- Still about quality - 1 Update
| Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 17 01:29PM -0400 Hello.... Read this: I am a white arab who speaks and writes english and french and arabic Still about quality As you have noticed growth in France will lower the unemployment in a significant way, but consumption is also a way in economics to lower unemployment more, but there is also another way to reduce unemployment is also to build quality products and services like in Germany to be more competitive and sell more locally and sell more globally to other countries, so I think France must also pay attention to the education sector that should become more efficient and of a better quality, because innovation and quality are dependent on it! and in being more effective in economics and education France will attract more and more smart people who innovate more and who create quality and growth, but I think that France is better "aware" today to face its challenges and I think it is able to meet them. Still on France .. I understand better the United States, and I also know how to adopt the best of the United States, you in France you have a tendency to insist too much on the fact that arabs of the Maghreb do not integrate better and that they should integrate better, but I do not agree with the method, because I am a different mentality, and I think it is necessary to bring "indirectly those arabs to integrate better, and this "indirectly" it is this entrepreneurial spirit that wants to bring the president Macron, because since the private sector of France is of 75%, and that the private sector is important, then it is necessary to educate better and correctly those arabs of France to be able for them to be more efficient and more entrepreneurial and to be able for them to create companies too, and also France has to be more positive like Macron and show those arabs of France that France is more positive, from there "indirectly" the arabs of France will want to build France and to integrate better in France. I think Macron is smart and he understands my ideas better. I said below that: "the french political party that is called FN is also more idealistim that contradicts itself with pragmatism and realism" I mean that this racial idealism of the FN, as the fact of wanting to become 100% racially European white is also more idealism that contradicts itself with pragmatism and realism. On the entrepreneurial spirit .. I think that in France you have to understand well the president Macron, Macron wants to bring and develop an entrepreneurial spirit of people of France, especially that in France the private sector is at 75% of workforce and the public sector is only 25%, in Algeria the public sector is at 35% of workforce, so we should not go through a thousand ways, president Macron knows that the pessimism of the far right party of the FN is bad, so Macron is more positive and I think we need to be more positive, because Macron knows that France is able to solve its problems in an intelligent way, I give you an example: the FN says that it's tired of arabs of France, and that people who voted FN do not want anymore arabs, but Macron understands the finesse of politics and he knows he has to be smart because immigration is good for economic growth etc. that's why Macron is more "realistic", because for him the FN is also more idealism that contradicts itself with pragmatism and realism, that's why I find Macron intelligent. I think that we have not to be pessimistic about France, because look at its growth and look at its other economic indicators: First look at the growth of France here: "Today's growth remains lower than the one that prevailed during the period 1975-2007, with a rate of 2.1% per year on average," observes Yannick L'Horty, a professor at the university. Paris-East - Marne-la-Vallée. However, it helps to increase the number of employees in the private sector, "so that unemployment will probably start to decline, at a very measured pace . " and look also at this about France: According to Bpifrance's semi-annual business survey, published on Monday, 41% of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) report recruitment difficulties, an increase of seven points over a year. This indicator has never been higher since 2002. This situation reflects the inadequacy of supply and demand for employment. The government wants to remedy this , through its Skills Investment Plan (CIP), which plans to train by the year 2022 two million low-skilled people or remote from the world of work. But, as Mr. Martin points out, this program "has not yet produced its effects" since it is still in its infancy. Read more here to notice it: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemonde.fr%2Femploi%2Farticle%2F2018%2F07%2F25%2Fle-nombre-de-chomeurs-a-augmente-de-0-1-au-second-trimestre-2018_5335727_1698637.html So i think France is on the right path, and France must also balance the budget and i think that France is capable of doing it. Also here is my other thoughts of what France can also do: I observed more closely the model of for example the French system, and I found that contrarily to England, for example the weight of the public service in France is much more than that of England, so what can we also do in France to unlock economic wrowth and reduce the rate of unemployment? i think there is another solution that is reduce the size of the state to increase public revenue too, and also "reduce" taxes, because it is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the "multiplier "tax effect": indeed, it results in an increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and employment, so it reduces unemployment. I have to be more precise about USA: I said before on my previous post that: "At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states in the crisis of year 2000. " Here is the proof, read the following: In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans, to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further. Read more here: Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/ So reread my following thoughts: About offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics.. I am a white Arab, and here is my questions and my answers about offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics, read my following thoughts: Questions: What do i think about offshoring and macroeconomics? Answer: At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states in the crisis of year 2000. Also the second lever is the Keynes tax policy: Keynes recommends using an expansionary fiscal policy in case recession: reduce taxes and increase the state. In case of inflation, he recommends doing the opposite. The other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not agree with them, because read the following: Offshoring increases demand for more workers "qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of order of about 10%, also according to some recent research the Offshoring of materials and services have both a positive and not negligible effect on productivity. When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel 2006). For proof, read the following document: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm And about immigration now: Look at this following video about: Why Does the USA Need More IMMIGRANTS? You will notice that the West "needs" immigrants because they are also good for economic "growth". But please look carefully at the following video to understand more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmRgnDrhE9o Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment