- converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ - 4 Updates
- Mixins - 6 Updates
- Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 (C++) buggy as hell - 10 Updates
- What does this program do ? - 3 Updates
- struct or class? - 1 Update
- Windows Process Tree - 1 Update
Gary Scott <garylscott@sbcglobal.net>: Nov 26 06:35PM -0600 On 11/26/2022 1:33 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: > for the users to specify their simulation. The main window looks a lot > like Visio. > https://www.winsim.com/screenshots.html These would have been super easy with GINO. It was designed exactly for this type of application. A GUI API tailored specifically for Fortran. |
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com>: Nov 26 08:39PM -0600 On 11/26/2022 6:35 PM, Gary Scott wrote: >> USA states )California, etc) are starting to regulate cpu power >> levels, these will probably drop as time goes on. >> Lynn We had a Gino CAD user interface on the Vax back in the 1980s. It was not easy to write nor was it easy to maintain. The plotter/printer interface was absolutely horrible, you essentially had to rewrite the driver for each plotter or printer model. Lynn |
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>: Nov 27 08:40AM > like Visio. > https://www.winsim.com/screenshots.html > Writing commercial software requires a lot of code. This is probably a few decades too late for the interface code, but have you looked at GTK and its Fortran binding, fortran-gtk? |
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Nov 27 04:33PM >>> levels, these will probably drop as time goes on. >>> Lynn >We had a Gino CAD user interface on the Vax back in the 1980s. I would expect that 40 years of updates would have fixed the problems you note below. http://gino.co.uk/ |
Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp>: Nov 27 10:16AM C++ templates are great for creating mixins. #cpp #gamedev #coding template <typename LayoutItemType> class size_policy_of_parent : public LayoutItemType { private: typedef LayoutItemType base_type; public: using base_type::base_type; public: neogfx::size_policy size_policy() const override { if (base_type::has_size_policy()) { return base_type::size_policy(); } else if (base_type::has_parent_layout_item()) { return base_type::parent_layout_item().size_policy(); } return base_type::size_policy(); } }; /Flibble |
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Nov 27 03:40PM +0100 Am 27.11.2022 um 11:16 schrieb Mr Flibble: > } > }; > /Flibble You could also do a ... if constexpr( requires( base_type base ) { base.xxx(); } ) ... |
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Nov 27 03:41PM +0100 Am 27.11.2022 um 15:40 schrieb Bonita Montero: > You could also do a ... > if constexpr( requires( base_type base ) { base.xxx(); } ) > ... if constexpr( requires( base_type base ) { { base.xxx() } -> convertible_to<base_type::size_policy>; } ) |
Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp>: Nov 27 03:16PM On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 15:40:17 +0100, Bonita Montero wrote: > You could also do a ... > if constexpr( requires( base_type base ) { base.xxx(); } ) > ... If I could have used if constexpr then I would have used if constexpr; I cannot use if constexpr as size policy is dynamic not static. /Flibble |
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Nov 27 04:37PM +0100 Am 27.11.2022 um 16:16 schrieb Mr Flibble: >> ... > If I could have used if constexpr then I would have used if constexpr; > I cannot use if constexpr as size policy is dynamic not static. I would dispatch that whole thing inside th LayoutItemType. |
Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp>: Nov 27 03:56PM On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 16:37:57 +0100, Bonita Montero wrote: >> If I could have used if constexpr then I would have used if constexpr; >> I cannot use if constexpr as size policy is dynamic not static. > I would dispatch that whole thing inside th LayoutItemType. You obviously don't understand how mixins work and are asserting things based on ignorance of the architectural design of my project. /Flibble |
Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp>: Nov 26 11:29PM On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 14:47:44 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> VS2019 just to get a working debugger. Also experienced ICEs with >> VS2022. > I found some oddities in 17.4.1 wrt the IDE, but nothing major. Well I would classify a non-working debugger and ICEs are pretty fucking major. /Flibble |
Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp>: Nov 26 11:30PM On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 00:33:32 +0200, JiiPee wrote: >> /Flibble > can u give one example of a bug? I use it in my work but did not find > anything major yet. I don't have the time to create a test case. /Flibble |
"Öö Tiib" <ootiib@hot.ee>: Nov 26 06:00PM -0800 On Sunday, 27 November 2022 at 01:30:55 UTC+2, Mr Flibble wrote: > > anything major yet. > I don't have the time to create a test case. > /Flibble You are lucky to have vs 22 ... i have only vs 19 ... perhaps because my own policy to ignore tools and technologies younger than 2 years old with excuse of immaturity. |
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Nov 27 08:02AM +0100 Am 27.11.2022 um 00:30 schrieb Mr Flibble: >> can u give one example of a bug? I use it in my work but did not find >> anything major yet. > I don't have the time to create a test case. LOL ! |
JiiPee <kerrttuPoistaTama11@gmail.com>: Nov 27 10:24AM +0200 On 27/11/2022 09:02, Bonita Montero wrote: >>> anything major yet. >> I don't have the time to create a test case. > LOL ! haha |
Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp>: Nov 27 10:14AM On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 08:02:06 +0100, Bonita Montero wrote: >>> anything major yet. >> I don't have the time to create a test case. > LOL ! What's so funny? It is not my job to fix Visual Studio, I have created Visual Studio bug reports in the past and, yes, I did create test cases for those bug reports. /Flibble |
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Nov 27 01:08PM +0100 Am 27.11.2022 um 11:14 schrieb Mr Flibble: > What's so funny? It is not my job to fix Visual Studio, I have created > Visual Studio bug reports in the past and, yes, I did create test cases > for those bug reports. VC++ bug reports are public. Show me the links. |
Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp>: Nov 27 01:23PM On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 13:08:06 +0100, Bonita Montero wrote: >> Visual Studio bug reports in the past and, yes, I did create test cases >> for those bug reports. > VC++ bug reports are public. Show me the links. I believe I made myself clear that I haven't created a bug report for VS2022 issues. /Flibble |
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Nov 27 04:38PM +0100 Am 27.11.2022 um 14:23 schrieb Mr Flibble: >> VC++ bug reports are public. Show me the links. > I believe I made myself clear that I haven't created a bug report for > VS2022 issues. I referred to you past filed bugs. |
Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp>: Nov 27 03:54PM On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 16:38:49 +0100, Bonita Montero wrote: >> I believe I made myself clear that I haven't created a bug report for >> VS2022 issues. > I referred to you past filed bugs. Why do you want to view those? /Flibble |
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>: Nov 27 01:29PM +0100 #if defined(_WIN32) #include <Windows.h> #elif defined(__unix__) #include <unistd.h>
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
|
No comments:
Post a Comment