- Now about my USL programs solvers... - 1 Update
- cmsg cancel <nf2l5j$580$2@dont-email.me> - 10 Updates
- This USL methodology is amazing ! - 1 Update
- How to validate my USL programs to be sure that they work correctly ? - 1 Update
- My words about the USL methodology - 1 Update
- A more precise proof... - 1 Update
- Read more, it is a happy day ! - 2 Updates
- Here is my contributions of my USL programs.. - 1 Update
- About the USL methodology, important ! - 1 Update
- I think i have found the solution .... - 1 Update
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Apr 18 03:26PM -0700 Hello... Now about my USL programs solvers... I have used a second implementation of the BFGS Quasi-Newton second-derivative line search family method as minimization function for my nonlinear regression solver of USL programs, it is one of the most powerful methods to solve unconstrained optimization problem , but it didn't solve all the problems that the simplex method of Nelder an Mead all solved, so i think i will stay with my nonlinear regression solver that uses the simplex method of Nelder and Mead that have solved all the problems that i have given to it, i think it is a good solver for my purpose of my USL programs. I have included the 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables of my programs inside the zip file to easy the job for you. You can download my USL programs version 3.0 with the source code from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Apr 18 02:53PM +0200 |
bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Apr 18 02:59PM +0200 |
bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Apr 18 03:15PM +0200 |
bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Apr 18 03:34PM +0200 |
bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Apr 18 04:23PM +0200 |
bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Apr 18 05:37PM +0200 |
bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Apr 18 06:28PM +0200 |
bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Apr 18 06:54PM +0200 |
bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Apr 18 07:32PM +0200 |
bleachbot <bleachbot@httrack.com>: Apr 18 09:24PM +0200 |
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Apr 18 01:33PM -0700 Hello... This USL methodology is amazing ! Look at this link about the USL methodology about mixed workload on Ecommerce websites from Dr. Gunther the author of USL methodology: http://perfdynamics.blogspot.ca/2009/04/assessing-usl-scalability-with-mixed.html Now that you have understood my previous more precise proof about USL methodology.. I will explain to you why the content of the above link from Dr. Gunther works: On Ecommerce websites, from my previous proof the USL methodology will capture correctly the tendency of the graph of the nonlinear regression of the database server, but for the Internet network, because we have two things when modeling of Ecommerce websites , we have the computer server of the database system and we have the internet network, so for the internet network, the USL methodology will capture correctly the tendency of the graph of the nonlinear regression of the Internet network, because the internet network have a more linear shape of the graph of the scalability with more and more internet users using it.. This is why USL methodology can model the Ecommerce websites too with mixed workloads too, so USL methodology is an amazing great tool that can predict scalability ! Please try my USL programs because they are working great and they predict scalability ! I have included the 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables of my programs inside the zip file to easy the job for you. You can download my USL programs version 3.0 with the source code from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Apr 18 12:56PM -0700 Hello...... How to validate my USL programs to be sure that they work correctly ? I have first tested my USL programs with polynomial regression against the R package of USL with the default solver with the raytracer performance data of the R package and they are giving the same results that is the peak number of processors at 449 and the same predicted scalability, but my nonlinear solver that uses the simplex method as a function minimization is giving a very good approximation of the predicted scalability, i have also tested with other performance data from my parallel LZMA algorithm and parallel LZ4 algorithm of my parallel compression library and the R package is giving the same results as my USL program solvers. So you can be confident with my USL programs because they are working great and are great tools for predicting scalability. I have included the 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables of my programs inside the zip file to easy the job for you. You can download my USL programs version 3.0 with the source code from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Apr 18 12:30PM -0700 Hello.... As you have noticed i have come with a proof that makes you feel more that the USL methodology that makes forecasting of scalability possible is a success and is an amazing tool.. Why have i done it this way ? Because Dr. Gunther the author of the USL methodology didn't spook about why his methodology works using nonlinear regression or polynomial regression, even on his book Guerilla capacity planning that explains his methodology, he didn't explain what why it works.. so this is why i have come with a more precise proof that makes you feel why the nonlinear regression of the USL methodology works.. Other than that, i think that we can be confident because Dr. Gunther is an expert that knows what he is doing , so this i why i think that the USL methodology is a success and is an amazing great tool that predicts sclability. Here is my contributions of my USL programs.. I have first implemented a solver for my USL program that is polynomial regression, this solver must make the a0 coefficient of the mathematical series to 0, but this solver is not so efficient as my other solver that i have implemented that is nonlinear regression using the simplex method of of Nelder and Mead as a function minimization, this nonlinear solver that i have implemented works perfectly and is more efficient than the solver that uses polynomial regression, also my contribution is my USL programs that is called usl_graph that provides you with a more interractive graphical chart that permit you to optimize more the criterion of the cost, i think that the other R package is less powerful on this option. Also in my USL programs i have calculated and feed my nonlinear solver with partial derivatives of the USL equation: C(N) = N/(1 + α (N − 1) + β N (N − 1)) I have calculated the partial derivative with respect to α of the above USL equation, and i have calculated the partial derivative with respect to β of the above USL equation, and the two partial derivatives must be given to my nonlinear solver that uses the simplex method of of Nelder and Mead as a function minimization. Please try my USL programs because they are working great and they predict scalability ! I have included the 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables of my programs inside the zip file to easy the job for you. You can download my USL programs version 3.0 with the source code from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Apr 18 11:39AM -0700 Hello, I have wrote in my proof this: "If the serial part of the Amdahl's equation is bigger and system makes the chance higher to escape the contention when we test and analyses with fewer threads an fewer cores with USL methodology, that means that the chance is higher that the next step with 2X or 3X or 4X or 5X or even 6X the number of cores and threads will be a better approximation of the case when we test and analyses with fewer threads an fewer cores with USL methodology." I i will make you feel when if the serial part of the Amdahl's law is bigger and the system makes the chance higher to escape the contention, so if the parallel part of the Amdahl's law is variable that makes you more escape contention at fewer cores and fewer threads by wich you test with the USL methodology using nonlinear regression, this means that there is a much higher chance that system is organized in such a manner that the next steps at 2X and 3X and 4X to nX the number of cores and number of threads will be the right approximation , this is like probability and there is a much higher chance to happen and this makes the forecasting of scalability of USL methodology open, that means that you can forecast scalability effectively with USL methodology and that means that USL methology is a great and amazing tool ! But if the serial part of the Amdahl's equation is bigger, there is more chance to hit the contention with fewer cores and fewer threads when you test and analyses with USL methodology, so this will allow USL methodology to forecast farther scalability, even if the parallel part of the Amdahl's law is variable there is a lower chance from the empirical performance data to escape the contention , so when there is a lower chance to espace contention , so the nonlinear regression of USL will hit the contention and thus will be able to predict with a good approximation the scalability. But when the serial part of the Amdahl's law is smaller, that means that the chance is higher to escape the contention when we test and analyses with fewer threads an fewer cores with USL methodology, so this will allow USL methodology to forecast farther scalability. So in my opinion USL methodology is able to forecast farther scalability and is a success and is a great and amazing tool ! You have seen me, in this post, giving a proof about the USL methodology that it works.. But i think we can be confident with the USL methodology from Dr. Gunther , because Dr. Gunther is an expert that knows what he is doing, so i think USL methodology is working well and it is a great tool that can predict scalability. Here is the website of the Dr. Gunther the author of USL methodology. http://www.perfdynamics.com/ And read here about it: http://www.perfdynamics.com/Manifesto/USLscalability.html I have included the 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables of my programs inside the zip file to easy the job for you. You can download my USL programs version 3.0 with the source code from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Apr 18 09:36AM -0700 Hello... Read more, it is a happy day ! I will make more precise my proof that the USL methodology works ! If the serial part of the Amdahl's equation is bigger, there is more chance to hit the contention with fewer cores and fewer threads when you test and analyses with USL methodology, so this will allow USL methodology to forecast farther scalability, even if the parallel part of the Amdahl's law is variable there is a lower chance from the empirical performance data to escape the contention , so when there is a lower chance to espace contention , so the nonlinear regression of USL will hit the contention and thus will be able to predict with a good approximation the scalability. If the serial part of the Amdahl's equation is bigger and system makes the chance higher to escape the contention when we test and analyses with fewer threads an fewer cores with USL methodology, that means that the chance is higher that the next step with 2X or 3X or 4X or 5X or even 6X the number of cores and threads will be a better approximation of the case when we test and analyses with fewer threads an fewer cores with USL methodology. But when the serial part of the Amdahl's law is smaller, that means that the chance is higher to escape the contention when we test and analyses with fewer threads an fewer cores with USL methodology, so this will allow USL methodology to forecast farther scalability. So in my opinion USL methodology is able to forecast farther scalability and is a success and is a great and amazing tool ! You have seen me, in this post, giving a proof about the USL methodology that it works.. But i think we can be confident with the USL methodology from Dr. Gunther , because Dr. Gunther is an expert that knows what he is doing, so i think USL methodology is working well and it is a great tool that can predict scalability. Here is the website of the Dr. Gunther the author of USL methodology. http://www.perfdynamics.com/ And read here about it: http://www.perfdynamics.com/Manifesto/USLscalability.html I have included the 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables of my programs inside the zip file to easy the job for you. You can download my USL programs version 3.0 with the source code from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Apr 18 10:26AM -0700 On 4/18/2016 9:36 AM, Ramine wrote: > part of the Amdahl's law is variable there is a lower chance from > the empirical performance data to escape the contention , so when there > is a lower chance to espace contention , so the nonlinear regression I mean here: escape, not espace. |
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Apr 18 09:17AM -0700 Hello.... Here is my contributions of my USL programs.. I have first implemented a solver for my USL program that is polynomial regression, this solver must make the a0 coefficient of the mathematical series to 0, but this solver is not so efficient as my other solver that i have implemented that is nonlinear regression using the simplex method of of Nelder and Mead as a function minimization, this nonlinear solver that i have implemented works perfectly and is more efficient than the solver that uses polynomial regression, also my contribution is my USL programs that is called usl_graph that provides you with a more interractive graphical chart that permit you to optimize more the criterion of the cost, i think that the other R package is less powerful on this option. Also in my USL programs i have calculated and feed my nonlinear solver with partial derivatives of the USL equation: C(N) = N/(1 + α (N − 1) + β N (N − 1)) I have calculated the partial derivative with respect to α of the above USL equation, and i have calculated the partial derivative with respect to β of the above USL equation, and the two partial derivatives must be given to my nonlinear solver that uses the simplex method of of Nelder and Mead as a function minimization. Please try my USL programs because they are working great and they predict scalability ! I have included the 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables of my programs inside the zip file to easy the job for you. You can download my USL programs version 3.0 with the source code from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Apr 18 09:01AM -0700 Hello.. You have seen me, in my previous post, giving a more intuitive proof about the USL methodology that it works.. But i think we can be confident with the USL methodology from Dr. Gunther , because Dr. Gunther is an expert that knows what he is doing, so i think USL methodology is working well and it is a great tool that can predict scalability. Here is the website of the Dr. Gunther the author of USL methodology. http://www.perfdynamics.com/ And read here about it: http://www.perfdynamics.com/Manifesto/USLscalability.html You can download my USL programs version 3.0 with the source code from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
Ramine <ramine@1.1>: Apr 18 08:55AM -0700 Hello, I think i have found the solution .... Here is the proof that USL methodology succeed to forecast farther scalability... If the serial part of the Amdahl's equation is bigger, there is more chance to hit the contention with fewer cores and fewer threads when you test and analyses with USL methodology, so this will allow USL methodology to forecast farther scalability. If the serial part of the Amdahl's equation is bigger and system system makes the chance higher to escape the contention when we test and analyses with fewer threads an fewer cores with USL methodology, that means that the chance is higher that the next step with 2X or 3X or 4X the number of cores and threads will be a better approximation of the case when we test and analyses with fewer threads an fewer cores with USL methodology. But when the serial part of the Amdahl's law is smaller, that means that the chance is higher to escape the contention when we test and analyses with fewer threads an fewer cores with USL methodology, so this will allow USL methodology to forecast farther scalability. So from this, we can affirm that USL methodology can forecast farther up to 4X or 5X the maximum number of cores of the performance data.. I have included the 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables of my programs inside the zip file to easy the job for you. You can download my USL programs version 3.0 with the source code from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment