| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 11 06:56AM -0700 Hello, More about division of Labor and about productivity and about specialization.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I have just talked about division of Labor and about specialization, and i said that too much specialization from the point of view of philosophy has its weakness in our modern world, but notice that when you become much older and you are not too specialized and you accumulate much more deeper and much more general experience and knowledge and you become an architect or Chief Technology Officer or such, it is also excellent, you can for example notice it by reading the following about Intel that is hiring and rehiring those types of architects and veterans so that to be successful: Shlomit Weiss returns to Intel as Head of Chip Development Read more here: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.developpez.com%2Factu%2F316610%2FShlomit-Weiss-revient-chez-Intel-au-poste-de-responsable-du-developpement-des-puces-un-nom-de-plus-dans-la-liste-des-veterans-qu-Intel-continue-de-reembaucher%2F And about division of Labor and productivity, read my following thoughts: So i will ask a philosophical question: How to manage efficiently complexity ? I think you can manage complexity by the "divide and rule" approach to management, which also leads to hierarchical division of large organisations, or wich also leads to the Division of "labour", you can read more about the Division of labour here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_labour Also you can manage complexity by using constraints, such as laws, road rules and commercial standards, all of which limit the potential for harmful interactions to occur, also you can manage complexity by using higher layers of abstraction such as in computer programming, and we can also follow the efficient rule of: "Do less and do it better" that can also use higher level layers of abstraction to enhance productivity and quality, this rule is good for productivity and quality, and about productivity: I have also just posted about the following thoughts from the following PhD computer scientist: https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/ Read more here his thoughts about productivity: https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/ And i think he is making a mistake: Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part, so it can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law). And it looks like the following: About parallelism and about Gustafson's Law.. Gustafson's Law: • If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel task then the serial component will not dominate • Increase the problem size to maintain scaling • Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall problem size Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it can take advantage of: • can consider weak and strong scaling • in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs • Amdahl's law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions • larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson's law Load balance is also a crucial factor. So read my following thoughts about the Threadpool to notice that my Threadpool that scales very well does Load balance well: --- About the Threadpool.. I have just read the following: Concurrency - Throttling Concurrency in the CLR 4.0 ThreadPool https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2010/september/concurrency-throttling-concurrency-in-the-clr-4-0-threadpool But i think that both the methodologies from Microsoft of the Hill Climbing and of the Control Theory using band pass filter or match filter and discrete Fourier transform have a weakness, there weakness is that they are "localized" optimization that maximize the throughput , so they are not fair, so i don't think i will implement them, so then you can use my following invention of an efficient Threadpool engine with priorities that scales very well (and you can use a second Threadpool for IO etc.): https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well And here is my other Threadpool engine with priorities: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/threadpool-engine-with-priorities And read my following previous thoughts to understand more: About the strategy of "work depth-first; steal breadth-first".. I have just read the following webpage: Why Too Many Threads Hurts Performance, and What to do About It https://www.codeguru.com/cpp/sample_chapter/article.php/c13533/Why-Too-Many-Threads-Hurts-Performance-and-What-to-do-About-It.htm Also I have just looked at the following interesting video about Go scheduler and Go concurrency: Dmitry Vyukov — Go scheduler: Implementing language with lightweight concurrency https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K11rY57K7k And i have just read the following webpage about the Threadpool of microsoft .NET 4.0: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/jennifer/2009/06/26/work-stealing-in-net-4-0/ And as you are noticing the first web link above is speaking about the strategy of "work depth-first; steal breadth-first" , but we have to be more smart because i think that this strategy, that is advantageous for cache locality, works best for recursive algorithms, because a thread is taking the first task and after that the algorithm is recursive, so it will put the childs tasks inside the local work-stealing queue, and the other threads will start to take from the work-stealing queue, so the work will be distributed correctly, but as you will notice that this strategy works best for recursive algorithms, but when you you iteratively start many tasks, i think we will have much more contention on the work-stealing queue and this is a weakness of this strategy, other than that when it is not a recursive algorithm and the threads are receiving from the global queue so there will be high contention on the global queue and this is not good. MIT's Cilk and Go scheduler and the Threadpool of Microsoft and Intel® C++ TBB are using this strategy of "work depth-first; steal breadth-first". And as you are noticing that they are giving more preference to cache locality than scalability. But in my following invention of a Threadpool that scales very well i am giving more preference to scalability than to cache locality: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well Other than that when you are doing IO with my Threadpool, you can use asychronous IO by starting a dedicated thread to IO to be more efficient, or you can start another of my Threadpool and use it for tasks that uses IO, you can use the same method when threads of the my Threadpool are waiting or sleeping.. Other than that for recursion and the stack overflow problem you can convert your function from a recursive to iterative to solve the problem of stack overflow. Other than that to be able to serve a great number of internet connections or TCP/IP socket connections you can use my Threadpool with my powerful Object oriented Stackful coroutines library for Delphi and FreePascal here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/object-oriented-stackful-coroutines-library-for-delphi-and-freepascal --- And enhancing productivity is also related to my following powerful product that i have designed and implemented(that can also be applied to organizations): https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal Please read the following about Applying the Universal Scalability Law to organisations: https://blog.acolyer.org/2015/04/29/applying-the-universal-scalability-law-to-organisations/ More of my philosophy about the stupid people.. Here is my just new proverb that i have just invented fast: "What is the best of the following? the stupid people that think falsely that Love and tolerance are the way to go, or do the stupid people have to be made wise so that to know how to be order and how to be happy? so as you are noticing that making the people wise must be the way to go, so as you are noticing you have to be careful about the appearances of the reality that are not the truth, and now you are understanding my following proverb that is so important and that is related to it: "Stability is obtained with the force of perfection, because when you become more perfect you increase your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities, and I think this is like a law of Morality" "La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection, car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités, et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité"" More philosophy about wich way of human life is the right way ? I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think i am a wise type of person, so i think that the architectural idea that is logically inferred is that we have like to make a difference between the appearance of a reality that is not the truth and the reality that is the truth, i think that the majority of humans have the tendency to "distort" reality in there minds (because they are not wise) or to be deceived by the appearances of the reality that are not the truth, let's take a quick example so that you understand: Take for example "sex", there is the "naive" way to look at sex as simply a pleasure of life, but when you get much more mature and wise, you will start to also look at sex as a power play or power game(comme un jeu de pouvoir) that makes the unhealthy relationship, so then you have to distinguish the right from the wrong, and this pushes me to say the following in french: "Ce qu'il nous faut en fin de compte c'est du savoir vivre ensemble qui ramène l'ordre, et cela demande que les êtres humains soient éduqués correctement â une philosophie de vie efficace." Here is the translation of my saying in english: "What we need in the end is knowing how to live together which brings order back, and this requires that human beings be properly educated with an effective philosophy of life." So i think that my important architectural idea is thus understood, so now you are understanding the why i am inventing many proverbs and posting them here, since those proverbs of mine permits you to also not be deceived by the appearances of the reality that are not the truth, here is some of my proverbs and notice how they permit you to distinguish quickly: "There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a fool by lack of wisdom" And Here is all my other new proverbs that i have invented fast: "When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability." Here is my new proverb: "When you are still organized like human animals you will have the strong tendency to want to marry with a beautiful women, but when you are critical thinking you have to ask yourself if all of us have to marry a beautiful women. So when you are critical thinking you have to think systemically about order" Here is my other new proverb: There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know how to live in harmony", so as you are noticing that it needs a good philosophy so that to avoid the mess of Israel. And here is my new proverbs: "The intelligent favors healthy eating over tasty eating, and by analogy we can also say that the intelligent also favors the effective speaker over the sweet talker" "L'intelligent privilégie le manger santé au manger qui a du goût, et par analogie on peut aussi dire que l'intelligent aussi privilégie le parleur efficace au beau parleur." Here is my just new proverb: "Even silence makes us advance, since a human life full of silence is not the right diversity as a balance that makes the good reliance" Here is my other just new proverb in english and french: "Learn to lift your head with dignity because even the sea has threatening waves." "Apprends à élever la tête avec dignité car même la mer a des vagues qui menacent." More of my philosophy about making big money.. Is making big money the right thing to do ? So there is the philosophical question and there is answering it from the individualistic point of view, since i think that philosophically we have to be "perfection" and perfection calls for "order", so you have to know how to be "order", since we can all start wanting to make big money quickly, but when you think about it, you will realize that this doesn't work, so this is why it needs philosophy, not just capitalism, so now you are realizing that you have to know how to manage human life so this is why i am talking to you about my philosophy and this is why i am also writing my thoughts as i am writing them, so it is by logical analogy like my following thoughts: More philosophy about R&D and economic growth and more.. I invite you to read the following interesting article that says that in the last 50 years, R&D has not increased much economic growth, but we have not to think just economic growth since we have to think the standard of living, so then we have to understand that the standard of living generally refers to wealth, comfort, material goods, and necessities of certain classes in certain areas. So i think that R&D has increased much the standard of living, so it is good for happiness. How important is R&D for economic growth? Read more here: https://www.rdworldonline.com/how-important-is-rd-for-economic-growth/ So i mean that making big money is by logical analogy like R&D has not increased much economic growth, but it has increased the quality of living so i think it has increased happiness, since we have to think the standard of living, since so that to be order in morality we have also to think how to be happiness, this is why i have written my thoughts of my philosophy that explains how to be happiness, read them below, and here is also what i have said about money: More of my philosophy about money.. I think i am smart, and what do i think about money ? Here is my thoughts of my philosophy and my other proverb about it: More philosophy about adaptation.. As you have just noticed i have just written a proverb about adaptation by saying: "You have to master the tools of adaptation", notice |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 11 06:09AM -0700 Hello, More precision, read again about more of my philosophy about our modern world.. I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the main problem of our modern world, it is the problem of the division of Labor that is the separation of tasks in any economic system, but this kind of specialization of the people from the point of view of philosophy is too much specialization of individuals that make them lack much knowledge and lack much wisdom, so the majority individuals of our world are not wise because of this specialization, and the majority of individuals of our modern world are like stupid people because of this specialization and this is the weakness of our modern world, so specialization is good for economies of scale but individually it lacks knowledge and it lacks wisdom. More of my philosophy about the stupid people.. Here is my just new proverb that i have just invented fast: "What is the best of the following? the stupid people that think falsely that Love and tolerance are the way to go, or do the stupid people have to be made wise so that to know how to be order and how to be happy? so as you are noticing that making the people wise must be the way to go, so as you are noticing you have to be careful about the appearances of the reality that are not the truth, and now you are understanding my following proverb that is so important and that is related to it: "Stability is obtained with the force of perfection, because when you become more perfect you increase your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities, and I think this is like a law of Morality" "La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection, car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités, et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité"" More philosophy about wich way of human life is the right way ? I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think i am a wise type of person, so i think that the architectural idea that is logically inferred is that we have like to make a difference between the appearance of a reality that is not the truth and the reality that is the truth, i think that the majority of humans have the tendency to "distort" reality in there minds (because they are not wise) or to be deceived by the appearances of the reality that are not the truth, let's take a quick example so that you understand: Take for example "sex", there is the "naive" way to look at sex as simply a pleasure of life, but when you get much more mature and wise, you will start to also look at sex as a power play or power game(comme un jeu de pouvoir) that makes the unhealthy relationship, so then you have to distinguish the right from the wrong, and this pushes me to say the following in french: "Ce qu'il nous faut en fin de compte c'est du savoir vivre ensemble qui ramène l'ordre, et cela demande que les êtres humains soient éduqués correctement â une philosophie de vie efficace." Here is the translation of my saying in english: "What we need in the end is knowing how to live together which brings order back, and this requires that human beings be properly educated with an effective philosophy of life." So i think that my important architectural idea is thus understood, so now you are understanding the why i am inventing many proverbs and posting them here, since those proverbs of mine permits you to also not be deceived by the appearances of the reality that are not the truth, here is some of my proverbs and notice how they permit you to distinguish quickly: "There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a fool by lack of wisdom" And Here is all my other new proverbs that i have invented fast: "When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability." Here is my new proverb: "When you are still organized like human animals you will have the strong tendency to want to marry with a beautiful women, but when you are critical thinking you have to ask yourself if all of us have to marry a beautiful women. So when you are critical thinking you have to think systemically about order" Here is my other new proverb: There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know how to live in harmony", so as you are noticing that it needs a good philosophy so that to avoid the mess of Israel. And here is my new proverbs: "The intelligent favors healthy eating over tasty eating, and by analogy we can also say that the intelligent also favors the effective speaker over the sweet talker" "L'intelligent privilégie le manger santé au manger qui a du goût, et par analogie on peut aussi dire que l'intelligent aussi privilégie le parleur efficace au beau parleur." Here is my just new proverb: "Even silence makes us advance, since a human life full of silence is not the right diversity as a balance that makes the good reliance" Here is my other just new proverb in english and french: "Learn to lift your head with dignity because even the sea has threatening waves." "Apprends à élever la tête avec dignité car même la mer a des vagues qui menacent." More of my philosophy about making big money.. Is making big money the right thing to do ? So there is the philosophical question and there is answering it from the individualistic point of view, since i think that philosophically we have to be "perfection" and perfection calls for "order", so you have to know how to be "order", since we can all start wanting to make big money quickly, but when you think about it, you will realize that this doesn't work, so this is why it needs philosophy, not just capitalism, so now you are realizing that you have to know how to manage human life so this is why i am talking to you about my philosophy and this is why i am also writing my thoughts as i am writing them, so it is by logical analogy like my following thoughts: More philosophy about R&D and economic growth and more.. I invite you to read the following interesting article that says that in the last 50 years, R&D has not increased much economic growth, but we have not to think just economic growth since we have to think the standard of living, so then we have to understand that the standard of living generally refers to wealth, comfort, material goods, and necessities of certain classes in certain areas. So i think that R&D has increased much the standard of living, so it is good for happiness. How important is R&D for economic growth? Read more here: https://www.rdworldonline.com/how-important-is-rd-for-economic-growth/ So i mean that making big money is by logical analogy like R&D has not increased much economic growth, but it has increased the quality of living so i think it has increased happiness, since we have to think the standard of living, since so that to be order in morality we have also to think how to be happiness, this is why i have written my thoughts of my philosophy that explains how to be happiness, read them below, and here is also what i have said about money: More of my philosophy about money.. I think i am smart, and what do i think about money ? Here is my thoughts of my philosophy and my other proverb about it: More philosophy about adaptation.. As you have just noticed i have just written a proverb about adaptation by saying: "You have to master the tools of adaptation", notice that we can say: "the tools for adaptation" or "the tool of adaptation", read in the following dictionary of psychology, and you will notice that it is saying the "tools of intellectual adaptation", read here to notice it: https://dictionary.apa.org/tools-of-intellectual-adaptation So this proves that the saying of my proverb is correct, here is my just new proverb and notice it: "You have to master the tools of adaptation, such as having a good education with a good education system, since getting rich quickly is not the wise thing to do, since mastering the tools of adaptation like having a good education will allow you to get rich and will allow you to keep you rich." More of my philosophy of how to be successful.. I think i am smart, and i will explain my way of how to be successful: 1- You have to have the engines that push you forward towards more and more perfection, so you have also to psychologically find those engines, so i have talked about some of them in my philosophy, so read it below. 2- I have to be both smart and creative, so this is why i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i am still inventing scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented powerful software tools and softwares, this first part is what makes me smart, the second part is that i am creative by inventing my philosophy and by writing two interesting and powerful books about computer programming and by having many new creative ideas in my mind etc. 3- I am using exponential thinking and exponential growth of capitalism so that to grow really fast and so that to build my big business and so that to sell my products and services. You can read more about my education and my way of doing here: Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k More of my philosophy about indian meditation and detachment.. I have just used the archaic or nonstandard simple past tense and past participle of hurt that is "hurted", from the 15th century to the mid-19th century, hurted was used as a standard alternative to hurt and various other spellings as the simple past tense and past participle of to hurt. From the late 19th century, well-known writers have rarely used it except in jocular fashion or in works for children. It is now nonstandard, here it is, read about it here: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/hurted So i will correct my mistake: I invite you to read the following interesting article about indian meditation: Meditation as a tool for Detachment https://jothivita.com/meditation-as-a-tool-for-detachment/ So as you are noticing that i have just talked about indian meditation by saying that indian meditation wants us to stop seeking pleasure of the senses so that to lower our expectations so that to not be hurt by our desires, and when you read the above article about indian meditation you will notice that it is saying The following: "Meditation becomes a tool to help develop Detachment" So as you are noticing that i was correct by speaking as i was speaking about indian meditation(read it below), but i think i am a smart philosopher, and i make you notice that there is a logical analogy between indian meditation and the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, since the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche wanted to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that indian meditation permits to attain this level of control, since when you develop detachment with indian meditation, it easy for you the process of becoming the superhuman of Friedrich Nietzsche that has mastery over his emotions and who takes joy in simply existing. More of my philosophy about how to make friends.. I invite you to look at the following video of a beautiful white european women: I Have No Friends | Why I Don't and How I've Learned to be Okay https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umpAC4pKFV4 So as you are noticing in the above video, that the beautiful women is saying that she has no friends, but i think i am smart and i will make you understand my way of doing, so how do you think i am making a lot of friends ? so by logical analogy you have to understand the way of indian meditation, since indian meditation wants us to stop seeking pleasure of the senses so that to lower our expectations so that to not be hurt by our desires, so my way of doing looks like indian meditation but it is not indian meditation, since by talking to you as i am talking about my philosophy and by posting here my poems of Love and by showing to you my kind of personality here in internet and by showing to you my thoughts... i am like building universal Love, but i am smart and i know that so that to build universal Love you have to build a trust relationship with others or a high level of trust relationship with others, and when you build this trust relationship with others it becomes easy to become universal Love or it becomes easy to make a lot of friends, so this is why i am building a trust relationship with others here in internet and i know that it is the basis of universal Love, so by logical analogy it is like indian meditation that wants us to lower our expectations by stopping to seek pleasure of senses so that to not be hurt by our desires, i mean that i am like lowering my expectation by being this basis of universal Love even if i have not a lot of friends, since i am confident that it is the right way that make us easily become universal Love and make us easily having a lot of friends. So i am positive. More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more.. I have just looked at the following video about: NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy, because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism: More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and Existentialism.. I invite you to read |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment