- More of my philosophy about Patents and Copyrights and Trademarks and more of my thoughts.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy of from where comes dignity and more of my my thoughts.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about is morality just an intellectual construct or not and more of my thoughts.. - 1 Update
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 10 04:11PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about Patents and Copyrights and Trademarks and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and as you notice that the difference between a Patent, Copyright, and Trademark is: A patent protects new inventions, processes, or scientific creations, a trademark protects brands, logos, and slogans, and a copyright protects original works of authorship, but as you notice that my abstraction below of from where comes dignity also makes you understand that the Mastery in my abstraction below also means that you have to have a good education , and having a good education makes you correctly think and act by protecting with Patents and Copyrights and Trademarks, and it also makes you make laws and enforce them in a country or in a global world, and notice also that mastery in my abstraction below also means the mastery over nature , so it also means that you have to be inventive and creative, so as you notice that i think my abstraction below of from where comes dignity is correct, so reread my thoughts of my philosophy below that i have thought and written quickly so that you notice my kind of dignity and so that you notice my kind of personality: More of my philosophy of from where comes dignity and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, i will ask a philosophical question of: From where comes dignity ? I think that dignity comes not from big money or easy money, but dignity comes from what we call in french: "La maîtrise" or what we call in english "The mastery", like of the mastery of science and/or technology , so i mean that dignity comes from you having to master the tools of adaptation that makes you successful, so it is why the having a good education is the so important thing that brings dignity, so it is why you are noticing that my way of talking to you is like the talking of a good educated man, and this shows my kind of dignity or this shows my kind of personality, since for me the most important thing is that i have to master the tools of adaptation so that to be successful, and of course you can invent the tools of adaptation and it is not in logical contradiction , since inventing the tools of adaptation is also the understanding of them and is like the mastery of them, like my way of inventing my thoughts of my philosophy and my inventing many proverbs that i am posting here etc. More of my philosophy about is morality just an intellectual construct or not and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i have talked more about morality, and i will ask the following philosophical question: Is morality just an intellectual construct or not ? I think that individual morality comes from the individual interest, but being individual interest is not societal morality or general or global morality, so then societal morality comes from the societal interest, but here again notice that we can ask a philosophical question of: What is the societal or general or global interest ? I think that as i am explaining it in my thoughts of my philosophy, that the essence of morality comes from the fact that we want to adapt efficiently and to become more and more perfect so that to solve our problems and so that to be happy and so that to be greatly perfect or perfect, so it is the engine that creates morality, so then morality is not just an intellectual construct, but it also comes from the empirical, so then i can ask a philosophical question of: Is morality universal ? So i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following web link so that answers this philosophical question and that talks more about morality: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/s8IZ5i5Udm0 And you can read the rest of my "interesting" philosophical thoughts in the following web links so that to understand my views on different subjects: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vc32viYv1SY And read also my other thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/CmaowkjUJVY More of my philosophy about the pragmatic meaning of human life and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that you can, like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, logically infer that human existence is absurd, but i don't think it is the good way of measuring, since i think that there is also the "pragmatic" way of measuring, since i think that noticing that humans die or a part of humans suffer or the like is not the thing that must make us think that human existence is absurd, since the "pragmatic" way of measuring the meaning of human life is to notice that we have really progressed in the today human life compared to the old human life and we are really progressing in an exponential way, and i think that it is what gives the meaning of human life, so i think what remains is that we have to minimize at best or avoid wars and we have to be the right safety in managing the exponential progress of our humanity, and speaking about the exponential progress of our humanity, here is what i have said about it: More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts.. So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question of: From where comes the meaning of human life ? I think i am highly smart, and i say that you can by being relativism in philosophy says that human life has no meaning, so relativism in philosophy in its essence has a problem, but i think that the smart way of constructing a meaning of human life, is also to be the pragmatic way by giving weights of importance to things, it is like "prioritizing" by giving weights of importance so that to be successful, i mean look at human life, it is much better than the old human life, so this way of looking at it permits to give a weight of importance , and also the other way is also to say that humanity is in fact progressing in an exponential way, so we are progressing so rapidly, and this way also of looking at it gives a great weight of importance and those two ways of looking at human life gives optimism, so i think it is the way to construct a meaning of human life, and this way of constructing a meaning of human life looks like my answer below about the can we be enlightned or not, so as you are noticing that the pragmatic way of my answer below proceeds by giving weights of importance so that also enforce the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world. And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity: Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ And look in the following interesting article about how AI will create millions more Jobs than it Will destroy: https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/ So i think we have to be optimistic about this exponential progress of our humanity. More of my philosophy about enlightenment and more of my thoughts.. So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will invite you to look at the following video of the indian philosophy that is making a big mistake: The Bizarre Life Of An Enlightened Person https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzmGkRF2ggU So i am discovering in the above video patterns with my fluid intelligence that say to me that the above video of the indian philosophy is making a big mistake, since the above video of the indian philosophy is saying that you can not be enlightned, but it is "relativism" in philosophy that is not acceptable as morality, since also with this relativism we can also say that the smart humans among us are not smart humans, and this relativism brings an advantage of the being humbleness , but it also brings a disadvantage of being arrogance, so it is by logical analogy like the we can not say that you have to know how to use relativism like you have to know how to use a knife, since the normal distribution says that a not negligible percentage of humans are genetically violent, it is why i think that so that to be the right safety, we have to be the pragmatic way that also enforces the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world, so we have to for example say that the "highly smart" humans among us are the most important humans, since also they are like the most important engine that we have, since we can easily notice that without the highly smart humans, humanity becomes inferior like inferior animals, and it is why i have just said the following: More of my philosophy about how to create in new type of man and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i think that it is possible to create a kind of new sophisticated type of human or man, so i think i have just explained in my below thoughts of my philosophy how to be hope and how to be a positive energy, but i think one of the most important thing is to ask a the following philosophical question: What is the mechanisms that make a human be efficient at adaptation and perfection ? So i think that i have also just talked in my below thoughts of my philosophy about the first mechanism that is that when you become more and more perfect, you begin to notice that human life becomes more and more easy for you, since for example when you become more and more educated , you become more and more smart, so then for example the "reusability" of this smartness makes human life more easy for you, but not only that, but the second mechanism is that we have to organize knowledge and information such as on internet in such way that it becomes easy to find the efficient and high quality knowledge and information, so then you have to be "selective" in such way of your knowledge and information so that to be efficient. And of course i have also just said that this becoming more and more smart and more and more selective can hurt and can hurt business, and here is what i have just said about it: More of my philosophy about the radical form of governance and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and as you have just noticed i have just talked about the Volksgemeinschaft and about neo-Nazism, read it below, and as you have noticed i have just talked about the radical form of governance where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), so this way of governance has not worked, but today the way of governance has changed and i think that it is proceeding by the way of introducing appropriate, rational reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments and by monitoring with statistics, other than that there is also another radical form of governance that says that we have to be the radical form of class struggle as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but i think that this way of doing has not worked since this radical way of class struggle renders people too much hateful(filled with hatred), since in this radical form of Class Struggle, the lower classes in the society hate the upper classes and the upper classes hate the lower classes, so this kind of radical form of Class Struggle doesn't work and it is not good for business, since i say that in business we have even to be disciplined at buying a product or service even if we don't love them, since for example i can say that when you become more and more educated, so then you become more and more smart, so then you become more and more "selective" of products and of services and of humans and this can hurt and this can hurt business, so then i think that the solution of this problem is for example to become disciplined at buying a product or service even if you don't love them, and of course you are noticing that we have to make people aware of it by educating them correctly. And here is what i say more about Class struggle: And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism, so i will first ask a philosophical question of: Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ? I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism, since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions. More of my philosophy about thesis and antithesis and |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 10 01:40PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy of from where comes dignity and more of my my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, i will ask a philosophical question of: From where comes dignity ? I think that dignity comes not from big money or easy money, but dignity comes from what we call in french: "La maîtrise" or what we call in english "The mastery", like of the mastery of science and/or technology , so i mean that dignity comes from you having to master the tools of adaptation that makes you successful, so it is why the having a good education is the so important thing that brings dignity, so it is why you are noticing that my way of talking to you is like the talking of a good educated man, and this shows my kind of dignity or this shows my kind of personality, since for me the most important thing is that i have to master the tools of adaptation, and of course you can invent the tools of adaptation and this is not in logical contradiction , since inventing the tools of adaptation is also the understanding of them and is like the mastery of them, like my way of inventing my thoughts of my philosophy and my inventing many proverbs that i am posting here etc. More of my philosophy about is morality just an intellectual construct or not and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i have talked more about morality, and i will ask the following philosophical question: Is morality just an intellectual construct or not ? I think that individual morality comes from the individual interest, but being individual interest is not societal morality or general or global morality, so then social morality comes from the societal interest, but here again notice that we can ask a philosophical question of: What is the societal or general or global interest ? I think that as i am explaining it in my thoughts of my philosophy, that the essence of morality comes from the fact that we want to adapt efficiently and to become more and more perfect so that to solve our problems and so that to be happy and so that to be greatly perfect or perfect, so it is the engine that creates morality, so then morality is not just an intellectual construct, but it also comes from the empirical, so then i can ask a philosophical question of: Is morality universal ? So i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following web link so that answers this philosophical question and that talks more about morality: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/s8IZ5i5Udm0 And you can read the rest of my "interesting" philosophical thoughts in the following web links so that to understand my views on different subjects: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vc32viYv1SY And read also my other thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/CmaowkjUJVY More of my philosophy about the pragmatic meaning of human life and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that you can, like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, logically infer that human existence is absurd, but i don't think it is the good way of measuring, since i think that there is also the "pragmatic" way of measuring, since i think that noticing that humans die or a part of humans suffer or the like is not the thing that must make us think that human existence is absurd, since the "pragmatic" way of measuring the meaning of human life is to notice that we have really progressed in the today human life compared to the old human life and we are really progressing in an exponential way, and i think that it is what gives the meaning of human life, so i think what remains is that we have to minimize at best or avoid wars and we have to be the right safety in managing the exponential progress of our humanity, and speaking about the exponential progress of our humanity, here is what i have said about it: More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts.. So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question of: From where comes the meaning of human life ? I think i am highly smart, and i say that you can by being relativism in philosophy says that human life has no meaning, so relativism in philosophy in its essence has a problem, but i think that the smart way of constructing a meaning of human life, is also to be the pragmatic way by giving weights of importance to things, it is like "prioritizing" by giving weights of importance so that to be successful, i mean look at human life, it is much better than the old human life, so this way of looking at it permits to give a weight of importance , and also the other way is also to say that humanity is in fact progressing in an exponential way, so we are progressing so rapidly, and this way also of looking at it gives a great weight of importance and those two ways of looking at human life gives optimism, so i think it is the way to construct a meaning of human life, and this way of constructing a meaning of human life looks like my answer below about the can we be enlightned or not, so as you are noticing that the pragmatic way of my answer below proceeds by giving weights of importance so that also enforce the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world. And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity: Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ And look in the following interesting article about how AI will create millions more Jobs than it Will destroy: https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/ So i think we have to be optimistic about this exponential progress of our humanity. More of my philosophy about enlightenment and more of my thoughts.. So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will invite you to look at the following video of the indian philosophy that is making a big mistake: The Bizarre Life Of An Enlightened Person https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzmGkRF2ggU So i am discovering in the above video patterns with my fluid intelligence that say to me that the above video of the indian philosophy is making a big mistake, since the above video of the indian philosophy is saying that you can not be enlightned, but it is "relativism" in philosophy that is not acceptable as morality, since also with this relativism we can also say that the smart humans among us are not smart humans, and this relativism brings an advantage of the being humbleness , but it also brings a disadvantage of being arrogance, so it is by logical analogy like the we can not say that you have to know how to use relativism like you have to know how to use a knife, since the normal distribution says that a not negligible percentage of humans are genetically violent, it is why i think that so that to be the right safety, we have to be the pragmatic way that also enforces the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world, so we have to for example say that the "highly smart" humans among us are the most important humans, since also they are like the most important engine that we have, since we can easily notice that without the highly smart humans, humanity becomes inferior like inferior animals, and it is why i have just said the following: More of my philosophy about how to create in new type of man and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i think that it is possible to create a kind of new sophisticated type of human or man, so i think i have just explained in my below thoughts of my philosophy how to be hope and how to be a positive energy, but i think one of the most important thing is to ask a the following philosophical question: What is the mechanisms that make a human be efficient at adaptation and perfection ? So i think that i have also just talked in my below thoughts of my philosophy about the first mechanism that is that when you become more and more perfect, you begin to notice that human life becomes more and more easy for you, since for example when you become more and more educated , you become more and more smart, so then for example the "reusability" of this smartness makes human life more easy for you, but not only that, but the second mechanism is that we have to organize knowledge and information such as on internet in such way that it becomes easy to find the efficient and high quality knowledge and information, so then you have to be "selective" in such way of your knowledge and information so that to be efficient. And of course i have also just said that this becoming more and more smart and more and more selective can hurt and can hurt business, and here is what i have just said about it: More of my philosophy about the radical form of governance and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and as you have just noticed i have just talked about the Volksgemeinschaft and about neo-Nazism, read it below, and as you have noticed i have just talked about the radical form of governance where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), so this way of governance has not worked, but today the way of governance has changed and i think that it is proceeding by the way of introducing appropriate, rational reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments and by monitoring with statistics, other than that there is also another radical form of governance that says that we have to be the radical form of class struggle as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but i think that this way of doing has not worked since this radical way of class struggle renders people too much hateful(filled with hatred), since in this radical form of Class Struggle, the lower classes in the society hate the upper classes and the upper classes hate the lower classes, so this kind of radical form of Class Struggle doesn't work and it is not good for business, since i say that in business we have even to be disciplined at buying a product or service even if we don't love them, since for example i can say that when you become more and more educated, so then you become more and more smart, so then you become more and more "selective" of products and of services and of humans and this can hurt and this can hurt business, so then i think that the solution of this problem is for example to become disciplined at buying a product or service even if you don't love them, and of course you are noticing that we have to make people aware of it by educating them correctly. And here is what i say more about Class struggle: And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism, so i will first ask a philosophical question of: Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ? I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism, since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions. More of my philosophy about thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism and about competition and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism of marxism and communism, is by logical analogy like the process of competition between ideas or between people that brings quality, so you can have a "synthesis" of private property and socialism understood as thesis and antithesis, and you can have collision of the bourgeoisie and the working class as competing thesis and antithesis that can bring a synthesis as quality, so i think that marxism and communism say that the bourgeoisie of the capitalistic system is not capable of treating correctly the working class, and i think it is from where comes marxism, but i think that this way of thinking is too extremist in our today world , since i have just for example said that workers living standards depend on wage levels, not wage ratios, eventhough when measuring wage dispersion, economists frequently look at the 90/50 ratio, so i think that we have not to be pessimistic |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 10 12:00PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about is morality just an intellectual construct or not and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i have talked more about morality, and i will ask the following philosophical question: Is morality just an intellectual construct or not ? I think that individual morality comes from the individual interest, but being individual interest is not societal morality or general or global morality, so then social morality comes from the societal interest, but here again notice that we can ask a philosophical question of: What is the societal or general or global interest ? I think that as i am explaining it in my thoughts of my philosophy, that the essence of morality comes from the fact that we want to adapt efficiently and to become more and more perfect so that to solve our problems and so that to be happy and so that to be greatly perfect or perfect, so it is the engine that creates morality, so then morality is not just an intellectual construct, but it also comes from the empirical, so then i can ask a philosophical question of: Is morality universal ? So i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following web link so that answers this philosophical question and that talks more about morality: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/s8IZ5i5Udm0 And you can read the rest of my "interesting" philosophical thoughts in the following web links so that to understand my views on different subjects: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vc32viYv1SY And read also my other thoughts of my philosophy here: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/CmaowkjUJVY More of my philosophy about the pragmatic meaning of human life and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that you can, like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, logically infer that human existence is absurd, but i don't think it is the good way of measuring, since i think that there is also the "pragmatic" way of measuring, since i think that noticing that humans die or a part of humans suffer or the like is not the thing that must make us think that human existence is absurd, since the "pragmatic" way of measuring the meaning of human life is to notice that we have really progressed in the today human life compared to the old human life and we are really progressing in an exponential way, and i think that it is what gives the meaning of human life, so i think what remains is that we have to minimize at best or avoid wars and we have to be the right safety in managing the exponential progress of our humanity, and speaking about the exponential progress of our humanity, here is what i have said about it: More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts.. So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question of: From where comes the meaning of human life ? I think i am highly smart, and i say that you can by being relativism in philosophy says that human life has no meaning, so relativism in philosophy in its essence has a problem, but i think that the smart way of constructing a meaning of human life, is also to be the pragmatic way by giving weights of importance to things, it is like "prioritizing" by giving weights of importance so that to be successful, i mean look at human life, it is much better than the old human life, so this way of looking at it permits to give a weight of importance , and also the other way is also to say that humanity is in fact progressing in an exponential way, so we are progressing so rapidly, and this way also of looking at it gives a great weight of importance and those two ways of looking at human life gives optimism, so i think it is the way to construct a meaning of human life, and this way of constructing a meaning of human life looks like my answer below about the can we be enlightned or not, so as you are noticing that the pragmatic way of my answer below proceeds by giving weights of importance so that also enforce the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world. And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity: Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ And look in the following interesting article about how AI will create millions more Jobs than it Will destroy: https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/ So i think we have to be optimistic about this exponential progress of our humanity. More of my philosophy about enlightenment and more of my thoughts.. So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will invite you to look at the following video of the indian philosophy that is making a big mistake: The Bizarre Life Of An Enlightened Person https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzmGkRF2ggU So i am discovering in the above video patterns with my fluid intelligence that say to me that the above video of the indian philosophy is making a big mistake, since the above video of the indian philosophy is saying that you can not be enlightned, but it is "relativism" in philosophy that is not acceptable as morality, since also with this relativism we can also say that the smart humans among us are not smart humans, and this relativism brings an advantage of the being humbleness , but it also brings a disadvantage of being arrogance, so it is by logical analogy like the we can not say that you have to know how to use relativism like you have to know how to use a knife, since the normal distribution says that a not negligible percentage of humans are genetically violent, it is why i think that so that to be the right safety, we have to be the pragmatic way that also enforces the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world, so we have to for example say that the "highly smart" humans among us are the most important humans, since also they are like the most important engine that we have, since we can easily notice that without the highly smart humans, humanity becomes inferior like inferior animals, and it is why i have just said the following: More of my philosophy about how to create in new type of man and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i think that it is possible to create a kind of new sophisticated type of human or man, so i think i have just explained in my below thoughts of my philosophy how to be hope and how to be a positive energy, but i think one of the most important thing is to ask a the following philosophical question: What is the mechanisms that make a human be efficient at adaptation and perfection ? So i think that i have also just talked in my below thoughts of my philosophy about the first mechanism that is that when you become more and more perfect, you begin to notice that human life becomes more and more easy for you, since for example when you become more and more educated , you become more and more smart, so then for example the "reusability" of this smartness makes human life more easy for you, but not only that, but the second mechanism is that we have to organize knowledge and information such as on internet in such way that it becomes easy to find the efficient and high quality knowledge and information, so then you have to be "selective" in such way of your knowledge and information so that to be efficient. And of course i have also just said that this becoming more and more smart and more and more selective can hurt and can hurt business, and here is what i have just said about it: More of my philosophy about the radical form of governance and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and as you have just noticed i have just talked about the Volksgemeinschaft and about neo-Nazism, read it below, and as you have noticed i have just talked about the radical form of governance where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), so this way of governance has not worked, but today the way of governance has changed and i think that it is proceeding by the way of introducing appropriate, rational reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments and by monitoring with statistics, other than that there is also another radical form of governance that says that we have to be the radical form of class struggle as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but i think that this way of doing has not worked since this radical way of class struggle renders people too much hateful(filled with hatred), since in this radical form of Class Struggle, the lower classes in the society hate the upper classes and the upper classes hate the lower classes, so this kind of radical form of Class Struggle doesn't work and it is not good for business, since i say that in business we have even to be disciplined at buying a product or service even if we don't love them, since for example i can say that when you become more and more educated, so then you become more and more smart, so then you become more and more "selective" of products and of services and of humans and this can hurt and this can hurt business, so then i think that the solution of this problem is for example to become disciplined at buying a product or service even if you don't love them, and of course you are noticing that we have to make people aware of it by educating them correctly. And here is what i say more about Class struggle: And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism, so i will first ask a philosophical question of: Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ? I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism, since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions. More of my philosophy about thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism and about competition and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism of marxism and communism, is by logical analogy like the process of competition between ideas or between people that brings quality, so you can have a "synthesis" of private property and socialism understood as thesis and antithesis, and you can have collision of the bourgeoisie and the working class as competing thesis and antithesis that can bring a synthesis as quality, so i think that marxism and communism say that the bourgeoisie of the capitalistic system is not capable of treating correctly the working class, and i think it is from where comes marxism, but i think that this way of thinking is too extremist in our today world , since i have just for example said that workers living standards depend on wage levels, not wage ratios, eventhough when measuring wage dispersion, economists frequently look at the 90/50 ratio, so i think that we have not to be pessimistic about the living standards that has brought capitalism, and you can read all my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice it: More of my philosophy about the Volksgemeinschaft and about neo-Nazism and more of my thoughts.. And read the following article so that you understand more: Germany seeks ban on neo-Nazis https://wc.arizona.edu/papers/94/58/01_96_m.html And I invite you to read the following article from a white supremacist and neo-nazi website called national vanguard: https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/04/cosmotheism-in-savitri-devi-2/ And notice that it is saying the following about national socialism of the white supremacism and neo-nazism: "[National Socialism] aimed at stemming the physical and moral decay of modern, technically "advanced" humanity by forcing it — by forcing its racial élite, at least — to live in accordance with the ultimate purpose of Nature, which is not to make individuals "happy," nor even to make, nations "happy," but to evolve supermankind — living godhead — out of the existing master races, first of all, out of the pure Aryan. Happiness is a bourgeois conception, definitely. It is not our concern. We want animals to be happy — and inferior men, also, to the extent their happiness does not disturb the New Order. We believe higher mankind has better things to do. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment