| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 02 06:34PM -0800 Hello.. More of my philosophy about logical consistency and consistency.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. So i will do more philosophy in front of your eyes, and i am thinking and writing "rapidly" all my philosophy(including my philosophy in my below writing), so as you are noticing that thinking and writing as i am doing it needs "precision" and it needs smartness, so i will make you understand more what i mean by my answer below of the question: What is a consistent system?, so notice that in mathematical logic, when there is a logical contradiction, it means that the system is not logically consistent and that means that the system is not consistent, but you have to make an important difference, it is that in mathematical logic there is a more sophisticated meaning and a less sophisticated meaning, so for example look at the following theorem: If (A imply B) And If (B imply C) Then (A imply C) So as you are noticing that the whole theorem has a more sophisticated meaning than its parts, and now suppose that there is a logical contradiction in the theorem, you will notice that it will give a "bug" to the whole meaning of the theorem, so the theorem will become a low level sophistication of meaning that comes from a logical inconsistency that is a logical contradiction, so can we ask a philosophical question of: is this logical contradiction that causes an inconsistency in the system causes that the meaning of the system becomes not understandable? i will answer yes, because there is like two modes to measure consistency of a system, there is the logical mode to measure consistency of a system, and there are other modes with wich we measure consistency a system, so if we measure consistency of the system or theorem with the logical mode, we say that the contradiction is not logical, and that means that the understandable is both the understandable of the logical mode and the understandable of the other modes, so when there is a logical contradiction in the system or in the theorem, we say that in the understandable of logical mode the contradiction is not logical and that also means that there is a missing part in the logical meaning that gives a meaning that permits the system or the theorem to be of value or sophisticated meaning, and this missing meaning of the logical contradiction is the not understandable of the logical mode that is also the not understandable, since when there is contradiction the whole system or theorem fall down and fail and in logic it is like a null set, and this fall down and failing in the meaning is like the null set of meaning , and this null set of meaning is also what we call the theorem or the system is not understood as a whole, so i think my logical proof is successful and it is true for the cases of the system that follows an infinite set of rules etc. (read about them below) Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand: More of my philosophy about what is consistency of a system.. Now i will talk about what is consistency of a system.. Notice how i have just logically proved(read below) that a system is not always consistent, but there remain a very important question in philosophy and it is: What is a consistent system? i think i am smart, and i say that a consistent system is the one that can be understood as a whole as one system with smartness, so if there is logical inconsistency in the system, so this logical inconsistency will make it as not like one system that can be understood as one system, also if the set of rules that follows the system are infinite, since a set can be finite or infinite, so the system can not be understood as one system, so it is inconsistent, and if it is a chaotic system, so the chaotic system can follow finite rules and it can be understood as a whole, so it becomes consistent, or it can follows infinite rules, so it becomes inconsistent. More of my philosophy about a system and consistency.. So i will ask the following philosophical question: Is in philosophy a system always consistent ? Here is my answer: So read the following definition in the dictionary of "system": https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/system So as you notice that the dictionary says the following: "A system is a way of working, organizing, or doing something which follows a fixed plan or set of rules." And look at the definition of plan in the dictionary: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/plan So as you notice that it says: "A plan is a method of achieving something that you have worked out in detail beforehand" So we can logically infer that a system follows a fixed plan or set of rules, and we know that "consistent" means acting or done in the same way over time, and the "same way" over time is "finite" over time, so then since a system follows a set of rules, the "set" of those rules can be infinite, since a set can be finite or infinite, so then we can logically say that since a system also follows an infinite set of rules , so that means that a system has as nature or essence that it is both an unchanging nature that follows a fixed plan and an inconsistency, so i think we can logically infer that a system is not always consistent. I think that fluid intelligence discerns patterns(and discern is to recognize, it also means to know), and a pattern is a system that is static or dynamic that can be considered coherent(that means consistent or logical), because it follows a fixed plan or set of rules or a way, and i think that when i say in the definition that the pattern follows a fixed plan or set of rules or a way, it can also abstract all the functionality of fluid intelligence, read my following thoughts to understand: More philosophy about fluid intelligence and a pattern.. Here is the definition in the dictionary of pattern: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/pattern And here is the definition in the dictionary of system: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/system So as you are noticing that the definition of "pattern" is: "A particular way in which something is done, is organized, or happens" And the definition of "system" is: "A system is a way of working, organizing, or doing something which follows a fixed plan or set of rules." So as you are noticing that a pattern also means a system, and the pattern or system can be considered coherent(that means consistent or logical), because it follows a fixed plan or set of rules or a way. So in a Mensa IQ test you have to discern the coherent pattern or complex pattern with your fluid intelligence. More philosophy about what is a pattern and more.. I think i am a philosopher, so i will ask a question of what is a pattern? I think a pattern is system that can be dynamic or static, i give you an example so that you understand: If i say the following sentence: My name is Amine Moulay Ramdane and i am a genius. There is high level patterns and lower level patterns in this sentence, i think the word "My" and the other words are lower level patterns or systems in the sentence and the composition of the sentence from words is a higher level pattern or system that is composed from lower level patterns of words. This is how works fluid intelligence of smartness, it finds higher level patterns and lower level patterns of our universe constituted with low level patterns called matter or energy. More of my philosophy about happiness.. When you read my below writing you will notice that i am saying that happiness comes from pleasures of life and from like the mechanism of the alternance of the day and night and i am explaining the mechanism so that you understand it. But the question is: Am i really smart to say the above? since as you are noticing that i am saying that "happiness comes from", but i am not saying that "happiness also comes from", so as you are noticing it is like i am saying "happiness only comes from", so is it illogical to say so ? No, it is logical to say so , since i am also saying below in my political philosophy(when i am speaking about the Japanese lifestyle) that order can be considered a pleasure of life, so then it is logical to say in my above writing that "happiness only comes from", since notice in the above context that order is a "constraint" , so then we have to know how to define order, so then you can read my below philosophy and notice that order is constrained by morality that i am showing that it must be progressive, read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that you notice: More of my philosophy about what is the Nature of Personal Identity.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I invite you to look at the following short video: Raymond Kurzweil - What is the Nature of Personal Identity? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pb3zsuHwqvY&t=193s I think that Raymond Kurzweil in the above video is not answering correctly. So i think that it is a philosophical question of: What is the Nature of Personal Identity? So i think i am smart and i will answer it like the following: I think that you have to understand my philosophy about morality, here it is: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So as you are noticing that in my philosophy about morality i am proving that morality is perfection at best , and the "at best" is here in the definition of morality to make it a correct abstraction, and note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection So as you are noticing since morality is also perfection, so our identity or personal identity is also this perfection, since we can say that we are a civilization and this civilization is a dynamic process and it is the act or process of perfecting at best, so then you have to know how to be correct science and correct technology that brings perfection. And to be able to know more about my philosophy about existence, I have just created a webpage on my website here about my philosophy about human existence, you can read it carefully here: https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence About philosophy and Metaphilosophy.. I think i am smart, and i am doing philosophy, but you have to understand my way of doing philosophy, my way of doing philosophy is not what we call doing Brainstorming first and so forth, but i am most of the time like first finding the smart architectural ideas with my fluid intelligence, and it needs more smartness, so from those smart architectural ideas i am constructing more and more my philosophy, and you have to understand my philosophical smartness, since a very important thing for me, is also finding the soft power engines that permit people to efficiently go forward towards more and more perfection and that permit people to be smart, for example when you are genetically a person that greatly wants to show people that he is smart even if he is not smart, this genetically wanting greatly to show people that you are smart even if you are not smart is what we call an "engine" that permits to go forward towards more and more perfection, so in philosophy one of the most important thing is to find the mechanisms that play the role of "engines" that permit people to go efficiently forward towards more and more perfection and that permit people to become efficiently smart, this is one of the most important thing in philosophy, but not only that, but the goal of philosophy is happiness, but notice that it is the "goal", so the question in philosophy is how to efficiently attain the goal that is happiness, so an important question in philosophy is how to know how to be happiness, because if you say that happiness is only being pleasures of life, that's not the correct philosophy, so this is why i have to be inventive, and this is why you have seen me explaining what is happiness in my philosophy below, read it carefully and you will notice that i am answering this question by giving an answer in a form of a mechanism that plays the role of an "engine" that permits people to go efficiently forward toward more and more perfection and that permit people to be a smart, so as you are noticing that i have to be smart when i am inventing my thoughts of my philosophy. Here is my philosophy about happiness and notice how i am like creating the engine that permits to go efficiently forward towards more and more perfection: Is human life sad ? I think i am a philosopher and i will answer this question: When you are smart you will know that morality needs the right "balance", like a balance between competition and collaboration, or like a balance between individualism and collectivism, so human life is the same, it needs requirements so that to be pleasure of life, for example human life needs the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty and that brings pleasure, so i think human life has this kind of alternances that brings happiness and pleasures as an essence, for example when this Coronavirus crisis will be over, we will have learned how to appreciate much more our kind of civilization or pleasures of life, so the sadness of Coronavirus crisis will soon bring happiness and pleasures of life when Coronavirus crisis will be over, so as you are noticing it is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty and pleasure. Now do we have to measure it absolutely or relatively ? This is an important question in philosophy: So how do we have to measure happiness ? and is happiness real ? So i think that the philosopher Albert Camus was not smart when he said that human existence is absurd, by saying the following: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe's refusal to provide that." So what is the right way to measure it ? I think it is like science, since we are not yet perfect, so i think it is "hypothetical" to say that life is absurd like was saying the philosopher Albert Camus, because we have to to be pragmatic in science and measure it taking into account our "imperfections" and "limitations", so the are we happy must be measured in a pragmatic way, so then you can notice that my philosophy is more pragmatic, since it is explaining that happiness comes not only from pleasures of life, but it also comes from the alternance of being "hungry" for taking a rest and taking a rest or from the alternance of being hungry and eating a delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that make us more hungry for(and this gives a much greater intensity to pleasures of life, and this makes you much more happy) or make us appreciate much more the pleasures of life, so they make us more happy, and i think this is the secret of life, so then life is not absurd, since the meaning of life is that we are getting happiness from this kind of mechanism that looks like the alternance of the day and night from where comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so then we have to be careful by being selective of the kind of pleasures of life that make us happy so that for example to not be too much materialism that causes problems. From where comes happiness and pleasures of life? It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that for example you will get |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 02 04:42PM -0800 Hello.. More of my philosophy about what is consistency of a system.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I now i will talk about what is consistency of a system.. Notice how i have just logically proved(read below) that a system is not always consistent, but there remain a very important question in philosophy and it is: What is a consistent system? i think i am smart, and i say that a consistent system is the one that can be understood as a whole as one system with smartness, so if there is logical inconsistency in the system, so this logical inconsistency will make it as not like one system that can be understood as one system, also if the set of rules that follows the system are infinite, since a set can be finite or infinite, so the system can not be understood as one system, so it is inconsistent, and if it is a chaotic system, so the chaotic system can follow finite rules and it can be understand, so it becomes consistent, or it can follows infinite rules, so it becomes inconsistent. More of my philosophy about a system and consistency.. So i will ask the following philosophical question: Is in philosophy a system always consistent ? Here is my answer: So read the following definition in the dictionary of "system": https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/system So as you notice that the dictionary says the following: "A system is a way of working, organizing, or doing something which follows a fixed plan or set of rules." And look at the definition of plan in the dictionary: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/plan So as you notice that it says: "A plan is a method of achieving something that you have worked out in detail beforehand" So we can logically infer that a system follows a fixed plan or set of rules, and we know that "consistent" means acting or done in the same way over time, and the "same way" over time is "finite" over time, so then since a system follows a set of rules, the "set" of those rules can be infinite, since a set can be finite or infinite, so then we can logically say that since a system also follows an infinite set of rules , so that means that a system has as nature or essence that it is both an unchanging nature that follows a fixed plan and an inconsistency, so i think we can logically infer that a system is not always consistent. I think that fluid intelligence discerns patterns(and discern is to recognize, it also means to know), and a pattern is a system that is static or dynamic that can be considered coherent(that means consistent or logical), because it follows a fixed plan or set of rules or a way, and i think that when i say in the definition that the pattern follows a fixed plan or set of rules or a way, it can also abstract all the functionality of fluid intelligence, read my following thoughts to understand: More philosophy about fluid intelligence and a pattern.. Here is the definition in the dictionary of pattern: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/pattern And here is the definition in the dictionary of system: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/system So as you are noticing that the definition of "pattern" is: "A particular way in which something is done, is organized, or happens" And the definition of "system" is: "A system is a way of working, organizing, or doing something which follows a fixed plan or set of rules." So as you are noticing that a pattern also means a system, and the pattern or system can be considered coherent(that means consistent or logical), because it follows a fixed plan or set of rules or a way. So in a Mensa IQ test you have to discern the coherent pattern or complex pattern with your fluid intelligence. More philosophy about what is a pattern and more.. I think i am a philosopher, so i will ask a question of what is a pattern? I think a pattern is system that can be dynamic or static, i give you an example so that you understand: If i say the following sentence: My name is Amine Moulay Ramdane and i am a genius. There is high level patterns and lower level patterns in this sentence, i think the word "My" and the other words are lower level patterns or systems in the sentence and the composition of the sentence from words is a higher level pattern or system that is composed from lower level patterns of words. This is how works fluid intelligence of smartness, it finds higher level patterns and lower level patterns of our universe constituted with low level patterns called matter or energy. More of my philosophy about happiness.. When you read my below writing you will notice that i am saying that happiness comes from pleasures of life and from like the mechanism of the alternance of the day and night and i am explaining the mechanism so that you understand it. But the question is: Am i really smart to say the above? since as you are noticing that i am saying that "happiness comes from", but i am not saying that "happiness also comes from", so as you are noticing it is like i am saying "happiness only comes from", so is it illogical to say so ? No, it is logical to say so , since i am also saying below in my political philosophy(when i am speaking about the Japanese lifestyle) that order can be considered a pleasure of life, so then it is logical to say in my above writing that "happiness only comes from", since notice in the above context that order is a "constraint" , so then we have to know how to define order, so then you can read my below philosophy and notice that order is constrained by morality that i am showing that it must be progressive, read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that you notice: More of my philosophy about what is the Nature of Personal Identity.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I invite you to look at the following short video: Raymond Kurzweil - What is the Nature of Personal Identity? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pb3zsuHwqvY&t=193s I think that Raymond Kurzweil in the above video is not answering correctly. So i think that it is a philosophical question of: What is the Nature of Personal Identity? So i think i am smart and i will answer it like the following: I think that you have to understand my philosophy about morality, here it is: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So as you are noticing that in my philosophy about morality i am proving that morality is perfection at best , and the "at best" is here in the definition of morality to make it a correct abstraction, and note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection So as you are noticing since morality is also perfection, so our identity or personal identity is also this perfection, since we can say that we are a civilization and this civilization is a dynamic process and it is the act or process of perfecting at best, so then you have to know how to be correct science and correct technology that brings perfection. And to be able to know more about my philosophy about existence, I have just created a webpage on my website here about my philosophy about human existence, you can read it carefully here: https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence About philosophy and Metaphilosophy.. I think i am smart, and i am doing philosophy, but you have to understand my way of doing philosophy, my way of doing philosophy is not what we call doing Brainstorming first and so forth, but i am most of the time like first finding the smart architectural ideas with my fluid intelligence, and it needs more smartness, so from those smart architectural ideas i am constructing more and more my philosophy, and you have to understand my philosophical smartness, since a very important thing for me, is also finding the soft power engines that permit people to efficiently go forward towards more and more perfection and that permit people to be smart, for example when you are genetically a person that greatly wants to show people that he is smart even if he is not smart, this genetically wanting greatly to show people that you are smart even if you are not smart is what we call an "engine" that permits to go forward towards more and more perfection, so in philosophy one of the most important thing is to find the mechanisms that play the role of "engines" that permit people to go efficiently forward towards more and more perfection and that permit people to become efficiently smart, this is one of the most important thing in philosophy, but not only that, but the goal of philosophy is happiness, but notice that it is the "goal", so the question in philosophy is how to efficiently attain the goal that is happiness, so an important question in philosophy is how to know how to be happiness, because if you say that happiness is only being pleasures of life, that's not the correct philosophy, so this is why i have to be inventive, and this is why you have seen me explaining what is happiness in my philosophy below, read it carefully and you will notice that i am answering this question by giving an answer in a form of a mechanism that plays the role of an "engine" that permits people to go efficiently forward toward more and more perfection and that permit people to be a smart, so as you are noticing that i have to be smart when i am inventing my thoughts of my philosophy. Here is my philosophy about happiness and notice how i am like creating the engine that permits to go efficiently forward towards more and more perfection: Is human life sad ? I think i am a philosopher and i will answer this question: When you are smart you will know that morality needs the right "balance", like a balance between competition and collaboration, or like a balance between individualism and collectivism, so human life is the same, it needs requirements so that to be pleasure of life, for example human life needs the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty and that brings pleasure, so i think human life has this kind of alternances that brings happiness and pleasures as an essence, for example when this Coronavirus crisis will be over, we will have learned how to appreciate much more our kind of civilization or pleasures of life, so the sadness of Coronavirus crisis will soon bring happiness and pleasures of life when Coronavirus crisis will be over, so as you are noticing it is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty and pleasure. Now do we have to measure it absolutely or relatively ? This is an important question in philosophy: So how do we have to measure happiness ? and is happiness real ? So i think that the philosopher Albert Camus was not smart when he said that human existence is absurd, by saying the following: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe's refusal to provide that." So what is the right way to measure it ? I think it is like science, since we are not yet perfect, so i think it is "hypothetical" to say that life is absurd like was saying the philosopher Albert Camus, because we have to to be pragmatic in science and measure it taking into account our "imperfections" and "limitations", so the are we happy must be measured in a pragmatic way, so then you can notice that my philosophy is more pragmatic, since it is explaining that happiness comes not only from pleasures of life, but it also comes from the alternance of being "hungry" for taking a rest and taking a rest or from the alternance of being hungry and eating a delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that make us more hungry for(and this gives a much greater intensity to pleasures of life, and this makes you much more happy) or make us appreciate much more the pleasures of life, so they make us more happy, and i think this is the secret of life, so then life is not absurd, since the meaning of life is that we are getting happiness from this kind of mechanism that looks like the alternance of the day and night from where comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so then we have to be careful by being selective of the kind of pleasures of life that make us happy so that for example to not be too much materialism that causes problems. From where comes happiness and pleasures of life? It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give yourself peace by taking a rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from where comes the meaning of human existence. More philosophy about do we have to measure it relatively or absolutely.. When you measure an IQ , you can measure it relatively to the distribution of other IQs, but is it the right measure? so this question is really important, since the philosopher Albert Camus was measuring the meaning and purpose of life by measuring it like absolutely by saying that human existence is absurd by saying: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe's refusal to provide that." But i think this is a mistake, since in my philosophy i am measuring the meaning of human existence "relatively" to pleasures of life that are like "powerful" drugs that bring us more happiness and so they give meaning to human existence(since they are like powerful drugs) and they permit us to go forward towards more and more perfection and this going forward towards more and more perfection is also the goal of morality(read below my political philosophy about morality so that to understand it), so i think i am right by saying so, so then human existence is not absurd. More philosophy about the secret of life.. I think i am a wise man, and i think that life has like a secret, and it is that it needs darkness and lightness but this both darkness and lightness is happiness, since darkness of life also become an insight that helps us, and also darkness of life is as a level of suffering that allows us to appreciate simple pleasures of life or pleasures of life, and this mechanism of life that is a level of suffering that allows us to appreciate simple pleasures of life also allows us to be happy, so when you are a wise man you will notice that life is like a mechanism that is smart, since life is like Swarm intelligence that brings the best. So we have to be optimistic. More of my philosophy about fluid intelligence and about consciousness.. More of my philosophy about is also our brain like a deep learning network that not only finds or see the pattern but it also gives the meaning of the pattern that is a dynamic or static system? i think that consciousness is the |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 02 03:09PM -0800 Hello.. More of my philosophy about a system and consistency.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. So i will ask the following philosophical question: Is in philosophy a system always consistent ? Here is my answer: So read the following definition in the dictionary of "system": https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/system So as you notice that the dictionary says the following: "A system is a way of working, organizing, or doing something which follows a fixed plan or set of rules." And look at the definition of plan in the dictionary: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/plan So as you notice that it says: "A plan is a method of achieving something that you have worked out in detail beforehand" So we can logically infer that a system follows a fixed plan or set of rules, and we know that "consistent" means acting or done in the same way over time, and the "same way" over time is "finite" over time, so then since a system follows a set of rules, the "set" of those rules can be infinite, since a set can be finite or infinite, so then we can logically say that since a system also follows an infinite set of rules , so that means that a system has as nature or essence that it is both an unchanging nature that follows a fixed plan and an inconsistency, so i think we can logically infer that a system is not always consistent. I think that fluid intelligence discerns patterns(and discern is to recognize, it also means to know), and a pattern is a system that is static or dynamic that can be considered coherent(that means consistent or logical), because it follows a fixed plan or set of rules or a way, and i think that when i say in the definition that the pattern follows a fixed plan or set of rules or a way, it can also abstract all the functionality of fluid intelligence, read my following thoughts to understand: More philosophy about fluid intelligence and a pattern.. Here is the definition in the dictionary of pattern: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/pattern And here is the definition in the dictionary of system: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/system So as you are noticing that the definition of "pattern" is: "A particular way in which something is done, is organized, or happens" And the definition of "system" is: "A system is a way of working, organizing, or doing something which follows a fixed plan or set of rules." So as you are noticing that a pattern also means a system, and the pattern or system can be considered coherent(that means consistent or logical), because it follows a fixed plan or set of rules or a way. So in a Mensa IQ test you have to discern the coherent pattern or complex pattern with your fluid intelligence. More philosophy about what is a pattern and more.. I think i am a philosopher, so i will ask a question of what is a pattern? I think a pattern is system that can be dynamic or static, i give you an example so that you understand: If i say the following sentence: My name is Amine Moulay Ramdane and i am a genius. There is high level patterns and lower level patterns in this sentence, i think the word "My" and the other words are lower level patterns or systems in the sentence and the composition of the sentence from words is a higher level pattern or system that is composed from lower level patterns of words. This is how works fluid intelligence of smartness, it finds higher level patterns and lower level patterns of our universe constituted with low level patterns called matter or energy. More of my philosophy about happiness.. When you read my below writing you will notice that i am saying that happiness comes from pleasures of life and from like the mechanism of the alternance of the day and night and i am explaining the mechanism so that you understand it. But the question is: Am i really smart to say the above? since as you are noticing that i am saying that "happiness comes from", but i am not saying that "happiness also comes from", so as you are noticing it is like i am saying "happiness only comes from", so is it illogical to say so ? No, it is logical to say so , since i am also saying below in my political philosophy(when i am speaking about the Japanese lifestyle) that order can be considered a pleasure of life, so then it is logical to say in my above writing that "happiness only comes from", since notice in the above context that order is a "constraint" , so then we have to know how to define order, so then you can read my below philosophy and notice that order is constrained by morality that i am showing that it must be progressive, read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that you notice: More of my philosophy about what is the Nature of Personal Identity.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I invite you to look at the following short video: Raymond Kurzweil - What is the Nature of Personal Identity? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pb3zsuHwqvY&t=193s I think that Raymond Kurzweil in the above video is not answering correctly. So i think that it is a philosophical question of: What is the Nature of Personal Identity? So i think i am smart and i will answer it like the following: I think that you have to understand my philosophy about morality, here it is: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So as you are noticing that in my philosophy about morality i am proving that morality is perfection at best , and the "at best" is here in the definition of morality to make it a correct abstraction, and note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection So as you are noticing since morality is also perfection, so our identity or personal identity is also this perfection, since we can say that we are a civilization and this civilization is a dynamic process and it is the act or process of perfecting at best, so then you have to know how to be correct science and correct technology that brings perfection. And to be able to know more about my philosophy about existence, I have just created a webpage on my website here about my philosophy about human existence, you can read it carefully here: https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence About philosophy and Metaphilosophy.. I think i am smart, and i am doing philosophy, but you have to understand my way of doing philosophy, my way of doing philosophy is not what we call doing Brainstorming first and so forth, but i am most of the time like first finding the smart architectural ideas with my fluid intelligence, and it needs more smartness, so from those smart architectural ideas i am constructing more and more my philosophy, and you have to understand my philosophical smartness, since a very important thing for me, is also finding the soft power engines that permit people to efficiently go forward towards more and more perfection and that permit people to be smart, for example when you are genetically a person that greatly wants to show people that he is smart even if he is not smart, this genetically wanting greatly to show people that you are smart even if you are not smart is what we call an "engine" that permits to go forward towards more and more perfection, so in philosophy one of the most important thing is to find the mechanisms that play the role of "engines" that permit people to go efficiently forward towards more and more perfection and that permit people to become efficiently smart, this is one of the most important thing in philosophy, but not only that, but the goal of philosophy is happiness, but notice that it is the "goal", so the question in philosophy is how to efficiently attain the goal that is happiness, so an important question in philosophy is how to know how to be happiness, because if you say that happiness is only being pleasures of life, that's not the correct philosophy, so this is why i have to be inventive, and this is why you have seen me explaining what is happiness in my philosophy below, read it carefully and you will notice that i am answering this question by giving an answer in a form of a mechanism that plays the role of an "engine" that permits people to go efficiently forward toward more and more perfection and that permit people to be a smart, so as you are noticing that i have to be smart when i am inventing my thoughts of my philosophy. Here is my philosophy about happiness and notice how i am like creating the engine that permits to go efficiently forward towards more and more perfection: Is human life sad ? I think i am a philosopher and i will answer this question: When you are smart you will know that morality needs the right "balance", like a balance between competition and collaboration, or like a balance between individualism and collectivism, so human life is the same, it needs requirements so that to be pleasure of life, for example human life needs the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty and that brings pleasure, so i think human life has this kind of alternances that brings happiness and pleasures as an essence, for example when this Coronavirus crisis will be over, we will have learned how to appreciate much more our kind of civilization or pleasures of life, so the sadness of Coronavirus crisis will soon bring happiness and pleasures of life when Coronavirus crisis will be over, so as you are noticing it is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty and pleasure. Now do we have to measure it absolutely or relatively ? This is an important question in philosophy: So how do we have to measure happiness ? and is happiness real ? So i think that the philosopher Albert Camus was not smart when he said that human existence is absurd, by saying the following: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe's refusal to provide that." So what is the right way to measure it ? I think it is like science, since we are not yet perfect, so i think it is "hypothetical" to say that life is absurd like was saying the philosopher Albert Camus, because we have to to be pragmatic in science and measure it taking into account our "imperfections" and "limitations", so the are we happy must be measured in a pragmatic way, so then you can notice that my philosophy is more pragmatic, since it is explaining that happiness comes not only from pleasures of life, but it also comes from the alternance of being "hungry" for taking a rest and taking a rest or from the alternance of being hungry and eating a delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that make us more hungry for(and this gives a much greater intensity to pleasures of life, and this makes you much more happy) or make us appreciate much more the pleasures of life, so they make us more happy, and i think this is the secret of life, so then life is not absurd, since the meaning of life is that we are getting happiness from this kind of mechanism that looks like the alternance of the day and night from where comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so then we have to be careful by being selective of the kind of pleasures of life that make us happy so that for example to not be too much materialism that causes problems. From where comes happiness and pleasures of life? It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give yourself peace by taking a rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from where comes the meaning of human existence. More philosophy about do we have to measure it relatively or absolutely.. When you measure an IQ , you can measure it relatively to the distribution of other IQs, but is it the right measure? so this question is really important, since the philosopher Albert Camus was measuring the meaning and purpose of life by measuring it like absolutely by saying that human existence is absurd by saying: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe's refusal to provide that." But i think this is a mistake, since in my philosophy i am measuring the meaning of human existence "relatively" to pleasures of life that are like "powerful" drugs that bring us more happiness and so they give meaning to human existence(since they are like powerful drugs) and they permit us to go forward towards more and more perfection and this going forward towards more and more perfection is also the goal of morality(read below my political philosophy about morality so that to understand it), so i think i am right by saying so, so then human existence is not absurd. More philosophy about the secret of life.. I think i am a wise man, and i think that life has like a secret, and it is that it needs darkness and lightness but this both darkness and lightness is happiness, since darkness of life also become an insight that helps us, and also darkness of life is as a level of suffering that allows us to appreciate simple pleasures of life or pleasures of life, and this mechanism of life that is a level of suffering that allows us to appreciate simple pleasures of life also allows us to be happy, so when you are a wise man you will notice that life is like a mechanism that is smart, since life is like Swarm intelligence that brings the best. So we have to be optimistic. More of my philosophy about fluid intelligence and about consciousness.. More of my philosophy about is also our brain like a deep learning network that not only finds or see the pattern but it also gives the meaning of the pattern that is a dynamic or static system? i think that consciousness is the Value-added of processing with meanings that comes from like the feeling of our senses like the senses of touch etc. and it gives life and it permits to give happiness since our senses permit to feel pleasures of life, and this happiness permit to give meaning to human existence, so in my next posts i will explain much more deeply what is consciousness and what is fluid intelligence. This is why i just said the following: I think i am smart, and i think what gives what we call life to human has as an essence in what we call feelings, and i think that self-awareness is like a sense of touch or feeling of our own thoughts, and self-awareness is like we are constantly like feeling or touching our own thoughts, and i think this feeling is biologic, and i think that human consciousness is like the acts of feeling or touching, and it comes from our senses that are biologic, so we are feeling pleasures of life, and this gives happiness and meaning to human |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 02 01:15PM -0800 Hello.. More of my philosophy about what is fluid intelligence.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think that fluid intelligence discerns patterns(and discern is to recognize, it also means to know), and a pattern is a system that is static or dynamic that can be considered coherent(that means consistent or logical), because it follows a fixed plan or set of rules or a way, and i think that when i say in the definition that the pattern follows a fixed plan or set of rules or a way, it can also abstract all the functionality of fluid intelligence, read my following thoughts to understand: More philosophy about fluid intelligence and a pattern.. Here is the definition in the dictionary of pattern: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/pattern And here is the definition in the dictionary of system: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/system So as you are noticing that the definition of "pattern" is: "A particular way in which something is done, is organized, or happens" And the definition of "system" is: "A system is a way of working, organizing, or doing something which follows a fixed plan or set of rules." So as you are noticing that a pattern also means a system, and the pattern or system can be considered coherent(that means consistent or logical), because it follows a fixed plan or set of rules or a way. So in a Mensa IQ test you have to discern the coherent pattern or complex pattern with your fluid intelligence. More philosophy about what is a pattern and more.. I think i am a philosopher, so i will ask a question of what is a pattern? I think a pattern is system that can be dynamic or static, i give you an example so that you understand: If i say the following sentence: My name is Amine Moulay Ramdane and i am a genius. There is high level patterns and lower level patterns in this sentence, i think the word "My" and the other words are lower level patterns or systems in the sentence and the composition of the sentence from words is a higher level pattern or system that is composed from lower level patterns of words. This is how works fluid intelligence of smartness, it finds higher level patterns and lower level patterns of our universe constituted with low level patterns called matter or energy. More of my philosophy about happiness.. When you read my below writing you will notice that i am saying that happiness comes from pleasures of life and from like the mechanism of the alternance of the day and night and i am explaining the mechanism so that you understand it. But the question is: Am i really smart to say the above? since as you are noticing that i am saying that "happiness comes from", but i am not saying that "happiness also comes from", so as you are noticing it is like i am saying "happiness only comes from", so is it illogical to say so ? No, it is logical to say so , since i am also saying below in my political philosophy(when i am speaking about the Japanese lifestyle) that order can be considered a pleasure of life, so then it is logical to say in my above writing that "happiness only comes from", since notice in the above context that order is a "constraint" , so then we have to know how to define order, so then you can read my below philosophy and notice that order is constrained by morality that i am showing that it must be progressive, read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that you notice: More of my philosophy about what is the Nature of Personal Identity.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I invite you to look at the following short video: Raymond Kurzweil - What is the Nature of Personal Identity? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pb3zsuHwqvY&t=193s I think that Raymond Kurzweil in the above video is not answering correctly. So i think that it is a philosophical question of: What is the Nature of Personal Identity? So i think i am smart and i will answer it like the following: I think that you have to understand my philosophy about morality, here it is: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So as you are noticing that in my philosophy about morality i am proving that morality is perfection at best , and the "at best" is here in the definition of morality to make it a correct abstraction, and note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection So as you are noticing since morality is also perfection, so our identity or personal identity is also this perfection, since we can say that we are a civilization and this civilization is a dynamic process and it is the act or process of perfecting at best, so then you have to know how to be correct science and correct technology that brings perfection. And to be able to know more about my philosophy about existence, I have just created a webpage on my website here about my philosophy about human existence, you can read it carefully here: https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence About philosophy and Metaphilosophy.. I think i am smart, and i am doing philosophy, but you have to understand my way of doing philosophy, my way of doing philosophy is not what we call doing Brainstorming first and so forth, but i am most of the time like first finding the smart architectural ideas with my fluid intelligence, and it needs more smartness, so from those smart architectural ideas i am constructing more and more my philosophy, and you have to understand my philosophical smartness, since a very important thing for me, is also finding the soft power engines that permit people to efficiently go forward towards more and more perfection and that permit people to be smart, for example when you are genetically a person that greatly wants to show people that he is smart even if he is not smart, this genetically wanting greatly to show people that you are smart even if you are not smart is what we call an "engine" that permits to go forward towards more and more perfection, so in philosophy one of the most important thing is to find the mechanisms that play the role of "engines" that permit people to go efficiently forward towards more and more perfection and that permit people to become efficiently smart, this is one of the most important thing in philosophy, but not only that, but the goal of philosophy is happiness, but notice that it is the "goal", so the question in philosophy is how to efficiently attain the goal that is happiness, so an important question in philosophy is how to know how to be happiness, because if you say that happiness is only being pleasures of life, that's not the correct philosophy, so this is why i have to be inventive, and this is why you have seen me explaining what is happiness in my philosophy below, read it carefully and you will notice that i am answering this question by giving an answer in a form of a mechanism that plays the role of an "engine" that permits people to go efficiently forward toward more and more perfection and that permit people to be a smart, so as you are noticing that i have to be smart when i am inventing my thoughts of my philosophy. Here is my philosophy about happiness and notice how i am like creating the engine that permits to go efficiently forward towards more and more perfection: Is human life sad ? I think i am a philosopher and i will answer this question: When you are smart you will know that morality needs the right "balance", like a balance between competition and collaboration, or like a balance between individualism and collectivism, so human life is the same, it needs requirements so that to be pleasure of life, for example human life needs the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty and that brings pleasure, so i think human life has this kind of alternances that brings happiness and pleasures as an essence, for example when this Coronavirus crisis will be over, we will have learned how to appreciate much more our kind of civilization or pleasures of life, so the sadness of Coronavirus crisis will soon bring happiness and pleasures of life when Coronavirus crisis will be over, so as you are noticing it is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty and pleasure. Now do we have to measure it absolutely or relatively ? This is an important question in philosophy: So how do we have to measure happiness ? and is happiness real ? So i think that the philosopher Albert Camus was not smart when he said that human existence is absurd, by saying the following: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe's refusal to provide that." So what is the right way to measure it ? I think it is like science, since we are not yet perfect, so i think it is "hypothetical" to say that life is absurd like was saying the philosopher Albert Camus, because we have to to be pragmatic in science and measure it taking into account our "imperfections" and "limitations", so the are we happy must be measured in a pragmatic way, so then you can notice that my philosophy is more pragmatic, since it is explaining that happiness comes not only from pleasures of life, but it also comes from the alternance of being "hungry" for taking a rest and taking a rest or from the alternance of being hungry and eating a delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that make us more hungry for(and this gives a much greater intensity to pleasures of life, and this makes you much more happy) or make us appreciate much more the pleasures of life, so they make us more happy, and i think this is the secret of life, so then life is not absurd, since the meaning of life is that we are getting happiness from this kind of mechanism that looks like the alternance of the day and night from where comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so then we have to be careful by being selective of the kind of pleasures of life that make us happy so that for example to not be too much materialism that causes problems. From where comes happiness and pleasures of life? It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give yourself peace by taking a rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from where comes the meaning of human existence. More philosophy about do we have to measure it relatively or absolutely.. When you measure an IQ , you can measure it relatively to the distribution of other IQs, but is it the right measure? so this question is really important, since the philosopher Albert Camus was measuring the meaning and purpose of life by measuring it like absolutely by saying that human existence is absurd by saying: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe's refusal to provide that." But i think this is a mistake, since in my philosophy i am measuring the meaning of human existence "relatively" to pleasures of life that are like "powerful" drugs that bring us more happiness and so they give meaning to human existence(since they are like powerful drugs) and they permit us to go forward towards more and more perfection and this going forward towards more and more perfection is also the goal of morality(read below my political philosophy about morality so that to understand it), so i think i am right by saying so, so then human existence is not absurd. More philosophy about the secret of life.. I think i am a wise man, and i think that life has like a secret, and it is that it needs darkness and lightness but this both darkness and lightness is happiness, since darkness of life also become an insight that helps us, and also darkness of life is as a level of suffering that allows us to appreciate simple pleasures of life or pleasures of life, and this mechanism of life that is a level of suffering that allows us to appreciate simple pleasures of life also allows us to be happy, so when you are a wise man you will notice that life is like a mechanism that is smart, since life is like Swarm intelligence that brings the best. So we have to be optimistic. More of my philosophy about fluid intelligence and about consciousness.. More of my philosophy about is also our brain like a deep learning network that not only finds or see the pattern but it also gives the meaning of the pattern that is a dynamic or static system? i think that consciousness is the Value-added of processing with meanings that comes from like the feeling of our senses like the senses of touch etc. and it gives life and it permits to give happiness since our senses permit to feel pleasures of life, and this happiness permit to give meaning to human existence, so in my next posts i will explain much more deeply what is consciousness and what is fluid intelligence. This is why i just said the following: I think i am smart, and i think what gives what we call life to human has as an essence in what we call feelings, and i think that self-awareness is like a sense of touch or feeling of our own thoughts, and self-awareness is like we are constantly like feeling or touching our own thoughts, and i think this feeling is biologic, and i think that human consciousness is like the acts of feeling or touching, and it comes from our senses that are biologic, so we are feeling pleasures of life, and this gives happiness and meaning to human existence. More of my philosophy about the "divide and rule" approach and being genetically smart like a genius.. And from my previous thoughts(read them below), i think that being genetically smart like a genius comes with like a deep learning network that is powerful that permit to recognize complex patterns that are systems that are static or dynamic, so we can logically infer that the being genetically smart like a genius has also a mode of like hardwired powerful deep learning network in the brain that doesn't use the "divide and rule" approach and that permit to like find instantaneously the complex pattern with fluid intelligence without making any effort. Read my previous thoughts to understand: More of my philosophy about what is to be genetically smart like a genius.. I am a white arab, and i think i am genetically smart like a genius, and i will explain what is it to be smart like a genius: When you are solving a Mensa IQ test, there is different levels of problems in the Mensa IQ test going from less complex to more complex, so, you will notice that so that to solve the complex Mensa IQ problem with your fluid intelligence, you will have to find the pattern that is the system(static or dynamic) with your fluid intelligence, so now so that to understand what |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment