- cmsg cancel <43a46e60-e0ba-482c-b2a4-0120b0ada6c0@googlegroups.com> - 14 Updates
- More "philosophy" about parallel computing and computing.. - 1 Update
- I correct a typo: i wrote "transcendance" in french, i mean trascendence in english, so i correct and read again - 1 Update
- More about philosophy of computing.. - 1 Update
- What is smartness in computing or parallel computing ? - 1 Update
- My SemaCondvar and SemaMonitor version 2.2 are here.. - 1 Update
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:46AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:46AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:46AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:47AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:47AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:47AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:47AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:47AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:47AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:47AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:48AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:48AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:48AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Aug 12 07:48AM Article d'annulation posté via Nemo. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 11 05:11PM -0700 Hello, More "philosophy" about parallel computing and computing.. As you have noticed in my previous post i have just spoken about the local views and understanding and the global views and understanding, those are important characteristics of smartness of computing, i give you an example, look at how i am explaining the following (and read the rest in what's following): ============================================================== More about research and software development.. I have just looked at the following new video: Why is coding so hard... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAAXwrgd1U8 I am understanding this video, but i have to explain my work: I am not like this techlead in the video above, because i am also an "inventor" that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementions, i am also inventing effective abstractions, i give you an example: Read the following of the senior research scientist that is called Dave Dice: Preemption tolerant MCS locks https://blogs.oracle.com/dave/preemption-tolerant-mcs-locks As you are noticing he is trying to invent a new lock that is preemption tolerant , but his lock lacks some important characteristics, this is why i have just invented a new Fast Mutex that is adaptative and that is much much better and i think mine is the "best", and i think you will not find it anywhere, my new Fast Mutex has the following characteristics: 1- Starvation-free 2- Good fairness 3- It keeps efficiently and very low the cache coherence traffic 4- Very good fast path performance (it has the same performance as the scalable MCS lock when there is contention.) 5- And it has a decent preemption tolerance. this is how i am an "inventor", and i have also invented other scalable algorithms such as a scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references, and i have invented a fully scalable Threadpool, and i have also invented a Fully scalable FIFO queue, and i have also invented other scalable algorithms and there inmplementations, and i think i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or Embarcadero or such software companies. Read my following writing to know me more: More about computing and parallel computing.. The important guaranties of Memory Safety in Rust are: 1- No Null Pointer Dereferences 2- No Dangling Pointers 3- No Buffer Overruns I think i have solved Null Pointer Dereferences and also solved Dangling Pointers and also solved memory leaks for Delphi and Freepascal by inventing my "scalable" reference counting with efficient support for weak references and i have implemented it in Delphi and Freepascal, and reference counting in Rust and C++ is "not" scalable. About the (3) above that is Buffer Overruns, read here about Delphi and Freepascal: What's a buffer overflow and how to avoid it in Delphi? http://delphi.cjcsoft.net/viewthread.php?tid=49495 And I have just read the following web page: https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1252175/Fixing-Delphis-Interface-Limitations But i don't agree with the writting of the guy of the above web page, because i think you have to understand the "spirit" of Delphi, here is why: A component is supposed to be owned and destroyed by something else, "typically" a form (and "typically" means in english: in "most" cases, and this is the most important thing to understand). In that scenario, reference count is not used. If you pass a component as an interface reference, it would be very unfortunate if it was destroyed when the method returns. Therefore, reference counting in TComponent has been removed. Also because i have just added TAMInterfacedPersistent to my invention. To use scalable reference counting with Delphi and FreePascal, just replace TInterfacedObject with my TAMInterfacedObject that is the scalable reference counted version, and just replace TInterfacedPersistent with my TAMInterfacedPersistent that is the scalable reference counted version, and you will find both my TAMInterfacedObject and my TAMInterfacedPersistent inside the AMInterfacedObject.pas file, and to know how to use weak references please take a look at the demo that i have included called example.dpr and look inside my zip file at the tutorial about weak references, and to know how to use delegation take a look at the demo that i have included called test_delegation.pas, and take a look inside my zip file at the tutorial about delegation that learns you how to use delegation. I think my Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references is stable and fast, and it works on both Windows and Linux, and my scalable reference counting scales on multicore and NUMA systems, and you will not find it in C++ or Rust, and i don't think you will find it anywhere, and you have to know that this invention of mine solves the problem of dangling pointers and it solves the problem of memory leaks and my scalable reference counting is "scalable". And please read the readme file inside the zip file that i have just extended to make you understand more. You can download my new scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references version 1.37 from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references ================================================================ So as you are noticing that smartness of computing is also that we are also the process of going from the local view and understanding to the general or global view and understanding that is more efficient, this is why you are noticing that scientists are first studying equipping themselves with local views and understanding and also with smartness they are going further to a more global view and understanding , and also this permits them to invent more efficient inventions like i am doing above with my new invention of my Fast Mutex. This is why i said the following: I said before: What is smartness in computing or parallel computing ? I think being smart at computing or parallel computing is also what we call smartness , but what is it ? I think you have to analyze my below SemaMonitor and SemaCondvar to notice that it is also smartness, because what i am doing in my below software project is like playing "smartly" at the game of chess to be able to be successful, so if you are noticing in my below software project that i am constructing like a "protocol" that is efficient, this protocol is based on a language constituted of efficient commands, it is also like a sophisticated automaton that is constructed with smartness, and this sophisticated automaton permits an efficient protocol that is based on an efficient language that must be able to allow us to "express" "efficiently"(with smartness) what we want, this is what i am doing in my software project below, and the inner of the sophisticated automaton must be efficient (notice also that i am garbage collecting efficiently inside the wait() method), and notice how i am thinking it smartly, i am like finding the different ways of the game of chess and after that "organizing" and "managing" so that to be successful, and it is what we call smartness. Look at the source code of my following new SemaCondvar and SemaMonitor version 2.2 to notice it: My SemaCondvar and SemaMonitor version 2.2 are here.. Now i think they are working perfectly, and notice that i have changed a little bit there interface. Please read the readme file to know how to use them. You can download them from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/semacondvar-semamonitor And the lightweight version is here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/light-weight-semacondvar-semamonitor If i say to you the following: I need an efficient protocol to express efficiently this or that.. This is a good way to understand more computing, because you are feeling that it needs transcendence and it needs smartness to compose, this is the same for morality, you have to be able to define the rules of morality , but this needs global views and understanding and local views and understanding, this is how is smartness of computing, because when i invented and implemented my SemaMonitor and SemaCondvar, i needed to be capable local understanding and views of how to implement a Semaphore and how to implement an Eventcount and how to implement a condition variable and how to implement windows event objects and make them portable, and i needed also to be capable of a global understanding and view so that to combine them efficiently and combine them also in an efficient protocol, so as you are noticing that smart computing needs transcendence and smartness and efficiency, and speaking about efficiency , i invite you to read my following thoughts of my political philosophy: But you have to be capable of philosophy to understand more, because read my following thoughts about other requirements that are important: What is happening in my brain ? I will speak more about me so that you understand my way of doing since it is also like my philosophy, to be more smart you have to be capable of reducing efficiently "complexity" so that to be efficient and so that to be more successful, but how can you do it ? you have to be able to know about the steps that guides you into the right direction, first i will speak about my way so that you understand me better, first step you have to be able to "prioritize" efficiently, because to be able to be successful you have to prioritize, so look for example at me, i have decided to "study" more and to study more "efficiently" so that to be more successful, but this is not "sufficient" to know, because to be able to be efficient at reducing complexity you have to be able to be efficiently selective of your knowledge, and this efficiently "selective" has to adhere in its turn to the process of being efficient at reducing "complexity", so you have to be able to select "efficiently" "efficient" knowledge that is more "easy" to learn so that to reduce complexity, thus you have to be able to ask "questions" to this or that right persons to be able to be efficient at selecting your "knowledge", next step you have to be "tenacity" at studying efficiently and you have to study more and more and you have to ask questions to your professors and next step after you have been able to learn more and more you have to be able at being efficient at "reusability" of your efficient knowledge and this is a very important step , so don't neglect efficient "reusability" of your knowledge, this is also the steps that i have followed and i have also used my "smartness" to be more efficient. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 11 04:37PM -0700 Hello, I correct a typo: i wrote "transcendance" in french, i mean trascendence in english, so i correct and read again: More about philosophy of computing.. I said before: ===================================================================== What is smartness in computing or parallel computing ? I think being smart at computing or parallel computing is also what we call smartness , but what is it ? I think you have to analyze my below SemaMonitor and SemaCondvar to notice that it is also smartness, because what i am doing in my below software project is like playing "smartly" at the game of chess to be able to be successful, so if you are noticing in my below software project that i am constructing like a "protocol" that is efficient, this protocol is based on a language constituted of efficient commands, it is also like a sophisticated automaton that is constructed with smartness, and this sophisticated automaton permits an efficient protocol that is based on an efficient language that must be able to allow us to "express" "efficiently"(with smartness) what we want, this is what i am doing in my software project below, and the inner of the sophisticated automaton must be efficient (notice also that i am garbage collecting efficiently inside the wait() method), and notice how i am thinking it smartly, i am like finding the different ways of the game of chess and after that "organizing" and "managing" so that to be successful, and it is what we call smartness. Look at the source code of my following new SemaCondvar and SemaMonitor version 2.2 to notice it: My SemaCondvar and SemaMonitor version 2.2 are here.. Now i think they are working perfectly, and notice that i have changed a little bit there interface. Please read the readme file to know how to use them. You can download them from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/semacondvar-semamonitor And the lightweight version is here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/light-weight-semacondvar-semamonitor ================================================================== If i say to you the following: I need an efficient protocol to express efficiently this or that.. This is a good way to understand more computing, because you are feeling that it needs transcendence and it needs smartness to compose, this is the same for morality, you have to be able to define the rules of morality , but this needs global views and understanding and local views and understanding, this is how is smartness of computing, because when i invented and implemented my SemaMonitor and SemaCondvar, i needed to be capable local understanding and views of how to implement a Semaphore and how to implement an Eventcount and how to implement a condition variable and how to implement windows event objects and make them portable, and i needed also to be capable of a global understanding and view so that to combine them efficiently and combine them also in an efficient protocol, so as you are noticing that smart computing needs transcendence and smartness and efficiency, and speaking about efficiency , i invite you to read my following thoughts of my political philosophy: About white supremacism and neo-nazism.. I am more capable at political philosophy, and i think i understand the "defect" of white supremacism and neo-nazism, it is about "morality", and as i defined morality by two abstractions that are: Perfection at best and with Efficiency and the correct compassion and love that is inherent to efficiency (read more below to understand), so i think the defect of white supremacism and neo-nazism, is that they want to be white supremacism so they have the "tendency" like neo-nazism to be "radicalism" of "perfection" that is "too" violent with humans imperfections (but notice that we can not be confident with there violent behavior towards human imperfections), so they are like ideologies of radicalism that are evil over this earth, because they are not understanding the basis of our today civilization, our today civilization is also more patience and more tolerance and our today civilization is more positive because it believes that science and technology will soon be able to solve many of our problems because of the exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns that are so fast, so our today civilization is more positive and more confident, and read what i wrote before about being civilized: Now what is it to be civilized ? This is a smart question.. You have to understand deeply our kind of civilization to be able to answer this question, i think that our kind of civilization is wanting to "maximize" at best by "effort" the avoidance of savagery even if we are still savagery here and there, you have to be able able to understand how to prioritize to be able to succeed ! i think that our kind of civilization is giving a weight of great importance to the fact of avoiding savagery at best by effort, so this principle doesn't contradict the fact that even if we are still savagery here and there we have to maximize at best the avoidance of savagery by "effort", and also this principle has to be in accordance with the fact that we have to be the right "stability" to be able to call a society a society or a country a country, so this is why we are noticing that we are being a kind of "tolerance" and we are a social system and we are a health care system in our kind of civilization. So to be in accordance with the principle above you are understanding that we have to be efficient and much organized to be able to be this principle in action, this is why i am not in accordance with neo-nazism or white supremacism, because they are inferiority of morality that doesn't understand the requirements of our today "civilization", so white supremacists and neo-nazis have to adapt because they are too much violence. Yet about meritocracy and elitism.. I wrote previously the following: "More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy.. The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy. But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what kind of meritocracy do we have to have ? Because as you are noticing that i said below: "You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism"" And to be more "smart" look "carefully" at my following poem that i wrote previously that talks about the above problem: === Look at the more "individual" perfection It can become an imperfection Since more "awareness" of imperfections that is more individual perfection Can make us hate and discriminate our imperfections And since we are many of us made also of imperfections So this can make "us" more disorganized and less perfection And that's an "important" problem that needs an "attention" So this is why morality is calling for "actions" This is why laws are our security and a right prevention And this weakness must become a beautiful ascension So you have to see it better in many more dimensions ! Since it is like running away from the pain of detention ! So as you see there is no pretension So hope that there is no incomprehension ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. ==== Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand better: More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy.. The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy. But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what kind of meritocracy do we have to have ? Because as you are noticing that i said below: "You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism" So you are noticing more what kind of Elitism and Meritocracy we have to be. So you have to be careful with the kind of Elitism and Meritocracy that we want to have. And you have to know how to navigate efficiently like a "pro", this is why you have to get into "realtime" and "dynamic" calculations to get better at efficiency, being correct professionalism needs from us to take responsability very "seriously", so you have to avoid to be lazy , because it is a work of everyday, look for example at how we are being synchronized much more efficiently etc. so you are noticing that our today lives are synchronized much more efficiently and our today lives needs to be much more "efficient" because today life needs from us to be much more smart and much more efficient than our past history, so as you are noticing that it is like our today is based on much more efficiency than past history and this doesn't contradict my following thoughts of my political philosophy, so read it again: More political philosophy about order.. I think you are understanding me more, but you are feeling more and more that i am also an Elitist, but you have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism, i am a proactive Elitism that talks to the people and that understand the living conditions of people, and that wants people to be "efficiency", and to be able to be efficiency you have to know how to be order, order is also following the rule of: People needs efficiency ! so order has to know how to follow rules of efficiency ! this is what i am talking about in my political philosophy: is how to be efficiency ! this is why you have also seen me talking in my political philosophy about what is morality and what is efficiency and is compassion and love inherent to efficiency (but notice that efficiency here is about humans that are efficient and that governs), so you have to understand me more, this is why you have to read my following thoughts of my political philosophy: About love and order.. As you are noticing i am "playing" with words when i am doing political philosophy, for example i am saying that i have defined morality by two abstractions that are: "Perfection at best" and with Efficiency and compassion and love that are inherent to efficiency. But you will ask the following question: Is it logical to say that compassion and love are inherent to efficiency ? You have to understand political philosophy, when i say love in political philosophy , love must "satisfy" "order", and order is primordial ! but what is order ? In political philosophy, order is a maximization at best of order ! so now you are understanding that there is no logical contradiction in my writing, this is why you are noticing that i am saying below the following: === Is compassion or love inherent to efficiency ? This is a very important question in political philosophy, so how can we answer it? i will start to answer it like this: Notice that in a society that we form (like in a country), we are also trying to "unite" so that to avoid desorder and its violence, so from this kind of "unification" we can say that a decent compassion and a decent love that is considered decent by morality and by the people is inherent to efficiency in politics so that to avoid desorder and its violence ! (read the rest of my thoughts below to understand more) == About democracy and corruption.. Corruption is Inducement to wrong by improper or unlawful means. Read the definition of corruption here to notice it: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corruption So as i am explaining below that democracy depends on and is guided by morality that i defined with two abstraction that are: "Perfection at best" and with Efficiency and compassion and love that are inherent to efficiency (read below to understand), hence we can say that corruption is also "lack" of efficiency that doesn't follow the rule of morality that is: The people needs efficiency. So when i say below that: === How must we think democracy in political philosophy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption, we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best. === Corruption above also means that it is lack of efficiency. Read the rest of my thoughts to understand more: More political philosophy about democracy.. Is democracy the best thing to do ? Here is what i said before, and my today answer is below: ======================================================= How must we think democracy in political philosophy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption, we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best. And now about to technocracy or to not technocracy ? This is a really good subject of political philosophy, and answering it permits us to understand better our actual democracies, this is why i will continu to answer this question: I said before the following: Because you have to notice that technocracy needs utilitarianism and this kind of utilitarianism of technocracy needs "dictatorship", so technocracy is not democracy and technocracy is dictatorship, and this dictatorship can cause problems of more violence inside the society. Also this kind of utilitarianism of technocracy is something problematic because it has the tendency to give much more importance to the "performance" and to the "efficiency" sides to be able to be more "competitive", so this can easily become extremism that also cause problems of more violence inside the society. So technocracy is not correct thinking, because what we need is democracy that needs also a competent governance. But we have to understand better our world, and you have to notice on what is based many of the western democratic countries like France and such, i think that they understand that what we need is also the right dose of "humanism" that permits us to be a |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 11 03:08PM -0700 Hello, More about philosophy of computing.. I said before: ===================================================================== What is smartness in computing or parallel computing ? I think being smart at computing or parallel computing is also what we call smartness , but what is it ? I think you have to analyze my below SemaMonitor and SemaCondvar to notice that it is also smartness, because what i am doing in my below software project is like playing "smartly" at the game of chess to be able to be successful, so if you are noticing in my below software project that i am constructing like a "protocol" that is efficient, this protocol is based on a language constituted of efficient commands, it is also like a sophisticated automaton that is constructed with smartness, and this sophisticated automaton permits an efficient protocol that is based on an efficient language that must be able to allow us to "express" "efficiently"(with smartness) what we want, this is what i am doing in my software project below, and the inner of the sophisticated automaton must be efficient (notice also that i am garbage collecting efficiently inside the wait() method), and notice how i am thinking it smartly, i am like finding the different ways of the game of chess and after that "organizing" and "managing" so that to be successful, and it is what we call smartness. Look at the source code of my following new SemaCondvar and SemaMonitor version 2.2 to notice it: My SemaCondvar and SemaMonitor version 2.2 are here.. Now i think they are working perfectly, and notice that i have changed a little bit there interface. Please read the readme file to know how to use them. You can download them from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/semacondvar-semamonitor And the lightweight version is here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/light-weight-semacondvar-semamonitor ================================================================== If i say to you the following: I need an efficient protocol to express efficiently this or that.. This is a good way to understand more computing, because you are feeling that it needs transcendance and it needs smartness to compose, this is the same for morality, you have to be able to define the rules of morality , but this needs global views and understanding and local views and understanding, this is how is smartness of computing, because when i invented and implemented my SemaMonitor and SemaCondvar, i needed to be capable local understanding and views of how to implement a Semaphore and how to implement an Eventcount and how to implement a condition variable and how to implement windows event objects and make them portable, and i needed also to be capable of a global understanding and view so that to combine them efficiently and combine them also in an efficient protocol, so as you are noticing that smart computing needs trascendance and smartness and efficiency, and speaking about efficiency , i invite you to read my following thoughts of my political philosophy: About white supremacism and neo-nazism.. I am more capable at political philosophy, and i think i understand the "defect" of white supremacism and neo-nazism, it is about "morality", and as i defined morality by two abstractions that are: Perfection at best and with Efficiency and the correct compassion and love that is inherent to efficiency (read more below to understand), so i think the defect of white supremacism and neo-nazism, is that they want to be white supremacism so they have the "tendency" like neo-nazism to be "radicalism" of "perfection" that is "too" violent with humans imperfections (but notice that we can not be confident with there violent behavior towards human imperfections), so they are like ideologies of radicalism that are evil over this earth, because they are not understanding the basis of our today civilization, our today civilization is also more patience and more tolerance and our today civilization is more positive because it believes that science and technology will soon be able to solve many of our problems because of the exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns that are so fast, so our today civilization is more positive and more confident, and read what i wrote before about being civilized: Now what is it to be civilized ? This is a smart question.. You have to understand deeply our kind of civilization to be able to answer this question, i think that our kind of civilization is wanting to "maximize" at best by "effort" the avoidance of savagery even if we are still savagery here and there, you have to be able able to understand how to prioritize to be able to succeed ! i think that our kind of civilization is giving a weight of great importance to the fact of avoiding savagery at best by effort, so this principle doesn't contradict the fact that even if we are still savagery here and there we have to maximize at best the avoidance of savagery by "effort", and also this principle has to be in accordance with the fact that we have to be the right "stability" to be able to call a society a society or a country a country, so this is why we are noticing that we are being a kind of "tolerance" and we are a social system and we are a health care system in our kind of civilization. So to be in accordance with the principle above you are understanding that we have to be efficient and much organized to be able to be this principle in action, this is why i am not in accordance with neo-nazism or white supremacism, because they are inferiority of morality that doesn't understand the requirements of our today "civilization", so white supremacists and neo-nazis have to adapt because they are too much violence. Yet about meritocracy and elitism.. I wrote previously the following: "More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy.. The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy. But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what kind of meritocracy do we have to have ? Because as you are noticing that i said below: "You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism"" And to be more "smart" look "carefully" at my following poem that i wrote previously that talks about the above problem: === Look at the more "individual" perfection It can become an imperfection Since more "awareness" of imperfections that is more individual perfection Can make us hate and discriminate our imperfections And since we are many of us made also of imperfections So this can make "us" more disorganized and less perfection And that's an "important" problem that needs an "attention" So this is why morality is calling for "actions" This is why laws are our security and a right prevention And this weakness must become a beautiful ascension So you have to see it better in many more dimensions ! Since it is like running away from the pain of detention ! So as you see there is no pretension So hope that there is no incomprehension ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. ==== Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand better: More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy.. The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy. But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what kind of meritocracy do we have to have ? Because as you are noticing that i said below: "You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism" So you are noticing more what kind of Elitism and Meritocracy we have to be. So you have to be careful with the kind of Elitism and Meritocracy that we want to have. And you have to know how to navigate efficiently like a "pro", this is why you have to get into "realtime" and "dynamic" calculations to get better at efficiency, being correct professionalism needs from us to take responsability very "seriously", so you have to avoid to be lazy , because it is a work of everyday, look for example at how we are being synchronized much more efficiently etc. so you are noticing that our today lives are synchronized much more efficiently and our today lives needs to be much more "efficient" because today life needs from us to be much more smart and much more efficient than our past history, so as you are noticing that it is like our today is based on much more efficiency than past history and this doesn't contradict my following thoughts of my political philosophy, so read it again: More political philosophy about order.. I think you are understanding me more, but you are feeling more and more that i am also an Elitist, but you have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism, i am a proactive Elitism that talks to the people and that understand the living conditions of people, and that wants people to be "efficiency", and to be able to be efficiency you have to know how to be order, order is also following the rule of: People needs efficiency ! so order has to know how to follow rules of efficiency ! this is what i am talking about in my political philosophy: is how to be efficiency ! this is why you have also seen me talking in my political philosophy about what is morality and what is efficiency and is compassion and love inherent to efficiency (but notice that efficiency here is about humans that are efficient and that governs), so you have to understand me more, this is why you have to read my following thoughts of my political philosophy: About love and order.. As you are noticing i am "playing" with words when i am doing political philosophy, for example i am saying that i have defined morality by two abstractions that are: "Perfection at best" and with Efficiency and compassion and love that are inherent to efficiency. But you will ask the following question: Is it logical to say that compassion and love are inherent to efficiency ? You have to understand political philosophy, when i say love in political philosophy , love must "satisfy" "order", and order is primordial ! but what is order ? In political philosophy, order is a maximization at best of order ! so now you are understanding that there is no logical contradiction in my writing, this is why you are noticing that i am saying below the following: === Is compassion or love inherent to efficiency ? This is a very important question in political philosophy, so how can we answer it? i will start to answer it like this: Notice that in a society that we form (like in a country), we are also trying to "unite" so that to avoid desorder and its violence, so from this kind of "unification" we can say that a decent compassion and a decent love that is considered decent by morality and by the people is inherent to efficiency in politics so that to avoid desorder and its violence ! (read the rest of my thoughts below to understand more) == About democracy and corruption.. Corruption is Inducement to wrong by improper or unlawful means. Read the definition of corruption here to notice it: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corruption So as i am explaining below that democracy depends on and is guided by morality that i defined with two abstraction that are: "Perfection at best" and with Efficiency and compassion and love that are inherent to efficiency (read below to understand), hence we can say that corruption is also "lack" of efficiency that doesn't follow the rule of morality that is: The people needs efficiency. So when i say below that: === How must we think democracy in political philosophy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption, we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best. === Corruption above also means that it is lack of efficiency. Read the rest of my thoughts to understand more: More political philosophy about democracy.. Is democracy the best thing to do ? Here is what i said before, and my today answer is below: ======================================================= How must we think democracy in political philosophy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption, we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best. And now about to technocracy or to not technocracy ? This is a really good subject of political philosophy, and answering it permits us to understand better our actual democracies, this is why i will continu to answer this question: I said before the following: Because you have to notice that technocracy needs utilitarianism and this kind of utilitarianism of technocracy needs "dictatorship", so technocracy is not democracy and technocracy is dictatorship, and this dictatorship can cause problems of more violence inside the society. Also this kind of utilitarianism of technocracy is something problematic because it has the tendency to give much more importance to the "performance" and to the "efficiency" sides to be able to be more "competitive", so this can easily become extremism that also cause problems of more violence inside the society. So technocracy is not correct thinking, because what we need is democracy that needs also a competent governance. But we have to understand better our world, and you have to notice on what is based many of the western democratic countries like France and such, i think that they understand that what we need is also the right dose of "humanism" that permits us to be a "civilization" that avoids savagery, this is why the utilitarianism of technocracy is not correct thinking, and i think we |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 11 01:04PM -0700 Hello, What is smartness in computing or parallel computing ? I think being smart at computing or parallel computing is also what we call smartness , but what is it ? I think you have to analyze my below SemaMonitor and SemaCondvar to notice that it is also smartness, because what i am doing in my below software project is like playing "smartly" at the game of chess to be able to be successful, so if you are noticing in my below software project that i am constructing like a "protocol" that is efficient, this protocol is based on a language constituted of efficient commands, it is also like a sophisticated automaton that is constructed with smartness, and this sophisticated automaton permits an efficient protocol that is based on an efficient language that must be able to allow us to "express" "efficiently"(with smartness) what we want, this is what i am doing in my software project below, and the inner of the sophisticated automaton must be efficient (notice also that i am garbage collecting efficiently inside the wait() method), and notice how i am thinking it smartly, i am like finding the different ways of the game of chess and after that "organizing" and "managing" so that to be successful, and it is what we call smartness. Look at the source code of my following new SemaCondvar and SemaMonitor version 2.2 to notice it: My SemaCondvar and SemaMonitor version 2.2 are here.. Now i think they are working perfectly, and notice that i have changed a little bit there interface. Please read the readme file to know how to use them. You can download them from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/semacondvar-semamonitor And the lightweight version is here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/light-weight-semacondvar-semamonitor Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 11 11:38AM -0700 Hello, My SemaCondvar and SemaMonitor version 2.2 are here.. Now i think they are working perfectly, and notice that i have changed a little bit there interface. Please read the readme file to know how to use them. You can download them from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/semacondvar-semamonitor And the lightweight version is here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/light-weight-semacondvar-semamonitor Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment