- About C and C++ - 2 Updates
- Software life cycle - 1 Update
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Feb 24 04:59PM -0800 Hello... I have saw some programmers talking about C on the C's forums... But as you have seen me talking before on my post titled "Software life cycle" , you have noticed that i have talked about the criterions that is "Maintainability" and "modifiability", what i don't like in C is that if you want to group efficiently functions and some propoerties that are shared inside an object , you can not do that efficiently as can do Object Pascal or C++, if you are writing in C you have to use global variables, but that's not good for "maintenance" and "clarity" of the code, in C++ or Object pascal you will not use global variables but you will use an object that enhance the clarity and maintainability... this is why i don't like C, other than that since Java is garbage collected it enhance the "Reliability" and "Security" criterions, ADA also is good at Reliability and security, i think C and C++ score less on those criterions that are reliability and security than Java or ADA. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Feb 24 05:13PM -0800 Hello... Even if you can use structs to group functions and there shared variables in C, that's not as efficient as C++ or Object Pascal, in C++ or Object Pascal you can use public and private... properties and that's efficient and you can use also generics and lambda expressions to write less code and to easy maintenance... C is becoming an "old" thing that makes the things more complex and difficult for us programmers i think... Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Feb 24 04:07PM -0800 Hello, As you have seen me talking here, i have talked in my previous post about "software quality and programming", what you have seen me saying is that we have to take into account many critera in software quality, such us: - Reliability - Efficiency - Security - Maintainability - Identifying critical programming errors - and portability - expressivness But I have forget to talk about the modifiability's criterion , because modifiability is important also, that means if you do modify a method or an object inside the software , this modification must have as a "consequence" to create a "localized" modification to the method or to the object to easy also maintenance and to improve "maintainability", so this is the criterion called modifiability that we must take into account and this is the goal that we must attain by using object oriented programming etc. Anyway, what's i want to say in this post, is that what you have seen me talking about is how to attain a good software quality by setting the goals that are to score high on those criterions above , but to score high on those criterions above is a necessary but not a sufficient condition, because in software lifecycle we must also use a methodology like agile methodology that is more optimal to be able to deliver a software with minimal "costs", "waste", and "time", thus enabling companies to be competitive and achieve gains. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane,. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment