Friday, January 1, 2021

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 3 updates in 3 topics

Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Dec 31 02:59PM -0800

Hello..
 
 
Read again, i correct about more political philosophy about the pleasure of transcending..
 
I was just look at the following video:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbZ1vt9LX4E&list=RDLbZ1vt9LX4E&start_radio=1
 
And notice in the video above that people are getting pleasure by transcending using ideas of a song, those ideas of a song brings them together and they are showing there "satisfaction" of those pleasures of life, so again you are noticing that pleasures of life gives meaning to human existence, since those pleasures of life that give us more happiness are like a beautiful drugs that permit you to go forward towards more and more perfection.

Yet more political philosophy about the meaning of human existence..
 
I said(read below) that the meaning of human existence comes from pleasures of life, pleasures of life like eating a Moroccan Couscous with Seven Vegetables that we call Couscous Bidaoui, so you have to understand that i am a white arab from Morocco living in Canada since year 1989, and here is more of my political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui:
 
Here is the Moroccan Couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui:
 
https://tasteofmaroc.com/moroccan-couscous-with-seven-vegetables/
 
So as you are noticing you have to be smart, so when you look at this
beautiful Moroccan couscous, there is different levels of abstraction,
since you can simply look at it and remember and say that it is a beautiful Moroccan couscous, or you can be more smart and look at
it from a different perspective and from a different level of abstraction and say that this beautiful Moroccan couscous requires Spices that give it the good taste, and when you are smart you will immediately make a logical analogy with political philosophy by saying that those Spices of this beautiful Moroccan couscous make, from the imperfection of a not so good taste, a perfection of a good taste, so you will say that it is the same for humans, since arabs and indians and south americans and such other ethnical groups can also use Spices in a form of good education and awareness so that to reduce by much there
imperfections that give them a not so good taste , so that to be accepted by others, and now you are understanding that it is a good philosophy that calls for proactivity that wants people to have a good education and an awareness, and this is related to my following thoughts on hate, so read them carefully:
 
You have to understand political philosophy, i think political philosophy must be "constructive", but what do i mean by constructive ? you will quickly notice that humans have human imperfections, but when you look at those human imperfection you can start to hate humans and hate our humanity, but this is not the good political philosophy, because you have to distinguish between two things: First, you can look at those human imperfections and hate humans and hate our humanity and then degenerate towards a much more violent system, second, you can look at those human imperfections and say that we have to transcend those human imperfections by being efficiently educated and by being efficiently organized globally and locally and by being efficiently trained and by being efficiently aware and conscious, so what will you choose ? so i think you are quickly understanding that Democracy has to be "proactive" by efficiently educating and by efficiently organizing globally and locally and by efficiently training and by efficiently making aware and conscious so that Democracy works correctly and so that we can transcend our human imperfections, so then i think that you are quickly noticing that it is the way that i am choosing so that to transcend our human imperfections, this is why you
have noticed that i said previously the following:
 
---
I am noticing that people here are quick at hating, notice
that the white supremacist of soc.culture.china newsgroup
called Byker is hating Chinese people and is hating other people
around the world etc. and notice that people are quick at hating people because of there human imperfections, but i think that this is not wise because you can easily hate people and hate our world and hate our humanity, but when you are smart you will notice that you have not to fall into this trap of hating and hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity, because the best way is to be "constructive" and make people educated and aware and efficient so that we reduce much more there imperfections and so that we accept them and so that we don't fall into the trap of hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity. This is why i am talking as i am talking political philosophy.
---
 
 
More political philosophy about: Is there free will?
 
I have just looked at the following new interesting video of Lex Fridman:
 
Lex Fridman is an AI researcher working on autonomous vehicles, human-robot interaction, and machine learning at MIT and beyond.
 
Read more here about him here:
 
https://lexfridman.com/#:~:text=Lex%20Fridman%3A%20I'm%20an,Podcast%3A%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Podcast
 
 
Here is his new video, please look at it carefully:
 
Is there free will? | David Eagleman and Lex Fridman
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f92iPYmiGY
 
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms, and i will now answer the question of: Is there free will?
 
I think that by analysing humans, we can predict with a probability
that this human or that human has a certain "tendency", so it is
like probability, so when we analyse a human, without measuring with IQ tests, we can say that a human has a tendency to be smart, then we can say that there is a high probability that he is smart, so then we can give some probabilistic predictions like that, so we can
proceed by the same methodology for other human tendencies, so then is there any free will ? so i think that since we can not predict some human tendencies with 100% certainty, so we can logically say that the truth is not that humans have no free will. So i think that humans are a composition of free will and not free will.
 
More political philosophy about solidarity and the meaning of human existence...
 
Can we, in philosophy, say that the meaning of human existence comes from solidarity ?
 
When you are smart, you will notice that saying so is not correct, because when you say that it is solidarity, it can become problematic
since solidarity can become perfection that is problematic, so we have
to abstract more correctly than that and say that since human life is not so easy, so the meaning of human existence comes from pleasures of life that make us more happy. This is why i think that i am correct to define it like this, because it "depends" on the conditions of human life, this is why i said the following:
 
More philosophy about what is the purpose and meaning of human existence..
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
So i will ask a philosophical question of:
 
What is the purpose and meaning of human existence?
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that the meaning of human existence
comes from pleasures of life, but you have to understand that so that
to have those pleasures in life you have to know how to "balance" pleasures of life with a level of difficulties of life so that to be perfection, i mean that you have for example to work so that to be perfection that gets you "money" from your work, and you have also to know how to be perfection that creates pleasures in this life that makes
us more happy, this is why i am not in accordance with the philosopher
Albert Camus that said that human life is absurd.
 
Also you have to know about the purpose of life by reading my following
political philosophy about Morality where i am also explaining that
society and morality have to be progressive:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
 
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand:
 
More political about what is the best spirit..
 
I think i am a philosopher, and i think that the best spirit is
the spirit that creates pleasures in life that makes us more happy and this makes us more happy gives meaning to human life,
and you can notice that you have to know how to be solidarity and charity because even solidarity and charity can become pleasures in life, since solidarity and charity can make us more "happy" and this this make us more happy gives meaning to human life, and creating products and services that make us more happy is creating pleasures in life that gives meaning to life, so you are understanding my philosophy (read about it below) this is why i am also creating pleasures in life
by writing my poetry and by for example saying the following in my poetry:
 
--
 
More explanation of my poem of Love below:
 
Notice that i am saying in my poem of Love below the following:
 
"But my beautiful desire for you is "also" always rolling"
 
The "rolling" in my poem of Love below means:
 
Happening like in a steady and continuous way.
 
Read in the following dictionary to notice it:
 
https://www.lexico.com/definition/rolling
 
So here is my new poem of Love that i have just written,
read it listening at the same time at this beautiful song:
 
Cesaria Evora - Mae Velha
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhpAbA78IKM
 
Here is my new poem of Love:
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my beautiful heart is always resisting
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my beautiful love for you is forever staying
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my beautiful desire for you is "also" always rolling
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my love for you is a so beautiful King
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
Like our love is also forever flowing like a beautiful spring
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my love is a beautiful ring around your beautiful angel wings
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my love is a so beautiful offspring
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But our love is like our beautiful God that we are worshiping !
 
---
 
 
More philosophy about how morality is going forward towards more and more perfection..
 
I have just said the following:
 
---------------------------------------------------------------
 
More philosophy about what is the purpose and meaning of human existence..
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
So i will ask a philosophical question of:
 
What is the purpose and meaning of human existence?
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that the meaning of human existence
comes from pleasures of life, but you have to understand that so that
to have those pleasures in life you have to know how to "balance" pleasures of life with a level of difficulties of life so that to be perfection, i mean that you have for example to work so that to be perfection that gets you "money" from your work, and you have also to know how to be perfection that creates pleasures in this life that makes
us more happy, this is why i am not in accordance with the philosopher
Albert Camus that said that human life is absurd.
 
Also you have to know about the purpose of life by reading my following
political philosophy about Morality where i am also explaining that
society and morality have to be progressive:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
 
So as you are noticing we are moving forward towards more and more perfection that also creates pleasures in this life. I give you
an example: look at my following poetry in english and french at how i am creating "pleasures" by perfecting with my smartness so that to bring more happiness:
 
Here is some of my poetry in english:
 
https://www.facebook.com/Poetry-about-Love-and-more-113452413628897
 
And here is some of my poetry in french:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/0AslKfJS9Nw
 
 
 
Read the rest of my previous thoughts:
 
 
More philosophy about what is the purpose and meaning of human existence..
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
So i will ask a philosophical question of:
 
What is the purpose and meaning of human existence?
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that the meaning of human existence
comes from pleasures of life, but you have to understand that so that
to have those pleasures in life you have to know how to "balance" pleasures of life with a level of difficulties of life so that to be perfection, i mean that you have for example to work so that to be perfection that gets you "money" from your work, and you have also to know how to be perfection that creates pleasures in this life that makes
us more happy, this is why i am not in accordance with the philosopher
Albert Camus that said that human life is absurd.
 
Also you have to know about the purpose of life by reading my following
political philosophy about Morality where i am also explaining that
society and morality have to be progressive:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
 
More precision about capitalism and about National Vanguard..
 
I will be more rigorous, so read again:
 
I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
called National Vanguard:
 
Why Capitalism Fails
 
https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/
 
And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:
 
"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn't earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked."
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence:
I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are
like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich).
 
And notice that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".
 
And the above article is saying the following:
 
"Capitalism constantly looks for ways to reduce labor costs. Automation made human labor less necessary than it had been when capitalism first appeared. When automation did appear, people who had the talent, the skills, and the motivation to make contributions began to find no jobs, or to become uncompetitive with mass-production if they tried to employ themselves."
 
I think it is not true, because read the following:
 
https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Dec 31 01:59PM -0800

Hello..
 
 
Yet more political philosophy about the meaning of human existence..
 
I said(read below) that the meaning of human existence comes from pleasures of life, pleasures of life like eating a Moroccan Couscous with Seven Vegetables that we call Couscous Bidaoui, so you have to understand that i am a white arab from Morocco living in Canada since year 1989, and here is more of my political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui:
 
Here is the Moroccan Couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui:
 
https://tasteofmaroc.com/moroccan-couscous-with-seven-vegetables/
 
So as you are noticing you have to be smart, so when you look at this
beautiful Moroccan couscous, there is different levels of abstraction,
since you can simply look at it and remember and say that it is a beautiful Moroccan couscous, or you can be more smart and look at
it from a different perspective and from a different level of abstraction and say that this beautiful Moroccan couscous requires Spices that give it the good taste, and when you are smart you will immediately make a logical analogy with political philosophy by saying that those Spices of this beautiful Moroccan couscous make, from the imperfection of a not so good taste, a perfection of a good taste, so you will say that it is the same for humans, since arabs and indians and south americans and such other ethnical groups can also use Spices in a form of good education and awareness so that to reduce by much there
imperfections that give them a not so good taste , so that to be accepted by others, and now you are understanding that it is a good philosophy that calls for proactivity that wants people to have a good education and an awareness, and this is related to my following thoughts on hate, so read them carefully:
 
You have to understand political philosophy, i think political philosophy must be "constructive", but what do i mean by constructive ? you will quickly notice that humans have human imperfections, but when you look at those human imperfection you can start to hate humans and hate our humanity, but this is not the good political philosophy, because you have to distinguish between two things: First, you can look at those human imperfections and hate humans and hate our humanity and then degenerate towards a much more violent system, second, you can look at those human imperfections and say that we have to transcend those human imperfections by being efficiently educated and by being efficiently organized globally and locally and by being efficiently trained and by being efficiently aware and conscious, so what will you choose ? so i think you are quickly understanding that Democracy has to be "proactive" by efficiently educating and by efficiently organizing globally and locally and by efficiently training and by efficiently making aware and conscious so that Democracy works correctly and so that we can transcend our human imperfections, so then i think that you are quickly noticing that it is the way that i am choosing so that to transcend our human imperfections, this is why you
have noticed that i said previously the following:
 
---
I am noticing that people here are quick at hating, notice
that the white supremacist of soc.culture.china newsgroup
called Byker is hating Chinese people and is hating other people
around the world etc. and notice that people are quick at hating people because of there human imperfections, but i think that this is not wise because you can easily hate people and hate our world and hate our humanity, but when you are smart you will notice that you have not to fall into this trap of hating and hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity, because the best way is to be "constructive" and make people educated and aware and efficient so that we reduce much more there imperfections and so that we accept them and so that we don't fall into the trap of hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity. This is why i am talking as i am talking political philosophy.
---
 
 
More political philosophy about: Is there free will?
 
I have just looked at the following new interesting video of Lex Fridman:
 
Lex Fridman is an AI researcher working on autonomous vehicles, human-robot interaction, and machine learning at MIT and beyond.
 
Read more here about him here:
 
https://lexfridman.com/#:~:text=Lex%20Fridman%3A%20I'm%20an,Podcast%3A%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Podcast
 
 
Here is his new video, please look at it carefully:
 
Is there free will? | David Eagleman and Lex Fridman
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f92iPYmiGY
 
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms, and i will now answer the question of: Is there free will?
 
I think that by analysing humans, we can predict with a probability
that this human or that human has a certain "tendency", so it is
like probability, so when we analyse a human, without measuring with IQ tests, we can say that a human has a tendency to be smart, then we can say that there is a high probability that he is smart, so then we can give some probabilistic predictions like that, so we can
proceed by the same methodology for other human tendencies, so then is there any free will ? so i think that since we can not predict some human tendencies with 100% certainty, so we can logically say that the truth is not that humans have no free will. So i think that humans are a composition of free will and not free will.
 
More political philosophy about solidarity and the meaning of human existence...
 
Can we, in philosophy, say that the meaning of human existence comes from solidarity ?
 
When you are smart, you will notice that saying so is not correct, because when you say that it is solidarity, it can become problematic
since solidarity can become perfection that is problematic, so we have
to abstract more correctly than that and say that since human life is not so easy, so the meaning of human existence comes from pleasures of life that make us more happy. This is why i think that i am correct to define it like this, because it "depends" on the conditions of human life, this is why i said the following:
 
More philosophy about what is the purpose and meaning of human existence..
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
So i will ask a philosophical question of:
 
What is the purpose and meaning of human existence?
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that the meaning of human existence
comes from pleasures of life, but you have to understand that so that
to have those pleasures in life you have to know how to "balance" pleasures of life with a level of difficulties of life so that to be perfection, i mean that you have for example to work so that to be perfection that gets you "money" from your work, and you have also to know how to be perfection that creates pleasures in this life that makes
us more happy, this is why i am not in accordance with the philosopher
Albert Camus that said that human life is absurd.
 
Also you have to know about the purpose of life by reading my following
political philosophy about Morality where i am also explaining that
society and morality have to be progressive:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
 
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand:
 
More political about what is the best spirit..
 
I think i am a philosopher, and i think that the best spirit is
the spirit that creates pleasures in life that makes us more happy and this makes us more happy gives meaning to human life,
and you can notice that you have to know how to be solidarity and charity because even solidarity and charity can become pleasures in life, since solidarity and charity can make us more "happy" and this this make us more happy gives meaning to human life, and creating products and services that make us more happy is creating pleasures in life that gives meaning to life, so you are understanding my philosophy (read about it below) this is why i am also creating pleasures in life
by writing my poetry and by for example saying the following in my poetry:
 
--
 
More explanation of my poem of Love below:
 
Notice that i am saying in my poem of Love below the following:
 
"But my beautiful desire for you is "also" always rolling"
 
The "rolling" in my poem of Love below means:
 
Happening like in a steady and continuous way.
 
Read in the following dictionary to notice it:
 
https://www.lexico.com/definition/rolling
 
So here is my new poem of Love that i have just written,
read it listening at the same time at this beautiful song:
 
Cesaria Evora - Mae Velha
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhpAbA78IKM
 
Here is my new poem of Love:
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my beautiful heart is always resisting
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my beautiful love for you is forever staying
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my beautiful desire for you is "also" always rolling
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my love for you is a so beautiful King
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
Like our love is also forever flowing like a beautiful spring
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my love is a beautiful ring around your beautiful angel wings
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my love is a so beautiful offspring
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But our love is like our beautiful God that we are worshiping !
 
---
 
 
More philosophy about how morality is going forward towards more and more perfection..
 
I have just said the following:
 
---------------------------------------------------------------
 
More philosophy about what is the purpose and meaning of human existence..
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
So i will ask a philosophical question of:
 
What is the purpose and meaning of human existence?
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that the meaning of human existence
comes from pleasures of life, but you have to understand that so that
to have those pleasures in life you have to know how to "balance" pleasures of life with a level of difficulties of life so that to be perfection, i mean that you have for example to work so that to be perfection that gets you "money" from your work, and you have also to know how to be perfection that creates pleasures in this life that makes
us more happy, this is why i am not in accordance with the philosopher
Albert Camus that said that human life is absurd.
 
Also you have to know about the purpose of life by reading my following
political philosophy about Morality where i am also explaining that
society and morality have to be progressive:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
 
So as you are noticing we are moving forward towards more and more perfection that also creates pleasures in this life. I give you
an example: look at my following poetry in english and french at how i am creating "pleasures" by perfecting with my smartness so that to bring more happiness:
 
Here is some of my poetry in english:
 
https://www.facebook.com/Poetry-about-Love-and-more-113452413628897
 
And here is some of my poetry in french:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/0AslKfJS9Nw
 
 
 
Read the rest of my previous thoughts:
 
 
More philosophy about what is the purpose and meaning of human existence..
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
So i will ask a philosophical question of:
 
What is the purpose and meaning of human existence?
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that the meaning of human existence
comes from pleasures of life, but you have to understand that so that
to have those pleasures in life you have to know how to "balance" pleasures of life with a level of difficulties of life so that to be perfection, i mean that you have for example to work so that to be perfection that gets you "money" from your work, and you have also to know how to be perfection that creates pleasures in this life that makes
us more happy, this is why i am not in accordance with the philosopher
Albert Camus that said that human life is absurd.
 
Also you have to know about the purpose of life by reading my following
political philosophy about Morality where i am also explaining that
society and morality have to be progressive:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
 
More precision about capitalism and about National Vanguard..
 
I will be more rigorous, so read again:
 
I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
called National Vanguard:
 
Why Capitalism Fails
 
https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/
 
And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:
 
"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn't earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked."
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence:
I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are
like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich).
 
And notice that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".
 
And the above article is saying the following:
 
"Capitalism constantly looks for ways to reduce labor costs. Automation made human labor less necessary than it had been when capitalism first appeared. When automation did appear, people who had the talent, the skills, and the motivation to make contributions began to find no jobs, or to become uncompetitive with mass-production if they tried to employ themselves."
 
I think it is not true, because read the following:
 
https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/
 
And read the following:
 
Here is the advantages and disadvantages of automation:
 
Following are some of the advantages of automation:
 
1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.
 
2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker.
 
3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It
has been estimated that the cost to machine
Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Dec 31 01:02PM -0800

Hello..
 
 
More political philosophy about solidarity and the meaning of human existence...
 
Can we, in philosophy, say that the meaning of human existence comes from solidarity ?
 
When you are smart, you will notice that saying so is not correct, because when you say that it is solidarity, it can become problematic
since solidarity can become perfection that is problematic, so we have
to abstract more correctly than that and say that since human life is not so easy, so the meaning of human existence comes from pleasures of life that make us more happy. This is why i think that i am correct to define it like this, because it "depends" on the conditions of human life, this is why i said the following:
 
More philosophy about what is the purpose and meaning of human existence..
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
So i will ask a philosophical question of:
 
What is the purpose and meaning of human existence?
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that the meaning of human existence
comes from pleasures of life, but you have to understand that so that
to have those pleasures in life you have to know how to "balance" pleasures of life with a level of difficulties of life so that to be perfection, i mean that you have for example to work so that to be perfection that gets you "money" from your work, and you have also to know how to be perfection that creates pleasures in this life that makes
us more happy, this is why i am not in accordance with the philosopher
Albert Camus that said that human life is absurd.
 
Also you have to know about the purpose of life by reading my following
political philosophy about Morality where i am also explaining that
society and morality have to be progressive:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
 
 
Read the rest of my thoughts to understand:
 
More political about what is the best spirit..
 
I think i am a philosopher, and i think that the best spirit is
the spirit that creates pleasures in life that makes us more happy and this makes us more happy gives meaning to human life,
and you can notice that you have to know how to be solidarity and charity because even solidarity and charity can become pleasures in life, since solidarity and charity can make us more "happy" and this this make us more happy gives meaning to human life, and creating products and services that make us more happy is creating pleasures in life that gives meaning to life, so you are understanding my philosophy (read about it below) this is why i am also creating pleasures in life
by writing my poetry and by for example saying the following in my poetry:
 
--
 
More explanation of my poem of Love below:
 
Notice that i am saying in my poem of Love below the following:
 
"But my beautiful desire for you is "also" always rolling"
 
The "rolling" in my poem of Love below means:
 
Happening like in a steady and continuous way.
 
Read in the following dictionary to notice it:
 
https://www.lexico.com/definition/rolling
 
So here is my new poem of Love that i have just written,
read it listening at the same time at this beautiful song:
 
Cesaria Evora - Mae Velha
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhpAbA78IKM
 
Here is my new poem of Love:
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my beautiful heart is always resisting
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my beautiful love for you is forever staying
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my beautiful desire for you is "also" always rolling
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my love for you is a so beautiful King
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
Like our love is also forever flowing like a beautiful spring
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my love is a beautiful ring around your beautiful angel wings
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But my love is a so beautiful offspring
 
Time is flowing and walking and running
 
But our love is like our beautiful God that we are worshiping !
 
---
 
 
More philosophy about how morality is going forward towards more and more perfection..
 
I have just said the following:
 
---------------------------------------------------------------
 
More philosophy about what is the purpose and meaning of human existence..
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
So i will ask a philosophical question of:
 
What is the purpose and meaning of human existence?
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that the meaning of human existence
comes from pleasures of life, but you have to understand that so that
to have those pleasures in life you have to know how to "balance" pleasures of life with a level of difficulties of life so that to be perfection, i mean that you have for example to work so that to be perfection that gets you "money" from your work, and you have also to know how to be perfection that creates pleasures in this life that makes
us more happy, this is why i am not in accordance with the philosopher
Albert Camus that said that human life is absurd.
 
Also you have to know about the purpose of life by reading my following
political philosophy about Morality where i am also explaining that
society and morality have to be progressive:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
 
So as you are noticing we are moving forward towards more and more perfection that also creates pleasures in this life. I give you
an example: look at my following poetry in english and french at how i am creating "pleasures" by perfecting with my smartness so that to bring more happiness:
 
Here is some of my poetry in english:
 
https://www.facebook.com/Poetry-about-Love-and-more-113452413628897
 
And here is some of my poetry in french:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/0AslKfJS9Nw
 
 
 
Read the rest of my previous thoughts:
 
 
More philosophy about what is the purpose and meaning of human existence..
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
 
So i will ask a philosophical question of:
 
What is the purpose and meaning of human existence?
 
I think i am smart, and i will say that the meaning of human existence
comes from pleasures of life, but you have to understand that so that
to have those pleasures in life you have to know how to "balance" pleasures of life with a level of difficulties of life so that to be perfection, i mean that you have for example to work so that to be perfection that gets you "money" from your work, and you have also to know how to be perfection that creates pleasures in this life that makes
us more happy, this is why i am not in accordance with the philosopher
Albert Camus that said that human life is absurd.
 
Also you have to know about the purpose of life by reading my following
political philosophy about Morality where i am also explaining that
society and morality have to be progressive:
 
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
 
More precision about capitalism and about National Vanguard..
 
I will be more rigorous, so read again:
 
I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
called National Vanguard:
 
Why Capitalism Fails
 
https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/
 
And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:
 
"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn't earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked."
 
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence:
I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are
like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich).
 
And notice that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".
 
And the above article is saying the following:
 
"Capitalism constantly looks for ways to reduce labor costs. Automation made human labor less necessary than it had been when capitalism first appeared. When automation did appear, people who had the talent, the skills, and the motivation to make contributions began to find no jobs, or to become uncompetitive with mass-production if they tried to employ themselves."
 
I think it is not true, because read the following:
 
https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/
 
And read the following:
 
Here is the advantages and disadvantages of automation:
 
Following are some of the advantages of automation:
 
1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.
 
2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker.
 
3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It
has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by
conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may
be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated
mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many
examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have
significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour
TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers).
 
4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment
opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry,
as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment
Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created.
These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these
companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other
needed to use and operate the computers.
 
5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only
through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of
production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage
increases without a commensurate increase in productivity
will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to
increase productivity.
 
Following are some of the disadvantages of automation:
 
1. Automation will result in the subjugation of the human being by a
machine. Automation tends to transfer the skill required to perform work
from human operators to machines. In so doing, it reduces the need for
skilled labour. The manual work left by automation requires lower skill
levels and tends to involve rather menial tasks (e.g., loading and
unloading workpart, changing tools, removing chips, etc.). In this
sense, automation tends to downgrade factory work.
 
2. There will be a reduction in the labour force, with resulting
unemployment. It is logical to argue that the immediate effect of
automation will be to reduce the need for human labour, thus displacing
workers.
 
3. Automation will reduce purchasing power. As machines replace workers
and these workers join the unemployment ranks, they will not receive the
wages necessary to buy the products brought by automation. Markets will
become saturated with products that people cannot afford to purchase.
Inventories will grow. Production will stop. Unemployment will reach
epidemic proportions and the result will be a massive economic depression.
 
And to know more about economy and capitalism, please read my following thoughts:
 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/wlJu5j1xhPk
 
 
And more political philosophy about the good taste..
 
So let us look in the dictionary at what is the taste, it says the following:
 
"The taste is the sense by which the qualities and flavour of a substance are distinguished by the taste buds."
 
Read here in the dictionary to notice it:
 
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/taste
 
But when you are smart you will also notice that there is also
the intellectual taste from culture or genetics, i mean that
when you are genetically more rational and more smart you will notice that this more rational and more smart is also intellectual taste since with it you are able to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality, and this is also the same for culture, i mean when you enhance more your culture it enhances your intellectual taste and it permits you to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality.
 
So as you are noticing that the intellectual taste is so important..
 
And you have to also know that i am also doing political philosophy by
efficiently finding the patterns with my smartness, i give you an example, look at the following pattern that i am finding with my smartness:
 
--
 
More explanation about the rule of "work smart and not hard"..
 
I will be more logically rigorous and explain more, so read my logical proof:
 
I have just looked at the following video, i invite you to look at it:
 
People who say "work smart not hard" pretty much always fail | James Gosling and Lex Fridman
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jaho2mbaVGM&t=99s
 
Here is James Gosling:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Gosling
 
And here is Lex Fridman:
 
https://lexfridman.com/#:~:text=Lex%20Fridman%3A%20I'm%20an,Teaching%3A%20deeplearning.mit.edu
 
 
I think i am a white arab that is smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms and i say that Lex Fridman and James Gosling in the above video are not smart by saying that "work smart and not hard" pretty much always fail, and notice that Lex Fridman says that
the "not hard" in the rule means lazy, but this is not logically correct, since if the statistical distribution of the strenght and force of the work is normal in the real world , so i have to discern with my fluid intelligence that it is a system that means "work smart and not hard" and it can mean: "work smart and using an average force or strenght", so then it means that this system or rule doesn't pretty much always fail, also we can generalize and say: since the truth of "work smart and not hard pretty much always fail" depends on the statistical distribution(of the strenght and force of the work) in the real world, so we can not generalize and say that the rule of "work smart and not hard" pretty much always fail.
 
--
 
I give you another example, look at the following patterns that
i am finding with my smartness:
 
---
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No comments: