One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:
 
Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being
pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence.
 
My other wisdom of today is:
 
A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with a minimum brute force to score and to succeed.
 
 
This is why i told you before another wisdom by saying the following:
 
Violence is "easy" today, so destruction is easy, but "wisdom"
is to know how to transcend our living conditions by being
discipline of technology and science and by being sophistication
of technology and science and by being wisdom that knows
how to guide our world and humanity in the right and wise way.
 
This wisdom looks like my above one that says:
 
A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with minimum brute force to score and to succeed.
 
So you have to be smart , this is what i am learning with my writings.
 
 
 
So here is my poem and read it again:
 
Here is the explanation bellow of my following poem, you have to be
smart to understand it correctly ! here it is and read
my explanation of it bellow:
 
 
We are past and present
 
Because time is like a balance
 
Because time is perfection
 
Because perfection is the scale
 
But how perfection can be only light ?
 
Perfection is also darkness
 
Because we are strong and weak
 
Even silence is strong and weak
 
Eventhough silence is divine
 
Because even love is effervescence
 
Bees know about time
 
That time is relativity
 
And relativity is diversity
 
But what is perfection?
 
Perfection is also diversity
 
Diversity is also immensity
 
Because time is relativity
 
The weak needs the strong
 
And the strong needs the weak
 
But the weak becomes better
 
Because our civilization is not a decoy
 
Since diversity is the seed
 
Since the scale creates consciousness
 
Because the scale creates abundance
 
Since diversity is also seasons
 
Who creates wisdom and reason
 
So hello to you my dear and beautiful
 
With your lovely pretty eyes
 
You carry me on the wind and the Rainbow
 
To drive us to a beautiful island
 
Like our love and tenderness
 
Rather for goods never I leave you!
 
My sweet and beautiful goddess
 
My sweet spring and my sweet princess
 
Our hearts finally beat in unison
 
Like a nice thrill and a nice song
 
I do not want to hurt you
 
Because you are like the pretty flower that can not die!
 
As if both of us were as one
 
Let's be the flower and the perfum!
 
And may infinity and depth bring us together
 
Since our destiny is infinite
 
Since our destiny has understood
 
That the pretty fir is not cursed
 
Because Christmas is divine
 
As silence is a pretty parfum
 
Because in the depth of your pretty eyes
 
Who reminds me of our beautiful raft
 
Who defies storms and seasons
 
Since life is not a gift
 
And because destiny and reason are our passion
 
Because beauty reminds us
 
That she can not be violence and hatred
 
Since relativity of time is like a mason
 
Since the weather is seasons that brings reason
 
So, hello to you man of reason!
 
 
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
 
===
 
 
First to understand better, you have to understand that rationalism
alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so
you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and
to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because
my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have
to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain:
 
When i say in my poem the following:
 
"We are past and present
Because time is like a balance"
 
When i say we are past and present it must be measured by
my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem
is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is
both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and
not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering
and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from
the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the
meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present"
 
And now about the following part of my poem:
 
"Because time is like a balance"
 
I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need
the causes, this is why time is like a balance.
 
 
And about the other parts of my poem, we read this:
 
"Because time is perfection
Because perfection is the scale"
 
 
Here again you have to be smart to understand the meaning,
it is like rationalism and empiricism , you can not understand
the meaning by just being rationalism ! you have to be both rationalism
and empiricism to understand, so when you are both you will understand
by empiricism, that time is perfection, because the "small" cause of the
Big Bang has given the "immensity" of the Universe that is perfection,
and life also has started from "small" to "much" bigger that is
perfection, and when i say that: "Because perfection is the scale", that
means that for example the Universe and life have been perfected and it
is the scale, because the Universe has balanced more and life has
balanced more to be perfection.
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"But how perfection can be only light ?
Perfection is also darkness"
 
 
I mean that perfection needs the weak also, because we notice it
in our lives that the strong needs the weak, and life needs suffering,
this is why it is also "darkness".
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"Because we are strong and weak
Even silence is strong and weak
Eventhough silence is divine"
 
 
I mean by silence that it is complete silence of our thoughts , so
complete silence is not having consciousness, it is like a piece of
paper, a piece of paper is also complete silence, because it is not
consciousness, so a piece of paper is like divine, because it is very
"strong" because it doesn't feel suffering and it doesn't have
difficulties , but it is also weak if we take the measure and the
reference as being it much much less complex than other very complex
objects.
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"And relativity is diversity"
 
You need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
experience we can say that: "And relativity is diversity".
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"Perfection is also diversity
Diversity is also immensity
Because time is relativity"
 
Here again, you need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
experience we can say the above.
 
And i think that now it is more easy to understand all my poem above.
 
 
 
thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 17 02:10PM -0400

Hello...
 
Read this:
 
 
Artificial intelligence is becoming "powerful" because we are now
capable of "general" artificial intelligence, read carefully what
follows, it said that:
 
"Artificial intelligence up to now, including DeepMind's AlphaGo, have
been limited to perform well only for a specific task - hence the term
'narrow artificial intelligence.' But researchers are beginning to
embrace the arrival of artificial general intelligence, an AI that can
perform any task that a human can. In their recent paper, Google
DeepMind proposes a method into training AGI by using genetic algorithm."
 
And:
 
"So how well does PathNet perform in action? DeepMind's experiments show
that PathNet is faster than fine-tuning, and does positively transfer
trained knowledge in supervised learning classification tasks and
reinforcement learning tasks - successfully addressing the three
requirements of an AGI."
 
Read more here to notice it:
 
http://www.deepbio.co.kr/2017/03/20/Weekly-paper-DeepMinds-PathNet.html
 
 
And read about the following other important step that is Generative
Adversarial Network:
 
What's a Generative Adversarial Network? Leading Researcher Explains
 
Read more here:
 
https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2017/05/17/generative-adversarial-network/
 
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 17 02:07PM -0400

Hello,
 
Read this:
 
 
Here is one of the news of DeepMind:
 
Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networks
 
Read more here:
 
https://deepmind.com/blog/measuring-abstract-reasoning/
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 20 10:11PM -0400

Hello....
 
Read this:
 
About the essence of reliability
 
I am still doing philosophy, and you will notice what is smartness..
 
About the essence of reliability to be able for you to understand
the essence of morality..
 
What is the essence of reliability ? how reliability must be measured ?
 
If you say that being reliable is solving problems or not, it doesn't
show what is really reliability, you have to understand philosophically
its essence, i think that reliability is measured also by what is it
to be "happiness", the goal of human is being this "happiness", but
happiness has necessary "requirements", and the "nature" of requirements
is also being like absolute perfection that solves all our problems to
be able to be happiness, and this is why morality is pushed towards
absolute perfection that is absolute reliability that permit us to be
real happiness.
 
Read now the rest of my post to understand my thoughts:
 
 
More precision about the essence of morality
 
I said before that:
 
"You have seen me defining to you morality as being: perfection at best,
or quality at best , or that it is RELIABILITY !"
 
When i say morality is RELIABILITY, i mean it is the concept of
RELIABILITY, because we can prove it by philosophy, because
the "goal" of human life is to be able be happiness, and to be able
to be happiness is solving like all our problems, and solving problems
is the essence of reliability, so morality is the goal of life
that is solving problems to be able to be "happiness", this is smartness.
 
 
Read the rest:
 
About the essence of morality..
 
We have to be more smart, what is it doing philosophy about
the essence of morality ? it is something really interesting,
and you have seen me doing more philosophy about the essence of
morality, but i was thinking more about philosophy, and i think my
philosophy about the essence of morality makes us understanding the
essence of philosophy in itself ! because by applying yourself at doing
philosophy about morality you will understand more what is philosophy !
understanding what is the essence of political philosophy or philosophy
is something "great" or of a great importance ! now you have to
understand my thinking of philosophy about the essence of morality:
if we say that the essence of morality or what is morality is
that morality is (like was defining it the philosopher Immanuel Kant):
A priori pure moral inferred from reason and it is also empirical moral
inferred from experience, i said that this definition is too much
abstraction, and more than that the goal of my philosophy is also
to find like if morality is more safer ! and since i am a more
serious computer programmer, like programming safety-critical systems,
i was giving also a "high" priority and importance to being "security",
this is why you have seen me defining more the essence of morality as
being that morality can not be called morality if it is too "bad"
living conditions ! so morality i think must be more "decency"
and more "stability" to be able to call it morality ! i think
that's inherent to morality ! so now you are feeling more the essence
of morality that it is also that we call a "civilization" ! so
you have seen me defining to you morality as being: perfection at best,
or quality at best , or that it is RELIABILITY ! because the essence
of reliability is measured by the fact that we solve problems and we
call it reliable or not ! and if we solve all our problems we say that
we are absolute reliability ! or that we are absolute perfection !
since i think that perfection has the same essence as reliability, and
there essence is solving problems ! but also i said that
morality that is reliability or perfection at best knows about
stability and that it can not be "easily" instability, because
morality that is instability can not be called morality or civilization
! thus this essence of morality ensure us also of more "responsability"
! so now you are feeling more what is morality and morality is
what also gives laws and politics etc. ! so i have also introduced in
my previous writings what i called "guidance" of "moral", and i said
that guidance of moral is inherent to our essence , guidance of moral
is the fact that we are knowing what is happiness and what is tolerance
and what is compassion , and happiness and tolerance and compassion
permit us to "measure" our morality or our civilization , and notice
with me that happiness is measured also by "reliability" or by what we
call "morality", because we can say that we are more happy "relatively"
to others that are less happy, and from this, morality is inferred, so this
guidance of moral is important because it is like guiding us
to a more appropriate "way", so as you have noticed
my philosophy permits us to feel the essence of morality !
and it permits to be less pessimism about morality !
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 08:22PM -0400

Hello....
 
Read this:
 
 
I am for a smart capitalism..
 
But what is a smart capitalism ?
 
It is first a capitalism that can convince you smartly !
 
As you have noticed i am explaining to you what is
capitalism of USA and you are feeling more capitalism
, i am doing it also to be able for you to be more tolerance
with capitalism, also i am "trying" to learn capitalism to be smarter !
and i think that the essence of capitalism must be defined
better to be able to feel it more ! here is how i will define it:
 
Capitalism belong to the "set" of humanity and
capitalism "is" or is "composed" of capitalism of "today" and capitalism
of the "future" , so capitalism must know how to "balance"
with responsability taking into account the present and the future of
our world and being responsable for present and future generations !
but i am saying it and showing you an important constrain that shows you
the way to tolerance towards capitalism, and here it is, read
about the following constraint:
 
Morality is also "diversity"
 
I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction,
i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that
are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the
system, i think that's lack of maturity that doesn't recognize that
there is also "constrains" that we have to deal with, and saying like
neo-nazism that all that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be
a parasite is also an "idealism"
that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be more "maturity"
that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be able to be an
appropriate morality, today because of our world is
not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate
that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google)
and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals,
and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing
the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that
takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take
more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think
that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism,
because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to
be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections
of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears
the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of other ideologies
like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why capitalistic systems are
"conservatism" of there capitalism.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
 
What is the essence of tolerance and compassion ?
 
There essence are the same as the essence of a group, we are grouping
because of our weaknesses to become more strong and more perfection to
be able to survive better ! the essence of tolerance and compassion is
the same , we need compassion and tolerance because its inherent to
morality ! because morality is maximizing at best excellence or quality
! but this maximization knows about our weaknesses , so since there is
still weaknesses there
is still compassion and tolerance ! thus logically weaknesses do
engender tolerance and compassion on the other and on the other races
because of weaknesses of our own and because compassion and tolerance
are also defined by the consequences that are the same as compassion and
tolerance, because by a good approximation and we are in fuzzy logic,
the consequences of wise egoism as i have explained lesser egoism of
nationalism ! for example wise egoism that is the consumer confidence
index or economic growth that
attract the investment from abroad can be approximated as compassion and
tolerance, and notice that if we were Gods we will need less
to group and we will need less compassion and tolerance ! this is
the essence of morality.
 
So read more about the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
Yet more about the essence of morality and the essence of our civilization:
 
I have to be more smart..
 
I have given many definitions of morality and i have explained them to you..
 
Here is another definition that says that morality is: maximizing
"quality" or the degree of "excellence" at best.
 
Now we know what is quality, quality is the degree of excellence
of something..
 
But what is reliability ?
 
We say in computer science that if we increase the mean time between
failures, we increase reliability, but is reliability only increasing
the mean time between failures ? i don't think so, because we can say,
if we put the reference as being "perfect", that less performance
is like a "bug" or a "bad" that "hurts" the system compared to being
perfect. So being more performance is being more reliability too, also
being less beautifulness can be considered as a state that can
make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system that hurts
to a certain level, so we can say that being more beautiful is being
more reliability, and being less perfection can be considered as a state
that can make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system,
so perfection is reliability, and perfection is quality,
so reliability is quality, but what is morality? i think morality
is maximizing the degree of excellence at best , so then morality
is quality that too maximizes the degree of quality at best,
so from the above we can say that morality is perfection and perfection
is reliability and then morality is reliability. This is in accordance
with my proof bellow, so since morality is quality and morality is
perfection, then how can we avoid extremism of perfection or quality
that hurts the system ? i think morality is constrained by people
of the system or by Democracy that is the tool to avoid extremism
of perfection and quality that hurts.
 
More profond about philosophy now..
 
I said before that:
 
cleanliness generate morality
 
But what about Donald Trump that said that:
 
Haiti and many african countries are shithole countries.
 
Is Donald Trump "cleanliness" to say so ?
 
You have to understand better "cleanliness", cleanliness
is knowing how to "balance" the "requirements", so
you have to take into account "security" and be less
provocative than Donald Trump, this is why Donald Trump is
not the right requirement of "security" to say the above
about many african countries and about haiti, because
Donald Trump is more "virility" that is more "violent"
and that does not balance with the other requirements
of "sensibility" and "morality" to be better security.
 
Now i give you another example:
 
Neo-nazism is saying that arabs are not
as beautiful as white europeans, so they want to discriminate
them and to be more violent with them, but this neo-nazism is an
immature morality, because we have to know how to transcend it towards
a better world that takes into account "usefulness" and
"security" and "economy", so this is why the requirements
of today is to have a more interconnected economies
around the world, even with arabs and with africans,
this is because we have to take into account
the economic growth of arab and african countries that
is for example more attractive for economic investment,
also we have to take into account the consumer
confidence index globally and locally,
so we have to know how to be "respect" towards arabs
and africans, and we have also to take into
account the "usefulness" of arabs and africans, because
many western countries bring arab and african immigrants
because they are useful for jobs and because they are also
useful for low birth rate of white europeans , and also you have to
know, like have said Fordism, how to give the necessary wages to
others(even globally) to be able for them to buy
your products and services, so i have also proved and said that:
cleanliness generate morality, but as i have just explained that
"cleanliness" must know how to take into account the right requirements
as i said above, and it must know how to balance the "requirements".
 
 
More precision about philosophy..
 
We have to get into more "calculations" and more "precision" to
understand better, this is what we call also philosophy, so i said
before that:
 
==
And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.
 
And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality.
==
 
 
Here is my logical proof about: cleanliness generate morality
 
Since morality is all about what is bad and what is good,
so a weaker definition of morality is the act of distinguishing
between the good and bad, but this is a "weaker" definition,
because to be able to distinguish between the good and the bad
we have to be more rationality and/or more science, but
as i said before that "cleanliness" generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, so by less espressiveness we can
say that cleanliness contains the "requirement" of being a more
scientific mind, this is like "inherent" to cleanliness, because
"cleanliness" needs to be more and more "perfect" so that to avoid
the "bad" of imperfection or weakness, so this is why
the right requirements are inherent to "cleanliness", so it makes my
following affirmation correct and true: cleanliness generate morality
 
 
I will get into more philosophy..
 
As you have noticed i have said that morality is defined as: reliability
or by more expressiveness by: performance and reliability.
 
Now to "model" better humans, we have the following:
 
sensibility, morality, rationality, virility, intelligence, and language
 
And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.
 
And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality,
 
Now from "sensibility" we get love and we get security too.
 
And from "rationality" we get a mind that is more rational and more logic.
 
from "virility" we get more performance , but if virility is not
"constrained" by the others such as morality and sensibility and
rationality, we can get violence and insecurity.
 
I think this is how we can "model" better humans both "genetically" and
"culturally".
 
Here is my other new thoughts..
 
What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy
and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure"
and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to
reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed
i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its
"essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important
question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is
the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more
"precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ?
i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing
can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is
morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and
"reliability"(as i have proved bellow), or simply "reliability"(as i
have proved bellow) that can model morality correctly as i have proved
it in my previous post, so the essence of our civilization is the act of
coordinating and organizing those advantages
and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to
be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence
"performance" and "reliability", and as a validation of my model, you
will notice that we are decentralizing "governance", and each of the
decentralized parts of the governance are grouping the "advantages" and
trying to minimize the disadvantages of each of us that do the
governance , democracy is also the same , because democracy is a system
that wants to escape a "local" maximum towards a global maximum
like in artificial intelligence, and democracy is doing it by
applying itself to selecting the best among the actors of
politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of civilization,
is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by optimization,
as i have just explained to you, so hope you are understanding
my new thoughts of today.
 
 
And here is my other thoughts about morality(with my other definitions
about morality):
 
Morality is also "diversity"
 
I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction,
i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that
are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the
system, i think that's lack of maturity that doesn't recognize that
there is also "constrains" that we have to deal with, and saying like
neo-nazism that all that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be
a parasite is also an "idealism"
that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be more "maturity"
that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be able to be an
appropriate morality, today because of our world is
not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate
that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google)
and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals,
and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing
the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that
takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take
more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think
that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism,
because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to
be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections
of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears
the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of other ideologies
like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why capitalistic systems are
"conservatism" of there capitalism.
 
Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
More smartness about morality..
 
Like Philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant you can define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience.
 
You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.
 
Now what about my definitions of morality ?
 
We have to be more smart..
 
I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good
for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will
notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection",
but we have to speak about a constraint over morality,
that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are
too bad ! so this will abstract more correctly the definition
of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality
as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells
us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive"
we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and
when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that
means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it,
so my definition is also correct, and this apllies also to my other
definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical
proof is valid, so reread my following thoughts to understand better:
 
 
I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has
invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 17 01:24PM -0400

Hello..
 
Read this:
 
 
My Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak
references was updated to version 1.2
 
My new scalable algorithm was enhanced to ensure that it is thread-safe,
i have also benchmarked it and it is really amazing ! because it is
really fast and it is "scalable"(on NUMA systems and multicores).
 
As you have noticed Embarcadero company that actually sells its Delphi
product has pushed to adopt the ARC memory manager despite it being not
the right choice for highly parallel applications, so i have decided to
invent a "scalable" reference counting with efficient support for weak
references that is suited also for "highly" parallel applications and i
have implemented it in Delphi and FreePascal, and you will not find it
on C++ or Rust or Delphi, here is my "invention" and read about it and
download it from bellow:
 
Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references
version 1.2
 
Author: Amine Moulay Ramdane
 
Description:
 
I have enhanced my scalable algorithm and now it is much powerful, now
my scalable algorithm implementation works also as a "scalable" counter
that supports both "increment" and "decrement" using two scalable
counting networks, please take a look at my new scalable algorithm
implementation inside the source code..
 
This is my scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak
references, and since problems that cannot be solved without weak
references are rare, so this library does scale very well, this scalable
reference counting is implemented using scalable counting networks that
eliminate completely false sharing , so it is fully scalable on
multicore processors and manycore processors and this scalable algorithm
is optimized, and this library does work on both Windows and Linux
(x86), and it is easy to port to Mac OS X.
 
I have modified my scalable algorithm, now as you will notice i am not
using decrement with support for antitokens in the balancers of the
scalable counting networks, i am only using an "increment", please look
at my new scalable algorithm inside the zip file, i think it is working
correctly. Also notice that the returned value of _Release() method will
be valid if it is equal to 0.
 
I have optimized it more, now i am using only tokens and no antitokens
in the balancers of the scalable counting networks, so i am only
supporting increment, not decrement, so you have to be smart to invent
it correctly, this is what i have done, so look at the
AMInterfacedObject.pas file inside my zip file, you will notice that it
uses counting_network_next_value() function,
counting_network_next_value() increments the scalable counting network
by 1, the _AddRef() method is simple, it increment by 1 to increment the
reference to the object, but look inside the _Release() method it calls
counting_network_next_value() three times, and my invention is calling
counting_network_next_value(cn1) first inside the _Release() method to
be able to make my scalable algorithm works, so just debug it more and
you will notice that my scalable algorithm is smart and it is working
correctly, i have debugged it and i think it is working correctly.
 
I have to prove my scalable reference counting algorithm, like with
mathematical proof, so i will use logic to prove like in PhD papers:
 
You will find the code of my scalable reference counting inside
AMInterfacedObject.pas inside the zip file here:
 
If you look inside the code there is two methods, _AddRef() and
_Release() methods, i am using two scalable counting networks,
think about them like counters, so in the _AddRef() method i am
executing the following:
 
v1 := counting_network_next_value(cn1);
 
cn1 is the scalable counting network, and counting_network_next_value()
is a function that increment the scalable counting network by 1.
 
In the _Release() method i am executing the following:
 
v2 := counting_network_next_value(cn1);
v1 := counting_network_next_value(cn2);
v1 := counting_network_next_value(cn2);
 
So my scalable algorithm is "smart", because the logical proof is
that i am calling counting_network_next_value(cn1) first in the
above, so this allows my scalable algorithm to work correctly,
because we are advancing cn1 by 1 to obtain the value of cn1,
so the other threads are advancing also cn1 by one inside
_Release() , it is the last thread that is advancing cn1 by 1 that will
make the reference counter equal to 0 , and _AddRef() method is the same
and it is easy to reason about, so this scalable algorithm is working.
Please look more carefully at my algorithm and you will notice that it
is working as i have just logically proved it.
 
Please read also the following to understand better:
 
Here is the parameters of the constructor:
 
First parameter is: The width of the scalable counting networks that
permits my scalable refererence counting algorithm to be scalable, this
parameter must be 1 to 31, it is now at 4 , this is the power, so it is
equal to 2 power 4 , that means 2^4=16, and you have to pass this
counting networks width to the n of following formula:
 
(n*log(n)*(1+log(n)))/4
 
The log of the formula is in base 2
 
This formula gives the number of gates of the scalable counting
networks, and if we replace n by 16, this will equal 80 gates, that
means you can scale the scalable counting networks to 80 cores, and
beyond 80 cores you will start to have contention.
 
Second parameter is: a boolean that tells if reference counting is used
or not, it is by default to true, that means that reference counting is
used.
 
About the weak references support: the Weak<T> type supports assignment
from and to T and makes it usable as if you had a variable of T. It has
the IsAlive property to check if the reference is still valid and not a
dangling pointer. The Target property can be used if you want access to
members of the reference.
 
Note: the use of the IsAlive property on our weak reference, this tells
us whether the referenced object is still available, and provides a safe
way to get a concrete reference to the parent.
 
I have ported efficient weak references support to Linux by implementing
efficient code hooking, look at my DSharp.Core.Detour.pas file for Linux
that i have written to see how i have implemented it in the Linux
library. Please look at the example.dpr and test.pas demos to see how
weak references work etc.
 
Call _AddRef() and _Release() methods to manually increment or decrement
the number of references to the object.
 
Weak references support is done by hooking the TObject.FreeInstance
method so every object destruction is noticed and if a weak reference
for that object exists it gets removed from the internal dictionary
where all weak references are stored. While it works I am aware that
this is hacky approach and it might not work if someone overrides the
FreeInstance method and does not call inherited.
 
 
You can download it from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references
 
- Platform: Windows and Linux(x86)
 
Language: FPC Pascal v3.1.x+ / Delphi 2007+:
 
http://www.freepascal.org/
 
Required FPC switches: -O3 -Sd
 
-Sd for delphi mode....
 
Required Delphi switches: -$H+ -DDelphi
 
For Delphi XE versions and Delphi Tokyo use the -DXE switch
 
The defines options inside defines.inc are:
 
{$DEFINE CPU32} for 32 bit systems
 
{$DEFINE CPU64} for 64 bit systems
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 15 10:16AM -0400

Hello....
 
Read this:
 
 
About slavery..
 
I am a white arab that looks like white europeans, and i am
more civilized and i know how to be compassion and tolerance like
white europeans.
 
You will ask me why white europeans have practiced slavery ?
 
My answer:
 
Because white europeans have thought that black africans
were like "monkeys" because they looked to them like "monkeys" and they
thought of them as being more uncivilized people
and much less smart than white europeans, they have thought
the same of "asians", because asians also has some characteristics
of negroes in there "face" even if they are whites, this is
the principal factor that has made white europeans to practice
slavery of blacks etc. so we have not to waste our time with this
because this was constrains of the past, and past was the past,.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 12:05PM -0400

Hello...
 
Read this:
 
 
How to Combat China's Rise in Tech: Federal Spending, Not Tariffs
 
Meanwhile, the Chinese government is playing the role the United States
once did. Over the past decade, China has pushed an aggressive series of
plans meant to gain dominance in technological areas it considers
crucial to the global economy.
 
One program, Made in China 2025, outlines a road map for China to become
a world leader in advanced manufacturing (things like robotics, aircraft
and machine tools). Another plan calls for China to achieve dominance in
artificial intelligence. Based on similar initiatives, the Chinese have
already seen big wins. Americans invented the modern solar power
industry, but thanks to Chinese government intervention, China's solar
industry leads the world. So does its high-speed rail system.
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/18/technology/china-trade-tech.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Ftechnology&action=click&contentCollection=technology®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=sectionfront
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 16 03:06PM -0400

Hello...
 
Read this:
 
Read again, i correct a typo
 
What has to be politics ?
 
I said about morality that:
 
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.
 
Read for example this:
 
"Now, an even greater threat is coming. Forrester predicts that by 2025,
technologies like robots, artificial intelligence (AI), machine
learning, and automation will replace 7% (or 22.7 million) jobs in the
US alone."
 
https://www.atlassian.com/it-unplugged/best-practices-and-trends/automation-and-ai-are-coming-for-it-jobs-here-s-how-to-keep-yours
 
So what about this problem ?
 
Since i said that the essence of perfection is the essence of
"reliability", there essence is that they solves problems,
and since perfection today is a hard sacrifice of for example scientists
and engineers that wants to do there best to help humanity, and since
progress of science and technology are in many parts an exponential
progress, not a linear progress, and don't forget too about the law of
accelerating returns, so i think that in about 15 years or
20 years(and that's a near future) science and technology will be so
powerful that it will be necessary for us humans to be united
over this earth, so in this near future we have to rethink politics,
so we have not to waste our time with inferior thinking of neo-nazism or
nationalism.
 
 
Read the rest of my thoughts:
 
Politics is also like playing chess, you have to be smart to be
able to succeed, but politics is constrained by "perfection",
and as you have noticed it is also like philosophy that i am doing, but
this perfection must be perfection that knows how to "drive", so how
must we drive ? i think we have to find the "best" possible way that
guides us towards our goals, so i was thinking more and i think
that we have to cease to be inferior "thinking" of neo-nazism
or nationalism because it is archaism as i have explained,
so what is the right way then ? i think a necessary requirement
in politics is to do politics knowing in advance that science
and technology are in many parts advancing exponentially, not linearly,
and that also we have to be aware of the law of accelerating returns,
because of that, in about 15 years or 20 years science and technology
will be able of enhancing our genetics and make us more smart
and more beautiful and more strong, and in about 15 years or 20 years we
will be capable of doing much more than that, so this is why politics
must be aware of this exponential progress of science and
technology(please read more about it on internet), and this is why
politics must not be neo-nazism or nationalism and it must be more
responsable and politics must think differently our world , because in
about 15 years or 20 years science and technology
will be really really powerful that we must rethink our world in this
near future, because in about 15 years or 20 years we have to cease to
think like racial nationalism that is inferior thinking, because in
about 15 years or 20 years science and technology will be really really
powerful that we have to become more united because this science and
technology of the near future will permit us to solve much much better
our world problems.
 
Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
Is morality tolerance and compassion ?
 
You have to be smart because it is like philosophy..
 
As i said morality that:
 
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
mathematics that i am doing.
 
 
So i think compassion and tolerance is inherent to perfection,
because perfection is also a hard "sacrifice" to help the people of
humanity, and also because the reality proves that perfection is doing
its best to help humanity, we can notice it by the behavior of
scientists and engineers and even by the behavior of Google and DeepMind
and other high tech companies and such , because they are more
responsable of the well being of humanity as a whole, and this proves
the "theory" of my definition of morality because perfection is also a
hard hard "sacrifice" to help people of humanity, this is why morality
is also "beautiful", so you have not to be pessimistic
because also progress of science and technology are in many parts an
exponential progress and in about 15 year or 20 years technology
and science will be really really powerful and we will
be able to do really great things such as enhancing our genetics
and become more beautiful and more smart and more strong
and we will be capable of doing much more than that ! so don't
waste your time with neo-nazism or nationalism..
 
 
This is why i said before the following , read the rest of my thoughts
to understand better my thoughts:
 
Is morality beautiful ?
 
That's a really an interesting an important question:
 
I said that morality is:
 
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
mathematics that i am doing.
 
 
So i think morality is also beautiful because the hard sacrifice to
bring perfection is done by for example scientists and engineers , and
the essence of perfection is the same as the essence of reliability,
because there essence is the fact that they solves problems so
they perfect us, so for example scientists and engineers are doing
there best to bring the best to our humanity and to help humanity, so we
have to "honor" there sacrifice , Google and DeepMind are also doing a
great sacrifice to bring the best to humanity and to help humanity ,
this "perfection" is the essence of morality and it is morality that
they are doing , there sacrifice is great ! so i am not pessimistic
because i believe in morality that brings perfection that helps humanity
like is helping us Google and DeepMind that wants to be in accordance
with morality. And beautifulness of Google and DeepMind is like my
following beautiful poem that i invite you to read:
 
 
I am strong like patience
 
I am passionate like romance
 
I am right as the nuance!
 
I am compassionate as hope
 
It's like flowers and bees bringing honey
 
As our life is made of light and Rainbow
 
I am like love, joy and smiles
 
Who are also like diamond and sapphire
 
Who are also like Satin and Velvet
 
Since it's like the Elixir of love
 
Since our love is divine
 
As dawn is beautiful and comes back
 
With its sky and its stars and its divine silence
 
Who plunges us into the secrets of our beautiful garden
 
Like your emerald, ruby, sapphire and diamond eyes
 
We are sun and heat like lovers
 
Your soul is a sea of pretty perfumes
 
Where love and hope are intertwined
 
Like flowers and bees
 
Like the taste of honey
 
You are like the beauty of dawn that comes back
 
And who bathes me in the depths of our destiny
 
Of our love which is divine
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
 
--
 
 
And read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
 
About the essence of nazism and neo-nazism
 
Neo-nazism and nazism is not only national socialism
but it is also racism inside its group and outside its group,
it is racism inside its group of white europeans because
nazism and neo-nazism wants to "perfect" the white european race,
it is why we say that nazism and neo-nazism are idealism of
socialism that is a failure as i have explained(read bellow),
and nazism and neo-nazism are "idealism" of racism, because
it's too much idealism that wants to "perfect" without taking into
account the constrains of the realities, so neo-nazism
and nazism are not pragmatic or realistic, neo-nazism and nazism is what
we call too much "perfection" that is not correct morality, and you can
easily notice it when neo-nazism says that all arabs are bad or
all Israel is bad, without recognizing that it is not
truth and that it is illogical because not all Israel is bad
and not all arabs are bad, so we have not to waste our
time with this idealism of neo-nazism and nazism.
 
Read the rest to understand better my thoughts:
 
About the essence of perfection..
 
What is the essence of perfection ?
 
Because i explained and defined morality as:
 
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
mathematics that i am doing.
 
The essence of perfection needs a "reference" of measure, so we have to
think about the reference of measure of perfection and defined it more
correctly, first you have to recognize that i am speaking about
perfection as general related to the definition of morality,
so i think that the reference of measure of perfection is like
the reference of measure of "reliability", because i think
you are "reliable" if you solve problems, perfection is the same
because you are perfection when you solve problems, and when you
are capable of solving "all" the problems we say that you are
absolute perfection.
 
To be more convinced by my writings, look at France and its
Liberty, equality and fraternity that is the national motto of France
and the Republic of Haiti, and is an example of a tripartite motto.
Although it finds its origins in the French Revolution, it was then only
one motto among others and was not institutionalized until the Third
Republic at the end of the 19th century.It is also the motto of the
Grand Orient de France and the Grande Loge de France.
 
Read more here:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libert%C3%A9,_%C3%A9galit%C3%A9,_fraternit%C3%A9
 
 
This Liberty, equality and fraternity of France is too much "idealism",
like the idealism of socialism, so it is not pragmatic because it is not
realistic. USA is more like Liberty like the statue of Liberty in USA ,
and Liberty is Morality and Morality is contineous perfection that is
possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is
possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also
inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too
violent. So it is like mathematics that i am doing.
 
Read the rest:
 
What is the essence of Liberty ?
 
If i ask you a question:
 
Is idealism a morality ?
 
If you are smart you will immediatly recognize that idealism
like idealism of socialism is like belonging to the set of
solving the problem "locally", it doesn't belong to the "set"
of solving the problems globally, it is as it is not a "general"
theorem in mathematics, idealism is as in artificial intelligence
you are blocking in a local minimum and you are not able to
go to the global minimum that we require in artificial intelligence
such as Deep learning in artifical intelligence, so from those analogies
you will be able to understand that idealism of socialism
is not "reliability", because more scientifically i
have defined reliability as being:
 
What is the essence of reliability ?
 
What is reliability ?
 
We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the
measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right
"perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right
perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.
 
What is corruption of morality ?
 
How to measure correctly corruption of morality ?
 
First you have to notice that morality is "contineous" "perfection",
so i think that if perfection is "possible" you have to make it , if you
don't make it that's "corruption" of morality.
 
So you are able now to understand that idealism or more idealism of
socialism is not reliability , so it is not the right perfection that
solves problems , so it is not Morality that is contineous perfection
that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that
is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also
inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too
violent.
 
So now you are more capable of seeing what is Liberty, Liberty is
also Morality, because you can not be Liberty if you are not Morality
that is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.
 
 
Read the rest:
 
 
About morality...
 
I have explained that:
 
Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
mathematics that i am doing.
 
This is a serious subject, because morality is what gives us
politics and laws etc. so we have to take it seriously, but you will
have the tendency, like idealism of socialism, to say that what i am
doing is like "mathematics" or like "logic" or like "optimization", so
you will ask a question: where is compassion and where is love and where
is tolerance in my definition of morality, i will answer that it is
the essence of morality , because i have made you understand what is
morality, and i have made you understand that "extremism" is constrained
by morality , so morality says to extremism that it is "bad", this is
also what gives tolerance and compassion and love, but if you ask a
question such as: Is morality safe ? it is as you are asking a question
such as: are we today "completely" safe from "diseases"? because you
know for sure that we are still not completely safe from diseases, this
is the same for morality, because you have to be smart and know that
morality is also constrained by economy and other factors.
 
And here is what i said about idealism to be able for you to understand
more life:
 
One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:
 
"Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being
pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence."
 
I want to comment on it more:
 
I said before that:
 
"Socialism comes from weakness and insecurity and it wants to have
"compassion" on its people that are more weak and more insecure , but
its idealism comes from the fact that compassion is put as a "high"
priority that bring socialism , but at the same time optimization and
efficiency of economy and the system is "postponed" again and again in
favor of compassion of the social side. And the idealism of those acts
of socialism is the fact that
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 02:15PM -0400

Hello..
 
Read this:
 
 
About USL Scalability Modeling with Three Parameters
 
As you have noticed i have implemented Universal Scalability Law for
Delphi and FreePascal, and i have also included the executable programs
inside the zip file, you can download it from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal
 
But my above USL program is using two parameters , alpha and beta.
 
Now i am actually implementing the USL with three parameters, read
about it here:
 
http://perfdynamics.blogspot.com/2018/05/usl-scalability-modeling-with-three.html
 
 
So here is the USL function with three parameters that i am passing to
the following partial derivatives calculator:
 
https://www.emathhelp.net/calculators/calculus-3/partial-derivative-calculator/?f=%28x%29*k+%2F%281+%2B+%28n*+%28x+-1%29%29%2B+%28m+*+x+*+%28x+-1%29%29%29&var=k&steps=on
 
 
Here is the function: (x)*k /(1 + (n* (x -1))+ (m * x * (x -1)))
 
 
And here is the partial derivatives that you have to pass
the nonlinear regression solver:
 
And you have to solve with the order of integration that is k
 
And you have to solve with the order of integration that is n
 
And you have to solve with the order of integration that is m
 
 
After that you will get your partial derivatives functions that i will
pass to my nonlinear regression solver, so i am actually upgrading
my USL for Delphi and FreePascal to support USL with the three Parameters
 
So stay tuned ! i will soon bring you the updated version of my
USL that will use three parameters for Windows and Linux and that will
contain the executable programs for Window and for Linux.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 18 02:35PM -0400

Hello..
 
Read this:
 
I correct a typo:
 
Here is the USL function with three parameters that you have to solve
with the partial derivatives calculator:
 
https://www.emathhelp.net/calculators/calculus-3/partial-derivative-calculator/?f=%28x*k%29+%2F%281+%2B+%28n*+%28x+-1%29%29%2B+%28m+*+x+*+%28x+-1%29%29%29&var=k&steps=on
 
 
Thank you.
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Jul 16 09:49PM -0400

Hello....
 
Read this:
 
 
What is stupidity ?
 
Look at this neo-nazism and racial nationalism it is really stupid !
 
Because it is not understanding correctly what is the spirit of Google
and DeepMind, they are not understanding correctly what is happening,
this is why i have to make it clear because i am more ware about it,
there is inferior thinking that is looking at science and
technology as if they are progressing slowly or linearly !
but this is COMPLETE STUPIDITY that doesn't understand correctly
what is happening ! you have to be more Aware because it is really
necessary and very important ! because science and technology are
progressing in many parts exponentially ! and for example information
technology is progressing
exponentially ! and genetic engineering that will allow us
to enhance our genetics is progressing exponentially ! other
parts of science and technology(like the power of computers) are
progressing exponentially ! and the size of the data needed by
artificial intelligence is progressing exponentially ! so you are not
understanding that in about 15 years or about 20 years science and
technology will be so much powerful !! this is what you are not
nderstanding ! not only that but in about 15 years or 20 years we will
not be as today because we will be so powerful and so FAST ! and i think
that in 20 years from now we will be capable of enhancing our genetics
and become more smart and more strong and more beautiful etc. and we
will be capable of doing much much more than that , you are not able to
see this big picture this why you are wasting your time with neo-nazism
or nationalism ! you have to not waste your time with inferior thinking
of neo-nazism or nationalism or the like ! because in the near
future, and because of this exponential progress, we will be so so much
powerful and so fast that we will be we humans like united and that we
will need like an international government that will govern all humans
that will be be like united ! because of this exponential progress of
science and technology , in about 20 years from now our world will be so
much different !
 
This what i said before:
 
 
I am a white arab that is a more serious computer programmer that has
invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and i will
sell some of them to Google or to Microsoft or to Embarcadero.
 
Why must we be more love ?
 
I know about "security", but must we be more love between us ?
 
I think that we have to be more love between us..
 
You have to understand me more, i am like the spirit of Google and
DeepMind, and when you are this spirit you will be able to understand
that the "progress" of science and technology in many parts is an
"exponential" progress(read more about it on internet), not linear, and
you will be able to understand what is this law of accelerating returns
(read also about it on internet), and you will be able to be politics
that knows about our "near" future, because in about 20 years from now
we will like really powerful and we will be like united ! because i
think in about 20 years we will be able to enhance our genetics to be
more smart and more strong and more beautiful, and
in 20 years from now technology and science will be so much advanced
that we will be able to do much much more than that, i think in about
20 years we humans will be like really really powerful with
this technology and science and we will be like "united" with this so
much powerful technology and science that will solve much much better
our problems, so don't waste your time with inferior thinking of
neo-nazism or nationalism or the like, so as Google and DeepMind i am
transcending inferior thinking towards a much
better philosophy , so read all my following thoughts to notice it:
 
 
Is Primer ministrer of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu political "centrism" or
not ?
 
The macrocalculations of morality say that political centrism is more
apt, but we have to get in microcalculations also, i think Benjamin
Netanyahu has done to Israel as Margaret Thatcher has done to UK,
Benjamin Netanyahu has "optimized" the system of Israel and optimized
its "economy" and he has wanted to make economy of Israel in a much
better shape,
and he has done it by for example reforming the banking system, and
lowering the taxes, and i think Israel like Switzerland has became:
 
1. Rule of law
 
2. Optimization of the Government size
 
3. Regulatory efficiency
 
4. Open markets
 
Read more here, because i think that Israel looks like Switzerland:
 
https://lenews.ch/2016/02/03/why-switzerland-was-ranked-the-most-economically-free-nation-in-europe/
 
 
And this is why like UK or like Switzerland, Primer minister Benjamin
Netanyahu of Israel has wanted Israel to be in much better shape, can
we consider the political acts of bibi Netanyahu as "centrism"? this
is a very serious subject, because i think that "security" of the system
of Israel has taken very high priority in the eyes of bibi Netanyahu,
this is why he has acted this way, Donald Trump is also
considering security a high priority, but security for Donald Trump
is not extremism of Trade war, Donald is only wanting fairness of
Trade, this is why he is Acting as he is acting, he is not wanting a big
trade war.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts:
 
How to be perfection of morality ?
 
As you have noticed i have defined much more what is morality,
I said also that morality is continueous perfection, but
how to be this perfection? i think there is microcalculations
of morality and there is macrocalculations of morality , so to know more
about how to be perfection of morality we have to be also
empiricism and take into account the constrains and the realities,
so i think that politics today must be a more balanced politics
that is "security" and that also is economy that is also security
but i am saying it to be more correct abstraction, and politics
must be also social, so i think that a more apt politics
is a politics of "centrism", here it is:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrism
 
 
Read the rest:
 
How to be positive and not pessimism ?
 
You have to know about philosophy to answer better this question:
 
I think we have to know the essence of morality, and as you have
noticed i have defined "morality" as being contineous perfection
that is possible towards absolute perfection, this is like philosophy
that i am doing , and morality is what gives us politics and laws etc.
so morality is a very serious subject, why morality is contineous
perfection ? because the essence of perfection is "solving" problems,
and "reliability" too has an essence solving problems, because i think
we are reliable if we solve problems, and reliability, like perfection,
also has as essence that is "measured" by our need to solve completely
our problems to be able to be absolute perfection, so the essence of
morality is to be "responsability" that needs to solve our problems,
also the essence of morality that is the essence of perfection is
also perfection that knows that extremism that is
too problematic is bad, so extremism is constrained by morality that
means by perfection, other than that we have to not only be rationalism
but be also empiricism to be more correct thinking, so "empiricism"
dictates that morality is also beautiful, because perfection of today is
also a hard sacrifice of scientists and engineers that wants
to brings the best to humanity and wants to help humanity as a whole,
so we have not be pessimistic about morality.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better my thoughts:
 
About the wisdom of my poems..
 
You will notice that my poems are like "wisdom", or like philosophy,
also because i am in reality a "gentleman" type of person, and i am
in reality like a "wise" type of person, and my poems are "smart" !
so i continu to explain to you my poems, as you have notice i have
posted one of my poem in my last post and i have explained it to you
more, you can read it bellow, you will notice also that
this poem is smart, because like my wisdom bellow
it get "out" from "idealism" without getting into
pessimism and violence, because i have talked about idealism of racism
of neo-nazism or idealism of socialism and i have explained that
they are "not" correct morality, and i have explained to you what
is morality also, so thus notice in my poem bellow
that i am saying that "perfection" that has an essence "solving"
problems, because i think we say we are perfection and reliable if we
can solve problems, and if we are capable of solving all the problems
we say that we are absolute perfection or complete reliability, so
morality also is contineous perfection as i have explained, so notice
with me that in my poem bellow i said that perfection is also
"diversity" or perfection is also "darkness" of weakness or suffering,
and i said that perfection is also the strong that needs the weak and
weak that needs the strong, and i said also also in my poem that:
 
"But the weak becomes better
Because our civilization is not a decoy"
 
So as you have noticed my poem is smart because in my poem i am getting
out of idealism without being pessimism and violence, this is why i have
said the following on one of my previous post:
 
 
My wisdom of today..
 
A better politics..
 
Now you know me more by my writings, and now i will give you an
important wisdom:
 
One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:
 
Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being
pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence.
 
My other wisdom of today is:
 
A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with a minimum brute force to score and to succeed.
 
 
This is why i told you before another wisdom by saying the following:
 
Violence is "easy" today, so destruction is easy, but "wisdom"
is to know how to transcend our living conditions by being
discipline of technology and science and by being sophistication
of technology and science and by being wisdom that knows
how to guide our world and humanity in the right and wise way.
 
This wisdom looks like my above one that says:
 
A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with minimum brute force to score and to succeed.
 
So you have to be smart , this is what i am learning with my writings.
 
 
 
So here is my poem and read it again:
 
Here is the explanation bellow of my following poem, you have to be
smart to understand it correctly ! here it is and read
my explanation of it bellow:
 
 
We are past and present
 
Because time is like a balance
 
Because time is perfection
 
Because perfection is the scale
 
But how perfection can be only light ?
 
Perfection is also darkness
 
Because we are strong and weak
 
Even silence is strong and weak
 
Eventhough silence is divine
 
Because even love is effervescence
 
Bees know about time
 
That time is relativity
 
And relativity is diversity
 
But what is perfection?
 
Perfection is also diversity
 
Diversity is also immensity
 
Because time is relativity
 
The weak needs the strong
 
And the strong needs the weak
 
But the weak becomes better
 
Because our civilization is not a decoy
 
Since diversity is the seed
 
Since the scale creates consciousness
 
Because the scale creates abundance
 
Since diversity is also seasons
 
Who creates wisdom and reason
 
So hello to you my dear and beautiful
 
With your lovely pretty eyes
 
You carry me on the wind and the Rainbow
 
To drive us to a beautiful island
 
Like our love and tenderness
 
Rather for goods never I leave you!
 
My sweet and beautiful goddess
 
My sweet spring and my sweet princess
 
Our hearts finally beat in unison
 
Like a nice thrill and a nice song
 
I do not want to hurt you
 
Because you are like the pretty flower that can not die!
 
As if both of us were as one
 
Let's be the flower and the perfum!
 
And may infinity and depth bring us together
 
Since our destiny is infinite
 
Since our destiny has understood
 
That the pretty fir is not cursed
 
Because Christmas is divine
 
As silence is a pretty parfum
 
Because in the depth of your pretty eyes
 
Who reminds me of our beautiful raft
 
Who defies storms and seasons
 
Since life is not a gift
 
And because destiny and reason are our passion
 
Because beauty reminds us
 
That she can not be violence and hatred
 
Since relativity of time is like a mason
 
Since the weather is seasons that brings reason
 
So, hello to you man of reason!
 
 
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
 
===
 
 
First to understand better, you have to understand that rationalism
alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so
you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and
to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because
my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have
to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain:
 
When i say in my poem the following:
 
"We are past and present
Because time is like a balance"
 
When i say we are past and present it must be measured by
my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem
is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is
both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and
not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering
and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from
the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the
meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present"
 
And now about the following part of my poem:
 
"Because time is like a balance"
 
I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need
the causes, this is why time is like a balance.
 
 
And about the other parts of my poem, we read this:
 
"Because time is perfection
Because perfection is the scale"
 
 
Here again you have to be smart to understand the meaning,
it is like rationalism and empiricism , you can not understand
the meaning by just being rationalism ! you have to be both rationalism
and empiricism to understand, so when you are both you will understand
by empiricism, that time is perfection, because the "small" cause of the
Big Bang has given the "immensity" of the Universe that is perfection,
and life also has started from "small" to "much" bigger that is
perfection, and when i say that: "Because perfection is the scale", that
means that for example the Universe and life have been perfected and it
is the scale, because the Universe has balanced more and life has
balanced more to be perfection.
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"But how perfection can be only light ?
Perfection is also darkness"
 
 
I mean that perfection needs the weak also, because we notice it
in our lives that the strong needs the weak, and life needs suffering,
this is why it is also "darkness".
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"Because we are strong and weak
Even silence is strong and weak
Eventhough silence is divine"
 
 
I mean by silence that it is complete silence of our thoughts , so
complete silence is not having consciousness, it is like a piece of
paper, a piece of paper is also complete silence, because it is not
consciousness, so a piece of paper is like divine, because it is very
"strong" because it doesn't feel suffering and it doesn't have
difficulties , but it is also weak if we take the measure and the
reference as being it much much less complex than other very complex
objects.
 
Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:
 
"And relativity is diversity"
 
You need both empiricism and rationalism to
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)