- A more correct view of morality - 1 Update
- Immigration is like Artificial intelligence(AI).. - 1 Update
- I invite you to look at this interesting video - 1 Update
- About compassion and respect - 1 Update
- What is also the difference between animals and humans ? - 1 Update
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 24 08:58PM -0400 Hello.................. A more correct view of morality: Please read my following reasoning carefully.. Morality is interpreted by communism as being more ideal morality, this is the defect of communism, ideal morality belongs to the set of a priori pure moral of the philosopher Kant, but this ideal morality if applied today it causes problems, Class Struggle of communism is inferred from Ideal morality and thus from a priori pure moral, this violence of Class Struggle of communism is the consequence also of compassion, because communism wants by compassion to reduce social Darwinism by using violence of Class Struggle as a tool , but this way of Class Struggle is understood by empirical moral as being too problematic to realize because it causes extremism and violence, so Class Struggle of communism is too much violence that must be avoided. So a more correct definition of morality must be a mixture of guidance of moral and a priori pure moral and empirical moral.. About the essence of philosophy I am still doing in front of you logical reasoning and philosophy.. A logical reasoning can say: If we are suffering and has difficulty with surviving, and to avoid suffering and be able to survive, we have to dominate the others to suffer less and be able to survive. This is also morality because morality is inferred from empirical moral. But this was morality of the past that was living in extremely bad or bad conditions that has concluded with this logical reasoning to enslave others such as black africans. But today empirical moral constrains this logical reasoning above with the balance of powers and counter-powers from where we have also to infer morality, so please reread carefully what i have said about morality: Here is how i decompose morality: 1- The guidance of morality 2- All of a priori pure moral 3- Empirical moral First, there is the guidance of morality that is part of a priori pure moral, here is what i have said about it: My wisdom is also inferred from philosophy.. The philosopher Kant has defined morality like a composition of pure moral and empirical moral, so then morality is dynamic, not static. As a proof please read this about the philosopher Kant and you have to understand it well: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-hume-morality/ But me, i have spoken about pure morality as being happiness like a reference that is the goal that guides our actions and philosophies by saying this: -- The noumenal world of pure morality is a consequence of the essence of beauty and purity and happiness, this essence of beauty and purity and happiness causes the essence of respect that is like the essence of law that compensate by beautifulness for the awfulness of this world, so pure morality is the light and it attracts us and it guides us also because the goal of pure morality is the goal of philosophy and this goal is happiness, but pure morality has attained its goal that is happiness because of the essence of philosophy, because pure morality is happiness, so we must respect it and fight for it with wisdom, you have to have done philosophy like me to understand it correctly. -- Because morality is composed of a priori pure moral and empirical moral..But a priori pure moral knows what is the ideal of justice and the ideal of happiness and the ideal of purity and the ideal of beauty.. and this essence is the consequence of our essence that is capable of knowing this essence, and as you have noticed i have also defined pure morality as happiness, and i have said that pure morality has attained its goal that is happiness, i mean that those ideals of justice and happiness and purity and beauty have been attained by the noumenal world and our thoughts and this has allowed us to be guided better and this is the light that attracts us towards a better world, so we must respect it and fight for it with wisdom. I have also said about the guidance of morality this: And how can we be more civilized ? I have done philosophy.. We have to measure it easily to know about it.. Science in fact is part of morality, but science alone as morality is corruption of morality, because science is also performance and power that dictates to survive better, so then it dictates to neglect the weakers among us, so then this is corruption of morality that permit us to measure corruption of morality and thus to measure civilization, but i repeat that science is part of morality , because performance and power of science that solves our problems is also good, so this good is part of morality, and we can measure civilization and morality by the degree of the variable that is suffering, and you will measure morality by the Ideal of justice and ideal of happiness that are part of our essence, and that permit us to measure morality or measure civilization, And empirical moral constrain performance and power to not neglect the variables of compassion and respect and love because neglecting them causes violence and/or extremism and/or desorder, and this permit us also to measure morality or measure civilization. This is how we can measure morality and measure civilization. So we have to be careful to not repeat foolishness of the past. The ideal of justice and ideal of happiness.. If you say that this life is not fair and juste, that's not a measure, because you have to measure the degree of suffering and the degree of responsability, that means that justice must constrain happiness, but justice must be constrained by responsability too, but how can we constrain justice by responsability ? responsability can be interpreted being principles of communism or being principles of social democracy etc. so the the degree of tolerance is also a variable that influence responsability, so if we are more tolerance we can refuse the principles of communism because communism is a kind of justice that is too extreme that can cause extremism and violence, so the tolerance of social democracy or the tolerance of social Liberalism are more apt to not cause extremism and violence and social democracy or social Liberalism knows how to tune compassion and love and respect so that to be decent compassion and love and respect , and so that to not cause extremism and violence and desorder too. Second, there is a priori pure moral that we infer from reason. Third, there is empirical moral, and here is what i have said about it: About morality.. You will say that morality is morality, we can know it also by feeling it.. But applying morality must be dealt with with wisdom and rationality and logic.. What says philosophy(read the philosopher Kant) ? that morality is a composition of a priori pure moral and empirical moral.. So the action of knowing morality by feeling it, is not sufficient, because it's necessary to infer and apply empirical moral, but is it a corruption of morality ? since laws are also morality and science is also morality because we are ruled by optimization of science also, this is a serious subject, and you are in front of the very important part of morality that is empirical moral, because morality must be inferred from powers and counter-powers, this is a weakness of morality, but what is amazing is that today we are lucky that morality is not so bad, because read what i have written to understand my views: But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce morality with laws, but morality is not something easy , because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality is inferred also from empirical moral that is also from power and counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is different, we are getting world stability from the power and the counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we have the counter-power of the consumers confidence index, and this creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consumer confidence index internationally and locally. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 24 08:28PM -0400 Hello.................. Immigration is like Artificial intelligence(AI).. I have done artificial intelligence with PSO and Deep Learning... So if you are thinking like scientists, you will recognize that immigration is like artificial intelligence, immigration is not an exact calculation that must attain a global maximum, immigration is like PSO in artificial intelligence also, you can not tune it exactly, but you can enhance it by allowing more exploration , it is like artificial intelligence of AlphaGO that has added intuitiveness with a function value that returns probabilities that has more chance to win, so immigration is based on usefulness (even if we allow immigration based on human rights) and usefulness of immigration is not set as the global maximum of usefulness, but is more optimized with like heuristics that search for a better optimization, it is like an heuristic in artificial intelligence of PSO that uses exploration to better optimize, so immigration is not set as arabs has to be as beautiful as white europeans , but optimization of immigration of today has to fulfil the goal of economic growth and economic efficiency and/or social system efficiency and/or to be able to give jobs to the right persons, this is how works USA and this is how works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into consideration human rights. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 24 07:29PM -0400 Hello........ I invite you to look at this interesting video: Google's Great AI Awakening: We didn't even know we hired the best AI scientists in Google https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynZ8_CFRDgE Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 24 06:08PM -0400 Hello.............. About compassion and respect An inferior mind will say that compassion and respect are in accordance with the guidance of morality that is happiness that is the goal of philosophy and it's in accordance with a priori pure moral, but this is not sufficient, you have to apply empirical moral to tune better morality taking into account the guidance of morality to better avoid corruption of morality that hurts. Please read my following political philosophy that explain it(i have just corrected some typos in it): What is also the difference between animals and humans ? The back-bones of civilization is morality Morality gets us more organized than animals, and being more organized is being more smart than animals and it is being more secure than animals and it's being more powerful than animals.. This is why i am talking morality relating it to politics.. Please read again my policial philosophy to understand well from where is inferred compassion and love and respect and how to tune compassion and love and respect to be more and better organized.. About civilization and politics now.. I was just thinking right now and i have come to an interesting subject... If you ask me a question like this: Amine, are you in politics for centrists or are you for leftists or are you for rightists or are you for far-rightists ? This question is very important.. Now to answer this question i will do it by logical simplification, here is how: Why have we to be more civilized ? This question is very very important, and what is the back-bones of civilization ? it's morality, morality does comprise a priori pure moral and empirical moral.. Now morality is related to the political philosophy.. Morality is also political philosophy and political philosophy is also morality. Now you have to know how to tune morality in accordance with a priori pure moral and empirical moral.. Immigration is also morality, and you have to know how to tune morality to be able to tune immigration.. And compassion is also morality, but you have to be able to tune correctly compassion to be able to be more organized and more secure to avoid extremism and violence, because lack of compassion causes violence and extremism. But how to tune love and compassion and respect ? Here is my political philosophy that explained it: Here is my political model that i have just extended and refined more, please read it to understand my views of my model: What must be the game of politics of today ? You have seen me writing my political philosophy as an intellectual.. I am an arab from Morocco that lives in Quebec Canada. I am a decent and honest person, and morality is the reference of my actions.. So enough talk about me.. Now about the question above: What must be the game of politics of today ? Contrary to politics of domination of the past, today politics must be organized in such a way that it takes into account the powers and counter-powers, because from the powers and counter-powers, empirical moral is inferred, and because morality is a priori pure moral and empiriral moral, so this must be clear in your mind, this is why you have seen me taking into account empirical moral, this is necessary today to avoid for example a suicidal politics such as those of neo-nazis and neo-nazism.. neo-nazism is like nihilism , because its politic is a politic of domination , and this politic of domination of neo-nazism bring us directly to confrontations with weapons of mass destruction, so neo-nazism is not in accordance with empirical moral that wants to play smartly, and by taking consumerism into account , consumerism that causes compassion and respect, so that causes security and stability. So then hope you have understood what i am talking about. About our beloved arabs... I am learning you how to be smart.. Why am i saying our beloved arabs ? This is how you have to behave to attract confidence so that to higher consumer confidence index in you, it's like playing chess, you have to be capable of making smart moves on the chess, but is it negativity ? no it isn't negativity, because consumerism causes compassion and respect to be able to higher consumer confidence index internationally, and consumerism causes investment on third-world countries , this is the game today, you have to think big like that to be able to share the economic market of arabs and to sell more on the economic market of arabs, that's the same for africans, so this new conception and perception that looks like Fordism is the reality of capitalism an Liberalism of today, and why arabs will let you share there market and sell on there local market? because the old model of extremist nationalism is no more, because read the following proof: "The economic models developed by the development economists of the 1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. " by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank. Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english, because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco my country: http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha And how to provoke and bring quality to the system ? That's really a good question ! Now you have seen me talking in my previous posts about the mechanisms that provoke and bring more quality to the system, those mechanisms are the natural consequence of efficient thinking and thinking bigger, and efficient thinking must be based on a new conception and perception of the world, this perception and conception must provoke and bring more quality , and you have really seen me saying that competitiveness must be seen as a good sport, not as violence, , so you have to be sportive and think sportive to enhance competitiveness, this kind of change in our perception and conception bring more security, like when i have said that consumerism is constrained by the fact that it must know how to tune compassion and love and respect towards consumers to higher consumer confidence index, that's all beautiful, because it is a balance of powers that provoke and bring more quality, like when i have said also that you have to know how to not neglect compassion and love and respect to not cause extremism and violence in the system, that's also a counter-power that provoke and bring more quality, this is all about the balance of powers and counter-powers that provoke and bring more quality to the system, this is why you have finally seen me saying the following to you: About dictatorship and communism The problem with those is the problem of the past, because there is a necessity to provoke and bring quality with the introduction of new mechanisms, like the mechanisms of the counter-power of consumerism and consumer confidence index, and like the mechanism of the power of democracy, and like the mechanism of the counter-power of the financial and bank institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and this creates more quality and a world stability, this balance of powers ensure us of more stability and more quality and more security, this is the weakness of dictatorship and communism, they lack some of or all of those mechanisms that bring more quality. Capitalism is changing from commodity capital to intellectual capital. Intellectual capital is where you will have more money and it is where you will become more rich and prosperous. See the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qYmZPP4AO8 About capitalism.. If you say , to become rich you must work hard. In capitalism that's not true, because Intellectual giftedness can make you rich faster without working hard and/or without suffering. That's a principle in capitalism, and this condition is authorized by capitalism because this is how you become rich as a nation and this is how you can take taxes from the rich. About jews.. The history of jews is related to capitalism, Hitler has attacked jews because he has attacked capitalism. But i don't think that Hitler was right.. Because of Intellectual giftedness of jews, so jews can become rich faster without working hard and without suffering.. but we have not to hate this, because it is a principle of capitalism that is important, because it is how we become rich as a nation, and because read again: About capitalism.. If you say , to become rich you must work hard. In capitalism that's not true, because Intellectual giftedness can make you rich faster without working hard and/or without suffering. That's a principle in capitalism, and this condition is authorized by capitalism because this is how you become rich as a nation and this is how you can take taxes from the rich, and also because Intellectual elites has to sacrifice for money to maximize better the benefit of science and development. I will add the following factor to my model: Economic integration with others and also economic investment render the world more stable and more peaceful and more secure, and because consumerism has to guide governance and consumerism is also the consequence of compassion and respect, because to not hurt consumer confidence index you have to know how to be compassion and respect. This is the solution of the problem between Israel and arab countries, they must have more economic integration and more economic investment between them to be more peace and stability. Please read again the rest of my model: With a Top-down approach i have come to an important subject: I have said that: Other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consumer confidence index internationally and locally. This is an important factor to be able to tune well the political philosophy that must guide governance, you have also to think governance by knowing how to tune economic investing into the third world countries, this is mandatory, to be more precise i will say that you have to know that like Fordism, consumerism has also to guide our political philosophy, and consumerism is a consequence of respect and compassion, so this is very serious, and the essence of America is constructed on this fact, so adding this principle to my model will get you on the right path, here is the rest of my model that i have enhanced: About extremist nationalism and communism.. Extremist nationalism like the far-right or neo-nazi political parties is an archaic thinking that causes violence and extremism and instability, communism is the same, so we have to be wiser and understand that this kind of extremism has also to be avoided by knowing the following: "The economic models developed by the development economists of the 1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. " by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank. Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english, because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco my country: http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha And i have said that efficient thinking is not thinking small.. Efficient thinking is thinking bigger.. You have to think bigger to be able to survive better.. But thinking bigger is not suicidal thinking that causes suffering to the people, suicidal thinking is a nihilist thinking that is not efficient thinking that thinks bigger and that solves problems, so be capable and be responsable and be wise, being wiser is also taking into account the right variables and factors that enhance your living conditions and the living conditions of your children and the people.. But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce morality with laws, but morality is not something easy , because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality is inferred also from empirical moral that is also from power and counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is different, we are getting world stability from the power and the counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we have the counter-power of the consumers confidence index, and this creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consumer confidence index internationally and locally. And about immigration: Virility and usefulness We have to do more philosophy.. There is some of you who define virility as being courageous or violent.. But this is not the right way to define virility.. You have to define it to know it: Virility is maturity and also it is intelligence and it is money and it is knowledge and it is efficiency etc. Virility is not just being violent or being courageous.. Now can we make this criterion of virility the criterion at how we have to be selected as an immigrant ? I don't think it is the right way.. Because to be accepted as an immigrant we have to be categorized by the criterion of usefulness, this is optimization of today, so to fulfil the goal of economic growth and economic efficiency and to be able to give jobs to the right persons, we have to think by the criterion of usefulness, this is how works USA and this is how works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into consideration human rights. Knowledge changes your perception.. But quality of knowledge is also very important to set it right.. To overcome many constraints you have to know how to tune some variables, like you have to know how to define usefulness, and this is the weakness of neo-nazis like ideologies, today optimization is defined by the criterion of usefulness, and usefulness is not that arabs have to be as beautiful as white europeans, this is the old way of thinking, so usefulness to conform to the standards of today that take into account efficiency of economy has been defined differently than the |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 24 04:45PM -0400 Hello............... What is also the difference between animals and humans ? The back-bones of civilization is morality Morality gets us more organized than animals, and being more organized is being more smart than animals and it is being more secure than animals and it's being more powerful than animals.. This is why i am talking morality relating it to politics.. Please read again my policial philosophy to understand well from where is infered compassion and love and respect and how to tune compassion and love and respect to be more and better organized.. About civilization and politics now.. I was just thinking right now and i have come to an interesting subject... If you ask me a question like this: Amine, are you in politics for centrists or are you for leftists or are you for rightists or are you for far-rightists ? This question is very important.. Now to answer this question i will do it by logical simplification, here is how: Why have we to be more civilized ? This question is very very important, and what is the back-bones of civilization ? it's morality, morality does comprise a priori pure moral and empirical moral.. Now morality is related to the political philosophy.. Morality is also political philosophy and political philosophy is also morality. Now you have to know how to tune morality in accordance with a priori pure moral and empirical moral.. Immigration is also morality, and you have to know how to tune morality to be able to tune immigration.. And compassion is also morality, but you have to be able to tune correctly compassion to be able to be more organized and more secure to avoid extremism and violence, because lack of compassion causes violence and extremism. But how to tune love and compassion and respect ? Here is my political philosophy that explained it: Here is my political model that i have just extended and refined more, please read it to understand my views of my model: What must be the game of politics of today ? You have seen me writing my political philosophy as an intellectual.. I am an arab from Morocco that lives in Quebec Canada. I am a decent and honest person, and morality is the reference of my actions.. So enough talk about me.. Now about the question above: What must be the game of politics of today ? Contrary to politics of domination of the past, today politics must be organized in such a way that it takes into account the powers and counter-powers, because from the powers and counter-powers, empirical moral is inferred, and because morality is a priori pure moral and empiriral moral, so this must be clear in your mind, this is why you have seen me taking into account empirical moral, this is necessary today to avoid for example a suicidal politics such as those of neo-nazis and neo-nazism.. neo-nazism is like nihilism , because its politic is a politic of domination , and this politic of domination of neo-nazism bring us directly to confrontations with weapons of mass destruction, so neo-nazism is not in accordance with empirical moral that wants to play smartly, and by taking consumerism into account , consumerism that causes compassion and respect, so that causes security and stability. So then hope you have understood what i am talking about. About our beloved arabs... I am learning you how to be smart.. Why am i saying our beloved arabs ? This is how you have to behave to attract confidence so that to higher consumer confidence index in you, it's like playing chess, you have to be capable of making smart moves on the chess, but is it negativity ? no it isn't negativity, because consumerism causes compassion and respect to be able to higher consumer confidence index internationally, and consumerism causes investment on third-world countries , this is the game today, you have to think big like that to be able to share the economic market of arabs and to sell more on the economic market of arabs, that's the same for africans, so this new conception and perception that looks like Fordism is the reality of capitalism an Liberalism of today, and why arabs will let you share there market and sell on there local market? because the old model of extremist nationalism is no more, because read the following proof: "The economic models developed by the development economists of the 1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. " by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank. Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english, because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco my country: http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha And how to provoke and bring quality to the system ? That's really a good question ! Now you have seen me talking in my previous posts about the mechanisms that provoke and bring more quality to the system, those mechanism are the natural consequence of efficient thinking and thinking bigger, and efficient thinking must be based on a new conception and perception of the world, this perception and conception must provoke and bring more quality , and you have really seen me saying that competitiveness must be seen as a good sport, not as violence, , so you have to be sportive and think sportive to enhance competitiveness, this kind of change in our perception and conception bring more security, like when i have said that consumerism is constrained by the fact that it must know how to tune compassion and love and respect towards consumers to higher consumer confidence index, that's all beautiful, because it is a balance of powers that provoke and bring more quality, like when i have said also that you have to know how to not neglect compassion and love and respect to not cause extremism and violence in the system, that's also a counter-power that provoke and bring more quality, this is all about the balance of powers and counter-powers that provoke and bring more quality to the system, this is why you have finally seen me saying the following to you: About dictatorship and communism The problem with those is the problem of the past, because there is a necessity to provoke and bring quality with the introduction of new mechanisms, like the mechanisms of the counter-power of consumerism and consumer confidence index, and like the mechanism of the power of democracy, and like the mechanism of the counter-power of the financial and bank institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and this creates more quality and a world stability, this balance of powers ensure us of more stability and more quality and more security, this is the weakness of dictatorship and communism, they lack some of or all of those mechanisms that bring more quality. Capitalism is changing from commodity capital to intellectual capital. Intellectual capital is where you will have more money and it is where you will become more rich and prosperous. See the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qYmZPP4AO8 About capitalism.. If you say , to become rich you must work hard. In capitalism that's not true, because Intellectual giftedness can make you rich faster without working hard and/or without suffering. That's a principle in capitalism, and this condition is authorized by capitalism because this is how you become rich as a nation and this is how you can take taxes from the rich. About jews.. The history of jews is related to capitalism, Hitler has attacked jews because he has attacked capitalism. But i don't think that Hitler was right.. Because of Intellectual giftedness of jews, so jews can become rich faster without working hard and without suffering.. but we have not to hate this, because it is a principle of capitalism that is important, because it is how we become rich as a nation, and because read again: About capitalism.. If you say , to become rich you must work hard. In capitalism that's not true, because Intellectual giftedness can make you rich faster without working hard and/or without suffering. That's a principle in capitalism, and this condition is authorized by capitalism because this is how you become rich as a nation and this is how you can take taxes from the rich, and also because Intellectual elites has to sacrifice for money to maximize better the benefit of science and development. I will add the following factor to my model: Economic integration with others and also economic investment render the world more stable and more peaceful and more secure, and because consumerism has to guide governance and consumerism is also the consequence of compassion and respect, because to not hurt consumer confidence index you have to know how to be compassion and respect. This is the solution of the problem between Israel and arab countries, they must have more economic integration and more economic investment between them to be more peace and stability. Please read again the rest of my model: With a Top-down approach i have come to an important subject: I have said that: Other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consumer confidence index internationally and locally. This is an important factor to be able to tune well the political philosophy that must guide governance, you have also to think governance by knowing how to tune economic investing into the third world countries, this is mandatory, to be more precise i will say that you have to know that like Fordism, consumerism has also to guide our political philosophy, and consumerism is a consequence of respect and compassion, so this is very serious, and the essence of America is constructed on this fact, so adding this principle to my model will get you on the right path, here is the rest of my model that i have enhanced: About extremist nationalism and communism.. Extremist nationalism like the far-right or neo-nazi political parties is an archaic thinking that causes violence and extremism and instability, communism is the same, so we have to be wiser and understand that this kind of extremism has also to be avoided by knowing the following: "The economic models developed by the development economists of the 1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. " by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank. Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english, because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco my country: http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha And i have said that efficient thinking is not thinking small.. Efficient thinking is thinking bigger.. You have to think bigger to be able to survive better.. But thinking bigger is not suicidal thinking that causes suffering to the people, suicidal thinking is a nihilist thinking that is not efficient thinking that thinks bigger and that solves problems, so be capable and be responsable and be wise, being wiser is also taking into account the right variables and factors that enhance your living conditions and the living conditions of your children and the people.. But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce morality with laws, but morality is not something easy , because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality is inferred also from empirical moral that is also from power and counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is different, we are getting world stability from the power and the counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we have the counter-power of the consumers confidence index, and this creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consumer confidence index internationally and locally. And about immigration: Virility and usefulness We have to do more philosophy.. There is some of you who define virility as being courageous or violent.. But this is not the right way to define virility.. You have to define it to know it: Virility is maturity and also it is intelligence and it is money and it is knowledge and it is efficiency etc. Virility is not just being violent or being courageous.. Now can we make this criterion of virility the criterion at how we have to be selected as an immigrant ? I don't think it is the right way.. Because to be accepted as an immigrant we have to be categorized by the criterion of usefulness, this is optimization of today, so to fulfil the goal of economic growth and economic efficiency and to be able to give jobs to the right persons, we have to think by the criterion of usefulness, this is how works USA and this is how works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into consideration human rights. Knowledge changes your perception.. But quality of knowledge is also very important to set it right.. To overcome many constraints you have to know how to tune some variables, like you have to know how to define usefulness, and this is the weakness of neo-nazis like ideologies, today optimization is defined by the criterion of usefulness, and usefulness is not that arabs have to be as beautiful as white europeans, this is the old way of thinking, so usefulness to conform to the standards of today that take into account efficiency of economy has been defined differently than the neo-nazis kind of thinking, so we have to adapt , because USA and Canada have to optimize there economies taking into account many constraints, because also usefulness is constrained also by contraints and this is why USA and Canada are getting more clever at defining usefulness and usefulness of immigrants to better optimize there economies, so i am calling to all of you to adapt to the reality of today, because the past was the past, and today is today, so please adapt yourself ! And more about the criterion of |
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment