Wednesday, August 8, 2018

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 7 updates in 7 topics

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 07 04:22PM -0400

Hello....
 
Read this:
 
 
I have to be more precise:
 
I said before on my previous post that:
 
"At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states
in the crisis of year 2000. "
 
Here is the proof, read the following:
 
In 2001, when the recession hit the US economy, the Fed lowered the
federal funds rate, increasing the liquidity in the economy. The
borrowers were mainly those without jobs and income to back these loans,
to buy houses. The easy credit plus upward spiral of home prices, made
investments in high-yielding subprime mortgages increase further.
 
Read more here:
 
Reasons For The Late 2000s Financial Crisis
 
https://themarketmogul.com/reasons-for-the-late-2000s-financial-crisis/
 
So reread my following thoughts:
 
About offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics..
 
I am a white Arab, and here is my questions and my answers about
offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics, read my following thoughts:
 
Questions:
 
What do i think about offshoring and macroeconomics?
 
Answer:
 
At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states
in the crisis of year 2000.
 
Also the second lever is the Keynes tax policy:
 
Keynes recommends using an expansionary fiscal policy in case
recession: reduce taxes and increase the state. In case of inflation, he
recommends doing the opposite.
 
The other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that
the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not
agree with them, because read the following:
 
Offshoring increases demand for more workers
"qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on
productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of
order of about 10%, also according to some recent research
the Offshoring of materials and services have both a
positive and not negligible effect on productivity.
 
When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of
empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring
on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel
2006).
 
For proof, read the following document:
 
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm
 
I observed more closely the model of for example the French system,
and I found that contrarily to England, for example the weight of the
public service in France is much more than that of England, but what
disturb me the most is that this French model tends to create between 0
and 1% of economic growth which seems to me problematic because this
very low growth rate in France can not compensate for the high birth
rate that creates 150,000 new workers returning new to the job market
every year and this tends to create a high rate of unemployment and is
not able to lower the rate unemployment and this too has created a large
debt and continues to create deficits and debt, and this seems to me
problematic for France , so what to do in France to unlock growth
economic and reduce the rate of unemployment? i think there is a
solution that is reduce the size of the state to increase public revenue
too, and also "reduce" taxes, because it is agreed that a lower taxes
mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the "multiplier
"tax effect": indeed, it results in an increase in households or
corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and
therefore, indirectly, the production and employment, so it reduces
unemployment.
 
 
Read the rest of my thoughts that i have extended:
 
About populism..
 
You are noticing that we are getting more and more into populism in
some western countries..
 
But what is the cause of this populism ?
 
I think that there is some misunderstanding between Democrats
and Republicans in USA, for example Democrats know about
the problem of globalisation that is because of the low living
conditions of China and third world countries they are capable of
providing lower price products than the western countries , this causes
also many industries of western countries to move to to China and to
third world countries to be able to be competitive. But Republicans are
not understanding Democrats, because Democrats know about this problem
of globalisation and they say that USA "must" create enough high value
and high quality products like in Germany to solve a big part of the
this problem of globalisation, thus the that lower class and middle
class also has to adapt by being more skilled and more educated to be
able to be this more quality and be more competitive, this is what was
lacking the in USA, this is why Democrats are not in accordance with
republicans, because they say that USA has to be more inventive and more
educated and more skilled to be able to solve this kind of problems of
globalisation, but governance of republicans of USA is based on this
populism that is not in accordance with what Democrats want, France and
other western countries have this same problem, please read my above
writing on France and Offshoring.
 
 
And about immigration now:
 
Look at this following video about:
 
Why Does the USA Need More IMMIGRANTS?
 
You will notice that the West "needs" immigrants because they are also
good for economic "growth".
 
But please look carefully at the following video to understand more:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmRgnDrhE9o
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 07 01:37PM -0400

Hello,
 
 
About Nuclear fusion and about energy efficiency..
 
I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has
invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, so we have
to be smarter, so read my following post:
 
Memory is a negligible factor in energy efficiency, because it uses very
little power (we're for example talking less than 3 watts per stick in a
laptop). So the CPU is taking much much more energy than memory, this is
why you can rethink computing by using reversible algorithms "or" more
reversible algorithms, read about how to do it here in this paper:
 
Energy-Efficient Algorithms
 
https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08448
 
Also read the following about the programming languages energy efficiency:
 
Energy efficiency isn't just a hardware problem. Your programming
language choices can have serious effects on the efficiency of your
energy consumption. We dive deep into what makes a programming language
energy efficient.
 
As the researchers discovered, the CPU-based energy consumption always
represents the majority of the energy consumed.
 
What Pereira et. al. found wasn't entirely surprising: speed does not
always equate energy efficiency. Compiled languages like C, C++, Rust,
and Ada ranked as some of the most energy efficient languages out there.
 
Read the more here and you will notice that Java is one of the most
energy-efficient languages, Python among least energy efficient, and
Pascal and Object Pascal of FreePascal is scoring as Java on energy
efficiency:
 
https://jaxenter.com/energy-efficient-programming-languages-137264.html
 
Also RAM is still expensive and slow, relative to CPUs
 
And "memory" usage efficiency is important for mobile devices.
 
So Delphi and FreePascal compilers are also still "useful" for mobile
devices, because Delphi and FreePascal are good if you are considering
time and memory or energy and memory, and the following pascal benchmark
was done with FreePascal, and the benchmark shows that C, Go and Pascal
do rather better if you're considering languages based on time and
memory or energy and memory.
 
Read again here to notice it:
 
https://jaxenter.com/energy-efficient-programming-languages-137264.html
 
 
Also Delphi is still better for many things, and you have to get more
"technical" to understand it, this is why you have to look at this
following video about Delphi that is more technical:
 
Why are C# Developers choosing Delphi to create Mobile applications
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8ToSr4zOVQ
 
Yet we have to be more smartness..
 
I have posted before about Reversible algorithms and how they bring a
lot of energy efficiency..
 
But i have thought rapidly about that, and i think that we
have not be crazy about Reversible algorithms and rethink
computing with them, because Nuclear fusion will be here
fast, and the scientists anticipate the output of fusion energy would be
more than twice the power used to heat the plasma, achieving the
ultimate technical milestone: positive net energy from fusion, and as
you have noticed on the following webpage that i think this can be
"exponential", since the output is a positive energy and a double
of the input energy from fusion, so we can feed the output to another
input and so on and so on and get exponentially much more energy with
fusion, so no need to completly rethink computing with Reversible
algorithms, read the following to notice it:
 
Nuclear fusion on brink of being realised, say MIT scientists
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/mar/09/nuclear-fusion-on-brink-of-being-realised-say-mit-scientists
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 07 01:22PM -0400

Hello...
 
Read this:
 
 
The Earth's climate is approaching the breaking point
 
Read more here:
 
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ledevoir.com%2Fsociete%2Fenvironnement%2F534021%2Fle-climat-de-la-terre-s-approche-du-point-de-rupture
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 07 09:51AM -0400

Hello..
 
Read this:
 
 
I correct a last typo, read again..
 
About offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics..
 
I am a white Arab, and here is my questions and my answers about
offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics, read my following thoughts:
 
Questions:
 
What do i think about offshoring and macroeconomics?
 
Answer:
 
 
At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states
in the crisis of years 2000.
 
Also the second lever is the Keynes tax policy:
 
Keynes recommends using an expansionary fiscal policy in case
recession: reduce taxes and increase the state. In case of inflation, he
recommends doing the opposite.
 
The other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that
the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not
agree with them, because read the following:
 
Offshoring increases demand for more workers
"qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on
productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of
order of about 10%, also according to some recent research
the Offshoring of materials and services have both a
positive and not negligible effect on productivity.
 
When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of
empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring
on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel
2006).
 
For proof, read the following document:
 
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm
 
I observed more closely the model of for example the French system,
and I found that contrarily to England, for example the weight of the
public service in France is much more than that of England, but what
disturb me the most is that this French model tends to create between 0
and 1% of economic growth which seems to me problematic because this
very low growth rate in France can not compensate for the high birth
rate that creates 150,000 new workers returning new to the job market
every year and this tends to create a high rate of unemployment and is
not able to lower the rate unemployment and this too has created a large
debt and continues to create deficits and debt, and this seems to me
problematic for France , so what to do in France to unlock growth
economic and reduce the rate of unemployment? i think there is a
solution that is reduce the size of the state to increase public revenue
too, and also "reduce" taxes, because it is agreed that a lower taxes
mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the "multiplier
"tax effect": indeed, it results in an increase in households or
corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and
therefore, indirectly, the production and employment, so it reduces
unemployment.
 
 
Read the rest of my thoughts that i have extended:
 
About populism..
 
You are noticing that we are getting more and more into populism in
some western countries..
 
But what is the cause of this populism ?
 
I think that there is some misunderstanding between Democrats
and Republicans in USA, for example Democrats know about
the problem of globalisation that is because of the low living
conditions of China and third world countries they are capable of
providing lower price products than the western countries , this causes
also many industries of western countries to move to to China and to
third world countries to be able to be competitive. But Republicans are
not understanding Democrats, because Democrats know about this problem
of globalisation and they say that USA "must" create enough high value
and high quality products like in Germany to solve a big part of the
this problem of globalisation, thus the that lower class and middle
class also has to adapt by being more skilled and more educated to be
able to be this more quality and be more competitive, this is what was
lacking the in USA, this is why Democrats are not in accordance with
republicans, because they say that USA has to be more inventive and more
educated and more skilled to be able to solve this kind of problems of
globalisation, but governance of republicans of USA is based on this
populism that is not in accordance with what Democrats want, France and
other western countries have this same problem, please read my above
writing on France and Offshoring.
 
 
And about immigration now:
 
Look at this following video about:
 
Why Does the USA Need More IMMIGRANTS?
 
You will notice that the West "needs" immigrants because they are also
good for economic "growth".
 
But please look carefully at the following video to understand more:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmRgnDrhE9o
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 07 09:42AM -0400

Hello...
 
Read this:
 
 
About offshoring and immigration and macroeconomics..
 
I am a white Arab, and here is my questions and my answers about
offshoring and immigrantion and macroeconomics, read my following thoughts:
 
Questions:
 
What do i think about offshoring and macroeconomics?
 
Answer:
 
 
At the monetary policy level, inject or withdraw a mass
monetary policies help to control inflation and to stimulate
the economy by credit which result in more overall spending which
it leads to economic growth and more investment which is beneficial for
growth , except that monetary policy has a weakness if the borrowers are
too much at risk of bankruptcy as was also the case in the united states
in the crisis of years 2000.
 
Also the second lever is the Keynes tax policy:
 
Keynes recommends using an expansionary fiscal policy in case
recession: reduce taxes and increase the state. In case of inflation, he
recommends doing the opposite.
 
The other criticism I make on the far right political parties, is that
the far right makes us think offshoring as being just bad, but I do not
agree with them, because read the following:
 
Offshoring increases demand for more workers
"qualified" and also have a significant positive effect on
productivity, in Canada it is an increase in the "productivity" of
order of about 10%, also according to some recent research
the Offshoring of materials and services have both a
positive and not negligible effect on productivity.
 
When it comes to the repercussion on employment, the majority of
empirical studies suggest that the general repercussions of offshoring
on the employment levels are low (Amiti and Wei 2005, Mankiw and Swagel
2006).
 
For proof, read the following document:
 
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww150.statcan.gc.ca%2Fn1%2Fpub%2F11f0027m%2F2008055%2Fs6-fra.htm
 
I observed more closely the model of for example the French system,
and I found that contrarily to England, for example the weight of the
public service in France is much more than that of England, but what
disturb me the most is that this French model tends to create between 0
and 1% of economic growth which seems to me problematic because this
very low growth rate in France can not compensate for the high birth
rate that creates 150,000 new workers returning new to the job market
every year and this tends to create a high rate of unemployment and is
not able to lower the rate unemployment and this too has created a large
debt and continues to create deficits and debt, and this seems to me
problematic for France , so what to do in France to unlock growth
economic and reduce the rate of unemployment? i think there is a
solution that is reduce the size of the state to increase public revenue
too, and also "reduce" taxes, because it is agreed that a lower taxes
mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the "multiplier
"tax effect": indeed, it results in an increase in households or
corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and
therefore, indirectly, the production and employment, so it reduces
unemployment.
 
 
Read the rest of my thoughts that i have extended:
 
About populism..
 
You are noticing that we are getting more and more into populism in
some western countries..
 
But what is the cause of this populism ?
 
I think that there is some misunderstanding between Democrats
and Republicans in USA, for example Democrats know about
the problem of globalisation that is because of the low living
conditions of China and third world countries they are capable of
providing lower price products than the western countries , this causes
also many industries of western countries to move to to China and to
third world countries to be able to be competitive. But Republicans are
not understanding Democrats, because Democrats know about this problem
of globalisation and they say that USA "must" create enough high value
and high quality products like in Germany to solve a big part of the
this problem of globalisation, thus the that lower class and middle
class also has to adapt by being more skilled and more educated to be
able to be this more quality and be more competitive, this is what was
lacking the in USA, this is why Democrats are not in accordance with
republicans, because they say that USA has to be more inventive and more
educated and more skilled to be able to solve this kind of problems of
globalisation, but governance of republicans of USA is based on this
populism that is not in accordance with what Democrats want, France and
other western countries have this same problem, please read my above
writing on France and Offshoring.
 
 
And about immigration now:
 
Look at this following video about:
 
Why Does the USA Need More IMMIGRANTS?
 
You will notice that the West "needs" immigrants because they are also
good for economic "growth".
 
But please look carefully at the following video to understand more:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmRgnDrhE9o
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 06 05:47PM -0400

Hello..
 
 
About Extreme Scaling in CAE Applications..
 
I have just read the following about Ansys company:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansys
 
 
Notice that Ansys develops and markets finite element analysis software
used to simulate engineering problems.
 
I think that i have thought about this, and i have "invented"
a Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library,
in fact it scales "very" well, my library contains a Scalable Parallel
implementation of Conjugate Gradient Dense Linear System Solver library
that is NUMA-aware and cache-aware, and it contains also a Scalable
Parallel implementation of Conjugate Gradient Sparse Linear
System Solver library that is cache-aware.
 
Sparse linear system solvers are ubiquitous in high performance
computing (HPC) and often are the most computational intensive parts in
scientific computing codes. A few of the many applications relying on
sparse linear solvers include fusion energy simulation, space weather
simulation, climate modeling, and environmental modeling, and finite
element method, and large-scale reservoir simulations to enhance oil
recovery by the oil and gas industry.
 
Conjugate Gradient is known to converge to the exact solution in n steps
for a matrix of size n, and was historically first seen as a direct
method because of this. However, after a while people figured out that
it works really well if you just stop the iteration much earlier - often
you will get a very good approximation after much fewer than n steps. In
fact, we can analyze how fast Conjugate gradient converges. The end
result is that Conjugate gradient is used as an iterative method for
large linear systems today.
 
 
You can download my Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear
System Solver Library from here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-c-conjugate-gradient-linear-system-solver-library
 
Read the following about Extreme Scaling in CAE Applications, this is
why i have invented my Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear
System Solver Library that scales very well:
 
https://www.cray.com/blog/extreme-scaling-in-cae-applications/
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 06 03:07PM -0400

Hello..
 
 
More about my scalable algorithms and there implementations..
 
You know me more now that i am a white arab and that i am an inventor of
many scalable algorithms and there implementations..
 
I have thought yesterday about my scalable algorithms that uses
my enhanced version of scalable counting networks, and i think
that eventhough they are really powerful now, i think i will "enhance"
more the scalable counting network algorithms, because the counting
network algorithm is not working good as it is, so i have enhanced it,
and i will enhance it soon to be much more efficient than my previous
enhanced version of scalable counting network, and i after that i will
contact the companies bellow, so that to sell to them some of my
scalable algorithms and there implementations in C++ and Delphi, here is
the companies:
 
Since i am in Montreal Canada, i will contact Microsoft company at there
office in Montreal here:
 
https://www.microsoft.com/en-ca/about/locations.aspx
 
 
And i will contact also CAE in Monteal, so that to sell to them some of
my scalable algorithms and there implementations, because they need to
scale more to many cores, read here to know about this company:
 
https://www.cray.com/blog/extreme-scaling-in-cae-applications/
 
Here is CAE company:
 
http://www.cae.com/
 
And i will contact also Embarcadero that sells C++Builder and Delphi to
sell them some of my scalable algorithms and there implementations.
 
 
As you are noticing i am an inventor, and I need to become rich.
 
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)