- Please read again... - 2 Updates
- Lestin to this conversation - 1 Update
- More about wisdom and more about what's an inventoin - 1 Update
- My way of defining what's an invention - 1 Update
- Here is my answer - 1 Update
- What's computer programming - 2 Updates
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Feb 22 08:58PM -0800 I correct: i didn't know than we say criterion for single, and criteria for many criterions.. because i don't speak english enough , so please read again i have corrected my post... Hello, Now more about "wisdom" and about what's an invention... We have to have "wisdom" also to define more correctly what's an invention... So please follow with me because i will try to define more what's an invention... If we look at programming, how then can we define an invention in programming ? we can take the sadistic way of thinking and define it to have overall a quality of 9/10 and 10/10, but this is not a correct way of defining what's an invention, so how can we define an invention in programming and what's the correct way to define invention ? invention can be defined from the point of view of one "criterion", or from the point of view of many "criterion", so what are those criteria that we must think about when defining an invention, we have the criterion of how easy to use is the library or program, and this is like "art", it's like if you are painting a more "beautiful" picture, so i will give you an example to understand me more, if you look for example at my parallel varfiler here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/parallel-varfiler you will notice that my parallel varfiler is a parallel hashtable that can work from the memory and that can be saved manually to a hardisk's file and that can be saved automaticly to a hardisk's file at realtime: i mean everytime you add a key and its corresponding data, it will add it immediatly to the memory and to the hardisk's file, so from the point of view of the "easy" of use, we can consider it an invention because the interface is easy to use and more beautiful to use, it's like "art", you have to look at it like looking at a beautiful painting picture... also the fact that it's a parallel hashtable that uses lock striping and the fact that it supports those characteristics that i have just talked about makes it a good condidate to be called an invention...so if you understand me more, i am defining an invention in programming also like a painting art, and i am telling you that if the interface is creative in the easy of use, so if it's more beautiful than other libraries, so we can call that an invention, my definition applies to my other projects... and of course we can judge and define an invention from the point of you of other criteria like efficiency and/or speed and/or portability etc. Thank you for your time. Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Feb 22 11:39PM -0800 Hello... A Little Less Conversation (Elvis vs JXL) Lestin to this conversation, it's like my conversation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx1_6F-nCaw Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Feb 22 11:36PM -0800 Hello, A Little Less Conversation (Elvis vs JXL) Lestin to this conversation, it's like my conversation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx1_6F-nCaw Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Feb 22 07:58PM -0800 Hello, Now more about "wisdom" and about what's an invention... We have to have "wisdom" also to define more correctly what's an invention... So please follow with me because i will try to define more what's an invention... If we look at programming, how then can we define an invention in programming ? we can take the sadistic way of thinking and define it to have overall a quality of 9/10 and 10/10, but this is not a correct way of defining what's an invention, so how can we define an invention in programming and what's the correct way to define invention ? invention can be defined from the point of view of one "criteria", or from the point of view of many "criterias", so what are those criteria that we must think about when defining an invention, we have the criteria of how easy to use is the library or program, and this is like "art", it's like if you are painting a more "beautiful" picture, so i will give you an example to understand me more, if you look for example at my parallel varfiler here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/parallel-varfiler you will notice that my parallel varfiler is a parallel hashtable that can work from the memory or that can be saved manually to a hardisk's file or that can be saved automaticly to a hardisk's file at realtime: i mean everytime you add a key and its corresponding data, it will add it immediatly to the memory and to the hardisk's file, so from the point of view of the "easy" of use, we can considere it an invention because the interface is easy to use and mroe beautiful to use, it's like "art", you have to look at it like looking at a beautiful painting picture... also the fact that it's a parallel hashtable that uses lock striping and the fact that it supports those characteristics that i have just talked about makes it a good condidate to be called an invention...so if you understand me more, i am defining an invention in programming also like a painting art, and i am telling you that if the interface is creative in the easy of use, so if it's more beautiful than other libraries so we can call that an invention, my definition applies to my other projects... and of course we an judge and define an invention from the point of you of other criterias like efficiency and/or speed and/or portability etc. Thank you for your time. Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Feb 22 06:39PM -0800 Jerry Stuckle wrote to me: >You didn't invent crap. All you did was implement already developed >algorithms. Something any programmer does every day. >All you're doing is making yourself look even more stupid. You are a kind of stupid guy too.. Because you have to define what's an invention... You are defining an invention as one that must have a quality of 9/10 or 10/10 and you are taking into account the criteria of "difficulty" an the "size" of the invention, you are saying that an invention that is not of a big size or/and of a degree of difficulty that is high is not an invention, but your way of defining invention is a sadistic way of defining what's an invention. My inventions that i have talked before are inventions too, but you have to have more "wisdom" to agree with me, you are a low level person when it comes to the criteria of "wisdom". Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Feb 22 05:37PM -0800 Silvio wrote: >Please stop using the word "invent" when you haven't actually invented >anything. It makes you come over as very stupid. You look like a kind of stupid guy, because you are not using your intellect to reason better.. You say i didn't invented algorithms and libraries ? Look here at my invention called SemaCondvar and SemaMonitor here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/semacondvar-semamonitor Where do you have such this concepts and this objects in Java or C++ or C# tell me ? my SemaCondVar and SemaMonitor combines all the characteristics of a windows event object and a windows semaphore and an EventCount and a condition variable and it adds also the following characteristic: When you pass True in the first parameter of the constructor the signal(s) will not be lost even if there is no waiting threads, if it's False the signal(s) will be lost if there is no waiting thread. You see now ? this is my invention and you will not find it in C++ or C# or Java. And look at my other invention here called scalable MLock: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-mlock My scalable MLock is waitfree, read about it more on my webpage... An look at my other invention called , parallel conjugate gradient linear system solver library that is cache-aware and scalable on "NUMA" architecture here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-parallel-implementation-of-conjugate-gradient-linear-system-solver-library-that-is-numa-aware-and-cache-aware Also look here at my other invention called parallel varfiler, it is very powerful , you will not find it in C# or Java or C++, you have to read about it here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/more-scalable-parallel-varfiler I have also invented a scalable RWLock with many variants, read about them here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-rwlock I have also invented other libraries like my parallel archiver etc. please look at them here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/more-scalable-parallel-varfiler So from now on don't say that i didn't invented algorithm and libraries.. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Feb 22 04:04PM -0800 Hello, I was thinking more, and i have come to an interesting subject.. I was asking myself what`s computer programming ? And after i have learned to program and after i have invented many algorithms and parallel libraries ... I think i am able now to define more what is computer programming... I will define it like the following: Computer programming is like "robotics", when you construct a robot you have to give it legs and hands and motors etc. and you have to learn it how to behave by incorporating in it "knowledge" to give it the ability to behave in different ways: such as walk , and jump etc. so computer programming is like robotics , because when you construct a computer program it is like constructing a robot, you have to construct every parts of the program by constructing "objects" and there "properties", and you have to give your program "knowlege" by implementing the "methods" of the objects to give your program the ability to behave in different ways, like a robot... this is how i can define programming , it's like robotics... Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Feb 22 04:45PM -0800 On 2/22/2015 1:09 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:> No, it's more like creating a list of instructions that a computer can > is basically a computer with peripherals that can move, and you have to > program the movements. The definition thus becomes recursive, and not in > a helpful way. I don't agree with you.. Because what's a physical robot ? and what's a computer ? When you construct a computer program , you also move and mix and work with bit and bytes and you also do measurements on the bits and bytes and on conceptual representations and numerical representations of physical objects to construct other objects from bits and bytes and from objects and from methods and conceptual representations and numerical representations of physical objects and you have to incorporate knowledge in it to give it the ability to behave in different ways... so a computer program is like a physical microprocessor or a computer or a robot, because to construct a them have to move and mix the matter and to work with matter and do measurements on the matter to construct physical representations (from a concept also), and you have to incorporate in them "knowledge" to give them the ability to behave in different ways: so computer programs are like a physical microprocessors, or physical computers or a physical robots... Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment