Wednesday, February 4, 2015

Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 5 topics

ghada glissa <ghadaglissa@gmail.com>: Feb 04 07:49AM -0800

Dear all,
 
I'm trying to use memcpy to get some kind of information copied into a buffer. My problem is that the order of the copied bytes seems to be inverted from the original order.
 
exp:
 
long unsigned int address=0xacde480000000001;
uint8_t *nonce;
memcpy(nonce,&address,8);
 
return the nonce value is : 1000048deac
 
So is the there any solution to keep the same order.
 
Regards.
Christopher Pisz <nospam@notanaddress.com>: Feb 04 10:13AM -0600

On 2/4/2015 9:49 AM, ghada glissa wrote:
 
> return the nonce value is : 1000048deac
 
> So is the there any solution to keep the same order.
 
> Regards.
 
Where in the code are you getting "the value of nonce?" and how do you
know it is reversed?
 
What is a uint8_t and what's wrong with unsigned int?
 
I get an access violation when running your listing and rightfully so,
nothing has been allocated anywhere, much less memory at 0xacde480000000001.
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Feb 04 04:15PM

>memcpy(nonce,&address,8);
 
>return the nonce value is : 1000048deac
 
>So is the there any solution to keep the same order.
 
use a MIPS (big endian) processor.
Christopher Pisz <nospam@notanaddress.com>: Feb 04 10:17AM -0600

On 2/4/2015 10:13 AM, Christopher Pisz wrote:
> What is a uint8_t and what's wrong with unsigned int?
 
Correction: What is wrong with unsigned long long?
See how confusing your silly typedefs are? Use the primitives C++ gave you.
Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid>: Feb 04 11:30AM -0500

On 2/4/2015 10:49 AM, ghada glissa wrote:
> I'm trying to use memcpy to get some kind of information copied into
> a
buffer. My problem is that the order of the copied bytes seems to be
inverted from the original order.
 
> long unsigned int address=0xacde480000000001;
> uint8_t *nonce;
> memcpy(nonce,&address,8);
 
Uh... Did you actually allocate the memory before copying to it? I
recommend using
 
uint8_t nonce[sizeof(address)];
 
and instead of copying exactly 8, also use 'sizeof(address)'.
 
 
> return the nonce value is : 1000048deac
 
> So is the there any solution to keep the same order.
 
It does. You probably don't understand how the 'address' is organized.
 
V
--
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Feb 04 06:10PM

On 04/02/2015 16:17, Christopher Pisz wrote:
>> What is a uint8_t and what's wrong with unsigned int?
 
> Correction: What is wrong with unsigned long long?
> See how confusing your silly typedefs are? Use the primitives C++ gave you.
 
The only typedef I can see is uint8_t which *is* part of C++ and is
*not* "silly".
 
I use typedefs *a lot* in my code and as long as the names are carefully
chosen the resultant code is actually *less* confusing.
 
/Flibble
ghada glissa <ghadaglissa@gmail.com>: Feb 04 11:27AM -0800

I did :

long unsigned int address=0xacde480000000001;
uint8_t *nonce;
nonce= new uint8_t;
memcpy(nonce,&address,8);
 
for(int i=0;i<16;i++){

printf("%x",nonce[i]);
}
 
and i got as a result: 1000048deac
 
}
Vlad from Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru>: Feb 04 11:35AM -0800

This statement
 
nonce= new uint8_t;
 
allocates only pne byte. So nonce can not accomodate an object of type long insigned.
 
 
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 10:28:16 PM UTC+3, ghada glissa wrote:
Vlad from Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru>: Feb 04 11:38AM -0800

Though it is not necessary that there will be access violation because usually the minimum number of bytes that are allocated by default are equal to 16.:)
 
Also it seems that the LSB is stored at the start address. You could reverse the array o=if you want to see an equivalent representation of the number when the array is outputed.
 
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 10:35:29 PM UTC+3, Vlad from Moscow wrote:
Christopher Pisz <nospam@notanaddress.com>: Feb 04 01:50PM -0600

On 2/4/2015 12:10 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
 
> I use typedefs *a lot* in my code and as long as the names are carefully
> chosen the resultant code is actually *less* confusing.
 
> /Flibble
 
friend functions are also part of C++, but that doesn't mean you need to
make every function you ever create a friend. It is a blatant misuse in
modern C++ programming carried over from ancient times.
 
Calling everything a uint8_t rather than an unsigned long long
accomplishes what in 2015?!
 
Are you going to change it to be a float later? Then it wouldn't make
much sense anymore to have a uint8_t m_foo that is actually a float
would it?
 
Is it because you want to remind yourself that an unsigned long long is
8 bytes? Is it guaranteed to be 8 bytes by the standard anyway?
 
So, ok you want to be able to compile your source somewhere where a
unsigned long long is no longer 8 bytes. You're gonna change your
typedef and hope and pray someone never assigned a uint8_t to something
else that counted on it being an unsigned long long?! Thanks for wasting
6 months worth of man hours!
 
What in the nine hells does calling and int int4_t accomplish?
 
Having had to debug projects where silly authors made 5000 line header
files to rename every fricken type in the langauge, seeing a typedef
like that makes me vomit.
Christopher Pisz <nospam@notanaddress.com>: Feb 04 02:03PM -0600

On 2/4/2015 1:27 PM, ghada glissa wrote:
> }
 
> and i got as a result: 1000048deac
 
> }
 
 
 
Again, please post complete compilable minimal _and consistent_ examples.
 
Why are you using long unsigned int, uint8_t * from C99 stdint.h, and int?
 
Use C++ primitive types, go read about each type, read about big endian
and little endian, and try again.
Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com>: Feb 04 12:14PM -0800

On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:49:17 -0800 (PST), ghada glissa
>memcpy(nonce,&address,8);
 
>return the nonce value is : 1000048deac
 
>So is the there any solution to keep the same order.
 
You are laboring under a false assumption. Just because your source
statement has the bytes listed in a certain order does not mean that
the data is stored in memory in that order.
 
In your source code, reading from left to right, you start with the
most significant byte and proceed to the least significant. This is
the way PEOPLE read hexadecimal values.
 
On a little endian computer (as most desktop systems are), the MACHINE
stores bytes with the least significant one in the lower address and
proceed to the most significant byte in the higher address. If you
had examined the contents of the variable address, you would have seen
that the bytes are in the same order as the memory pointed to by
nonce.
 
And the data pointed to by nonce should be 8 bytes long, not the 5-1/2
you show. You are missing five nybbles of 0.
 
--
Remove del for email
jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring): Feb 04 08:15PM


> long unsigned int address=0xacde480000000001;
> uint8_t *nonce;
> nonce= new uint8_t;
 
As already has been pointer out this isn't enough memory
for holding a long unsigned int, you're writing past the
end of the memory you allocated.
 
Use instead
 
uint8_t * nonce = new uint_t[ sizesof address ];
 
 
> printf("%x",nonce[i]);
> }
 
> and i got as a result: 1000048deac
 
Obviously, you're using a "little-endian" system. On such
systems the least-significant byte is stored in the lowest
memort address and the most significant byte at the highest
address. Thus the number you store in the 'address' variable
will appear in memory like this
 
01 00 00 00 00 48 de ac
 
with memory addresses increasing from left to right. And
that's exactly what you get printed out since you print
out the value stored in the lowest memory address first
and the one in the highest last. You'd get the same ef-
fect if you did e.g
 
uint8_t * nonce = reinterpret_cast< int8_t >( &address );
 
i.e. if you made point 'nonce' to the location of 'address'
without any copying. Thus memcpy() plays no role in this.
 
There' also a problem with the code for printing out the
bytes in 'nonce': by using '%x' you will only get a single
'0' for a byte with value 0, thus making the result look
wrong (you get only 4 '0' in a row where there should be 8).
Use instead
 
printf( "%02x", nonce[ i ] );
 
The "%02x" tells the printf() function to always print
out two (hexadecimal) digits and "fill up" those two
characters with '0' if the value is less than 0x10.
 
There are also systems which store values the other way
round, "big-endian" systems. That's why you shouldn't
write out binary data into a file when you want to be
able to read that file also on other systems (well, un-
less you also store somewhere what endian-ness was used
for writing the data - other possible issues like different
sizes for int etc. also need to be addressed) or why there
is a "network order" (big-endian) for transfering binary
(integer) data over the net.
Regards, Jens
--
\ Jens Thoms Toerring ___ jt@toerring.de
\__________________________ http://toerring.de
Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com>: Feb 04 02:33PM -0600

On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:50:47 -0600, Christopher Pisz
 
>Having had to debug projects where silly authors made 5000 line header
>files to rename every fricken type in the langauge, seeing a typedef
>like that makes me vomit.
 
 
 
Eh? unit8_t is an exact 8-bit, unsigned, 2's complement, type. Or an
unsigned char in most implementations. stdint.h has been defined for
quite a while now, although I think its presence in the C++ standard
is rather newer (although support has been pretty universal).
 
Whether it's an appropriate type to use in this instance is a
different question, although the (limited) context does not make it
unreasonable (it appears to be something that's headed out to the
network, and an array of exact 8-bit bytes seems a reasonable
requirement). Although it's probably unlikely that the OP actually
understands the issue well enough to have picked uint8_t for a good
reason.
ghada glissa <ghadaglissa@gmail.com>: Feb 04 01:28PM -0800

> sizes for int etc. also need to be addressed) or why there
> is a "network order" (big-endian) for transfering binary
> (integer) data over the net.
 
Thank you Mr Jend for your help, i used printf( "%02x", nonce[ i ] ) and it improve the display of values less than 0x10,i get this result 010000000048deac but i can't resolve the problem of order with memcpy.
 
Regards.
Christopher Pisz <nospam@notanaddress.com>: Feb 04 03:31PM -0600

On 2/4/2015 2:33 PM, Robert Wessel wrote:
> unsigned char in most implementations. stdint.h has been defined for
> quite a while now, although I think its presence in the C++ standard
> is rather newer (although support has been pretty universal).
 
It is a relic from C99. It is also not guaranteed to exist. It even says so.
 
Support is not universal at all.
Try to compile that listing on Visual Studio 2003-2008 for example.
Being part of C and not C++ Microsoft also deemed it a relic and dropped
it. Later they brought it back. Granted MS loves to make their own rules.
 
What traditionally happens is an old C programmer comes along on a C++
project somewhere between 2003 and 2008 and adds 5000 lines of his own
typedefs recreating this header, because he is just used to it being
there. Then some other programmer comes along and directly or indirectly
assigns some typdefed type to another type that is not typedefed, 8
years later someone decided to change a type being used somewhere,
because they were typedefed anyway, and bam! Welcome to 6 months of
monotonous type domino fixing.
 
If you want to use a unsigned int then use an unsigned int. There is no
purpose at all to use a typedefed renaming when you intend on it being
an specific type anyway. If you want to know the size, then use sizeof.
If the size doesn't match, because Joe Blow created
MyNonExistantOSThatWillNeverExist, then throw an exception and deal with
it when you make a project wide decision to support Joe's new OS.
Otherwise, be a realist and know that you are targeting Windows, Linux,
OSX, Android, or just one of the above.
 
stdint.h was a feeble attempt at cross-platform guarentees that aren't
guarentees at all and the idea is a source of bugs time and again.
 
Worse, I see a project that has in _black and white_ in its requirements
that its sole target is Windows and will always be Windows, yet some C
guy comes along and decides it is a great idea to make a typedef for
every single type in the language. Which is ridiculous. Then a Windows
CLR/.NET/whatever else, trained guy comes along and uses all the Windows
types, then a real C++ guy comes along and has a hissy fit much like I
am having.
 
I don't want to see or maintain uint8_t a = std::wstring(((wchar
*)__bstr_t_("text")))[0];
 
It's presence in C++ is only because C++ supports worthless error prone
relics from C that have no business being put into _new_ code, but are
only there to keep legacy code working....and even then, I bet you have
a related debugging session it its future.
 
When you start counting on types being of a certain size without
checking sizeof, and start shuffling bits or bytes around, you are
asking for trouble.
 
 
> unreasonable (it appears to be something that's headed out to the
> network, and an array of exact 8-bit bytes seems a reasonable
> requirement).
 
If your target platform doesn't specifically guarantee it for you, which
it usually does. Then I'd still rather see:
 
if( sizeof(unsigned char) != 1 )
{
// Throw your favorite exception here
throw std::exception("Expected one byte unsigned char. Unsupported
OS or compiler options.");
}
 
// carry on using unsigned char for your project
// without modern programmers having to sort through your 5000 typedefs.
 
and you only need to do that on types where you are doing some kind of
manipulation of bits or bytes, which hopefully, you rarely need do
anyway in the modern day.
 
People who grab a byte of some other type or bitmask or count on bitwise
operators just cause, pee me off. There had better be a specific and
reason for it.
 
> Although it's probably unlikely that the OP actually
> understands the issue well enough to have picked uint8_t for a good
> reason.
 
I'd bet a dozen muffins that is the case and why I am making my point
strongly. If he can't get memset to work, I very much doubt the target
OS, C++ implementation, or maintainability of the code in the future has
even been a consideration, much less what the type is in relation to
what he wants it to be and how it related to the other types he is using.
Luca Risolia <luca.risolia@linux-projects.org>: Feb 04 10:42PM +0100

Il 04/02/2015 22:31, Christopher Pisz ha scritto:
 
> throw std::exception("Expected one byte unsigned char. Unsupported
> OS or compiler options.");
> }
 
?! you want to use a static assertion for that..
Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>: Feb 04 09:44PM

ghada glissa <ghadaglissa@gmail.com> writes:
<snip>
> Thank you Mr Jend for your help, i used printf( "%02x", nonce[ i ] )
> and it improve the display of values less than 0x10,i get this result
> 010000000048deac but i can't resolve the problem of order with memcpy.
 
There isn't really a "problem of order with memcpy". The problem is
most likely to do with what you expect. Try this and see if you are
happy with (and understand) the result:
 
union rep {
unsigned long as_ulong;
uint8_t as_bytes[sizeof (unsigned long)];
} address = { 0xacde480000000001 };

int main()
{
for (int i = 0; i < sizeof address; i++)
printf("%02x", address.as_bytes[i]);
putchar('\n');
return 0;
}
 
No memcpy, just a print of the bytes in an object in sequence, from
lowest to highest address.
 
--
Ben.
Christopher Pisz <nospam@notanaddress.com>: Feb 04 03:53PM -0600

On 2/4/2015 3:42 PM, Luca Risolia wrote:
>> OS or compiler options.");
>> }
 
> ?! you want to use a static assertion for that..
 
I wasn't aware of static assertion's existence yet. It's a C++11
feature? Compile time?
 
I am still catching up to the latest C++ standard. Doesn't appear to be
in my particular compiler at work. Will try when I get home. I can like
to learn new stuff too!
Luca Risolia <luca.risolia@linux-projects.org>: Feb 04 10:57PM +0100

Il 04/02/2015 22:53, Christopher Pisz ha scritto:
 
>> ?! you want to use a static assertion for that..
 
> I wasn't aware of static assertion's existence yet. It's a C++11
> feature? Compile time?
 
It's more a concept than a feature. There are many pre-C++11
implementations of static assertions.
Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid>: Feb 04 04:58PM -0500

On 2/4/2015 4:31 PM, Christopher Pisz wrote:
> If your target platform doesn't specifically guarantee it for you, which
> it usually does. Then I'd still rather see:
 
> if( sizeof(unsigned char) != 1 )
 
You basically wrote
 
if (false)
 
because by definitnion sizeof(char) == 1. You probably meant something like
 
if (std::numeric_limits<unsigned char>::digits != 8)
 
> OS or compiler options.");
> }
>[..]
 
V
--
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
peter koch <peter.koch.larsen@gmail.com>: Feb 04 04:32AM -0800

Den tirsdag den 3. februar 2015 kl. 23.06.24 UTC+1 skrev Lynn McGuire:
> > and mistakes can be corrected rapidly.
 
> I totally disagree. If https://www.wxwidgets.org/ was made a standard then all of the platform developers would at least attempt
> to support it.
 
But there is also fltk and QT. And then there are all the nonportable libraries lying around.
I use WxWidgets because it is the best choice for me (I will not use QT because of licensing issues and fltk was simply to lowlevel (and visually ugly) for me). But I must say that the programming interface is very far from what I would expect a good C++ library to have. This is a deliberate choice from the Wxwidgets developers and probably related to history and a need to support ancient compilers. But it is also a very good reason to dismiss it as a candidate for standardisation.
 
/Peter
"CHE SIA REVOLUCIOOON!!!" <jesseporeddu@aim.com>: Feb 04 04:07AM -0800

SCHIFOSA BERLUS-CORROTTA PUTTANA MARIA ELENA BOSCHI, NON PAGA DI SUE RIFORME BASTARDAMENTE NAZISTE, NON PAGA DEGLI INSIDER TRADING CHE PASSA AL CRIMINALE VERME DAVIDE SERRA DI ALGEBRIS, ORA VUOLE SGOZZARE LA GIUSTIZIA VIA SALVABERLUSCONI. REVOLUCION!

STO LURIDO NAZINDRANGHETISTA DI DAVIDE SERRA DI ALGEBRIS E TWITTER HA RICEVUTO L'INSIDER TRADING SULLE BANCHE POPOLARI DA NOTO LAVA SOLDI MAFIOSI PIER LUIGI BOSCHI DI AREZZO E BANCA ETRURIA. HA PURE RAGLIATO CHE COMPRA BANCHE POPOLARI DAL MARZO 2014. SPUTTANANDOSI ANCORA DI PIU', COME UN IMBECILLE, PEDERASTA SODOMIZZA BAMBINI E MEGA COCAINOMANE, QUALE DA SEMPRE E'. IL SUO POR-CO-RROTTISSIMO MATTEO RENZI (CHE VIA "SS", SPINTA E STECCHE DI SILVIO BERLUSCONI, HA SCIPPATO SEGRETERIA PD E PALAZZO CHIGI, NEL SECONDO CASO COL FEBBRAIO 2014), GLI HA PASSATO, ATTRAVERSO "A ZOCCOLONA BERLUSCONICCHIA, STECCATISSIMA E CELLULITOSA" MARIA ELENA BOSCHI http://www.dagospia.com/img/foto/08-2014/maria-elena-boschi-bikini-rosa-in-spiaggia-a-marina-di-pietrasanta-581617_tn.jpg E IL VERME MEGA LAVA SOLDI MAFIOSI PIER LUIGI BOSCHI DI BANCA ETRURIA, L'INSIDER SULLE BANCHE POPOLARI. E PER QUESTO, STO ESCREMENTO HITLERIANO DI DAVIDE SERRA DI TWITTER E ALGEBRIS, SI E' MESSO A COMPRARE BANCHE POPOLARI DAL MARZO 2014. UN MESE DOPO (ULLALA CHE COINCIDENZA, ULLALA). SEMPRE INSIDER E'. TRATTASI DI MANDRIA DI PORCI FASCIOCAMORRISTI, TIPO, ANCHE, NOTO AVANZO DI GALERA PAOLO BARRAI (DI CRIMINALISSIME WMO, BSI ITALIA SRL DI VIA SOCRATE 26 MILANO E BLOG "MERDATO"LIBERO), CHE SI FINGONO DEL PD, X... DISTRUGGERLO, INFILTRARLO A MORTE, RENDERLO DIARREA BERLUSCONICCHIA! VOGLIAMO UNA ACCESISSIMA E VINCENTISSIMA REVOLUCIOOOOOON! VOGLIAMO IL CANCROMICIDA DEL MONDO INTERO, SILVIO BERLUSCONI, FALLITO ED IN GALERA! SUBITO! PLS, DOTTOR SERGIO MATTARELLA, CI DIA UNA MANO. IN ONORE A SUO FRATELLO UCCISO DALLA MAFIA ( MAFIA CHE QUANDO SI METTE LA FASCISTISSIMA CRAVATTA DOLCE E GABBANA, SIGNIFICA SILVIO BERLUSCONI E DAVIDE SERRA). IN ONORE AD ETERNI GIOVANNI FALCONE E PAOLO BORSELLINO, FATTI SPAPPOLARE, SICURISSIMAMENTE, DA SILVIO BERLUSCONI, VIA, A SUA VOLTA, BERLUSCONIANISSIMA COSA NOSTRA! ED OLTRE A VOLER SILVIO BERLUSCONI FALLITO ED IN GALERA, VOGLIAMO VEDERE IL SUO PICCIOTTO INCRAVATTATO, IL FACCENDIERE DI BERLUSCONAZISTI, PADANAZISTI, E CRIMINALITA' ORGANIZZATE DI MEZZO MONDO, PAOLO BARRAI DI MALAVITOSA WMO, PURE, IN GALERA! VOGLIAMO IL NUOVO GIANCARLO LANDE, IL NUOVO BERNARD MADOFF, IL NUOVO MICHELE SINDONA, VERME CRIMINALISSIMO DAVIDE SERRA DI TWITTER ED ALGEBRIS, FALLITO, E PER LO MENO, PER QUALCHE MESE, IN GALERA! CHE SIA ETICISSSIMA E VINCENTISSIMA REVOLUCIOOOOON!
COME DA OTTIMO SITO INFORMARE X RESISTERE:
http://www.informarexresistere.fr/2015/01/27/qualcuno-sapeva-in-anticipo-che-il-governo-avrebbe-varato-un-provvedimento-sulle-banche-popolari-enormi-speculazioni/

COME DA CORRIERE DELLA SERA, DI, OTTIMAMENTE, ANTIRENZUSCONIANO FERRUCCIO DE BORTOLI, DA NON TOCCARE E A TUTTI I COSTI:
http://www.corriere.it/economia/15_gennaio_24/quei-movimenti-un-po-sospetti-popolari-f59ffb1c-a3a5-11e4-808e-442fa7f91611.shtml

Acquisti consistenti prima della riforma che ha abolito il voto capitario. La famiglia Boschi ha sicurissimamente passato insider trading a Londra, tramite noto ladro, truffatore, nazifascista, immensamente ricicla soldi mafiosi, che affatto va' in Tanzania a fare del bene, in quanto vi va' a riciclare cash di (sua) LL Lega Ladrona, come per suoi gusti sessuali di tipo depravatissimo: avanzo di galera Davide Serra di Algebris e Twitter. Dove prenderanno, le mazzette, ora, i vermi nazifascisti Pier Luigi Boschi di Banca Etruria e sua zoccolona ( di fatto) Berlusconicchia Maria Elena Boschi ( bastarda puttanazista che vuole sgozzare la giustizia via estremissimamente ingiusta salvaberlusconi http://www.blitzquotidiano.it/rassegna-stampa/libero-renzi-per-fare-la-pace-offre-la-salva-berlusconi-che-fara-mattarella-2090491/ .... che qui, non per niente, slingua un topo di fogna corrotto, ndranghetista, fascista, estortore di soldi alla Banca Popolare di Lodihttp://www.repubblica.it/2005/l/sezioni/economia/banche21/ipolitici/ipolitici.html .. pezzo di merda criminalissimo Paolo Romani
http://www.corriere.it/methode_image/2014/08/08/Politica/Foto%20Politica%20-%20Trattate/6ebdfe07bdd8cb1fe88af8343f8a5b1c-012-kXsC-U43030145012273wcB-593x443@Corriere-Web-Sezioni.jpg?v=20140808175213 )?
A) Alle Bahamas
B) Alle Bermuda
C) A Panama
D) Ad Hong Kong
E) A Singapore
F) Alle Mauritius ( "roba" tipo Svizzera e' da anni 70, 80: stile nazimafioso pedofilo Silvio Berlusconi e suo B-o-ttino Craxi, dai, please)
Lauti premi a chi azzecca per primo.
---
BRAVO, BRAVO, DAVVERO BRAVISSIMO ELIO LANNUTTI A QUERELARE STO VERME BERLUS-CORROTTTISSIMO DI MATTEO RENZI:
http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2015/01/21/denuncia-per-renzi/1357263/
CHE SBEFFEGGIA PM PER BENE, EROICI, SALVA NAZIONE ( SPESSO FATTI ESPLODERE, COME IL NAZIMAFIOSO PEDOFILO STRAGISTA SILVIO BERLUSCONI FECE FARE CON GLI ETERNI GIOVANNI FALCONE E PAOLO BORSELLINO). TIPO QUELLI DI PALERMO, BARI, MILANO, NAPOLI, DICENDO, ANZI, RAGLIANDO LORO: "'OOOO OO CHE PAURA, MI FANNO, OO OO"
http://tv.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2014/09/10/renzi-anm-protesta-brrrrr-che-paura-sciopero-sindacati-polizia-illegale/295911/
CHE RABBIA MOSTRUOSISSIMA, QUESTO VERMINOSO, CRIMINALISSIMO TRAFFICARE FRA POR-CO-RRUTTORE MAXIMO SILVIO BERLUSCONI E POR-CO-RROTTO MAXIMO MATTEO RENZI!
https://ilgrandetsunami.wordpress.com/2015/01/17/berlusconi-che-ne-sara-di-me-il-2-febbraio-carmelo-lopapa/
"IO TI VOTO LE RIFORME (ODIOSISSIMAMENTE MAFIOSE E FASCISTE, OSSIA BERLUSCONIANISSIME) CHE STAI APPRONTANDO ( VEDI SENATORI NON ELETTI E CAPOLISTA BLOCCATI, COSA CHE ANCHE I VERMINOSI MATTEO RENZI E SILVIO BERLUSCONI DEGLI ULTIMI 8 DECENNI, OSSIA ADOLF HITLER, BENITO MUSSOLINI, ALFREDO STROESSNER, FRANCISCO FRANCO, EMILIO EDUARDO MASSERA, AUGUSTO PINOCHET E POL POT AVREBBERO SENTITO TANTISSIMO PUDORE AL SOL PROVARE A PENSARNE), TU METTI AL QUIRINALE UN FANTOCCIO DI MIA PROPRIETA' CHE COMPRO QUANDO VOGLIO QUALE GIULIANO AMATO, VALTER VELTRONI O ANNA FINOCCHIARO ... O MEGLIO ANCORA, SE PARLIAMO DI MIEI FASCIOBAMBOCCI ALLA PIERFERDINANDO CASINI O GIANNI LETTA... TUTTI MIEI PUPAZZI CHE MI HAN GIA' GARANTITO CHE CON SEI EURO E MEZZO CASH, MI FIRMEREBBERO TUTTE LE GRAZIE CHE VOGLIO IN NOME DELLA MIA.... PACIFICAZIONE ALLA VASELLINA... E ... SPECIALMENTE ...GIUSTO PER ANDARE SUL SICURO.... MI FAI ANCHE E SUBITO UNA NORMINA DECAPITANTE NOIOSISSIMI CONCETTI COME DEMOCRAZIA E GIUSTIZIA CHE IMPONGA IL MIO TORNARE IN POLITICA, COSI' CHE POSSA FOTTERE IL POPOLO CIUCCIO, LE LEGGI, DOZZINE DI (GRANDISSIMI) MAGISTRATI COME ILDA BOCASSINI, EDMONDO BRUTI LIBERATI, NINO DI MATTEO, ROBERTO SCARPINATO, FABIO DE PASQUALE, HENRY WOODCOCK, PASQUALE DRAGO, ATTRAVERSO LA ( BASTARDAMENTE VIGLIACCHISSIMA) IMMUNITA' EVITA GALERA, CHE MI RI RITROVEREI"!
http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2015/01/18/salva-berlusconi-alessandro-pace-manina-renzi-reato-falso/1349562/
http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2015/01/08/salva-berlusconi-mucchetti-renzi-venga-senato-spiegare-successo/1322595/
http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2015/01/06/salva-berlusconi-coppi-ammette-quella-norma-segnale-per-quirinale/1318110/
ECCO DOVE CI PORTANO BASTARDI LAVA CASH MAFIOSO A GO GO COME I MALAVITOSINCRAVATTATI DAVIDE SERRA DI ALGEBRIS E TWITTER INSIEME AL RENATO VALLANZASCA UNITO AD UGO FANTOZZI DELLA FINANZA, NOTO AVANZO DI GALERA PAOLO BARRAI NATO A MILANO IL 28.6.1965, DI CRIMINALISSIMO WMO, CRIMINALISSIMA BSI ITALIA SRL DI VIA SOCRATE 26 MILANO E CRIMINALISSIMO BLOG MERCATO "MERDATO" LIBERO ( DUE VERMI REPELLENTI CHE RICICLANO ALL'ESTERO VAGONI DI SOLDI DI COSA NOSTRA, CAMORRA, NDRANGHETA O LADRATI SE NON PURE FRUTTO DI MEGA MAZZETTE IN DIREZIONE LL LEGA LADRONA ED EX PDL POPOLO DI LADRONI; IN CONGIUNZIONE CON BANCHIERI DELINQUENTISSIMI, SPESSO PURE MANDANTI DI OMICIDI O "SUICIDATE", COME FATTO CON DAVID ROSSI DI MONTE PASCHI, QUALI GLI ASSASSINI ENNIO DORIS E MASSIMO DORIS DI BANCA MEDIOLANUM; O QUALE "O MASSONE CAMORRISTA" GIUSEPPE SABATO DI BANCA ESPERIA
http://www.gruppoesperia.it/chi-siamo/giuseppe-sabato.html
https://books.google.it/books?id=B1mEj0GtktIC&pg=PT304&lpg=PT304&dq=GIUSEPPE+SABATO+LICIO+GELLI&source=bl&ots=Gqtu0KYRmD&sig=d2TOz9sZDY6563zIPxwnNYcbxb4&hl=it&sa=X&ei=I-i_VOOsBMLlUonCgZgI&ved=0CFMQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=GIUSEPPE%20SABATO%20LICIO%20GELLI&f=false
TUTTI DEL GRUPPO MA-F-INIVEST DI " STEFANO BONTATE, MARCELLO DELL'UTRI, TOTO RIINA, LICIO GELLI, BERNARDO PROVENZANO E SILVIO BERLUSCONI: " OO CHE CASO, OO")! E PROPRIO MENTRE VIENO ACCLARATO CHE STO VERME COLERICO E STECCATISSIMO DI MATTEO RENZI, COME INTUITO DA GENIO BORSISTICO ED EROE CIVILE MICHELE NISTA DA ANNI E NON "SOLO" 11 MESI, E' IN POLITICA, IN PRIMIS, PER PROTEGGERE IL TOPO DI FOGNA DI SUO PADRE, TIZIANO RENZI. ACCERTATO BANCAROTTIERE FRAUDOLENTISSIMO, ACCERTATO NEOPIDUISTA LADRONE E TRUFFATORE! CHE HA SODOMIZZATO UN MILIONE DI EURO A FIDI TOSCANA E LI HA FATTI PAGARE AL POPOLO CIUCCIO, VIA SUO BASTARDO NAZIMAFIOSO POR-CO-RROTTO DITTATORE MATTEO RENZI!
http://www.beppegrillo.it/2015/01/i_conflitti_dinteressi_della_famiglia_renzie.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7Ngp6JrK9A
http://robertoiacobone.altervista.org/debiti-azienda-di-famiglia-renzi-pagati-dal-governo-renzi/?doing_wp_cron=1421500410.9769570827484130859375
VOGLIAMO A PALAZZO CHIGI STEFANO FASSINA SUBITO! INSIEME AL PD PER BENE, QUELLO ANTI MAFIA FASCISTA DI MATTEO RENZI! INSIEME, OVVIAMENTE, A M5S E SEL! A FARE IL SUO VERO LAVORO, OSSIA LA ZOCCOLA DI STRADA, STA BATTONA HITLERIANA, CHE SI CREDE MODELLA MA E' CESSO STRA COLMO DI CELLULITE, DI MARIA ELENA BOSCHI http://www.dagospia.com/img/foto/08-2014/maria-elena-boschi-bikini-rosa-in-spiaggia-a-marina-di-pietrasanta-581617_tn.jpg FIGLIA DI ALTRO VERME CRIMINALISSIMO: MEGA LAVA SOLDI MAFIOSI PIER LUIGI BOSCHI DI BANCA ETRURIA (DOPO AVER PASSATO TUTTA UNA VITA A TRAFFICARE CON COOP VICINISSIME A MAFIA, CAMORRA E NDRANGHETA, NON PER NIENTE, STILE "RENZUSCONIANISSIMI" SALVATORE BUZZI E MASSIMO CARMINATI)! AL QUIRINALE UN UOMO O DONNA VERA, ALLA NINO DI MATTEO O ILDA BOCASSINI, CHE FACCIA TRASLOCARE IL CANCROMICIDA DEL MONDO INTERO, SILVIO BERLUSCONI, DA PALAZZO GRAZIOLI A PALAZZO UCCIARDONE E SUBITO. O VERA RIVOLUZIONE SARA'! RIVOLUZIONE RIPRISTINANTE VERA DEMOCRACIA Y LIBERTAD! PS SEMPRE VINCENTISSIMI I GENI BORSISTICI GEORGE SOROS E MICHELE NISTA A PUNTARE SULLA SPAGNA. PARREBBE CHE DOPO AVER SAPUTO CHE IL MIGLIORE FIUTO PER QUALSIASI COSA AL MONDO, MICHELE NISTA, VEDA NON MALE LA SPAGNA, GEORGE SOROS ABBIA DECISO DI METTERCI SUBITO, MANCO FOSSERO NOCCIOLINE, 500 MILIONI DI EURO, NELL'AUMENTO DI CAPITALE DI BANCO SANTANDER. NON SARA' UN PAESE IMMUNE DI DIFETTI, LA SPAGNA, COME NON LO E' ALCUN PAESE DEL PIANETA TERRA. ANCHE LI, GLI SCANDALI PER CORRUZIONE NON MANCANO ( MA SONO AL MASSIMO UN DECIMO, RISPETTO A QUELLI DELLA CLOACA DI RENZUSCONIA)! PERO', NONOSTANTE MEZZO SECOLO DI NAZIFASCISMO, OGGI LI VI E' DEMOCRAZIA VERA. SIA AL POTERE MARIANO RAJOY DELL'OPUS DEI O IL PROMETTENTISSIMO PABLO IGLESIAS DI PODEMOS. NON VI SONO, SULLA GOVERNATIVA POLTRONA DI MADRID, VERMI STRAGISTI, FASCIOCAMORRISTI E PEDOFILI ALLA SILVIO BERLUSCONI, CHE SI FAN LE LEGGI PER GONFIARSI LE TASCHE DI SOLDI LERCISSIMI OLTRE CHE PER SGOZZARE A MORTE DEMOCRAZIA E GIUSTIZIA, OGNI GIORNO. E QUESTO, O IN PROPRIO, O COMPRANDOSI RAGAZZINI CORROTTISSIMI CHIAMANTISI MATTEO, COME MATTEO RENZI (OGGI). O IL NUOVO ADOLF HITLER: MATTEO SALVINI (DOMANI). MENTRE L'UNICO PADRONE, L'UNICO VERO BOSS DEL CANCROMICIDA DEL MONDO INTERO, SILVIO BERLUSCONI, UN ALTRO MATTEO, MATTEO MESSINA DENARO, SORRIDE E DICE " BRAVO MIO PRESTANOME BEDDU SILVIO BERLUSCONI, HAI TRASFORMATO L'ITALIA IN RENZUSCONIA, CHE IN REALTA' SEMPRE BERLUSCONIA E', AAAAAAA.. COME PIACE A MMMIA, AAAA.... E' TUTTO UNA COSA NOSTRA, SILVIUZZEDDU BEDDU .. CONTINUA COSI' CHE TI TROVIAMO QUALCHE ALTRA BEDDA PROSTITUTA DI 12-14 ANNI PELLU TEMPU LIBERO, AAAAA.... QUESTA VOLTA CAMBIAMO, AAAA... TE LA TROVIAMO FILIPPINA E LA FACCIAMO PASSARE PER LA NIPOTE DEL RE DELLA THAILANDIA, BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, IL RE PIU' RICCO DEL MONDO... CHE SPESSO E VOLENTIERI "ABOLISCE UFFICIALISSIMAMENTE LA DEMOCRAZIA"... SI... SILVIUZZEDDU BEDDU DA COSA NOSTRA, TI TROVIAMO UNA BAMBINA FILIPPINA DI 12 ANNI DA SBAVARE E TOCCARE QUANTO VUOI... E LA FACCIAMO PASSARE PER LA NIPOTE THAILANDESE DI BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, AAAA.... COSI' VEDRAI CHE QUANDO TELEFONI, PREOCCUPATISSIMO, DA PARIGI ( TANTO, FRA POCO, NELLA TUA DITTATURA DELLE BANANAS DI RENZUSCONIA, SUBITO, IL PASSAPORTO, TI RIDARANNO), I POLIZIOTTI O QUESTORI, SOLO E SEMPRE LA TUA VOLONTA', FARANNO, AAA"!!!
bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Feb 04 01:07PM +0100

Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com>: Feb 03 04:03PM -0800

On 1/29/2015 8:12 AM, Vlad from Moscow wrote:
> Is any on-line Clang compiler?
 
http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/
 
The command line at the bottom is editable. If it doesn't say 'clang'
already, just edit it to replace the 'g++' with 'clang'.
 
--
Best regards,
Andrey Tarasevich
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)