| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Nov 12 11:32AM -0800 Hello.. Read this: I have also provided you with Lockfree algorithms and there implementations, you can read about them and download them from my website here: Lockfree bounded LIFO stack and FIFO queue https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/lockfree-bounded-lifo-stack-and-fifo-queue Please look inside the zip file, the Lockfree FIFO queue was "corrected" and "enhanced" by Amine Moulay Ramdane (me). Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Nov 12 05:54PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Elephant Man <conanospamic@gmail.com>: Nov 12 05:55PM Article d'annulation émis par un modérateur JNTP via Nemo. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Nov 12 09:55AM -0800 Hello... Read this: Here is a so beautiful music from Greece that i love much that is called Varka sto gyalo, i will share it with you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGCohsSoRM4 Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>: Nov 12 09:05AM -0800 Hello... Read this: I correct more, read about democracy and morality... You have to read all my following post to understand better: I will now do more political philosophy about democracy and about morality.. As you have noticed i have talked about the essence of morality, and i have proved that morality is Perfection at best by saying the following: === I said in my proof before of: morality is perfection at best, the following: "Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection So that to be able to solve all our problems And be absolute happiness that is the goal But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system" I have to be more precise: When i say: And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good What is it that we call "good" in morality ? A good is like we have to correct or eliminate a defect or flaw , and being morality is correcting and eliminating the defects or flaws so that to attain reliability or flawlessness (you have not to read it out of context of my above proof), because in morality we have to maximize at best the good and minimizing at best the bad, that means also that we have to maximize at best reliability so that to attain flawlessness , and this is called perfection at best since from the following definition: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection perfection is also called freedom from fault or defect that we call: FLAWLESSNESS Also i said above that: "But morality of today must at least be a decent morality To avoid desorder and violence inside the system" Now can we ask the following question: How can we measure decent morality ? We can first ask the following question: How do we measure the truth ? The truth is measured by our our senses and by our smartness and by rationalism and by empiricism ! So i think we can feel the relativeness of truth, i mean that the truth is measured by a reference of measure , but there can be many references of measure that gives different results of truth ! and thus we have to "prioritize" to be able to succeed ! i give you an example: when i said (read below) that decent morality has to be measured by the reference of measure that is perfection at best so that the government enforce more correctly "order", this government needs to prioritize wich of the reference of measures of the truth are more "valid" ! so there is the reference of measure that is happiness or absolute happiness , but since law enforcement of "order" that is of a "highest" priority, so the "truth" of: is it decent morality or not ? must be measured by the reference of measure that is perfection at best in itself so that to say that it is decent morality or not ! so here again you are noticing the relativeness of the truth since the reference of measure is choosen among many and is prioritized ! I will explain more by giving an example: To be able to say that morality that is perfection at best and that is guided by civilization that avoids at best savagery is a decent morality, you have to give weights or a order of priorities to things or processes , you can for example say that "order" is of highest importance and perfection at best is of highest importance and you can say that richness is of a highest importance and you can infer that even if we are somewhat suffering to finally become rich and to be finally order and to be finally perfection at best, we can say that this process is decent morality because it gives results that are of highest importance for us. Also i think that the tendency of today is that morality that is Perfection at best is balancing perfection with our kind of "civilization" so that to not being savagery or desorder. ==== I think that you understand more the essence of morality, but there is still something to say, i said that morality is perfection at best, so now we have to ask the following question: how to avoid "extremism" of perfection that can be dangerous ? i mean that perfection at best can for example give too much importance to "efficiency" and this can become dangerous ! so is my definition of morality that is perfection at best correct or not ? i think that there is no logical contradiction in my definition and it is correct because you have to understand the essence of democracy that is related to morality to understand better ! because we have to look at our "essence" to understand better morality ! because since a great part of the people of the society are more human and they do understand that getting into savagery is "bad" ! so this great part of people of the society does constrain democracy ! since for example the legislative branch or power of the government has to know how to be "moderation" to avoid extremism that hurt the system or that causes violence or/and desorder and/or that causes civil war inside the system ! so this makes us understand that morality that is perfection at best is constrained by democracy so that the "at best" becomes more human or more moderation that is in accordance of our today kind of civilization that, as you have noticed, is balancing perfection with our kind of civilization so that to avoid savagery or desorder. So i hope you have understood my explanation and definition of what is the essence of morality, so i think that we have to be more optimistic about morality. And here is what i wrote about democracy: I think the success of USA has to be that USA has to understand the way USA is governed, take for example the separation of powers, What is the separation of powers? The U.S. Constitution set up three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch, or Congress, makes the law; the executive, led by the president, executes the law; and the judicial, or courts, interprets the law. But we have to be smarter than that, the separation of powers is not "sufficient", so we have to be smarter and know that the legislative branch has to understand how to make the legislative branch successful ! look for example at USA , its congress is constituted with both conservatives and democrats, but this legislative branch has to understand a very important requirement that the legislative branch has to know how to be "moderation" to not cause violence or civil war inside the system ! this is the key to success ! thus the legislative branch of USA has to avoid "extremism" that causes violence or civil war inside the system , so it has to know how to be "moderation" ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment