- More of my philosophy about cancer and about a breakthrough anti-aging drug.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about the network topology of Intel Xeon and AMD Epyc and more of my thoughts.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about the pragmatic meaning of human life and more of my thoughts.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about silicon chip fabrication and technology and more of my thoughts.. - 1 Update
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 09 02:54PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about cancer and about a breakthrough anti-aging drug.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think the following new treatment will allow to beat cancer, so i invite you to read about it carefully in the following article: Scientists attempt to beat cancer by suffocating cells within four hours https://interestingengineering.com/health/new-treatment-suffocating-cancer-cells Elixir of life? A breakthrough anti-aging drug may be just around the corner Read more here: https://interestingengineering.com/health/rapamycin-anti-aging-drug-healthy-younger Other than that , i think you can live to 100 years if you take Metformin, and here is the logical proof of it: With reference to observed survival in diabetic patients initiated with metformin monotherapy [survival time ratio (STR) = 1.0], adjusted median survival time was 15% lower (STR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.90) in matched individuals without diabetes and 38% lower (0.62, 0.58-0.66) in diabetic patients treated with sulphonylurea monotherapy. Read more here on the following study so that to notice it: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25041462/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 09 01:05PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about the network topology of Intel Xeon and AMD Epyc and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, i have just looked at the network topology of AMD Epyc CPU, here it is: https://www.anandtech.com/show/11551/amds-future-in-servers-new-7000-series-cpus-launched-and-epyc-analysis/2 And i am carefully noticing in the above article that the network topology between the different CCX on the same die and between cores on the same CCX are connected with Infinity Fabric in a much sophisticated manner than a simple bus topology and i think it makes the AMD Eypc CPU good at "scalability" as is Intel Xeon, and i think that such CPUs are also efficiently minimizing the number of hops between sockets etc., it is why i think the number hops don't go higher than 2 and the latency of the two hops is not so problematic, so i think that it is a good news, since i think that AMD Epyc and Intel Xeon and the like are not using the following methodology in the following paper using filters so that to reduce bus traffic: I have just read the following interesting paper about Scaling SMP Machines Through Hierarchical Snooping, i invite you to read it: https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~kola/projectreports/cs757.pdf More of my philosophy about the network topology in multicores CPUs.. I invite you to look at the following video: Ring or Mesh, or other? AMD's Future on CPU Connectivity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8teWvMXK99I&t=904s And i invite you to read the following article: Does an AMD Chiplet Have a Core Count Limit? Read more here: https://www.anandtech.com/show/16930/does-an-amd-chiplet-have-a-core-count-limit I think i am smart and i say that the above video and the above article are not so smart, so i will talk about a very important thing, and it is the following, read the following: Performance Scalability of a Multi-core Web Server https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221046211_Performance_scalability_of_a_multi-core_web_server So notice carefully that it is saying the following: "..we determined that performance scaling was limited by the capacity of the address bus, which became saturated on all eight cores. If this key obstacle is addressed, commercial web server and systems software are well-positioned to scale to a large number of cores." So as you notice they were using an Intel Xeon of 8 cores, and the application was scalable to 8x but the hardware was not scalable to 8x, since it was scalable only to 4.8x, and this was caused by the bus saturation, since the Address bus saturation causes poor scaling, and the Address Bus carries requests and responses for data, called snoops, and more caches mean more sources and more destinations for snoops that is causing the poor scaling, so as you notice that a network topology of a Ring bus or a bus was not sufficient so that to scale to 8x on an Intel Xeon with 8 cores, so i think that the new architectures like Epyc CPU and Threadripper CPU can use a faster bus or/and a different network topology that permits to both ensure a full scalability locally in the same node and globally between the nodes, so then we can notice that a sophisticated mesh network topology not only permits to reduce the number of hops inside the CPU for good latency, but it is also good for reliability by using its sophisticated redundancy and it is faster than previous topologies like the ring bus or the bus since for example the search on address bus becomes parallelized, and it looks like the internet network that uses mesh topology using routers, so it parallelizes, and i also think that using a more sophisticated topology like a mesh network topology is related to queuing theory since we can notice that in operational research the mathematics says that we can make the queue like M/M/1 more efficient by making the server more powerful, but we can notice that the knee of a M/M/1 queue is around 50% , so we can notice that by using a mesh topology like internet or inside a CPU, you can by parallelizing more you can in operational research both enhance the knee of the queue and the speed of executing the transactions and it is like using many servers in queuing theory and it permits to scale better inside a CPU or in internet. More of my philosophy about silicon chip fabrication and technology and more of my thoughts.. The atoms used in silicon chip fabrication are around 0.2nm, so i think that we can make a transistor of one atom , you can read about it here: Scientists create new recipe for single-atom transistors https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/05/200511092920.htm So i think this gives an exponential growth of scalability with EUV(Extreme ultraviolet lithography) or such technology to around 2^5, and after that i think we can go to 3D or to the superconductor computer chips, read about them in my below thoughts, or use the following inventions, read about them carefully in my following writing and thoughts: More of my philosophy about latency and contention and concurrency and parallelism and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart and i have just posted, read it below, about the new two inventions that will make logic gates thousands of times faster or a million times faster than those in existing computers, and i think that there is still a problem with those new inventions, and it is about the latency and concurrency, since you need concurrency and you need preemptive or non-preemptive scheduling of the coroutines , so since the HBM is 106.7 ns in latency and the DDR4 is 73.3 ns in latency and the AMD 3D V-Cache has also almost the same cost in latency, so as you notice that this kind of latency is still costly , also there is a latency that is the Time slice that takes a coroutine to execute and it is costly in latency, since this kind of latency and Time slice is a waiting time that looks like the time wasted in a contention in parallelism, so by logical analogy this kind of latency and Time slice create like a contention like in parallelism that reduces scalability, so i think it is why those new inventions have this kind of limit or constraints in a "concurrency" envirenment. And i invite you to read my following smart thoughts about preemptive and non-preemptive timesharing: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/JuC4jar661w More of my philosophy about Fastest-ever logic gates and more of my thoughts.. "Logic gates are the fundamental building blocks of computers, and researchers at the University of Rochester have now developed the fastest ones ever created. By zapping graphene and gold with laser pulses, the new logic gates are a million times faster than those in existing computers, demonstrating the viability of "lightwave electronics.". If these kinds of lightwave electronic devices ever do make it to market, they could be millions of times faster than today's computers. Currently we measure processing speeds in Gigahertz (GHz), but these new logic gates function on the scale of Petahertz (PHz). Previous studies have set that as the absolute quantum limit of how fast light-based computer systems could possibly get." Read more here: https://newatlas.com/electronics/fastest-ever-logic-gates-computers-million-times-faster-petahertz/ Read my following news: And with the following new discovery computers and phones could run thousands of times faster.. Prof Alan Dalton in the School of Mathematical and Physics Sciences at the University of Sussex, said: "We're mechanically creating kinks in a layer of graphene. It's a bit like nano-origami. "Using these nanomaterials will make our computer chips smaller and faster. It is absolutely critical that this happens as computer manufacturers are now at the limit of what they can do with traditional semiconducting technology. Ultimately, this will make our computers and phones thousands of times faster in the future. "This kind of technology -- "straintronics" using nanomaterials as opposed to electronics -- allows space for more chips inside any device. Everything we want to do with computers -- to speed them up -- can be done by crinkling graphene like this." Dr Manoj Tripathi, Research Fellow in Nano-structured Materials at the University of Sussex and lead author on the paper, said: "Instead of having to add foreign materials into a device, we've shown we can create structures from graphene and other 2D materials simply by adding deliberate kinks into the structure. By making this sort of corrugation we can create a smart electronic component, like a transistor, or a logic gate." The development is a greener, more sustainable technology. Because no additional materials need to be added, and because this process works at room temperature rather than high temperature, it uses less energy to create. Read more here: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/02/210216100141.htm But I think that mass production of graphene still hasn't quite begun, so i think the inventions above of the Fastest-ever logic gates that uses graphene and of the one with nanomaterials that uses graphene will not be commercialized fully until perhaps around year 2035 or 2040 or so, so read the following so that to understand why: "Because large-scale mass production of graphene still hasn't quite begun , the market is a bit limited. However, that leaves a lot of room open for investors to get in before it reaches commercialization. The market was worth $78.7 million in 2019 and, according to Grand View Research, is expected to rise drastically to $1.08 billion by 2027. North America currently has the bulk of market share, but the Asia-Pacific area is expected to have the quickest growth in adoption of graphene uses in coming years. North America and Europe are also expected to have above-market average growth. The biggest driver of all this growth is expected to be the push for cleaner, more efficient energy sources and the global reduction of emissions in the air." Read more here: https://www.energyandcapital.com/report/the-worlds-next-rare-earth-metal/1600 More of my philosophy about superconductor computer chips and more of my thoughts.. "Scientists from the University of Virginia School of Medicine and collaborators used the building blocks of life to potentially revolutionize electronics. Edward H. Egelman, Ph.D. and his colleagues say their new DNA-enabled method could have a wide range of research applications in physics and materials science. Crucially, it could lead to the creation of Little's room-temperature superconductor, which could help revolutionize electronics. Their work, combined with other recent breakthroughs in superconductors, could unlock the great potential of quantum computing — which would, in turn, vastly improve countless scientific fields with its hyper-fast calculations." Read more here: https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/engineering-breakthrough-dna-quantum-computing So i think that superconductor computer chips will be possible in the future, and computer chips with superconducting circuits — circuits with zero electrical resistance — would be 50 to 100 times as energy-efficient as today's chips, an attractive trait given the increasing power consumption of the massive data centers that power the Internet's most popular sites. And superconducting chips also promise greater processing power: Superconducting circuits have been clocked at a Terahertz. More of my philosophy about energy efficiency of quantum computers and about IBM's Compute-in-memory and more of my thoughts.. I think i am smart, and i will say that IBM have invented the following Compute-in-memory specialized hardware that works in both analogue and digital so that to lower much more energy consumption, read about it here: IBM: Compute-in-memory beats GPUs by 10x, sometimes https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/research-news/ibm-compute-memory-beats-gpus-10x-sometimes-2021-11/ But i think that the much better solution than the above Compute-in-memory specialized hardware of IBM is to use the powerful quantum computers, and i invite you so that to read the following article about it: Quantum computers vastly outperform supercomputers when it comes to energy efficiency https://physicsworld.com/a/quantum-computers-vastly-outperform-supercomputers-when-it-comes-to-energy-efficiency/ Also i have just looked at the following article about the benchmark of Intel Xeon Scalable Processor vs. Nvidia V100 GPU, here it is: https://www.xcelerit.com/computing-benchmarks/insights/benchmarks-intel-xeon-scalable-processor-vs-nvidia-v100-gpu/ So i think that the main problem of Intel Xeons in the above benchmark is the memory bandwidth, so i think that the number of GFLOPs of Intel Xeons in the above benchmark is a result of multiplying the frequency of the CPU by the number of cores and by 2x8FMA, i mean fused multiply–add (FMA) instructions for floating-point scalar and SIMD operations, and it is giving a result of 2,240 GFLOPs, so then if you want to have a powerful computer that also have a good memory bandwidth, i advice you to use a new two socket for new Intel Xeon processors that support a memory bandwidth of like 5.2 GT/s for DDR5 x 8 bytes per channel x 12 channels for one socket, and that equals 499.2 GB per second or 998.4 GB per second for two sockets, and this will equal the memory bandwidth of the Nvidia V100 PCIe (Volta) in the above benchmark , and this will solve the memory bandwidth problem, and of course the two socket motherboard for a two new 64 cores Intel Xeon 3.4 Ghz will give you around 6963 GFLOPs as the Nvidia V100 PCIe (Volta). And i invite you so that to read my following thoughts about AVX-512 of AMD Zen 4, since i have just brought a little more precision to it: More of my philosophy about AVX-512 of AMD Zen 4 architecture and more of my thoughts.. I think AVX-512 of AMD Zen 4 architecture will not be a true, 512-bit wide SIMD as we find in Intel architecture, but Zen 4 will be executing these AVX-512 instructions over two cycles, so i think it will not require to lower the frequency of the cores when using AVX-512, as is doing it Intel, and i think that AMD is doing it this way for also "compatibility" with the Intel AVX-512, and you can read the following article so that to notice it: https://www.anandtech.com/show/17552/amd-details-ryzen-7000-launch-up-ryzen-7950x-coming-sept-27 More of my philosophy about RISC-V and about open source and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it: RISC-V Chips Revolution is coming https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irH5eKzezsE But I don't think RISC-V is a good thing, since read the following about the open source problems: "RISC-V is open source, and open-source hardware centers on a design everybody is free to use and modify as they see fit. For its part, ARM claims that it has much more money to fund R&D and develop technology for its customers, whereas RISC-V International does not and merely provides an ISA. ARM also raised concerns that usage of RISC-V could result in "fragmentation," which is basically a lack of standards throughout an industry that creates an obstacle for compatibility in both hardware and software. Since ARM provides standardized cores, the risk of fragmentation is |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 09 08:25AM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about the pragmatic meaning of human life and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that you can, like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, logically infer that human existence is absurd, but i don't think it is the good way of measuring, since i think that there is also the "pragmatic" way of measuring, since i think that noticing that humans die or a part of humans suffer or the like is not the thing that must make us think that human existence is absurd, since the "pragmatic" way of measuring the meaning of human life is to notice that we have really progressed in the today human life compared to the old human life and we are really progressing in an exponential way, and i think that it is what gives the meaning of human life, so i think what remains is that we have to minimize at best or avoid wars and we have to be the right safety in managing the exponential progress of our humanity, and speaking about the exponential progress of our humanity, here is what i have said about it: More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts.. So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question of: From where comes the meaning of human life ? I think i am highly smart, and i say that you can by being relativism in philosophy says that human life has no meaning, so relativism in philosophy in its essence has a problem, but i think that the smart way of constructing a meaning of human life, is also to be the pragmatic way by giving weights of importance to things, it is like "prioritizing" by giving weights of importance so that to be successful, i mean look at human life, it is much better than the old human life, so this way of looking at it permits to give a weight of importance , and also the other way is also to say that humanity is in fact progressing in an exponential way, so we are progressing so rapidly, and this way also of looking at it gives a great weight of importance and those two ways of looking at human life gives optimism, so i think it is the way to construct a meaning of human life, and this way of constructing a meaning of human life looks like my answer below about the can we be enlightned or not, so as you are noticing that the pragmatic way of my answer below proceeds by giving weights of importance so that also enforce the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world. And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity: Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ And look in the following interesting article about how AI will create millions more Jobs than it Will destroy: https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/ So i think we have to be optimistic about this exponential progress of our humanity. More of my philosophy about enlightenment and more of my thoughts.. So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will invite you to look at the following video of the indian philosophy that is making a big mistake: The Bizarre Life Of An Enlightened Person https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzmGkRF2ggU So i am discovering in the above video patterns with my fluid intelligence that say to me that the above video of the indian philosophy is making a big mistake, since the above video of the indian philosophy is saying that you can not be enlightned, but it is "relativism" in philosophy that is not acceptable as morality, since also with this relativism we can also say that the smart humans among us are not smart humans, and this relativism brings an advantage of the being humbleness , but it also brings a disadvantage of being arrogance, so it is by logical analogy like the we can not say that you have to know how to use relativism like you have to know how to use a knife, since the normal distribution says that a not negligible percentage of humans are genetically violent, it is why i think that so that to be the right safety, we have to be the pragmatic way that also enforces the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world, so we have to for example say that the "highly smart" humans among us are the most important humans, since also they are like the most important engine that we have, since we can easily notice that without the highly smart humans, humanity becomes inferior like inferior animals, and it is why i have just said the following: More of my philosophy about how to create in new type of man and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i think that it is possible to create a kind of new sophisticated type of human or man, so i think i have just explained in my below thoughts of my philosophy how to be hope and how to be a positive energy, but i think one of the most important thing is to ask a the following philosophical question: What is the mechanisms that make a human be efficient at adaptation and perfection ? So i think that i have also just talked in my below thoughts of my philosophy about the first mechanism that is that when you become more and more perfect, you begin to notice that human life becomes more and more easy for you, since for example when you become more and more educated , you become more and more smart, so then for example the "reusability" of this smartness makes human life more easy for you, but not only that, but the second mechanism is that we have to organize knowledge and information such as on internet in such way that it becomes easy to find the efficient and high quality knowledge and information, so then you have to be "selective" in such way of your knowledge and information so that to be efficient. And of course i have also just said that this becoming more and more smart and more and more selective can hurt and can hurt business, and here is what i have just said about it: More of my philosophy about the radical form of governance and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and as you have just noticed i have just talked about the Volksgemeinschaft and about neo-Nazism, read it below, and as you have noticed i have just talked about the radical form of governance where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), so this way of governance has not worked, but today the way of governance has changed and i think that it is proceeding by the way of introducing appropriate, rational reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments and by monitoring with statistics, other than that there is also another radical form of governance that says that we have to be the radical form of class struggle as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but i think that this way of doing has not worked since this radical way of class struggle renders people too much hateful(filled with hatred), since in this radical form of Class Struggle, the lower classes in the society hate the upper classes and the upper classes hate the lower classes, so this kind of radical form of Class Struggle doesn't work and it is not good for business, since i say that in business we have even to be disciplined at buying a product or service even if we don't love them, since for example i can say that when you become more and more educated, so then you become more and more smart, so then you become more and more "selective" of products and of services and of humans and this can hurt and this can hurt business, so then i think that the solution of this problem is for example to become disciplined at buying a product or service even if you don't love them, and of course you are noticing that we have to make people aware of it by educating them correctly. And here is what i say more about Class struggle: And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism, so i will first ask a philosophical question of: Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ? I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism, since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions. More of my philosophy about thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism and about competition and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism of marxism and communism, is by logical analogy like the process of competition between ideas or between people that brings quality, so you can have a "synthesis" of private property and socialism understood as thesis and antithesis, and you can have collision of the bourgeoisie and the working class as competing thesis and antithesis that can bring a synthesis as quality, so i think that marxism and communism say that the bourgeoisie of the capitalistic system is not capable of treating correctly the working class, and i think it is from where comes marxism, but i think that this way of thinking is too extremist in our today world , since i have just for example said that workers living standards depend on wage levels, not wage ratios, eventhough when measuring wage dispersion, economists frequently look at the 90/50 ratio, so i think that we have not to be pessimistic about the living standards that has brought capitalism, and you can read all my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice it: More of my philosophy about the Volksgemeinschaft and about neo-Nazism and more of my thoughts.. And read the following article so that you understand more: Germany seeks ban on neo-Nazis https://wc.arizona.edu/papers/94/58/01_96_m.html And I invite you to read the following article from a white supremacist and neo-nazi website called national vanguard: https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/04/cosmotheism-in-savitri-devi-2/ And notice that it is saying the following about national socialism of the white supremacism and neo-nazism: "[National Socialism] aimed at stemming the physical and moral decay of modern, technically "advanced" humanity by forcing it — by forcing its racial élite, at least — to live in accordance with the ultimate purpose of Nature, which is not to make individuals "happy," nor even to make, nations "happy," but to evolve supermankind — living godhead — out of the existing master races, first of all, out of the pure Aryan. Happiness is a bourgeois conception, definitely. It is not our concern. We want animals to be happy — and inferior men, also, to the extent their happiness does not disturb the New Order. We believe higher mankind has better things to do. The Aryan world, remoulded by us after our final triumph, will no longer think in terms of happiness like the decadent world of today. It will think in terms of duty — like the early Vedic world, the early Christian world, the early Islamic world; like the world at the time of any great new beginning." But i think i am smart and i say that there is two weaknesses in the above thoughts of neo-nazism, first weakness is that neo-nazism wants to be dictatorship so that to use the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but this way of doing has not worked, and the second weakness is that the "duty" in the above thoughts of neo-nazism is idealized, but since the duty has to be dictated by the dictatorship of neo-nazism, so since it is not the democratic way, then the duty that is dictated by neo-nazism can not work correctly and it can become a big problem since it comes from the dictatorship of neo-nazism. I think i am smart, and i have just spoken yesterday about neo-Nazism and i have just said that what also they want to do is to be a dictatorship so that to use the radical form that has not worked, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), and here is more logical proof about the way of Social Engineering of Nazism and how the Nazism or neo-Nazism define who belongs to the National Socialist 'community' and who does not, read the following: |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 09 07:03AM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about silicon chip fabrication and technology and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. The atoms used in silicon chip fabrication are around 0.2nm, so i think that we can make a transistor of one atom , you can read about it here: Scientists create new recipe for single-atom transistors https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/05/200511092920.htm So i think this gives an exponential growth of scalability with EUV(Extreme ultraviolet lithography) or such technology to around 2^5, and after that i think we can go to 3D or to the superconductor computer chips, read about them in my below thoughts, or use the following inventions, read about them carefully in my following writing and thoughts: More of my philosophy about latency and contention and concurrency and parallelism and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart and i have just posted, read it below, about the new two inventions that will make logic gates thousands of times faster or a million times faster than those in existing computers, and i think that there is still a problem with those new inventions, and it is about the latency and concurrency, since you need concurrency and you need preemptive or non-preemptive scheduling of the coroutines , so since the HBM is 106.7 ns in latency and the DDR4 is 73.3 ns in latency and the AMD 3D V-Cache has also almost the same cost in latency, so as you notice that this kind of latency is still costly , also there is a latency that is the Time slice that takes a coroutine to execute and it is costly in latency, since this kind of latency and Time slice is a waiting time that looks like the time wasted in a contention in parallelism, so by logical analogy this kind of latency and Time slice create like a contention like in parallelism that reduces scalability, so i think it is why those new inventions have this kind of limit or constraints in a "concurrency" envirenment. And i invite you to read my following smart thoughts about preemptive and non-preemptive timesharing: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/JuC4jar661w More of my philosophy about Fastest-ever logic gates and more of my thoughts.. "Logic gates are the fundamental building blocks of computers, and researchers at the University of Rochester have now developed the fastest ones ever created. By zapping graphene and gold with laser pulses, the new logic gates are a million times faster than those in existing computers, demonstrating the viability of "lightwave electronics.". If these kinds of lightwave electronic devices ever do make it to market, they could be millions of times faster than today's computers. Currently we measure processing speeds in Gigahertz (GHz), but these new logic gates function on the scale of Petahertz (PHz). Previous studies have set that as the absolute quantum limit of how fast light-based computer systems could possibly get." Read more here: https://newatlas.com/electronics/fastest-ever-logic-gates-computers-million-times-faster-petahertz/ Read my following news: And with the following new discovery computers and phones could run thousands of times faster.. Prof Alan Dalton in the School of Mathematical and Physics Sciences at the University of Sussex, said: "We're mechanically creating kinks in a layer of graphene. It's a bit like nano-origami. "Using these nanomaterials will make our computer chips smaller and faster. It is absolutely critical that this happens as computer manufacturers are now at the limit of what they can do with traditional semiconducting technology. Ultimately, this will make our computers and phones thousands of times faster in the future. "This kind of technology -- "straintronics" using nanomaterials as opposed to electronics -- allows space for more chips inside any device. Everything we want to do with computers -- to speed them up -- can be done by crinkling graphene like this." Dr Manoj Tripathi, Research Fellow in Nano-structured Materials at the University of Sussex and lead author on the paper, said: "Instead of having to add foreign materials into a device, we've shown we can create structures from graphene and other 2D materials simply by adding deliberate kinks into the structure. By making this sort of corrugation we can create a smart electronic component, like a transistor, or a logic gate." The development is a greener, more sustainable technology. Because no additional materials need to be added, and because this process works at room temperature rather than high temperature, it uses less energy to create. Read more here: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/02/210216100141.htm But I think that mass production of graphene still hasn't quite begun, so i think the inventions above of the Fastest-ever logic gates that uses graphene and of the one with nanomaterials that uses graphene will not be commercialized fully until perhaps around year 2035 or 2040 or so, so read the following so that to understand why: "Because large-scale mass production of graphene still hasn't quite begun , the market is a bit limited. However, that leaves a lot of room open for investors to get in before it reaches commercialization. The market was worth $78.7 million in 2019 and, according to Grand View Research, is expected to rise drastically to $1.08 billion by 2027. North America currently has the bulk of market share, but the Asia-Pacific area is expected to have the quickest growth in adoption of graphene uses in coming years. North America and Europe are also expected to have above-market average growth. The biggest driver of all this growth is expected to be the push for cleaner, more efficient energy sources and the global reduction of emissions in the air." Read more here: https://www.energyandcapital.com/report/the-worlds-next-rare-earth-metal/1600 More of my philosophy about superconductor computer chips and more of my thoughts.. "Scientists from the University of Virginia School of Medicine and collaborators used the building blocks of life to potentially revolutionize electronics. Edward H. Egelman, Ph.D. and his colleagues say their new DNA-enabled method could have a wide range of research applications in physics and materials science. Crucially, it could lead to the creation of Little's room-temperature superconductor, which could help revolutionize electronics. Their work, combined with other recent breakthroughs in superconductors, could unlock the great potential of quantum computing — which would, in turn, vastly improve countless scientific fields with its hyper-fast calculations." Read more here: https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/engineering-breakthrough-dna-quantum-computing So i think that superconductor computer chips will be possible in the future, and computer chips with superconducting circuits — circuits with zero electrical resistance — would be 50 to 100 times as energy-efficient as today's chips, an attractive trait given the increasing power consumption of the massive data centers that power the Internet's most popular sites. And superconducting chips also promise greater processing power: Superconducting circuits have been clocked at a Terahertz. More of my philosophy about energy efficiency of quantum computers and about IBM's Compute-in-memory and more of my thoughts.. I think i am smart, and i will say that IBM have invented the following Compute-in-memory specialized hardware that works in both analogue and digital so that to lower much more energy consumption, read about it here: IBM: Compute-in-memory beats GPUs by 10x, sometimes https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/research-news/ibm-compute-memory-beats-gpus-10x-sometimes-2021-11/ But i think that the much better solution than the above Compute-in-memory specialized hardware of IBM is to use the powerful quantum computers, and i invite you so that to read the following article about it: Quantum computers vastly outperform supercomputers when it comes to energy efficiency https://physicsworld.com/a/quantum-computers-vastly-outperform-supercomputers-when-it-comes-to-energy-efficiency/ Also i have just looked at the following article about the benchmark of Intel Xeon Scalable Processor vs. Nvidia V100 GPU, here it is: https://www.xcelerit.com/computing-benchmarks/insights/benchmarks-intel-xeon-scalable-processor-vs-nvidia-v100-gpu/ So i think that the main problem of Intel Xeons in the above benchmark is the memory bandwidth, so i think that the number of GFLOPs of Intel Xeons in the above benchmark is a result of multiplying the frequency of the CPU by the number of cores and by 2x8FMA, i mean fused multiply–add (FMA) instructions for floating-point scalar and SIMD operations, and it is giving a result of 2,240 GFLOPs, so then if you want to have a powerful computer that also have a good memory bandwidth, i advice you to use a new two socket for new Intel Xeon processors that support a memory bandwidth of like 5.2 GT/s for DDR5 x 8 bytes per channel x 12 channels for one socket, and that equals 499.2 GB per second or 998.4 GB per second for two sockets, and this will equal the memory bandwidth of the Nvidia V100 PCIe (Volta) in the above benchmark , and this will solve the memory bandwidth problem, and of course the two socket motherboard for a two new 64 cores Intel Xeon 3.4 Ghz will give you around 6963 GFLOPs as the Nvidia V100 PCIe (Volta). And i invite you so that to read my following thoughts about AVX-512 of AMD Zen 4, since i have just brought a little more precision to it: More of my philosophy about AVX-512 of AMD Zen 4 architecture and more of my thoughts.. I think AVX-512 of AMD Zen 4 architecture will not be a true, 512-bit wide SIMD as we find in Intel architecture, but Zen 4 will be executing these AVX-512 instructions over two cycles, so i think it will not require to lower the frequency of the cores when using AVX-512, as is doing it Intel, and i think that AMD is doing it this way for also "compatibility" with the Intel AVX-512, and you can read the following article so that to notice it: https://www.anandtech.com/show/17552/amd-details-ryzen-7000-launch-up-ryzen-7950x-coming-sept-27 More of my philosophy about directory-based coherence or hierarchical bus coherence and more of my thoughts.. I have just read the following interesting paper about Scaling SMP Machines Through Hierarchical Snooping, i invite you to read it: https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~kola/projectreports/cs757.pdf So i think that AMD and Intel, so that to scale SMP machines, are using two methods, so i think that they are for example using a bus topology inside a 8 cores CCX as NUMA node in for example AMD multicore machines, but they are using filters so that to reduce much more bus traffic, like in the above paper, and i think they are not using a full mesh topology between NUMA nodes, but they are using a much more efficient topology than that of a bus or ring, so i think they are using a kind of routing between NUMA nodes (after the address of the destination is discovered) so that to be efficient, so i think it is why 32 cores or 64 cores or 128 cores x86 machines are scaling well, and read my following thoughts about the network topology of multicores CPUs: More of my philosophy about the network topology in multicores CPUs.. I invite you to look at the following video: Ring or Mesh, or other? AMD's Future on CPU Connectivity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8teWvMXK99I&t=904s And i invite you to read the following article: Does an AMD Chiplet Have a Core Count Limit? Read more here: https://www.anandtech.com/show/16930/does-an-amd-chiplet-have-a-core-count-limit I think i am smart and i say that the above video and the above article are not so smart, so i will talk about a very important thing, and it is the following, read the following: Performance Scalability of a Multi-core Web Server https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221046211_Performance_scalability_of_a_multi-core_web_server So notice carefully that it is saying the following: "..we determined that performance scaling was limited by the capacity of the address bus, which became saturated on all eight cores. If this key obstacle is addressed, commercial web server and systems software are well-positioned to scale to a large number of cores." So as you notice they were using an Intel Xeon of 8 cores, and the application was scalable to 8x but the hardware was not scalable to 8x, since it was scalable only to 4.8x, and this was caused by the bus saturation, since the Address bus saturation causes poor scaling, and the Address Bus carries requests and responses for data, called snoops, and more caches mean more sources and more destinations for snoops that is causing the poor scaling, so as you notice that a network topology of a Ring bus or a bus was not sufficient so that to scale to 8x on an Intel Xeon with 8 cores, so i think that the new architectures like Epyc CPU and Threadripper CPU can use a faster bus or/and a different network topology that permits to both ensure a full scalability locally in the same node and globally between the nodes, so then we can notice that a sophisticated mesh network topology not only permits to reduce the number of hops inside the CPU for good latency, but it is also good for reliability by using its sophisticated redundancy and it is faster than previous topologies like the ring bus or the bus since for example the search on address bus becomes parallelized, and it looks like the internet network that uses mesh topology using routers, so it parallelizes, and i also think that using a more sophisticated topology like a mesh network topology is related to queuing theory since we can notice that in operational research the mathematics says that we can make the queue like M/M/1 more efficient by making the server more powerful, but we can notice that the knee of a M/M/1 queue is around 50% , so we can notice that by using a mesh topology like internet or inside a CPU, you can by parallelizing more you can in operational research both enhance the knee of the queue and the speed of executing the transactions and it is like using many servers in queuing theory and it permits to scale better inside a CPU or in internet. More of my philosophy about RISC-V and about open source and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it: RISC-V Chips Revolution is coming https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irH5eKzezsE But I don't think RISC-V is a good thing, since read the following about the open source problems: "RISC-V is open source, and open-source hardware centers on a design everybody is free to use and modify as they see fit. For its part, ARM claims that it has much more money to fund R&D and develop technology for its customers, whereas RISC-V International does not and merely provides an ISA. ARM also raised concerns that usage of RISC-V could result in "fragmentation," which is basically a lack of standards throughout an industry that creates an obstacle for compatibility in both hardware and software. Since ARM provides standardized cores, the risk of fragmentation is averted. Whereas RISC-V sees this standardization as a weakness, ARM argues it's a strength." Read more here: ARM vs. RISC-V: Is one better than the other? https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/arm-vs-risc-v/ And more of my writing about open |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment