- To Joe From SenderX, or Chris Thomasson... ;^) - 1 Update
- Read again about more philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism.. - 1 Update
- More philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism.. - 1 Update
- More philosophy about wich city is better ? - 1 Update
- More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more.. - 1 Update
- More philosophy about the secret of life.. - 1 Update
| Chris Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>: Jan 29 09:50PM -0800 Are you still hanging in there Joe? PDR forever.... ;^) Just reminiscing about comp.programming.threads. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jan 29 06:00PM -0800 Hello... Read again about more philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism.. I invite you to look at the following video of Dieudonné that shows that being a president that is an engineer is not sufficient, since we have also to be the right philosophy, and we have also to know how to think philosophically, and being able to be this thinking philosophically needs being able of being psychology with people, so i invite you to look at the following video to notice: Dieudonné - le président africain https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJxty9sJUAc So as you have just noticed my today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism. So the first philosophical question is how to talk about those above ideologies? I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following: Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge to the optimal and global maximum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local optimization and lack of global optimization , so it is by logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following: Read the following article about economic nationalism: Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/ Notice that it says the following: "Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries for their economic and political and national security well being. When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad policy." So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do. This is why i also said the following: More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism.. I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism, so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of the far-right political party in France: Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i think that this new model is better because it is more efficient , because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition. USA FBI motto is Fidelity , Bravery and and Integrity.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video about USA FBI: Learn more about FBI special Agents https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nt4xevmGo2I I think that FBI wants "order", and i think that in philosophy knowing how to be order is so important, and order can be considered pleasure of life, read my following part of my philosophy about order and respect so that to understand it: More philosophy about order and respect.. I have just read the following about the importance of respect for a society. i invite you to read it: https://steemit.com/sndbox/@teachblogger/the-importance-of-respect-for-a-society So read my following thoughts so that to understand more about respect and order: Note: I am saying below the following: "and order and respect can be considered pleasures of life", and the "can" indicates possibility. More philosophy about the traditional Japanese lifestyle.. So look carefully at the following video of everyday life in bygone days in Tokyo in year 1966: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvoZjbp9R1w I am a white arab and i think i am smart, and when i just looked at the above video , i have just detected an important "pattern" with my fluid intelligence, and it is that Japanese of year 1966 were people that were apt at knowing how to appreciate simple pleasures of life and how to appreciate order, so then they were knowing how to be respect too so that to be order, and order and respect can be considered pleasures of life, so i think that they were happy people, and knowing how to appreciate simple pleasures of life like were doing the Japanese of year 1966 is a very important rule in philosophy because it avoids disorder in a society, the second rule in philosophy that avoids disorder in a society is that you have to know how to be the "effort" of being order and responsability. More about my philosophy and about buddhism.. I think i am smart, so i will make you understand my philosophy correctly, so look at the following song of Michael Jackson: Michael Jackson - Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough (Official Video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yURRmWtbTbo You will quickly notice by looking at the above video and by knowing more about Michael Jackson, that he was a drug addict of pleasures of life, and you have to understand what it means, since i mean that he didn't know how to control correctly himself by being this drug addict of pleasures of life, so we call it in french: "L'emprise des plaisirs de la vie sur une personne qui le rendent mentalement défectueux", and my translation in english is: "The grip of the pleasures of life on a person that make him mentally defective", so my philosophy is not buddhism since you notice that it doesn't say that you have not to be rich, since in my philosophy you can be rich and you have to know how to be sophisticated, but the very important thing of my philosophy is that it also learns a person how to survive and be happy with simple pleasures of life, so that he can control himself correctly such as when he is rich. So look at the following american dream of Micheal Jackson and you will notice that Micheal Jackson has died of a Drug Overdose even if he has been very rich or he was rich, so i think he was a person that didn't know how to appreciate simple pleasures of life, so he was not a happy person even if he was very rich. Look at the following video to notice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R73DZkM9X6U Read the rest of my thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand: More philosophy about wich city is better ? I invite you to look at the following video: Tel Aviv Travel Guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWPJxbdRFZk I think that Tel Aviv is a beautiful city with a beach and with many sunny days where you can live.. But i think i am a philosopher and i will talk about Montreal: I am living in Montreal city in Canada, and i think that Montreal is so beautiful city even if it is very cold in winter, since i think that this very cold of the winter of Montreal is like my philosophy, since it learns you how to "appreciate" simple pleasures of life, so it makes you happy, so then you have to be convinced of my philosophy (so read it below), and this very cold winter of Montreal learns you how to smartly adapt to this very cold winter of Montreal , so you have to be smart and be able to see how Montreal is so beautiful, so i invite you to look at the following video of a song about Montreal, so look in this video of this song how the Montreal winter is also beautiful: Robert Charlebois - Je reviendrai à Montréal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4NXUo8qipM So i am happy living in Montreal.. And i invite you to listen at the beautiful song above reading at the same time my following poems in french: https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/0AslKfJS9Nw And here is my thoughts of my political philosophy: More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and when you are smart you will easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data, also PathNET is much more powerful since also it is higher level abstraction in artificial intelligence.. Read about it here: https://mattturck.com/frontierai/ And read about PathNet here: https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46 More about artificial intelligence.. I think one of the most important part in artificial intelligence is reasoning with energy minimization, it is the one that i am working on right now, see the following video to understand more about it: Yann LeCun: Can Neural Networks Reason? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfwNEY826I&t=250s I think that since i have just understood much more artificial intelligence, i will soon show you my next Open source software project that implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO, and i will write an article that explain much more artificial intelligence and what is smartness and what is consciousness and self-awareness.. And in only one day i have just learned "much" more artificial intelligence, i have read the following article about Particle Swarm Optimization and i have understood it: Artificial Intelligence - Particle Swarm Optimization https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization But i have just noticed that the above implementation doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence. So here is how to guarantee the optimal convergence in PSO: Clerc and Kennedy in (Trelea 2003) propose a constriction coefficient parameter selection guidelines in order to guarantee the optimal convergence, here is how to do it with PSO: v(t+1) = k*[(v(t) + (c1 * r1 * (p(t) – x(t)) + (c2 * r2 * (g(t) – x(t))] x(t+1) = x(t) + v(t+1) constriction coefficient parameter is: k = 2/abs(2-phi-sqrt(phi^2-(4*phi))) k:=2/abs((2-4.1)-(0.640)) = 0.729 phi = c1 + c2 To guarantee the optimal convergence use: c1 = c2 = 2.05 phi = 4.1 => k equal to 0.729 w=0.7298 Population size = 60; Also i have noticed that GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and SA(Simulated annealing) and Hill Climbing are much less powerful since they perform only exploitation. In general, any metaheuristic should perform two main searching capabilities (Exploration and Exploitation). Population based algorithms ( or many solutions ) such as GA, PSO, ACO, or ABC, performs both Exploration and Exploitation, while Single-Based Algorithm such as SA(Simulated annealing), Hill Climbing, performs the exploitation only. In this case, more exploitation and less exploration increases the chances for trapping in local optima. Because the algorithm does not have the ability to search in another position far from the current best solution ( which is Exploration). Simulated annealing starts in one valley and typically ends in the lowest point of the same valley. Whereas swarms start in many different places of the mountain range and are searching for |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jan 29 05:45PM -0800 Hello.. More philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism.. I invite you to look at the following video of Dieudonné that shows that being a president that is an engineer is not sufficient, since we have also to be the right philosophy, and we have also to know how to think philosophically, and being able to be this thinking philosophically needs being able of being psychology with people, so i invite you to look at the following video to notice: Dieudonné - le président africain https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJxty9sJUAc So as you have just noticed my today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the far-right and nationalism. So the first philosophical question is how to talk about those above ideologies? I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mesa IQ test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following: Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge to the optimal and global maximum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local optimization and lack of global optimization , so it is by logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following: Read the following article about economic nationalism: Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/ Notice that it says the following: "Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries for their economic and political and national security well being. When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad policy." So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do. This is why i also said the following: More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism.. I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism, so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of the far-right political party in France: Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i think that this new model is better because it is more efficient , because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition. USA FBI motto is Fidelity , Bravery and and Integrity.. I invite you to look at the following interesting video about USA FBI: Learn more about FBI special Agents https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nt4xevmGo2I I think that FBI wants "order", and i think that in philosophy knowing how to be order is so important, and order can be considered pleasure of life, read my following part of my philosophy about order and respect so that to understand it: More philosophy about order and respect.. I have just read the following about the importance of respect for a society. i invite you to read it: https://steemit.com/sndbox/@teachblogger/the-importance-of-respect-for-a-society So read my following thoughts so that to understand more about respect and order: Note: I am saying below the following: "and order and respect can be considered pleasures of life", and the "can" indicates possibility. More philosophy about the traditional Japanese lifestyle.. So look carefully at the following video of everyday life in bygone days in Tokyo in year 1966: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvoZjbp9R1w I am a white arab and i think i am smart, and when i just looked at the above video , i have just detected an important "pattern" with my fluid intelligence, and it is that Japanese of year 1966 were people that were apt at knowing how to appreciate simple pleasures of life and how to appreciate order, so then they were knowing how to be respect too so that to be order, and order and respect can be considered pleasures of life, so i think that they were happy people, and knowing how to appreciate simple pleasures of life like were doing the Japanese of year 1966 is a very important rule in philosophy because it avoids disorder in a society, the second rule in philosophy that avoids disorder in a society is that you have to know how to be the "effort" of being order and responsability. More about my philosophy and about buddhism.. I think i am smart, so i will make you understand my philosophy correctly, so look at the following song of Michael Jackson: Michael Jackson - Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough (Official Video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yURRmWtbTbo You will quickly notice by looking at the above video and by knowing more about Michael Jackson, that he was a drug addict of pleasures of life, and you have to understand what it means, since i mean that he didn't know how to control correctly himself by being this drug addict of pleasures of life, so we call it in french: "L'emprise des plaisirs de la vie sur une personne qui le rendent mentalement défectueux", and my translation in english is: "The grip of the pleasures of life on a person that make him mentally defective", so my philosophy is not buddhism since you notice that it doesn't say that you have not to be rich, since in my philosophy you can be rich and you have to know how to be sophisticated, but the very important thing of my philosophy is that it also learns a person how to survive and be happy with simple pleasures of life, so that he can control himself correctly such as when he is rich. So look at the following american dream of Micheal Jackson and you will notice that Micheal Jackson has died of a Drug Overdose even if he has been very rich or he was rich, so i think he was a person that didn't know how to appreciate simple pleasures of life, so he was not a happy person even if he was very rich. Look at the following video to notice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R73DZkM9X6U Read the rest of my thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand: More philosophy about wich city is better ? I invite you to look at the following video: Tel Aviv Travel Guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWPJxbdRFZk I think that Tel Aviv is a beautiful city with a beach and with many sunny days where you can live.. But i think i am a philosopher and i will talk about Montreal: I am living in Montreal city in Canada, and i think that Montreal is so beautiful city even if it is very cold in winter, since i think that this very cold of the winter of Montreal is like my philosophy, since it learns you how to "appreciate" simple pleasures of life, so it makes you happy, so then you have to be convinced of my philosophy (so read it below), and this very cold winter of Montreal learns you how to smartly adapt to this very cold winter of Montreal , so you have to be smart and be able to see how Montreal is so beautiful, so i invite you to look at the following video of a song about Montreal, so look in this video of this song how the Montreal winter is also beautiful: Robert Charlebois - Je reviendrai à Montréal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4NXUo8qipM So i am happy living in Montreal.. And i invite you to listen at the beautiful song above reading at the same time my following poems in french: https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/0AslKfJS9Nw And here is my thoughts of my political philosophy: More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and when you are smart you will easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data, also PathNET is much more powerful since also it is higher level abstraction in artificial intelligence.. Read about it here: https://mattturck.com/frontierai/ And read about PathNet here: https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46 More about artificial intelligence.. I think one of the most important part in artificial intelligence is reasoning with energy minimization, it is the one that i am working on right now, see the following video to understand more about it: Yann LeCun: Can Neural Networks Reason? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfwNEY826I&t=250s I think that since i have just understood much more artificial intelligence, i will soon show you my next Open source software project that implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO, and i will write an article that explain much more artificial intelligence and what is smartness and what is consciousness and self-awareness.. And in only one day i have just learned "much" more artificial intelligence, i have read the following article about Particle Swarm Optimization and i have understood it: Artificial Intelligence - Particle Swarm Optimization https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization But i have just noticed that the above implementation doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence. So here is how to guarantee the optimal convergence in PSO: Clerc and Kennedy in (Trelea 2003) propose a constriction coefficient parameter selection guidelines in order to guarantee the optimal convergence, here is how to do it with PSO: v(t+1) = k*[(v(t) + (c1 * r1 * (p(t) – x(t)) + (c2 * r2 * (g(t) – x(t))] x(t+1) = x(t) + v(t+1) constriction coefficient parameter is: k = 2/abs(2-phi-sqrt(phi^2-(4*phi))) k:=2/abs((2-4.1)-(0.640)) = 0.729 phi = c1 + c2 To guarantee the optimal convergence use: c1 = c2 = 2.05 phi = 4.1 => k equal to 0.729 w=0.7298 Population size = 60; Also i have noticed that GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and SA(Simulated annealing) and Hill Climbing are much less powerful since they perform only exploitation. In general, any metaheuristic should perform two main searching capabilities (Exploration and Exploitation). Population based algorithms ( or many solutions ) such as GA, PSO, ACO, or ABC, performs both Exploration and Exploitation, while Single-Based Algorithm such as SA(Simulated annealing), Hill Climbing, performs the exploitation only. In this case, more exploitation and less exploration increases the chances for trapping in local optima. Because the algorithm does not have the ability to search in another position far from the current best solution ( which is Exploration). Simulated annealing starts in one valley and typically ends in the lowest point of the same valley. Whereas swarms start in many different places of the mountain range and are searching for the lowest point in |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jan 29 01:09PM -0800 Hello.. More philosophy about wich city is better ? I invite you to look at the following video: Tel Aviv Travel Guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWPJxbdRFZk I think that Tel Aviv is a beautiful city with a beach and with many sunny days where you can live.. But i think i am a philosopher and i will talk about Montreal: I am living in Montreal city in Canada, and i think that Montreal is so beautiful city even if it is very cold in winter, since i think that this very cold of the winter of Montreal is like my philosophy, since it learns you how to "appreciate" simple pleasures of life, so it makes you happy, so then you have to be convinced of my philosophy (so read it below), and this very cold winter of Montreal learns you how to smartly adapt to this very cold winter of Montreal , so you have to be smart and be able to see how Montreal is so beautiful, so i invite you to look at the following video of a song about Montreal, so look in this video of this song how the Montreal winter is also beautiful: Robert Charlebois - Je reviendrai à Montréal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4NXUo8qipM So i am happy living in Montreal.. And i invite you to listen at the beautiful song above reading at the same time my following poems in french: https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/0AslKfJS9Nw And here is my thoughts of my political philosophy: More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and when you are smart you will easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data, also PathNET is much more powerful since also it is higher level abstraction in artificial intelligence.. Read about it here: https://mattturck.com/frontierai/ And read about PathNet here: https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46 More about artificial intelligence.. I think one of the most important part in artificial intelligence is reasoning with energy minimization, it is the one that i am working on right now, see the following video to understand more about it: Yann LeCun: Can Neural Networks Reason? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfwNEY826I&t=250s I think that since i have just understood much more artificial intelligence, i will soon show you my next Open source software project that implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO, and i will write an article that explain much more artificial intelligence and what is smartness and what is consciousness and self-awareness.. And in only one day i have just learned "much" more artificial intelligence, i have read the following article about Particle Swarm Optimization and i have understood it: Artificial Intelligence - Particle Swarm Optimization https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization But i have just noticed that the above implementation doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence. So here is how to guarantee the optimal convergence in PSO: Clerc and Kennedy in (Trelea 2003) propose a constriction coefficient parameter selection guidelines in order to guarantee the optimal convergence, here is how to do it with PSO: v(t+1) = k*[(v(t) + (c1 * r1 * (p(t) – x(t)) + (c2 * r2 * (g(t) – x(t))] x(t+1) = x(t) + v(t+1) constriction coefficient parameter is: k = 2/abs(2-phi-sqrt(phi^2-(4*phi))) k:=2/abs((2-4.1)-(0.640)) = 0.729 phi = c1 + c2 To guarantee the optimal convergence use: c1 = c2 = 2.05 phi = 4.1 => k equal to 0.729 w=0.7298 Population size = 60; Also i have noticed that GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and SA(Simulated annealing) and Hill Climbing are much less powerful since they perform only exploitation. In general, any metaheuristic should perform two main searching capabilities (Exploration and Exploitation). Population based algorithms ( or many solutions ) such as GA, PSO, ACO, or ABC, performs both Exploration and Exploitation, while Single-Based Algorithm such as SA(Simulated annealing), Hill Climbing, performs the exploitation only. In this case, more exploitation and less exploration increases the chances for trapping in local optima. Because the algorithm does not have the ability to search in another position far from the current best solution ( which is Exploration). Simulated annealing starts in one valley and typically ends in the lowest point of the same valley. Whereas swarms start in many different places of the mountain range and are searching for the lowest point in many valleys simultaneously. And in my next Open source software project i will implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO. The exploration and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) in artificial intelligence is by logical analogy like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration, so read my following thoughts of my political philosophy about it: More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism.. I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism, so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of the far-right political party in France: Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i think that this new model is better because it is more efficient , because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition. More philosophy about emotionality about life.. You can be emotional by looking at life, this is understandable, but you have to be smart, since you have to be able to see the beautifulness of life, and it is that life is like Swarm intelligence, so life is smart, so we have to be optimistic about it. I invite you to read the following article about Swarm intelligence: https://hbr.org/2001/05/swarm-intelligence-a-whole-new-way-to-think-about-business And read the following about about Swarm intelligence: How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/ More philosophy about the secret of life.. I think i am a wise man, and i think that life has like a secret, and it is that it needs darkness and lightness but this both darkness and lightness is happiness, since darkness of life also become an insight that helps us, and also darkness of life is as a level of suffering that allows us to appreciate simple pleasures of life or pleasures of life, and this mechanism of life that is a level of suffering that allows us to appreciate simple pleasures of life also allows us to be happy, so when you are a wise man you will notice that life is like a mechanism that is smart, since life is like Swarm intelligence that brings the best. So we have to be optimistic. More about the wisdom of my philosophy.. I think i am a wise man.. So if you say to people that they have to be responsable, do you think it can work ? I think that saying to people to be responsable is psychologically almost the same as saying to them to suffer, so is it a good philosophy? no, it is not a good philosophy, since you have to find the intellectual mechanisms that permit to avoid this problem or this bug, so this is why i think i am a wise man that is finding the mechanisms that "encourage" people to be responsable, so you have to be smart and read my following philosophy to notice how i am doing it, and notice how i am saying in my political philosophy the following: From where comes happiness and pleasures of life? It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give yourself peace by taking a rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from where comes the meaning of human existence. More philosophy about the wise man.. I think i am a wise man, but when you are a wise man you will know that a wise man is not like others, because he is smart and he also finds the intellectual "mechanisms" that for example efficiently fight "corruption" of the minds and that efficiently fight the problem of absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus and that efficiently fight nihilism, and finding those intellectual mechanisms is the first important thing in philosophy, this is what i am doing, and this is what i am doing in my thoughts of my political philosophy below: About more about my philosophy and about buddhism.. I think i am smart, so i will make you understand my philosophy correctly, so look at the following song of Michael Jackson: Michael Jackson - Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough (Official Video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yURRmWtbTbo You will quickly notice by looking at the above video and by knowing more about Michael Jackson, that he was a drug addict of pleasures of life, and you have to understand what it means, since i mean that he didn't know how to control correctly himself by being this drug addict of pleasures of life, so we call it in french: "L'emprise des plaisirs de la vie sur une personne qui le rendent mentalement défectueux", and my translation in english is: "The grip of the pleasures of life on a person that make him mentally defective", so my philosophy is not buddhism since you notice that it doesn't say that you have not to be rich, since in my philosophy you can be rich and you have to know how to be sophisticated, but the very important thing of my philosophy is that it also learns a person how to survive and be happy with simple pleasures of life, so that he can control himself correctly such as when he is rich. So look at the following american dream of Micheal Jackson and you will notice that Micheal Jackson has died of a Drug Overdose even if he has been very rich or he was rich, so i think he was a person that didn't know how to appreciate simple pleasures of life, so he was not a happy person even if he was very rich. Look at the following video to notice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R73DZkM9X6U So you have to read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand: More precision about more of my philosophy about order and happiness.. I am a white arab and i think i am a philosopher and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. Here is my new smart proverb: "Happiness also comes from the simple and happiness is near and you have to know how to attain it" This proverb of mine is really smart, and it logically means that with all other proportions kept(like constant), i think that happiness also comes from simple pleasures of life, this is why i think that you have to know how to play it smartly by being selective of those simple pleasures of life that make you happy, so as you are noticing that saying that happiness comes from being rich is not a correct philosophy, so you have to be wise and read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to know from where comes happiness: Here is another new proverb of mine that shows more what is wisdom.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am also a philosopher, and i can also invent proverbs, here is yet another new smart proverb of mine: "There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be confident with the appearances, since in science you have to |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jan 29 09:25AM -0800 Hello... More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and when you are smart you will easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data, also PathNET is much more powerful since also it is higher level abstraction in artificial intelligence.. Read about it here: https://mattturck.com/frontierai/ And read about PathNet here: https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46 More about artificial intelligence.. I think one of the most important part in artificial intelligence is reasoning with energy minimization, it is the one that i am working on right now, see the following video to understand more about it: Yann LeCun: Can Neural Networks Reason? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfwNEY826I&t=250s I think that since i have just understood much more artificial intelligence, i will soon show you my next Open source software project that implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO, and i will write an article that explain much more artificial intelligence and what is smartness and what is consciousness and self-awareness.. And in only one day i have just learned "much" more artificial intelligence, i have read the following article about Particle Swarm Optimization and i have understood it: Artificial Intelligence - Particle Swarm Optimization https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization But i have just noticed that the above implementation doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence. So here is how to guarantee the optimal convergence in PSO: Clerc and Kennedy in (Trelea 2003) propose a constriction coefficient parameter selection guidelines in order to guarantee the optimal convergence, here is how to do it with PSO: v (t+1) = k*[(v(t) + (c1 * r1 * (p(t) – x(t)) + (c2 * r2 * (g(t) – x(t))] x(t+1) = x(t) + v(t+1) constriction coefficient parameter is: k = 2/abs(2-phi-sqrt(phi^2-(4*phi))) k:=2/abs((2-4.1)-(0.640)) = 0.729 phi = c1 + c2 To guarantee the optimal convergence use: c1 = c2 = 2.05 phi = 4.1 => k equal to 0.729 w=0.7298 Population size = 60; Also i have noticed that GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the optimal convergence, and SA(Simulated annealing) and Hill Climbing are much less powerful since they perform only exploitation. In general, any metaheuristic should perform two main searching capabilities (Exploration and Exploitation). Population based algorithms ( or many solutions ) such as GA, PSO, ACO, or ABC, performs both Exploration and Exploitation, while Single-Based Algorithm such as SA(Simulated annealing), Hill Climbing, performs the exploitation only. In this case, more exploitation and less exploration increases the chances for trapping in local optima. Because the algorithm does not have the ability to search in another position far from the current best solution ( which is Exploration). Simulated annealing starts in one valley and typically ends in the lowest point of the same valley. Whereas swarms start in many different places of the mountain range and are searching for the lowest point in many valleys simultaneously. And in my next Open source software project i will implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO. The exploration and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) in artificial intelligence is by logical analogy like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration, so read my following thoughts of my political philosophy about it: More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism.. I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism, so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of the far-right political party in France: Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i think that this new model is better because it is more efficient , because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition. More philosophy about emotionality about life.. You can be emotional by looking at life, this is understandable, but you have to be smart, since you have to be able to see the beautifulness of life, and it is that life is like Swarm intelligence, so life is smart, so we have to be optimistic about it. I invite you to read the following article about Swarm intelligence: https://hbr.org/2001/05/swarm-intelligence-a-whole-new-way-to-think-about-business And read the following about about Swarm intelligence: How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/ More philosophy about the secret of life.. I think i am a wise man, and i think that life has like a secret, and it is that it needs darkness and lightness but this both darkness and lightness is happiness, since darkness of life also become an insight that helps us, and also darkness of life is as a level of suffering that allows us to appreciate simple pleasures of life or pleasures of life, and this mechanism of life that is a level of suffering that allows us to appreciate simple pleasures of life also allows us to be happy, so when you are a wise man you will notice that life is like a mechanism that is smart, since life is like Swarm intelligence that brings the best. So we have to be optimistic. More about the wisdom of my philosophy.. I think i am a wise man.. So if you say to people that they have to be responsable, do you think it can work ? I think that saying to people to be responsable is psychologically almost the same as saying to them to suffer, so is it a good philosophy? no, it is not a good philosophy, since you have to find the intellectual mechanisms that permit to avoid this problem or this bug, so this is why i think i am a wise man that is finding the mechanisms that "encourage" people to be responsable, so you have to be smart and read my following philosophy to notice how i am doing it, and notice how i am saying in my political philosophy the following: From where comes happiness and pleasures of life? It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give yourself peace by taking a rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from where comes the meaning of human existence. More philosophy about the wise man.. I think i am a wise man, but when you are a wise man you will know that a wise man is not like others, because he is smart and he also finds the intellectual "mechanisms" that for example efficiently fight "corruption" of the minds and that efficiently fight the problem of absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus and that efficiently fight nihilism, and finding those intellectual mechanisms is the first important thing in philosophy, this is what i am doing, and this is what i am doing in my thoughts of my political philosophy below: About more about my philosophy and about buddhism.. I think i am smart, so i will make you understand my philosophy correctly, so look at the following song of Michael Jackson: Michael Jackson - Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough (Official Video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yURRmWtbTbo You will quickly notice by looking at the above video and by knowing more about Michael Jackson, that he was a drug addict of pleasures of life, and you have to understand what it means, since i mean that he didn't know how to control correctly himself by being this drug addict of pleasures of life, so we call it in french: "L'emprise des plaisirs de la vie sur une personne qui le rendent mentalement défectueux", and my translation in english is: "The grip of the pleasures of life on a person that make him mentally defective", so my philosophy is not buddhism since you notice that it doesn't say that you have not to be rich, since in my philosophy you can be rich and you have to know how to be sophisticated, but the very important thing of my philosophy is that it also learns a person how to survive and be happy with simple pleasures of life, so that he can control himself correctly such as when he is rich. So look at the following american dream of Micheal Jackson and you will notice that Micheal Jackson has died of a Drug Overdose even if he has been very rich or he was rich, so i think he was a person that didn't know how to appreciate simple pleasures of life, so he was not a happy person even if he was very rich. Look at the following video to notice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R73DZkM9X6U So you have to read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand: More precision about more of my philosophy about order and happiness.. I am a white arab and i think i am a philosopher and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. Here is my new smart proverb: "Happiness also comes from the simple and happiness is near and you have to know how to attain it" This proverb of mine is really smart, and it logically means that with all other proportions kept(like constant), i think that happiness also comes from simple pleasures of life, this is why i think that you have to know how to play it smartly by being selective of those simple pleasures of life that make you happy, so as you are noticing that saying that happiness comes from being rich is not a correct philosophy, so you have to be wise and read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to know from where comes happiness: Here is another new proverb of mine that shows more what is wisdom.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am also a philosopher, and i can also invent proverbs, here is yet another new smart proverb of mine: "There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a fool by lack of wisdom " And here is another proverb of mine: "Wich one has to precede, being able to reason correctly or to rush in like a fool without being able to reason correctly? when you are able to answer correctly this question, you will understand a very important principle that makes you much more wise." Here is another new proverb of mine.. "A wise man is by "logical" analogy like the person that knows how to prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one that knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized global world from the people." And here is my other new proverb: Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my explanation of my new proverb. Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below: My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or encourages us |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Jan 29 08:46AM -0800 Hello, More philosophy about emotionality about life.. You can be emotional by looking at life, this is understandable, but you have to be smart, since you have to be able to see the beautifulness of life, and it is that life is like Swarm intelligence, so life is smart, so we have to be optimistic about it. I invite you to read the following article about Swarm intelligence: https://hbr.org/2001/05/swarm-intelligence-a-whole-new-way-to-think-about-business More philosophy about the secret of life.. I think i am a wise man, and i think that life has like a secret, and its secret is that it needs darkness and lightness but this both darkness and lightness is happiness, since darkness of life also become an insight that helps us, and also darkness of life is as a level of suffering that allows us to appreciate simple pleasures of life or pleasures of life, and this mechanism of life that is a level of suffering that allows us to appreciate simple pleasures of life also allows us to be happy, so when you are a wise man you will notice that life is like a mechanism that is smart, since life is like Swarm intelligence that brings the best. So we have to be optimistic. More about the wisdom of my philosophy.. I think i am a wise man.. So if you say to people that they have to be responsable, do you think it can work ? I think that saying to people to be responsable is psychologically almost the same as saying to them to suffer, so is it a good philosophy? no, it is not a good philosophy, since you have to find the intellectual mechanisms that permit to avoid this problem or this bug, so this is why i think i am a wise man that is finding the mechanisms that "encourage" people to be responsable, so you have to be smart and read my following philosophy to notice how i am doing it, and notice how i am saying in my political philosophy the following: From where comes happiness and pleasures of life? It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give yourself peace by taking a rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from where comes the meaning of human existence. More philosophy about the wise man.. I think i am a wise man, but when you are a wise man you will know that a wise man is not like others, because he is smart and he also finds the intellectual "mechanisms" that for example efficiently fight "corruption" of the minds and that efficiently fight the problem of absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus and that efficiently fight nihilism, and finding those intellectual mechanisms is the first important thing in philosophy, this is what i am doing, and this is what i am doing in my thoughts of my political philosophy below: About more about my philosophy and about buddhism.. I think i am smart, so i will make you understand my philosophy correctly, so look at the following song of Michael Jackson: Michael Jackson - Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough (Official Video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yURRmWtbTbo You will quickly notice by looking at the above video and by knowing more about Michael Jackson, that he was a drug addict of pleasures of life, and you have to understand what it means, since i mean that he didn't know how to control correctly himself by being this drug addict of pleasures of life, so we call it in french: "L'emprise des plaisirs de la vie sur une personne qui le rendent mentalement défectueux", and my translation in english is: "The grip of the pleasures of life on a person that make him mentally defective", so my philosophy is not buddhism since you notice that it doesn't say that you have not to be rich, since in my philosophy you can be rich and you have to know how to be sophisticated, but the very important thing of my philosophy is that it also learns a person how to survive and be happy with simple pleasures of life, so that he can control himself correctly such as when he is rich. So look at the following american dream of Micheal Jackson and you will notice that Micheal Jackson has died of a Drug Overdose even if he has been very rich or he was rich, so i think he was a person that didn't know how to appreciate simple pleasures of life, so he was not a happy person even if he was very rich. Look at the following video to notice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R73DZkM9X6U So you have to read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand: More precision about more of my philosophy about order and happiness.. I am a white arab and i think i am a philosopher and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. Here is my new smart proverb: "Happiness also comes from the simple and happiness is near and you have to know how to attain it" This proverb of mine is really smart, and it logically means that with all other proportions kept(like constant), i think that happiness also comes from simple pleasures of life, this is why i think that you have to know how to play it smartly by being selective of those simple pleasures of life that make you happy, so as you are noticing that saying that happiness comes from being rich is not a correct philosophy, so you have to be wise and read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to know from where comes happiness: Here is another new proverb of mine that shows more what is wisdom.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am also a philosopher, and i can also invent proverbs, here is yet another new smart proverb of mine: "There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a fool by lack of wisdom " And here is another proverb of mine: "Wich one has to precede, being able to reason correctly or to rush in like a fool without being able to reason correctly? when you are able to answer correctly this question, you will understand a very important principle that makes you much more wise." Here is another new proverb of mine.. "A wise man is by "logical" analogy like the person that knows how to prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one that knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized global world from the people." And here is my other new proverb: Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my explanation of my new proverb. Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below: My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or encourages us to be or allows us to become perfect or greatly perfect. Read about it here on my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So here is my new proverb: "Life is like the pretty perfume that calls us to be a pretty tomorrow!" So notice carefully my smart play on words in my new proverb, i think it's smart, and you have to know that the future perfection depends on the present perfection, so when today we are responsibility to be the pretty perfection so that to build the pretty tomorrow, then the pretty perfection of today is part of the pretty tomorrow, and the "pretty perfume" in my new proverb is also the today pretty perfection, but you have to understand the symbolic which allows us to say that being this part of the pretty tomorrow is also like being the pretty tomorrow. It is what makes it a smart proverb. More of my philosophy about what is the Nature of Personal Identity.. I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I invite you to look at the following short video: Raymond Kurzweil - What is the Nature of Personal Identity? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pb3zsuHwqvY&t=193s I think that Raymond Kurzweil in the above video is not answering correctly. So i think that it is a philosophical question of: What is the Nature of Personal Identity? So i think i am smart and i will answer it like the following: I think that you have to understand my philosophy about morality, here it is: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4 So as you are noticing that in my philosophy about morality i am proving that morality is perfection at best , and the "at best" is here in the definition of morality to make it a correct abstraction, and note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting" Read here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection So as you are noticing since morality is also perfection, so our identity or personal identity is also this perfection, since we can say that we are a civilization and this civilization is a dynamic process and it is the act or process of perfecting at best, so then you have to know how to be correct science and correct technology that brings perfection. And to be able to know more about my philosophy about existence, I have just created a webpage on my website here about my philosophy about human existence, you can read it carefully here: https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence And here is the rest of my thoughts of my philosophy: More of my philosophy about how to prove the fuzziness of smartness.. As you have just noticed i have just said the following about what is a genius and what is smartness: --- I have just read the following very interesting article from Livescience, i invite you to read it carefully: Genius: Can anybody be one? https://www.livescience.com/55028-what-makes-a-genius.html So i am a white arab, and i think i am a genius, and i will explain what is a genius and what is smartness: First you have to make a difference between IQ tests and smartness, but i think that the standard IQ tests are not testing correctly IQ, since i think there is a "probabilistic" process in the way we solve IQ tests, i mean that you can be able to see clearly the pattern with your fluid intelligence or you can be able to see the pattern in a fuzzy way or probabilistic way with your fluid intelligence and still be able to recognize it or not be able to recognize it, that means that even if you have an IQ of 160 you can still not see a complex pattern even if an IQ of 110 can see the same complex pattern in a fuzzy way or probabilistic way and be able to recognize it, so i think it is like deep learning networks. -- But i have to like prove this the fuzziness of smartness: To be able to prove it, i will start to prove it like the following: Notice that being artistic is also smartness, because i think that being artistic is being able to recognize with your brain a pattern(of music and such), and after that from the pattern recognized being able to for example play the recognized pattern with a guitar, but notice again that recognizing the pattern is also a smartness that is fuzzy, since you notice that the patterns of music that are recognized by the brain of an artist can become fuzziness since the music that is discovered can be less perfect in a fuzzy way than other music that is discovered, so this proves that being artistic is also like deep learning networks in action in the brain of the artist, so being artistic is being smartness, but this smartness is smartness of being artistic. So then i think that the other patterns in for example logical reasoning etc. of what we call smartness are also fuzzy. And i think that what we call mathematical intuition is also being able to recognize with fluid intelligence a full pattern from a fuzzy pattern, so mathematical intuition is smartness that is also fuzzy. Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand: More of my philosophy about what is it to be a genius.. I have just read the following very interesting article from Livescience, i invite you to read it carefully: Genius: Can anybody be one? https://www.livescience.com/55028-what-makes-a-genius.html So i am a white arab, and i think i am a genius, and i will explain what is a genius and what is smartness: First you have to make a difference between IQ tests and smartness, but i think that the standard IQ tests are not testing correctly IQ, since i think there is a "probabilistic" process in the way we solve IQ tests, i mean that you can be able to see clearly the pattern with your fluid intelligence or you can be able to see the pattern in a fuzzy way or probabilistic way with your fluid intelligence and still be able to recognize it or not be able to recognize it, that means that even if you have an IQ of 160 you can still not see a complex pattern even if an IQ of 110 can see the same complex pattern in a fuzzy way or probabilistic way and be able to recognize it, so i think it is like deep learning networks. About more of my philosophy about smartness.. You will think that smartness is much more genetical, but this is a big mistake, since i think i am smart and i will explain: If you want to climb a big mountain, there is two ways: You can climb the big mountain or you can make the big mountain small in height so that to climb it, so when you are smart you will take a look at the constraints that make smartness much less expressive, and those constraints that make smartness much less expressive is like making the mountain small in height so that to climb it. Read more my following thoughts to understand: More philosophy about smartness and abstraction and complexity.. So i will start by asking a question: Is the way of learning by abstraction an efficient way ? So when you are smart you will quickly notice that we have to take into account the "context" of the way of learning by abstraction, and when you are smart you will notice that the way of learning by abstraction is also to reduce complexity, but when you take into account the context you will notice that learning by abstraction is a also a "specialization" and it is also an efficient way of learning when we measure it inside the "context" of abstraction that is the reality, so then we have not to be pessimistic about learning by the efficient way of abstraction since, first, it reduces the complexity and, second, even if we are not understanding the complexity behind the abstraction, learning by abstraction is |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment