- Yet more precision - 1 Update
- Will a robot take my job? - 1 Update
- About my Open source software projects and about some of my inventions.. - 1 Update
- Free Pascal 3.2 the new major version of the Pascal compiler is finally available! - 1 Update
- More precision - 1 Update
- More political philosophy about beauty.. - 1 Update
| aminer68@gmail.com: Jun 23 01:12PM -0700 Hello, On 6/23/2020 3:03 PM, Hibou wrote: > may be understood to be 'satisfaction with life as a whole.'" > Once again that's a different (and valid) construction, one equating two > nouns. To simplify, <noun> is <noun>, happiness is satisfaction. You are not smart, and i am a smart guy and i will say the following: When you say as above: "to be satisfaction with life" So you notice that saying: "to be satisfaction" is like saying "to be in a state of satisfaction", because it is inherent to "to be satisfaction" that logically we can be in many different states than only being satisfaction. So then this logically opens the door and we can finally say that saying: "Being satisfaction" means "being in a state of satisfaction". Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Jun 23 10:50AM -0700 Hello, Look at this video: Will a robot take my job? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2aocKWrPG8 Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Jun 23 09:41AM -0700 Hello, About my Open source software projects and about some of my inventions.. As you have just noticed, i have just posted about the new Free Pascal 3.2 (read below), so i have just tested my invention of a Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references and it is working perfectly with the new Free Pascal 3.2, and Free Pascal does support modern Object Pascal of Delphi, here is my invention: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references And i think all my Delphi and Freepascal Open source software projects are compatible with the new Free Pascal 3.2 and with Delphi tokyo. You can download some of my inventions and my Open source software projects from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/ Free Pascal 3.2 the new major version of the Pascal compiler is finally available! Read more here: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fpascal.developpez.com%2Factu%2F306543%2FFree-Pascal-3-2-la-nouvelle-version-majeure-du-compilateur-Pascal-est-enfin-disponible%2F Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Jun 23 09:14AM -0700 Hello.. Free Pascal 3.2 the new major version of the Pascal compiler is finally available! Read more here: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fpascal.developpez.com%2Factu%2F306543%2FFree-Pascal-3-2-la-nouvelle-version-majeure-du-compilateur-Pascal-est-enfin-disponible%2F Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Jun 23 07:09AM -0700 On 6/23/2020 2:20 AM, Hibou wrote: > and I'm not even going to try to translate it into English. > Your English is execrable. While it remains so, you will have trouble > convincing anyone of anything. Also notice that i am saying: "By being satisfaction of being this more perfection.." I think i am correct by saying it, since read the following: https://thecreative.cafe/the-satisfaction-of-being-eternally-unsatisfied-3abf1c12cc0c Notice that it is saying: "The satisfaction of being eternally Unsatisfied" And please look at the following: https://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/index.php/ijow/article/view/762 So as you are noticing it is saying: "to be satisfaction with life" So i think i am correct by saying: "Be satisfaction" Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| aminer68@gmail.com: Jun 23 07:08AM -0700 Hello.. More political philosophy about beauty.. I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart, and today i will talk about: Does beauty exist ? and i will start it by saying the following: When you are smart you will notice that you can think beauty systemically or think beauty individually, also by logical analogy you will notice that beauty can depend on the layer of abstraction, so it can be when you look at a thing from the outside , it looks beautiful and when you look at it from the inside or from the details it looks not beautiful, i give you an example: I said that Democracy has two protecting walls, first protecting wall is that it is better at fighting corruption(and corruption is also lack of efficiency in governing, read below to notice it), and Democracy has a second protecting wall that it must not be "extremism" that harms Democracy. So as you are noticing that the second protecting wall is the "tendency" that doesn't get into the details, so do we have to be pessimistic and say that Democracy is not beautiful ? i don't think so, because to understand more about beauty we have by analogy to compare it with my following writing about Morality: ------------------------------------------------------------------- As you have noticed i have just said (read below) the following: "First you have to know how to take care of your "image" , and taking care of your image is also an engine that pushes you forward towards more perfection, but there is also my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" that is also an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, since also i said that this satisfaction is double satisfaction as i explained it to you by saying: "When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit."" But you have to be "smart" to understand my example above, the double satisfaction is also the intellectual or cultural satisfaction and the material satisfaction, because knowing how to cook a Moroccan couscous is intellectual or cultural and eating a Moroccan couscous is material. ----------------------------------------------------------------- So as you are noticing that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes also with the not beautiful of the effort that we have to be so that to be satisfaction, this is by logical analogy the same for Democracy, the second protecting wall of the Democracy also is the satisfaction of not being extremism that harms Democracy, but when you get into the details it can be somewhat not beautiful, but we have to know how to be tolerance and patience about it(read below my writing about Donald Trump to notice it), so now you are understanding my kind of philosophy about it, it looks like my following thoughts: --------------------------------------------------------------------- And more political philosophy about money to understand more: When you look at the beautiful, like a beautiful moon in the night, you will notice that it is like a satisfaction of looking at the beautiful, but at the same time the moon is also a wild place and dangerous place, so by logical analogy, if you only work for money , it it is like thinking at the other side of the moon that is dangerous for us and that is a wild place and logically inferring that the world is not beautiful and that this or that thing can look beautiful but our world is not beautiful and that this spirit makes you like hating our world, but saying so and being so is like working only for money and it is a "corruption" of the mind, so you have to change your "perception" and "conception" and to think differently by adhering to my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", it means that more perfection brings a satisfaction of being more perfection, and this Rule is an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, and this is also an efficient spirit and it is also my spirit. Read more on my thoughts here about Morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- So to answer the question above of: Does beauty exist ? we can say that it is by analogy as to what i am saying below about competition and collaboration, that we have to seek a balance between collaboration and competition, it is analogically the same as beauty, since i think that life is a balance between the beautiful and the not beautiful, and can we say that life is not beautiful ? i don't think so, because we are getting "satisfactions" from it that prove that life is not that is not beautiful. And about the universality of beauty , read my following thoughts: Is beauty universal ? I will make you understand with smartness what about the following webpage: Look at the following webpage from BBC: The myth of universal beauty https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150622-the-myth-of-universal-beauty So notice in the above webpage that it is saying the following about beauty: "Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive" So you have to understand that the above webpage from BBC is not smart, i will make you understand with smartness that beauty is universal, so if we take the following sentence of the above webpage: "Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive" So you have to put it in the context of the above webpage, and understand that the way of thinking of the webpage from BBC is not smart, because it is saying that since in the above sentence starvation is a risk , so heavier weight can be more attractive, but this can be heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes, so it makes a conclusion that universal beauty is not universal, but this is not smart because we have not to measure beautifulness with only our eyes and say that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is not beautiful, because we have to measure it with smartness and say that smartness says that in the above sentence that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is beautiful for smartness because starvation is a risk, so then with smartness we can say that beauty is universal. So we have to know that that the system of reference of measure is very important, by logical analogy we can say that measuring beautifulness with the eyes is like measuring individual smartness with only genetics, but measuring beautifulness with both the eyes and smartness is like measuring individual smartness with both the genetical and the cultural. More political philosophy about proactivity of morality.. I said below the following: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- More political philosophy about politics.. I am a white arab, and i think i am like a genius since i have invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, so i will invite you to look carefully at my following thoughts of my political philosophy about Morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So if you are like a genius like me, you will notice that my philosophy above about Morality shows the "tendency" of the essence of Morality or Morality that is also seeking a "balance", and it doesn't get into the details, it is by logical analogy the same as what i am saying below about competition and collaboration, since i said that the best way is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, and it is by logical analogy the same as Democracy, since Morality of Democracy doesn't get into the details , but Democracy shows the "tendency" that it must not be "extremism" that harms Democracy and Morality of Democracy is "not" completely purifying from evil. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- So as you are noticing i am saying the following: "Morality of Democracy is "not" completely purifying from evil" And if you are smart You will notice that i am not saying it in relative but "absolute"(I mean: the same in all situations), and it is truth in absolute. Other than that you will notice that Democracy has two protecting walls, first wall is that it is better at fighting corruption(and corruption is also lack of efficiency in governing, read below to notice it), and Democracy has a second protecting wall that it must not be "extremism" that harms Democracy. But here again you are noticing that we have to be proactive in Democracy to avoid corruption of the minds of people, and i have for example said the following about it: --------------------------------------------------------------------- And more political philosophy about money to understand more: When you look at the beautiful, like a beautiful moon in the night, you will notice that it is like a satisfaction of looking at the beautiful, but at the same time the moon is also a wild place and dangerous place, so by logical analogy, if you only work for money , it it is like thinking at the other side of the moon that is dangerous for us and that is a wild place and logically inferring that the world is not beautiful and that this or that thing can look beautiful but our world is not beautiful and that this spirit makes you like hating our world, but saying so and being so is like working only for money and it is a "corruption" of the mind, so you have to change your "perception" and "conception" and to think differently by adhering to my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", it means that more perfection brings a satisfaction of being more perfection, and this Rule is an engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, and this is also an efficient spirit and it is also my spirit. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Also you have to be proactive in Democracy by correctly educating people and by being Mass media that are responsable and that correctly educate people. And read my previous thoughts to understand more: More political philosophy about politics.. I am a white arab, and i think i am like a genius since i have invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, so i will invite you to look carefully at my following thoughts of my political philosophy about Morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So if you are like a genius like me, you will notice that my philosophy above about Morality shows the "tendency" of the essence of Morality or Morality that is also seeking a "balance", and it doesn't get into the details, it is by logical analogy the same as what i am saying below about competition and collaboration, since i said that the best way is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, and it is by logical analogy the same as Democracy, since Morality of Democracy doesn't get into the details , but Democracy shows the "tendency" that it must not be "extremism" that harms Democracy and Morality of Democracy is "not" completely purifying from evil. Read my following thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more: About more political philosophy about Democracy and the West.. I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart, and i will talk today about a very important thing, and i think it is what we call "purifying" from evil, i think that the problem of the West is that it is not understanding that Democracy is not completely "purifying" from evil, but Democracy doesn't accept "extremism" that harms it, this is the weakness of the West, people of the West are not understanding Democracy of the West, and here is what i said about Democracy: ------------------------------------------------------------------- More political philosophy about Democracy.. You have to understand more deeply Democracy, since Donald Trump is not here to please "all" americans, but we have to know about the essence of Democracy, because Democracy is here because of constraints, since there is a characteristics in morality that is a first protecting wall and there is a characteristic in Democracy that is a second protecting wall(read below to notice it), but you have to understand the essence of morality and the essence of Democracy, because Democracy doesn't mean that it is people that choose, because it is not in accordance with the essence of morality that must be the King(read below to notice it), since Democracy has been choosen because it is a system that is better at avoiding corruption than dictatorship(and corruption is also lack of efficiency of governance) and Democracy is a system that tries to give a choice and a voice that is a right , but our "duty" in Democracy is that we have not to be "extremism" that harms Democracy. So this is why i think that Donald Trump is not extremism of neo-nazism or white supremacism that harms Democracy, so we have to be patience and tolerance that is in accordance with Democracy and Morality. ------------------------------------------------------------------- So as you are noticing i am clearly making you understand by my thoughts above that Democracy is not completely purifying from evil and Democracy must not accept extremism that harms Democracy, and now you are understanding that idiologies such as Islamism or neo-nazism or white supremacism want like to completely purify from evil and they are extremism so they do harm Democracy. More precision about political philosophy about Democracy.. You have to know about abstract reasoning, so when i am saying below that Democracy is like morality that is a diversity, so you have to understand that it is abstract reasoning, because the essence of morality is perfectioning towards absolute perfection, and democracy is also an acts of perfectioning, so a logical analogy can be made, this is why it is what we call abstract reasoning, so I think i am a white arab that is more smart, and i will explain more Democracy, you have to know that Democracy needs to advance with more and more perfection towards absolute perfection so that to solve all our problems, so then Democracy needs responsability from the people, and Democracy needs meritocracy , so then it needs capitalism, and read my following logical reasoning to notice it, please read it carefully and think about it deeply: From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ? So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy, you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money. Now why to be Democracy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that Democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption (and corruption also means lack of |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment