Wednesday, July 7, 2021

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 11 updates in 11 topics

Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 06 07:17PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about sex and about beauty..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
You have to understand my wisdom, i am much less beautiful than
white europeans or black africans or black americans, and i know that arabs are much less beautiful than white europeans and much less beautiful than black africans or black americans, so in french
i can say: "Alors puisque je suis un Arabe moche alors tu comprends bien que la relation devient malsaine, parce que je dois absolument construire ma dignité pour ne pas devenir un sale chiffon ou un genre d'esclave de la France ou autre pays, alors tu comprends bien que je ne suis pas là pour plaisanter avec toi, et ma dignité est trop précieuse pour moi."
 
And the translation in english is:
 
"So since I'm an ugly Arab then you understand that the relationship becomes unhealthy, because I absolutely have to build my dignity so as not to become a dirty rag or some kind of slave to France or some other country, then you understand that I'm not here to joke with you, and my dignity is too precious to me.
 
More philosophy about my personality as a white arab..
 
I think i am a wise type of person, and i am much less beautiful
than white europeans or black americans or black africans,
and i think that arabs are much less beautiful than black africans
or black americans or white europeans, so i am a wise type
of person that knows about this constraint, since it causes
a lot of discrimination towards arabs, so this is why i have to play it smartly with people, and so that to understand more how i am doing it, read my following thoughts:
 
More of my philosophy about my emancipation..
 
I am not like the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer movement and i am not like the feminist movement or such organized groups, i am alone constructing my emancipation by for example speaking and writing french and english and arabic , but speaking and writing three languages is not sufficient for me, so i have also got a Diploma in microelectronics and informatics, and i have studied operational research(it uses a lot of mathematics), and i have studied network administration and i have worked as a network administrator, and i have also worked as a software programmer consultant for many companies and i have worked as a software programmer consultant for some hospitals in USA, but it was not sufficient for me, so i have invented some softwares such as my PerlZip that looks like PkZip from PkWare and i have sold it to many companies and individuals around the world, and this was not sufficient for me, so i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented some very powerful software tools that i will sell, and i am also writing two books about software programming that i will sell, so i am alone constructing my "big" business by inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by inventing powerful software tools and by writing some important books in computer programming and i will use exponential thinking and exponential growth of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.
 
You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:
 
Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k
 
More of my philosophy about black africans and black americans..
 
 
I invite you to look at the following video of a black african or black american singer:
 
Seal - Crazy (Official Music Video)
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Fc67yQsPqQ
 
So if you are a wise man type of person like me, you will quickly notice
that the above black singer is beautiful and is also using his beautiful face and his beautiful sportive body so that to attract customers or consumers and so that to attract beautiful women and so that to have much more sex with beautiful women, and you can quickly notice that black africans and black americans are much more beautiful than arabs since they also have beautiful faces and beautiful sportive body and it is by analogy like having a localized smartness, but being a wise type of person is a much more globalized and efficient smartness.
 
More of my philosophy about is Human smartness just a particular survival strategy..
 
I think i am a smart philosopher and i will explain more,
notice in my below writing that the Senior Consultant (and former Editor-in-Chief and Publishing Director) of New Scientist and Author of After the Ice said the following:
 
"Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy"
 
I think it is stupid, because when you become rich using your smartness you transcend "survival" and you cease to use smartness as only
a survival strategy and you can start to use your smartness to become more and more rich or/and to living a much better human life etc. or when you have a high salary you are not thinking much of the time about survival since survival is only to remain alive, but you are living and being in a much better human condition, so this proves that Human smartness is not just a particular survival strategy.
 
More of my philosophy about beauty and about human smartness..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and as you have just noticed
i have just explained more the basis of my philosophy(read it below)
and now i will ask two philosophical questions and they are the following:
 
Are humans smarter than other animals?
 
And does universal beauty exists ?
 
So i will answer the first philosophical question by saying the following:
 
So i will start it by inviting you to read carefully the following webpage from a Senior Consultant (and former Editor-in-Chief and Publishing Director) of New Scientist and Author of After the Ice:
 
Why are humans smarter than other animals?
 
https://www.edge.org/response-detail/12021
 
So as you are noticing he is saying the following:
 
 
--
"The idea of human superiority should have died when Darwin came on the scene.
Unfortunately, the full implications of what he said have been difficult to take in: there is no Great Chain of Being, no higher and no lower. All creatures have adapted effectively to their own environments in their own way. Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy among many others, not the top of a long ladder. It took a surprisingly long time for scientists to grasp this. For decades, comparative psychologists tried to work out the learning abilities of different species so that they could be arranged on a single scale. Animal equivalents of intelligence tests were used and people seriously asked whether fish were smarter than birds. It took the new science of ethology, created by Nobel-prize winners Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch, to show that each species had the abilities it needed for its own lifestyle and they could not be not arranged on a universal scale. Human smartness is no smarter than anyone else's smartness. The question should have died for good."
--
 
 
So i think i am smart and say that the above webpage is not so smart, because the logical reasoning defect is that he is first saying the following:
 
 
"Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy"
 
 
This is the first logical defect, since he is like using boolean logic by saying that human smartness is only a particular survival strategy, and this is not correct logical reasoning, because we have like to be fuzzy logic and say that not all humans are using smartness for only survival, since we are not like animals, since we have not to think it only societally, but we can also say there is a great proportion of humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition than only survival. So now we can say with human smartness (and measure it with human smartness) that the humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition have a much superior smartness than animals, since we can measure it with human smartness, and here is the definition of surviving in the dictionary:
 
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/survive
 
So as you are noticing that survival is only to remain alive, so i am logical in my thoughts above.
 
The second logical defect of the above webpage is the following:
 
Notice that the above webpage that he is saying the following:
 
"Strangley enough, even evolutionary biologists still get caught up with the notion that humans stand at the apex of existence. There are endless books from evolutionary biologists speculating on the reasons why humans evolved such wonderful big brains, but a complete absence of those which ask if a big brains is a really useful organ to have. The evidence is far from persuasive. If you look at a wide range of organisms, those with bigger brains are generally no more successful than those with smaller brains — hey go extinct just as fast."
 
So i think that the above webpage is not right.
 
So notice again that he is saying that the brain must be successful in survival, and this is not correct reasoning, since as i said above smartness is not only about survival, since we have to measure it with our smartness and notice that from also my above thoughts that we can be humans that are much more smart than animals even if we go extinct.
 
So the important thing to notice in my above logical reasoning , is that you have to measure smartness with smartness, it is the same as my following logical proof about: Is beauty universal ? , here it is , read it carefully:
 
I will make you understand with smartness what about the following webpage:
 
Look at the following webpage from BBC:
 
The myth of universal beauty
 
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150622-the-myth-of-universal-beauty
 
So notice in the above webpage that it is saying the following about beauty:
 
"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"
 
So you have to understand that the above webpage from BBC is not smart, i will make you understand with smartness that beauty is universal, so if we take the following sentence of the above webpage:
 
"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"
 
So you have to put it in the context of the above webpage, and understand that the way of thinking of the webpage from BBC is not smart, because it is saying that since in the above sentence starvation is a risk , so heavier weight can be more attractive, but this can be heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes, so it makes a conclusion that universal beauty is not universal, but this is not smart because we have not to measure beautifulness with only our eyes and say that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is not beautiful, because we have to measure it with smartness and say that smartness says that in the above sentence that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is beautiful for smartness because starvation is a risk, so then with smartness we can say that beauty is universal. So we have to know that that the system of reference of measure is very important, by logical analogy we can say that measuring beautifulness with the eyes is like measuring individual smartness with only genetics, but measuring beautifulness with both the eyes and smartness is like measuring individual smartness with both the genetical and the cultural.
 
More of my philosophy about the problems of our humanity..
 
I think the Climate crisis that is a term describing global warming and climate change will be solved by using science and technology and i have posted about the new technologies that will be used to solve it, and i think we can fix capitalism using some reforms and it is not so difficult, but there is some problems that remain and they are the following:
 
As you have noticed(read below), the global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems, so this global average ecological footprint is growing more and more,
so economic growth can be separated from unsustainable resource consumption and harmful pollution. It is what our humanity has to do by
also using science and technology.
 
Some benchmarks for the year 2014:
 
The global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems.
 
A French person needs 4.7 gha to maintain his standard of living. If all humans consumed as much as a Frenchman, we would need 2.79 planets;
 
An American needs 8.37 gha for his consumption. If all humans consumed like an American, we would need 4.97 planets;
 
A Brazilian has an ecological footprint of 3.08 hag (1.83 planet);
 
A Chinese has a footprint of 3.71 hag (2.21 planets);
 
An Indian has a footprint of 1.12 hag (0.67 planet).
 
a Haitian has a footprint of 0.67 hag (0.4 planet).
 
 
And the other problem that remains is the following:
 
Look at the following video to understand it:
 
Global Junk Food: How the Western Food Industry is Making Poor Countries Fat
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEJwbGBrXfk
 
 
Yet more of my philosophy about capitalism..
 
 
I just written the following:
 
---
 
More philosophy about why raising taxes destroys the economy and more..
 
 
I invite you to look at the following interesting video:
 
Why raising taxes destroys the economy
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChpnX44_Ns
 
So i think you are understanding more that raising taxes destroys economy, so there remains an important thing and it is that we have to
fix capitalism in a smart way by more-effective regulation and not by raising taxes, since there remain the following problem, read about it here:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
---
 
 
So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:
 
How to Improve Capitalism
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU
 
So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and national pension funds representative of the long term collective interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to improve capitalism" so that to understand more.
 
More of my philosophy about relative and absolute measuring..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask
a philosophical question of:
 
How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?
 
I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy,
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 06 06:47PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
More philosophy about my personality as a white arab..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am a wise type of person, and i am much less beautiful
than white europeans or black americans or black africans,
and i think that arabs are much less beautiful than black africans
or black americans or white europeans, so i am a wise type
of person that knows about this constraint, since it causes
a lot of discrimination towards arabs, so this is why i have to play it smartly with people, and so that to understand more how i am doing it, read my following thoughts:
 
More of my philosophy about my emancipation..
 
I am not like the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer movement and i am not like the feminist movement or such organized groups, i am alone constructing my emancipation by for example speaking and writing french and english and arabic , but speaking and writing three languages is not sufficient for me, so i have also got a Diploma in microelectronics and informatics, and i have studied operational research(it uses a lot of mathematics), and i have studied network administration and i have worked as a network administrator, and i have also worked as a software programmer consultant for many companies and i have worked as a software programmer consultant for some hospitals in USA, but it was not sufficient for me, so i have invented some softwares such as my PerlZip that looks like PkZip from PkWare and i have sold it to many companies and individuals around the world, and this was not sufficient for me, so i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented some very powerful software tools that i will sell, and i am also writing two books about software programming that i will sell, so i am alone constructing my "big" business by inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by inventing powerful software tools and by writing some important books in computer programming and i will use exponential thinking and exponential growth of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.
 
You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:
 
Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k
 
More of my philosophy about black africans and black americans..
 
 
I invite you to look at the following video of a black african or black american singer:
 
Seal - Crazy (Official Music Video)
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Fc67yQsPqQ
 
So if you are a wise man type of person like me, you will quickly notice
that the above black singer is beautiful and is also using his beautiful face and his beautiful sportive body so that to attract customers or consumers and so that to attract beautiful women and so that to have much more sex with beautiful women, and you can quickly notice that black africans and black americans are much more beautiful than arabs since they also have beautiful faces and beautiful sportive body and it is by analogy like having a localized smartness, but being a wise type of person is a much more globalized and efficient smartness.
 
More of my philosophy about is Human smartness just a particular survival strategy..
 
I think i am a smart philosopher and i will explain more,
notice in my below writing that the Senior Consultant (and former Editor-in-Chief and Publishing Director) of New Scientist and Author of After the Ice said the following:
 
"Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy"
 
I think it is stupid, because when you become rich using your smartness you transcend "survival" and you cease to use smartness as only
a survival strategy and you can start to use your smartness to become more and more rich or/and to living a much better human life etc. or when you have a high salary you are not thinking much of the time about survival since survival is only to remain alive, but you are living and being in a much better human condition, so this proves that Human smartness is not just a particular survival strategy.
 
More of my philosophy about beauty and about human smartness..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and as you have just noticed
i have just explained more the basis of my philosophy(read it below)
and now i will ask two philosophical questions and they are the following:
 
Are humans smarter than other animals?
 
And does universal beauty exists ?
 
So i will answer the first philosophical question by saying the following:
 
So i will start it by inviting you to read carefully the following webpage from a Senior Consultant (and former Editor-in-Chief and Publishing Director) of New Scientist and Author of After the Ice:
 
Why are humans smarter than other animals?
 
https://www.edge.org/response-detail/12021
 
So as you are noticing he is saying the following:
 
 
--
"The idea of human superiority should have died when Darwin came on the scene.
Unfortunately, the full implications of what he said have been difficult to take in: there is no Great Chain of Being, no higher and no lower. All creatures have adapted effectively to their own environments in their own way. Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy among many others, not the top of a long ladder. It took a surprisingly long time for scientists to grasp this. For decades, comparative psychologists tried to work out the learning abilities of different species so that they could be arranged on a single scale. Animal equivalents of intelligence tests were used and people seriously asked whether fish were smarter than birds. It took the new science of ethology, created by Nobel-prize winners Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch, to show that each species had the abilities it needed for its own lifestyle and they could not be not arranged on a universal scale. Human smartness is no smarter than anyone else's smartness. The question should have died for good."
--
 
 
So i think i am smart and say that the above webpage is not so smart, because the logical reasoning defect is that he is first saying the following:
 
 
"Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy"
 
 
This is the first logical defect, since he is like using boolean logic by saying that human smartness is only a particular survival strategy, and this is not correct logical reasoning, because we have like to be fuzzy logic and say that not all humans are using smartness for only survival, since we are not like animals, since we have not to think it only societally, but we can also say there is a great proportion of humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition than only survival. So now we can say with human smartness (and measure it with human smartness) that the humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition have a much superior smartness than animals, since we can measure it with human smartness, and here is the definition of surviving in the dictionary:
 
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/survive
 
So as you are noticing that survival is only to remain alive, so i am logical in my thoughts above.
 
The second logical defect of the above webpage is the following:
 
Notice that the above webpage that he is saying the following:
 
"Strangley enough, even evolutionary biologists still get caught up with the notion that humans stand at the apex of existence. There are endless books from evolutionary biologists speculating on the reasons why humans evolved such wonderful big brains, but a complete absence of those which ask if a big brains is a really useful organ to have. The evidence is far from persuasive. If you look at a wide range of organisms, those with bigger brains are generally no more successful than those with smaller brains — hey go extinct just as fast."
 
So i think that the above webpage is not right.
 
So notice again that he is saying that the brain must be successful in survival, and this is not correct reasoning, since as i said above smartness is not only about survival, since we have to measure it with our smartness and notice that from also my above thoughts that we can be humans that are much more smart than animals even if we go extinct.
 
So the important thing to notice in my above logical reasoning , is that you have to measure smartness with smartness, it is the same as my following logical proof about: Is beauty universal ? , here it is , read it carefully:
 
I will make you understand with smartness what about the following webpage:
 
Look at the following webpage from BBC:
 
The myth of universal beauty
 
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150622-the-myth-of-universal-beauty
 
So notice in the above webpage that it is saying the following about beauty:
 
"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"
 
So you have to understand that the above webpage from BBC is not smart, i will make you understand with smartness that beauty is universal, so if we take the following sentence of the above webpage:
 
"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"
 
So you have to put it in the context of the above webpage, and understand that the way of thinking of the webpage from BBC is not smart, because it is saying that since in the above sentence starvation is a risk , so heavier weight can be more attractive, but this can be heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes, so it makes a conclusion that universal beauty is not universal, but this is not smart because we have not to measure beautifulness with only our eyes and say that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is not beautiful, because we have to measure it with smartness and say that smartness says that in the above sentence that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is beautiful for smartness because starvation is a risk, so then with smartness we can say that beauty is universal. So we have to know that that the system of reference of measure is very important, by logical analogy we can say that measuring beautifulness with the eyes is like measuring individual smartness with only genetics, but measuring beautifulness with both the eyes and smartness is like measuring individual smartness with both the genetical and the cultural.
 
More of my philosophy about the problems of our humanity..
 
I think the Climate crisis that is a term describing global warming and climate change will be solved by using science and technology and i have posted about the new technologies that will be used to solve it, and i think we can fix capitalism using some reforms and it is not so difficult, but there is some problems that remain and they are the following:
 
As you have noticed(read below), the global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems, so this global average ecological footprint is growing more and more,
so economic growth can be separated from unsustainable resource consumption and harmful pollution. It is what our humanity has to do by
also using science and technology.
 
Some benchmarks for the year 2014:
 
The global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems.
 
A French person needs 4.7 gha to maintain his standard of living. If all humans consumed as much as a Frenchman, we would need 2.79 planets;
 
An American needs 8.37 gha for his consumption. If all humans consumed like an American, we would need 4.97 planets;
 
A Brazilian has an ecological footprint of 3.08 hag (1.83 planet);
 
A Chinese has a footprint of 3.71 hag (2.21 planets);
 
An Indian has a footprint of 1.12 hag (0.67 planet).
 
a Haitian has a footprint of 0.67 hag (0.4 planet).
 
 
And the other problem that remains is the following:
 
Look at the following video to understand it:
 
Global Junk Food: How the Western Food Industry is Making Poor Countries Fat
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEJwbGBrXfk
 
 
Yet more of my philosophy about capitalism..
 
 
I just written the following:
 
---
 
More philosophy about why raising taxes destroys the economy and more..
 
 
I invite you to look at the following interesting video:
 
Why raising taxes destroys the economy
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChpnX44_Ns
 
So i think you are understanding more that raising taxes destroys economy, so there remains an important thing and it is that we have to
fix capitalism in a smart way by more-effective regulation and not by raising taxes, since there remain the following problem, read about it here:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
---
 
 
So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:
 
How to Improve Capitalism
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU
 
So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and national pension funds representative of the long term collective interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to improve capitalism" so that to understand more.
 
More of my philosophy about relative and absolute measuring..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask
a philosophical question of:
 
How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?
 
I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:
 
More of my philosophy about my philosophy..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i have just looked
at the following video about Hedonism, i invite you to look at it:
 
Why Hedonism Fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
But i think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 06 05:56PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about black africans and black americans..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I invite you to look at the following video of a black african or black american singer:
 
Seal - Crazy (Official Music Video)
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Fc67yQsPqQ
 
So if you are a wise man type of person like me, you will quickly notice
that the above black singer is beautiful and is also using his beautiful face and his beautiful sportive body so that to attract customers or consumers and so that to attract beautiful women and so that to have much more sex with beautiful women, and you can quickly notice that black africans and black americans are much more beautiful than arabs since they also have beautiful faces and beautiful sportive body and it is by analogy like having a localized smartness, but being a wise type of person is a much more globalized and efficient smartness.
 
More of my philosophy about is Human smartness just a particular survival strategy..
 
I think i am a smart philosopher and i will explain more,
notice in my below writing that the Senior Consultant (and former Editor-in-Chief and Publishing Director) of New Scientist and Author of After the Ice said the following:
 
"Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy"
 
I think it is stupid, because when you become rich using your smartness you transcend "survival" and you cease to use smartness as only
a survival strategy and you can start to use your smartness to become more and more rich or/and to living a much better human life etc. or when you have a high salary you are not thinking much of the time about survival since survival is only to remain alive, but you are living and being in a much better human condition, so this proves that Human smartness is not just a particular survival strategy.
 
More of my philosophy about beauty and about human smartness..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and as you have just noticed
i have just explained more the basis of my philosophy(read it below)
and now i will ask two philosophical questions and they are the following:
 
Are humans smarter than other animals?
 
And does universal beauty exists ?
 
So i will answer the first philosophical question by saying the following:
 
So i will start it by inviting you to read carefully the following webpage from a Senior Consultant (and former Editor-in-Chief and Publishing Director) of New Scientist and Author of After the Ice:
 
Why are humans smarter than other animals?
 
https://www.edge.org/response-detail/12021
 
So as you are noticing he is saying the following:
 
 
--
"The idea of human superiority should have died when Darwin came on the scene.
Unfortunately, the full implications of what he said have been difficult to take in: there is no Great Chain of Being, no higher and no lower. All creatures have adapted effectively to their own environments in their own way. Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy among many others, not the top of a long ladder. It took a surprisingly long time for scientists to grasp this. For decades, comparative psychologists tried to work out the learning abilities of different species so that they could be arranged on a single scale. Animal equivalents of intelligence tests were used and people seriously asked whether fish were smarter than birds. It took the new science of ethology, created by Nobel-prize winners Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch, to show that each species had the abilities it needed for its own lifestyle and they could not be not arranged on a universal scale. Human smartness is no smarter than anyone else's smartness. The question should have died for good."
--
 
 
So i think i am smart and say that the above webpage is not so smart, because the logical reasoning defect is that he is first saying the following:
 
 
"Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy"
 
 
This is the first logical defect, since he is like using boolean logic by saying that human smartness is only a particular survival strategy, and this is not correct logical reasoning, because we have like to be fuzzy logic and say that not all humans are using smartness for only survival, since we are not like animals, since we have not to think it only societally, but we can also say there is a great proportion of humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition than only survival. So now we can say with human smartness (and measure it with human smartness) that the humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition have a much superior smartness than animals, since we can measure it with human smartness, and here is the definition of surviving in the dictionary:
 
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/survive
 
So as you are noticing that survival is only to remain alive, so i am logical in my thoughts above.
 
The second logical defect of the above webpage is the following:
 
Notice that the above webpage that he is saying the following:
 
"Strangley enough, even evolutionary biologists still get caught up with the notion that humans stand at the apex of existence. There are endless books from evolutionary biologists speculating on the reasons why humans evolved such wonderful big brains, but a complete absence of those which ask if a big brains is a really useful organ to have. The evidence is far from persuasive. If you look at a wide range of organisms, those with bigger brains are generally no more successful than those with smaller brains — hey go extinct just as fast."
 
So i think that the above webpage is not right.
 
So notice again that he is saying that the brain must be successful in survival, and this is not correct reasoning, since as i said above smartness is not only about survival, since we have to measure it with our smartness and notice that from also my above thoughts that we can be humans that are much more smart than animals even if we go extinct.
 
So the important thing to notice in my above logical reasoning , is that you have to measure smartness with smartness, it is the same as my following logical proof about: Is beauty universal ? , here it is , read it carefully:
 
I will make you understand with smartness what about the following webpage:
 
Look at the following webpage from BBC:
 
The myth of universal beauty
 
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150622-the-myth-of-universal-beauty
 
So notice in the above webpage that it is saying the following about beauty:
 
"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"
 
So you have to understand that the above webpage from BBC is not smart, i will make you understand with smartness that beauty is universal, so if we take the following sentence of the above webpage:
 
"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"
 
So you have to put it in the context of the above webpage, and understand that the way of thinking of the webpage from BBC is not smart, because it is saying that since in the above sentence starvation is a risk , so heavier weight can be more attractive, but this can be heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes, so it makes a conclusion that universal beauty is not universal, but this is not smart because we have not to measure beautifulness with only our eyes and say that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is not beautiful, because we have to measure it with smartness and say that smartness says that in the above sentence that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is beautiful for smartness because starvation is a risk, so then with smartness we can say that beauty is universal. So we have to know that that the system of reference of measure is very important, by logical analogy we can say that measuring beautifulness with the eyes is like measuring individual smartness with only genetics, but measuring beautifulness with both the eyes and smartness is like measuring individual smartness with both the genetical and the cultural.
 
More of my philosophy about the problems of our humanity..
 
I think the Climate crisis that is a term describing global warming and climate change will be solved by using science and technology and i have posted about the new technologies that will be used to solve it, and i think we can fix capitalism using some reforms and it is not so difficult, but there is some problems that remain and they are the following:
 
As you have noticed(read below), the global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems, so this global average ecological footprint is growing more and more,
so economic growth can be separated from unsustainable resource consumption and harmful pollution. It is what our humanity has to do by
also using science and technology.
 
Some benchmarks for the year 2014:
 
The global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems.
 
A French person needs 4.7 gha to maintain his standard of living. If all humans consumed as much as a Frenchman, we would need 2.79 planets;
 
An American needs 8.37 gha for his consumption. If all humans consumed like an American, we would need 4.97 planets;
 
A Brazilian has an ecological footprint of 3.08 hag (1.83 planet);
 
A Chinese has a footprint of 3.71 hag (2.21 planets);
 
An Indian has a footprint of 1.12 hag (0.67 planet).
 
a Haitian has a footprint of 0.67 hag (0.4 planet).
 
 
And the other problem that remains is the following:
 
Look at the following video to understand it:
 
Global Junk Food: How the Western Food Industry is Making Poor Countries Fat
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEJwbGBrXfk
 
 
Yet more of my philosophy about capitalism..
 
 
I just written the following:
 
---
 
More philosophy about why raising taxes destroys the economy and more..
 
 
I invite you to look at the following interesting video:
 
Why raising taxes destroys the economy
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChpnX44_Ns
 
So i think you are understanding more that raising taxes destroys economy, so there remains an important thing and it is that we have to
fix capitalism in a smart way by more-effective regulation and not by raising taxes, since there remain the following problem, read about it here:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
---
 
 
So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:
 
How to Improve Capitalism
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU
 
So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and national pension funds representative of the long term collective interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to improve capitalism" so that to understand more.
 
More of my philosophy about relative and absolute measuring..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask
a philosophical question of:
 
How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?
 
I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:
 
More of my philosophy about my philosophy..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i have just looked
at the following video about Hedonism, i invite you to look at it:
 
Why Hedonism Fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
But i think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about arabs and muslims in western countries..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I invite you to look at this interesting video about muslim immigrants
in Norway:
 
Norway's Muslim immigrants attend classes on western attitudes to women
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKY600o3CXw
 
I think that the norwegians don't understand correctly what is
arab and muslim countries and don't understand arab and muslim people, and since i am a white arab , i invite to read my following proverbs and thoughts so that to understand more arabs and muslims:
 
More of my philosophy about humans animal instincts..
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that humans are behaving like inferior animals since they are also guided by there "tendencies" of there animal instincts that want to be too much individualistic or hedonistic or to want beautiful womens or need to make much more sex with beautiful womens etc. but i think that the right way is that they have to love and want to be morality and order, so it is by logical analogy like my following proverb:
 
"There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality
and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be
confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand
the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how
to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a
fool by lack of wisdom "
 
The appearance of a reality in my proverb above is by logical analogy like the tendencies brought by animal instincts of
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 06 04:21PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about is Human smartness just a particular survival strategy..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am a smart philosopher and i will explain more,
notice in my below writing that the Senior Consultant (and former Editor-in-Chief and Publishing Director) of New Scientist and Author of After the Ice said the following:
 
"Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy"
 
I think it is stupid, because when you become rich using your smartness you transcend "survival" and you cease to use smartness as only
a survival strategy and you can start to use your smartness to become more and more rich or/and to living a much better human life etc. or when you have a high salary you are not thinking much of the time about survival since survival is only to remain alive, but you are living and being in a much better human condition, so this proves that Human smartness is not just a particular survival strategy.
 
More of my philosophy about beauty and about human smartness..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and as you have just noticed
i have just explained more the basis of my philosophy(read it below)
and now i will ask two philosophical questions and they are the following:
 
Are humans smarter than other animals?
 
And does universal beauty exists ?
 
So i will answer the first philosophical question by saying the following:
 
So i will start it by inviting you to read carefully the following webpage from a Senior Consultant (and former Editor-in-Chief and Publishing Director) of New Scientist and Author of After the Ice:
 
Why are humans smarter than other animals?
 
https://www.edge.org/response-detail/12021
 
So as you are noticing he is saying the following:
 
 
--
"The idea of human superiority should have died when Darwin came on the scene.
Unfortunately, the full implications of what he said have been difficult to take in: there is no Great Chain of Being, no higher and no lower. All creatures have adapted effectively to their own environments in their own way. Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy among many others, not the top of a long ladder. It took a surprisingly long time for scientists to grasp this. For decades, comparative psychologists tried to work out the learning abilities of different species so that they could be arranged on a single scale. Animal equivalents of intelligence tests were used and people seriously asked whether fish were smarter than birds. It took the new science of ethology, created by Nobel-prize winners Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch, to show that each species had the abilities it needed for its own lifestyle and they could not be not arranged on a universal scale. Human smartness is no smarter than anyone else's smartness. The question should have died for good."
--
 
 
So i think i am smart and say that the above webpage is not so smart, because the logical reasoning defect is that he is first saying the following:
 
 
"Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy"
 
 
This is the first logical defect, since he is like using boolean logic by saying that human smartness is only a particular survival strategy, and this is not correct logical reasoning, because we have like to be fuzzy logic and say that not all humans are using smartness for only survival, since we are not like animals, since we have not to think it only societally, but we can also say there is a great proportion of humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition than only survival. So now we can say with human smartness (and measure it with human smartness) that the humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition have a much superior smartness than animals, since we can measure it with human smartness, and here is the definition of surviving in the dictionary:
 
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/survive
 
So as you are noticing that survival is only to remain alive, so i am logical in my thoughts above.
 
The second logical defect of the above webpage is the following:
 
Notice that the above webpage that he is saying the following:
 
"Strangley enough, even evolutionary biologists still get caught up with the notion that humans stand at the apex of existence. There are endless books from evolutionary biologists speculating on the reasons why humans evolved such wonderful big brains, but a complete absence of those which ask if a big brains is a really useful organ to have. The evidence is far from persuasive. If you look at a wide range of organisms, those with bigger brains are generally no more successful than those with smaller brains — hey go extinct just as fast."
 
So i think that the above webpage is not right.
 
So notice again that he is saying that the brain must be successful in survival, and this is not correct reasoning, since as i said above smartness is not only about survival, since we have to measure it with our smartness and notice that from also my above thoughts that we can be humans that are much more smart than animals even if we go extinct.
 
So the important thing to notice in my above logical reasoning , is that you have to measure smartness with smartness, it is the same as my following logical proof about: Is beauty universal ? , here it is , read it carefully:
 
I will make you understand with smartness what about the following webpage:
 
Look at the following webpage from BBC:
 
The myth of universal beauty
 
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150622-the-myth-of-universal-beauty
 
So notice in the above webpage that it is saying the following about beauty:
 
"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"
 
So you have to understand that the above webpage from BBC is not smart, i will make you understand with smartness that beauty is universal, so if we take the following sentence of the above webpage:
 
"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"
 
So you have to put it in the context of the above webpage, and understand that the way of thinking of the webpage from BBC is not smart, because it is saying that since in the above sentence starvation is a risk , so heavier weight can be more attractive, but this can be heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes, so it makes a conclusion that universal beauty is not universal, but this is not smart because we have not to measure beautifulness with only our eyes and say that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is not beautiful, because we have to measure it with smartness and say that smartness says that in the above sentence that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is beautiful for smartness because starvation is a risk, so then with smartness we can say that beauty is universal. So we have to know that that the system of reference of measure is very important, by logical analogy we can say that measuring beautifulness with the eyes is like measuring individual smartness with only genetics, but measuring beautifulness with both the eyes and smartness is like measuring individual smartness with both the genetical and the cultural.
 
More of my philosophy about the problems of our humanity..
 
I think the Climate crisis that is a term describing global warming and climate change will be solved by using science and technology and i have posted about the new technologies that will be used to solve it, and i think we can fix capitalism using some reforms and it is not so difficult, but there is some problems that remain and they are the following:
 
As you have noticed(read below), the global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems, so this global average ecological footprint is growing more and more,
so economic growth can be separated from unsustainable resource consumption and harmful pollution. It is what our humanity has to do by
also using science and technology.
 
Some benchmarks for the year 2014:
 
The global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems.
 
A French person needs 4.7 gha to maintain his standard of living. If all humans consumed as much as a Frenchman, we would need 2.79 planets;
 
An American needs 8.37 gha for his consumption. If all humans consumed like an American, we would need 4.97 planets;
 
A Brazilian has an ecological footprint of 3.08 hag (1.83 planet);
 
A Chinese has a footprint of 3.71 hag (2.21 planets);
 
An Indian has a footprint of 1.12 hag (0.67 planet).
 
a Haitian has a footprint of 0.67 hag (0.4 planet).
 
 
And the other problem that remains is the following:
 
Look at the following video to understand it:
 
Global Junk Food: How the Western Food Industry is Making Poor Countries Fat
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEJwbGBrXfk
 
 
Yet more of my philosophy about capitalism..
 
 
I just written the following:
 
---
 
More philosophy about why raising taxes destroys the economy and more..
 
 
I invite you to look at the following interesting video:
 
Why raising taxes destroys the economy
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChpnX44_Ns
 
So i think you are understanding more that raising taxes destroys economy, so there remains an important thing and it is that we have to
fix capitalism in a smart way by more-effective regulation and not by raising taxes, since there remain the following problem, read about it here:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
---
 
 
So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:
 
How to Improve Capitalism
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU
 
So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and national pension funds representative of the long term collective interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to improve capitalism" so that to understand more.
 
More of my philosophy about relative and absolute measuring..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask
a philosophical question of:
 
How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?
 
I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:
 
More of my philosophy about my philosophy..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i have just looked
at the following video about Hedonism, i invite you to look at it:
 
Why Hedonism Fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
But i think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about arabs and muslims in western countries..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I invite you to look at this interesting video about muslim immigrants
in Norway:
 
Norway's Muslim immigrants attend classes on western attitudes to women
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKY600o3CXw
 
I think that the norwegians don't understand correctly what is
arab and muslim countries and don't understand arab and muslim people, and since i am a white arab , i invite to read my following proverbs and thoughts so that to understand more arabs and muslims:
 
More of my philosophy about humans animal instincts..
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that humans are behaving like inferior animals since they are also guided by there "tendencies" of there animal instincts that want to be too much individualistic or hedonistic or to want beautiful womens or need to make much more sex with beautiful womens etc. but i think that the right way is that they have to love and want to be morality and order, so it is by logical analogy like my following proverb:
 
"There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality
and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be
confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand
the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how
to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a
fool by lack of wisdom "
 
The appearance of a reality in my proverb above is by logical analogy like the tendencies brought by animal instincts of humans that make us not walk in or take the right path, so we have to educate correctly humans and to make them love and want to be morality and order.
 
And i think i am a wise type of person and here my other proverb about the wise man:
 
"A wise man is by "logical" analogy like the person that knows how to
prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one that
knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized global
world from the people."
 
And Here is all my other new proverbs that i have invented fast:
 
"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 06 03:32PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
Read again about more of my philosophy about beauty and about human smartness..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and as you have just noticed
i have just explained more the basis of my philosophy(read it below)
and now i will ask two philosophical questions and they are the following:
 
Are humans smarter than other animals?
 
And does universal beauty exists ?
 
So i will answer the first philosophical question by saying the following:
 
So i will start it by inviting you to read carefully the following webpage from a Senior Consultant (and former Editor-in-Chief and Publishing Director) of New Scientist and Author of After the Ice:
 
Why are humans smarter than other animals?
 
https://www.edge.org/response-detail/12021
 
So as you are noticing he is saying the following:

 
--
"The idea of human superiority should have died when Darwin came on the scene.
Unfortunately, the full implications of what he said have been difficult to take in: there is no Great Chain of Being, no higher and no lower. All creatures have adapted effectively to their own environments in their own way. Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy among many others, not the top of a long ladder. It took a surprisingly long time for scientists to grasp this. For decades, comparative psychologists tried to work out the learning abilities of different species so that they could be arranged on a single scale. Animal equivalents of intelligence tests were used and people seriously asked whether fish were smarter than birds. It took the new science of ethology, created by Nobel-prize winners Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch, to show that each species had the abilities it needed for its own lifestyle and they could not be not arranged on a universal scale. Human smartness is no smarter than anyone else's smartness. The question should have died for good."
--

 
So i think i am smart and say that the above webpage is not so smart, because the logical reasoning defect is that he is first saying the following:

 
"Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy"

 
This is the first logical defect, since he is like using boolean logic by saying that human smartness is only a particular survival strategy, and this is not correct logical reasoning, because we have like to be fuzzy logic and say that not all humans are using smartness for only survival, since we are not like animals, since we have not to think it only societally, but we can also say there is a great proportion of humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition than only survival. So now we can say with human smartness (and measure it with human smartness) that the humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition have a much superior smartness than animals, since we can measure it with human smartness, and here is the definition of surviving in the dictionary:

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/survive
 
So as you are noticing that survival is only to remain alive, so i am logical in my thoughts above.
 
The second logical defect of the above webpage is the following:
 
Notice that the above webpage that he is saying the following:
 
"Strangley enough, even evolutionary biologists still get caught up with the notion that humans stand at the apex of existence. There are endless books from evolutionary biologists speculating on the reasons why humans evolved such wonderful big brains, but a complete absence of those which ask if a big brains is a really useful organ to have. The evidence is far from persuasive. If you look at a wide range of organisms, those with bigger brains are generally no more successful than those with smaller brains — hey go extinct just as fast."
 
So i think that the above webpage is not right.
 
So notice again that he is saying that the brain must be successful in survival, and this is not correct reasoning, since as i said above smartness is not only about survival, since we have to measure it with our smartness and notice that from also my above thoughts that we can be humans that are much more smart than animals even if we go extinct.
 
So the important thing to notice in my above logical reasoning , is that you have to measure smartness with smartness, it is the same as my following logical proof about: Is beauty universal ? , here it is , read it carefully:
 
I will make you understand with smartness what about the following webpage:

Look at the following webpage from BBC:
 
The myth of universal beauty

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150622-the-myth-of-universal-beauty

So notice in the above webpage that it is saying the following about beauty:

"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"

So you have to understand that the above webpage from BBC is not smart, i will make you understand with smartness that beauty is universal, so if we take the following sentence of the above webpage:

"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"

So you have to put it in the context of the above webpage, and understand that the way of thinking of the webpage from BBC is not smart, because it is saying that since in the above sentence starvation is a risk , so heavier weight can be more attractive, but this can be heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes, so it makes a conclusion that universal beauty is not universal, but this is not smart because we have not to measure beautifulness with only our eyes and say that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is not beautiful, because we have to measure it with smartness and say that smartness says that in the above sentence that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is beautiful for smartness because starvation is a risk, so then with smartness we can say that beauty is universal. So we have to know that that the system of reference of measure is very important, by logical analogy we can say that measuring beautifulness with the eyes is like measuring individual smartness with only genetics, but measuring beautifulness with both the eyes and smartness is like measuring individual smartness with both the genetical and the cultural.

More of my philosophy about the problems of our humanity..
 
I think the Climate crisis that is a term describing global warming and climate change will be solved by using science and technology and i have posted about the new technologies that will be used to solve it, and i think we can fix capitalism using some reforms and it is not so difficult, but there is some problems that remain and they are the following:
 
As you have noticed(read below), the global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems, so this global average ecological footprint is growing more and more,
so economic growth can be separated from unsustainable resource consumption and harmful pollution. It is what our humanity has to do by
also using science and technology.
 
Some benchmarks for the year 2014:
 
The global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems.
 
A French person needs 4.7 gha to maintain his standard of living. If all humans consumed as much as a Frenchman, we would need 2.79 planets;
 
An American needs 8.37 gha for his consumption. If all humans consumed like an American, we would need 4.97 planets;
 
A Brazilian has an ecological footprint of 3.08 hag (1.83 planet);
 
A Chinese has a footprint of 3.71 hag (2.21 planets);
 
An Indian has a footprint of 1.12 hag (0.67 planet).
 
a Haitian has a footprint of 0.67 hag (0.4 planet).
 
 
And the other problem that remains is the following:
 
Look at the following video to understand it:
 
Global Junk Food: How the Western Food Industry is Making Poor Countries Fat
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEJwbGBrXfk
 
 
Yet more of my philosophy about capitalism..
 
 
I just written the following:
 
---
 
More philosophy about why raising taxes destroys the economy and more..
 
 
I invite you to look at the following interesting video:
 
Why raising taxes destroys the economy
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChpnX44_Ns
 
So i think you are understanding more that raising taxes destroys economy, so there remains an important thing and it is that we have to
fix capitalism in a smart way by more-effective regulation and not by raising taxes, since there remain the following problem, read about it here:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
---
 
 
So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:
 
How to Improve Capitalism
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU
 
So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and national pension funds representative of the long term collective interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to improve capitalism" so that to understand more.
 
More of my philosophy about relative and absolute measuring..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask
a philosophical question of:
 
How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?
 
I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:
 
More of my philosophy about my philosophy..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i have just looked
at the following video about Hedonism, i invite you to look at it:
 
Why Hedonism Fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
But i think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about arabs and muslims in western countries..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I invite you to look at this interesting video about muslim immigrants
in Norway:
 
Norway's Muslim immigrants attend classes on western attitudes to women
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKY600o3CXw
 
I think that the norwegians don't understand correctly what is
arab and muslim countries and don't understand arab and muslim people, and since i am a white arab , i invite to read my following proverbs and thoughts so that to understand more arabs and muslims:
 
More of my philosophy about humans animal instincts..
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that humans are behaving like inferior animals since they are also guided by there "tendencies" of there animal instincts that want to be too much individualistic or hedonistic or to want beautiful womens or need to make much more sex with beautiful womens etc. but i think that the right way is that they have to love and want to be morality and order, so it is by logical analogy like my following proverb:
 
"There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality
and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be
confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand
the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how
to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a
fool by lack of wisdom "
 
The appearance of a reality in my proverb above is by logical analogy like the tendencies brought by animal instincts of humans that make us not walk in or take the right path, so we have to educate correctly humans and to make them love and want to be morality and order.
 
And i think i am a wise type of person and here my other proverb about the wise man:
 
"A wise man is by "logical" analogy like the person that knows how to
prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one that
knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized global
world from the people."
 
And Here is all my other new proverbs that i have invented fast:
 
"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."
 
Here is my new proverb:
 
"When you are still organized like human animals you will have the strong tendency to want to marry with a beautiful women, but when you are critical thinking you have to ask yourself if all of us have to marry a beautiful women. So when you are critical thinking you have to think systemically about order"
 
Here is my other new proverb:
 
There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people by also learning them a good and efficient
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 06 03:30PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
More of may philosophy about beauty and about human smartness..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and as you have just noticed
i have just explained more the basis of my philosophy(read it below)
and now i will ask two philosophical questions and they are the following:
 
Are humans smarter than other animals?
 
And does universal beauty exists ?
 
So i will answer the first philosophical question by saying the following:
 
So i will start it by inviting you to read carefully the following webpage from a Senior Consultant (and former Editor-in-Chief and Publishing Director) of New Scientist and Author of After the Ice:
 
Why are humans smarter than other animals?
 
https://www.edge.org/response-detail/12021
 
So as you are noticing he is saying the following:

 
--
"The idea of human superiority should have died when Darwin came on the scene.
Unfortunately, the full implications of what he said have been difficult to take in: there is no Great Chain of Being, no higher and no lower. All creatures have adapted effectively to their own environments in their own way. Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy among many others, not the top of a long ladder. It took a surprisingly long time for scientists to grasp this. For decades, comparative psychologists tried to work out the learning abilities of different species so that they could be arranged on a single scale. Animal equivalents of intelligence tests were used and people seriously asked whether fish were smarter than birds. It took the new science of ethology, created by Nobel-prize winners Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch, to show that each species had the abilities it needed for its own lifestyle and they could not be not arranged on a universal scale. Human smartness is no smarter than anyone else's smartness. The question should have died for good."
--

 
So i think i am smart and say that the above webpage is not so smart, because the logical reasoning defect is that he is first saying the following:

 
"Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy"

 
This is the first logical defect, since he is like using boolean logic by saying that human smartness is only a particular survival strategy, and this is not correct logical reasoning, because we have like to be fuzzy logic and say that not all humans are using smartness for only survival, since we are not like animals, since we have not to think it only societally, but we can also say there is a great proportion of humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition than only survival. So now we can say with human smartness (and measure it with human smartness) that the humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition have a much superior smartness than animals, since we can measure it with human smartness, and here is the definition of surviving in the dictionary:

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/survive
 
So as you are noticing that survival is only to remain alive, so i am logical in my thoughts above.
 
The second logical defect of the above webpage is the following:
 
Notice that the above webpage that he is saying the following:
 
"Strangley enough, even evolutionary biologists still get caught up with the notion that humans stand at the apex of existence. There are endless books from evolutionary biologists speculating on the reasons why humans evolved such wonderful big brains, but a complete absence of those which ask if a big brains is a really useful organ to have. The evidence is far from persuasive. If you look at a wide range of organisms, those with bigger brains are generally no more successful than those with smaller brains — hey go extinct just as fast."
 
So i think that the above webpage is not right.
 
So notice again that he is saying that the brain must be successful in survival, and this is not correct reasoning, since as i said above smartness is not only about survival, since we have to measure it with our smartness and notice that from also my above thoughts that we can be humans that are much more smart than animals even if we go extinct.
 
So the important thing to notice in my above logical reasoning , is that you have to measure smartness with smartness, it is the same as my following logical proof about: Is beauty universal ? , here it is , read it carefully:
 
I will make you understand with smartness what about the following webpage:

Look at the following webpage from BBC:
 
The myth of universal beauty

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150622-the-myth-of-universal-beauty

So notice in the above webpage that it is saying the following about beauty:

"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"

So you have to understand that the above webpage from BBC is not smart, i will make you understand with smartness that beauty is universal, so if we take the following sentence of the above webpage:

"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"

So you have to put it in the context of the above webpage, and understand that the way of thinking of the webpage from BBC is not smart, because it is saying that since in the above sentence starvation is a risk , so heavier weight can be more attractive, but this can be heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes, so it makes a conclusion that universal beauty is not universal, but this is not smart because we have not to measure beautifulness with only our eyes and say that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is not beautiful, because we have to measure it with smartness and say that smartness says that in the above sentence that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is beautiful for smartness because starvation is a risk, so then with smartness we can say that beauty is universal. So we have to know that that the system of reference of measure is very important, by logical analogy we can say that measuring beautifulness with the eyes is like measuring individual smartness with only genetics, but measuring beautifulness with both the eyes and smartness is like measuring individual smartness with both the genetical and the cultural.

More of my philosophy about the problems of our humanity..
 
I think the Climate crisis that is a term describing global warming and climate change will be solved by using science and technology and i have posted about the new technologies that will be used to solve it, and i think we can fix capitalism using some reforms and it is not so difficult, but there is some problems that remain and they are the following:
 
As you have noticed(read below), the global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems, so this global average ecological footprint is growing more and more,
so economic growth can be separated from unsustainable resource consumption and harmful pollution. It is what our humanity has to do by
also using science and technology.
 
Some benchmarks for the year 2014:
 
The global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems.
 
A French person needs 4.7 gha to maintain his standard of living. If all humans consumed as much as a Frenchman, we would need 2.79 planets;
 
An American needs 8.37 gha for his consumption. If all humans consumed like an American, we would need 4.97 planets;
 
A Brazilian has an ecological footprint of 3.08 hag (1.83 planet);
 
A Chinese has a footprint of 3.71 hag (2.21 planets);
 
An Indian has a footprint of 1.12 hag (0.67 planet).
 
a Haitian has a footprint of 0.67 hag (0.4 planet).
 
 
And the other problem that remains is the following:
 
Look at the following video to understand it:
 
Global Junk Food: How the Western Food Industry is Making Poor Countries Fat
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEJwbGBrXfk
 
 
Yet more of my philosophy about capitalism..
 
 
I just written the following:
 
---
 
More philosophy about why raising taxes destroys the economy and more..
 
 
I invite you to look at the following interesting video:
 
Why raising taxes destroys the economy
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChpnX44_Ns
 
So i think you are understanding more that raising taxes destroys economy, so there remains an important thing and it is that we have to
fix capitalism in a smart way by more-effective regulation and not by raising taxes, since there remain the following problem, read about it here:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
---
 
 
So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:
 
How to Improve Capitalism
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU
 
So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and national pension funds representative of the long term collective interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to improve capitalism" so that to understand more.
 
More of my philosophy about relative and absolute measuring..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask
a philosophical question of:
 
How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?
 
I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:
 
More of my philosophy about my philosophy..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i have just looked
at the following video about Hedonism, i invite you to look at it:
 
Why Hedonism Fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
But i think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about arabs and muslims in western countries..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I invite you to look at this interesting video about muslim immigrants
in Norway:
 
Norway's Muslim immigrants attend classes on western attitudes to women
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKY600o3CXw
 
I think that the norwegians don't understand correctly what is
arab and muslim countries and don't understand arab and muslim people, and since i am a white arab , i invite to read my following proverbs and thoughts so that to understand more arabs and muslims:
 
More of my philosophy about humans animal instincts..
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that humans are behaving like inferior animals since they are also guided by there "tendencies" of there animal instincts that want to be too much individualistic or hedonistic or to want beautiful womens or need to make much more sex with beautiful womens etc. but i think that the right way is that they have to love and want to be morality and order, so it is by logical analogy like my following proverb:
 
"There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality
and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be
confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand
the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how
to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a
fool by lack of wisdom "
 
The appearance of a reality in my proverb above is by logical analogy like the tendencies brought by animal instincts of humans that make us not walk in or take the right path, so we have to educate correctly humans and to make them love and want to be morality and order.
 
And i think i am a wise type of person and here my other proverb about the wise man:
 
"A wise man is by "logical" analogy like the person that knows how to
prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one that
knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized global
world from the people."
 
And Here is all my other new proverbs that i have invented fast:
 
"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."
 
Here is my new proverb:
 
"When you are still organized like human animals you will have the strong tendency to want to marry with a beautiful women, but when you are critical thinking you have to ask yourself if all of us have to marry a beautiful women. So when you are critical thinking you have to think systemically about order"
 
Here is my other new proverb:
 
There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 06 02:35PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
Read again about more of my philosophy about the problems of our humanity..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think the Climate crisis that is a term describing global warming and climate change will be solved by using science and technology and i have posted about the new technologies that will be used to solve it, and i think we can fix capitalism using some reforms and it is not so difficult, but there is some problems that remain and they are the following:
 
As you have noticed(read below), the global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems, so this global average ecological footprint is growing more and more,
so economic growth can be separated from unsustainable resource consumption and harmful pollution. It is what our humanity has to do by
also using science and technology.
 
Some benchmarks for the year 2014:
 
The global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems.
 
A French person needs 4.7 gha to maintain his standard of living. If all humans consumed as much as a Frenchman, we would need 2.79 planets;
 
An American needs 8.37 gha for his consumption. If all humans consumed like an American, we would need 4.97 planets;
 
A Brazilian has an ecological footprint of 3.08 hag (1.83 planet);
 
A Chinese has a footprint of 3.71 hag (2.21 planets);
 
An Indian has a footprint of 1.12 hag (0.67 planet).
 
a Haitian has a footprint of 0.67 hag (0.4 planet).
 
 
And the other problem that remains is the following:
 
Look at the following video to understand it:
 
Global Junk Food: How the Western Food Industry is Making Poor Countries Fat
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEJwbGBrXfk
 
 
Yet more of my philosophy about capitalism..
 
 
I just written the following:
 
---
 
More philosophy about why raising taxes destroys the economy and more..
 
 
I invite you to look at the following interesting video:
 
Why raising taxes destroys the economy
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChpnX44_Ns
 
So i think you are understanding more that raising taxes destroys economy, so there remains an important thing and it is that we have to
fix capitalism in a smart way by more-effective regulation and not by raising taxes, since there remain the following problem, read about it here:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
---
 
 
So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:
 
How to Improve Capitalism
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU
 
So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and national pension funds representative of the long term collective interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to improve capitalism" so that to understand more.
 
More of my philosophy about relative and absolute measuring..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask
a philosophical question of:
 
How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?
 
I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:
 
More of my philosophy about my philosophy..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i have just looked
at the following video about Hedonism, i invite you to look at it:
 
Why Hedonism Fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
But i think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about arabs and muslims in western countries..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I invite you to look at this interesting video about muslim immigrants
in Norway:
 
Norway's Muslim immigrants attend classes on western attitudes to women
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKY600o3CXw
 
I think that the norwegians don't understand correctly what is
arab and muslim countries and don't understand arab and muslim people, and since i am a white arab , i invite to read my following proverbs and thoughts so that to understand more arabs and muslims:
 
More of my philosophy about humans animal instincts..
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that humans are behaving like inferior animals since they are also guided by there "tendencies" of there animal instincts that want to be too much individualistic or hedonistic or to want beautiful womens or need to make much more sex with beautiful womens etc. but i think that the right way is that they have to love and want to be morality and order, so it is by logical analogy like my following proverb:
 
"There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality
and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be
confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand
the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how
to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a
fool by lack of wisdom "
 
The appearance of a reality in my proverb above is by logical analogy like the tendencies brought by animal instincts of humans that make us not walk in or take the right path, so we have to educate correctly humans and to make them love and want to be morality and order.
 
And i think i am a wise type of person and here my other proverb about the wise man:
 
"A wise man is by "logical" analogy like the person that knows how to
prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one that
knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized global
world from the people."
 
And Here is all my other new proverbs that i have invented fast:
 
"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."
 
Here is my new proverb:
 
"When you are still organized like human animals you will have the strong tendency to want to marry with a beautiful women, but when you are critical thinking you have to ask yourself if all of us have to marry a beautiful women. So when you are critical thinking you have to think systemically about order"
 
Here is my other new proverb:
 
There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know how to live in harmony", so as you are noticing that it needs a good philosophy so that to avoid the mess of Israel.
 
More philosophy about the problem of western white Europeans..
 
I have looked at many videos about western white Europeans life style,
i am not speaking about north americans, and i think i have found the
problem of western white Europeans, and here it is, it is what we call
Hedonism, and i invite you to look at the following video so that to understand:
 
Why Hedonism fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
And i think that my philosophy is not Hedonism, but you have
to understand it holistically so that to understand it correctly,
so i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy so that
to understand, and here they are:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about my emancipation..
 
I am not like the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer movement and i am not like the feminist movement or such organized groups, i am alone constructing my emancipation by for example speaking and writing french and english and arabic , but speaking and writing three languages is not sufficient for me, so i have also got a Diploma in microelectronics and informatics, and i have studied operational research(it uses a lot of mathematics), and i have studied network administration and i have worked as a network administrator, and i have also worked as a software programmer consultant for many companies and i have worked as a software programmer consultant for some hospitals in USA, but it was not sufficient for me, so i have invented some softwares such as my PerlZip that looks like PkZip from PkWare and i have sold it to many companies and individuals around the world, and this was not sufficient for me, so i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented some very powerful software tools that i will sell, and i am also writing two books about software programming that i will sell, so i am alone constructing my "big" business by inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by inventing powerful software tools and by writing some important books in computer programming and i will use exponential thinking and exponential growth of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.
 
You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:
 
Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k
 
More of my philosophy about money..
 
I think i am smart, and what do i think about money ?
 
Here is my thoughts of my philosophy and my other proverb about it:
 
More philosophy about adaptation..
 
As you have just noticed i have just written a proverb about adaptation
by saying: "You have to master the tools of adaptation", notice
that we can say: "the tools for adaptation" or "the tool of adaptation",
read in the following dictionary of psychology, and you will notice that it is saying the "tools of intellectual adaptation", read here to notice it:
 
https://dictionary.apa.org/tools-of-intellectual-adaptation
 
So this proves that the saying of my proverb is correct, here is
my just new proverb and notice it:
 
"You have to master the tools of adaptation, such as having
a good education with a good education system, since getting
rich quickly is not the wise thing to do, since mastering the
tools of adaptation like having a good education will allow
you to get rich and will allow you to keep you rich."
 
More of my philosophy about Liberty and emancipation..
 
Now i want to talk about "emancipation", so i think you already know the emancipation that comes from the feminist ideas, but how do you think i am doing it ? i am not thinking about sexual emancipation because sex is an inferior thing for me and read below how i am explaining it , so the
way that i am doing it is that i am seeking emancipation by using exponential growth of capitalism and exponential thinking, i am not like the feminist movement, i am not like a group, i am alone constructing my "big" business by inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by inventing powerful software tools and i will use exponential thinking and exponential growth of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.
 
More of my philosophy about dignity..
 
I want you to understand more my way of doing, i am for example
writing and posting my poems of Love and my thoughts of my philosophy in front of you since i am constructing "confidence" and "order", and this confidence and order for me is like the basis of universal Love,
since when you take a look at someone and you are confident with his
actions and he is also the right order, then this can easily become Love, so i am of the ones that are convinced that we have to be this kind of dignity that brings the universal Love, also i am working on other of my software projects, for example i am actually writing two important books about software programming and about my scalable algorithms and algorithms that i will sell, also i will sell some of my powerful software tools that i have invented and i think all this will permit me to become rich, and as soon as i will become rich i will also help the poor and needy people with my money, since being charity with the poor and needy people is an important thing for me.
 
More precision and more philosophy about capitalism..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am understanding more, since i think that capitalism
is not savagery, since i think it only needs some reforms, so when
you look at capitalism, it permits also the exponential progress
of our humanity that is powerful, so i think that we have not
to be pessimistic about capitalism, since i think that we don't need
a violent revolution but we need the following reforms:
 
I invite you to read the following interesting article:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
So as you notice that the above interesting article says that so
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 06 02:30PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about the problems of our humanity..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think the Climate crisis that is a term describing global warming and climate change will be solved by using science and technology and i have posted about the new technologies that will be used to solve it, and i think we can fix capitalism using some reforms and it is not so difficult, but there is some problems that remain are they are the following:
 
As you have noticed(read below), the global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems, so this global average ecological footprint is growing more and more,
so economic growth can be separated from unsustainable resource consumption and harmful pollution. It is what our humanity has to do by
also using science and technology.
 
Some benchmarks for the year 2014:
 
The global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological footprint brings problems.
 
A French person needs 4.7 gha to maintain his standard of living. If all humans consumed as much as a Frenchman, we would need 2.79 planets;
 
An American needs 8.37 gha for his consumption. If all humans consumed like an American, we would need 4.97 planets;
 
A Brazilian has an ecological footprint of 3.08 hag (1.83 planet);
 
A Chinese has a footprint of 3.71 hag (2.21 planets);
 
An Indian has a footprint of 1.12 hag (0.67 planet).
 
a Haitian has a footprint of 0.67 hag (0.4 planet).
 
 
And the other problem that remains is the following:
 
Look at the following video to understand it:
 
Global Junk Food: How the Western Food Industry is Making Poor Countries Fat
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEJwbGBrXfk
 
 
Yet more of my philosophy about capitalism..
 
 
I just written the following:
 
---
 
More philosophy about why raising taxes destroys the economy and more..
 
 
I invite you to look at the following interesting video:
 
Why raising taxes destroys the economy
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChpnX44_Ns
 
So i think you are understanding more that raising taxes destroys economy, so there remains an important thing and it is that we have to
fix capitalism in a smart way by more-effective regulation and not by raising taxes, since there remain the following problem, read about it here:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
---
 
 
So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:
 
How to Improve Capitalism
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU
 
So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and national pension funds representative of the long term collective interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to improve capitalism" so that to understand more.
 
More of my philosophy about relative and absolute measuring..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask
a philosophical question of:
 
How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?
 
I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:
 
More of my philosophy about my philosophy..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i have just looked
at the following video about Hedonism, i invite you to look at it:
 
Why Hedonism Fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
But i think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about arabs and muslims in western countries..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I invite you to look at this interesting video about muslim immigrants
in Norway:
 
Norway's Muslim immigrants attend classes on western attitudes to women
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKY600o3CXw
 
I think that the norwegians don't understand correctly what is
arab and muslim countries and don't understand arab and muslim people, and since i am a white arab , i invite to read my following proverbs and thoughts so that to understand more arabs and muslims:
 
More of my philosophy about humans animal instincts..
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that humans are behaving like inferior animals since they are also guided by there "tendencies" of there animal instincts that want to be too much individualistic or hedonistic or to want beautiful womens or need to make much more sex with beautiful womens etc. but i think that the right way is that they have to love and want to be morality and order, so it is by logical analogy like my following proverb:
 
"There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality
and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be
confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand
the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how
to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a
fool by lack of wisdom "
 
The appearance of a reality in my proverb above is by logical analogy like the tendencies brought by animal instincts of humans that make us not walk in or take the right path, so we have to educate correctly humans and to make them love and want to be morality and order.
 
And i think i am a wise type of person and here my other proverb about the wise man:
 
"A wise man is by "logical" analogy like the person that knows how to
prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one that
knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized global
world from the people."
 
And Here is all my other new proverbs that i have invented fast:
 
"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."
 
Here is my new proverb:
 
"When you are still organized like human animals you will have the strong tendency to want to marry with a beautiful women, but when you are critical thinking you have to ask yourself if all of us have to marry a beautiful women. So when you are critical thinking you have to think systemically about order"
 
Here is my other new proverb:
 
There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know how to live in harmony", so as you are noticing that it needs a good philosophy so that to avoid the mess of Israel.
 
More philosophy about the problem of western white Europeans..
 
I have looked at many videos about western white Europeans life style,
i am not speaking about north americans, and i think i have found the
problem of western white Europeans, and here it is, it is what we call
Hedonism, and i invite you to look at the following video so that to understand:
 
Why Hedonism fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
And i think that my philosophy is not Hedonism, but you have
to understand it holistically so that to understand it correctly,
so i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy so that
to understand, and here they are:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about my emancipation..
 
I am not like the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer movement and i am not like the feminist movement or such organized groups, i am alone constructing my emancipation by for example speaking and writing french and english and arabic , but speaking and writing three languages is not sufficient for me, so i have also got a Diploma in microelectronics and informatics, and i have studied operational research(it uses a lot of mathematics), and i have studied network administration and i have worked as a network administrator, and i have also worked as a software programmer consultant for many companies and i have worked as a software programmer consultant for some hospitals in USA, but it was not sufficient for me, so i have invented some softwares such as my PerlZip that looks like PkZip from PkWare and i have sold it to many companies and individuals around the world, and this was not sufficient for me, so i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented some very powerful software tools that i will sell, and i am also writing two books about software programming that i will sell, so i am alone constructing my "big" business by inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by inventing powerful software tools and by writing some important books in computer programming and i will use exponential thinking and exponential growth of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.
 
You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:
 
Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k
 
More of my philosophy about money..
 
I think i am smart, and what do i think about money ?
 
Here is my thoughts of my philosophy and my other proverb about it:
 
More philosophy about adaptation..
 
As you have just noticed i have just written a proverb about adaptation
by saying: "You have to master the tools of adaptation", notice
that we can say: "the tools for adaptation" or "the tool of adaptation",
read in the following dictionary of psychology, and you will notice that it is saying the "tools of intellectual adaptation", read here to notice it:
 
https://dictionary.apa.org/tools-of-intellectual-adaptation
 
So this proves that the saying of my proverb is correct, here is
my just new proverb and notice it:
 
"You have to master the tools of adaptation, such as having
a good education with a good education system, since getting
rich quickly is not the wise thing to do, since mastering the
tools of adaptation like having a good education will allow
you to get rich and will allow you to keep you rich."
 
More of my philosophy about Liberty and emancipation..
 
Now i want to talk about "emancipation", so i think you already know the emancipation that comes from the feminist ideas, but how do you think i am doing it ? i am not thinking about sexual emancipation because sex is an inferior thing for me and read below how i am explaining it , so the
way that i am doing it is that i am seeking emancipation by using exponential growth of capitalism and exponential thinking, i am not like the feminist movement, i am not like a group, i am alone constructing my "big" business by inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by inventing powerful software tools and i will use exponential thinking and exponential growth of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.
 
More of my philosophy about dignity..
 
I want you to understand more my way of doing, i am for example
writing and posting my poems of Love and my thoughts of my philosophy in front of you since i am constructing "confidence" and "order", and this confidence and order for me is like the basis of universal Love,
since when you take a look at someone and you are confident with his
actions and he is also the right order, then this can easily become Love, so i am of the ones that are convinced that we have to be this kind of dignity that brings the universal Love, also i am working on other of my software projects, for example i am actually writing two important books about software programming and about my scalable algorithms and algorithms that i will sell, also i will sell some of my powerful software tools that i have invented and i think all this will permit me to become rich, and as soon as i will become rich i will also help the poor and needy people with my money, since being charity with the poor and needy people is an important thing for me.
 
More precision and more philosophy about capitalism..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am understanding more, since i think that capitalism
is not savagery, since i think it only needs some reforms, so when
you look at capitalism, it permits also the exponential progress
of our humanity that is powerful, so i think that we have not
to be pessimistic about capitalism, since i think that we don't need
a violent revolution but we need the following reforms:
 
I invite you to read the following interesting article:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
So as you notice that the above interesting article says that so that to fix
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 06 01:17PM -0700

Hello,
 
 
Yet more of my philosophy about capitalism..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I just written the following:
 
---
 
More philosophy about why raising taxes destroys the economy and more..
 
 
I invite you to look at the following interesting video:
 
Why raising taxes destroys the economy
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChpnX44_Ns
 
So i think you are understanding more that raising taxes destroys economy, so there remains an important thing and it is that we have to
fix capitalism in a smart way by more-effective regulation and not by raising taxes, since there remain the following problem, read about it here:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
---
 
 
So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:
 
How to Improve Capitalism
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU
 
So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and national pension funds representative of the long term collective interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to improve capitalism" so that to understand more.
 
More of my philosophy about relative and absolute measuring..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask
a philosophical question of:
 
How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?
 
I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:
 
More of my philosophy about my philosophy..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i have just looked
at the following video about Hedonism, i invite you to look at it:
 
Why Hedonism Fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
But i think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about arabs and muslims in western countries..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I invite you to look at this interesting video about muslim immigrants
in Norway:
 
Norway's Muslim immigrants attend classes on western attitudes to women
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKY600o3CXw
 
I think that the norwegians don't understand correctly what is
arab and muslim countries and don't understand arab and muslim people, and since i am a white arab , i invite to read my following proverbs and thoughts so that to understand more arabs and muslims:
 
More of my philosophy about humans animal instincts..
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that humans are behaving like inferior animals since they are also guided by there "tendencies" of there animal instincts that want to be too much individualistic or hedonistic or to want beautiful womens or need to make much more sex with beautiful womens etc. but i think that the right way is that they have to love and want to be morality and order, so it is by logical analogy like my following proverb:
 
"There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality
and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be
confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand
the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how
to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a
fool by lack of wisdom "
 
The appearance of a reality in my proverb above is by logical analogy like the tendencies brought by animal instincts of humans that make us not walk in or take the right path, so we have to educate correctly humans and to make them love and want to be morality and order.
 
And i think i am a wise type of person and here my other proverb about the wise man:
 
"A wise man is by "logical" analogy like the person that knows how to
prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one that
knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized global
world from the people."
 
And Here is all my other new proverbs that i have invented fast:
 
"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."
 
Here is my new proverb:
 
"When you are still organized like human animals you will have the strong tendency to want to marry with a beautiful women, but when you are critical thinking you have to ask yourself if all of us have to marry a beautiful women. So when you are critical thinking you have to think systemically about order"
 
Here is my other new proverb:
 
There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know how to live in harmony", so as you are noticing that it needs a good philosophy so that to avoid the mess of Israel.
 
More philosophy about the problem of western white Europeans..
 
I have looked at many videos about western white Europeans life style,
i am not speaking about north americans, and i think i have found the
problem of western white Europeans, and here it is, it is what we call
Hedonism, and i invite you to look at the following video so that to understand:
 
Why Hedonism fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
And i think that my philosophy is not Hedonism, but you have
to understand it holistically so that to understand it correctly,
so i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy so that
to understand, and here they are:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about my emancipation..
 
I am not like the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer movement and i am not like the feminist movement or such organized groups, i am alone constructing my emancipation by for example speaking and writing french and english and arabic , but speaking and writing three languages is not sufficient for me, so i have also got a Diploma in microelectronics and informatics, and i have studied operational research(it uses a lot of mathematics), and i have studied network administration and i have worked as a network administrator, and i have also worked as a software programmer consultant for many companies and i have worked as a software programmer consultant for some hospitals in USA, but it was not sufficient for me, so i have invented some softwares such as my PerlZip that looks like PkZip from PkWare and i have sold it to many companies and individuals around the world, and this was not sufficient for me, so i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented some very powerful software tools that i will sell, and i am also writing two books about software programming that i will sell, so i am alone constructing my "big" business by inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by inventing powerful software tools and by writing some important books in computer programming and i will use exponential thinking and exponential growth of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.
 
You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:
 
Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k
 
More of my philosophy about money..
 
I think i am smart, and what do i think about money ?
 
Here is my thoughts of my philosophy and my other proverb about it:
 
More philosophy about adaptation..
 
As you have just noticed i have just written a proverb about adaptation
by saying: "You have to master the tools of adaptation", notice
that we can say: "the tools for adaptation" or "the tool of adaptation",
read in the following dictionary of psychology, and you will notice that it is saying the "tools of intellectual adaptation", read here to notice it:
 
https://dictionary.apa.org/tools-of-intellectual-adaptation
 
So this proves that the saying of my proverb is correct, here is
my just new proverb and notice it:
 
"You have to master the tools of adaptation, such as having
a good education with a good education system, since getting
rich quickly is not the wise thing to do, since mastering the
tools of adaptation like having a good education will allow
you to get rich and will allow you to keep you rich."
 
More of my philosophy about Liberty and emancipation..
 
Now i want to talk about "emancipation", so i think you already know the emancipation that comes from the feminist ideas, but how do you think i am doing it ? i am not thinking about sexual emancipation because sex is an inferior thing for me and read below how i am explaining it , so the
way that i am doing it is that i am seeking emancipation by using exponential growth of capitalism and exponential thinking, i am not like the feminist movement, i am not like a group, i am alone constructing my "big" business by inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by inventing powerful software tools and i will use exponential thinking and exponential growth of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.
 
More of my philosophy about dignity..
 
I want you to understand more my way of doing, i am for example
writing and posting my poems of Love and my thoughts of my philosophy in front of you since i am constructing "confidence" and "order", and this confidence and order for me is like the basis of universal Love,
since when you take a look at someone and you are confident with his
actions and he is also the right order, then this can easily become Love, so i am of the ones that are convinced that we have to be this kind of dignity that brings the universal Love, also i am working on other of my software projects, for example i am actually writing two important books about software programming and about my scalable algorithms and algorithms that i will sell, also i will sell some of my powerful software tools that i have invented and i think all this will permit me to become rich, and as soon as i will become rich i will also help the poor and needy people with my money, since being charity with the poor and needy people is an important thing for me.
 
More precision and more philosophy about capitalism..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am understanding more, since i think that capitalism
is not savagery, since i think it only needs some reforms, so when
you look at capitalism, it permits also the exponential progress
of our humanity that is powerful, so i think that we have not
to be pessimistic about capitalism, since i think that we don't need
a violent revolution but we need the following reforms:
 
I invite you to read the following interesting article:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
So as you notice that the above interesting article says that so that to fix capitalism it needs more-effective regulation, progressive taxation, wealth taxes, or other measures.
 
More of my philosophy about our today world..
 
I am a techno-optimist and i think by looking at the exponential progress of our humanity i think that we have to be optimistic about it, also you have to read my following thoughts:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/2ws8UPouQbE
 
So as you notice my above previous thoughts in the above web link are
in accordance with the following new interesting article, and i invite you to read it carefully:
 
Life in 2050: A Glimpse at Medicine in the Future
 
https://interestingengineering.com/life-in-2050-a-glimpse-at-medicine-in-the-future
 
And there is still an important thing to say and it is that
of the intellectual taste that we have to enhance much more so that
to push the quality of products and services upward and i think it is a process that is so important, and you have to read about it here in my thoughts of my philosophy about Adam Smith economist and philosopher:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo
 
More of my philosophy about the way of how i am solving the problem of egoism and materialism..
 
I think i am a smart philosopher, you have to understand more
how i am solving the problem of egoism and materialism, so
i am showing you(read below) that egoism comes from normal
desire of being rich, since when you are not rich you are
not positive and not happy, so this causes that you are "egoistic" with
others, so then the problem becomes: How to make the not rich being happy without being rich so that to not be egoistic with others?, and this is what is explaining my philosophy, read it below:
 
More philosophy about the way of solving the problem of egoism and materialism..
 
Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 06 09:11AM -0700

Hello,
 
 
More philosophy about why raising taxes destroys the economy and more..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I invite you to look at the following interesting video:
 
Why raising taxes destroys the economy
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChpnX44_Ns
 
So i think you are understanding more that raising taxes destroys economy, so there remains an important thing and it is that we have to
fix capitalism in a smart way by more-effective regulation and not by raising taxes, since there remain the following problem, read about it here:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
More of my philosophy about relative and absolute measuring..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask
a philosophical question of:
 
How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?
 
I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:
 
More of my philosophy about my philosophy..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i have just looked
at the following video about Hedonism, i invite you to look at it:
 
Why Hedonism Fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
But i think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about arabs and muslims in western countries..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I invite you to look at this interesting video about muslim immigrants
in Norway:
 
Norway's Muslim immigrants attend classes on western attitudes to women
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKY600o3CXw
 
I think that the norwegians don't understand correctly what is
arab and muslim countries and don't understand arab and muslim people, and since i am a white arab , i invite to read my following proverbs and thoughts so that to understand more arabs and muslims:
 
More of my philosophy about humans animal instincts..
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that humans are behaving like inferior animals since they are also guided by there "tendencies" of there animal instincts that want to be too much individualistic or hedonistic or to want beautiful womens or need to make much more sex with beautiful womens etc. but i think that the right way is that they have to love and want to be morality and order, so it is by logical analogy like my following proverb:
 
"There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality
and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be
confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand
the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how
to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a
fool by lack of wisdom "
 
The appearance of a reality in my proverb above is by logical analogy like the tendencies brought by animal instincts of humans that make us not walk in or take the right path, so we have to educate correctly humans and to make them love and want to be morality and order.
 
And i think i am a wise type of person and here my other proverb about the wise man:
 
"A wise man is by "logical" analogy like the person that knows how to
prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one that
knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized global
world from the people."
 
And Here is all my other new proverbs that i have invented fast:
 
"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."
 
Here is my new proverb:
 
"When you are still organized like human animals you will have the strong tendency to want to marry with a beautiful women, but when you are critical thinking you have to ask yourself if all of us have to marry a beautiful women. So when you are critical thinking you have to think systemically about order"
 
Here is my other new proverb:
 
There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know how to live in harmony", so as you are noticing that it needs a good philosophy so that to avoid the mess of Israel.
 
More philosophy about the problem of western white Europeans..
 
I have looked at many videos about western white Europeans life style,
i am not speaking about north americans, and i think i have found the
problem of western white Europeans, and here it is, it is what we call
Hedonism, and i invite you to look at the following video so that to understand:
 
Why Hedonism fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
And i think that my philosophy is not Hedonism, but you have
to understand it holistically so that to understand it correctly,
so i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy so that
to understand, and here they are:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about my emancipation..
 
I am not like the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer movement and i am not like the feminist movement or such organized groups, i am alone constructing my emancipation by for example speaking and writing french and english and arabic , but speaking and writing three languages is not sufficient for me, so i have also got a Diploma in microelectronics and informatics, and i have studied operational research(it uses a lot of mathematics), and i have studied network administration and i have worked as a network administrator, and i have also worked as a software programmer consultant for many companies and i have worked as a software programmer consultant for some hospitals in USA, but it was not sufficient for me, so i have invented some softwares such as my PerlZip that looks like PkZip from PkWare and i have sold it to many companies and individuals around the world, and this was not sufficient for me, so i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented some very powerful software tools that i will sell, and i am also writing two books about software programming that i will sell, so i am alone constructing my "big" business by inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by inventing powerful software tools and by writing some important books in computer programming and i will use exponential thinking and exponential growth of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.
 
You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:
 
Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k
 
More of my philosophy about money..
 
I think i am smart, and what do i think about money ?
 
Here is my thoughts of my philosophy and my other proverb about it:
 
More philosophy about adaptation..
 
As you have just noticed i have just written a proverb about adaptation
by saying: "You have to master the tools of adaptation", notice
that we can say: "the tools for adaptation" or "the tool of adaptation",
read in the following dictionary of psychology, and you will notice that it is saying the "tools of intellectual adaptation", read here to notice it:
 
https://dictionary.apa.org/tools-of-intellectual-adaptation
 
So this proves that the saying of my proverb is correct, here is
my just new proverb and notice it:
 
"You have to master the tools of adaptation, such as having
a good education with a good education system, since getting
rich quickly is not the wise thing to do, since mastering the
tools of adaptation like having a good education will allow
you to get rich and will allow you to keep you rich."
 
More of my philosophy about Liberty and emancipation..
 
Now i want to talk about "emancipation", so i think you already know the emancipation that comes from the feminist ideas, but how do you think i am doing it ? i am not thinking about sexual emancipation because sex is an inferior thing for me and read below how i am explaining it , so the
way that i am doing it is that i am seeking emancipation by using exponential growth of capitalism and exponential thinking, i am not like the feminist movement, i am not like a group, i am alone constructing my "big" business by inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by inventing powerful software tools and i will use exponential thinking and exponential growth of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.
 
More of my philosophy about dignity..
 
I want you to understand more my way of doing, i am for example
writing and posting my poems of Love and my thoughts of my philosophy in front of you since i am constructing "confidence" and "order", and this confidence and order for me is like the basis of universal Love,
since when you take a look at someone and you are confident with his
actions and he is also the right order, then this can easily become Love, so i am of the ones that are convinced that we have to be this kind of dignity that brings the universal Love, also i am working on other of my software projects, for example i am actually writing two important books about software programming and about my scalable algorithms and algorithms that i will sell, also i will sell some of my powerful software tools that i have invented and i think all this will permit me to become rich, and as soon as i will become rich i will also help the poor and needy people with my money, since being charity with the poor and needy people is an important thing for me.
 
More precision and more philosophy about capitalism..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am understanding more, since i think that capitalism
is not savagery, since i think it only needs some reforms, so when
you look at capitalism, it permits also the exponential progress
of our humanity that is powerful, so i think that we have not
to be pessimistic about capitalism, since i think that we don't need
a violent revolution but we need the following reforms:
 
I invite you to read the following interesting article:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
So as you notice that the above interesting article says that so that to fix capitalism it needs more-effective regulation, progressive taxation, wealth taxes, or other measures.
 
More of my philosophy about our today world..
 
I am a techno-optimist and i think by looking at the exponential progress of our humanity i think that we have to be optimistic about it, also you have to read my following thoughts:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/2ws8UPouQbE
 
So as you notice my above previous thoughts in the above web link are
in accordance with the following new interesting article, and i invite you to read it carefully:
 
Life in 2050: A Glimpse at Medicine in the Future
 
https://interestingengineering.com/life-in-2050-a-glimpse-at-medicine-in-the-future
 
And there is still an important thing to say and it is that
of the intellectual taste that we have to enhance much more so that
to push the quality of products and services upward and i think it is a process that is so important, and you have to read about it here in my thoughts of my philosophy about Adam Smith economist and philosopher:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo
 
More of my philosophy about the way of how i am solving the problem of egoism and materialism..
 
I think i am a smart philosopher, you have to understand more
how i am solving the problem of egoism and materialism, so
i am showing you(read below) that egoism comes from normal
desire of being rich, since when you are not rich you are
not positive and not happy, so this causes that you are "egoistic" with
others, so then the problem becomes: How to make the not rich being happy without being rich so that to not be egoistic with others?, and this is what is explaining my philosophy, read it below:
 
More philosophy about the way of solving the problem of egoism and materialism..
 
Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k
 
I have just written the following:
 
---
 
More philosophy about the human desire and human egoism..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that
the problem comes not only from egoism but from the human "desire",
but here again we have to logically "distinguish", since we can
ask a philosophical question of what is the normal desire ?
so you can for example say that the constraints of human life
require from us to be rich so that to be happy, so the normal desire becomes the desire of being rich, so this kind of normal desire makes us
egoist, so as you are noticing this becomes a
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jul 06 08:13AM -0700

Hello,
 
 
More of my philosophy about relative and absolute measuring..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask
a philosophical question of:
 
How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?
 
I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd", and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy, since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:
 
More of my philosophy about my philosophy..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i have just looked
at the following video about Hedonism, i invite you to look at it:
 
Why Hedonism Fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
But i think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about arabs and muslims in western countries..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I invite you to look at this interesting video about muslim immigrants
in Norway:
 
Norway's Muslim immigrants attend classes on western attitudes to women
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKY600o3CXw
 
I think that the norwegians don't understand correctly what is
arab and muslim countries and don't understand arab and muslim people, and since i am a white arab , i invite to read my following proverbs and thoughts so that to understand more arabs and muslims:
 
More of my philosophy about humans animal instincts..
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that humans are behaving like inferior animals since they are also guided by there "tendencies" of there animal instincts that want to be too much individualistic or hedonistic or to want beautiful womens or need to make much more sex with beautiful womens etc. but i think that the right way is that they have to love and want to be morality and order, so it is by logical analogy like my following proverb:
 
"There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality
and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be
confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand
the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how
to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a
fool by lack of wisdom "
 
The appearance of a reality in my proverb above is by logical analogy like the tendencies brought by animal instincts of humans that make us not walk in or take the right path, so we have to educate correctly humans and to make them love and want to be morality and order.
 
And i think i am a wise type of person and here my other proverb about the wise man:
 
"A wise man is by "logical" analogy like the person that knows how to
prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one that
knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized global
world from the people."
 
And Here is all my other new proverbs that i have invented fast:
 
"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."
 
Here is my new proverb:
 
"When you are still organized like human animals you will have the strong tendency to want to marry with a beautiful women, but when you are critical thinking you have to ask yourself if all of us have to marry a beautiful women. So when you are critical thinking you have to think systemically about order"
 
Here is my other new proverb:
 
There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know how to live in harmony", so as you are noticing that it needs a good philosophy so that to avoid the mess of Israel.
 
More philosophy about the problem of western white Europeans..
 
I have looked at many videos about western white Europeans life style,
i am not speaking about north americans, and i think i have found the
problem of western white Europeans, and here it is, it is what we call
Hedonism, and i invite you to look at the following video so that to understand:
 
Why Hedonism fails
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM
 
And i think that my philosophy is not Hedonism, but you have
to understand it holistically so that to understand it correctly,
so i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy so that
to understand, and here they are:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs
 
More of my philosophy about my emancipation..
 
I am not like the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer movement and i am not like the feminist movement or such organized groups, i am alone constructing my emancipation by for example speaking and writing french and english and arabic , but speaking and writing three languages is not sufficient for me, so i have also got a Diploma in microelectronics and informatics, and i have studied operational research(it uses a lot of mathematics), and i have studied network administration and i have worked as a network administrator, and i have also worked as a software programmer consultant for many companies and i have worked as a software programmer consultant for some hospitals in USA, but it was not sufficient for me, so i have invented some softwares such as my PerlZip that looks like PkZip from PkWare and i have sold it to many companies and individuals around the world, and this was not sufficient for me, so i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented some very powerful software tools that i will sell, and i am also writing two books about software programming that i will sell, so i am alone constructing my "big" business by inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by inventing powerful software tools and by writing some important books in computer programming and i will use exponential thinking and exponential growth of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.
 
You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:
 
Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k
 
More of my philosophy about money..
 
I think i am smart, and what do i think about money ?
 
Here is my thoughts of my philosophy and my other proverb about it:
 
More philosophy about adaptation..
 
As you have just noticed i have just written a proverb about adaptation
by saying: "You have to master the tools of adaptation", notice
that we can say: "the tools for adaptation" or "the tool of adaptation",
read in the following dictionary of psychology, and you will notice that it is saying the "tools of intellectual adaptation", read here to notice it:
 
https://dictionary.apa.org/tools-of-intellectual-adaptation
 
So this proves that the saying of my proverb is correct, here is
my just new proverb and notice it:
 
"You have to master the tools of adaptation, such as having
a good education with a good education system, since getting
rich quickly is not the wise thing to do, since mastering the
tools of adaptation like having a good education will allow
you to get rich and will allow you to keep you rich."
 
More of my philosophy about Liberty and emancipation..
 
Now i want to talk about "emancipation", so i think you already know the emancipation that comes from the feminist ideas, but how do you think i am doing it ? i am not thinking about sexual emancipation because sex is an inferior thing for me and read below how i am explaining it , so the
way that i am doing it is that i am seeking emancipation by using exponential growth of capitalism and exponential thinking, i am not like the feminist movement, i am not like a group, i am alone constructing my "big" business by inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by inventing powerful software tools and i will use exponential thinking and exponential growth of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.
 
More of my philosophy about dignity..
 
I want you to understand more my way of doing, i am for example
writing and posting my poems of Love and my thoughts of my philosophy in front of you since i am constructing "confidence" and "order", and this confidence and order for me is like the basis of universal Love,
since when you take a look at someone and you are confident with his
actions and he is also the right order, then this can easily become Love, so i am of the ones that are convinced that we have to be this kind of dignity that brings the universal Love, also i am working on other of my software projects, for example i am actually writing two important books about software programming and about my scalable algorithms and algorithms that i will sell, also i will sell some of my powerful software tools that i have invented and i think all this will permit me to become rich, and as soon as i will become rich i will also help the poor and needy people with my money, since being charity with the poor and needy people is an important thing for me.
 
More precision and more philosophy about capitalism..
 
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
I think i am understanding more, since i think that capitalism
is not savagery, since i think it only needs some reforms, so when
you look at capitalism, it permits also the exponential progress
of our humanity that is powerful, so i think that we have not
to be pessimistic about capitalism, since i think that we don't need
a violent revolution but we need the following reforms:
 
I invite you to read the following interesting article:
 
One last chance to fix capitalism
 
https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism
 
So as you notice that the above interesting article says that so that to fix capitalism it needs more-effective regulation, progressive taxation, wealth taxes, or other measures.
 
More of my philosophy about our today world..
 
I am a techno-optimist and i think by looking at the exponential progress of our humanity i think that we have to be optimistic about it, also you have to read my following thoughts:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/2ws8UPouQbE
 
So as you notice my above previous thoughts in the above web link are
in accordance with the following new interesting article, and i invite you to read it carefully:
 
Life in 2050: A Glimpse at Medicine in the Future
 
https://interestingengineering.com/life-in-2050-a-glimpse-at-medicine-in-the-future
 
And there is still an important thing to say and it is that
of the intellectual taste that we have to enhance much more so that
to push the quality of products and services upward and i think it is a process that is so important, and you have to read about it here in my thoughts of my philosophy about Adam Smith economist and philosopher:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo
 
More of my philosophy about the way of how i am solving the problem of egoism and materialism..
 
I think i am a smart philosopher, you have to understand more
how i am solving the problem of egoism and materialism, so
i am showing you(read below) that egoism comes from normal
desire of being rich, since when you are not rich you are
not positive and not happy, so this causes that you are "egoistic" with
others, so then the problem becomes: How to make the not rich being happy without being rich so that to not be egoistic with others?, and this is what is explaining my philosophy, read it below:
 
More philosophy about the way of solving the problem of egoism and materialism..
 
Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k
 
I have just written the following:
 
---
 
More philosophy about the human desire and human egoism..
 
I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that
the problem comes not only from egoism but from the human "desire",
but here again we have to logically "distinguish", since we can
ask a philosophical question of what is the normal desire ?
so you can for example say that the constraints of human life
require from us to be rich so that to be happy, so the normal desire becomes the desire of being rich, so this kind of normal desire makes us
egoist, so as you are noticing this becomes a psychologically normal behavior, so then as you are noticing that we have to be smart and think more, so how can we solve the problem ? i think that i am a smart philosopher and i have solved the problem by bringing my thoughts of my philosophy, and you can read how i have solved the problem here in my thoughts of my philosophy, read it carefully here:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
 
And i have talked above about human desire and about egoism, and to understand more about human egoism, i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy about Adam Smith economist and
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)