| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 20 03:29PM -0700 Hello, More political philosophy about the European Union and about the world.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms.. I have just read the following about How Does the European Union Work, read it carefully: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/how-does-european-union-work As you notice that the European Union system is a more enhanced system, but there is still a weakness in the European Union system, and it is the weakness of Democracy, since , and first, Democracy must not accept "extremism" that hurts Democracy, and Democracy has to be proactive by educating efficiently the people so that for them to be apt at voting correctly and so that to be efficient(read below my thoughts about the education system and corruption): Notice that Even Russia is causing problems to European Union, read here to notice it: Russia's Involvement in Far-Right European Politics https://www.americansecurityproject.org/russias-involvement-in-far-right-european-politics/ And look at my following thoughts about the following problem with Democracy of USA(so as you notice again, it is about good education): So we have to be smartness so that to extract the rules, and we have to "agree" on the rules, so i will ask an easy question: Donald Trump has only an undergraduate Diploma, and it is not even a master degree Diploma, so how in the world one can accept it and not to follow the following efficient rule of: I think so that to be efficient governing, the intellect must be efficient too. How USA can become this stupidity ? Also China is causing problems to European Union(read about subsidizing the champions below, it is the same as the problem of monopoly that hurts competition and quality that i am talking about below in my thoughts about jews and capitalism), read my following thoughts to notice it: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more.. We have to be more smart, i think China is also reproducing the mistakes of Japan, because Japan has protected its large industrial conglomerates called in Japanese "Keiretsu" and Japan has compensated there disadvantages even if they were not at all good and efficient, and Japan didn't hesitate to give the Keiretsu all kinds of advantages and privileges even if they were not at all good and efficient, and this was not good for "competition" and Japan has "failed" by doing it. Look in this video carefully to notice it: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? - VisualPolitik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vou96yLuWXw I think this is the same that is happening with China, read the following: Competition: Europe's awakening in the face of foreign subsidies Our state aid rules are very strict: an EU company can only receive grants of up to € 200,000 over three years. In China, the three 5G operators received 19 million euros each through the megalopolis of Shenzhen (12 million inhabitants)… According to the Wall Street Journal (article of December 25, 2019), Huawei would have benefited from 75 billion state aid via different channels, figures denied by the company. State capitalism of China obviously raises the question of the inequity of world competition ... The direction the Commission is taking through the "white paper" is not this at all. The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this point: "What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices. " Read more here: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fpolitique%2Femmanuel-berretta%2Fconcurrence-le-reveil-de-l-europe-face-aux-subventions-etrangeres-18-06-2020-2380631_1897.php About the jews and about capitalism and more .. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms.. Look at this very interesting video about the jews and capitalism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXceS6pfupc You will notice that those jews in this video are primitive, since you will notice in the above video that those jews are not understanding local optimization of artificial intelligence(called exploitation) and global optimization of artificial intelligence(called exploration), i mean that they are for example neglecting the factor of nationalism(and nationalism of jews) , since i think that nationalism is too much competition that has the tendency to wanting to too much monopolize and it has the tendency to hurt competition and quality, so this is why the jews on the above video are using a primitive thinking that doesn't work correctly, this is why there must be laws against monopoly that hurts competition and that hurts quality. And read my following thoughts that are related to my above thoughts: More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism.. I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism, so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of the far-right political party in France: Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i think that this new model is better because it is more efficient , because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition. And read more all my following thoughts to understand better: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/BMjK8Sq5nIw And Read my following thoughts about productivity: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity And look at the following video, since i think that a good education system is the most important thing: Top 10 Countries with Best Education Systems in the World Read more here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xhfnjEf8C0 More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy.. I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written the following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012: ---- More about China and Russia and other such countries education system.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, read the following: "Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education is no exception," Mr. Li said. A Chinese Education, for a Price Read more here: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system, and i don't think it is meritocratic ! It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it: Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass examinations and obtain a diploma. RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities Read more here: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%20are. ---- And also i have just posted about the today China after the anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following: --- I invite you to read the following interesting article: China's Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/ --- So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt the education system and when education system is corrupt then the Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press, read my following thoughts to understand more: From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ? So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy, you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money. Now why to be Democracy ? I think that we have to be more smart and notice that Democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption (and corruption also means lack of efficiency), we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best. --- And read my following thoughts in the following links to understand better my thoughts: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/gjConWuxl24 And read also my following thoughts: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/R0NfDCtni00 And to know more about economy and capitalism, please read my following thoughts: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/wlJu5j1xhPk And read more of my thoughts of my political philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/8j-rboLzi38 More political philosophy about technopopulism.. I have just read the following from Christopher Bickerton a University Lecturer in Politics from University of Cambridge: "Democratic politics has undergone a profound transformation in recent decades. The structuring logic of political competition is no longer the ideological struggle between left and right. Political actors today compete in their appeals to 'the people' and to competence and expertise as supreme political virtues. The substance of contemporary democratic politics is these populist and technocratic claims, giving rise to a political field which we call technopopulism." Read more here: https://ces.fas.harvard.edu/events/2020/02/techno-populism-italy-spain Notice that he is saying the following: "The structuring logic of political competition is no longer the ideological struggle between left and right." I think he is not right since populism of today is about national "identity" and about the treat of globalization to national sovereignty, and it is pushed by the political right, read my following thoughts to notice it: More about our identity and about globalization and nationalism.. I have just read the following very interesting webpage: What's Wrong with Liberalism? https://www.historytoday.com/archive/feature/what%E2%80%99s-wrong-liberalism And he says the following: "Populism marks a new phase in identity politics for the simple reason that people fear not only poverty, but also identity deprivation." and: "Our gains have been gains in efficiency, transparency and utility; the gains that Bentham hoped to see by the construction of his Panopticon, in which a single guard would be able to look straight into every prison cell. Our losses have been losses in purpose and meaning." But i think that he is too pessimistic, but i am positive, because we have to know about the purpose and meaning of life, and we have to know more about our identity, since i think that we have to seek like a "balance" between competition and collaboration, and about the meaning and purpose of life, i am talking about it in my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality, read it carefully here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 Also here is what i just said about our identity and about globalization and nationalism: More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism.. I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism, so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of the far-right political party in France: Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 20 01:01PM -0700 Hello, About my PERT++ and about productivity.. I have just written the following: --- Yet more political philosophy about quality control and quality.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms.. So first you have to define quality(read below about it) and second you have to construct quality and third you have to control quality. So, I have just read the following about the Central Limit Theorem (I understood it), i invite you to read it carefully: https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter7/7_1_2_central_limit_theorem.php So as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is so important for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)): An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC) https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal --- So I have provided you in my PERT++ with the following functions: function NormalDistA (const Mean, StdDev, AVal, BVal: Extended): Single; function NormalDistP (const Mean, StdDev, AVal: Extended): Single; function InvNormalDist(const Mean, StdDev, PVal: Extended; const Less: Boolean): Extended; For NormalDistA() or NormalDistP(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the probability of the value Aval or the probability between the values of Aval and Bval. For InvNormalDist(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the length of the critical path of the probability PVal, and when Less is TRUE, you will obtain a cumulative distribution. So as you are noticing from my above thoughts that since PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So then you have to use my above functions that are Normal distribution and inverse normal distribution functions, please look at my demo inside my zip file to understand better how i am doing it: You can download and read about my PERT++ from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal And about productivity, read my following smart thoughts to understand: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity So as you are noticing i am saying: "Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger than the Serial productivity part, so productivity can scale much more (and it is like Gustafson's Law)." So as you are noticing that my answer about productivity is smart. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 20 12:26PM -0700 Hello, About Mathematics and Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D.. I have just read the following article about Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, i have just easily understood Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, so i invite you to read it carefully: https://www.alanzucconi.com/2018/05/02/ik-2d-1/ More political philosophy about mathematics and quality.. You have just seen me previously posting about mathematics, I think that mathematics also brings quality.. So i invite you to read my following thoughts to notice it: Yet more political philosophy about quality control and quality.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms.. So first you have to define quality(read below about it) and second you have to construct quality and third you have to control quality. So, I have just read the following about the Central Limit Theorem (I understood it), i invite you to read it carefully: https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter7/7_1_2_central_limit_theorem.php So as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is so important for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)): An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC) https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal More political philosophy of what is quality.. I have just read the following article about what is quality, i invite you to read it: https://www.cmc-global.org/content/why-quality-so-important-organization And notice that it says: "What is "Quality"? We can define the term "quality" in many ways, but the ISO family of standards gives a very concise definition: "quality - the degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfils requirements." (ISO 9000:2005 – 3.1.1)." So i think that this definition is also in accordance with my previous thoughts of my political philosophy, since notice that the requirements in the definition are both requirements by the people that use quality and requirements by the individual or group who bring quality, and notice that the requirements of the individual or group who bring quality have to adhere to the following, read my following thoughts to understand: More political philosophy about civilization.. So first you are noticing that we have to be Meritocracy, but Meritocracy has to define what is the right "value", is the right value only a useful utility ? so now you are understanding that if we define it by simply saying that it is a useful utility to people, so now we are not respecting the principles of Morality, since we have to make our civilization go forward towards more and more perfection, so this going forward towards more and more perfection sets the usefulness of the utility , so then it sets the value, so then you are noticing that Morality is like going forward towards more and more perfection and this process enhance the "quality" and the quality of the utility, so then it sets the value and it sets the usefulness of the utility, and i think this is part of the essence of a civilization. So read my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality here to notice it: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 More political philosophy about efficiency.. Today i will speak about the most important subject and it is: How to be efficient ? I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i will answer this question as follows: You have to be both good productivity and good quality. Now my answer is a high level abstraction, so i will go into the lower layers of abstraction: So, to be efficient productivity, here is what you have to do: Read my following smart thoughts to understand: https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity So as you are noticing i am saying: "Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger than the Serial productivity part, so productivity can scale much more (and it is like Gustafson's Law)." So as you are noticing that my answer about productivity is smart. And now how to be good in quality? You have to be smart(and use you fluid intelligence efficiently) and efficiently learn how to learn and efficiently learn. So as you are noticing that the constant factors in the human population are genetical, so the very important thing to notice is that to be good in quality you have to have a good education and an awareness, and of course you have, like in genetic algorithms, to know how to efficiently optimize locally(by exploitation) and globally(by exploration and diversification) so that to be optimal optimization. And of course there is individual efficiency and the group efficiency, but you have to be smart and notice that you have to know about the exponential progress and how to exponentially progress, so read my following thoughts to understand about it: Here is the 6 D's of Exponential Growth: Digitalization: Once something goes from physical to digital, it gains the ability to grow exponentially. Deception: Initial exponential growth is such small increases (.01 to .02) that it goes largely unnoticed. Disruption: Either a new market is created, or an old one is overturned. You either disrupt yourself, or you are disrupted. Demonetization: The major assets in the industry will become free. Free music, free reading, free communication. Dematerialization: Removal of the original product entirely, lumping alarm clocks, cameras, notebooks, and phones into one smartphone. Democratization: The costs drop so low that the technology becomes available to everyone. Read more here: The 6 Ds of Tech Disruption: A Guide to the Digital Economy https://singularityhub.com/2016/11/22/the-6-ds-of-tech-disruption-a-guide-to-the-digital-economy/?fbclid=IwAR1Jx4VJYvIce-BJXeVcajBYjwdKvvP_2y4WOd-2DEtGvXnOye0yzkQVdQU&utm_content=bufferb9891&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook-hub&utm_campaign=buffer Also capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth Read more here: http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth And read the following: Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ But as you have just noticed that it is also related to my following thoughts: The future of innovation is in software I keep reading about how the future will be shaped by new cheaper fuel or amazing new medications. I believe that we are misreading the trends. Yes, we will have better medications and cheaper fuel in the future. However, I believe we are clearly in the mist of an information revolution. The future will be shaped by software, defined broadly. Specifically, I believe that: Tele-work, tele-play, tele-learning will soon represent 80% of our lives. There is much more room for innovation in software than in hardware. There are few ways to build a house, but many more ways to build a virtual house. Read more here: https://lemire.me/blog/2008/10/27/the-future-of-innovation-is-in-software/ And this related to my following thoughts: Dematerialising the future: what role can technology and consumers play? I have just posted before about Dematerialization Through Services, read it here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.usa/rVZUcghUe5E The above makes it clear that the evidence indicates that 'dematerialization through services' is not a valid policy for reducing carbon emissions. But Dematerialising is still important, read the following to notice it: Dematerialising the future: what role can technology and consumers play? https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/dematerialising-future-technology-consumers Also read my following thoughts to notice: About capitalism and the positive correlation between economic growth and environmental performance.. As an economy expands, resource usage becomes increasingly efficient and economies tend to move away from ecologically harmful behavior, while raising the standard of living of its participants. In fact, the 2018 Yale Environmental Performance Index shows a clear positive correlation between economic growth and environmental performance, read about it here: https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/2018/report/category/hlt So i think that we are on the right path, so as you are noticing that we have to dematerialize much more so that to avoid Environmental problems, but how will look like our near future that will be much more dematerialized ? look here in the following video to notice that one of our fellow techlead and software developer is doing it by much more dematerializing his life and he is happy by doing it: My minimalist apartment (as a millionaire) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUeqHhbQWFc More political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui.. I am a white arab from Morocco that is living in Canada since year 1989 and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and now i will do more political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, here it is: https://tasteofmaroc.com/moroccan-couscous-with-seven-vegetables/ So as you are noticing you have to be smart, so when you look at this beautiful Moroccan couscous, there is different levels of abstraction, since you can simply look at it and remember and say that it is a beautiful Moroccan couscous, or you can be more smart and look at it from a different perspective and from a different level of abstraction and say that this beautiful Moroccan couscous requires Spices that give it the good taste, and when you are smart you will immediately make a logical analogy with political philosophy by saying that those Spices of this beautiful Moroccan couscous make, from the imperfection of a not so good taste, a perfection of a good taste, so you will say that it is the same for humans, since arabs and indians and south americans and such other ethnical groups can also use Spices in a form of good education and awareness so that to reduce by much there imperfections that give them a not so good taste , so that to be accepted by others, and now you are understanding that it is a good philosophy that calls for proactivity that wants people to have a good education and an awareness, and this is related to my following thoughts on hate, so read them carefully: You have to understand political philosophy, i think political philosophy must be "constructive", but what do i mean by constructive ? you will quickly notice that humans have human imperfections, but when you look at those human imperfection you can start to hate humans and hate our humanity, but this is not the good political philosophy, because you have to distinguish between two things: First, you can look at those human imperfections and hate humans and hate our humanity and then degenerate towards a much more violent system, second, you can look at those human imperfections and say that we have to transcend those human imperfections by being efficiently educated and by being efficiently organized globally and locally and by being efficiently trained and by being efficiently aware and conscious, so what will you choose ? so i think you are quickly understanding that Democracy has to be "proactive" by efficiently educating and by efficiently organizing globally and locally and by efficiently training and by efficiently making aware and conscious so that Democracy works correctly and so that we can transcend our human imperfections, so then i think that you are quickly noticing that it is the way that i am choosing so that to transcend our human imperfections, this is why you have noticed that i said previously the following: --- I am noticing that people here are quick at hating, notice that the white supremacist of soc.culture.china newsgroup called Byker is hating Chinese people and is hating other people around the world etc. and notice that people are quick at hating people because of there human imperfections, but i think that this is not wise because you can easily hate people and hate our world and hate our humanity, but when you are smart you will notice that you have not to fall into this trap of hating and hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity, because the best way is to be "constructive" and make people educated and aware and efficient so that we reduce much more there imperfections and so that we accept them and so that we don't fall into the trap of hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity. This is why i am talking as i am talking political philosophy. --- More political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, here it is: https://tasteofmaroc.com/moroccan-couscous-with-seven-vegetables/ First i said the following about fluid intelligence: --- Here is my definition of "pattern", since i am using it below in my thoughts of my political philosophy: A pattern is a discernible coherent system based on the intended interrelationship of component parts. So you are understanding that fluid intelligence from genetics has to discern this coherent system and also extract the rule, it is also how we are extracting a theorem in mathematics, it is how works fluid intelligence from genetics. --- So as you are noticing i am using my fluid intelligence so that to make you understand my way of thinking, so notice from my definition above of what is a pattern, that fluid intelligence that is capable of discerning a more difficult pattern or coherent system is what we call smartness, so notice how in my above thoughts i have with my fluid intelligence descerned an important pattern or an important coherent system in the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, also i have with my fluid intelligence discerned another important pattern or coherent system in Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, and here it is: When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient philosophy. And it is also my spirit. But you have to be "smart" to understand my example above, the double satisfaction is also the intellectual or cultural satisfaction and the material satisfaction, |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment