Monday, January 4, 2021

Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 7 updates in 3 topics

Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk>: Jan 04 09:02PM

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 17:14:35 -0800
"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:
[crap snipped]
> Did you try to talk to 200 people in the store? Or, were you just
> looking at their eyes?
 
Chris, I don't know why you keep doing this, but please shut the fuck
up. This guy doesn't need useful idiots.
gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack): Jan 04 10:15PM

In article <20210104210237.a4a63c422f55ccb848d828da@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk>,
>> looking at their eyes?
 
>Chris, I don't know why you keep doing this, but please shut the fuck
>up. This guy doesn't need useful idiots.
 
Chris, I don't know why you keep doing this, but please shut the fuck
up. This guy doesn't need useful idiots.
 
--
Every time a Republican gets caught doing something illegal (i.e., just about every
day or two), they always immediately issue two simultaneous statements about it:
1) "I didn't do it" (Standard denial, which of course only cult-members pay any attention to)
2) "Here's how I did it and why I did it and why it shouldn't matter to you and why you should go back to watching sports on TV"
"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Jan 04 02:33PM -0800

On 1/4/2021 1:02 PM, Chris Vine wrote:
>> looking at their eyes?
 
> Chris, I don't know why you keep doing this, but please shut the fuck
> up. This guy doesn't need useful idiots.
 
Yeah... It is idiotic to converse with him. I have a problem. Damn. For
some reason, he has a fairly strong ability to get my goat, so to speak.
Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.REMOVETHISBIT.co.uk>: Jan 04 10:43PM

On 04/01/2021 17:36, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On 1/4/21 12:25 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> And Satan invented fossils, yes?
 
> And Satan's convinced his people to be mindless gainsayers, yes?
 
And Satan invented fossils, yes? Spammer?
 
[snip - tl;dr]
 
/Flibble
 
--
😎
"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Jan 04 02:43PM -0800

On 1/4/2021 2:15 PM, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>> up. This guy doesn't need useful idiots.
 
> Chris, I don't know why you keep doing this, but please shut the fuck
> up. This guy doesn't need useful idiots.
 
Yikes! Your right. He gets me mad, then I respond using highly sarcastic
and loaded questions/comments and ruin myself in the process! God damn it.
Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org>: Jan 04 07:00PM +0100

Am 04.01.21 um 17:24 schrieb Scott Lurndal:
> I wish that the regulars in this group would simply add BW and RCH to
> their killfiles and stop responding to their nonsense. Resist the
> temptation, please.
 
Adjust /your/ killfile. => Ignore sub thread instead of just ignore.
 
 
Marcel
"Öö Tiib" <ootiib@hot.ee>: Jan 04 09:50AM -0800

On Monday, 4 January 2021 at 09:13:47 UTC+2, Juha Nieminen wrote:
> > it and want others to have same pain. IOW sadism of pathetic asshole.
> If you need a two-dimensional array, is it guaranteed that there will be no
> padding between the sub-arrays?
 
No, implementation may have more members at end of std::array
for example for debugging/trapping or whatever. So those elements may be
between sub-arrays oft that larger array. If you need guarantees about
size of standard layout class then always check it.

static_assert(sizeof(std::array<uint8_t,6>) == 6);
 
Check it about whatever standard layout type whose size matters as just
plain enum without underlying type specified may have different size
from platform to platform.
 
> With inbuilt arrays there is such a guarantee.
 
It is possibly beneficial for some case. If you really have that case then use
raw array indeed. But I would like to see performance issue reported first.
Programmers waste sometimes time pointlessly without benefit.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No comments: