- More philosophy about being rich.. - 1 Update
- Here is my new smart proverb - 1 Update
- More political philosophy about what are the big economic problems of China?.. - 1 Update
- Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more about China... - 1 Update
- Look at the following video of How Israel rules the World of Cyber Security - 1 Update
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 09 05:03PM -0800 Hello.. More philosophy about being rich.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I have just looked at the following video, i invite you to look at it: China is producing billionaires faster than any other nation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqS7vo9xHE4&t=367s I think i am a philosopher, and i will rapidly invent a new proverb in front of you about the being rich: "There is being rich for being rich, but that's the stupid way, and that's not the right way to do, you have to know how to being rich by being the "right" perfection, since also morality is about being the right perfection, and you have to make a difference between being happy and being rich, because you can be happy without being rich, since even the exponential progress of our humanity will soon enhance much more our quality of human life, so it will make us much more happy." And here is my other new proverb: Here is my new smart proverb: "R&D (Research and development) and innovation bring or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so you have to know how to manage it and how to manage the risk brought by it, so then you have to know how to manage efficiently by not hurting good competition" Note that "volatility" in the the dictionary means: "A tendency to change quickly and unpredictably" Read more here to notice it: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/volatility This new proverb of mine is related to the problem that brings nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition. More about the exponential progress of our humanity.. As you have noticed i am posting my news about this exponential progress of our humanity, here is my new post about it, read it carefully: https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.usa/c/A33bKyvqufQ This is why i am a techno-optimist, because i think this exponential progress of our humanity is an amazing thing. More of my philosophy about how to be optimistic.. I have just talked more about my spirit in my previous post.. Now there remains a philosophical question of: How am i optimistic ? So how can we be optimistic ? So when you are a human and you look at a beautiful flower that we call a rose, you will have the tendency to like it, so it is like philosophy, we have the tendency to want to eat good food and to be more and more perfection so that to be the right perfection and strenght, and it is in philosophy like an engine that pushes humans forward towards more and more perfection, and as i am explaining it below in my philosophy that this strenght that brings perfection brings stability in this instability of life, so there remains a question and it is: How to be optimistic ? I think i am an techno-optimist and i say the following: More political philosophy about: Are humans smart ? So are humans smart ? I am very positive about humans, and i think that humans are smart, since we are also advancing by the following process of Swarm Intelligence that is so efficient, read about it here: How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/ So i think that "collectively", we humans, we are smart, and i think that you will soon notice it by the following exponential progress of our humanity, read about in my following thoughts: More political philosophy about do we have to be pessimistic.. I think it is a beautiful day in history, and how can you understand it ? First you will notice that the exponential progress of our humanity is going very fast and is going faster and faster , look at the following video to understand it: Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s So as you are noticing that you have to take this exponential progress of our humanity into account and be much more optimistic. And you have to know that this exponential progress of our humanity also comes from the following process: How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/ And here is my new poem called: "This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress" -- This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress Because it is a beautiful maturity but not the adolescence This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress And we have to beautifully tune it with the beautiful consensus This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress So let us not be just guesses but technicality and science This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress So let us be a beautiful expressiveness that is not helpless This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress So let us take together this beautiful breakfast This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress Since you are also like my so beautiful Princess This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress So let us be a beautiful presence for present and future acceptance -- More philosophy about is human life unstable and is human personal identity unstable ? I think i am also a philosopher, and i will explain: As you have just noticed i have just posted my new proverb about stability,and here it is: "Stability is obtained with the force of perfection, because when you become more perfect you increase your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities, and I think this is like a law of Morality" So there is a philosophical question of: Why have i posted this new proverb of mine ? Because i am smart, but when you are not smart you will think that human life is unstable because life is always changing and because we have always to adapt to it, and you will think too that human personal identity is always changing, but i am explaining in my above proverb that the force of perfection brings stability in this instability of life, i am not speaking of just money, i also mean that when for example you are more perfection brought by learning, you get more strenght that permits you to resist better to instabilities of life, and this better strenght is more stability that you become in front of instabilities of life. And i think that this more perfection that brings more strenght is also our personal identity that is both this more perfection and more strength that brings more stability. More of my philosophy about what is the Nature of Personal Identity.. I invite you to look at the following short video: Raymond Kurzweil - What is the Nature of Personal Identity? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pb3zsuHwqvY&t=193s I think that Raymond Kurzweil in the above video is not answering correctly. So i think that it is a philosophical question of: What is the Nature of Personal Identity? So i think i am smart and i will answer it like the following: I think that you have to understand my philosophy about morality, here it is: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So as you are noticing that in my philosophy about morality i am proving that morality is perfection at best , and the "at best" is here in the definition of morality to make it a correct abstraction, and note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection So as you are noticing since morality is also perfection, so our identity or personal identity is also this perfection, since we can say that we are a civilization and this civilization is a dynamic process and it is the act or process of perfecting at best, so then you have to know how to be correct science and correct technology that brings perfection. And to be able to know more about my philosophy about existence, I have just created a webpage on my website here about my philosophy about human existence, you can read it carefully here: https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence Here is my new proverb in english and french: Voici mon nouveau proverbe en français et en anglais: "La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection, car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités, et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité" "Stability is obtained with the force of perfection, because when you become more perfect you increase your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities, and I think this is like a law of Morality" Read my following thoughts to understand more what is morality etc.: I think i am also a philosopher, and i can also invent proverbs, here is yet another new smart proverb of mine: "There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a fool by lack of wisdom " And here is another proverb of mine: "Wich one has to precede, being able to reason correctly or to rush in like a fool without being able to reason correctly? when you are able to answer correctly this question, you will understand a very important principle that makes you much more wise." Here is another new proverb of mine.. "A wise man is by "logical" analogy like the person that knows how to prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one that knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized global world from the people." And here is my other new proverb: Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my explanation of my new proverb. Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below: My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or encourages us to be or allows us to become perfect or greatly perfect. Read about it here on my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So here is my new proverb: "Life is like the pretty perfume that calls us to be a pretty tomorrow!" So notice carefully my smart play on words in my new proverb, i think it's smart, and you have to know that the future perfection depends on the present perfection, so when today we are responsibility to be the pretty perfection so that to build the pretty tomorrow, then the pretty perfection of today is part of the pretty tomorrow, and the "pretty perfume" in my new proverb is also the today pretty perfection, but you have to understand the symbolic which allows us to say that being this part of the pretty tomorrow is also like being the pretty tomorrow. It is what makes it a smart proverb. More philosophy about fairness of life.. We say that life is not fair, but life can be much more fair or much less fair, and it depends on something very important, and i think it is efficient "learning" that makes human life much more fair for humans. So an important philosophical question is: How to be efficient learning ? I give you an example so that you understand: Look at the following web page about LEGO: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego So as you notice you have to find the important pattern with your fluid intelligence by looking at the above web page about LEGO. And the important pattern in the above web page of LEGO is that LEGO needs the "plans" to follow so that LEGO pieces can be assembled and connected in many ways to construct objects, including vehicles, buildings, and working robots. And the "plans" are so important, and now we can logically infer another philosophical question, and it is: How does the plan must look like so that the plan be efficient ? i think that the plan must follow and Top-Down approach, so it has to start from the Top of the plan to efficiently show like the higher level view of the design and after than it will get into a much details of the design, and also the plan must be efficiently easier to understand. And i think that it is the way of efficient learning, so read my following thoughts to understand about it more: Now today i will do political philosophy about Pedagogy.. Can we ask a philosophical question of: What must look like an efficient Pedagogy today?, i think that we have to notice that the exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns are influencing Pedagogy, because today we have to be more efficient at learning, because i think that the level of sophistication of today is much more than the past and i think that this has as a cause that we have to be much more sophisticated than the past to be able to be efficient learning, so for example we have to use an efficient Top-down approach to learning that looks like my above example of LEGO, , i think that it is the "first" requirement of today Pedagogy, and more than that we have to define the other main parts of what is it to be efficient learning, i mean what are the main parts of "efficient learning" that have a great importance ? take for example choosing the right tools for learning , so the first question of how to choose the right tools for learning is to know how to choose the right tools, not only that but to be able for the tool to be the right tool, the learning of the right tool must be made efficiently "easier" to understand, now you are noticing that the parts of efficient learning are becoming much more clear, so read my below thoughts to understand: What is happening in my brain ? I will speak more about me so that you understand my way of doing since it is also like my philosophy, to be more smart you have to be capable of reducing efficiently "complexity" so that to be efficient and so that to be more successful, but how can you do it ? you have to be able to know about the steps that guides you into the right direction, first i will speak about my way so that you understand me better, first step you have to be able to "prioritize" efficiently, because to be able to be successful you have to prioritize, so look for example at me, i have decided to "study" more and to study more "efficiently" so that to be more successful, but this is not "sufficient" to know, because to be able to be efficient at reducing complexity you have to be able to be efficiently selective of your knowledge, and this efficiently "selective" has to adhere in its turn to the process of being efficient at reducing "complexity", so you have to be able to select "efficiently" "efficient" knowledge that is more "easy" to learn so that to reduce complexity, thus you have to be able to ask "questions" to this or that right persons to be able to be efficient at selecting your "knowledge", next step you have to be "tenacity" at studying efficiently and you have to study more and more and you have to ask questions to your professors and next step after you have been able to learn more and more you have to be able at being efficient at "reusability" of your efficient knowledge and this is a very important |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 09 01:21PM -0800 Hello.. Here is my new smart proverb: "R&D (Research and development) and innovation bring or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so you have to know how to manage it and how to manage the risk brought by it, so then you have to know how to manage efficiently by not hurting good competition" Note that "volatility" in the the dictionary means: "A tendency to change quickly and unpredictably" Read more here to notice it: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/volatility This new proverb of mine is related to the below problem that brings nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition, read about it carefully in my below writing and thoughts: More political philosophy about what are the big economic problems of China?.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. Here is the big economic problems of China: First economic problem is that China is addicted to debt, look at the following video to notice it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT7DTn9PKLw Second economic problem is that China has Not enough PEOPLE for the FUTURE, look at the following video to notice it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4qFVuXEe-8 Third economic problem, is that China has the same problem of nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition that brings efficiency, and here it is, read it carefully: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more about China... I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and today i will speak about: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more.. We have to be more smart, i think China is also reproducing the mistakes of Japan, because Japan has protected its large industrial conglomerates called in Japanese "Keiretsu" and Japan has compensated there disadvantages even if they were not efficient, and Japan didn't hesitate to give the Keiretsu all kinds of advantages and privileges even if they were not efficient, and this was not good for "competition" and Japan has "failed" by doing it. Look in this video carefully to notice it: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? - VisualPolitik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vou96yLuWXw I think this is the same that is happening with China, since i think China needs an efficient mechanism that protects correct "competition" that brings good efficiency, read the following to notice it: Competition: Europe's awakening in the face of foreign subsidies Our state aid rules are very strict: an EU company can only receive grants of up to € 200,000 over three years. In China, the three 5G operators received 19 million euros each through the megalopolis of Shenzhen (12 million inhabitants)… According to the Wall Street Journal (article of December 25, 2019), Huawei would have benefited from 75 billion state aid via different channels, figures denied by the company. State capitalism of China obviously raises the question of the inequity of world competition ... The direction the Commission is taking through the "white paper" is not this at all. The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this point: "What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices. " Read more here: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fpolitique%2Femmanuel-berretta%2Fconcurrence-le-reveil-de-l-europe-face-aux-subventions-etrangeres-18-06-2020-2380631_1897.php And to know more about nationalism and economic nationalism, read my following thoughts: My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism. So the first philosophical question is how to talk about those above ideologies? I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following: Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge to the global optimum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local optimization and lack of global optimization , it is too much competition and lack of collaboration or cooperation, so it is by logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following: Read the following article about economic nationalism: Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/ Notice that it says the following: "Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries for their economic and political and national security well being. When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad policy." So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do. This is why i also said the following: More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism.. I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism, so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of the far-right political party in France: Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i think that this new model is better because it is more efficient , because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition. More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and when you are smart you will easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data, also PathNET is much more powerful since also it is higher level abstraction in artificial intelligence.. Read about it here: https://mattturck.com/frontierai/ And read about PathNet here: https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46 More about artificial intelligence.. I think one of the most important part in artificial intelligence is reasoning with energy minimization, it is the one that i am working on right now, see the following video to understand more about it: Yann LeCun: Can Neural Networks Reason? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfwNEY826I&t=250s I think that since i have just understood much more artificial intelligence, i will soon show you my next Open source software project that implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO, and i will write an article that explain much more artificial intelligence and what is smartness and what is consciousness and self-awareness.. And in only one day i have just learned "much" more artificial intelligence, i have read the following article about Particle Swarm Optimization and i have understood it: Artificial Intelligence - Particle Swarm Optimization https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization But i have just noticed that the above implementation doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence. So here is how to guarantee the optimal convergence in PSO: Clerc and Kennedy in (Trelea 2003) propose a constriction coefficient parameter selection guidelines in order to guarantee the optimal convergence, here is how to do it with PSO: v(t+1) = k*[(v(t) + (c1 * r1 * (p(t) – x(t)) + (c2 * r2 * (g(t) – x(t))] x(t+1) = x(t) + v(t+1) constriction coefficient parameter is: k = 2/abs(2-phi-sqrt(phi^2-(4*phi))) k:=2/abs((2-4.1)-(0.640)) = 0.729 phi = c1 + c2 To guarantee the optimal convergence use: c1 = c2 = 2.05 phi = 4.1 => k equal to 0.729 w=0.7298 Population size = 60; Also i have noticed that GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and SA(Simulated annealing) and Hill Climbing are much less powerful since they perform only exploitation. In general, any metaheuristic should perform two main searching capabilities (Exploration and Exploitation). Population based algorithms ( or many solutions ) such as GA, PSO, ACO, or ABC, performs both Exploration and Exploitation, while Single-Based Algorithm such as SA(Simulated annealing), Hill Climbing, performs the exploitation only. In this case, more exploitation and less exploration increases the chances for trapping in local optima. Because the algorithm does not have the ability to search in another position far from the current best solution ( which is Exploration). Simulated annealing starts in one valley and typically ends in the lowest point of the same valley. Whereas swarms start in many different places of the mountain range and are searching for the lowest point in many valleys simultaneously. And in my next Open source software project i will implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 09 11:31AM -0800 Hello... More political philosophy about what are the big economic problems of China?.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. Here is the big economic problems of China: First economic problem is that China is addicted to debt, look at the following video to notice it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT7DTn9PKLw Second economic problem is that China has Not enough PEOPLE for the FUTURE, look at the following video to notice it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4qFVuXEe-8 Third economic problem, is that China has the same problem of nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition that brings efficiency, and here it is, read it carefully: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more about China... I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and today i will speak about: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more.. We have to be more smart, i think China is also reproducing the mistakes of Japan, because Japan has protected its large industrial conglomerates called in Japanese "Keiretsu" and Japan has compensated there disadvantages even if they were not efficient, and Japan didn't hesitate to give the Keiretsu all kinds of advantages and privileges even if they were not efficient, and this was not good for "competition" and Japan has "failed" by doing it. Look in this video carefully to notice it: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? - VisualPolitik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vou96yLuWXw I think this is the same that is happening with China, since i think China needs an efficient mechanism that protects correct "competition" that brings good efficiency, read the following to notice it: Competition: Europe's awakening in the face of foreign subsidies Our state aid rules are very strict: an EU company can only receive grants of up to € 200,000 over three years. In China, the three 5G operators received 19 million euros each through the megalopolis of Shenzhen (12 million inhabitants)… According to the Wall Street Journal (article of December 25, 2019), Huawei would have benefited from 75 billion state aid via different channels, figures denied by the company. State capitalism of China obviously raises the question of the inequity of world competition ... The direction the Commission is taking through the "white paper" is not this at all. The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this point: "What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices. " Read more here: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fpolitique%2Femmanuel-berretta%2Fconcurrence-le-reveil-de-l-europe-face-aux-subventions-etrangeres-18-06-2020-2380631_1897.php And to know more about nationalism and economic nationalism, read my following thoughts: My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism. So the first philosophical question is how to talk about those above ideologies? I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following: Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge to the global optimum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local optimization and lack of global optimization , it is too much competition and lack of collaboration or cooperation, so it is by logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following: Read the following article about economic nationalism: Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/ Notice that it says the following: "Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries for their economic and political and national security well being. When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad policy." So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do. This is why i also said the following: More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism.. I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism, so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of the far-right political party in France: Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i think that this new model is better because it is more efficient , because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition. More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and when you are smart you will easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data, also PathNET is much more powerful since also it is higher level abstraction in artificial intelligence.. Read about it here: https://mattturck.com/frontierai/ And read about PathNet here: https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46 More about artificial intelligence.. I think one of the most important part in artificial intelligence is reasoning with energy minimization, it is the one that i am working on right now, see the following video to understand more about it: Yann LeCun: Can Neural Networks Reason? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfwNEY826I&t=250s I think that since i have just understood much more artificial intelligence, i will soon show you my next Open source software project that implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO, and i will write an article that explain much more artificial intelligence and what is smartness and what is consciousness and self-awareness.. And in only one day i have just learned "much" more artificial intelligence, i have read the following article about Particle Swarm Optimization and i have understood it: Artificial Intelligence - Particle Swarm Optimization https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization But i have just noticed that the above implementation doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence. So here is how to guarantee the optimal convergence in PSO: Clerc and Kennedy in (Trelea 2003) propose a constriction coefficient parameter selection guidelines in order to guarantee the optimal convergence, here is how to do it with PSO: v(t+1) = k*[(v(t) + (c1 * r1 * (p(t) – x(t)) + (c2 * r2 * (g(t) – x(t))] x(t+1) = x(t) + v(t+1) constriction coefficient parameter is: k = 2/abs(2-phi-sqrt(phi^2-(4*phi))) k:=2/abs((2-4.1)-(0.640)) = 0.729 phi = c1 + c2 To guarantee the optimal convergence use: c1 = c2 = 2.05 phi = 4.1 => k equal to 0.729 w=0.7298 Population size = 60; Also i have noticed that GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and SA(Simulated annealing) and Hill Climbing are much less powerful since they perform only exploitation. In general, any metaheuristic should perform two main searching capabilities (Exploration and Exploitation). Population based algorithms ( or many solutions ) such as GA, PSO, ACO, or ABC, performs both Exploration and Exploitation, while Single-Based Algorithm such as SA(Simulated annealing), Hill Climbing, performs the exploitation only. In this case, more exploitation and less exploration increases the chances for trapping in local optima. Because the algorithm does not have the ability to search in another position far from the current best solution ( which is Exploration). Simulated annealing starts in one valley and typically ends in the lowest point of the same valley. Whereas swarms start in many different places of the mountain range and are searching for the lowest point in many valleys simultaneously. And in my next Open source software project i will implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 09 10:55AM -0800 Hello.. Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more about China... I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and today i will speak about: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more.. We have to be more smart, i think China is also reproducing the mistakes of Japan, because Japan has protected its large industrial conglomerates called in Japanese "Keiretsu" and Japan has compensated there disadvantages even if they were not efficient, and Japan didn't hesitate to give the Keiretsu all kinds of advantages and privileges even if they were not efficient, and this was not good for "competition" and Japan has "failed" by doing it. Look in this video carefully to notice it: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? - VisualPolitik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vou96yLuWXw I think this is the same that is happening with China, since i think China needs an efficient mechanism that protects correct "competition" that brings good efficiency, read the following to notice it: Competition: Europe's awakening in the face of foreign subsidies Our state aid rules are very strict: an EU company can only receive grants of up to € 200,000 over three years. In China, the three 5G operators received 19 million euros each through the megalopolis of Shenzhen (12 million inhabitants)… According to the Wall Street Journal (article of December 25, 2019), Huawei would have benefited from 75 billion state aid via different channels, figures denied by the company. State capitalism of China obviously raises the question of the inequity of world competition ... The direction the Commission is taking through the "white paper" is not this at all. The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this point: "What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices. " Read more here: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fpolitique%2Femmanuel-berretta%2Fconcurrence-le-reveil-de-l-europe-face-aux-subventions-etrangeres-18-06-2020-2380631_1897.php Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Feb 09 09:21AM -0800 Hello... Look at the following video of How Israel rules the World of Cyber Security: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca-C3voZwpM Read the following to know more: Hackers sabotaged a water treatment facility in Florida by altering chemical levels, after accessing the installation via TeamViewer Read more here: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsecurite.developpez.com%2Factu%2F312454%2FDes-pirates-informatiques-ont-sabote-une-installation-de-traitement-d-eau-en-Floride-en-modifiant-les-niveaux-de-produits-chimiques-apres-avoir-accede-a-l-installation-via-TeamViewer%2F Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment