| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 08 05:47PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about how to create in new type of man and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i think that it is possible to create a kind of new sophisticated type of human or man, so i think i have just explained in my below thoughts of my philosophy how to be hope and how to be a positive energy, but i think one of the most important thing is to ask a the following philosophical question: What is the mechanisms that make a human be efficient at adaptation and perfection ? So i think that i have also just talked in my below thoughts of my philosophy about the first mechanism that is that when you become more and more perfect, you begin to notice that human life becomes more and more easy for you, since for example when you become more and more educated , you become more and more smart, so then for example the "reusability" of this smartness makes human life more easy for you, but not only that, but the second mechanism is that we have to organize knowledge and information such as on internet in such way that it becomes easy to find the efficient and high quality knowledge and information, so then you have to be "selective" in such way of your knowledge and information so that to be efficient. And of course i have also just said that this becoming more and more smart and more and more selective can hurt and can hurt business, and here is what i have just said about it: More of my philosophy about the radical form of governance and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and as you have just noticed i have just talked about the Volksgemeinschaft and about neo-Nazism, read it below, and as you have noticed i have just talked about the radical form of governance where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), so this way of governance has not worked, but today the way of governance has changed and i think that it is proceeding by the way of introducing appropriate, rational reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments and by monitoring with statistics, other than that there is also another radical form of governance that says that we have to be the radical form of class struggle as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but i think that this way of doing has not worked since this radical way of class struggle renders people too much hateful(filled with hatred), since in this radical form of Class Struggle, the lower classes in the society hate the upper classes and the upper classes hate the lower classes, so this kind of radical form of Class Struggle doesn't work and it is not good for business, since i say that in business we have even to be disciplined at buying a product or service even if we don't love them, since for example i can say that when you become more and more educated, so then you become more and more smart, so then you become more and more "selective" of products and of services and of humans and this can hurt and this can hurt business, so then i think that the solution of this problem is for example to become disciplined at buying a product or service even if you don't love them, and of course you are noticing that we have to make people aware of it by educating them correctly. And here is what i say more about Class struggle: And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism, so i will first ask a philosophical question of: Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ? I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism, since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions. More of my philosophy about thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism and about competition and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism of marxism and communism, is by logical analogy like the process of competition between ideas or between people that brings quality, so you can have a "synthesis" of private property and socialism understood as thesis and antithesis, and you can have collision of the bourgeoisie and the working class as competing thesis and antithesis that can bring a synthesis as quality, so i think that marxism and communism say that the bourgeoisie of the capitalistic system is not capable of treating correctly the working class, and i think it is from where comes marxism, but i think that this way of thinking is too extremist in our today world , since i have just for example said that workers living standards depend on wage levels, not wage ratios, eventhough when measuring wage dispersion, economists frequently look at the 90/50 ratio, so i think that we have not to be pessimistic about the living standards that has brought capitalism, and you can read all my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice it: More of my philosophy about the Volksgemeinschaft and about neo-Nazism and more of my thoughts.. And read the following article so that you understand more: Germany seeks ban on neo-Nazis https://wc.arizona.edu/papers/94/58/01_96_m.html And I invite you to read the following article from a white supremacist and neo-nazi website called national vanguard: https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/04/cosmotheism-in-savitri-devi-2/ And notice that it is saying the following about national socialism of the white supremacism and neo-nazism: "[National Socialism] aimed at stemming the physical and moral decay of modern, technically "advanced" humanity by forcing it — by forcing its racial élite, at least — to live in accordance with the ultimate purpose of Nature, which is not to make individuals "happy," nor even to make, nations "happy," but to evolve supermankind — living godhead — out of the existing master races, first of all, out of the pure Aryan. Happiness is a bourgeois conception, definitely. It is not our concern. We want animals to be happy — and inferior men, also, to the extent their happiness does not disturb the New Order. We believe higher mankind has better things to do. The Aryan world, remoulded by us after our final triumph, will no longer think in terms of happiness like the decadent world of today. It will think in terms of duty — like the early Vedic world, the early Christian world, the early Islamic world; like the world at the time of any great new beginning." But i think i am smart and i say that there is two weaknesses in the above thoughts of neo-nazism, first weakness is that neo-nazism wants to be dictatorship so that to use the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but this way of doing has not worked, and the second weakness is that the "duty" in the above thoughts of neo-nazism is idealized, but since the duty has to be dictated by the dictatorship of neo-nazism, so since it is not the democratic way, then the duty that is dictated by neo-nazism can not work correctly and it can become a big problem since it comes from the dictatorship of neo-nazism. I think i am smart, and i have just spoken yesterday about neo-Nazism and i have just said that what also they want to do is to be a dictatorship so that to use the radical form that has not worked, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), and here is more logical proof about the way of Social Engineering of Nazism and how the Nazism or neo-Nazism define who belongs to the National Socialist 'community' and who does not, read the following: https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689590.001.0001/acprof-9780199689590 Other than that , i think you can live to 100 years if you take Metformin, and here is the logical proof of it: With reference to observed survival in diabetic patients initiated with metformin monotherapy [survival time ratio (STR) = 1.0], adjusted median survival time was 15% lower (STR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.90) in matched individuals without diabetes and 38% lower (0.62, 0.58-0.66) in diabetic patients treated with sulphonylurea monotherapy. Read more here on the following study so that to notice it: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25041462/ More of my philosophy about the stock price and about bitcoin and more of my thoughts.. Microsoft stock price stood in year 2022 at $268.09 According to the latest long-term forecast, Microsoft price will hit $300 by the end of 2022 and then $400 by the middle of 2025. Microsoft will rise to $500 within the year of 2026, $600 in 2027, $700 in 2028, $800 in 2031 and $900 in 2033. Read more here: Microsoft Stock Forecast 2022 - 2025 - 2030 https://coinpriceforecast.com/msft#:~:text=Microsoft%20stock%20price%20stood%20at,2031%20and%20%24900%20in%202033. I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i think that my below thoughts about investments in stocks is valid, since look at the above example at the Microsoft stock prices above, the first thing to notice is that it is just a forecast, but as i am saying below that it is too risky, since you have to diversify your investment by for example investing in index funds as i am explaining it below, and second important thing to notice is that the stock price is the current price that a share of stock is trading for on the market , but it looks by analogy like the bitcoin currency, since it also follows demand and supply, but i think that investing in the stocks is better than investing in bitcoin, since there is a return of investment in stocks that also permits you to sell much easily your shares of stock, and i think that this return of investment doesn't exist in bitcoin, also i think bitcoin has still much lesser value. Here is my new proverb: "When you see a giant killer wave coming to swallow you, you have not to waste your time at being pessimistic, but i think you have to know how to beautifully swim so that to survive the giant killer wave. And i think it is my kind of spirit, and notice that it is by logical analogy like my way of being the good vibes that i am talking about below, even if our world is too much pessimistic." More of my philosophy about the good vibes and about Love and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. How can we Love when we are no more innocence ? and when we are no more adolescence ? so i think that there is still a beautiful "kind" of Love and it is a kind of Love that comes from the good vibes, and i think that the good vibes also come from a wise spirit, and take for example a look at my following poems that i have invented quickly, and i think that you have to notice the good vibes in them, since i think that i am both showing my good vibes in form of my poems of Love and i am also showing my wise kind of spirit in form of my other poems, and this kind of wise spirit of mine is also like the good vibes of like being good professionalism, and i think that the good vibes also make the good fans (i mean the when you are fan of someone) and attracts customers in business, and it is my way of doing in business, and notice that those good vibes are a first step to a trustworthy relationship, since i can also say that you cannot love without trusting a person. Since i think that trust is the building block of love. Just like how a child trusts her mother and thereby loves her, your partner needs to know that you are trustworthy and won't ditch them in difficult times. This feeling is important for love to sprout and flourish. Trust is also very important for Business Relations in the Arab World, so i invite you to read the following interesting article from the Arab world about it: Al-Ississ: Trust is at the Heart of Business Relations in the Arab World https://www.aucegypt.edu/news/stories/al-ississ-trust-heart-business-relations-arab-world So i invite you to look at my following poems in english and french in the following web link so that to notice my good vibes in them: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/NOpq_uc2gOg More of my philosophy about being a seller of Amazon products and more of my thoughts.. I have just said the following: "I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, I have quickly taken a look at Amazon profit margin and ROI(Return of investment), and i think by being a sellers of Amazon(or the like) products you can become rich, since you can buy in more quantity so that to lower the price of an Item of Amazon, so it is better for you if you have more money when you start selling Amazon products, and after that i think that you can use Amazon shipment strategy that easy the things for you, and after you make much more money by being |
| Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com>: Sep 08 04:28PM -0700 Hello, More of my philosophy about energy efficiency of quantum computers and about IBM's Compute-in-memory and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I think i am smart, and i will say that IBM have invented the following Compute-in-memory specialized hardware that works in both analogue and digital so that to lower much more energy consumption, read about it here: IBM: Compute-in-memory beats GPUs by 10x, sometimes https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/research-news/ibm-compute-memory-beats-gpus-10x-sometimes-2021-11/ But i think that the much better solution than the above Compute-in-memory specialized hardware of IBM is to use the powerful quantum computers, and i invite you so that to read the following article about it: Quantum computers vastly outperform supercomputers when it comes to energy efficiency https://physicsworld.com/a/quantum-computers-vastly-outperform-supercomputers-when-it-comes-to-energy-efficiency/ Also i have just looked at the following article about the benchmark of Intel Xeon Scalable Processor vs. Nvidia V100 GPU, here it is: https://www.xcelerit.com/computing-benchmarks/insights/benchmarks-intel-xeon-scalable-processor-vs-nvidia-v100-gpu/ So i think that the main problem of Intel Xeons in the above benchmark is the memory bandwidth, so i think that the number of GFLOPs of Intel Xeons in the above benchmark is a result of multiplying the frequency of the CPU by the number of cores and by 2x8FMA, i mean fused multiply–add (FMA) instructions for floating-point scalar and SIMD operations, and it is giving a result of 2,240 GFLOPs, so then if you want to have a powerful computer that also have a good memory bandwidth, i advice you to use a new two socket for new Intel Xeon processors that support a memory bandwidth of like 5.2 GT/s for DDR5 x 8 bytes per channel x 12 channels for one socket, and that equals 499.2 GB per second or 998.4 GB per second for two sockets, and this will equal the memory bandwidth of the Nvidia V100 PCIe (Volta) in the above benchmark , and this will solve the memory bandwidth problem, and of course the two socket motherboard for a two new 64 cores Intel Xeon 3.4 Ghz will give you around 6963 GFLOPs as the Nvidia V100 PCIe (Volta). And i invite you so that to read my following thoughts about AVX-512 of AMD Zen 4, since i have just brought a little more precision to it: More of my philosophy about AVX-512 of AMD Zen 4 architecture and more of my thoughts.. I think AVX-512 of AMD Zen 4 architecture will not be a true, 512-bit wide SIMD as we find in Intel architecture, but Zen 4 will be executing these AVX-512 instructions over two cycles, so i think it will not require to lower the frequency of the cores when using AVX-512, as is doing it Intel, and i think that AMD is doing it this way for also "compatibility" with the Intel AVX-512, and you can read the following article so that to notice it: https://www.anandtech.com/show/17552/amd-details-ryzen-7000-launch-up-ryzen-7950x-coming-sept-27 More of my philosophy about directory-based coherence or hierarchical bus coherence and more of my thoughts.. I have just read the following interesting paper about Scaling SMP Machines Through Hierarchical Snooping, i invite you to read it: https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~kola/projectreports/cs757.pdf So i think that AMD and Intel, so that to scale SMP machines, are using two methods, so i think that they are for example using a bus topology inside a 8 cores CCX as NUMA node in for example AMD multicore machines, but they are using filters so that to reduce much more bus traffic, like in the above paper, and i think they are not using a full mesh topology between NUMA nodes, but they are using a much more efficient topology than that of a bus or ring, so i think they are using a kind of routing between NUMA nodes (after the address of the destination is discovered) so that to be efficient, so i think it is why 32 cores or 64 cores or 128 cores x86 machines are scaling well, and read my following thoughts about the network topology of multicores CPUs: More of my philosophy about the network topology in multicores CPUs.. I invite you to look at the following video: Ring or Mesh, or other? AMD's Future on CPU Connectivity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8teWvMXK99I&t=904s And i invite you to read the following article: Does an AMD Chiplet Have a Core Count Limit? Read more here: https://www.anandtech.com/show/16930/does-an-amd-chiplet-have-a-core-count-limit I think i am smart and i say that the above video and the above article are not so smart, so i will talk about a very important thing, and it is the following, read the following: Performance Scalability of a Multi-core Web Server https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221046211_Performance_scalability_of_a_multi-core_web_server So notice carefully that it is saying the following: "..we determined that performance scaling was limited by the capacity of the address bus, which became saturated on all eight cores. If this key obstacle is addressed, commercial web server and systems software are well-positioned to scale to a large number of cores." So as you notice they were using an Intel Xeon of 8 cores, and the application was scalable to 8x but the hardware was not scalable to 8x, since it was scalable only to 4.8x, and this was caused by the bus saturation, since the Address bus saturation causes poor scaling, and the Address Bus carries requests and responses for data, called snoops, and more caches mean more sources and more destinations for snoops that is causing the poor scaling, so as you notice that a network topology of a Ring bus or a bus was not sufficient so that to scale to 8x on an Intel Xeon with 8 cores, so i think that the new architectures like Epyc CPU and Threadripper CPU can use a faster bus or/and a different network topology that permits to both ensure a full scalability locally in the same node and globally between the nodes, so then we can notice that a sophisticated mesh network topology not only permits to reduce the number of hops inside the CPU for good latency, but it is also good for reliability by using its sophisticated redundancy and it is faster than previous topologies like the ring bus or the bus since for example the search on address bus becomes parallelized, and it looks like the internet network that uses mesh topology using routers, so it parallelizes, and i also think that using a more sophisticated topology like a mesh network topology is related to queuing theory since we can notice that in operational research the mathematics says that we can make the queue like M/M/1 more efficient by making the server more powerful, but we can notice that the knee of a M/M/1 queue is around 50% , so we can notice that by using a mesh topology like internet or inside a CPU, you can by parallelizing more you can in operational research both enhance the knee of the queue and the speed of executing the transactions and it is like using many servers in queuing theory and it permits to scale better inside a CPU or in internet. More of my philosophy about RISC-V and about open source and more of my thoughts.. I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms.. I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it: RISC-V Chips Revolution is coming https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irH5eKzezsE But I don't think RISC-V is a good thing, since read the following about the open source problems: "RISC-V is open source, and open-source hardware centers on a design everybody is free to use and modify as they see fit. For its part, ARM claims that it has much more money to fund R&D and develop technology for its customers, whereas RISC-V International does not and merely provides an ISA. ARM also raised concerns that usage of RISC-V could result in "fragmentation," which is basically a lack of standards throughout an industry that creates an obstacle for compatibility in both hardware and software. Since ARM provides standardized cores, the risk of fragmentation is averted. Whereas RISC-V sees this standardization as a weakness, ARM argues it's a strength." Read more here: ARM vs. RISC-V: Is one better than the other? https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/arm-vs-risc-v/ And more of my writing about open source: "Software developers today have their own supply chains. Instead of assembling car parts, they assemble code by patching together existing open source components with their unique code. While this leads to increased productivity and innovation, it has also created significant security issues," said Matt Jarvis, Director of Developer Relations at Snyk. Read more here (and you have to translate the article because it is in french): DARPA is concerned about the reliability of open source code, it runs on every computer on the planet and keeps critical infrastructure running, According to NSA's Dave Aitel Read more here: https://securite.developpez.com/actu/335029/La-DARPA-s-inquiete-de-la-fiabilite-du-code-open-source-il-fonctionne-sur-tous-les-ordinateurs-de-la-planete-et-assure-le-fonctionnement-des-infrastructures-critiques-selon-Dave-Aitel-de-la-NSA/ More of my philosophy about Intel and about its future and more of my thoughts.. I think Intel and AMD are not the same, since notice how Intel has not used TSMC semiconductor manufacturing process so that to solve its problem, since i think that Intel is one of the "important" basis fondation of USA, since it is a semiconductor manufacturer as TSMC(Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company), so for US security reasons, Intel has to be successful, and it is why i think that Intel will soon be really successful in the CPUs and semiconductor sector, since Intel 4, the Intel implementation of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography, will be manufacturing-ready in the second half of 2022. It delivers an approximate 20% increase in transistor performance per watt. And Intel 3, with additional features, will deliver a further 18% performance per watt and will be manufacturing-ready in the second half of 2023. Ushering in the Angstrom Era with RibbonFET and PowerVia, Intel 20A will deliver up to a 15% performance per watt improvement and will be manufacturing-ready in the first half of 2024. Intel 18A will deliver an additional 10% improvement and will be manufacturing-ready in the second half of 2024, and read carefully the following interesting article so that to understand more how Intel will be soon really successful: https://min.news/en/tech/531c80fc9093694ee8a7eb7db7ac1dc2.html More of my philosophy about innovation in China and more of my thoughts.. "However, despite successes in fintech and smart cities, China continues to struggle to innovate in key areas, particularly advanced computer chips and the expensive machines that make them. Despite the huge amount of capital (estimated to be upwards of $150 billion USD from 2014 through 2030) and resources that Beijing has poured into bolstering China's domestic semiconductor manufacturing capacity, many of the country's leading firms are struggling to realize the government's goals. After being added to the U.S. Department of Commerce's Entity List in 2020, China's most advanced chip foundry, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), has struggled to meet its goals. Despite promising to produce thin and modern 7-nanometer chips, SMIC lacks the machine tools to make them. U.S. export controls on chip design software and foundry machine tools have also crippled Huawei's HiSilicon, effectively curbing its only potential rival to U.S. advanced chips. To be sure, Beijing's reliance on imported technologies goes well beyond foreign-designed semiconductors. According to a 2018 article from the Ministry of Education, China relies on imports for 35 key technologies that it is unable to produce domestically in sufficient quality or quantity. These technologies include heavy-duty gas turbines, high-pressure piston pumps, steel for high-end bearings, photolithography machines, core industrial software, and more. With U.S.-China bilateral technology investment seeing a steep 96 percent decline since 2016, Beijing has been forced to look for new ways to source key technologies, turning to shell companies and intermediary agents to source foreign components, reagents, and other relevant equipment. In short, China has demonstrated its capacity to indigenously innovate, but this capacity has not yet proliferated across all key sectors. What initially began as a strategy to import and copy the technology and innovations of other nations has changed to reflect China's growing ability to take foreign ideas and concepts and mold them with respect to China's domestic requirements." Read more here: https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/beijings-re-innovation-strategy-is-key-element-of-u-s-china-competition/ More of my philosophy about Random Write in Solid State Drives and more of my thoughts.. I have just read the following paper , so i invite you to read it carefully: SFS: Random Write Considered Harmful in Solid State Drives Read more here: https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast12/sfs-random-write-considered-harmful-solid-state-drives#:~:text=However%2C%20the%20random%20write%20performance,NAND%20block%20erases%20per%20write. But i don't agree with the above paper, since i invite you to look at the following article: SupremeRAID SR-1010 : 110 Go/s en lecture et 22 Go/s en écriture https://www.tomshardware.fr/supremeraid-sr-1010-110-go-s-en-lecture-et-22-go-s-en-ecriture/ So as you notice in the table in the above article, it says that the random write in RAID 10 of 4k in Linux is: 6 M IOPS so it gives around 25 GB/s throughput with Solid State Drives, and i think that it is a decent performance compared to the sequential write throughput, so i think that it is not so problematic as saying it the above paper. More of my philosophy about superconductor computer chips and more of my thoughts.. "Scientists from the University of Virginia School of Medicine and collaborators used the building blocks of life to potentially revolutionize electronics. Edward H. Egelman, Ph.D. and his colleagues say their new DNA-enabled method could have a wide range of research applications in physics and materials science. Crucially, it could lead to the creation of Little's room-temperature superconductor, which could help revolutionize electronics. Their work, combined with other recent breakthroughs in superconductors, could unlock the great potential of quantum computing — which would, in turn, vastly improve countless scientific fields with its hyper-fast calculations." Read more here: https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/engineering-breakthrough-dna-quantum-computing So i think that superconductor computer chips will be possible in the future, and computer chips with superconducting circuits — circuits with zero electrical resistance — would be 50 to 100 times as energy-efficient as today's chips, an attractive trait given the increasing power consumption of the massive data centers that power the Internet's most popular sites. And superconducting chips also promise greater processing power: Superconducting circuits have been clocked at a Terahertz. More of my philosophy about Rust and about memory models and about technology and more of my thoughts.. I think i am highly smart, and i say that the new programming language that we |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment