- More political philosophy about beauty.. - 1 Update
- More political philosophy about politics.. - 1 Update
- Why Mistakes Matter in Creating A Path For Learning - 1 Update
| Wisdom91 <d1@d1.d1>: Jun 22 10:33PM -0400 Hello, Read this: More political philosophy about beauty.. I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart, and today i will talk about: Does beauty exist ? and i will start it by saying the following: When you are smart you will notice that you can think beauty systemically or think beauty individually, also by logical analogy you will notice that beauty can depend on the layer of abstraction, so it can be when you look at a thing from the outside , it looks beautiful and when you look at it from the inside or from the details it looks not beautiful, i give you an example: I said that Democracy has two protecting walls, first protecting wall is that it is better at fighting corruption(and corruption is also lack of efficiency in governing, read below to notice it), and Democracy has a second protecting wall that it must not be "extremism" that harms Democracy. So as you are noticing that the second protecting wall is the "tendency" that doesn't get into the details, so do we have to be pessimistic and say that Democracy is not beautiful ? i don't think so, because to understand more about beauty we have by analogy to compare it with my following writing about Morality: ------------------------------------------------------------------- As you have noticed i have just said (read below) the following: "First you have to know how to take care of your "image" , and taking care of your image is also an engine that pushes you forward towards more perfection, but there is also my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" that is also an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, since also i said that this satisfaction is double satisfaction as i explained it to you by saying: "When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit."" But you have to be "smart" to understand my example above, the double satisfaction is also the intellectual or cultural satisfaction and the material satisfaction, because knowing how to cook a Moroccan couscous is intellectual or cultural and eating a Moroccan couscous is material. ----------------------------------------------------------------- So as you are noticing that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes also with the not beautiful of the effort that we have to be so that to be satisfaction, this is by logical analogy the same for Democracy, the second protecting wall of the Democracy also is the satisfaction of not being extremism that harms Democracy, but when you get into the details it can be somewhat not beautiful, but we have to know how to be tolerance and patience about it(read below my writing about Donald Trump to notice it), so now you are understanding my kind of philosophy about it, it looks like my following thoughts: --------------------------------------------------------------------- And more political philosophy about money to understand more: When you look at the beautiful, like a beautiful moon in the night, you will notice that it is like a satisfaction of looking at the beautiful, but at the same time the moon is also a wild place and dangerous place, so by logical analogy, if you only work for money , it it is like thinking at the other side of the moon that is dangerous for us and that is a wild place and logically inferring that the world is not beautiful and that this or that thing can look beautiful but our world is not beautiful and that this spirit makes you like hating our world, but saying so and being so is like working only for money and it is a "corruption" of the mind, so you have to change your "perception" and "conception" and to think differently by adhering to my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", it means that more perfection brings a satisfaction of being more perfection, and this Rule is an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, and this is also an efficient spirit and it is also my spirit. Read more on my thoughts here about Morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- So to answer the question above of: Does beauty exist ? we can say that it is by analogy as to what i am saying below about competition and collaboration, that we have to seek a balance between collaboration and competition, it is analogically the same as beauty, since i think that life is a balance between the beautiful and the not beautiful, and can we say that life is not beautiful ? i don't think so, because we are getting "satisfactions" from it that prove that life is not that is not beautiful. And about the universality of beauty , read my following thoughts: Is beauty universal ? I will make you understand with smartness what about the following webpage: Look at the following webpage from BBC: The myth of universal beauty https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150622-the-myth-of-universal-beauty So notice in the above webpage that it is saying the following about beauty: "Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive" So you have to understand that the above webpage from BBC is not smart, i will make you understand with smartness that beauty is universal, so if we take the following sentence of the above webpage: "Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive" So you have to put it in the context of the above webpage, and understand that the way of thinking of the webpage from BBC is not smart, because it is saying that since in the above sentence starvation is a risk , so heavier weight can be more attractive, but this can be heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes, so it makes a conclusion that universal beauty is not universal, but this is not smart because we have not to measure beautifulness with only our eyes and say that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is not beautiful, because we have to measure it with smartness and say that smartness says that in the above sentence that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is beautiful for smartness because starvation is a risk, so then with smartness we can say that beauty is universal. So we have to know that that the system of reference of measure is very important, by logical analogy we can say that measuring beautifulness with the eyes is like measuring individual smartness with only genetics, but measuring beautifulness with both the eyes and smartness is like measuring individual smartness with both the genetical and the cultural. More political philosophy about proactivity of morality.. I said below the following: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- More political philosophy about politics.. I am a white arab, and i think i am like a genius since i have invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, so i will invite you to look carefully at my following thoughts of my political philosophy about Morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So if you are like a genius like me, you will notice that my philosophy above about Morality shows the "tendency" of the essence of Morality or Morality that is also seeking a "balance", and it doesn't get into the details, it is by logical analogy the same as what i am saying below about competition and collaboration, since i said that the best way is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, and it is by logical analogy the same as Democracy, since Morality of Democracy doesn't get into the details , but Democracy shows the "tendency" that it must not be "extremism" that harms Democracy and Morality of Democracy is "not" completely purifying from evil. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- So as you are noticing i am saying the following: "Morality of Democracy is "not" completely purifying from evil" And if you are smart You will notice that i am not saying it in relative but "absolute"(I mean: the same in all situations), and it is truth in absolute. Other than that you will notice that Democracy has two protecting walls, first wall is that it is better at fighting corruption(and corruption is also lack of efficiency in governing, read below to notice it), and Democracy has a second protecting wall that it must not be "extremism" that harms Democracy. But here again you are noticing that we have to be proactive in Democracy to avoid corruption of the minds of people, and i have for example said the following about it: --------------------------------------------------------------------- And more political philosophy about money to understand more: When you look at the beautiful, like a beautiful moon in the night, you will notice that it is like a satisfaction of looking at the beautiful, but at the same time the moon is also a wild place and dangerous place, so by logical analogy, if you only work for money , it it is like thinking at the other side of the moon that is dangerous for us and that is a wild place and logically inferring that the world is not beautiful and that this or that thing can look beautiful but our world is not beautiful and that this spirit makes you like hating our world, but saying so and being so is like working only for money and it is a "corruption" of the mind, so you have to change your "perception" and "conception" and to think differently by adhering to my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", it means that more perfection brings a satisfaction of being more perfection, and this Rule is an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, and this is also an efficient spirit and it is also my spirit. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Also you have to be proactive in Democracy by correctly educating people and by being Mass media that are responsable and that correctly educate people. And read my previous thoughts to understand more: More political philosophy about politics.. I am a white arab, and i think i am like a genius since i have invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, so i will invite you to look carefully at my following thoughts of my political philosophy about Morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So if you are like a genius like me, you will notice that my philosophy above about Morality shows the "tendency" of the essence of Morality or Morality that is also seeking a "balance", and it doesn't get into the details, it is by logical analogy the same as what i am saying below about competition and collaboration, since i said that the best way is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, and it is by logical analogy the same as Democracy, since Morality of Democracy doesn't get into the details , but Democracy shows the "tendency" that it must not be "extremism" that harms Democracy and Morality of Democracy is "not" completely purifying from evil. Read my following thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more: About more political philosophy about Democracy and the West.. I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart, and i will talk today about a very important thing, and i think it is what we call "purifying" from evil, i think that the problem of the West is that it is not understanding that Democracy is not completely "purifying" from evil, but Democracy doesn't accept "extremism" that harms it, this is the weakness of the West, people of the West are not understanding Democracy of the West, and here is what i said about Democracy: ------------------------------------------------------------------- More political philosophy about Democracy.. You have to understand more deeply Democracy, since Donald Trump is not here to please "all" americans, but we have to know about the essence of Democracy, because Democracy is here because of constraints, since there is a characteristics in morality that is a first protecting wall and there is a characteristic in Democracy that is a second protecting wall(read below to notice it), but you have to understand the essence of morality and the essence of Democracy, because Democracy doesn't mean that it is people that choose, because it is not in accordance with the essence of morality that must be the King(read below to notice it), since Democracy has been choosen because it is a system that is better at avoiding corruption than dictatorship(and corruption is also lack of efficiency of governance) and Democracy is a system that tries to give a choice and a voice that is a right , but our "duty" in Democracy is that we have not to be "extremism" that harms Democracy. So this is why i think that Donald Trump is not extremism of neo-nazism or white supremacism that harms Democracy, so we have to be patience and tolerance that is in accordance with Democracy and Morality. ------------------------------------------------------------------- So as you are noticing i am clearly making you understand by my thoughts above that Democracy is not completely purifying from evil and Democracy must not accept extremism that harms Democracy, and now you are understanding that idiologies such as Islamism or neo-nazism or white supremacism want like to completely purify from evil and they are extremism so they do harm Democracy. More precision about political philosophy about Democracy.. You have to know about abstract reasoning, so when i am saying below that Democracy is like morality that is a diversity, so you have to understand that it is abstract reasoning, because the essence of morality is perfectioning towards absolute perfection, and democracy is also an acts of perfectioning, so a logical analogy can be made, this is why it is what we call abstract reasoning, so I think i am a white arab that is more smart, and i will explain more Democracy, you have to know that Democracy needs to advance with more and more perfection towards absolute perfection so that to solve all our problems, so then Democracy needs responsability from the people, and Democracy needs meritocracy , so then it needs capitalism, and read my following logical reasoning to notice it, please read it carefully and think about it deeply: From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ? So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy, you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money. Now why to be Democracy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that Democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Jun 22 01:52PM -0700 Hello, More political philosophy about politics.. I am a white arab, and i think i am like a genius since i have invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, so i will invite you to look carefully at my following thoughts of my political philosophy about Morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So if you are like a genius like me, you will notice that my philosophy above about Morality shows the "tendency" of the essence of Morality or Morality that is also seeking a "balance", and it doesn't get into the details, it is by logical analogy the same as what i am saying below about competition and collaboration, since i said that the best way is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, and it is by logical analogy the same as Democracy, since Morality of Democracy doesn't get into the details , but Democracy shows the "tendency" that it must not be "extremism" that harms Democracy and Morality of Democracy is "not" completely purifying from evil. Read my following thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more: About more political philosophy about Democracy and the West.. I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart, and i will talk today about a very important thing, and i think it is what we call "purifying" from evil, i think that the problem of the West is that it is not understanding that Democracy is not completely "purifying" from evil, but Democracy doesn't accept "extremism" that harms it, this is the weakness of the West, people of the West are not understanding Democracy of the West, and here is what i said about Democracy: ------------------------------------------------------------------- More political philosophy about Democracy.. You have to understand more deeply Democracy, since Donald Trump is not here to please "all" americans, but we have to know about the essence of Democracy, because Democracy is here because of constraints, since there is a characteristics in morality that is a first protecting wall and there is a characteristic in Democracy that is a second protecting wall(read below to notice it), but you have to understand the essence of morality and the essence of Democracy, because Democracy doesn't mean that it is people that choose, because it is not in accordance with the essence of morality that must be the King(read below to notice it), since Democracy has been choosen because it is a system that is better at avoiding corruption than dictatorship(and corruption is also lack of efficiency of governance) and Democracy is a system that tries to give a choice and a voice that is a right , but our "duty" in Democracy is that we have not to be "extremism" that harms Democracy. So this is why i think that Donald Trump is not extremism of neo-nazism or white supremacism that harms Democracy, so we have to be patience and tolerance that is in accordance with Democracy and Morality. ------------------------------------------------------------------- So as you are noticing i am clearly making you understand by my thoughts above that Democracy is not completely purifying from evil and Democracy must not accept extremism that harms Democracy, and now you are understanding that idiologies such as Islamism or neo-nazism or white supremacism want like to completely purify from evil and they are extremism so they do harm Democracy. More precision about political philosophy about Democracy.. You have to know about abstract reasoning, so when i am saying below that Democracy is like morality that is a diversity, so you have to understand that it is abstract reasoning, because the essence of morality is perfectioning towards absolute perfection, and democracy is also an acts of perfectioning, so a logical analogy can be made, this is why it is what we call abstract reasoning, so I think i am a white arab that is more smart, and i will explain more Democracy, you have to know that Democracy needs to advance with more and more perfection towards absolute perfection so that to solve all our problems, so then Democracy needs responsability from the people, and Democracy needs meritocracy , so then it needs capitalism, and read my following logical reasoning to notice it, please read it carefully and think about it deeply: From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ? So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy, you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money. Now why to be Democracy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that Democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption (and corruption also means lack of efficiency), we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best. More political philosophy about morality.. I think i am more smart, and i think that "confidence" is part of the game of being a society or humanity, so we have to know how to bring confidence so that the society and humanity be able to work correctly, and so that to bring confidence we have to know how to be the right tolerance and the right patience, and since also we are not all beautiful, read the following to notice it: Not everyone is beautiful https://theconversation.com/not-everyone-is-beautiful-35915 So confidence must take into account this fact and be the right tolerance and patience that bring confidence in the system. And read my following thoughts of my political philosophy about Morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 Why Mistakes Matter in Creating A Path For Learning Read more here: https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/48770/how-making-mistakes-primes-kids-to-learn-better More political philosophy about competition or collaboration.. I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart, and today i will talk about do we have to be collaboration or competition ? so as you are noticing that nationalism and individualism are too much competition and communism and socialism are too much collaboration, so we have to be more smart since i think that the best ideology is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration and since this way of doing also permits us to avoid to be a violent society by still being good for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration, so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition. More political philosophy about Communism.. There is one big problem with communism, and of communism of China, you can know about it by contrasting a too centralized and not too centralized and by logically inferring the advantages and disadvantages, the main problem of communism is a problem of diversity, and what is it to be the right diversity? and now you are understanding that to be more efficient and since i am thinking and writing rapidly and this is the constraint, i have to proceed like by proving by logical contradiction, so how can i make you feel the main problem of Communism of China or Communism? so by like a proof by logical contradiction i will ask the following: can you learn what is darkness by just looking and analyzing the lightness ? so now you are immediately noticing that we are also learning from the darkness and we are also learning from lightness ! so i think this diversity is necessary ! because it is right that we have to know how to prevent mistakes, but we are also learning by making mistakes ! and i say that both the way of prevention and the way of making mistakes are very important ! so this is the main problem of dictatorship of Communism, it is too centralized and it is lacking on diversity and it is thus lacking on both the way of learning by making mistakes and the way of prevention, and i say that in Democracy people has to be prepared to learn by making mistakes and by being prevention ! i will give you an example so that you understand rapidly, read the following about this big problem or weakness of being too centralized of dictatorship of Communism: About agility and flexibility.. We have to be more smart, so i will invite you to look at the following video about the Israel army: Why is the ISRAELI ARMY so POWERFUL? - VisualPolitik EN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdgg0uDhrOs&t=450s You will notice that the english person that is talking in the video is not "technical" about the methodology and is not speaking about the "inside" of the methodology, and the methodology of the Israel army is agility and flexibility that comes from the following, read my following posting to understand about it: Managing complex programs – standardize and decentralize for efficiency and agility Read more here: http://www.reddal.com/insights/managing-complex-programs-standardize-and-decentralize-for-agile-control/ And notice that the web link above is related to the following agile methodology: What is agile methodology? Modern software development explained Read more here on InfoWorld: https://www.infoworld.com/article/3237508/what-is-agile-methodology-modern-software-development-explained.html More political philosophy about civilization.. I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart and i am an inventor of many scalable algorithms, but today i will speak about a very important thing and it is how to build a civilization, because i think that we have to be smart and notice that so that to build a civilization there is a very important requirement and it is that it must be an effort of building a civilization, so we have not to be like a coward that neglect to be this effort of building a civilization, so the effort of building a civilization is so important, so we have to be responsability, and also we have to know by how we have to be guided to this effort of building a civilization, so we have to be guided by the good taste that also permits to be efficiently selective to be able to be a greater quality or perfection and we have to be not violence that permits to be less individualistic and that permits to be more order and that permits to be more organized. And read the following about the good taste: Why we should stand up for good taste https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20140605-what-makes-good-taste Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Jun 22 11:21AM -0700 Hello, Why Mistakes Matter in Creating A Path For Learning Read more here: https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/48770/how-making-mistakes-primes-kids-to-learn-better More political philosophy about competition or collaboration.. I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart, and today i will talk about do we have to be collaboration or competition ? so as you are noticing that nationalism and individualism are too much competition and communism and socialism are too much collaboration, so we have to be more smart since i think that the best ideology is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration and since this way of doing also permits us to avoid to be a violent society by still being good for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration, so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition. More political philosophy about Communism.. There is one big problem with communism, and of communism of China, you can know about it by contrasting a too centralized and not too centralized and by logically inferring the advantages and disadvantages, the main problem of communism is a problem of diversity, and what is it to be the right diversity? and now you are understanding that to be more efficient and since i am thinking and writing rapidly and this is the constraint, i have to proceed like by proving by logical contradiction, so how can i make you feel the main problem of Communism of China or Communism? so by like a proof by logical contradiction i will ask the following: can you learn what is darkness by just looking and analyzing the lightness ? so now you are immediately noticing that we are also learning from the darkness and we are also learning from lightness ! so i think this diversity is necessary ! because it is right that we have to know how to prevent mistakes, but we are also learning by making mistakes ! and i say that both the way of prevention and the way of making mistakes are very important ! so this is the main problem of dictatorship of Communism, it is too centralized and it is lacking on diversity and it is thus lacking on both the way of learning by making mistakes and the way of prevention, and i say that in Democracy people has to be prepared to learn by making mistakes and by being prevention ! i will give you an example so that you understand rapidly, read the following about this big problem or weakness of being too centralized of dictatorship of Communism: About agility and flexibility.. We have to be more smart, so i will invite you to look at the following video about the Israel army: Why is the ISRAELI ARMY so POWERFUL? - VisualPolitik EN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdgg0uDhrOs&t=450s You will notice that the english person that is talking in the video is not "technical" about the methodology and is not speaking about the "inside" of the methodology, and the methodology of the Israel army is agility and flexibility that comes from the following, read my following posting to understand about it: Managing complex programs – standardize and decentralize for efficiency and agility Read more here: http://www.reddal.com/insights/managing-complex-programs-standardize-and-decentralize-for-agile-control/ And notice that the web link above is related to the following agile methodology: What is agile methodology? Modern software development explained Read more here on InfoWorld: https://www.infoworld.com/article/3237508/what-is-agile-methodology-modern-software-development-explained.html More political philosophy about Democracy.. You have to understand more deeply Democracy, since Donald Trump is not here to please "all" americans, but we have to know about the essence of Democracy, because Democracy is here because of constraints, since there is a characteristics in morality that is a first protecting wall and there is a characteristic in Democracy that is a second protecting wall(read below to notice it), but you have to understand the essence of morality and the essence of Democracy, because Democracy doesn't mean that it is people that choose, because it is not in accordance with the essence of morality that must be the King(read below to notice it), since Democracy has been choosen because it is a system that is better at avoiding corruption than dictatorship(and corruption is also lack of efficiency of governance) and Democracy is a system that tries to give a choice and a voice that is a right , but our "duty" in Democracy is that we have not to be "extremism" that harms Democracy. So this is why i think that Donald Trump is not extremism of neo-nazism or white supremacism that harms Democracy, so we have to be patience and tolerance that is in accordance with Democracy and Morality. More precision about political philosophy about Democracy.. You have to know about abstract reasoning, so when i am saying below that Democracy is like morality that is a diversity, so you have to understand that it is abstract reasoning, because the essence of morality is perfectioning towards absolute perfection, and democracy is also an acts of perfectioning, so a logical analogy can be made, this is why it is what we call abstract reasoning, so I think i am a white arab that is more smart, and i will explain more Democracy, you have to know that Democracy needs to advance with more and more perfection towards absolute perfection so that to solve all our problems, so then Democracy needs responsability from the people, and Democracy needs meritocracy , so then it needs capitalism, and read my following logical reasoning to notice it, please read it carefully and think about it deeply: From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ? So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy, you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money. Now why to be Democracy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that Democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption (and corruption also means lack of efficiency), we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best. More political philosophy about morality.. I think i am more smart, and i think that "confidence" is part of the game of being a society or humanity, so we have to know how to bring confidence so that the society and humanity be able to work correctly, and so that to bring confidence we have to know how to be the right tolerance and the right patience, and since also we are not all beautiful, read the following to notice it: Not everyone is beautiful https://theconversation.com/not-everyone-is-beautiful-35915 So confidence must take into account this fact and be the right tolerance and patience that bring confidence in the system. More precision about exponential progress and exponential growth and more, read again: Here is the 6 D's of Exponential Growth: Digitalization: Once something goes from physical to digital, it gains the ability to grow exponentially. Deception: Initial exponential growth is such small increases (.01 to .02) that it goes largely unnoticed. Disruption: Either a new market is created, or an old one is overturned. You either disrupt yourself, or you are disrupted. Demonetization: The major assets in the industry will become free. Free music, free reading, free communication. Dematerialization: Removal of the original product entirely, lumping alarm clocks, cameras, notebooks, and phones into one smartphone. Democratization: The costs drop so low that the technology becomes available to everyone. Read more here: The 6 Ds of Tech Disruption: A Guide to the Digital Economy https://singularityhub.com/2016/11/22/the-6-ds-of-tech-disruption-a-guide-to-the-digital-economy/?fbclid=IwAR1Jx4VJYvIce-BJXeVcajBYjwdKvvP_2y4WOd-2DEtGvXnOye0yzkQVdQU&utm_content=bufferb9891&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook-hub&utm_campaign=buffer Also capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth Read more here: http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth And read the following: Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ But as you have just noticed that it is also related to my following thoughts: The future of innovation is in software I keep reading about how the future will be shaped by new cheaper fuel or amazing new medications. I believe that we are misreading the trends. Yes, we will have better medications and cheaper fuel in the future. However, I believe we are clearly in the mist of an information revolution. The future will be shaped by software, defined broadly. Specifically, I believe that: Tele-work, tele-play, tele-learning will soon represent 80% of our lives. There is much more room for innovation in software than in hardware. There are few ways to build a house, but many more ways to build a virtual house. Read more here: https://lemire.me/blog/2008/10/27/the-future-of-innovation-is-in-software/ And this related to my following thoughts: Dematerialising the future: what role can technology and consumers play? I have just posted before about Dematerialization Through Services, read it here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.usa/rVZUcghUe5E The above makes it clear that the evidence indicates that 'dematerialization through services' is not a valid policy for reducing carbon emissions. But Dematerialising is still important, read the following to notice it: Dematerialising the future: what role can technology and consumers play? https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/dematerialising-future-technology-consumers Also read my following thoughts to notice: About capitalism and the positive correlation between economic growth and environmental performance.. As an economy expands, resource usage becomes increasingly efficient and economies tend to move away from ecologically harmful behavior, while raising the standard of living of its participants. In fact, the 2018 Yale Environmental Performance Index shows a clear positive correlation between economic growth and environmental performance, read about it here: https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/2018/report/category/hlt So i think that we are on the right path, so as you are noticing that we have to dematerialize much more so that to avoid Environmental problems, but how will look like our near future that will be much more dematerialized ? look here in the following video to notice that one of our fellow techlead and software developer is doing it by much more dematerializing his life and he is happy by doing it: My minimalist apartment (as a millionaire) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUeqHhbQWFc More political philosophy about civilization.. I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart and i am an inventor of many scalable algorithms, but today i will speak about a very important thing and it is how to build a civilization, because i think that we have to be smart and notice that so that to build a civilization there is a very important requirement and it is that it must be an effort of building a civilization, so we have not to be like a coward that neglect to be this effort of building a civilization, so the effort of building a civilization is so important, so we have to be responsability, and also we have to know by how we have to be guided to this effort of building a civilization, so we have to be guided by the good taste that also permits to be efficiently selective to be able to be a greater quality or perfection and we have to be not violence that permits to be less individualistic and that permits to be more order and that permits to be more organized. And read the following about the good taste: Why we should stand up for good taste https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20140605-what-makes-good-taste So as you will notice by reading my following thoughts, that i am also a good taste and i am also this effort of building a civilization by also being R&D((Research and development), since as you will read below that i have invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations.. About my methodology and my pedagogy.. I have just written the following: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- More political philosophy about Pedagogy.. I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart, but today i will explain my kind of methodology of learning: i am learning by implementing efficiently layer by layer, the first layer is how to be efficiently "selective" of your knowledge, second layer is how to learn by maximizing at best quality or perfection of learning by minimizing at best quantity of learning, after that second layer you will be able to become much more powerful and be able to go fast and efficiently at learning. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Look at how i am in accordance with the second layer, i said that the second layer is the following: "second layer is how to learn by maximizing at best quality or perfection of learning by minimizing at best quantity of learning" So look carefully below at how i have invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, and this also shows that i am doing R&D(Research and development), but it shows also that i am maximizing quality by minimizing at best quantity. So read carefully all my following thoughts to notice it: I am a white arab, and now about Lockfree and Waitfree and Locks.. I have just read the following thoughts of a PhD researcher, and he says the following: "Lock-based concurrency mechanism (locks) have several difficulties in practice: 1) if we use more than one lock, we're subject to having deadlock issues; 2) if we use priority locks, we're subject to having priority inversion |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment