| aminer68@gmail.com: Aug 20 11:44AM -0700 Hello, What do i mean by morality is perfection at best ? I said before the following: "Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection So that to be able to solve all our problems And be absolute happiness that is the goal But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system" So as you are noticing that even if morality is a system of values and principles of conduct, we can ask what is the characteristics of this system of values and principles of conduct? and we can notice that the most important thing is not the writing of this system of values and principles of conduct, but it is the characteristic of the writing of this system of values and principles of conduct that is to perfect at best, so i think my definition is logical. So now that you are understanding my definition of morality, please read my following thoughts to understand better: About white supremacism and neo-nazism.. I am more capable at political philosophy, and i think i understand the "defect" of white supremacism and neo-nazism, it is about "morality", and as i defined morality by two abstractions that are: Perfection at best and with Efficiency and the correct compassion and love that is inherent to efficiency (read more below to understand), so i think the defect of white supremacism and neo-nazism, is that they want to be white supremacism so they have the "tendency" like neo-nazism to be "radicalism" of "perfection" that is "too" violent with humans imperfections (but notice that we can not be confident with there violent behavior towards human imperfections), so they are like ideologies of radicalism that are evil over this earth, because they are not understanding the basis of our today civilization, our today civilization is also more patience and more tolerance and our today civilization is more positive because it believes that science and technology will soon be able to solve many of our problems because of the exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns that are so fast, so our today civilization is more positive and more confident, and read what i wrote before about being civilized: Now what is it to be civilized ? This is a smart question.. You have to understand deeply our kind of civilization to be able to answer this question, i think that our kind of civilization is wanting to "maximize" at best by "effort" the avoidance of savagery even if we are still savagery here and there, you have to be able able to understand how to prioritize to be able to succeed ! i think that our kind of civilization is giving a weight of great importance to the fact of avoiding savagery at best by effort, so this principle doesn't contradict the fact that even if we are still savagery here and there we have to maximize at best the avoidance of savagery by "effort", and also this principle has to be in accordance with the fact that we have to be the right "stability" to be able to call a society a society or a country a country, so this is why we are noticing that we are being a kind of "tolerance" and we are a social system and we are a health care system in our kind of civilization. So to be in accordance with the principle above you are understanding that we have to be efficient and much organized to be able to be this principle in action, this is why i am not in accordance with neo-nazism or white supremacism, because they are inferiority of morality that doesn't understand the requirements of our today "civilization", so white supremacists and neo-nazis have to adapt because they are too much violence. Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better: Yet about meritocracy and elitism.. I wrote previously the following: "More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy.. The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy. But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what kind of meritocracy do we have to have ? Because as you are noticing that i said below: "You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism"" And to be more "smart" look "carefully" at my following poem that i wrote previously that talks about the above problem: === Look at the more "individual" perfection It can become an imperfection Since more "awareness" of imperfections that is more individual perfection Can make us hate and discriminate our imperfections And since we are many of us made also of imperfections So this can make "us" more disorganized and less perfection And that's an "important" problem that needs an "attention" So this is why morality is calling for "actions" This is why laws are our security and a right prevention And this weakness must become a beautiful ascension So you have to see it better in many more dimensions ! Since it is like running away from the pain of detention ! So as you see there is no pretension So hope that there is no incomprehension ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. ==== Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand better: More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy.. The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy. But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what kind of meritocracy do we have to have ? Because as you are noticing that i said below: "You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism" So you are noticing more what kind of Elitism and Meritocracy we have to be. So you have to be careful with the kind of Elitism and Meritocracy that we want to have. And you have to know how to navigate efficiently like a "pro", this is why you have to get into "realtime" and "dynamic" calculations to get better at efficiency, being correct professionalism needs from us to take responsability very "seriously", so you have to avoid to be lazy , because it is a work of everyday, look for example at how we are being synchronized much more efficiently etc. so you are noticing that our today lives are synchronized much more efficiently and our today lives needs to be much more "efficient" because today life needs from us to be much more smart and much more efficient than our past history, so as you are noticing that it is like our today is based on much more efficiency than past history and this doesn't contradict my following thoughts of my political philosophy, so read it again: More political philosophy about order.. I think you are understanding me more, but you are feeling more and more that i am also an Elitist, but you have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism, i am a proactive Elitism that talks to the people and that understand the living conditions of people, and that wants people to be "efficiency", and to be able to be efficiency you have to know how to be order, order is also following the rule of: People needs efficiency ! so order has to know how to follow rules of efficiency ! this is what i am talking about in my political philosophy: is how to be efficiency ! this is why you have also seen me talking in my political philosophy about what is morality and what is efficiency and is compassion and love inherent to efficiency (but notice that efficiency here is about humans that are efficient and that governs), so you have to understand me more, this is why you have to read my following thoughts of my political philosophy: About love and order.. As you are noticing i am "playing" with words when i am doing political philosophy, for example i am saying that i have defined morality by two abstractions that are: "Perfection at best" and with Efficiency and compassion and love that are inherent to efficiency. But you will ask the following question: Is it logical to say that compassion and love are inherent to efficiency ? You have to understand political philosophy, when i say love in political philosophy , love must "satisfy" "order", and order is primordial ! but what is order ? In political philosophy, order is a maximization at best of order ! so now you are understanding that there is no logical contradiction in my writing, this is why you are noticing that i am saying below the following: === Is compassion or love inherent to efficiency ? This is a very important question in political philosophy, so how can we answer it? i will start to answer it like this: Notice that in a society that we form (like in a country), we are also trying to "unite" so that to avoid desorder and its violence, so from this kind of "unification" we can say that a decent compassion and a decent love that is considered decent by morality and by the people is inherent to efficiency in politics so that to avoid desorder and its violence ! (read the rest of my thoughts below to understand more) == About democracy and corruption.. Corruption is Inducement to wrong by improper or unlawful means. Read the definition of corruption here to notice it: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corruption So as i am explaining below that democracy depends on and is guided by morality that i defined with two abstraction that are: "Perfection at best" and with Efficiency and compassion and love that are inherent to efficiency (read below to understand), hence we can say that corruption is also "lack" of efficiency that doesn't follow the rule of morality that is: The people needs efficiency. So when i say below that: === How must we think democracy in political philosophy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption, we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best. === Corruption above also means that it is lack of efficiency. Read the rest of my thoughts to understand more: More political philosophy about democracy.. Is democracy the best thing to do ? Here is what i said before, and my today answer is below: ======================================================= How must we think democracy in political philosophy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption, we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best. And now about to technocracy or to not technocracy ? This is a really good subject of political philosophy, and answering it permits us to understand better our actual democracies, this is why i will continu to answer this question: I said before the following: Because you have to notice that technocracy needs utilitarianism and this kind of utilitarianism of technocracy needs "dictatorship", so technocracy is not democracy and technocracy is dictatorship, and this dictatorship can cause problems of more violence inside the society. Also this kind of utilitarianism of technocracy is something problematic because it has the tendency to give much more importance to the "performance" and to the "efficiency" sides to be able to be more "competitive", so this can easily become extremism that also cause problems of more violence inside the society. So technocracy is not correct thinking, because what we need is democracy that needs also a competent governance. But we have to understand better our world, and you have to notice on what is based many of the western democratic countries like France and such, i think that they understand that what we need is also the right dose of "humanism" that permits us to be a "civilization" that avoids savagery, this is why the utilitarianism of technocracy is not correct thinking, and i think we can also "view" this right dose of humanism as the way that USA system is run by the separation of powers to not "fall" into extremism and savagery ! so as you are noticing that democracy needs a competent governance and i think that democracy and a competent governance is the way to go. ======================================================================= So is democracy the best thing to do ? I think you have to understand that democracy "depends" on morality, it is like guided also by morality, and since as i said in my political philosophy below that morality is efficiency and the right compassion and love, so democracy also needs those requirements and is guided by those requirements, so democracy of course needs a "competent" governance since people needs efficiency, and democracy fights more efficiently corruption, and democracy needs to know how to avoid extremism that causes problems inside the system etc. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand better: About morality and political philosophy.. As you will notice i will do more political philosophy so that you understand better: If you remember my last thoughts of political philosophy about morality, it is the following: =========================================================================== I said in my proof before of: morality is perfection at best, the following: "Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection So that to be able to solve all our problems And be absolute happiness that is the goal But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system" I have to be more precise: When i say: And we have to avoid the |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment