Sunday, September 20, 2020

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 5 updates in 5 topics

Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 19 12:04PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
More political philosophy about mathematics and quality..
 
You have just seen me previously posting about mathematics, I think that mathematics also brings quality..
 
So i invite you to read my following thoughts to notice it:
 
Yet more political philosophy about quality control and quality..
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms..
 
So first you have to define quality(read below about it) and second
you have to construct quality and third you have to control quality.
 
So, I have just read the following about the Central Limit Theorem
(I understood it), i invite you to read it carefully:
 
https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter7/7_1_2_central_limit_theorem.php
 
 
So as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is so important
for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)):
 
An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC)
 
https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx
 
Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration.
 
So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal
 
More political philosophy of what is quality..
 
I have just read the following article about what is quality,
i invite you to read it:
 
https://www.cmc-global.org/content/why-quality-so-important-organization
 
And notice that it says:
 
"What is "Quality"?
 
We can define the term "quality" in many ways, but the ISO family of standards gives a very concise definition: "quality - the degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfils requirements." (ISO 9000:2005 – 3.1.1)."
 
 
So i think that this definition is also in accordance with my previous thoughts of my political philosophy, since notice that the requirements
in the definition are both requirements by the people that use quality and requirements by the individual or group who bring quality, and notice that the requirements of the individual or group who bring quality have to adhere to the following, read my following thoughts to understand:
 
More political philosophy about civilization..
 
So first you are noticing that we have to be Meritocracy, but Meritocracy has to define what is the right "value", is the right value only a useful utility ? so now you are understanding that if we define it by simply saying that it is a useful utility to people, so now we are not respecting the principles of Morality, since we have to make our civilization go forward towards more and more perfection, so this going forward towards more and more perfection sets the usefulness of the utility , so then it sets the value, so then you are noticing that Morality is like going forward towards more and more perfection and this process enhance the "quality" and the quality of the utility, so then it sets the value and it sets the usefulness of the utility, and i think this is part of the essence of a civilization.
 
So read my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality here to notice it:
 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4
 
 
More political philosophy about efficiency..
 
Today i will speak about the most important subject and
it is: How to be efficient ?
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, so i will answer this question as follows:
 
You have to be both good productivity and good quality.
 
Now my answer is a high level abstraction, so i will go into the
lower layers of abstraction:
 
So, to be efficient productivity, here is what you have to
do: Read my following smart thoughts to understand:
 
https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity
 
 
So as you are noticing i am saying:
 
"Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input
 
But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger than the Serial productivity part, so productivity can scale much more (and it is like Gustafson's Law)."
 
 
So as you are noticing that my answer about productivity is smart.
 
And now how to be good in quality?
 
You have to be smart(and use you fluid intelligence efficiently) and
efficiently learn how to learn and efficiently learn.
 
So as you are noticing that the constant factors in the human population are genetical, so the very important thing to notice is that to be good in quality you have to have a good education and an awareness, and of course you have, like in genetic algorithms, to know how to efficiently optimize locally(by exploitation) and globally(by exploration and diversification) so that to be optimal optimization. And of course there is individual efficiency and the group efficiency, but you have to be
smart and notice that you have to know about the exponential progress and how to exponentially progress, so read my following thoughts to
understand about it:
 
Here is the 6 D's of Exponential Growth:
 
Digitalization: Once something goes from physical to digital, it gains
the ability to grow exponentially.
 
Deception: Initial exponential growth is such small increases (.01 to
.02) that it goes largely unnoticed.
 
Disruption: Either a new market is created, or an old one is overturned.
You either disrupt yourself, or you are disrupted.
 
Demonetization: The major assets in the industry will become free. Free
music, free reading, free communication.
 
Dematerialization: Removal of the original product entirely, lumping
alarm clocks, cameras, notebooks, and phones into one smartphone.
 
Democratization: The costs drop so low that the technology becomes
available to everyone.
 
Read more here:
 
The 6 Ds of Tech Disruption: A Guide to the Digital Economy
 
https://singularityhub.com/2016/11/22/the-6-ds-of-tech-disruption-a-guide-to-the-digital-economy/?fbclid=IwAR1Jx4VJYvIce-BJXeVcajBYjwdKvvP_2y4WOd-2DEtGvXnOye0yzkQVdQU&utm_content=bufferb9891&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook-hub&utm_campaign=buffer
 
Also capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth
 
Read more here:
 
http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth
 
And read the following:
 
Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ
 
 
But as you have just noticed that it is also related to my following
thoughts:
 
The future of innovation is in software
 
I keep reading about how the future will be shaped by new cheaper fuel
or amazing new medications. I believe that we are misreading the trends.
Yes, we will have better medications and cheaper fuel in the future.
However, I believe we are clearly in the mist of an information
revolution. The future will be shaped by software, defined broadly.
 
Specifically, I believe that:
 
Tele-work, tele-play, tele-learning will soon represent 80% of our lives.
 
There is much more room for innovation in software than in hardware.
 
There are few ways to build a house, but many more ways to build a
virtual house.
 
Read more here:
 
https://lemire.me/blog/2008/10/27/the-future-of-innovation-is-in-software/
 
And this related to my following thoughts:
 
Dematerialising the future: what role can technology and consumers play?
 
I have just posted before about Dematerialization Through Services,
read it here:
 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.usa/rVZUcghUe5E
 
The above makes it clear that the evidence indicates that
'dematerialization through services' is not a valid policy for
reducing carbon emissions.
 
But Dematerialising is still important, read the following to notice it:
 
Dematerialising the future: what role can technology and consumers play?
 
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/dematerialising-future-technology-consumers
 
Also read my following thoughts to notice:
 
About capitalism and the positive correlation between economic growth
and environmental performance..
 
As an economy expands, resource usage becomes increasingly efficient and
economies tend to move away from ecologically harmful behavior, while
raising the standard of living of its participants. In fact, the 2018
Yale Environmental Performance Index shows a clear positive correlation
between economic growth and environmental performance, read about it here:
 
https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/2018/report/category/hlt
 
So i think that we are on the right path, so as you are noticing that we
have to dematerialize much more so that to avoid Environmental problems,
but how will look like our near future that will be much more
dematerialized ? look here in the following video to notice that one of
our fellow techlead and software developer is doing it by much more
dematerializing his life and he is happy by doing it:
 
My minimalist apartment (as a millionaire)
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUeqHhbQWFc
 
 
More political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui..
 
I am a white arab from Morocco that is living in Canada since year 1989 and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and now i will do more political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, here it is:
 
https://tasteofmaroc.com/moroccan-couscous-with-seven-vegetables/
 
So as you are noticing you have to be smart, so when you look at this
beautiful Moroccan couscous, there is different levels of abstraction,
since you can simply look at it and remember and say that it is a beautiful Moroccan couscous, or you can be more smart and look at
it from a different perspective and from a different level of abstraction and say that this beautiful Moroccan couscous requires Spices that give it the good taste, and when you are smart you will immediately make a logical analogy with political philosophy by saying that those Spices of this beautiful Moroccan couscous make, from the imperfection of a not so good taste, a perfection of a good taste, so you will say that it is the same for humans, since arabs and indians and south americans and such other ethnical groups can also use Spices in a form of good education and awareness so that to reduce by much there
imperfections that give them a not so good taste , so that to be accepted by others, and now you are understanding that it is a good philosophy that calls for proactivity that wants people to have a good education and an awareness, and this is related to my following thoughts on hate, so read them carefully:
 
You have to understand political philosophy, i think political philosophy must be "constructive", but what do i mean by constructive ? you will quickly notice that humans have human imperfections, but when you look at those human imperfection you can start to hate humans and hate our humanity, but this is not the good political philosophy, because you have to distinguish between two things: First, you can look at those human imperfections and hate humans and hate our humanity and then degenerate towards a much more violent system, second, you can look at those human imperfections and say that we have to transcend those human imperfections by being efficiently educated and by being efficiently organized globally and locally and by being efficiently trained and by being efficiently aware and conscious, so what will you choose ? so i think you are quickly understanding that Democracy has to be "proactive" by efficiently educating and by efficiently organizing globally and locally and by efficiently training and by efficiently making aware and conscious so that Democracy works correctly and so that we can transcend our human imperfections, so then i think that you are quickly noticing that it is the way that i am choosing so that to transcend our human imperfections, this is why you
have noticed that i said previously the following:
 
---
I am noticing that people here are quick at hating, notice
that the white supremacist of soc.culture.china newsgroup
called Byker is hating Chinese people and is hating other people
around the world etc. and notice that people are quick at hating people because of there human imperfections, but i think that this is not wise because you can easily hate people and hate our world and hate our humanity, but when you are smart you will notice that you have not to fall into this trap of hating and hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity, because the best way is to be "constructive" and make people educated and aware and efficient so that we reduce much more there imperfections and so that we accept them and so that we don't fall into the trap of hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity. This is why i am talking as i am talking political philosophy.
---
 
 
More political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, here it is:
 
https://tasteofmaroc.com/moroccan-couscous-with-seven-vegetables/
 
 
First i said the following about fluid intelligence:
 
---
 
Here is my definition of "pattern", since i am using it below in
my thoughts of my political philosophy:
 
A pattern is a discernible coherent system based on the intended interrelationship of component parts.
 
So you are understanding that fluid intelligence from genetics
has to discern this coherent system and also extract the rule,
it is also how we are extracting a theorem in mathematics,
it is how works fluid intelligence from genetics.
 
---
 
 
So as you are noticing i am using my fluid intelligence so that
to make you understand my way of thinking, so notice from my
definition above of what is a pattern, that fluid intelligence
that is capable of discerning a more difficult pattern or coherent system is what we call smartness, so notice how in my above thoughts i have with my fluid intelligence descerned an important pattern or an
important coherent system in the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, also i have with my fluid intelligence discerned another important pattern or coherent system in Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, and here it is:
 
When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and
eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being
this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan
couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes
with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to
prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient
philosophy. And it is also my spirit.
 
But you have to be "smart" to understand my example above, the double
satisfaction is also the intellectual or cultural satisfaction
and the material satisfaction, because knowing how to cook
a Moroccan couscous is intellectual or cultural and eating a
Moroccan couscous is material, and it is also a philosophy that shows that satisfaction is good, but the cultural and/or the material satisfaction needs the necessary effort by being responsability, and
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 19 11:15AM -0700

Hello,
 
 
Look at this interesting video:
 
Why is Math Hard? - A Meta-Mathematics Perspective | Stephen Wolfram and Lex Fridman
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UziQG0CG2o
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 19 11:15AM -0700

Hello,
 
 
Look at this interesting video:
 
Stephen Wolfram - Is Mathematics Invented or Discovered
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUCwtLTUPQ4
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 19 06:42AM -0700

Hello,
 
 
Read again, i correct a typo about: Eric Schmidt, former boss of Google: the United States has "lost control" on innovation,
 
China has supplanted the US as the world's leading publisher of science and engineering research
 
 
"Indeed in 2008, the United States published 394,979 articles on science and education in journals, ahead of China which published 249,049. Due to its rapid growth rate, China published 528,263 articles in 2019, more than the United States, which published 422,808, reported the GEF. This is significant, because it shows how much China is focused on research and development compared to the United States.
 
The former Google boss attributes the narrowing of the innovation gap between the United States and China to the lack of funding in the United States. "The United States has been the undisputed leader in R&D throughout my life," said Dr Schmid. "The funding was the equivalent of about 2% of the country's GDP. Recently, R&D has fallen to a lower percentage than it was before Sputnik, "he added.
 
Dr Schmidt also said that the technological supremacy of the United States was also built with international talents who were allowed to work and study in the United States. He is now warning that the United States risks falling further behind if this type of talent is not allowed to enter the country.
 
"This highly skilled immigration is crucial for US competitiveness, global competitiveness, the creation of these new businesses, etc. He said. "America does not have enough people with these skills."
 
 
Read more here:
 
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.developpez.com%2Factu%2F308797%2FEric-Schmidt-ex-patron-de-Google-les-Etats-Unis-ont-perdu-la-main-sur-l-innovation-la-Chine-a-supplante-les-USA-en-tant-que-premier-editeur-mondial-de-recherche-en-sciences-et-en-ingenierie%2F
 
 
This is related to my following writing:
 
About USA and the brain's power..
 
I have just looked at the following video, look at it carefully:
 
India Is Becoming Its Own Silicon Valley
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHVNWtBuDVk
 
Look in the above video at how the smartest people of high-tech
in India are talking about USA, since they are saying that they
don't want to come to USA because of Donald Trump(and this is
related to my writing below), and i think what they are saying is that Donald Trump and his followers are racism towards other groups that are not of there white European group, so i think USA has made a big mistake by electing Donald Trump, and i think that Germany and other European
countries have not to make the same mistake as USA, because read my
my following writing to understand why:
 
More political philosophy about immigration..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart, since i am an inventor
of many scalable algorithms and there implementations, and today
i will speak about an important subject that is immigration..
 
Let's look for example at USA, so read the following from Jonathan Wai that is a Ph.D., it says:
 
"Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson uncovered that the "smart fraction" of a country is quite influential in impacting the performance of that country, for example, its GDP."
 
And it also says the following:
 
""According to recent population estimates, there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains." But consider that the U.S. benefits from the smart fractions of every other country in the world because it continues to serve as a magnet for brainpower, something that is not even factored into these rankings.
 
What these rankings clearly show is America is likely still in the lead in terms of brainpower. And this is despite the fact federal funding for educating our smart fraction is currently zero. Everyone seems worried Americans are falling behind, but this is because everyone is focusing on average and below average people. Maybe it's time we started taking a closer look at the smartest people of our own country."
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201312/whats-the-smartest-country-in-the-world
 
So as you are noticing it's immigrants(and there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains) that are making USA a rich country.
 
 
And read also the following to understand more:
 
Why Silicon Valley Wouldn't Work Without Immigrants
 
There are many theories for why immigrants find so much success in tech. Many American-born tech workers point out that there is no shortage of American-born employees to fill the roles at many tech companies. Researchers have found that more than enough students graduate from American colleges to fill available tech jobs. Critics of the industry's friendliness toward immigrants say it comes down to money — that technology companies take advantage of visa programs, like the H-1B system, to get foreign workers at lower prices than they would pay American-born ones.
 
But if that criticism rings true in some parts of the tech industry, it misses the picture among Silicon Valley's top companies. One common misperception of Silicon Valley is that it operates like a factory; in that view, tech companies can hire just about anyone from anywhere in the world to fill a particular role.
 
But today's most ambitious tech companies are not like factories. They're more like athletic teams. They're looking for the LeBrons and Bradys — the best people in the world to come up with some brand-new, never-before-seen widget, to completely reimagine what widgets should do in the first place.
 
"It's not about adding tens or hundreds of thousands of people into manufacturing plants," said Aaron Levie, the co-founder and chief executive of the cloud-storage company Box. "It's about the couple ideas that are going to be invented that are going to change everything."
 
Why do tech honchos believe that immigrants are better at coming up with those inventions? It's partly a numbers thing. As the tech venture capitalist Paul Graham has pointed out, the United States has only 5 percent of the world's population; it stands to reason that most of the world's best new ideas will be thought up by people who weren't born here.
 
If you look at some of the most consequential ideas in tech, you find an unusual number that were developed by immigrants. For instance, Google's entire advertising business — that is, the basis for the vast majority of its revenues and profits, the engine that allows it to hire thousands of people in the United States — was created by three immigrants: Salar Kamangar and Omid Kordestani, who came to the United States from Iran, and Eric Veach, from Canada.
 
But it's not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to new ideas.
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/personaltech/why-silicon-valley-wouldnt-work-without-immigrants.html
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 19 06:38AM -0700

Hello,
 
 
Eric Schmidt, former boss of Google: the United States has "lost control" on innovation,
 
China has supplanted the US as the world's leading publisher of science and engineering research
 
 
"Indeed in 2008, the United States published 394,979 articles on science and education in journals, ahead of China which published 249,049. Due to its rapid growth rate, China published 528,263 articles in 2019, more than the United States, which published 422,808, reported the GEF. This is significant, because it shows how much China is focused on research and development compared to the United States.
 
The former Google boss attributes the narrowing of the innovation gap between the United States and China to the lack of funding in the United States. "The United States has been the undisputed leader in R&D throughout my life," said Dr Schmid. "The funding was the equivalent of about 2% of the country's GDP. Recently, R&D has fallen to a lower percentage than it was before Sputnik, "he added.
 
Dr Schmidt also said that the technological supremacy of the United States was also built with international talents who were allowed to work and study in the United States. He is now warning that the United States risks falling further behind if this type of talent is not allowed to enter the country.
 
"This highly skilled immigration is crucial for US competitiveness, global competitiveness, the creation of these new businesses, etc. He said. "America does not have enough people with these skills."
 
 
Read mere here:
 
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.developpez.com%2Factu%2F308797%2FEric-Schmidt-ex-patron-de-Google-les-Etats-Unis-ont-perdu-la-main-sur-l-innovation-la-Chine-a-supplante-les-USA-en-tant-que-premier-editeur-mondial-de-recherche-en-sciences-et-en-ingenierie%2F
 
 
This is related to my following writing:
 
About USA and the brain's power..
 
I have just looked at the following video, look at it carefully:
 
India Is Becoming Its Own Silicon Valley
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHVNWtBuDVk
 
Look in the above video at how the smartest people of high-tech
in India are talking about USA, since they are saying that they
don't want to come to USA because of Donald Trump(and this is
related to my writing below), and i think what they are saying is that Donald Trump and his followers are racism towards other groups that are not of there white European group, so i think USA has made a big mistake by electing Donald Trump, and i think that Germany and other European
countries have not to make the same mistake as USA, because read my
my following writing to understand why:
 
More political philosophy about immigration..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart, since i am an inventor
of many scalable algorithms and there implementations, and today
i will speak about an important subject that is immigration..
 
Let's look for example at USA, so read the following from Jonathan Wai that is a Ph.D., it says:
 
"Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson uncovered that the "smart fraction" of a country is quite influential in impacting the performance of that country, for example, its GDP."
 
And it also says the following:
 
""According to recent population estimates, there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains." But consider that the U.S. benefits from the smart fractions of every other country in the world because it continues to serve as a magnet for brainpower, something that is not even factored into these rankings.
 
What these rankings clearly show is America is likely still in the lead in terms of brainpower. And this is despite the fact federal funding for educating our smart fraction is currently zero. Everyone seems worried Americans are falling behind, but this is because everyone is focusing on average and below average people. Maybe it's time we started taking a closer look at the smartest people of our own country."
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201312/whats-the-smartest-country-in-the-world
 
So as you are noticing it's immigrants(and there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains) that are making USA a rich country.
 
 
And read also the following to understand more:
 
Why Silicon Valley Wouldn't Work Without Immigrants
 
There are many theories for why immigrants find so much success in tech. Many American-born tech workers point out that there is no shortage of American-born employees to fill the roles at many tech companies. Researchers have found that more than enough students graduate from American colleges to fill available tech jobs. Critics of the industry's friendliness toward immigrants say it comes down to money — that technology companies take advantage of visa programs, like the H-1B system, to get foreign workers at lower prices than they would pay American-born ones.
 
But if that criticism rings true in some parts of the tech industry, it misses the picture among Silicon Valley's top companies. One common misperception of Silicon Valley is that it operates like a factory; in that view, tech companies can hire just about anyone from anywhere in the world to fill a particular role.
 
But today's most ambitious tech companies are not like factories. They're more like athletic teams. They're looking for the LeBrons and Bradys — the best people in the world to come up with some brand-new, never-before-seen widget, to completely reimagine what widgets should do in the first place.
 
"It's not about adding tens or hundreds of thousands of people into manufacturing plants," said Aaron Levie, the co-founder and chief executive of the cloud-storage company Box. "It's about the couple ideas that are going to be invented that are going to change everything."
 
Why do tech honchos believe that immigrants are better at coming up with those inventions? It's partly a numbers thing. As the tech venture capitalist Paul Graham has pointed out, the United States has only 5 percent of the world's population; it stands to reason that most of the world's best new ideas will be thought up by people who weren't born here.
 
If you look at some of the most consequential ideas in tech, you find an unusual number that were developed by immigrants. For instance, Google's entire advertising business — that is, the basis for the vast majority of its revenues and profits, the engine that allows it to hire thousands of people in the United States — was created by three immigrants: Salar Kamangar and Omid Kordestani, who came to the United States from Iran, and Eric Veach, from Canada.
 
But it's not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to new ideas.
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/personaltech/why-silicon-valley-wouldnt-work-without-immigrants.html
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)