Saturday, January 9, 2021

Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 3 updates in 2 topics

spudisnotyourbud@grumpysods.com: Jan 03 04:23PM

On 2 Jan 2021 19:00:15 GMT
>"why?": as far as I'm concerned, std::array is (since 2011) the
>default tool for fixed-size arrays. It's the /other/ solutions that
>need a motivation.
 
"In my opinion" is not an answer to Why.
spudisnotyourbud@grumpysods.com: Jan 03 04:27PM

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 10:08:44 +1300
 
>Clearly it doesn't. That's why std::array has at().
 
>My point was that std::array is no less efficient that a plain array
>when used as one.
 
And also brings nothing to the table when dealing with fixed sized arrays
where no bounds checking needs to be done except probably binary bloat.
Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid>: Jan 03 06:20PM +0100

On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 10:06:28 -0500, "Rick C. Hodgin" wrote:
 
>and received up into glory where He now sits in all power and authority,
>even holding full power and authority over death, Hell, and the grave.
 
>Thanks to Jesus: "Oh death, where is thy sting?"
 
Marry Christmas, and Happy New Year to all
 
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)