- Reverse Iteration Fractal Encryption... - 2 Updates
"Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid>: Jul 03 12:36AM -0700 On 2/21/2016 1:38 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > Original idea by Juaquin Anderson in the comments of the > following thread: [...] Here is pretty neat projection to the integer plane that really increases storage efficiency: Reverse Fractal Encryption 1d Integer Plane: https://xp-dev.com/svn/FractalCodes/trunk |
"Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid>: Jul 03 01:09AM -0700 On 2/21/2016 1:38 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > Original idea by Juaquin Anderson in the comments of the > following thread: [...] > What do you think about the code? Is it crap? > ;^) > Thank you all. Well, it does seem to be vulnerable to known plaintext attack, Eve is smart with many spies. I think a single point is hard, well if I sent a shi% load of them, then Eve's tap will just plot them and get visually close to the secret key, comprised of a single complex number and an origin point that is random for each ciphertext. Still, Eve should not get naked points from reverse iteration. The should be hidden. Encrypting random bytes, and using entropy from forward iteration will help. Also, radically increasing the key space with several (c)'s and random IV's and direct hiding of the points. Also, we have not even got into zooming, and the effects it casts. Yes we have a single (c) in the secret key, but, we can add a zoom level.... This increases key space right off the bat. Any other ideas? I do not think this is totally doomed. |
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment