- [Modération JNTP] Annulation de <psa0si$1vq$12@dont-email.me> - 3 Updates
- About democracy and morality... - 1 Update
- More about my way of doing.. - 1 Update
- Here is a song that i love much - 1 Update
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Nov 11 08:10PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Nov 11 08:10PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Nov 12 08:37AM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Nov 11 03:33PM -0800 Hello.. Read this: About democracy and morality... You have to read all my following post to understand better: I will now do more political philosophy about democracy and about morality.. As you have noticed i have talked about the essence of morality, and i have proved that morality is Perfection at best by saying the following: === I said in my proof before of: morality is perfection at best, the following: "Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection So that to be able to solve all our problems And be absolute happiness that is the goal But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system" I have to be more precise: When i say: And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good What is it that we call "good" in morality ? A good is like we have to correct or eliminate a defect or flaw , and being morality is wanting to correct or eliminate the defects or flaws so that to attain reliability or flawlessness, because in morality we have to maximize at best the good and minimizing at best the bad, that means also that we have to maximize at best reliability so that to attain flawlessness , and this is called perfection at best since from the following definition: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection perfection is also called freedom from fault or defect that we call: FLAWLESSNESS Also i said above that: "But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system" Now can we ask the following question: How can we measure decent morality ? We can first ask a the following question: How do we measure the truth ? The truth is measured by our our senses and by our smartness and by rationalism and by empiricism ! So i think we can feel the relativeness of truth, i mean that the truth is measured by a reference of measure , but there can be many references of measure that gives different results of truth ! and thus we have to "prioritize" to be able to succeed ! i give you an example: when i said (read below) that decent morality has to be measured by the reference of measure that is perfection at best so that the government enforce more correctly "order", this government needs to prioritize wich of the reference of measures of the truth are more "valid" ! so there is the reference of measure that is happiness or absolute happiness , but since law enforcement of "order" that is of a "highest" priority, so the "truth" of: is it decent morality or not ? must be measured by the reference of measure that is perfection at best in itself so that to say that it is decent morality or not ! so here again you are noticing the relativeness of the truth since the reference of measure is choosen among many and is prioritized ! I will explain more by giving an example: To be able to say that morality that is perfection at best and that is guided by civilization that avoids at best savagery is a decent morality, you have to give weights or a order of priorities to things or processes , you can for example say that "order" is of highest importance and perfection at best is of highest importance and you can say that richness is of a highest importance and you can infer that even if we are somewhat suffering to finally become rich and to be finally order and to be finally perfection at best, we can say that this process is decent morality because it gives results that are of highest importance for us. Also i think that the tendency of today is that morality that is Perfection at best is balancing perfection with our kind of "civilization" so that to not being savagery or desorder. ==== I think that you understand more the essence of morality, but there is still something to say, i said that morality is perfection at best, so now we have to ask the following question: how to avoid "extremism" of perfection that can be dangerous ? i mean that perfection at best can for example give too much importance to "efficiency" and this can become dangerous ! so is my definition of morality that is perfection at best correct or not ? i think that there is no logical contradiction in my definition and it is correct because you have to understand the essence of democracy that is related to morality to understand better ! because we have to look at our "essence" to understand better morality ! because since a great part of the people of the society are more human and they do understand that getting into savagery is "bad" ! so this great part of people of the society does constrain democracy ! since for example the legislative branch or power of the government has to know how to be "moderation" to avoid extremism that hurt the system or that causes violence or/and desorder and/or that causes civil war inside the system ! so this makes us understand that morality that is perfection at best is constrained by democracy so that the "at best" becomes more human or more moderation that is in accordance of our today kind of civilization that, as you have noticed, is balancing perfection with our kind of civilization so that to avoid savagery or desorder. So i hope you have understood my explanation and definition of what is the essence of morality, so i think that we have to be more optimistic about morality. And here is what i wrote about democracy: I think the success of USA has to be that USA has to understand the way USA is governed, take for example the separation of powers, What is the separation of powers? The U.S. Constitution set up three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch, or Congress, makes the law; the executive, led by the president, executes the law; and the judicial, or courts, interprets the law. But we have to be smarter than that, the separation of powers is not "sufficient", so we have to be smarter and know that the legislative branch has to understand how to make the legislative branch successful ! look for example at USA , its congress is constituted with both conservatives and democrats, but this legislative branch has to understand a very important requirement that the legislative branch has to know how to be "moderation" to not cause violence or civil war inside the system ! this is the key to success ! thus the legislative branch of USA has to avoid "extremism" that causes violence or civil war inside the system , so it has to know how to be "moderation" ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Nov 11 11:45AM -0800 Hello... Read this: More about my way of doing.. As you have noticed i am a white arab, i live in Quebec Canada since year 1989. Now if you ask me how i am making "money" so that to be able to live.. You have to understand my way of doing, I have gotten my Diploma in Microelectronics and informatics in 1988, it is not a college level diploma, my Diploma is a university level Diploma, it looks like an Associate degree or the french DEUG. Read here about the Associate degree: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associate_degree And after i have gotten my Diploma , I have also succeeded one year of pure 'mathematics" at the university level of mathematics. So i have studied and succeeded 3 years at the university level.. Now after that i have come to Canada in year 1989 and i have started to study more software computing and to study network administration in Quebec Canada, and after that i have started to work as a network administrator for many years, after that around years 2001 and 2002 i have started to implement some of my softwares like PerlZip that looked like PkZip of PKware software company, but i have implemented it for Perl , and i have implemented the Dynamic Link Libraries of my PerlZip that permits to compress and decompress etc. with the "Delphi" compiler, so my PerlZip software product was very fast and very efficient, in year 2002 i have posted the Beta version on internet, and as a proof , please read about it here: http://computer-programming-forum.com/52-perl-modules/ea157f4a229fc720.htm And after that i have sold the release version of my PerlZip product to many many companies and to many individuals around the world, and i have even sold it to many Banks in Europe, and with that i have made more money. And after that i have started to work like a software developper consultant, the name of my company was and is CyberNT Communications, here it is: Here is my company in Quebec(Canada) called CyberNT Communications, i have worked as a software developer and as a network administrator, read the proof here: https://opencorporates.com/companies/ca_qc/2246777231 And more about the moral contract.. As you have noticed i am a white arab and i just written and posted here a new poem, i have also posted other of my poems , hope you have liked them, other than that you have to understand more my way of doing, i think that building the moral "contract" between me and others is something important, how do you think i am building it? my moral contract with others is like creating one of my "jobs" that has as a goal to convince the others that i am "useful" to society, not only that but i have to be "usefulness" that is more "sophisticated", so this is why you have seen me writing and posting in front of you my "poems", those poems have as a goal to show to others that i am capable of writing beautiful poems, so you are noticing my philosophy by reading my poems, i mean that showing that you are capable of writing beautiful poems is also my philosophy of life that has as a goal to build "confidence" between me and the others, since this confidence that i am building is also like a "glue" that connects me to others, so confidence is really important ! not only that but my moral contract that i am building has also as a goal to show that i am "useful" for the society, not only that but i want also to show that i am more "smart" and that i am more "sophisticated" ! this is all part of my moral contract between me and you that i am building, so as you are noticing i am in accordance with my words and i am more in accordance with morality that is perfection at best (as i have proved it), so as you are noticing that this perfection that we have to be is guided by the today "context" of the society and the context of our world, and by observing this "context" we notice that it needs more efficiency and more sophistication and more professionalism to be capable of "surviving" better and to be able to "transcend" our living conditions, so this is why i am not only writing beautiful poems and posting them here, but i am showing that i am more "professionalism" that is more technical, since i am a more serious computer programmer that has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, look for example at my Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-c-conjugate-gradient-linear-system-solver-library As you have noticed it says the following: "Sparse linear system solvers are ubiquitous in high performance computing (HPC) and often are the most computational intensive parts in scientific computing codes etc." This is why i have "invented" my Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library. Here is another scalable algorithm that i have "invented", read about it and download it from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references So as you are noticing i have "invented" many scalable algorithms and there implementations, and you will find some of them here on my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/ There are other scalable algorithms and there implementations that i have also invented and that i will sell to the following software companies: Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero or to Intel. So as you are noticing "inventing" many scalable algorithms as i am doing is also building the moral contract between me and you and it is also like creating one of my jobs. Read the rest of my thought to understand better: More political philosophy now.. Why do you think i am here to talk to you ? I am a white arab who is building the moral contract between me and you so that to bring "confidence" ! and i have talked about it in some parts of my political philosophy ! so i think that by reading my political philosophy you are feeling more what is the essence of morality ! i love it this way because it is responsability that brings more efficiency that is needed by our democracy ! so all in all as you are noticing i am here to be responsable ! now what about the moral contract ? step by step i am building and explaining my political philosophy to you, my moral contract with you is that i have also to explain that there is a necessary requirement for me, is that i have to know how to play it smartly like playing smartly a game of chess ! and when you are more smart you will have the tendency to know more quickly what is the best way to maximize your success ! this is why you are seeing me talking about the best way to maximize success ! for example you have to know that to be more smart you have to be able in morality to define what is the right "imperfections" that give you the right perfection ! you see ? that's very important to know ! because i am a more serious computer programmer and imperfections like "failing" to be able to be a success is part of a more serious computer programming ! if you are like a "purist" that doesn't want to fail at all in computer programming , that's not efficient ! this is the deficiency of neo-nazism and white supremacism ! they have to know how to be imperfections(it is like being failures) so that to be successful ! but neo-nazism and white supremacism are more like racial "purism" and this purism is inefficient as is inefficient socialism ! other than that we are today more efficient than before ! and democracy is more efficient than before because people are more educated and more experienced today and more aware today than before ! so they are becoming more efficient and this render democracy more efficient ! but can we ask ourselves the following question: is populism of today not in accordance with the fact that we are becoming more efficient ? i don't think this is a logical contradiction because democracy is adapting quickly to the realities and to the necessities of today ! and populism is also becoming more aware of all the advantages of globalization(see the study below that talks about it), so i think that democracy is getting more and more efficient because of that ! also i think that people are becoming more aware of the necessities that the legislative branch or power of the government has to know how to be moderation to avoid extremism that hurts the system ! this is getting better and better , so we have to be positive about politics ! and i think that even Donald Trump is adapting more quickly to the necessities of today. So all in all i think that you are understanding better my political philosophy, so read my following thoughts to understand better: The contrast of diversity.. I think that neo-nazism and white supremacism have a necessary requirement that is "order", also they want to be the right responsability because they want to be a "level" of perfection that is the right perfection for them, i am a white arab and i understand there requirements, but the problem with there philosophy is that it has difficiencies that must be corrected, first since i have proved that morality is perfection at best, and it is inherent to perfection at best that it must respect a certain decency and responsability that our civilization must be an "effort" that avoids at best "savagery", also we notice that the essence of our democracy is that we have to know how to be "moderation" in the legislative power so that to avoid extremism that causes violence and that hurts the system and that can cause a civil war, so i think that white supremacism and neo-nazism are constrained by the actual realities of politics and the necessities of today that i think don't accept neo-nazism and white supremacism because they are too much risk and they are too dangerous for the system, also i have noticed that neo-nazism and white supremacism are racial "purism" that is not what we call efficiency , because i have explained that optimization of today is "prioritizing" to be able to be successful, so if you look at the necessities of immigration of today is that with immigration we want to improve productivity and want to improve economic growth and want to improve the social system and also because of the low birth rate of many western countries, so i don't think that racial purism of neo=nazism and white supremacism is in accordance with morality that is perfection at best as i have proved it, also neo-nazism and white supremacism have the tendency to easily be hateful towards immigrants, but i don't think that this is the right way, because i think that we have first to be the right intellectual effort and be correct realism that permit us to be awareness and that permit us to be capable to think correctly and be capable of solving problems, and i don't think that it is the case of neo-nazism and white supremacism, so i think that neo-nazism and white supremacism have to be reformed to be in accordance with the right efficiency. And I have just released the new version of my Parallel archiver and my Parallel Compression Library, and the Zstandard Dynamic Link Libraries for Windows and the Zstandard Shared Libraries for Linux were updated to the newer versions. You can download them from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-archiver And from: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-compression-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Nov 11 07:23AM -0800 Hello, Read this: Here is a song that i love much, i will share it with you: Demis Roussos - Goodbye, My Love, Goodbye (1973) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UzAl9PqGDM Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment