Saturday, August 4, 2018

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 10 updates in 10 topics

Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 04 03:36AM -0400

Hello..
 
I correct some typos, because i think fast and i write fast, please
read again:
 
 
I am a white arab..
 
About free software and open source projects..
 
As you have noticed , i have invented many scalable algorithms
and there implementations, i have given freely some of them, but i will
also sell some of them to Google or to Microsoft or to Embarcadero, and
you have to understand more what is open source and free software ,
because as you have noticed many of my software projects are open source
and are also freewares..
 
I think the "spirit" of open source and free software projects comes
from a question to ask: Must science and technology be just for sale
to make money ? I think no. Because i think that the answer to that
question is that today universities are noticing that scientific and
technological knowledge of universities has also to be shared to render
science and technology more "efficient", so it is a difficult subject
but you are noticing that today many of the scientific and technological
knowledge of universities is freely available, this look
like open source and free software, open source and free software are
also saying that some part of softwares has also to be shared to be able
for others to understand it and to work on it to make it better and to
also bring more "efficiency". So this is also a difficult subject, but
this is how our world look like.
 
Read the rest of my post to understand better my thoughts:
 
About politics..
 
You have seen me writing about morality, and hope you have
understood my writing..
 
Now you have seen me explaining to you that morality is RELIABILIY
or perfection at best.
 
But there is still an important thing to know:
 
Reliability dictates also that today politics must take into account
the powers and counter-powers, for example we have the power of
consumer confidence index that we have to higher locally and
internationally, and also our world is a much "interconnected" world
economically and scientifically and technologically etc. also science
and technology is not just "private" companies, it is also universities
that share freely scientific and technological knowledge with others, so
this has to shape our politics , and make us see that our world is not
the mess of the past, and our world has changed, and we are more capable
today, and we are more interconnected today, and universities are also
sharing freely scientific and technological knowledge, so we have to not
be idiocy and we have to be more wisdom and take this facts into account.
 
 
Now you know me more, that i am a white arab, and a more
serious computer programmer, and i am doing also philosophy and
political philosophy, and you have seen me writing my poems and
explaining them more to you.. so hope you are feeling more confident
about me..
 
About capitalism now..
 
What do you think is capitalism ?
 
Capitalism is not as neo-nazism that starts from the idea that
it has to be european whites to be "perfection" and it wants to be
european whites, because this is a contradiction ! because perfection of
today needs "imperfections" of for example being more "weak" or "less"
beautiful to be able to be perfection ! this is the contradiction of
nazism and neo-nazism ! nazism and neo-nazism is not understanding it
correctly ! perfection of today is also the weak that needs the strong
and the strong that needs the weak ! and perfection of today has to know
how to accept some level of imperfections to be able to be the right
perfection ! this is what is not understanding neo-nazism and nazism !
this is why neo-nazism and nazism is intellectual inferiority. So now
you are more equipped to understand more what is morality.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
I am a white arab..
 
Yet about philosophy and political philosophy
 
You have to be smart to do philosophy and political philosophy
correctly..
 
You have seen me doing philosophy and political philosophy about morality..
 
But we have to be smart, because when you will read my previous post
about morality, you will start to understand more and to see more,
this is the goal of philosophy, and as you have noticed i have explained
to you why morality is the concept of RELIABILITY, and it is also
perfection at best, so you are feeling more its essence, so as you have
noticed we are pushed towards absolute perfections that will give total
happiness, so we have to solve our problems to attain like absolute
perfection, this is the essence and the goal of reliability: it is
solving problems, so you are understanding that capitalism too is
constrained by "reliability", because it must be "reliable" to advance
towards the goal that is happiness, so it must be also responsability ,
because capitalism that is composed of today capitalism and of the
future of capitalism must be responsability that knows how to manage our
world and the system.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
I am a white arab..
 
Here is my new thoughts of today about philosophy and political philosophy..
 
What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy
and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure"
and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to
reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed
i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its
"essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important
question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is
the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more
"precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ?
i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing
can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is
morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and
"reliability", or simply "reliability" that can model morality correctly
as i have proved it(read my proof bellow), so the essence of our
civilization is the act of coordinating and organizing those advantages
and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to
be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence
"reliability", and as a validation of my model, you will notice that we
are decentralizing "governance", and each of the decentralized parts of
the governance are grouping the "advantages" and trying to minimize the
disadvantages of each of us that do the governance , democracy is also
the same , because democracy is a system that wants to escape a "local"
maximum towards a global maximum like in artificial intelligence, and
democracy is doing it by applying itself to selecting the best among the
actors of politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of
civilization, is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by
optimization, as i have just explained to you.
 
Now about the essence of reliability
 
I am still doing philosophy, and you will notice what is smartness..
 
About the essence of reliability to be able for you to understand
the essence of morality..
 
What is the essence of reliability ? how reliability must be measured ?
 
If you say that being reliable is solving problems or not, it doesn't
show what is really reliability, you have to understand philosophically
its essence, i think that reliability is measured also by what is it
to be "happiness", the goal of human is being this "happiness", but
happiness has necessary "requirements", and the "nature" of requirements
is also being like absolute perfection that solves all our problems to
be able to be happiness, and this is why morality is pushed towards
absolute perfection that is absolute reliability that permit us to be
real happiness.
 
More precision about the essence of morality
 
I said before that:
 
"You have seen me defining to you morality as being: perfection at best,
or quality at best , or that it is RELIABILITY !"
 
When i say morality is RELIABILITY, i mean it is the concept of
RELIABILITY, because we can prove it by philosophy, because
the "goal" of human life is to be able be happiness, and to be able
to be happiness is solving like all our problems, and solving problems
is the essence of reliability, so morality is the goal of life
that is solving problems to be able to be "happiness", this is smartness.
 
I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has
invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.
 
Now about the right abstraction of morality
 
What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?
 
This is a good question in philosophy !
 
It is like mathematics , you have to be more "logical" and be more
"measure" and be more "precise", and being more logical and more measure
and more precise is like doing mathematics !
 
Why have you seen me defining and explaining to you what is morality ?
 
It is a very serious subject, and you have to be smart to understand it !
 
Because philosophy, like the philosophy of the philosopher that is Sir
Immanuel Kant, must be a philosophy that is more "precise" calculations
with logic and measure that has as a goal to make us understand what is
all about morality ! this is what also i am doing ! and i will continu
to do it in front of your eyes..
 
So my question of today is:
 
What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?
 
A more correct abstraction of morality is first a definition
of morality that is sufficient and necessary to be able to see
more the big picture of what is morality, you can define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience, but i think that
this definition is too much abstraction that doesn't show us the big
picture of what is morality, so we have to be more smart , this
is why you have seen me thinking more smartly to find what is morality,
and you have noticed that my first definition of morality was that
morality is: Performance and reliability or is by just one word
reliability, and i have also defined morality by saying that it is:
perfection and strongness , and i have finally explained and give
another definition of morality that is: morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, this
abstraction is more correct also , i explain:
 
So when i said that morality is: performance and reliability, is it
a correct definition ?
 
It is like philosophy that i am doing..
 
So notice that i have proved it this way:
 
==
 
From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?
 
Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are
organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so
from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our
essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and
strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact
that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so
this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is
inherent to morality.
 
So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on
"performance".
 
===
 
 
So as you have noticed that this proves the part of my definition
of morality that it is also "performance", now the second part
of the definition of morality is that morality is also "reliability",
and i have "proved" it like this:
 
==
 
What is the essence of reliability ?
 
What is reliability ?
 
We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the
measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right
"perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right
perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.
 
==
 
So now you are seeing more the big picture of what is morality,
because the essence of reliability is solving problems and
the essence of perfection is also the same , it is solving problems,
and "performance" is inherent to the concept of reliability ,
because to be able to solve problems, reliability must
be also performance or strongness, this is why i said that
the definition of morality can be also only: RELIABILITY ,
or it can be also Performance and reliability or it can
be perfection and strongness,
 
You can define morality as being a composition of a priori pure moral
inferred from reason and of empirical moral inferred from experience.
 
You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.
 
Now what about my definitions of morality ?
 
We have to be more smart..
 
I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good
for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will
notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection",
but we have to speak about a constraint over morality,
that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are
too bad ! so this will abstract more correctly the definition
of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality
as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells
us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive"
we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and
when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that
means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it,
so my definition is also correct, and this applies also to my other
definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical
proof is valid
 
Morality is also "diversity"
 
I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction,
i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that
are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the
system, i think that's lack
of maturity that doesn't recognize that there is also "constrains"
that we have to deal with, and saying like neo-nazism that all
that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be a parasite is also
an "idealism" that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be
more "maturity" that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be
able to be an appropriate morality, today because of our world is
not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate
that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google)
and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals,
and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing
the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that
takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take
more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think
that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism,
because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to
be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections
of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 04 03:27AM -0400

Hello...
 
Read this:
 
 
I am a white arab..
 
About free software and open source projects..
 
As you have noticed , i have invented many scalable algorithms
and there implementations, i have given freely some of them, but i will
also sell some of them to Google or to Microsoft or to Embarcadero, i
have ut you have to understand more what is open source and free
software , because as you have noticed many of my software projects are
open source and are also freewares..
 
I think the "spirit" of open source and free software projects comes
from a question to ask: Must science and technology be just for sale
to make money ? I think no. Because i think that the answer to that
question is that today universities are noticing that scientific and
technological knowledge of universities has also to be shared to render
science and technology more "efficient", so it is a difficult subject
but you are noticing that today many of the scientific and technological
knowledge of universities is freely available, this look
like open source and free software, open source and free software are
also saying that some part of softwares has also to be shared to be able
for others to understand it and to work on it to make it better and to
also bring more "efficiency". So this is also a difficult subject, but
this is how our world look like.
 
Read the rest of my post to understand better my thoughts:
 
About politics..
 
You have seen me writing about morality, and hope you have
understood my writing..
 
Now you have seen me explaining to you that morality is RELIABILIY
or perfection at best.
 
But there is still an important thing to know:
 
Reliability dictates also that today politics must take into account
the powers and counter-powers, for example we have the power of
consumer confidence index that we have to higher locally and
internationally, and also our world is a much "interconnected" world
economically and scientifically and technologically etc. also science
and technology is not just "private" companies, it is also universities
that share freely scientific and technological knowledge with others, so
this has to shape our politics , and make us see that our world is not
the mess of the past, and our world has changed, and we are more capable
today, and we are more interconnected today, and universities are also
sharing freely scientific and technological knowledge, so we have to not
be idiocy and we have to be more wisdom and take this facts into account.
 
 
Now you know me more, that i am a white arab, and a more
serious computer programmer, and i am doing also philosophy and
political philosophy, and you have seen me writing my poems and
explaining them more to you.. so hope you are feeling more confident
about me..
 
About capitalism now..
 
What do you think is capitalism ?
 
Capitalism is not as neo-nazism that starts from the idea that
it has to be european whites to be "perfection" and it wants to be
european whites, because this is a contradiction ! because perfection of
today needs "imperfections" of for example being more "weak" or "less"
beautiful to be able to be perfection ! this is the contradiction of
nazism and neo-nazism ! nazism and neo-nazism is not understanding it
correctly ! perfection of today is also the weak that needs the strong
and the strong that needs the weak ! and perfection of today has to know
how to accept some level of imperfections to be able to be the right
perfection ! this is what is not understanding neo-nazism and nazism !
this is why neo-nazism and nazism is intellectual inferiority. So now
you are more equipped to understand more what is morality.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
I am a white arab..
 
Yet about philosophy and political philosophy
 
You have to be smart to do philosophy and political philosophy
correctly..
 
You have seen me doing philosophy and political philosophy about morality..
 
But we have to be smart, because when you will read my previous post
about morality, you will start to understand more and to see more,
this is the goal of philosophy, and as you have noticed i have explained
to you why morality is the concept of RELIABILITY, and it is also
perfection at best, so you are feeling more its essence, so as you have
noticed we are pushed towards absolute perfections that will give total
happiness, so we have to solve our problems to attain like absolute
perfection, this is the essence and the goal of reliability: it is
solving problems, so you are understanding that capitalism too is
constrained by "reliability", because it must be "reliable" to advance
towards the goal that is happiness, so it must be also responsability ,
because capitalism that is composed of today capitalism and of the
future of capitalism must be responsability that knows how to manage our
world and the system.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
I am a white arab..
 
Here is my new thoughts of today about philosophy and political philosophy..
 
What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy
and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure"
and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to
reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed
i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its
"essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important
question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is
the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more
"precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ?
i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing
can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is
morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and
"reliability", or simply "reliability" that can model morality correctly
as i have proved it(read my proof bellow), so the essence of our
civilization is the act of coordinating and organizing those advantages
and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to
be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence
"reliability", and as a validation of my model, you will notice that we
are decentralizing "governance", and each of the decentralized parts of
the governance are grouping the "advantages" and trying to minimize the
disadvantages of each of us that do the governance , democracy is also
the same , because democracy is a system that wants to escape a "local"
maximum towards a global maximum like in artificial intelligence, and
democracy is doing it by applying itself to selecting the best among the
actors of politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of
civilization, is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by
optimization, as i have just explained to you.
 
Now about the essence of reliability
 
I am still doing philosophy, and you will notice what is smartness..
 
About the essence of reliability to be able for you to understand
the essence of morality..
 
What is the essence of reliability ? how reliability must be measured ?
 
If you say that being reliable is solving problems or not, it doesn't
show what is really reliability, you have to understand philosophically
its essence, i think that reliability is measured also by what is it
to be "happiness", the goal of human is being this "happiness", but
happiness has necessary "requirements", and the "nature" of requirements
is also being like absolute perfection that solves all our problems to
be able to be happiness, and this is why morality is pushed towards
absolute perfection that is absolute reliability that permit us to be
real happiness.
 
More precision about the essence of morality
 
I said before that:
 
"You have seen me defining to you morality as being: perfection at best,
or quality at best , or that it is RELIABILITY !"
 
When i say morality is RELIABILITY, i mean it is the concept of
RELIABILITY, because we can prove it by philosophy, because
the "goal" of human life is to be able be happiness, and to be able
to be happiness is solving like all our problems, and solving problems
is the essence of reliability, so morality is the goal of life
that is solving problems to be able to be "happiness", this is smartness.
 
I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has
invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.
 
Now about the right abstraction of morality
 
What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?
 
This is a good question in philosophy !
 
It is like mathematics , you have to be more "logical" and be more
"measure" and be more "precise", and being more logical and more measure
and more precise is like doing mathematics !
 
Why have you seen me defining and explaining to you what is morality ?
 
It is a very serious subject, and you have to be smart to understand it !
 
Because philosophy, like the philosophy of the philosopher that is Sir
Immanuel Kant, must be a philosophy that is more "precise" calculations
with logic and measure that has as a goal to make us understand what is
all about morality ! this is what also i am doing ! and i will continu
to do it in front of your eyes..
 
So my question of today is:
 
What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?
 
A more correct abstraction of morality is first a definition
of morality that is sufficient and necessary to be able to see
more the big picture of what is morality, you can define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience, but i think that
this definition is too much abstraction that doesn't show us the big
picture of what is morality, so we have to be more smart , this
is why you have seen me thinking more smartly to find what is morality,
and you have noticed that my first definition of morality was that
morality is: Performance and reliability or is by just one word
reliability, and i have also defined morality by saying that it is:
perfection and strongness , and i have finally explained and give
another definition of morality that is: morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, this
abstraction is more correct also , i explain:
 
So when i said that morality is: performance and reliability, is it
a correct definition ?
 
It is like philosophy that i am doing..
 
So notice that i have proved it this way:
 
==
 
From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?
 
Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are
organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so
from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our
essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and
strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact
that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so
this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is
inherent to morality.
 
So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on
"performance".
 
===
 
 
So as you have noticed that this proves the part of my definition
of morality that it is also "performance", now the second part
of the definition of morality is that morality is also "reliability",
and i have "proved" it like this:
 
==
 
What is the essence of reliability ?
 
What is reliability ?
 
We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the
measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right
"perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right
perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.
 
==
 
So now you are seeing more the big picture of what is morality,
because the essence of reliability is solving problems and
the essence of perfection is also the same , it is solving problems,
and "performance" is inherent to the concept of reliability ,
because to be able to solve problems, reliability must
be also performance or strongness, this is why i said that
the definition of morality can be also only: RELIABILITY ,
or it can be also Performance and reliability or it can
be perfection and strongness,
 
You can define morality as being a composition of a priori pure moral
inferred from reason and of empirical moral inferred from experience.
 
You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.
 
Now what about my definitions of morality ?
 
We have to be more smart..
 
I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good
for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will
notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection",
but we have to speak about a constraint over morality,
that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are
too bad ! so this will abstract more correctly the definition
of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality
as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells
us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive"
we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and
when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that
means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it,
so my definition is also correct, and this applies also to my other
definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical
proof is valid
 
Morality is also "diversity"
 
I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction,
i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that
are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the
system, i think that's lack
of maturity that doesn't recognize that there is also "constrains"
that we have to deal with, and saying like neo-nazism that all
that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be a parasite is also
an "idealism" that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be
more "maturity" that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be
able to be an appropriate morality, today because of our world is
not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate
that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google)
and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals,
and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing
the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that
takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take
more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think
that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism,
because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to
be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections
of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears
the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 04 02:29AM -0400

Hello...
 
Read this:
 
 
I correct some typos because i write fast, read again:
 
About politics..
 
You have seen me writing about morality, and hope you have
understood my writing..
 
Now you have seen me explaining to you that morality is RELIABILIY
or perfection at best.
 
But there is still an important thing to know:
 
Reliability dictates also that today politics must take into account
the powers and counter-powers, for example we have the power of
consumer confidence index that we have to higher locally and
internationally, and also our world is a much "interconnected" world
economically and scientifically and technologically etc. also science
and technology is not just "private" companies, it is also universities
that share freely scientific and technological knowledge with others, so
this has to shape our politics , and make us see that our world is not
the mess of the past, and our world has changed, and we are more capable
today, and we are more interconnected today, and universities are also
sharing freely scientific and technological knowledge, so we have to not
be idiocy and we have to be more wisdom and take this facts into account.
 
Read the rest of my post to understand more my thoughts:
 
 
Now you know me more, that i am a white arab, and a more
serious computer programmer, and i am doing also philosophy and
political philosophy, and you have seen me writing my poems and
explaining them more to you.. so hope you are feeling more confident
about me..
 
About capitalism now..
 
What do you think is capitalism ?
 
Capitalism is not as neo-nazism that starts from the idea that
it has to be european whites to be "perfection" and it wants to be
european whites, because this is a contradiction ! because perfection of
today needs "imperfections" of for example being more "weak" or "less"
beautiful to be able to be perfection ! this is the contradiction of
nazism and neo-nazism ! nazism and neo-nazism is not understanding it
correctly ! perfection of today is also the weak that needs the strong
and the strong that needs the weak ! and perfection of today has to know
how to accept some level of imperfections to be able to be the right
perfection ! this is what is not understanding neo-nazism and nazism !
this is why neo-nazism and nazism is intellectual inferiority. So now
you are more equipped to understand more what is morality.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
I am a white arab..
 
Yet about philosophy and political philosophy
 
You have to be smart to do philosophy and political philosophy
correctly..
 
You have seen me doing philosophy and political philosophy about morality..
 
But we have to be smart, because when you will read my previous post
about morality, you will start to understand more and to see more,
this is the goal of philosophy, and as you have noticed i have explained
to you why morality is the concept of RELIABILITY, and it is also
perfection at best, so you are feeling more its essence, so as you have
noticed we are pushed towards absolute perfections that will give total
happiness, so we have to solve our problems to attain like absolute
perfection, this is the essence and the goal of reliability: it is
solving problems, so you are understanding that capitalism too is
constrained by "reliability", because it must be "reliable" to advance
towards the goal that is happiness, so it must be also responsability ,
because capitalism that is composed of today capitalism and of the
future of capitalism must be responsability that knows how to manage our
world and the system.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
I am a white arab..
 
Here is my new thoughts of today about philosophy and political philosophy..
 
What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy
and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure"
and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to
reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed
i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its
"essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important
question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is
the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more
"precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ?
i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing
can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is
morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and
"reliability", or simply "reliability" that can model morality correctly
as i have proved it(read my proof bellow), so the essence of our
civilization is the act of coordinating and organizing those advantages
and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to
be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence
"reliability", and as a validation of my model, you will notice that we
are decentralizing "governance", and each of the decentralized parts of
the governance are grouping the "advantages" and trying to minimize the
disadvantages of each of us that do the governance , democracy is also
the same , because democracy is a system that wants to escape a "local"
maximum towards a global maximum like in artificial intelligence, and
democracy is doing it by applying itself to selecting the best among the
actors of politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of
civilization, is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by
optimization, as i have just explained to you.
 
Now about the essence of reliability
 
I am still doing philosophy, and you will notice what is smartness..
 
About the essence of reliability to be able for you to understand
the essence of morality..
 
What is the essence of reliability ? how reliability must be measured ?
 
If you say that being reliable is solving problems or not, it doesn't
show what is really reliability, you have to understand philosophically
its essence, i think that reliability is measured also by what is it
to be "happiness", the goal of human is being this "happiness", but
happiness has necessary "requirements", and the "nature" of requirements
is also being like absolute perfection that solves all our problems to
be able to be happiness, and this is why morality is pushed towards
absolute perfection that is absolute reliability that permit us to be
real happiness.
 
More precision about the essence of morality
 
I said before that:
 
"You have seen me defining to you morality as being: perfection at best,
or quality at best , or that it is RELIABILITY !"
 
When i say morality is RELIABILITY, i mean it is the concept of
RELIABILITY, because we can prove it by philosophy, because
the "goal" of human life is to be able be happiness, and to be able
to be happiness is solving like all our problems, and solving problems
is the essence of reliability, so morality is the goal of life
that is solving problems to be able to be "happiness", this is smartness.
 
I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has
invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.
 
Now about the right abstraction of morality
 
What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?
 
This is a good question in philosophy !
 
It is like mathematics , you have to be more "logical" and be more
"measure" and be more "precise", and being more logical and more measure
and more precise is like doing mathematics !
 
Why have you seen me defining and explaining to you what is morality ?
 
It is a very serious subject, and you have to be smart to understand it !
 
Because philosophy, like the philosophy of the philosopher that is Sir
Immanuel Kant, must be a philosophy that is more "precise" calculations
with logic and measure that has as a goal to make us understand what is
all about morality ! this is what also i am doing ! and i will continu
to do it in front of your eyes..
 
So my question of today is:
 
What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?
 
A more correct abstraction of morality is first a definition
of morality that is sufficient and necessary to be able to see
more the big picture of what is morality, you can define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience, but i think that
this definition is too much abstraction that doesn't show us the big
picture of what is morality, so we have to be more smart , this
is why you have seen me thinking more smartly to find what is morality,
and you have noticed that my first definition of morality was that
morality is: Performance and reliability or is by just one word
reliability, and i have also defined morality by saying that it is:
perfection and strongness , and i have finally explained and give
another definition of morality that is: morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, this
abstraction is more correct also , i explain:
 
So when i said that morality is: performance and reliability, is it
a correct definition ?
 
It is like philosophy that i am doing..
 
So notice that i have proved it this way:
 
==
 
From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?
 
Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are
organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so
from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our
essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and
strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact
that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so
this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is
inherent to morality.
 
So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on
"performance".
 
===
 
 
So as you have noticed that this proves the part of my definition
of morality that it is also "performance", now the second part
of the definition of morality is that morality is also "reliability",
and i have "proved" it like this:
 
==
 
What is the essence of reliability ?
 
What is reliability ?
 
We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the
measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right
"perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right
perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.
 
==
 
So now you are seeing more the big picture of what is morality,
because the essence of reliability is solving problems and
the essence of perfection is also the same , it is solving problems,
and "performance" is inherent to the concept of reliability ,
because to be able to solve problems, reliability must
be also performance or strongness, this is why i said that
the definition of morality can be also only: RELIABILITY ,
or it can be also Performance and reliability or it can
be perfection and strongness,
 
You can define morality as being a composition of a priori pure moral
inferred from reason and of empirical moral inferred from experience.
 
You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.
 
Now what about my definitions of morality ?
 
We have to be more smart..
 
I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good
for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will
notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection",
but we have to speak about a constraint over morality,
that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are
too bad ! so this will abstract more correctly the definition
of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality
as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells
us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive"
we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and
when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that
means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it,
so my definition is also correct, and this applies also to my other
definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical
proof is valid
 
Morality is also "diversity"
 
I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction,
i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that
are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the
system, i think that's lack
of maturity that doesn't recognize that there is also "constrains"
that we have to deal with, and saying like neo-nazism that all
that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be a parasite is also
an "idealism" that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be
more "maturity" that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be
able to be an appropriate morality, today because of our world is
not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate
that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google)
and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals,
and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing
the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that
takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take
more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think
that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism,
because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to
be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections
of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears
the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of other ideologies
like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why capitalistic systems are
"conservatism" of there capitalism.
 
More about the essence of morality..
 
We have to be more smart, what is it doing philosophy about
the essence of morality ? it is something really interesting,
and you have seen me doing more philosophy about the essence of
morality, but i was thinking more about philosophy, and i think my
philosophy about the essence of morality makes us understanding the
essence of philosophy in itself ! because by applying yourself at doing
philosophy about morality you will understand more what is philosophy !
understanding what is the essence of political philosophy or philosophy
is something "great" or of a great importance ! now you have to
understand my thinking of philosophy about the essence of morality:
if we say that the essence of morality or what is morality is
that morality is (like was defining it the philosopher Immanuel Kant):
A priori pure moral inferred from reason and it is also empirical moral
inferred from experience, i said that this definition is too much
abstraction, and more than that the goal of my philosophy is also
to find like if morality is more safer ! and since i am a more
serious computer programmer, like
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 04 02:23AM -0400

Hello....
 
Read this:
 
 
About politics..
 
You have seen me writing about morality, and hope you have
understood my writing..
 
Now you have seen me explaining to you that morality is RELIABILIY
or perfection at best.
 
But there is still an important thing to know:
 
Reliability dictates also that today politics must take into account
the powers and counter-powers, for example we have the power of
consumer confidence index that we have to higher locally and internally,
and also our world is a much "interconnected" world economically and
scientifically and technologically etc. also science and technology is
not just "private" companies, it is also universities that share freely
scientific and technological knowledge with others, so this has to shape
our politics , and make us see that our world is not the mess of the
past, and our world has changed, and we are more capable today, and we
are more interconnected today, and universities are also sharing freely
scientific and technological knowledge, so we have to not be idiocy and
we have to be more wisdom and take this facts into account.
 
Read the rest of my post to understand more my thoughts:
 
 
Now you know me more, that i am a white arab, and a more
serious computer programmer, and i am doing also philosophy and
political philosophy, and you have seen me writing my poems and
explaining them more to you.. so hope you are feeling more confident
about me..
 
About capitalism now..
 
What do you think is capitalism ?
 
Capitalism is not as neo-nazism that starts from the idea that
it has to be european whites to be "perfection" and it wants to be
european whites, because this is a contradiction ! because perfection of
today needs "imperfections" of for example being more "weak" or "less"
beautiful to be able to be perfection ! this is the contradiction of
nazism and neo-nazism ! nazism and neo-nazism is not understanding it
correctly ! perfection of today is also the weak that needs the strong
and the strong that needs the weak ! and perfection of today has to know
how to accept some level of imperfections to be able to be the right
perfection ! this is what is not understanding neo-nazism and nazism !
this is why neo-nazism and nazism is intellectual inferiority. So now
you are more equipped to understand more what is morality.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
I am a white arab..
 
Yet about philosophy and political philosophy
 
You have to be smart to do philosophy and political philosophy
correctly..
 
You have seen me doing philosophy and political philosophy about morality..
 
But we have to be smart, because when you will read my previous post
about morality, you will start to understand more and to see more,
this is the goal of philosophy, and as you have noticed i have explained
to you why morality is the concept of RELIABILITY, and it is also
perfection at best, so you are feeling more its essence, so as you have
noticed we are pushed towards absolute perfections that will give total
happiness, so we have to solve our problems to attain like absolute
perfection, this is the essence and the goal of reliability: it is
solving problems, so you are understanding that capitalism too is
constrained by "reliability", because it must be "reliable" to advance
towards the goal that is happiness, so it must be also responsability ,
because capitalism that is composed of today capitalism and of the
future of capitalism must be responsability that knows how to manage our
world and the system.
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:
 
I am a white arab..
 
Here is my new thoughts of today about philosophy and political philosophy..
 
What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy
and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure"
and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to
reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed
i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its
"essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important
question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is
the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more
"precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ?
i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing
can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is
morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and
"reliability", or simply "reliability" that can model morality correctly
as i have proved it(read my proof bellow), so the essence of our
civilization is the act of coordinating and organizing those advantages
and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to
be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence
"reliability", and as a validation of my model, you will notice that we
are decentralizing "governance", and each of the decentralized parts of
the governance are grouping the "advantages" and trying to minimize the
disadvantages of each of us that do the governance , democracy is also
the same , because democracy is a system that wants to escape a "local"
maximum towards a global maximum like in artificial intelligence, and
democracy is doing it by applying itself to selecting the best among the
actors of politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of
civilization, is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by
optimization, as i have just explained to you.
 
Now about the essence of reliability
 
I am still doing philosophy, and you will notice what is smartness..
 
About the essence of reliability to be able for you to understand
the essence of morality..
 
What is the essence of reliability ? how reliability must be measured ?
 
If you say that being reliable is solving problems or not, it doesn't
show what is really reliability, you have to understand philosophically
its essence, i think that reliability is measured also by what is it
to be "happiness", the goal of human is being this "happiness", but
happiness has necessary "requirements", and the "nature" of requirements
is also being like absolute perfection that solves all our problems to
be able to be happiness, and this is why morality is pushed towards
absolute perfection that is absolute reliability that permit us to be
real happiness.
 
More precision about the essence of morality
 
I said before that:
 
"You have seen me defining to you morality as being: perfection at best,
or quality at best , or that it is RELIABILITY !"
 
When i say morality is RELIABILITY, i mean it is the concept of
RELIABILITY, because we can prove it by philosophy, because
the "goal" of human life is to be able be happiness, and to be able
to be happiness is solving like all our problems, and solving problems
is the essence of reliability, so morality is the goal of life
that is solving problems to be able to be "happiness", this is smartness.
 
I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has
invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.
 
Now about the right abstraction of morality
 
What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?
 
This is a good question in philosophy !
 
It is like mathematics , you have to be more "logical" and be more
"measure" and be more "precise", and being more logical and more measure
and more precise is like doing mathematics !
 
Why have you seen me defining and explaining to you what is morality ?
 
It is a very serious subject, and you have to be smart to understand it !
 
Because philosophy, like the philosophy of the philosopher that is Sir
Immanuel Kant, must be a philosophy that is more "precise" calculations
with logic and measure that has as a goal to make us understand what is
all about morality ! this is what also i am doing ! and i will continu
to do it in front of your eyes..
 
So my question of today is:
 
What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?
 
A more correct abstraction of morality is first a definition
of morality that is sufficient and necessary to be able to see
more the big picture of what is morality, you can define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience, but i think that
this definition is too much abstraction that doesn't show us the big
picture of what is morality, so we have to be more smart , this
is why you have seen me thinking more smartly to find what is morality,
and you have noticed that my first definition of morality was that
morality is: Performance and reliability or is by just one word
reliability, and i have also defined morality by saying that it is:
perfection and strongness , and i have finally explained and give
another definition of morality that is: morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, this
abstraction is more correct also , i explain:
 
So when i said that morality is: performance and reliability, is it
a correct definition ?
 
It is like philosophy that i am doing..
 
So notice that i have proved it this way:
 
==
 
From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?
 
Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are
organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so
from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our
essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and
strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact
that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so
this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is
inherent to morality.
 
So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on
"performance".
 
===
 
 
So as you have noticed that this proves the part of my definition
of morality that it is also "performance", now the second part
of the definition of morality is that morality is also "reliability",
and i have "proved" it like this:
 
==
 
What is the essence of reliability ?
 
What is reliability ?
 
We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the
measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right
"perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right
perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.
 
==
 
So now you are seeing more the big picture of what is morality,
because the essence of reliability is solving problems and
the essence of perfection is also the same , it is solving problems,
and "performance" is inherent to the concept of reliability ,
because to be able to solve problems, reliability must
be also performance or strongness, this is why i said that
the definition of morality can be also only: RELIABILITY ,
or it can be also Performance and reliability or it can
be perfection and strongness,
 
You can define morality as being a composition of a priori pure moral
inferred from reason and of empirical moral inferred from experience.
 
You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.
 
Now what about my definitions of morality ?
 
We have to be more smart..
 
I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good
for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will
notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection",
but we have to speak about a constraint over morality,
that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are
too bad ! so this will abstract more correctly the definition
of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality
as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells
us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive"
we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and
when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that
means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it,
so my definition is also correct, and this applies also to my other
definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical
proof is valid
 
Morality is also "diversity"
 
I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction,
i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that
are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the
system, i think that's lack
of maturity that doesn't recognize that there is also "constrains"
that we have to deal with, and saying like neo-nazism that all
that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be a parasite is also
an "idealism" that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be
more "maturity" that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be
able to be an appropriate morality, today because of our world is
not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate
that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google)
and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals,
and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing
the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that
takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take
more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think
that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism,
because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to
be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections
of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears
the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of other ideologies
like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why capitalistic systems are
"conservatism" of there capitalism.
 
More about the essence of morality..
 
We have to be more smart, what is it doing philosophy about
the essence of morality ? it is something really interesting,
and you have seen me doing more philosophy about the essence of
morality, but i was thinking more about philosophy, and i think my
philosophy about the essence of morality makes us understanding the
essence of philosophy in itself ! because by applying yourself at doing
philosophy about morality you will understand more what is philosophy !
understanding what is the essence of political philosophy or philosophy
is something "great" or of a great importance ! now you have to
understand my thinking of philosophy about the essence of morality:
if we say that the essence of morality or what is morality is
that morality is (like was defining it the philosopher Immanuel Kant):
A priori pure moral inferred from reason and it is also empirical moral
inferred from experience, i said that this definition is too much
abstraction, and more than that the goal of my philosophy is also
to find like if morality is more safer ! and since i am a more
serious computer programmer, like programming safety-critical systems,
i was giving also a "high"
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 04 01:01AM -0400

Hello..
 
 
About C++ again..
 
I have just checked CPPCheck here:
 
http://cppcheck.sourceforge.net/
 
 
And this static analyser has the same problem, it doesn't prevent
many "dangerous" implicit operations..
 
And I said before that type-safety of C++ is not good by default:
 
Here is my proof: look at this library that is "trying"(But it is
not yet sufficient) to improve the type-safety of C++:
 
Improve Type Safety in Your C++ Program With the type_safe Library
 
"Features provided by the type_safe library include improved built-in
types (ts::integer, ts::floating_point, and ts::boolean) which prevent
dangerous implicit operations like signed-to-unsigned promotion."
 
Read more here:
 
https://embeddedartistry.com/blog/2018/5/24/improve-type-safety-in-your-c-program-with-the-typesafe-library
 
 
This is why i said before the following:
 
Also I will not waste my time with C++, because from the start C++ was
handicaped, because it has inherited the deficiencies of C, i think C is
"not" a good programming language because it is "too" weakly typed and
it allows implicit type conversions that are bad for reliability etc.
and this looks like the mess of assembler, because C was "too" low level
for reliability, and since C++ has inherited from C, C++ has inherited
this too low level parts that are not good for reliability, so i will
not waste my time with C++ or with C, and i will continu to code in
"modern" Object Pascal of Delphi and FreePascal that is more
conservative because it has a "decent" reliability and a "decent"
performance, and those Delphi and FreePascal compilers are "powerful"
today. And i will also work with "Java", because Mono is not following
fast the developement of C# and it is not as portable as Java.
 
And here is what i wrote about C++ and Delphi and FreePascal and ADA:
 
Energy efficiency isn't just a hardware problem. Your programming
language choices can have serious effects on the efficiency of your
energy consumption. We dive deep into what makes a programming language
energy efficient.
 
As the researchers discovered, the CPU-based energy consumption always
represents the majority of the energy consumed.
 
What Pereira et. al. found wasn't entirely surprising: speed does not
always equate energy efficiency. Compiled languages like C, C++, Rust,
and Ada ranked as some of the most energy efficient languages out there.
 
Read more here:
 
https://jaxenter.com/energy-efficient-programming-languages-137264.html
 
RAM is still expensive and slow, relative to CPUs
 
And "memory" usage efficiency is important for mobile devices.
 
So Delphi and FreePascal compilers are also still "useful" for mobile
devices, because Delphi and FreePascal are good if you are considering
time and memory or energy and memory, and the following pascal benchmark
was done with FreePascal, and the benchmark shows that C, Go and Pascal
do rather better if you're considering languages based on time and
memory or energy and memory.
 
Read again here to notice it:
 
https://jaxenter.com/energy-efficient-programming-languages-137264.html
 
 
Also Delphi is still better for many things, and you have to get more
"technical" to understand it, this is why you have to look at this
following video about Delphi that is more technical:
 
Why are C# Developers choosing Delphi to create Mobile applications
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8ToSr4zOVQ
 
 
And I think there is still a "big" problem with C++ and C..
 
Look at C++ explicit conversion functions, they were introduced in
C++11, but this doesn't come by "default" in C++, like in modern Object
Pascal of Delphi and FreePascal and like in ADA , because in C++ you
have to write explicit conversion functions etc., so this is not good
for reliability in C++, and C++ doesn't by "default" come with range
checking and Run-time checks that catch conversion from negative signed
to unsigned and arithmetic overflow , you have for example to add and
use SafeInt library for that, and C++ doesn't by "default" catch
out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays this is why C++ is
not good for reliability.
 
But Delphi and FreePascal like ADA come with range checking and Run-time
checks that catch conversion from negative signed to unsigned , and
catch out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays and catch
arithmetic overflow etc. and you can also dynamically catch this
exception of ERangeError etc. and they do not allow those bad
implicit type conversions of C++ that are not good for reliability.
 
And you can carefully read the following, it is very important:
 
https://critical.eschertech.com/2010/07/07/run-time-checks-are-they-worth-it/
 
 
And about Escher C++ Verifier, read carefully:
 
"Escher C Verifier enables the development of formally-verifiable
software in a subset of C (based on MISRA-C 2012)."
 
Read here:
 
http://www.eschertech.com/products/index.php
 
 
So it verifies just a "subset" of C, so that's not good for C++
because for other applications that are not a subset of C , it can
not do for example Run-time checks, so we are again into
this problem again that C++ and C don't have range checking and many
Run-time checks, so that's not good in C++ and C because it is not good
for reliability and it is not good for safety-critical systems.
 
 
So for all the reasons above , i think i will stop coding in C++ and
i will quit C++.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 04 12:46AM -0400

Hello,
 
 
Again about Parallel ForEach and ParallelFor..
 
I just wrote this:
 
"I think that this Parallel ForEach and ParallelFor are like futulities,
because they don't bring "enough" high level abstraction to consider
them interesting, because i think my Threadpool with priorities that
scales very well is capable of easily emulating Parallel ForEach with
"priorities" and ParallelFor with "priorities" that scale very well, so
no need to implement Parallel ForEach or Parallel For."
 
 
But to be "nicer", i think i will soon implement both Parallel ForEach
with "priorities" that scales very well and ParallelFor with
"priorities" that scales very well using my Threadpool with priorities
that scales very well, and they will be integrated as methods with my
Threadpool with priorities that scales very well, so that you will be happy.
 
 
So stay tunned !
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 03 11:48PM -0400

Hello,
 
 
I correct a mistake in english, we say "emulating", not simulating
 
Read again my corrected post:
 
 
More about Parallel ForEach and Parallel For..
 
I think i have made a mistake, because i think that this Parallel
ForEach and Parallel For are like futulities, because they don't bring
"enough" high level abstraction to consider them interesting,
because i think my Threadpool with priorities that scales very
well is capable of easily emulating Parallel ForEach with "priorities"
and ParallelFor with "priorities" that scale very well, so no need
to implement Parallel ForEach or Parallel For.
 
 
Here is my powerful Threadpool with priorities that scales very well,
read about it and download it from here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well
 
 
It is a very powerful Threadpool, because:
 
More precision about my efficient Threadpool that scales very well, my
Threadpool is much more scalable than the one of Microsoft, in the
workers side i am using scalable counting networks to distribute on the
many queues or stacks, so it is scalable on the workers side, on the
consumers side i am also using lock striping to be able to scale very
well, so it is scalable on those parts, on the other part that is work
stealing, i am using scalable counting networks, so globally it scales
very well, and since work stealing is "rare" so i think that my
efficient Threadpool that scales very well is really powerful, and it is
much more optimized and the scalable counting networks eliminate false
sharing, and it works with Windows and Linux.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 03 11:35PM -0400

Hello..
 
 
More about Parallel ForEach nad Parallel For..
 
I think i have made a mistake, because i think that this Parallel
ForEach and Parallel For are like futulities, because they don't bring
"enough" high level abstraction to consider them interesting,
because i think my Threadpool with priorities that scales very
well is capable of easily simulating Parallel ForEach with "priorities"
and ParallelFor with "priorities" that scale very well, so no need
to implement Parallel ForEach or Parallel For.
 
 
Here is my powerful Threadpool with priorities that scales very well,
read about it and download it from here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well
 
 
It is a very powerful Threadpool, because:
 
More precision about my efficient Threadpool that scales very well, my
Threadpool is much more scalable than the one of Microsoft, in the
workers side i am using scalable counting networks to distribute on the
many queues or stacks, so it is scalable on the workers side, on the
consumers side i am also using lock striping to be able to scale very
well, so it is scalable on those parts, on the other part that is work
stealing, i am using scalable counting networks, so globally it scales
very well, and since work stealing is "rare" so i think that my
efficient Threadpool that scales very well is really powerful, and it is
much more optimized and the scalable counting networks eliminate false
sharing, and it works with Windows and Linux.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 03 09:27PM -0400

Hello,
 
 
Hope you have read my previous post..
 
About my scalable Parallel ForEach and Parallel For with priorities
that scale very well
 
But i am more smart than that, and i say that Parallel ForEach
and Parallel For are not efficient, because the "indexes" of Parallel
ForEach or Parallel For will not be "visible" to the local functions
that are called by Parallel ForEach or Parallel For, so the "solution"
is that i will enhance my Threadpool with priorities that scales very
well to support calling procedures of Delphi or FreePascal, because my
current Threadpool with priorities that scales very well do support
calling "method' of objects, and since Delphi and FreePascal in the
Delphi mode are powerful since they support local procedures or
functions to global procedures or functions, so supporting calling
"procedures" is "sufficient" to write easily a Parallel ForEach or
Parallel For with priorities that scale very well.
 
Here is my current hreadpool with priorities that scales very well, read
about it and download it from here:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Aug 03 08:38PM -0400

Hello,
 
 
About my Threadpool with priorities that scales very well..
 
I think i will enhanced my following Threadpool with priorities that
scales very well, here it is:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well
 
 
It is a very powerful Threadpool, because:
 
More precision about my efficient Threadpool that scales very well, my
Threadpool is much more scalable than the one of Microsoft, in the
workers side i am using scalable counting networks to distribute on the
many queues or stacks, so it is scalable on the workers side, on the
consumers side i am also using lock striping to be able to scale very
well, so it is scalable on those parts, on the other part that is work
stealing, i am using scalable counting networks, so globally it scales
very well, and since work stealing is "rare" so i think that my
efficient Threadpool that scales very well is really powerful, and it is
much more optimized and the scalable counting networks eliminate false
sharing, and it works with Windows and Linux.
 
So i will enhance my Threadpool to support Parallel ForEach with
"priorities", and you will notice soon that i will implement it smartly
and it will be as it is "scalable" because by the configuration of my
Threadpool work stealing is rare.
 
And i will also add support for "Futures",
 
 
So stay tunned !
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)