- How do I look inside an .exe file to view the programming - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about what are the successful technologies and about the business model and more of my thoughts.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about the German model and about quality and more of my thoughts.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy about US vs China fight to control the world's most critical technology and more of my thoughts.. - 1 Update
- More of my philosophy and more precision about virtual patriotism and more of my thoughts.. - 1 Update
| Mathew Burkitt <mathew.burkitt@dimension.technology>: Sep 13 03:17AM -0700 Yeah, what ever happened to the netiquette maxim "don't bite the newbies"? We were all there once. |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 12 03:36PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about what are the successful technologies and about the business model and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i have just looked at the following video of Bill Gates, and i invite you to look at it: The Xerox Thieves: Steve Jobs & Bill Gates https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQocN_c2uLI&t I think i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence in the above video, and i think that Bill Gates was successful with his Microsoft since it was the early period of software development, and as i say in french: "Je pense que c'etait aussi une conjoncture" , and it means in english: "I think that it was also a conjuncture", but the most important factor of success in this conjoncture is the: it was the early period of software development, but today it is different, since you have to know where you have to invest in software development so that to be rich and successful, so i think that for example if you invest in security like internet security and such, i think it is a really a good investment, also you have to invest in software development that has a high return of investment, and that means that the software has also to be expected to grow big , and i think that so that to be successful in software development, the software that you develop has to also be of high quality, since there is a strong competition with open source etc. also notice that this requirement of being of high quality is much more difficult to realize(it means to happen), so it is why i think that we have to think about other ways of doing in software development, such as for example to come with a new smart business plan that solves this problem, so i think that the smart business plan is so important in business. More of my philosophy about the German model and about quality and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i will ask the following philosophical question of: Why is Germany so successful in spite of least working hours? So i think one of the most important factors are: Of course the first factor is that Germany has good schools and vocational training - for everyone. This makes the average worker much more productive in terms of value add per hour. And the second "really" important factor is the following: It's in the culture of Germany to focus on quality and being effective (all the way back to Martin Luther and his protestant work ethic)... Higher quality in every step of the chain leads to a massive reduction in defects and rework. This increases everyone's productivity. But notice that i am also speaking in my below thoughts about the other ways to increase productivity by being specialization etc., and the way of the German model to focus on quality and being effective by also focusing on quality in every step of the chain that leads to a massive reduction in defects and rework, is also done by the following methodologies of quality control and Six Sigma etc., so read my following thoughts about them: More of my philosophy about quality control and more of my thoughts.. I have just looked and understood quickly the following paper about SPC(Statistical process control): https://owic.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/pubs/EM8733.pdf I think i am highly smart, but i think that the above paper doesn't speak about the fact that you can apply the central limit theorem as following: The central limit theorem states that the sampling distribution of the mean of any independent, random variable will be normal or nearly normal, if the sample size is large enough. Also the above paper doesn't speak about the following very important things: And I have quickly understood quality control with SPC(Statistical process control) and i have just discovered a smart pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that with SPC(Statistical process control) we can debug the process, like in software programming, by looking at its variability, so if the variability doesn't follow a normal distribution, so it means that there are defects in the process, and we say that there is special causes that causes those defects, and if the variability follows a normal distribution, we say that the process is stable and it has only common causes, and it means that we can control it much more easily by looking at the control charts that permit to debug and control the variability by for example changing the machines or robots and looking at the control charts and measuring again with the control charts More of my philosophy about the Post Graduate Program on lean Six Sigma and more.. More of my philosophy about Six Sigma and more.. I think i am smart, and now i will talk more about Six Sigma since i have just talked about SPC(Statistical quality control), so you have to know that Six Sigma needs to fulfill the following steps: 1- Define the project goals and customer (external and internal) deliverables. 2- Control future performance so improved process doesn't degrade. 3- Measure the process so that to determine current performance and quantify the problem. 4- Analyze and determine the root cause(s) of the defects. 5- Improve the process by eliminating the defects. And you have to know that those steps are also important steps toward attaining ISO 9000 certification, and notice that you can use SPC(Statistical process control) and the control charts on step [4] and step [5] above. Other than that i have just read the following interesting important paper about SPC(Statistical process control) that explains all the process of SPC(Statistical process control), so i invite you to read it carefully: https://owic.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/pubs/EM8733.pdf So as you notice in the above paper that the central limit theorem in mathematics is so important, but notice carefully that the necessary and important condition so that the central limit theorem works is that you have to use independent and random variables, and notice in the above paper that you have to do two things and it's that you have to reduce or eliminate the defects and you have to control the "variability" of the defects, and this is why the paper is talking about how to construct a control chart. Other than that the central limit theorem is not only related to SPC(Statistical process control), but it is also related to PERT and my PERT++ software project below, and notice that in my software project below that is called PERT++, i have provided you with two ways of how to estimate the critical path, first, by the way of CPM(Critical Path Method) that shows all the arcs of the estimate of the critical path, and the second way is by the way of the central limit theorem by using the inverse normal distribution function, and you have to provide my software project that is called PERT++ with three types of estimates that are the following: Optimistic time - generally the shortest time in which the activity can be completed. It is common practice to specify optimistic times to be three standard deviations from the mean so that there is approximately a 1% chance that the activity will be completed within the optimistic time. Most likely time - the completion time having the highest probability. Note that this time is different from the expected time. Pessimistic time - the longest time that an activity might require. Three standard deviations from the mean is commonly used for the pessimistic time. And you can download my PERT++ from reading my following below thoughts: More of my philosophy about the central limit theorem and about my PERT++ and more.. The central limit theorem states that the sampling distribution of the mean of any independent, random variable will be normal or nearly normal, if the sample size is large enough. How large is "large enough"? In practice, some statisticians say that a sample size of 30 is large enough when the population distribution is roughly bell-shaped. Others recommend a sample size of at least 40. But if the original population is distinctly not normal (e.g., is badly skewed, has multiple peaks, and/or has outliers), researchers like the sample size to be even larger. So i invite you to read my following thoughts about my software project that is called PERT++, and notice that the PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. And as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is also so important for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)): An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC) https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal --- So I have provided you in my PERT++ with the following functions: function NormalDistA (const Mean, StdDev, AVal, BVal: Extended): Single; function NormalDistP (const Mean, StdDev, AVal: Extended): Single; function InvNormalDist(const Mean, StdDev, PVal: Extended; const Less: Boolean): Extended; For NormalDistA() or NormalDistP(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the probability of the value Aval or the probability between the values of Aval and Bval. For InvNormalDist(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the length of the critical path of the probability PVal, and when Less is TRUE, you will obtain a cumulative distribution. So as you are noticing from my above thoughts that since PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So then you have to use my above functions that are Normal distribution and inverse normal distribution functions, please look at my demo inside my zip file to understand better how i am doing it: You can download and read about my PERT++ from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal I think i am smart and i invite you to read carefully the following webpage of Alan Robinson Professor of Operations Management at University of Massachusetts and that is a full-time professor at the Isenberg School of Management of UMass and a consultant and book author specializing in managing ideas (idea-generation and idea-driven organization) and building high-performance organizations, creativity, innovation, quality, and lean management: https://www.simplilearn.com/pgp-lean-six-sigma-certification-training-course?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=&utm_content=11174393172-108220153863-506962883161&utm_device=c&utm_campaign=Display-MQL-DigitalOperationsCluster-PG-QM-CLSS-UMass-YTVideoInstreamCustomIntent-US-Main-AllDevice-adgroup-QM-Desktop-CI&gclid=Cj0KCQiA3rKQBhCNARIsACUEW_ZGLHcUP2htLdQo46zP6Eo2-vX0MQYvc-o6GQP55638Up4tex85RBEaArn9EALw_wcB And notice in the above webpage of the professor, that he is giving Post Graduate Program in Lean Six Sigma and on agile methodology, and i think that this Post Graduate Program is easy for me since i am really smart and i can easily understand lean Six Sigma or Six Sigma and i can easily understand agile methodology, and notice that i am in my below thoughts also explaining much more smartly what is agile methodology, and i think that the more difficult part of Six Sigma or lean Six Sigma is to understand the central limit theorem and to understand what is SPC(Statistical quality control) and how to use the control charts so that to control the variability of the defects, and notice that i am talking about it in my below thoughts, but i think that the rest of lean Six Sigma and Six Sigma is easy for me. More of my philosophy about IQ tests and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart, and I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, but i have just passed more and more IQ tests, and i have just noticed that the manner in wich we test with IQ tests is not correct, since in an IQ test you can be more specialized and above average in one subtest of intelligence than in another subtest of intelligence inside an IQ test, since IQ tests test for many kind of intelligences such as the spatial and speed and calculations and logical intelligence etc., so i think that you can be really above average in logical intelligence, as i am really above average in logical intelligence, but at the same time you can be below average in calculations and/or spatial.., so since an IQ test doesn't test for this kind of specializations of intelligence, so i think it is not good, since testing for this kind specializations in intelligence is really important so that to be efficient by knowing the strong advantages of this or that person in every types of intelligences. And about the importance of specialization, read carefully my following thought about it: More of my philosophy about specialization and about efficiency and productivity.. The previous CEO Larry Culp of General Electric and the architect of a strategy that represented a new turning point in the world corporate strategies, Larry Culp's strategy was to divide the company according to its activities. Something like we are better of alone, seperately and focused on each one's own activity, than together in a large conglomerate. And it is a move from integration to specialization. You see it is thought that a company always gains economies of scale as it grows, but this is not necessarily the case, since as the company gains in size - especially if it engages in many activities - it also generates its own bureaucracy, with all that entails in term of cost and efficiency. And not only that, it is also often the case that by bringing together very different activities, strategic focus is lost and decision-making is diluted, so that in the end no one ends up taking responsability, it doesn't always happen, but this reasons are basically what is driving this increasing specialization. So i invite to look at the following video so that to understand more about it: The decline of industrial icon of the US - VisualPolitik EN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hqwYxFCY-k And here is my previous thoughts about |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 12 01:06PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about the German model and about quality and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i will ask the following philosophical question of: Why is Germany so successful in spite of least working hours? So i think one of the most important factors are: Of course the first factor is that Germany has good schools and vocational training - for everyone. This makes the average worker much more productive in terms of value add per hour. And the second "really" important factor is the following: It's in the culture of Germany to focus on quality and being effective (all the way back to Martin Luther and his protestant work ethic)... Higher quality in every step of the chain leads to a massive reduction in defects and rework. This increases everyone's productivity. But notice that i am also speaking in my below thoughts about the other ways to increase productivity by being specialization etc., and the way of the German model to focus on quality and being effective by also focusing on quality in every step of the chain that leads to a massive reduction in defects and rework, is also done by the following methodologies of quality control and Six Sigma etc., so read my following thoughts about them: More of my philosophy about quality control and more of my thoughts.. I have just looked and understood quickly the following paper about SPC(Statistical process control): https://owic.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/pubs/EM8733.pdf I think i am highly smart, but i think that the above paper doesn't speak about the fact that you can apply the central limit theorem as following: The central limit theorem states that the sampling distribution of the mean of any independent, random variable will be normal or nearly normal, if the sample size is large enough. Also the above paper doesn't speak about the following very important things: And I have quickly understood quality control with SPC(Statistical process control) and i have just discovered a smart pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that with SPC(Statistical process control) we can debug the process, like in software programming, by looking at its variability, so if the variability doesn't follow a normal distribution, so it means that there are defects in the process, and we say that there is special causes that causes those defects, and if the variability follows a normal distribution, we say that the process is stable and it has only common causes, and it means that we can control it much more easily by looking at the control charts that permit to debug and control the variability by for example changing the machines or robots and looking at the control charts and measuring again with the control charts More of my philosophy about the Post Graduate Program on lean Six Sigma and more.. More of my philosophy about Six Sigma and more.. I think i am smart, and now i will talk more about Six Sigma since i have just talked about SPC(Statistical quality control), so you have to know that Six Sigma needs to fulfill the following steps: 1- Define the project goals and customer (external and internal) deliverables. 2- Control future performance so improved process doesn't degrade. 3- Measure the process so that to determine current performance and quantify the problem. 4- Analyze and determine the root cause(s) of the defects. 5- Improve the process by eliminating the defects. And you have to know that those steps are also important steps toward attaining ISO 9000 certification, and notice that you can use SPC(Statistical process control) and the control charts on step [4] and step [5] above. Other than that i have just read the following interesting important paper about SPC(Statistical process control) that explains all the process of SPC(Statistical process control), so i invite you to read it carefully: https://owic.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/pubs/EM8733.pdf So as you notice in the above paper that the central limit theorem in mathematics is so important, but notice carefully that the necessary and important condition so that the central limit theorem works is that you have to use independent and random variables, and notice in the above paper that you have to do two things and it's that you have to reduce or eliminate the defects and you have to control the "variability" of the defects, and this is why the paper is talking about how to construct a control chart. Other than that the central limit theorem is not only related to SPC(Statistical process control), but it is also related to PERT and my PERT++ software project below, and notice that in my software project below that is called PERT++, i have provided you with two ways of how to estimate the critical path, first, by the way of CPM(Critical Path Method) that shows all the arcs of the estimate of the critical path, and the second way is by the way of the central limit theorem by using the inverse normal distribution function, and you have to provide my software project that is called PERT++ with three types of estimates that are the following: Optimistic time - generally the shortest time in which the activity can be completed. It is common practice to specify optimistic times to be three standard deviations from the mean so that there is approximately a 1% chance that the activity will be completed within the optimistic time. Most likely time - the completion time having the highest probability. Note that this time is different from the expected time. Pessimistic time - the longest time that an activity might require. Three standard deviations from the mean is commonly used for the pessimistic time. And you can download my PERT++ from reading my following below thoughts: More of my philosophy about the central limit theorem and about my PERT++ and more.. The central limit theorem states that the sampling distribution of the mean of any independent, random variable will be normal or nearly normal, if the sample size is large enough. How large is "large enough"? In practice, some statisticians say that a sample size of 30 is large enough when the population distribution is roughly bell-shaped. Others recommend a sample size of at least 40. But if the original population is distinctly not normal (e.g., is badly skewed, has multiple peaks, and/or has outliers), researchers like the sample size to be even larger. So i invite you to read my following thoughts about my software project that is called PERT++, and notice that the PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. And as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is also so important for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)): An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC) https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal --- So I have provided you in my PERT++ with the following functions: function NormalDistA (const Mean, StdDev, AVal, BVal: Extended): Single; function NormalDistP (const Mean, StdDev, AVal: Extended): Single; function InvNormalDist(const Mean, StdDev, PVal: Extended; const Less: Boolean): Extended; For NormalDistA() or NormalDistP(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the probability of the value Aval or the probability between the values of Aval and Bval. For InvNormalDist(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the length of the critical path of the probability PVal, and when Less is TRUE, you will obtain a cumulative distribution. So as you are noticing from my above thoughts that since PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So then you have to use my above functions that are Normal distribution and inverse normal distribution functions, please look at my demo inside my zip file to understand better how i am doing it: You can download and read about my PERT++ from my website here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal I think i am smart and i invite you to read carefully the following webpage of Alan Robinson Professor of Operations Management at University of Massachusetts and that is a full-time professor at the Isenberg School of Management of UMass and a consultant and book author specializing in managing ideas (idea-generation and idea-driven organization) and building high-performance organizations, creativity, innovation, quality, and lean management: https://www.simplilearn.com/pgp-lean-six-sigma-certification-training-course?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=&utm_content=11174393172-108220153863-506962883161&utm_device=c&utm_campaign=Display-MQL-DigitalOperationsCluster-PG-QM-CLSS-UMass-YTVideoInstreamCustomIntent-US-Main-AllDevice-adgroup-QM-Desktop-CI&gclid=Cj0KCQiA3rKQBhCNARIsACUEW_ZGLHcUP2htLdQo46zP6Eo2-vX0MQYvc-o6GQP55638Up4tex85RBEaArn9EALw_wcB And notice in the above webpage of the professor, that he is giving Post Graduate Program in Lean Six Sigma and on agile methodology, and i think that this Post Graduate Program is easy for me since i am really smart and i can easily understand lean Six Sigma or Six Sigma and i can easily understand agile methodology, and notice that i am in my below thoughts also explaining much more smartly what is agile methodology, and i think that the more difficult part of Six Sigma or lean Six Sigma is to understand the central limit theorem and to understand what is SPC(Statistical quality control) and how to use the control charts so that to control the variability of the defects, and notice that i am talking about it in my below thoughts, but i think that the rest of lean Six Sigma and Six Sigma is easy for me. More of my philosophy about IQ tests and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart, and I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, but i have just passed more and more IQ tests, and i have just noticed that the manner in wich we test with IQ tests is not correct, since in an IQ test you can be more specialized and above average in one subtest of intelligence than in another subtest of intelligence inside an IQ test, since IQ tests test for many kind of intelligences such as the spatial and speed and calculations and logical intelligence etc., so i think that you can be really above average in logical intelligence, as i am really above average in logical intelligence, but at the same time you can be below average in calculations and/or spatial.., so since an IQ test doesn't test for this kind of specializations of intelligence, so i think it is not good, since testing for this kind specializations in intelligence is really important so that to be efficient by knowing the strong advantages of this or that person in every types of intelligences. And about the importance of specialization, read carefully my following thought about it: More of my philosophy about specialization and about efficiency and productivity.. The previous CEO Larry Culp of General Electric and the architect of a strategy that represented a new turning point in the world corporate strategies, Larry Culp's strategy was to divide the company according to its activities. Something like we are better of alone, seperately and focused on each one's own activity, than together in a large conglomerate. And it is a move from integration to specialization. You see it is thought that a company always gains economies of scale as it grows, but this is not necessarily the case, since as the company gains in size - especially if it engages in many activities - it also generates its own bureaucracy, with all that entails in term of cost and efficiency. And not only that, it is also often the case that by bringing together very different activities, strategic focus is lost and decision-making is diluted, so that in the end no one ends up taking responsability, it doesn't always happen, but this reasons are basically what is driving this increasing specialization. So i invite to look at the following video so that to understand more about it: The decline of industrial icon of the US - VisualPolitik EN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hqwYxFCY-k And here is my previous thoughts about specialization and productivity so that to understand much more: More about the Japanese Ikigai and about productivity and more of my thoughts.. Read the following interesting article about Japanese Ikigai: The More People With Purpose, the Better the World Will Be https://singularityhub.com/2018/06/15/the-more-people-with-purpose-the-better-the-world-will-be/ I think i am highly smart, so i say that the Japanese Ikigai is like a Japanese philosophy that is like the right combination or "balance" of passion, vocation, and mission, and Ikigai and MTP, as concepts, urge us to align our passions with a mission to better the world, but i think that Japanese Ikiai is a also smart since it gets the "passion" from the "mission", since the mission is also the engine, so you have to align the passion with the mission of the country or the global world so that to be efficient, and Japanese Ikigai is also smart since so that to higher productivity and be efficient, you have to "specialize" in doing a job, but so that to higher more productivity and be more efficient you can also specialize in what you do "better", and it is what is doing Japanese Ikigai, since i think that in Japanese Ikigai, being the passion permits to make you specialized in a job in what you do better, and here is what i have just smartly said about productivity: I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will now talk about another important idea of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and it is about "specialization" in an economic system, since i say that in an economic system we have to be specialized in doing a job so that to be efficient and productive, but not only that, but we have to specialize in doing a job in what we do better so that to be even more efficient and productive, and we |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 12 10:33AM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about US vs China fight to control the world's most critical technology and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i have just said the following: "I say that internet is a "place" one can visit: Buildings of varying importance that are related to its facilitation and management are scattered all over the world, and are situated contrary to typical notions of a connected world. The internet connects cities, countries and continents via fiber-optic cables that follow the shortest path between two points. So internet is place, so i think it can play the role of like a virtual country, so i think that a narrow definition of patriotism is to say that it is about patriotism of a country, but i think that this narrow definition is not correct, since you have to understand the essence of patriotism, i mean that its fondamental characteristics are about the to Love and to support, and i think that its essence comes from when you understand that for example an american x86 CPU of AMD or Intel is so important for you and it is substantially beneficial for you, and since also an economy of scale of such CPUs of Intel or AMD lower the cost much more of those CPUs, so you become supportive and you Love Intel and AMD, and since you can become supportive of Intel or CPU on internet that is a place, so internet can play the role of like a virtual country, so i say that this being supportive or Loving Intel or AMD can create a kind of patriotism in form of a group of patriots of Intel or AMD." But i invite you to look at the following video about US vs China fight to control the world's most critical technology: US vs China: The Fight to Control the World's Most Critical Technology https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06Rrq51b1H0 And so that to know more , i invite you to read my following writing about innovation in China, and also i invite you to read my below thoughts about technology: More of my philosophy about innovation in China and more of my thoughts.. "However, despite successes in fintech and smart cities, China continues to struggle to innovate in key areas, particularly advanced computer chips and the expensive machines that make them. Despite the huge amount of capital (estimated to be upwards of $150 billion USD from 2014 through 2030) and resources that Beijing has poured into bolstering China's domestic semiconductor manufacturing capacity, many of the country's leading firms are struggling to realize the government's goals. After being added to the U.S. Department of Commerce's Entity List in 2020, China's most advanced chip foundry, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), has struggled to meet its goals. Despite promising to produce thin and modern 7-nanometer chips, SMIC lacks the machine tools to make them. U.S. export controls on chip design software and foundry machine tools have also crippled Huawei's HiSilicon, effectively curbing its only potential rival to U.S. advanced chips. To be sure, Beijing's reliance on imported technologies goes well beyond foreign-designed semiconductors. According to a 2018 article from the Ministry of Education, China relies on imports for 35 key technologies that it is unable to produce domestically in sufficient quality or quantity. These technologies include heavy-duty gas turbines, high-pressure piston pumps, steel for high-end bearings, photolithography machines, core industrial software, and more. With U.S.-China bilateral technology investment seeing a steep 96 percent decline since 2016, Beijing has been forced to look for new ways to source key technologies, turning to shell companies and intermediary agents to source foreign components, reagents, and other relevant equipment. In short, China has demonstrated its capacity to indigenously innovate, but this capacity has not yet proliferated across all key sectors. What initially began as a strategy to import and copy the technology and innovations of other nations has changed to reflect China's growing ability to take foreign ideas and concepts and mold them with respect to China's domestic requirements." Read more here: https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/beijings-re-innovation-strategy-is-key-element-of-u-s-china-competition/ More of my philosophy about the network topology of Intel Xeon and AMD Epyc and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, i have just looked at the network topology of AMD Epyc CPU, here it is: https://www.anandtech.com/show/11551/amds-future-in-servers-new-7000-series-cpus-launched-and-epyc-analysis/2 And i am carefully noticing in the above article that the network topology between the different CCX on the same die and between cores on the same CCX are connected with Infinity Fabric in a much sophisticated manner than a simple bus topology and i think it makes the AMD Eypc CPU good at "scalability" as is Intel Xeon, and i think that such CPUs are also efficiently minimizing the number of hops between sockets etc., it is why i think the number hops don't go higher than 2 and the latency of the two hops is not so problematic, so i think that it is a good news, since i think that AMD Epyc and Intel Xeon and the like are not using the following methodology in the following paper using filters so that to reduce bus traffic: I have just read the following interesting paper about Scaling SMP Machines Through Hierarchical Snooping, i invite you to read it: https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~kola/projectreports/cs757.pdf More of my philosophy about the network topology in multicores CPUs.. I invite you to look at the following video: Ring or Mesh, or other? AMD's Future on CPU Connectivity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8teWvMXK99I&t=904s And i invite you to read the following article: Does an AMD Chiplet Have a Core Count Limit? Read more here: https://www.anandtech.com/show/16930/does-an-amd-chiplet-have-a-core-count-limit I think i am smart and i say that the above video and the above article are not so smart, so i will talk about a very important thing, and it is the following, read the following: Performance Scalability of a Multi-core Web Server https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221046211_Performance_scalability_of_a_multi-core_web_server So notice carefully that it is saying the following: "..we determined that performance scaling was limited by the capacity of the address bus, which became saturated on all eight cores. If this key obstacle is addressed, commercial web server and systems software are well-positioned to scale to a large number of cores." So as you notice they were using an Intel Xeon of 8 cores, and the application was scalable to 8x but the hardware was not scalable to 8x, since it was scalable only to 4.8x, and this was caused by the bus saturation, since the Address bus saturation causes poor scaling, and the Address Bus carries requests and responses for data, called snoops, and more caches mean more sources and more destinations for snoops that is causing the poor scaling, so as you notice that a network topology of a Ring bus or a bus was not sufficient so that to scale to 8x on an Intel Xeon with 8 cores, so i think that the new architectures like Epyc CPU and Threadripper CPU can use a faster bus or/and a different network topology that permits to both ensure a full scalability locally in the same node and globally between the nodes, so then we can notice that a sophisticated mesh network topology not only permits to reduce the number of hops inside the CPU for good latency, but it is also good for reliability by using its sophisticated redundancy and it is faster than previous topologies like the ring bus or the bus since for example the search on address bus becomes parallelized, and it looks like the internet network that uses mesh topology using routers, so it parallelizes, and i also think that using a more sophisticated topology like a mesh network topology is related to queuing theory since we can notice that in operational research the mathematics says that we can make the queue like M/M/1 more efficient by making the server more powerful, but we can notice that the knee of a M/M/1 queue is around 50% , so we can notice that by using a mesh topology like internet or inside a CPU, you can by parallelizing more you can in operational research both enhance the knee of the queue and the speed of executing the transactions and it is like using many servers in queuing theory and it permits to scale better inside a CPU or in internet. More of my philosophy about silicon chip fabrication and technology and more of my thoughts.. The atoms used in silicon chip fabrication are around 0.2nm, so i think that we can make a transistor of one atom , you can read about it here: Scientists create new recipe for single-atom transistors https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/05/200511092920.htm So i think this gives an exponential growth of scalability with EUV(Extreme ultraviolet lithography) or such technology to around 2^5, and after that i think we can go to 3D or to the superconductor computer chips, read about them in my below thoughts, or use the following inventions, read about them carefully in my following writing and thoughts: More of my philosophy about latency and contention and concurrency and parallelism and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart and i have just posted, read it below, about the new two inventions that will make logic gates thousands of times faster or a million times faster than those in existing computers, and i think that there is still a problem with those new inventions, and it is about the latency and concurrency, since you need concurrency and you need preemptive or non-preemptive scheduling of the coroutines , so since the HBM is 106.7 ns in latency and the DDR4 is 73.3 ns in latency and the AMD 3D V-Cache has also almost the same cost in latency, so as you notice that this kind of latency is still costly , also there is a latency that is the Time slice that takes a coroutine to execute and it is costly in latency, since this kind of latency and Time slice is a waiting time that looks like the time wasted in a contention in parallelism, so by logical analogy this kind of latency and Time slice create like a contention like in parallelism that reduces scalability, so i think it is why those new inventions have this kind of limit or constraints in a "concurrency" envirenment. And i invite you to read my following smart thoughts about preemptive and non-preemptive timesharing: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/JuC4jar661w More of my philosophy about Fastest-ever logic gates and more of my thoughts.. "Logic gates are the fundamental building blocks of computers, and researchers at the University of Rochester have now developed the fastest ones ever created. By zapping graphene and gold with laser pulses, the new logic gates are a million times faster than those in existing computers, demonstrating the viability of "lightwave electronics.". If these kinds of lightwave electronic devices ever do make it to market, they could be millions of times faster than today's computers. Currently we measure processing speeds in Gigahertz (GHz), but these new logic gates function on the scale of Petahertz (PHz). Previous studies have set that as the absolute quantum limit of how fast light-based computer systems could possibly get." Read more here: https://newatlas.com/electronics/fastest-ever-logic-gates-computers-million-times-faster-petahertz/ Read my following news: And with the following new discovery computers and phones could run thousands of times faster.. Prof Alan Dalton in the School of Mathematical and Physics Sciences at the University of Sussex, said: "We're mechanically creating kinks in a layer of graphene. It's a bit like nano-origami. "Using these nanomaterials will make our computer chips smaller and faster. It is absolutely critical that this happens as computer manufacturers are now at the limit of what they can do with traditional semiconducting technology. Ultimately, this will make our computers and phones thousands of times faster in the future. "This kind of technology -- "straintronics" using nanomaterials as opposed to electronics -- allows space for more chips inside any device. Everything we want to do with computers -- to speed them up -- can be done by crinkling graphene like this." Dr Manoj Tripathi, Research Fellow in Nano-structured Materials at the University of Sussex and lead author on the paper, said: "Instead of having to add foreign materials into a device, we've shown we can create structures from graphene and other 2D materials simply by adding deliberate kinks into the structure. By making this sort of corrugation we can create a smart electronic component, like a transistor, or a logic gate." The development is a greener, more sustainable technology. Because no additional materials need to be added, and because this process works at room temperature rather than high temperature, it uses less energy to create. Read more here: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/02/210216100141.htm But I think that mass production of graphene still hasn't quite begun, so i think the inventions above of the Fastest-ever logic gates that uses graphene and of the one with nanomaterials that uses graphene will not be commercialized fully until perhaps around year 2035 or 2040 or so, so read the following so that to understand why: "Because large-scale mass production of graphene still hasn't quite begun , the market is a bit limited. However, that leaves a lot of room open for investors to get in before it reaches commercialization. The market was worth $78.7 million in 2019 and, according to Grand View Research, is expected to rise drastically to $1.08 billion by 2027. North America currently has the bulk of market share, but the Asia-Pacific area is expected to have the quickest growth in adoption of graphene uses in coming years. North America and Europe are also expected to have above-market average growth. The biggest driver of all this growth is expected to be the push for cleaner, more efficient energy sources and the global reduction of emissions in the air." Read more here: https://www.energyandcapital.com/report/the-worlds-next-rare-earth-metal/1600 More of my philosophy about superconductor computer chips and more of my thoughts.. "Scientists from the University of Virginia School of Medicine and collaborators used the building blocks of life to potentially revolutionize electronics. Edward H. Egelman, Ph.D. and his colleagues say their new DNA-enabled method could have a wide range of research applications in physics and materials science. Crucially, it could lead to the creation of Little's room-temperature superconductor, which could help revolutionize electronics. Their work, combined with other recent breakthroughs in superconductors, could unlock the great potential of quantum computing — which would, in turn, vastly improve countless scientific fields with its hyper-fast calculations." Read more here: https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/engineering-breakthrough-dna-quantum-computing So i think that superconductor computer chips will be possible in the future, and computer chips with superconducting circuits — circuits with zero electrical resistance — would be 50 to 100 times |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 12 09:04AM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy and more precision about virtual patriotism and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I say that internet is a "place" one can visit: Buildings of varying importance that are related to its facilitation and management are scattered all over the world, and are situated contrary to typical notions of a connected world. The internet connects cities, countries and continents via fiber-optic cables that follow the shortest path between two points. So internet is place, so i think it can play the role of like a virtual country, so i think that a narrow definition of patriotism is to say that it is about patriotism of a country, but i think that this narrow definition is not correct, since you have to understand the essence of patriotism, i mean that its fondamental characteristics are about the to Love and to support, and i think that its essence comes from when you understand that for example an american x86 CPU of AMD or Intel is so important for you and it is substantially beneficial for you, and since also an economy of scale of such CPUs of Intel or AMD lower the cost much more of those CPUs, so you become supportive and you Love Intel and AMD, and since you can become supportive of Intel or CPU on internet that is a place, so internet can play the role of like a virtual country, so i say that this being supportive or Loving Intel or AMD can create a kind of patriotism in form of a group of patriots of Intel or AMD. More of my philosophy about the essence of patriotism and more of my thoughts.. More of my philosophy about patriotism and about nationalism and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, i think that what is happening today is that we are becoming patriotism and not nationalism, since i think that a substantial economic interdependence between countries creates a an economic patriotism that we can call patriotism, so for example the substantial economic interdependence between Canada and USA and Mexico is creating an economic patriotism that we can call patriotism that is the union of the three countries, so i think that we have to change our view or conception of what is patriotism, since i think that for example south Korea and USA are substantially mutually economically dependent, and this creates a new kind of economic patriotism that we call patriotism, so it is no more about nationalism that is an archaism, but it is about patriotism, so notice that president Putin is trying to create a new kind of economic patriotism that we can call patriotism that unites his country and some other asian countries and with Iran and with Syria etc. so as you notice that this economic patriotism is not just about the patriotism of a zone such European union, but it is intercontinental. More of my philosophy about the essence of competition and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so as you are noticing i am smartly saying in my below thoughts of my philosophy that quality in an atheistic system comes from "competition", but i have to make you understand my smart thoughts more, so i am saying this way , since it is by logical analogy like the saying of Adam Smith of: "Human egoism is the engine of the prosperity and happiness of nations", i mean that you have to see the smart pattern as a logical analogy of my thoughts, since i say that competition starts in the first step as a individual competition in a fight for life, but competition is created by egoism, but egoism and competition becomes in the following steps, by necessity , collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity in a society, so you have to read my below smart thoughts of my philosophy so that you understand my views: More of my philosophy about the trustworthy relationship and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that trust between people is still an important thing, since most of us are not rich and/or powerful, so we are still interdependent on each other, so we have to develop a trustworthy relationship so that so it be helpful for us, other than that, the being good professionalism also build a trustworthy relationship, and as i have also said that the good vibes also attract customers and fans, so you have not to be negligent or neglectful about it, other than that i can also ask another philosophical question of: Are humans peaceful or violent ? I think in the old world, i think people were much more egoistic than today, since as i have just said that i think that individual morality comes from the individual interest, but being individual interest is not societal morality or general or global morality, so then societal morality comes from the societal interest, so since the old world was much less advanced than the today world, so then the societal interest was much less strong than today, so since survival was so difficult for humans, so then it is why i say that the old world was so much violent, but i think today people are much less violent since our today world is much more advanced than the old world, and we are exponentially progressing, so i say that we have to be optimistic about our today world. And about the saying of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith of: "Human egoism is the engine of the prosperity and happiness of nations", here is what i just said about it: More of my philosophy about competition and about quality and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart, i think that quality in an atheistic system comes from "competition", so then so that to be quality , competition is first and foremost the will to fight, since even America's military argues that "will to fight" is the disposition and decision to fight, act, or persevere, and notice that this will to fight is a cause of quality that precedes the good smartness or good education as causes of quality, and i think that competition is also the acts of competition of the acts of being good smartness or/and the acts of being good wisdom and such , so then what we have to be is to be competition that brings the right quality, so then you have to be for example a competition in a fight for life, and you have to be economic competition of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and i invite you to read again the following interesting article that proves that humans are naturally and individually selfish and egoistic: https://thebaynet.com/humans-are-naturally-selfish-study-finds-html/ So as you notice on the above interesting article about a study, that humans are naturally selfish and egoistic since it is like a game of "competition" where you have to get a big profit, but i think that i am highly smart and i say that the seeking the big profit by being competition is also regulated by antitrust laws, and individual self-interest and egoism creates competition and by the mechanism of competition we become self-interest and egoism of a group and of a society or of a zone such as the European union and then we become collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity in a society or in a zone such as the European union or in global world and that creates prosperity and happiness of nations, and also we have to say that when we get a big profit we can also help the others by being solidarity, so then we have not to be pessimistic about humans that are naturally and individually selfish and egoistic, but we have to be patience since it takes some time so that this individual self-interest and egoism becomes collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity as i am explaining it, and of course we have to be much more optimistic since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital and we have to be much more optimistic since self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, as has said it Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and notice that we have to look at competition from a broader point of view since competition is also competition inside a Democracy that fights efficiently corruption by using different political parties and different political groups inside the congress etc. and competition that fights efficiently corruption is also the separation of powers in USA, since the U.S. constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so i think that for example USA is much less corrupt than African countries or such countries since they lack this kind of "competition" that balances this way the powers. And i invite you to read my previous thoughts of my philosophy that i have thought and written quickly in the following web link: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KU5LvfaA_rY Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment