| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 16 09:22AM -0800 Hello, It is my last post about philosophy and politics here in this newsgroup. More philosophy about unequal distribution of income and opportunities in USA.. As you have just noticed i just said the following: I invite you to read the following interesting article: How the American dream turned into greed and inequality https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/11/the-pursuit-of-happiness-how-the-american-dream-turned-into-greed-and-inequality/ Here is the policy fixes for unequal distribution of income and opportunities in USA: One of them is taxation, combined with investment in productive infrastructure and education. So I think president Biden and its government have good policy fixes for unequal distribution of income and opportunities in USA, since the Biden plan would increase tax rates for individuals whose incomes are $400,000 and higher as well as for corporations which also would be subject to a new minimum tax on book income, also the Biden plan will invest in productive infrastructure, read here to notice it: https://www.enr.com/articles/51027-biden-major-infrastructure-plan-is-on-the-way More political philosophy about the what to expect from Biden-Harris government and ideology.. I have just looked at Biden-Harris ideology and i think that Biden-Harris government and ideology are smart and democratic( read my below thoughts about Democracy to understand) and progressive, you can notice it by for example reading the following article: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2020/08/13/what-to-expect-from-biden-harris-on-tech-policy-platform-regulation-and-china/ So as you are noticing that Biden-Harris are smart people because i think that to be successful in the future you have to spend much more on digital infrastructure, and this what Biden-Harris will do, so as you notice that the above article says the following 2- HIGHER SPENDING ON DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND ADOPTION PROGRAMS Inadequate and inequitable access to high-speed broadband prevents ordinary citizens from benefitting from the new economy. Our research has noted that basic digital infrastructure increasingly is required to access telemedicine, engage in online learning, apply for jobs, or get loans and mortgages. A Biden-Harris ticket could make closing the digital divide a national priority, especially for vulnerable urban and rural populations where obstacles in network deployment, affordability, and adoption still exist. So as you are noticing that Biden-Harris are smart people because they want USA to be efficiently prepared to take advantage of the exponential progress of capitalism and to be much more apt and efficient in learning and education so that also Democracy works correctly(so we have to be much more optimistic about USA), read the following very interesting article to understand more: Capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth Also Biden-Harris government and ideology want more competition and less confrontation with China.. Also Biden-Harris government and ideology want a greater tech regulation, so i think it is smart since i have also just spoken about Antitrust laws etc. so i invite you to read my following thoughts to notice it: More political philosophy about wich ideology to follow.. In political philosophy we can ask a question of: Wich kind of ideology to follow ? But i think that a smart answer to this question is also to answer the question of: Wich ideology to not follow ? This is why you are also noticing that also my way of doing is that i am also answering the question of: Wich ideology to not follow, read my following thoughts to notice it: More political philosophy about my new smart proverb.. As you have just noticed i have just written a new proverb, and here it is: "R&D (Research and development) and innovation bring or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so you have to know how to manage it and how to manage the risk brought by it, so then you have to know how to manage efficiently by not hurting good competition" Note that "volatility" in the the dictionary means: "A tendency to change quickly and unpredictably" Read more here to notice it: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/volatility This new proverb of mine also says that since the R&D (Research and development) and innovation bring or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so we have also to know how to manage it carefully and efficiently with Antitrust laws, and here is the why of Antitrust laws: "Antitrust laws are statutes developed by governments to protect consumers from predatory business practices and ensure fair competition. Antitrust laws are applied to a wide range of questionable business activities, including market allocation, bid rigging, price fixing, and monopolies." This new proverb of mine is also related to the below problem that brings nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition, read about it carefully in my below writing and thoughts: More political philosophy about what are the big economic problems of China?.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. Here is the big economic problems of China: First economic problem is that China is addicted to debt, look at the following video to notice it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT7DTn9PKLw Second economic problem is that China has Not enough PEOPLE for the FUTURE, look at the following video to notice it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4qFVuXEe-8 Third economic problem, is that China has the same problem of nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition that brings efficiency, and here it is, read it carefully: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more about China... I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and today i will speak about: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more.. We have to be more smart, i think China is also reproducing the mistakes of Japan, because Japan has protected its large industrial conglomerates called in Japanese "Keiretsu" and Japan has compensated there disadvantages even if they were not efficient, and Japan didn't hesitate to give the Keiretsu all kinds of advantages and privileges even if they were not efficient, and this was not good for "competition" and Japan has "failed" by doing it. Look in this video carefully to notice it: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? - VisualPolitik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vou96yLuWXw I think this is the same that is happening with China, since i think China needs an efficient mechanism that protects correct "competition" that brings good efficiency, read the following to notice it: Competition: Europe's awakening in the face of foreign subsidies Our state aid rules are very strict: an EU company can only receive grants of up to € 200,000 over three years. In China, the three 5G operators received 19 million euros each through the megalopolis of Shenzhen (12 million inhabitants)… According to the Wall Street Journal (article of December 25, 2019), Huawei would have benefited from 75 billion state aid via different channels, figures denied by the company. State capitalism of China obviously raises the question of the inequity of world competition ... The direction the Commission is taking through the "white paper" is not this at all. The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this point: "What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices. " Read more here: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fpolitique%2Femmanuel-berretta%2Fconcurrence-le-reveil-de-l-europe-face-aux-subventions-etrangeres-18-06-2020-2380631_1897.php And to know more about nationalism and economic nationalism, read my following thoughts: My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism. So the first philosophical question is how to talk about those above ideologies? I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following: Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge to the global optimum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local optimization and lack of global optimization , it is too much competition and lack of collaboration or cooperation, so it is by logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following: Read the following article about economic nationalism: Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/ Notice that it says the following: "Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries for their economic and political and national security well being. When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad policy." So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do. This is why i also said the following: More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism.. I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism, so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of the far-right political party in France: Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i think that this new model is better because it is more efficient , because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition. More of my philosophy about what is a successful country.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video: Why Israel is a Tech Capital of the World https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuPx61911Oo I think that this jewish from Israel that is talking in the above video is not thinking correctly, because there is two important things that you must have so that a country be successful: Capital and talents, the above video is making a mistake by saying that you need the two so that to be successful, i mean it is saying that you need Capital and talents, but i think he is making a mistake, because i think that Capital can attract talents, so Capital can make you successful as a country, so then i can logically infer that so that to have capital that make you successful, you have to know how to construct a product or services that you can sell from those competitive advantages of competitive part or parts of product or service that can come from you or/and can come from different countries of the global world, and it is i think an efficient way that makes you adapt quickly and efficiently in this globalization, and notice with me that having competitive part or parts of a product or service doesn't mean it has to come from R&D(Research and |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 16 07:25AM -0800 Hello, This was my last post about philosophy and politics in this newsgroup, from now on i will post only about parallel programming. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment