Tuesday, October 24, 2017

Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 21 updates in 2 topics

woodbrian77@gmail.com: Oct 23 05:49PM -0700

On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 4:16:45 PM UTC-5, Florian Weimer wrote:
 
> I find that hard to believe. SaaS goes away quickly (and often in an
> automated fashion) once you cannot pay the bills due to cashflow
> issues.
 
Some SaaS, including the C++ Middleware Writer, is free.
 
 
> If you run your own stuff, there's much more inertia, which
> can be a saving grace under such circumstances.
 
I make an operating system my own by selecting it and
configuring it. There may be some similarity with SaaS.
 
 
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises
http://webEbenezer.net
Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>: Oct 23 10:07PM -0400

On 10/23/2017 5:16 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> automated fashion) once you cannot pay the bills due to cashflow
> issues. If you run your own stuff, there's much more inertia, which
> can be a saving grace under such circumstances.
 
And what happens when the company who's cloud-based application and/or
storage you are using goes under, gets bought out by someone not
interested in supporting the service or whatever?
 
Probably not going to happen to Microsoft, but not everyone is huge.
 
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com>: Oct 24 11:15AM +0800

AT Tuesday 24 October 2017 10:07, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
 
> storage you are using goes under, gets bought out by someone not
> interested in supporting the service or whatever?
 
> Probably not going to happen to Microsoft, but not everyone is huge.
 
Even that might not help you. Big companies sometimes decide in one day to
kill a business sector.
 
--
Reinhardt
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>: Oct 23 10:12AM +0200

On 20/10/17 05:29, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
 
 
> So far so good wrt age: 40. Started off with basic at a young age, < 10,
> less than 6 on an Atari! Basic and PILOT cartridges, and a tape device
> to save my programs. Created many experiments. ;^)
 
I am a few years older than you (45) - I didn't have a chance to start
programming (in Basic) until I was about 8 or 9. But at 6 I had used a
computer (a Commodore Pet) and had decided to be a programmer or a
computer hardware designer when I grew up.
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Oct 24 12:34PM

>On Saturday, October 21, 2017 at 10:24:22 AM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
 
>Please don't swear here.
 
Shut the fuck up, brian.
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Oct 24 07:52AM -0700

On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 8:34:58 AM UTC-4, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> >On Saturday, October 21, 2017 at 10:24:22 AM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >Please don't swear here.
 
> Shut the .. up, brian.
 
Scott, do you want to live in a world where people treat other people
with the level of disrespect you show people at times?
 
I don't know what's happened to you in your life, but there are far
better, far more congenial, far more loving and helpful ways to be
to your fellow man.
 
Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Oct 24 05:12PM


>> Shut the .. up, brian.
 
>Scott, do you want to live in a world where people treat other people
>with the level of disrespect you show people at times?
 
Neither of you have earned respect.
 
Or rather, you've earned disrepect by your behavior.
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Oct 24 10:17AM -0700

On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 1:13:00 PM UTC-4, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> >with the level of disrespect you show people at times?
 
> Neither of you have earned respect.
 
> Or rather, you've earned disrepect by your behavior.
 
It's at those times, when confronted with those scenarios in life,
that you reveal your character, Scott.
 
Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin
woodbrian77@gmail.com: Oct 24 11:30AM -0700

On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 12:18:10 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
 
Rick,
 
I don't think what you are doing in this thread is helpful.
 
Brian
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Oct 24 11:35AM -0700

> On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 12:18:10 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> Rick, I don't think what you are doing in this thread is helpful.
 
What am I doing in this thread, Brian?
 
Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin
Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com>: Oct 24 12:48PM -0700

On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 1:18:10 PM UTC-4, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
 
> It's at those times, when confronted with those scenarios in life,
> that you reveal your character, Scott.
 
"Judge not, lest ye be judged"
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Oct 24 01:28PM -0700

On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 3:48:11 PM UTC-4, Daniel wrote:
 
> > It's at those times, when confronted with those scenarios in life,
> > that you reveal your character, Scott.
 
> "Judge not, lest ye be judged"
 
How is what I said judgment, Daniel? How is what anything I've
written in this thread judgment?
 
Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin
Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>: Oct 25 09:49AM +1300

On 10/25/17 09:28 AM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
 
>> "Judge not, lest ye be judged"
 
> How is what I said judgment, Daniel? How is what anything I've
> written in this thread judgment?
 
How is anything you have written topical?
 
--
Ian
"Öö Tiib" <ootiib@hot.ee>: Oct 24 02:00PM -0700

On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 17:52:53 UTC+3, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
 
> I don't know what's happened to you in your life, but there are far
> better, far more congenial, far more loving and helpful ways to be
> to your fellow man.
 
It is even more general. Every person has likely better things to do
with their lives than to display disrespect towards you or Brian or
to explain source of such disrespect. "Better" was meant in sense of
"more beneficial" for pursuing whatever goals they might have.
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Oct 24 02:10PM -0700

On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 4:49:38 PM UTC-4, Ian Collins wrote:
 
> > How is what I said judgment, Daniel? How is what anything I've
> > written in this thread judgment?
 
> How is anything you have written topical?
 
This is where I come from, Ian: It is my hope that you get the answer
to that question before you are standing before God being judged for
your sin, and having it pop back into your mind and knowing only then,
in that moment, exactly how it was topical to you.
 
-----
People think they're going to skate through this world doing whatever,
and they're fine. But they are wrong. Each of us carries sin, and
each of us has an appointment with God to be judged.
 
It is only those who DO NOT HAVE sin who will not be judged, and it
is only those who have asked Jesus to forgive their sin who no longer
have sin.
 
That doesn't mean they don't sin from time to time, but that Jesus
pays the price of that sin by His love, His gift, His willingness to
save us from our sin, and the judgment and condemnation that goes
along with it.
 
Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin
Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>: Oct 24 05:44PM -0400

On 10/23/2017 11:15 PM, Reinhardt Behm wrote:
 
>> Probably not going to happen to Microsoft, but not everyone is huge.
 
> Even that might not help you. Big companies sometimes decide in one day to
> kill a business sector.
 
Very true.
 
 
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
woodbrian77@gmail.com: Oct 23 06:41PM -0700

On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 5:20:10 PM UTC-5, bitrex wrote:
> life and can't understand why someone wouldn't vote a bloviating,
> washed-up reality TV star president simply for entertainment
> value/enjoying it being upsetting to people they don't like
 
 
The Republicans I know have problems. I was glad to
be able to vote for the Constitution Party candidate in 2016.
 
 
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust.
http://webEbenezer.net
Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>: Oct 23 10:09PM -0400

On 10/23/2017 6:19 PM, bitrex wrote:
> life and can't understand why someone wouldn't vote a bloviating,
> washed-up reality TV star president simply for entertainment
> value/enjoying it being upsetting to people they don't like
 
No, the American Right is the party that believes in the rule of law and
the Constitution.
 
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net>: Oct 24 01:59AM -0400

On 10/23/2017 10:09 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> value/enjoying it being upsetting to people they don't like
 
> No, the American Right is the party that believes in the rule of law and
> the Constitution.
 
Oh. Where'd they go?
bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net>: Oct 24 02:19AM -0400


> Brian
> Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust.
> http://webEbenezer.net
 
If ~50 million Americans can say with a straight face that a rambling
geriatric former game show host is the top pick to "defend the
Constitution" then the only conclusion I can draw is that it's a
document not really worth defending.
 
Or like some revisionist historians have written that in essence the
Founding Fathers were liars and con-artists and didn't really believe in
any of the things that they were writing about, and the Constitution was
all an exercise in what we'd now call marketing or "public relations."
Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>: Oct 24 05:43PM -0400

On 10/24/2017 1:59 AM, bitrex wrote:
 
>> No, the American Right is the party that believes in the rule of law
>> and the Constitution.
 
> Oh. Where'd they go?
 
Right where they are supposed to be. The Right doesn't just ignore laws
it doesn't like.
 
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No comments: