- Read again, i correct some last typos about More precision about more political philosophy about smartness and more.. - 1 Update
- More precision about more political philosophy about smartness and more.. - 1 Update
- More political philosophy about smartness and more.. - 1 Update
- More political philosophy about social mobility.. - 1 Update
- More political philosophy about communism of China and communism.. - 1 Update
- More political philosophy about more interesting subjects.. - 1 Update
- Yet more political philosophy about decentralization.. - 1 Update
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 05:19PM -0700 Hello.. Read again, i correct some last typos about More precision about more political philosophy about smartness and more.. I have just said the following: "So i think we can say that the capacity of being genetically a good human artist is artificial intelligence and it is then smartness, since i view it as a mechanism or as a system that is artificial intelligence, but we have not to be pessimistic about the social mobility, since it depends on other factors than artifical or biologic human Smartness" I will give more precision: i mean that we have to isolate the part of the brain of being genetically a good human artist, so this part in the brain that comes from genetics of being a good human artist is not smartness that we know of the human brain, so by isolating the part like that we can define it as a mechanism or as a system that is artificial intelligence and we then can say that it is also smartness. Read my following previous thoughts to understand: More political philosophy about smartness and more.. Please read below how i am defining being genetically a good human artist.. What do you think is smartness ? If i say: 2 + 2 = 4 So are you capable of seeing smartness ? So if you are smart you will not only look at the equality of: 2 + 2 = 4, but you will also look at the constraints by saying that with 2 + 2 = 4 you are not learning much and by saying that we have to verify if learning is constrained by the envirenment(like too much limited or so), so now you are understanding what is smartness, and now you are seeing that saying that smartness is genetical and cultural is not the right abstraction, because the envirenment can also constrain too much that we can say that we are not smart. Yet more political philosophy about smartness.. I think i am smart, so i will talk more about smartness, smartness permits to learn, so we can abstract and say that smartness is like learning, so we can measure smartness by looking at "quality" of learning, so then if the learning is constrained by the envirenment it can can hurt the quality of learning and we can say that we are not smart, but there is still something about smartness, it is that smartness can be artificial or biologic, for example when you look at how the Sun causes lightning on earth, we can then learn from this system of Sun that is causing lightening on earth, and this learning from this system is artificial intelligence and it is smartness , so we can say that our universe also contains such systems that contains smartness of artificial intelligence and we can also say that we can also construct artificial intelligence. So i think we can say that the capacity of being genetically a good human artist is artificial intelligence and it is then smartness, since i view it as a mechanism or as a system that is artificial intelligence, but we have not to be pessimistic about the social mobility, since it depends on other factors than artificial or biologic human Smartness, and here is what i have just said about it: More political philosophy about social mobility.. I have just read the following article: https://www.redpepper.org.uk/social-mobility-is-capitalisms-cover-story/ So as you are noticing it says: "The prominent sociologist Michael Young claimed that fixed social strata were the regrettable consequence of a meritocratic society, as those who had secured higher positions through merit would use their advantage to ensure their offspring were able to secure similarly superior positions for themselves." But he is too pessimistic, since i think that we have to take into account the "context", i think with the current sophistication of internet and the abundance of knowledge on internet, i think this also enhance much more creativity and productivity, and also because of digitalization and by doing business on internet and on the social medias like Facebook and youtube etc. you can "quickly" exponentially grow your number customers and this will enhance much more social mobility, since as i said about Digitalization: Digitalization: Once something goes from physical to digital, it gains the ability to grow exponentially. So we have not to be pessimistic. And this is related to my following thoughts, read them carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU Also capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth Read more here: http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth More political philosophy about communism of China and communism.. You have to understand that communism of China of today is much more "modern", i think that it lets many become very rich, but it taxes the rich much more and that benefits its socialism, and it demands a greater "loyalty" of the Rich to the communist party of China, and i think that communism China is much more capable because China is a much more bigger and powerful country. Read the following article to notice it: China's Communist Party demands private sector's loyalty as external risks rise https://www.journalpioneer.com/business/reuters/chinas-communist-party-demands-private-sectors-loyalty-as-external-risks-rise-497631/ And read the following article to notice it: More taxes for China's super rich will narrow income gap https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1136002.shtml This is why i just said (read below) that communism of China is "useful", i mean it is useful for China and it allows us to see why it is useful and that's useful too ! More political philosophy about more interesting subjects.. I have just looked at the following video, i invite you to look at it: Jordan Peterson | Full interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ruwVc0t2c0 I think that this Jordan Peterson is not smart by talking as he is talking about Marxism and Feminism, I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i will say that Jordan Peterson is talking about Marxism not correctly, because he is neglecting the "context" of Marxism, since we can say that Marxism is not "generally" a correct ideology, but Marxism can become "useful" in the context of Today world, so i will say that the Today communism of China is "useful", since here is what i have just said about it: --- But if you are not smart you will say that communism of China is evil, but this is not correct because you have to understand the essence of communism.. Here is how to explain it: There is competition and there is collaboration and solidarity, but competition has a problem, it is that it can monopolize too much, it is like the problem of monopoly that hurts competition and that hurts quality, so notice that today those that are smart or/and have more money are quickly making too much money with the help of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress, so this is a big problem for communism of China, so this is why communism of China of today is not confident with the private sector that is for them having this big problem, and this is why communism of China is not being confident with the West, so this why communism China of today is not wanting to become Democracy. So you can read my following thoughts about the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities to understand more(and i am giving a solution to it, so read it carefully): https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/wlJu5j1xhPk I think that there is a bug in the world system, and it is that we want in capitalism to be competition and competitiveness , this is why so that capitalist countries do attract investment and smart people they have accepted the fact that people make too much money quickly(and you have to understand the context of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress), so as you are noticing that this is making communism of China not wanting to become Democracy, or it is making socialism of other countries such as Algeria etc. not wanting to become capitalism. So the West has to solve the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities so that to make Marxism much less relevant. ---- Also notice in the above video that Jordan Peterson is talking about Feminism and saying that he agree with Feminism on equality of opportunities, but he doesn't agree with being equity, but i think he is not thinking correctly since he is too vague, since read for example what i am saying about Meritocracy: Read the following article about Meritocracy from the Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/12/meritocracy/418074/ So as you notice it says: "The pursuit of meritocracy is more difficult than it appears," So i think in Meritocracy we can not be strict equality, so we have to get into the details and into the calculations to tune it correctly and efficiently so that to make Meritocracy efficient and at the same time less problematic, but we have to notice that Meritocracy is still important. Yet more political philosophy about decentralization.. We can say the following: The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles. But i ask a smart question of: Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ? Here is my answer: But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU But notice in my above link that i am saying that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration, and i think that it is this new more efficient model of seeking like a balance between competition and collaboration that is the "cause" of bringing decentralization that brings efficiency, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration. And since i am talking in my following thoughts about the socialist state of Algeria, here is my thoughts about socialism: More political philosophy about socialism.. I think that socialism today as a system is a result of an inferior act of human nature that has the tendency to being too much dictatorship or too much fascism, socialism is like measuring individual smartness with only smartness that comes from genetics neglecting smartness that comes from culture, it is like neglecting to reason about some important variables in the system in the context of this Globalization, it is also too much idealism that neglects to see the weaknesses of socialism in the reality and in practice, you will notice that even socialism in Democracy is a bad thing, but socialism of a dictatorship is even worse , since like in optimization in mathematics, since socialism has the tendency to make the government too big and inefficient, because it is simply socialism, so how to be safe from this act of socialism ? and since socialism has the tendency to make taxes too much high, so this is not competitive in the context of this Globalization that needs efficiency of competitiveness, and in dictatorship of Socialism we are not safe from corruption of the government, and corruption in morality can be lack of efficiency , so how can we "escape" this corruption in a dictatorship? so you are noticing with me that dictatorship is a big problem(read about it below on my writing to understand better),also since socialism is solidarity so it also has the tendency to help too much the national companies that are deficient and this not good and this even engender too much debt and this is not good in the context of this Globalization that needs competitiveness, and let us take a look at my writing about socialism in Democracy, it is not even in dictatorship, here is how it looks like: Now I will talk about some deficiencies of socialism like high taxation.. I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on economic growth, productivity and innovation. Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party, I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France. He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes. As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp, the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is indeed egalitarianism. But i have to be more technical about lowering the taxation, here is what i will also technically say: It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the multiplier tax effect: indeed, it results in an increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and employment. Here is the video of Francois Hollande where he said that he doesn't like the rich: "Je n'aime pas les riches" F-Hollande https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui17eyLcJfk Read my following previous thoughts to understand: Read the following: From Centralized to Decentralized Governance https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/1999/12/dillinge.htm And read my following previous thoughts: More political philosophy about how Algeria Liberalized Its Socialist System.. I have just read the following interesting article about Algeria: Algeria Liberalizes Its Socialist System https://www.nytimes.com/1982/05/07/business/algeria-liberalizes-its-socialist-system.html You will quickly notice in the above article the deficiencies of a centralized way of managing or governing, this is why in the above article Algeria has decentralized for much better efficiency, and notice that today Algeria is still a socialist country, but its socialism is much more "pragmatic"(that understand the way of decentralization for better efficiency etc.), and notice in the following article about a new law in today Algeria: Necessary implementation of a strategy and a law governing digital startups https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fedition.legal-doctrine.com%2Fprojet-de-loi-start-up-algerie%2F So as you are noticing that you have to understand it using logical abstraction, i mean that with this new law Algeria wants to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, i mean you can easily notice it by the fact that socialist state of Algeria wants to have a certain level of control so that to avoid Risks, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, read more my following thoughts to notice: And read my following thoughts: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU More political philosophy about efficiency.. Look at the following video from Russia: Putin: If Russia Has No Technological Breakthrough Soon, We Will Fall Far Behind! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OEUTGaxZlI I think we have not to be pessimistic, since as you notice that |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 05:09PM -0700 Hello.. More precision about more political philosophy about smartness and more.. I have just said the following: "So i think we can say that the capacity of being genetically a good human artist is artificial intelligence and it is then smartness, since i view it as a mechanism or as a system that is artificial intelligence, but we have not to be pessimistic about the social mobility, since it depends on other factors than artifical or biologic human Smartness" I will give more precision: i mean that we have to isolate the part of the brain of being genetically a good human artist, so this part in the brain that comes from genetics of being a good human artist is not smartness that we know of the human brain, so by isolating the part like that we can define it as a mechanism or as a system that is artificial intelligence and we then can say that it is also smartness. Read my following previous thoughts to understand: More political philosophy about smartness and more.. Please read below how i am defining being genetically a good human artist.. What do you think is smartness ? If i say: 2 + 2 = 4 So are you capable of seeing smartness ? So if you are smart you will not only look at the equality of: 2 + 2 = 4, but you will also look at the constrains by saying that with 2 + 2 = 4 you are not learning much and by saying that we have to verify if learning is constrained by the envirenment(like too much limited or so), so now you are understanding what is smartness, and now you are seeing that saying that smartness is genetical and cultural is not the right abstraction, because the envirenment can also constrain too much that we can say that we are not smart. Yet more political philosophy about smartness.. I think i am smart, so i will talk more about smartness, smartness permits to learn, so we can abstract and say that smartness is like learning, so we can measure smartness by looking at "quality" of learning, so then if the learning is constrained by the envirenment it can can hurt the quality of learning and we can say that we are not smart, but there is still something about smartness, it is that smartness can be artificial or biologic, for example when you look at how the Sun causes lightning on earth, we can then learn from this system of Sun that is causing lightening on earth, and this learning from this system is artificial intelligence and it is smartness , so we can say that our universe also contains such systems that contains smartness of artificial intelligence and we can also say that we can also construct artificial intelligence. So i think we can say that the capacity of being genetically a good human artist is artificial intelligence and it is then smartness, since i view it as a mechanism or as a system that is artificial intelligence, but we have not to be pessimistic about the social mobility, since it depends on other factors than artifical or biologic human Smartness, and here is what i have just said about it: More political philosophy about social mobility.. I have just read the following article: https://www.redpepper.org.uk/social-mobility-is-capitalisms-cover-story/ So as you are noticing it says: "The prominent sociologist Michael Young claimed that fixed social strata were the regrettable consequence of a meritocratic society, as those who had secured higher positions through merit would use their advantage to ensure their offspring were able to secure similarly superior positions for themselves." But he is too pessimistic, since i think that we have to take into account the "context", i think with the current sophistication of internet and the abundance of knowledge on internet, i think this also enhance much more creativity and productivity, and also because of digitalization and by doing business on internet and on the social medias like Facebook and youtube etc. you can "quickly" exponentially grow your number customers and this will enhance much more social mobility, since as i said about Digitalization: Digitalization: Once something goes from physical to digital, it gains the ability to grow exponentially. So we have not to be pessimistic. And this is related to my following thoughts, read them carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU Also capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth Read more here: http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth More political philosophy about communism of China and communism.. You have to understand that communism of China of today is much more "modern", i think that it lets many become very rich, but it taxes the rich much more and that benefits its socialism, and it demands a greater "loyalty" of the Rich to the communist party of China, and i think that communism China is much more capable because China is a much more bigger and powerful country. Read the following article to notice it: China's Communist Party demands private sector's loyalty as external risks rise https://www.journalpioneer.com/business/reuters/chinas-communist-party-demands-private-sectors-loyalty-as-external-risks-rise-497631/ And read the following article to notice it: More taxes for China's super rich will narrow income gap https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1136002.shtml This is why i just said (read below) that communism of China is "useful", i mean it is useful for China and it allows us to see why it is useful and that's useful too ! More political philosophy about more interesting subjects.. I have just looked at the following video, i invite you to look at it: Jordan Peterson | Full interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ruwVc0t2c0 I think that this Jordan Peterson is not smart by talking as he is talking about Marxism and Feminism, I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i will say that Jordan Peterson is talking about Marxism not correctly, because he is neglecting the "context" of Marxism, since we can say that Marxism is not "generally" a correct ideology, but Marxism can become "useful" in the context of Today world, so i will say that the Today communism of China is "useful", since here is what i have just said about it: --- But if you are not smart you will say that communism of China is evil, but this is not correct because you have to understand the essence of communism.. Here is how to explain it: There is competition and there is collaboration and solidarity, but competition has a problem, it is that it can monopolize too much, it is like the problem of monopoly that hurts competition and that hurts quality, so notice that today those that are smart or/and have more money are quickly making too much money with the help of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress, so this is a big problem for communism of China, so this is why communism of China of today is not confident with the private sector that is for them having this big problem, and this is why communism of China is not being confident with the West, so this why communism China of today is not wanting to become Democracy. So you can read my following thoughts about the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities to understand more(and i am giving a solution to it, so read it carefully): https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/wlJu5j1xhPk I think that there is a bug in the world system, and it is that we want in capitalism to be competition and competitiveness , this is why so that capitalist countries do attract investment and smart people they have accepted the fact that people make too much money quickly(and you have to understand the context of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress), so as you are noticing that this is making communism of China not wanting to become Democracy, or it is making socialism of other countries such as Algeria etc. not wanting to become capitalism. So the West has to solve the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities so that to make Marxism much less relevant. ---- Also notice in the above video that Jordan Peterson is talking about Feminism and saying that he agree with Feminism on equality of opportunities, but he doesn't agree with being equity, but i think he is not thinking correctly since he is too vague, since read for example what i am saying about Meritocracy: Read the following article about Meritocracy from the Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/12/meritocracy/418074/ So as you notice it says: "The pursuit of meritocracy is more difficult than it appears," So i think in Meritocracy we can not be strict equality, so we have to get into the details and into the calculations to tune it correctly and efficiently so that to make Meritocracy efficient and at the same time less problematic, but we have to notice that Meritocracy is still important. Yet more political philosophy about decentralization.. We can say the following: The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles. But i ask a smart question of: Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ? Here is my answer: But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU But notice in my above link that i am saying that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration, and i think that it is this new more efficient model of seeking like a balance between competition and collaboration that is the "cause" of bringing decentralization that brings efficiency, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration. And since i am talking in my following thoughts about the socialist state of Algeria, here is my thoughts about socialism: More political philosophy about socialism.. I think that socialism today as a system is a result of an inferior act of human nature that has the tendency to being too much dictatorship or too much fascism, socialism is like measuring individual smartness with only smartness that comes from genetics neglecting smartness that comes from culture, it is like neglecting to reason about some important variables in the system in the context of this Globalization, it is also too much idealism that neglects to see the weaknesses of socialism in the reality and in practice, you will notice that even socialism in Democracy is a bad thing, but socialism of a dictatorship is even worse , since like in optimization in mathematics, since socialism has the tendency to make the government too big and inefficient, because it is simply socialism, so how to be safe from this act of socialism ? and since socialism has the tendency to make taxes too much high, so this is not competitive in the context of this Globalization that needs efficiency of competitiveness, and in dictatorship of Socialism we are not safe from corruption of the government, and corruption in morality can be lack of efficiency , so how can we "escape" this corruption in a dictatorship? so you are noticing with me that dictatorship is a big problem(read about it below on my writing to understand better),also since socialism is solidarity so it also has the tendency to help too much the national companies that are deficient and this not good and this even engender too much debt and this is not good in the context of this Globalization that needs competitiveness, and let us take a look at my writing about socialism in Democracy, it is not even in dictatorship, here is how it looks like: Now I will talk about some deficiencies of socialism like high taxation.. I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on economic growth, productivity and innovation. Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party, I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France. He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes. As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp, the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is indeed egalitarianism. But i have to be more technical about lowering the taxation, here is what i will also technically say: It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the multiplier tax effect: indeed, it results in an increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and employment. Here is the video of Francois Hollande where he said that he doesn't like the rich: "Je n'aime pas les riches" F-Hollande https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui17eyLcJfk Read my following previous thoughts to understand: Read the following: From Centralized to Decentralized Governance https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/1999/12/dillinge.htm And read my following previous thoughts: More political philosophy about how Algeria Liberalized Its Socialist System.. I have just read the following interesting article about Algeria: Algeria Liberalizes Its Socialist System https://www.nytimes.com/1982/05/07/business/algeria-liberalizes-its-socialist-system.html You will quickly notice in the above article the deficiencies of a centralized way of managing or governing, this is why in the above article Algeria has decentralized for much better efficiency, and notice that today Algeria is still a socialist country, but its socialism is much more "pragmatic"(that understand the way of decentralization for better efficiency etc.), and notice in the following article about a new law in today Algeria: Necessary implementation of a strategy and a law governing digital startups https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fedition.legal-doctrine.com%2Fprojet-de-loi-start-up-algerie%2F So as you are noticing that you have to understand it using logical abstraction, i mean that with this new law Algeria wants to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, i mean you can easily notice it by the fact that socialist state of Algeria wants to have a certain level of control so that to avoid Risks, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, read more my following thoughts to notice: And read my following thoughts: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU More political philosophy about efficiency.. Look at the following video from Russia: Putin: If Russia Has No Technological Breakthrough Soon, We Will Fall Far Behind! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OEUTGaxZlI I think we have not to be pessimistic, since as you notice that we are becoming more and more efficient with the help |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 04:51PM -0700 Hello.. More political philosophy about smartness and more.. Please read below how i am defining being genetically a good human artist.. What do you think is smartness ? If i say: 2 + 2 = 4 So are you capable of seeing smartness ? So if you are smart you will not only look at the equality of: 2 + 2 = 4, but you will also look at the constrains by saying that with 2 + 2 = 4 you are not learning much and by saying that we have to verify if learning is constrained by the envirenment(like too much limited or so), so now you are understanding what is smartness, and now you are seeing that saying that smartness is genetical and cultural is not the right abstraction, because the envirenment can also constrain too much that we can say that we are not smart. Yet more political philosophy about smartness.. I think i am smart, so i will talk more about smartness, smartness permits to learn, so we can abstract and say that smartness is like learning, so we can measure smartness by looking at "quality" of learning, so then if the learning is constrained by the envirenment it can can hurt the quality of learning and we can say that we are not smart, but there is still something about smartness, it is that smartness can be artificial or biologic, for example when you look at how the Sun causes lightning on earth, we can then learn from this system of Sun that is causing lightening on earth, and this learning from this system is artificial intelligence and it is smartness , so we can say that our universe also contains such systems that contains smartness of artificial intelligence and we can also say that we can also construct artificial intelligence. So i think we can say that the capacity of being genetically a good human artist is artificial intelligence and it is smartness, since i view it as a mechanism or as a system that is artificial intelligence, but we have not to be pessimistic about the social mobility, since it depends on other factors than artifical or biologic Smartness, and here is what i have just said about it: More political philosophy about social mobility.. I have just read the following article: https://www.redpepper.org.uk/social-mobility-is-capitalisms-cover-story/ So as you are noticing it says: "The prominent sociologist Michael Young claimed that fixed social strata were the regrettable consequence of a meritocratic society, as those who had secured higher positions through merit would use their advantage to ensure their offspring were able to secure similarly superior positions for themselves." But he is too pessimistic, since i think that we have to take into account the "context", i think with the current sophistication of internet and the abundance of knowledge on internet, i think this also enhance much more creativity and productivity, and also because of digitalization and by doing business on internet and on the social medias like Facebook and youtube etc. you can "quickly" exponentially grow your number customers and this will enhance much more social mobility, since as i said about Digitalization: Digitalization: Once something goes from physical to digital, it gains the ability to grow exponentially. So we have not to be pessimistic. And this is related to my following thoughts, read them carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU Also capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth Read more here: http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth More political philosophy about communism of China and communism.. You have to understand that communism of China of today is much more "modern", i think that it lets many become very rich, but it taxes the rich much more and that benefits its socialism, and it demands a greater "loyalty" of the Rich to the communist party of China, and i think that communism China is much more capable because China is a much more bigger and powerful country. Read the following article to notice it: China's Communist Party demands private sector's loyalty as external risks rise https://www.journalpioneer.com/business/reuters/chinas-communist-party-demands-private-sectors-loyalty-as-external-risks-rise-497631/ And read the following article to notice it: More taxes for China's super rich will narrow income gap https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1136002.shtml This is why i just said (read below) that communism of China is "useful", i mean it is useful for China and it allows us to see why it is useful and that's useful too ! More political philosophy about more interesting subjects.. I have just looked at the following video, i invite you to look at it: Jordan Peterson | Full interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ruwVc0t2c0 I think that this Jordan Peterson is not smart by talking as he is talking about Marxism and Feminism, I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i will say that Jordan Peterson is talking about Marxism not correctly, because he is neglecting the "context" of Marxism, since we can say that Marxism is not "generally" a correct ideology, but Marxism can become "useful" in the context of Today world, so i will say that the Today communism of China is "useful", since here is what i have just said about it: --- But if you are not smart you will say that communism of China is evil, but this is not correct because you have to understand the essence of communism.. Here is how to explain it: There is competition and there is collaboration and solidarity, but competition has a problem, it is that it can monopolize too much, it is like the problem of monopoly that hurts competition and that hurts quality, so notice that today those that are smart or/and have more money are quickly making too much money with the help of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress, so this is a big problem for communism of China, so this is why communism of China of today is not confident with the private sector that is for them having this big problem, and this is why communism of China is not being confident with the West, so this why communism China of today is not wanting to become Democracy. So you can read my following thoughts about the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities to understand more(and i am giving a solution to it, so read it carefully): https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/wlJu5j1xhPk I think that there is a bug in the world system, and it is that we want in capitalism to be competition and competitiveness , this is why so that capitalist countries do attract investment and smart people they have accepted the fact that people make too much money quickly(and you have to understand the context of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress), so as you are noticing that this is making communism of China not wanting to become Democracy, or it is making socialism of other countries such as Algeria etc. not wanting to become capitalism. So the West has to solve the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities so that to make Marxism much less relevant. ---- Also notice in the above video that Jordan Peterson is talking about Feminism and saying that he agree with Feminism on equality of opportunities, but he doesn't agree with being equity, but i think he is not thinking correctly since he is too vague, since read for example what i am saying about Meritocracy: Read the following article about Meritocracy from the Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/12/meritocracy/418074/ So as you notice it says: "The pursuit of meritocracy is more difficult than it appears," So i think in Meritocracy we can not be strict equality, so we have to get into the details and into the calculations to tune it correctly and efficiently so that to make Meritocracy efficient and at the same time less problematic, but we have to notice that Meritocracy is still important. Yet more political philosophy about decentralization.. We can say the following: The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles. But i ask a smart question of: Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ? Here is my answer: But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU But notice in my above link that i am saying that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration, and i think that it is this new more efficient model of seeking like a balance between competition and collaboration that is the "cause" of bringing decentralization that brings efficiency, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration. And since i am talking in my following thoughts about the socialist state of Algeria, here is my thoughts about socialism: More political philosophy about socialism.. I think that socialism today as a system is a result of an inferior act of human nature that has the tendency to being too much dictatorship or too much fascism, socialism is like measuring individual smartness with only smartness that comes from genetics neglecting smartness that comes from culture, it is like neglecting to reason about some important variables in the system in the context of this Globalization, it is also too much idealism that neglects to see the weaknesses of socialism in the reality and in practice, you will notice that even socialism in Democracy is a bad thing, but socialism of a dictatorship is even worse , since like in optimization in mathematics, since socialism has the tendency to make the government too big and inefficient, because it is simply socialism, so how to be safe from this act of socialism ? and since socialism has the tendency to make taxes too much high, so this is not competitive in the context of this Globalization that needs efficiency of competitiveness, and in dictatorship of Socialism we are not safe from corruption of the government, and corruption in morality can be lack of efficiency , so how can we "escape" this corruption in a dictatorship? so you are noticing with me that dictatorship is a big problem(read about it below on my writing to understand better),also since socialism is solidarity so it also has the tendency to help too much the national companies that are deficient and this not good and this even engender too much debt and this is not good in the context of this Globalization that needs competitiveness, and let us take a look at my writing about socialism in Democracy, it is not even in dictatorship, here is how it looks like: Now I will talk about some deficiencies of socialism like high taxation.. I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on economic growth, productivity and innovation. Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party, I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France. He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes. As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp, the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is indeed egalitarianism. But i have to be more technical about lowering the taxation, here is what i will also technically say: It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the multiplier tax effect: indeed, it results in an increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and employment. Here is the video of Francois Hollande where he said that he doesn't like the rich: "Je n'aime pas les riches" F-Hollande https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui17eyLcJfk Read my following previous thoughts to understand: Read the following: From Centralized to Decentralized Governance https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/1999/12/dillinge.htm And read my following previous thoughts: More political philosophy about how Algeria Liberalized Its Socialist System.. I have just read the following interesting article about Algeria: Algeria Liberalizes Its Socialist System https://www.nytimes.com/1982/05/07/business/algeria-liberalizes-its-socialist-system.html You will quickly notice in the above article the deficiencies of a centralized way of managing or governing, this is why in the above article Algeria has decentralized for much better efficiency, and notice that today Algeria is still a socialist country, but its socialism is much more "pragmatic"(that understand the way of decentralization for better efficiency etc.), and notice in the following article about a new law in today Algeria: Necessary implementation of a strategy and a law governing digital startups https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fedition.legal-doctrine.com%2Fprojet-de-loi-start-up-algerie%2F So as you are noticing that you have to understand it using logical abstraction, i mean that with this new law Algeria wants to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, i mean you can easily notice it by the fact that socialist state of Algeria wants to have a certain level of control so that to avoid Risks, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, read more my following thoughts to notice: And read my following thoughts: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU More political philosophy about efficiency.. Look at the following video from Russia: Putin: If Russia Has No Technological Breakthrough Soon, We Will Fall Far Behind! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OEUTGaxZlI I think we have not to be pessimistic, since as you notice that we are becoming more and more efficient with the help of exponential growth of capitalism and with the help of exponential progress, so i think Russia too is understanding it and this is a positive thing, and as you are noticing that efficiency is about quality and productivity, so i invite you to read my following thoughts about quality and productivity to understand more: More political philosophy about mathematics and quality.. You have just seen me previously posting about mathematics, I think that mathematics also brings quality.. So i invite you to read my following thoughts to notice it: About Mathematics and Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D.. I have just read the following article about Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, i have just easily understood Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, so i invite you to read it carefully: https://www.alanzucconi.com/2018/05/02/ik-2d-1/ Yet more political philosophy about quality control and quality.. I am a white arab and i |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 03:56PM -0700 Hello.. More political philosophy about social mobility.. I have just read the following article: https://www.redpepper.org.uk/social-mobility-is-capitalisms-cover-story/ So as you are noticing it says: "The prominent sociologist Michael Young claimed that fixed social strata were the regrettable consequence of a meritocratic society, as those who had secured higher positions through merit would use their advantage to ensure their offspring were able to secure similarly superior positions for themselves." But he is too pessimistic, since i think that we have to take into account the "context", i think with the current sophistication of internet and the abundance of knowledge on internet, i think this also enhance much more creativity and productivity, and also because of digitalization and by doing business on internet and on the social medias like Facebook and youtube etc. you can "quickly" exponentially grow your number customers and this will enhance much more social mobility, since as i said about Digitalization: Digitalization: Once something goes from physical to digital, it gains the ability to grow exponentially. So we have not to be pessimistic. And this is related to my following thoughts, read them carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU Also capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth Read more here: http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth More political philosophy about communism of China and communism.. You have to understand that communism of China of today is much more "modern", i think that it lets many become very rich, but it taxes the rich much more and that benefits its socialism, and it demands a greater "loyalty" of the Rich to the communist party of China, and i think that communism China is much more capable because China is a much more bigger and powerful country. Read the following article to notice it: China's Communist Party demands private sector's loyalty as external risks rise https://www.journalpioneer.com/business/reuters/chinas-communist-party-demands-private-sectors-loyalty-as-external-risks-rise-497631/ And read the following article to notice it: More taxes for China's super rich will narrow income gap https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1136002.shtml This is why i just said (read below) that communism of China is "useful", i mean it is useful for China and it allows us to see why it is useful and that's useful too ! More political philosophy about more interesting subjects.. I have just looked at the following video, i invite you to look at it: Jordan Peterson | Full interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ruwVc0t2c0 I think that this Jordan Peterson is not smart by talking as he is talking about Marxism and Feminism, I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i will say that Jordan Peterson is talking about Marxism not correctly, because he is neglecting the "context" of Marxism, since we can say that Marxism is not "generally" a correct ideology, but Marxism can become "useful" in the context of Today world, so i will say that the Today communism of China is "useful", since here is what i have just said about it: --- But if you are not smart you will say that communism of China is evil, but this is not correct because you have to understand the essence of communism.. Here is how to explain it: There is competition and there is collaboration and solidarity, but competition has a problem, it is that it can monopolize too much, it is like the problem of monopoly that hurts competition and that hurts quality, so notice that today those that are smart or/and have more money are quickly making too much money with the help of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress, so this is a big problem for communism of China, so this is why communism of China of today is not confident with the private sector that is for them having this big problem, and this is why communism of China is not being confident with the West, so this why communism China of today is not wanting to become Democracy. So you can read my following thoughts about the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities to understand more(and i am giving a solution to it, so read it carefully): https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/wlJu5j1xhPk I think that there is a bug in the world system, and it is that we want in capitalism to be competition and competitiveness , this is why so that capitalist countries do attract investment and smart people they have accepted the fact that people make too much money quickly(and you have to understand the context of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress), so as you are noticing that this is making communism of China not wanting to become Democracy, or it is making socialism of other countries such as Algeria etc. not wanting to become capitalism. So the West has to solve the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities so that to make Marxism much less relevant. ---- Also notice in the above video that Jordan Peterson is talking about Feminism and saying that he agree with Feminism on equality of opportunities, but he doesn't agree with being equity, but i think he is not thinking correctly since he is too vague, since read for example what i am saying about Meritocracy: Read the following article about Meritocracy from the Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/12/meritocracy/418074/ So as you notice it says: "The pursuit of meritocracy is more difficult than it appears," So i think in Meritocracy we can not be strict equality, so we have to get into the details and into the calculations to tune it correctly and efficiently so that to make Meritocracy efficient and at the same time less problematic, but we have to notice that Meritocracy is still important. Yet more political philosophy about decentralization.. We can say the following: The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles. But i ask a smart question of: Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ? Here is my answer: But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU But notice in my above link that i am saying that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration, and i think that it is this new more efficient model of seeking like a balance between competition and collaboration that is the "cause" of bringing decentralization that brings efficiency, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration. And since i am talking in my following thoughts about the socialist state of Algeria, here is my thoughts about socialism: More political philosophy about socialism.. I think that socialism today as a system is a result of an inferior act of human nature that has the tendency to being too much dictatorship or too much fascism, socialism is like measuring individual smartness with only smartness that comes from genetics neglecting smartness that comes from culture, it is like neglecting to reason about some important variables in the system in the context of this Globalization, it is also too much idealism that neglects to see the weaknesses of socialism in the reality and in practice, you will notice that even socialism in Democracy is a bad thing, but socialism of a dictatorship is even worse , since like in optimization in mathematics, since socialism has the tendency to make the government too big and inefficient, because it is simply socialism, so how to be safe from this act of socialism ? and since socialism has the tendency to make taxes too much high, so this is not competitive in the context of this Globalization that needs efficiency of competitiveness, and in dictatorship of Socialism we are not safe from corruption of the government, and corruption in morality can be lack of efficiency , so how can we "escape" this corruption in a dictatorship? so you are noticing with me that dictatorship is a big problem(read about it below on my writing to understand better),also since socialism is solidarity so it also has the tendency to help too much the national companies that are deficient and this not good and this even engender too much debt and this is not good in the context of this Globalization that needs competitiveness, and let us take a look at my writing about socialism in Democracy, it is not even in dictatorship, here is how it looks like: Now I will talk about some deficiencies of socialism like high taxation.. I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on economic growth, productivity and innovation. Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party, I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France. He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes. As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp, the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is indeed egalitarianism. But i have to be more technical about lowering the taxation, here is what i will also technically say: It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the multiplier tax effect: indeed, it results in an increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and employment. Here is the video of Francois Hollande where he said that he doesn't like the rich: "Je n'aime pas les riches" F-Hollande https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui17eyLcJfk Read my following previous thoughts to understand: Read the following: From Centralized to Decentralized Governance https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/1999/12/dillinge.htm And read my following previous thoughts: More political philosophy about how Algeria Liberalized Its Socialist System.. I have just read the following interesting article about Algeria: Algeria Liberalizes Its Socialist System https://www.nytimes.com/1982/05/07/business/algeria-liberalizes-its-socialist-system.html You will quickly notice in the above article the deficiencies of a centralized way of managing or governing, this is why in the above article Algeria has decentralized for much better efficiency, and notice that today Algeria is still a socialist country, but its socialism is much more "pragmatic"(that understand the way of decentralization for better efficiency etc.), and notice in the following article about a new law in today Algeria: Necessary implementation of a strategy and a law governing digital startups https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fedition.legal-doctrine.com%2Fprojet-de-loi-start-up-algerie%2F So as you are noticing that you have to understand it using logical abstraction, i mean that with this new law Algeria wants to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, i mean you can easily notice it by the fact that socialist state of Algeria wants to have a certain level of control so that to avoid Risks, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, read more my following thoughts to notice: And read my following thoughts: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU More political philosophy about efficiency.. Look at the following video from Russia: Putin: If Russia Has No Technological Breakthrough Soon, We Will Fall Far Behind! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OEUTGaxZlI I think we have not to be pessimistic, since as you notice that we are becoming more and more efficient with the help of exponential growth of capitalism and with the help of exponential progress, so i think Russia too is understanding it and this is a positive thing, and as you are noticing that efficiency is about quality and productivity, so i invite you to read my following thoughts about quality and productivity to understand more: More political philosophy about mathematics and quality.. You have just seen me previously posting about mathematics, I think that mathematics also brings quality.. So i invite you to read my following thoughts to notice it: About Mathematics and Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D.. I have just read the following article about Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, i have just easily understood Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, so i invite you to read it carefully: https://www.alanzucconi.com/2018/05/02/ik-2d-1/ Yet more political philosophy about quality control and quality.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms.. So first you have to define quality(read below about it) and second you have to construct quality and third you have to control quality. So, I have just read the following about the Central Limit Theorem (I understood it), i invite you to read it carefully: https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter7/7_1_2_central_limit_theorem.php So as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is so important for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)): An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC) https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal So I have provided you in my PERT++ with the following functions: function NormalDistA (const Mean, StdDev, AVal, BVal: Extended): Single; function NormalDistP (const Mean, StdDev, AVal: Extended): Single; function InvNormalDist(const Mean, StdDev, PVal: Extended; const Less: Boolean): Extended; For NormalDistA() or NormalDistP(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the probability of the value Aval or the probability between the values of Aval and Bval. For InvNormalDist(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 01:58PM -0700 Hello.. More political philosophy about communism of China and communism.. You have to understand that communism of China of today is much more "modern", i think that it lets many become very rich, but it taxes the rich much more and that benefits its socialism, and it demands a greater "loyalty" of the Rich to the communist party of China, and i think that communism China is much more capable because China is a much more bigger and powerful country. Read the following article to notice it: China's Communist Party demands private sector's loyalty as external risks rise https://www.journalpioneer.com/business/reuters/chinas-communist-party-demands-private-sectors-loyalty-as-external-risks-rise-497631/ And read the following article to notice it: More taxes for China's super rich will narrow income gap https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1136002.shtml This is why i just said (read below) that communism of China is "useful", i mean it is useful for China and it allows us to see why it is useful and that's useful too ! More political philosophy about more interesting subjects.. I have just looked at the following video, i invite you to look at it: Jordan Peterson | Full interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ruwVc0t2c0 I think that this Jordan Peterson is not smart by talking as he is talking about Marxism and Feminism, I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i will say that Jordan Peterson is talking about Marxism not correctly, because he is neglecting the "context" of Marxism, since we can say that Marxism is not "generally" a correct ideology, but Marxism can become "useful" in the context of Today world, so i will say that the Today communism of China is "useful", since here is what i have just said about it: --- But if you are not smart you will say that communism of China is evil, but this is not correct because you have to understand the essence of communism.. Here is how to explain it: There is competition and there is collaboration and solidarity, but competition has a problem, it is that it can monopolize too much, it is like the problem of monopoly that hurts competition and that hurts quality, so notice that today those that are smart or/and have more money are quickly making too much money with the help of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress, so this is a big problem for communism of China, so this is why communism of China of today is not confident with the private sector that is for them having this big problem, and this is why communism of China is not being confident with the West, so this why communism China of today is not wanting to become Democracy. So you can read my following thoughts about the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities to understand more(and i am giving a solution to it, so read it carefully): https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/wlJu5j1xhPk I think that there is a bug in the world system, and it is that we want in capitalism to be competition and competitiveness , this is why so that capitalist countries do attract investment and smart people they have accepted the fact that people make too much money quickly(and you have to understand the context of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress), so as you are noticing that this is making communism of China not wanting to become Democracy, or it is making socialism of other countries such as Algeria etc. not wanting to become capitalism. So the West has to solve the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities so that to make Marxism much less relevant. ---- Also notice in the above video that Jordan Peterson is talking about Feminism and saying that he agree with Feminism on equality of opportunities, but he doesn't agree with being equity, but i think he is not thinking correctly since he is too vague, since read for example what i am saying about Meritocracy: Read the following article about Meritocracy from the Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/12/meritocracy/418074/ So as you notice it says: "The pursuit of meritocracy is more difficult than it appears," So i think in Meritocracy we can not be strict equality, so we have to get into the details and into the calculations to tune it correctly and efficiently so that to make Meritocracy efficient and at the same time less problematic, but we have to notice that Meritocracy is still important. Yet more political philosophy about decentralization.. We can say the following: The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles. But i ask a smart question of: Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ? Here is my answer: But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU But notice in my above link that i am saying that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration, and i think that it is this new more efficient model of seeking like a balance between competition and collaboration that is the "cause" of bringing decentralization that brings efficiency, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration. And since i am talking in my following thoughts about the socialist state of Algeria, here is my thoughts about socialism: More political philosophy about socialism.. I think that socialism today as a system is a result of an inferior act of human nature that has the tendency to being too much dictatorship or too much fascism, socialism is like measuring individual smartness with only smartness that comes from genetics neglecting smartness that comes from culture, it is like neglecting to reason about some important variables in the system in the context of this Globalization, it is also too much idealism that neglects to see the weaknesses of socialism in the reality and in practice, you will notice that even socialism in Democracy is a bad thing, but socialism of a dictatorship is even worse , since like in optimization in mathematics, since socialism has the tendency to make the government too big and inefficient, because it is simply socialism, so how to be safe from this act of socialism ? and since socialism has the tendency to make taxes too much high, so this is not competitive in the context of this Globalization that needs efficiency of competitiveness, and in dictatorship of Socialism we are not safe from corruption of the government, and corruption in morality can be lack of efficiency , so how can we "escape" this corruption in a dictatorship? so you are noticing with me that dictatorship is a big problem(read about it below on my writing to understand better),also since socialism is solidarity so it also has the tendency to help too much the national companies that are deficient and this not good and this even engender too much debt and this is not good in the context of this Globalization that needs competitiveness, and let us take a look at my writing about socialism in Democracy, it is not even in dictatorship, here is how it looks like: Now I will talk about some deficiencies of socialism like high taxation.. I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on economic growth, productivity and innovation. Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party, I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France. He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes. As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp, the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is indeed egalitarianism. But i have to be more technical about lowering the taxation, here is what i will also technically say: It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the multiplier tax effect: indeed, it results in an increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and employment. Here is the video of Francois Hollande where he said that he doesn't like the rich: "Je n'aime pas les riches" F-Hollande https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui17eyLcJfk Read my following previous thoughts to understand: Read the following: From Centralized to Decentralized Governance https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/1999/12/dillinge.htm And read my following previous thoughts: More political philosophy about how Algeria Liberalized Its Socialist System.. I have just read the following interesting article about Algeria: Algeria Liberalizes Its Socialist System https://www.nytimes.com/1982/05/07/business/algeria-liberalizes-its-socialist-system.html You will quickly notice in the above article the deficiencies of a centralized way of managing or governing, this is why in the above article Algeria has decentralized for much better efficiency, and notice that today Algeria is still a socialist country, but its socialism is much more "pragmatic"(that understand the way of decentralization for better efficiency etc.), and notice in the following article about a new law in today Algeria: Necessary implementation of a strategy and a law governing digital startups https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fedition.legal-doctrine.com%2Fprojet-de-loi-start-up-algerie%2F So as you are noticing that you have to understand it using logical abstraction, i mean that with this new law Algeria wants to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, i mean you can easily notice it by the fact that socialist state of Algeria wants to have a certain level of control so that to avoid Risks, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, read more my following thoughts to notice: And read my following thoughts: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU More political philosophy about efficiency.. Look at the following video from Russia: Putin: If Russia Has No Technological Breakthrough Soon, We Will Fall Far Behind! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OEUTGaxZlI I think we have not to be pessimistic, since as you notice that we are becoming more and more efficient with the help of exponential growth of capitalism and with the help of exponential progress, so i think Russia too is understanding it and this is a positive thing, and as you are noticing that efficiency is about quality and productivity, so i invite you to read my following thoughts about quality and productivity to understand more: More political philosophy about mathematics and quality.. You have just seen me previously posting about mathematics, I think that mathematics also brings quality.. So i invite you to read my following thoughts to notice it: About Mathematics and Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D.. I have just read the following article about Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, i have just easily understood Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, so i invite you to read it carefully: https://www.alanzucconi.com/2018/05/02/ik-2d-1/ Yet more political philosophy about quality control and quality.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms.. So first you have to define quality(read below about it) and second you have to construct quality and third you have to control quality. So, I have just read the following about the Central Limit Theorem (I understood it), i invite you to read it carefully: https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter7/7_1_2_central_limit_theorem.php So as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is so important for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)): An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC) https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal So I have provided you in my PERT++ with the following functions: function NormalDistA (const Mean, StdDev, AVal, BVal: Extended): Single; function NormalDistP (const Mean, StdDev, AVal: Extended): Single; function InvNormalDist(const Mean, StdDev, PVal: Extended; const Less: Boolean): Extended; For NormalDistA() or NormalDistP(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the probability of the value Aval or the probability between the values of Aval and Bval. For InvNormalDist(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the length of the critical path of the probability PVal, and when Less is TRUE, you will obtain a cumulative distribution. So as you are noticing from my above thoughts that since PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So then you have to use my above functions that are Normal distribution and inverse normal distribution functions, please look at my demo inside my zip file to understand better how i am doing it: You can download and read about my PERT++ from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal And about productivity, read my following smart thoughts to understand: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity So as you are noticing i am saying: "Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger than the Serial productivity |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 11:52AM -0700 Hello.. More political philosophy about more interesting subjects.. I have just looked at the following video, i invite you to look at it: Jordan Peterson | Full interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ruwVc0t2c0 I think that this Jordan Peterson is not smart by talking as he is talking about Marxism and Feminism, I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i will say that Jordan Peterson is talking about Marxism not correctly, because he is neglecting the "context" of Marxism, since we can say that Marxism is not "generally" a correct ideology, but Marxism can become "useful" in the context of Today world, so i will say that the Today communism of China is "useful", since here is what i have just said about it: --- But if you are not smart you will say that communism of China is evil, but this is not correct because you have to understand the essence of communism.. Here is how to explain it: There is competition and there is collaboration and solidarity, but competition has a problem, it is that it can monopolize too much, it is like the problem of monopoly that hurts competition and that hurts quality, so notice that today those that are smart or/and have more money are quickly making too much money with the help of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress, so this is a big problem for communism of China, so this is why communism of China of today is not confident with the private sector that is for them having this big problem, and this is why communism of China is not being confident with the West, so this why communism China of today is not wanting to become Democracy. So you can read my following thoughts about the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities to understand more(and i am giving a solution to it, so read it carefully): https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/wlJu5j1xhPk I think that there is a bug in the world system, and it is that we want in capitalism to be competition and competitiveness , this is why so that capitalist countries do attract investment and smart people they have accepted the fact that people make too much money quickly(and you have to understand the context of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress), so as you are noticing that this is making communism of China not wanting to become Democracy, or it is making socialism of other countries such as Algeria etc. not wanting to become capitalism. So the West has to solve the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities so that to make Marxism much less relevant. ---- Also notice in the above video that Jordan Peterson is talking about Feminism and saying that he agree with Feminism on equality of opportunities, but he doesn't agree with being equity, but i think he is not thinking correctly since he is too vague, since read for example what i am saying about Meritocracy: Read the following article about Meritocracy from the Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/12/meritocracy/418074/ So as you notice it says: "The pursuit of meritocracy is more difficult than it appears," So i think in Meritocracy we can not be strict equality, so we have to get into the details and into the calculations to tune it correctly and efficiently so that to make Meritocracy efficient and at the same time less problematic, but we have to notice that Meritocracy is still important. Yet more political philosophy about decentralization.. We can say the following: The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles. But i ask a smart question of: Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ? Here is my answer: But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU But notice in my above link that i am saying that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration, and i think that it is this new more efficient model of seeking like a balance between competition and collaboration that is the "cause" of bringing decentralization that brings efficiency, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration. And since i am talking in my following thoughts about the socialist state of Algeria, here is my thoughts about socialism: More political philosophy about socialism.. I think that socialism today as a system is a result of an inferior act of human nature that has the tendency to being too much dictatorship or too much fascism, socialism is like measuring individual smartness with only smartness that comes from genetics neglecting smartness that comes from culture, it is like neglecting to reason about some important variables in the system in the context of this Globalization, it is also too much idealism that neglects to see the weaknesses of socialism in the reality and in practice, you will notice that even socialism in Democracy is a bad thing, but socialism of a dictatorship is even worse , since like in optimization in mathematics, since socialism has the tendency to make the government too big and inefficient, because it is simply socialism, so how to be safe from this act of socialism ? and since socialism has the tendency to make taxes too much high, so this is not competitive in the context of this Globalization that needs efficiency of competitiveness, and in dictatorship of Socialism we are not safe from corruption of the government, and corruption in morality can be lack of efficiency , so how can we "escape" this corruption in a dictatorship? so you are noticing with me that dictatorship is a big problem(read about it below on my writing to understand better),also since socialism is solidarity so it also has the tendency to help too much the national companies that are deficient and this not good and this even engender too much debt and this is not good in the context of this Globalization that needs competitiveness, and let us take a look at my writing about socialism in Democracy, it is not even in dictatorship, here is how it looks like: Now I will talk about some deficiencies of socialism like high taxation.. I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on economic growth, productivity and innovation. Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party, I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France. He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes. As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp, the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is indeed egalitarianism. But i have to be more technical about lowering the taxation, here is what i will also technically say: It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the multiplier tax effect: indeed, it results in an increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and employment. Here is the video of Francois Hollande where he said that he doesn't like the rich: "Je n'aime pas les riches" F-Hollande https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui17eyLcJfk Read my following previous thoughts to understand: Read the following: From Centralized to Decentralized Governance https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/1999/12/dillinge.htm And read my following previous thoughts: More political philosophy about how Algeria Liberalized Its Socialist System.. I have just read the following interesting article about Algeria: Algeria Liberalizes Its Socialist System https://www.nytimes.com/1982/05/07/business/algeria-liberalizes-its-socialist-system.html You will quickly notice in the above article the deficiencies of a centralized way of managing or governing, this is why in the above article Algeria has decentralized for much better efficiency, and notice that today Algeria is still a socialist country, but its socialism is much more "pragmatic"(that understand the way of decentralization for better efficiency etc.), and notice in the following article about a new law in today Algeria: Necessary implementation of a strategy and a law governing digital startups https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fedition.legal-doctrine.com%2Fprojet-de-loi-start-up-algerie%2F So as you are noticing that you have to understand it using logical abstraction, i mean that with this new law Algeria wants to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, i mean you can easily notice it by the fact that socialist state of Algeria wants to have a certain level of control so that to avoid Risks, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, read more my following thoughts to notice: And read my following thoughts: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU More political philosophy about efficiency.. Look at the following video from Russia: Putin: If Russia Has No Technological Breakthrough Soon, We Will Fall Far Behind! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OEUTGaxZlI I think we have not to be pessimistic, since as you notice that we are becoming more and more efficient with the help of exponential growth of capitalism and with the help of exponential progress, so i think Russia too is understanding it and this is a positive thing, and as you are noticing that efficiency is about quality and productivity, so i invite you to read my following thoughts about quality and productivity to understand more: More political philosophy about mathematics and quality.. You have just seen me previously posting about mathematics, I think that mathematics also brings quality.. So i invite you to read my following thoughts to notice it: About Mathematics and Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D.. I have just read the following article about Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, i have just easily understood Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, so i invite you to read it carefully: https://www.alanzucconi.com/2018/05/02/ik-2d-1/ Yet more political philosophy about quality control and quality.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms.. So first you have to define quality(read below about it) and second you have to construct quality and third you have to control quality. So, I have just read the following about the Central Limit Theorem (I understood it), i invite you to read it carefully: https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter7/7_1_2_central_limit_theorem.php So as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is so important for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)): An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC) https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal So I have provided you in my PERT++ with the following functions: function NormalDistA (const Mean, StdDev, AVal, BVal: Extended): Single; function NormalDistP (const Mean, StdDev, AVal: Extended): Single; function InvNormalDist(const Mean, StdDev, PVal: Extended; const Less: Boolean): Extended; For NormalDistA() or NormalDistP(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the probability of the value Aval or the probability between the values of Aval and Bval. For InvNormalDist(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the length of the critical path of the probability PVal, and when Less is TRUE, you will obtain a cumulative distribution. So as you are noticing from my above thoughts that since PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So then you have to use my above functions that are Normal distribution and inverse normal distribution functions, please look at my demo inside my zip file to understand better how i am doing it: You can download and read about my PERT++ from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal And about productivity, read my following smart thoughts to understand: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity So as you are noticing i am saying: "Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger than the Serial productivity part, so productivity can scale much more (and it is like Gustafson's Law)." So as you are noticing that my answer about productivity is smart. More political philosophy of what is quality.. I have just read the following article about what is quality, i invite you to read it: https://www.cmc-global.org/content/why-quality-so-important-organization And notice that it says: "What is "Quality"? We can define the term "quality" in many ways, but the ISO family of standards gives a very concise definition: "quality - the degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfils requirements." (ISO 9000:2005 – 3.1.1)." So i think that this definition is also in accordance with my previous thoughts of my political philosophy, since notice that the requirements in the definition are both requirements by the people that use quality and requirements by the individual or group who bring quality, and notice that the requirements of the individual or group who bring quality have to adhere to the |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 28 10:51AM -0700 Hello.. Yet more political philosophy about decentralization.. We can say the following: The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles. But i ask a smart question of: Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ? Here is my answer: But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU But notice in my above link that i am saying that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration, and i think that it is this new more efficient model of seeking like a balance between competition and collaboration that is the "cause" of bringing decentralization that brings efficiency, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration. And since i am talking in my following thoughts about the socialist state of Algeria, here is my thoughts about socialism: More political philosophy about socialism.. I think that socialism today as a system is a result of an inferior act of human nature that has the tendency to being too much dictatorship or too much fascism, socialism is like measuring individual smartness with only smartness that comes from genetics neglecting smartness that comes from culture, it is like neglecting to reason about some important variables in the system in the context of this Globalization, it is also too much idealism that neglects to see the weaknesses of socialism in the reality and in practice, you will notice that even socialism in Democracy is a bad thing, but socialism of a dictatorship is even worse , since like in optimization in mathematics, since socialism has the tendency to make the government too big and inefficient, because it is simply socialism, so how to be safe from this act of socialism ? and since socialism has the tendency to make taxes too much high, so this is not competitive in the context of this Globalization that needs efficiency of competitiveness, and in dictatorship of Socialism we are not safe from corruption of the government, and corruption in morality can be lack of efficiency , so how can we "escape" this corruption in a dictatorship? so you are noticing with me that dictatorship is a big problem(read about it below on my writing to understand better),also since socialism is solidarity so it also has the tendency to help too much the national companies that are deficient and this not good and this even engender too much debt and this is not good in the context of this Globalization that needs competitiveness, and let us take a look at my writing about socialism in Democracy, it is not even in dictatorship, here is how it looks like: Now I will talk about some deficiencies of socialism like high taxation.. I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on economic growth, productivity and innovation. Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party, I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France. He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes. As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp, the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is indeed egalitarianism. But i have to be more technical about lowering the taxation, here is what i will also technically say: It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the multiplier tax effect: indeed, it results in an increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and employment. Here is the video of Francois Hollande where he said that he doesn't like the rich: "Je n'aime pas les riches" F-Hollande https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui17eyLcJfk Read my following previous thoughts to understand: Read the following: From Centralized to Decentralized Governance https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/1999/12/dillinge.htm And read my following previous thoughts: More political philosophy about how Algeria Liberalized Its Socialist System.. I have just read the following interesting article about Algeria: Algeria Liberalizes Its Socialist System https://www.nytimes.com/1982/05/07/business/algeria-liberalizes-its-socialist-system.html You will quickly notice in the above article the deficiencies of a centralized way of managing or governing, this is why in the above article Algeria has decentralized for much better efficiency, and notice that today Algeria is still a socialist country, but its socialism is much more "pragmatic"(that understand the way of decentralization for better efficiency etc.), and notice in the following article about a new law in today Algeria: Necessary implementation of a strategy and a law governing digital startups https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fedition.legal-doctrine.com%2Fprojet-de-loi-start-up-algerie%2F So as you are noticing that you have to understand it using logical abstraction, i mean that with this new law Algeria wants to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, i mean you can easily notice it by the fact that socialist state of Algeria wants to have a certain level of control so that to avoid Risks, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, read more my following thoughts to notice: And read my following thoughts: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU More political philosophy about efficiency.. Look at the following video from Russia: Putin: If Russia Has No Technological Breakthrough Soon, We Will Fall Far Behind! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OEUTGaxZlI I think we have not to be pessimistic, since as you notice that we are becoming more and more efficient with the help of exponential growth of capitalism and with the help of exponential progress, so i think Russia too is understanding it and this is a positive thing, and as you are noticing that efficiency is about quality and productivity, so i invite you to read my following thoughts about quality and productivity to understand more: More political philosophy about mathematics and quality.. You have just seen me previously posting about mathematics, I think that mathematics also brings quality.. So i invite you to read my following thoughts to notice it: About Mathematics and Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D.. I have just read the following article about Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, i have just easily understood Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, so i invite you to read it carefully: https://www.alanzucconi.com/2018/05/02/ik-2d-1/ Yet more political philosophy about quality control and quality.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms.. So first you have to define quality(read below about it) and second you have to construct quality and third you have to control quality. So, I have just read the following about the Central Limit Theorem (I understood it), i invite you to read it carefully: https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter7/7_1_2_central_limit_theorem.php So as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is so important for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)): An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC) https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal So I have provided you in my PERT++ with the following functions: function NormalDistA (const Mean, StdDev, AVal, BVal: Extended): Single; function NormalDistP (const Mean, StdDev, AVal: Extended): Single; function InvNormalDist(const Mean, StdDev, PVal: Extended; const Less: Boolean): Extended; For NormalDistA() or NormalDistP(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the probability of the value Aval or the probability between the values of Aval and Bval. For InvNormalDist(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the length of the critical path of the probability PVal, and when Less is TRUE, you will obtain a cumulative distribution. So as you are noticing from my above thoughts that since PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So then you have to use my above functions that are Normal distribution and inverse normal distribution functions, please look at my demo inside my zip file to understand better how i am doing it: You can download and read about my PERT++ from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal And about productivity, read my following smart thoughts to understand: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity So as you are noticing i am saying: "Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger than the Serial productivity part, so productivity can scale much more (and it is like Gustafson's Law)." So as you are noticing that my answer about productivity is smart. More political philosophy of what is quality.. I have just read the following article about what is quality, i invite you to read it: https://www.cmc-global.org/content/why-quality-so-important-organization And notice that it says: "What is "Quality"? We can define the term "quality" in many ways, but the ISO family of standards gives a very concise definition: "quality - the degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfils requirements." (ISO 9000:2005 – 3.1.1)." So i think that this definition is also in accordance with my previous thoughts of my political philosophy, since notice that the requirements in the definition are both requirements by the people that use quality and requirements by the individual or group who bring quality, and notice that the requirements of the individual or group who bring quality have to adhere to the following, read my following thoughts to understand: More political philosophy about civilization.. So first you are noticing that we have to be Meritocracy, but Meritocracy has to define what is the right "value", is the right value only a useful utility ? so now you are understanding that if we define it by simply saying that it is a useful utility to people, so now we are not respecting the principles of Morality, since we have to make our civilization go forward towards more and more perfection, so this going forward towards more and more perfection sets the usefulness of the utility , so then it sets the value, so then you are noticing that Morality is like going forward towards more and more perfection and this process enhance the "quality" and the quality of the utility, so then it sets the value and it sets the usefulness of the utility, and i think this is part of the essence of a civilization. So read my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality here to notice it: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 More political philosophy about efficiency.. Today i will speak about the most important subject and it is: How to be efficient ? I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i will answer this question as follows: You have to be both good productivity and good quality. Now my answer is a high level abstraction, so i will go into the lower layers of abstraction: So, to be efficient productivity, here is what you have to do: Read my following smart thoughts to understand: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity So as you are noticing i am saying: "Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger than the Serial productivity part, so productivity can scale much more (and it is like Gustafson's Law)." So as you are noticing that my answer about productivity is smart. And now how to be good in quality? You have to be smart(and use you fluid intelligence efficiently) and efficiently learn how to learn and efficiently learn. So as you are noticing that the constant factors in the human population are genetical, so the very important thing to notice is that to be good in quality you have to have a good education and an awareness, and of course you have, like in genetic algorithms, to know how to efficiently optimize locally(by exploitation) and globally(by exploration and diversification) so that to be optimal optimization. And of course there is individual efficiency and the group efficiency, but you have to be smart and notice that you have to know about the exponential progress and how to exponentially progress, so read my following thoughts to understand about it: Here is the 6 D's of Exponential Growth: Digitalization: Once something goes from physical to digital, it gains the ability to grow exponentially. Deception: Initial exponential growth is such small increases (.01 to .02) that it goes largely unnoticed. Disruption: Either a new market is created, or an old one is overturned. You either disrupt yourself, or you are disrupted. Demonetization: The major assets in the industry will become free. Free music, free reading, free communication. Dematerialization: Removal of the original product |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment