Thursday, May 25, 2017

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 5 updates in 5 topics

rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 24 08:58PM -0400

Hello..................
 
 
A more correct view of morality:
 
Please read my following reasoning carefully..
 
Morality is interpreted by communism as being more ideal morality, this
is the defect of communism, ideal morality belongs to the set of a
priori pure moral of the philosopher Kant, but this ideal morality if
applied today it causes problems, Class Struggle of communism is
inferred from Ideal morality and thus from a priori pure moral, this
violence of Class Struggle of communism is the consequence also
of compassion, because communism wants by compassion to reduce social
Darwinism by using violence of Class Struggle as a tool , but this way
of Class Struggle is understood by empirical moral as being
too problematic to realize because it causes extremism and violence,
so Class Struggle of communism is too much violence that must be avoided.
 
So a more correct definition of morality must be a mixture of guidance
of moral and a priori pure moral and empirical moral..
 
About the essence of philosophy
 
I am still doing in front of you logical reasoning and philosophy..
 
A logical reasoning can say:
 
If we are suffering and has difficulty with surviving, and to avoid
suffering and be able to survive, we have to dominate the others to
suffer less and be able to survive.
 
This is also morality because morality is inferred from empirical moral.
 
But this was morality of the past that was living in extremely bad or
bad conditions that has concluded with this logical reasoning to enslave
others such as black africans.
 
But today empirical moral constrains this logical reasoning above with
the balance of powers and counter-powers from where we have also to
infer morality, so please reread carefully what i have said about morality:
 
Here is how i decompose morality:
 
1- The guidance of morality
 
2- All of a priori pure moral
 
3- Empirical moral
 
 
First, there is the guidance of morality that is part of a priori pure
moral, here is what i have said about it:
 
My wisdom is also inferred from philosophy..
 
The philosopher Kant has defined morality like a composition
of pure moral and empirical moral, so then morality is
dynamic, not static.
 
As a proof please read this about the philosopher Kant and you have
to understand it well:
 
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-hume-morality/
 
But me, i have spoken about pure morality as being happiness
like a reference that is the goal that guides our actions
and philosophies by saying this:
 
--
The noumenal world of pure morality is a consequence of the essence of
beauty and purity and happiness, this essence of beauty and purity and
happiness causes the essence of respect that is like the essence of law
that compensate by beautifulness for the awfulness of this world, so
pure morality is the light and it attracts us and it guides us also
because the goal of pure morality is the goal of philosophy and this
goal is happiness, but pure morality has attained its goal that is
happiness because of the essence of philosophy, because pure morality is
happiness, so we must respect it and fight for it with wisdom, you have
to have done philosophy like me to understand it correctly.
--
 
Because morality is composed of a priori pure moral and empirical
moral..But a priori pure moral knows what is the ideal of justice and
the ideal of happiness and the ideal of purity and the ideal of
beauty.. and this essence is the consequence of our essence
that is capable of knowing this essence, and as you have noticed i have
also defined pure morality as happiness, and i have said
that pure morality has attained its goal that is happiness,
i mean that those ideals of justice and happiness and purity and
beauty have been attained by the noumenal world and our thoughts and
this has allowed us to be guided better and this is the light that
attracts us towards a better world, so we must respect it and fight for
it with wisdom.
 
I have also said about the guidance of morality this:
 
And how can we be more civilized ?
 
I have done philosophy..
 
We have to measure it easily to know about it..
 
Science in fact is part of morality, but science alone as morality is
corruption of morality, because science is also performance and power
that dictates to survive better, so then it dictates to neglect the
weakers among us, so then this is corruption of morality that permit us
to measure corruption of morality and thus to measure civilization, but
i repeat that science is part of morality , because performance and
power of science that solves our problems is also good, so this good is
part of morality, and we can measure civilization and morality by the
degree of the variable that is suffering, and you will measure morality
by the Ideal of justice and ideal of happiness that are part of our
essence, and that permit us to measure morality or measure
civilization, And empirical moral constrain performance and power to
not neglect the variables of compassion and respect and love
because neglecting them causes violence and/or extremism
and/or desorder, and this permit us also to measure morality or measure
civilization.
 
This is how we can measure morality and measure civilization.
 
So we have to be careful to not repeat foolishness of the past.
 
The ideal of justice and ideal of happiness..
 
If you say that this life is not fair and juste, that's not a measure,
because you have to measure the degree of suffering and the degree
of responsability, that means that justice must constrain happiness,
but justice must be constrained by responsability too, but how can we
constrain justice by responsability ? responsability can be interpreted
being principles of communism or being principles of social democracy
etc. so the the degree of tolerance is also a variable that influence
responsability, so if we are more tolerance we can refuse the principles
of communism because communism is a kind of justice that
is too extreme that can cause extremism and violence, so the tolerance
of social democracy or the tolerance of social Liberalism are more apt
to not cause extremism and violence and social democracy or
social Liberalism knows how to tune compassion and love and respect so
that to be decent compassion and love and respect , and so that to not
cause extremism and violence and desorder too.
 
 
Second, there is a priori pure moral that we infer from reason.
 
Third, there is empirical moral, and here is what i have said about it:
 
About morality..
 
You will say that morality is morality, we can know it also by feeling it..
 
But applying morality must be dealt with with wisdom and rationality and
logic..
 
What says philosophy(read the philosopher Kant) ? that morality is a
composition of a priori pure moral and empirical moral..
 
So the action of knowing morality by feeling it, is not sufficient,
because it's necessary to infer and apply empirical moral, but is it a
corruption of morality ? since laws are also morality and science
is also morality because we are ruled by optimization of science also,
this is a serious subject, and you are in front of the very important
part of morality that is empirical moral, because morality must be
inferred from powers and counter-powers, this is a weakness of morality,
but what is amazing is that today we are lucky that
morality is not so bad, because read what i have written to
understand my views:
 
But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce
morality with laws, but morality is not something easy ,
because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality
is inferred also from empirical moral that is also from power and
counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is
not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is
different, we are getting world stability from the power and the
counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is
the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial
and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into
account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we
have the counter-power of the consumers confidence index, and this
creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic
systems by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other
than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like
mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more
organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and
extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning
compassion and respect right with social services and medical services
and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid
violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this
compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how
to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consumer confidence index
internationally and locally.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 24 08:28PM -0400

Hello..................
 
 
Immigration is like Artificial intelligence(AI)..
 
I have done artificial intelligence with PSO and Deep Learning...
 
So if you are thinking like scientists, you will recognize that
immigration is like artificial intelligence, immigration is
not an exact calculation that must attain a global maximum,
immigration is like PSO in artificial intelligence also, you
can not tune it exactly, but you can enhance it by allowing
more exploration , it is like artificial intelligence of AlphaGO
that has added intuitiveness with a function value that returns
probabilities that has more chance to win, so immigration
is based on usefulness (even if we allow immigration based
on human rights) and usefulness of immigration is not set
as the global maximum of usefulness, but is more optimized
with like heuristics that search for a better optimization,
it is like an heuristic in artificial intelligence of PSO that uses
exploration to better optimize, so immigration is not set as
arabs has to be as beautiful as white europeans , but optimization
of immigration of today has to fulfil the goal of economic growth and
economic efficiency and/or social system efficiency and/or to be able to
give jobs to the right persons, this is how works USA and this is how
works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into
consideration human rights.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 24 07:29PM -0400

Hello........
 
I invite you to look at this interesting video:
 
Google's Great AI Awakening: We didn't even know we hired the best AI
scientists in Google
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynZ8_CFRDgE
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 24 06:08PM -0400

Hello..............
 
 
About compassion and respect
 
An inferior mind will say that compassion and respect are
in accordance with the guidance of morality that is happiness that is
the goal of philosophy and it's in accordance with a priori pure moral,
but this is not sufficient, you have to apply empirical moral to
tune better morality taking into account the guidance of morality to
better avoid corruption of morality that hurts.
 
Please read my following political philosophy that explain it(i have
just corrected some typos in it):
 
What is also the difference between animals and humans ?
 
The back-bones of civilization is morality
 
Morality gets us more organized than animals, and being more organized
is being more smart than animals and it is being more secure than
animals and it's being more powerful than animals..
 
This is why i am talking morality relating it to politics..
 
Please read again my policial philosophy to understand well from
where is inferred compassion and love and respect and how to
tune compassion and love and respect to be more and better organized..
 
About civilization and politics now..
 
I was just thinking right now and i have come to an interesting subject...
 
 
If you ask me a question like this:
 
Amine, are you in politics for centrists or are you for leftists or are
you for rightists or are you for far-rightists ?
 
This question is very important..
 
Now to answer this question i will do it by logical simplification, here
is how:
 
Why have we to be more civilized ?
 
This question is very very important, and what is the back-bones of
civilization ? it's morality, morality does comprise a priori
pure moral and empirical moral..
 
Now morality is related to the political philosophy..
 
Morality is also political philosophy and political philosophy is also
morality.
 
Now you have to know how to tune morality in accordance with a priori
pure moral and empirical moral..
 
Immigration is also morality, and you have to know how to tune morality
to be able to tune immigration..
 
And compassion is also morality, but you have to be able to tune
correctly compassion to be able to be more organized and more
secure to avoid extremism and violence, because lack of compassion
causes violence and extremism.
 
But how to tune love and compassion and respect ?
 
Here is my political philosophy that explained it:
 
Here is my political model that i have just extended and refined more,
please read it to understand my views of my model:
 
What must be the game of politics of today ?
 
You have seen me writing my political philosophy as an intellectual..
 
I am an arab from Morocco that lives in Quebec Canada.
 
I am a decent and honest person, and morality is the reference of my
actions..
 
So enough talk about me..
 
Now about the question above:
 
What must be the game of politics of today ?
 
Contrary to politics of domination of the past, today politics
must be organized in such a way that it takes into account
the powers and counter-powers, because from the powers and
counter-powers, empirical moral is inferred, and because morality is
a priori pure moral and empiriral moral, so this must be clear
in your mind, this is why you have seen me taking into account
empirical moral, this is necessary today to avoid for example
a suicidal politics such as those of neo-nazis and neo-nazism..
neo-nazism is like nihilism , because its politic is
a politic of domination , and this politic of domination
of neo-nazism bring us directly to confrontations with weapons
of mass destruction, so neo-nazism is not in accordance with
empirical moral that wants to play smartly, and by taking consumerism
into account , consumerism that causes compassion and respect,
so that causes security and stability. So then hope you have
understood what i am talking about.
 
About our beloved arabs...
 
I am learning you how to be smart..
 
Why am i saying our beloved arabs ?
 
This is how you have to behave to attract confidence so that to higher
consumer confidence index in you, it's like playing chess, you have to
be capable of making smart moves on the chess, but is it negativity ?
no it isn't negativity, because consumerism causes compassion
and respect to be able to higher consumer confidence index
internationally, and consumerism causes investment on third-world
countries , this is the game today, you have to think big like that to
be able to share the economic market of arabs and to sell more on the
economic market of arabs, that's the same for africans, so this
new conception and perception that looks like Fordism is the
reality of capitalism an Liberalism of today, and why arabs
will let you share there market and sell on there local market?
because the old model of extremist nationalism is no more, because
read the following proof:
 
"The economic models developed by the development economists of the
1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be
losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic
development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the
development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. "
by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy
Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank.
 
Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english,
because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco
my country:
 
http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha
 
 
And how to provoke and bring quality to the system ?
 
That's really a good question !
 
Now you have seen me talking in my previous posts about the mechanisms
that provoke and bring more quality to the system, those mechanisms are
the natural consequence of efficient thinking and thinking bigger, and
efficient thinking must be based on a new conception and perception of
the world, this perception and conception must provoke and bring more
quality , and you have really seen me saying that competitiveness must
be seen as a good sport, not as violence, , so you have to be sportive
and think sportive to enhance competitiveness, this kind of change in
our perception and conception bring more security, like when i have said
that consumerism is constrained by the fact that it must know how to
tune compassion and love and respect towards consumers to higher
consumer confidence index, that's all beautiful, because it is a balance
of powers that provoke and bring more quality, like when i have said
also that you have to know how to not neglect compassion and love and
respect to not cause extremism and violence in the system, that's also a
counter-power that provoke and bring more quality, this is all
about the balance of powers and counter-powers that provoke
and bring more quality to the system, this is why you have finally
seen me saying the following to you:
 
About dictatorship and communism
 
The problem with those is the problem of the past, because there is
a necessity to provoke and bring quality with the introduction of new
mechanisms, like the mechanisms of the counter-power of consumerism and
consumer confidence index, and like the mechanism of the power of
democracy, and like the mechanism of the counter-power of the financial
and bank institutions that have there rating methodology that take into
account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and this
creates more quality and a world stability, this balance of powers
ensure us of more stability and more quality and more security, this is
the weakness of dictatorship and communism, they lack some of or all of
those mechanisms that bring more quality.
 
Capitalism is changing from commodity capital to intellectual capital.
 
Intellectual capital is where you will have more money and it is where
you will become more rich and prosperous.
 
 
See the following video:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qYmZPP4AO8
 
 
About capitalism..
 
If you say , to become rich you must work hard.
 
In capitalism that's not true, because Intellectual giftedness can make
you rich faster without working hard and/or without suffering. That's a
principle in capitalism, and this condition is authorized by capitalism
because this is how you become rich as a nation and this is how you can
take taxes from the rich.
 
About jews..
 
The history of jews is related to capitalism, Hitler has attacked
jews because he has attacked capitalism.
 
But i don't think that Hitler was right..
 
Because of Intellectual giftedness of jews, so jews can become rich
faster without working hard and without suffering.. but we have not to
hate this, because it is a principle of capitalism that is important,
because it is how we become rich as a nation, and because read again:
 
About capitalism..
 
 
If you say , to become rich you must work hard.
 
In capitalism that's not true, because Intellectual giftedness can make
you rich faster without working hard and/or without suffering. That's a
principle in capitalism, and this condition is authorized by capitalism
because this is how you become rich as a nation and this is how you can
take taxes from the rich, and also because Intellectual elites has to
sacrifice for money to maximize better the benefit of science and
development.
 
I will add the following factor to my model:
 
Economic integration with others and also economic investment render the
world more stable and more peaceful and more secure, and because
consumerism has to guide governance and consumerism is also the
consequence of compassion and respect, because to not hurt consumer
confidence index you have to know how to be compassion and respect. This
is the solution of the problem between Israel and arab countries, they
must have more economic integration and more economic investment between
them to be more peace and stability.
 
Please read again the rest of my model:
 
With a Top-down approach i have come to an important subject:
 
I have said that:
 
Other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to
not hurt consumer confidence index internationally and locally.
 
This is an important factor to be able to tune well the political
philosophy that must guide governance, you have also to think governance
by knowing how to tune economic investing into the third world
countries, this is mandatory, to be more precise i will say that you
have to know that like Fordism, consumerism has also to guide our
political philosophy, and consumerism is a consequence of respect and
compassion, so this is very serious, and the essence of America is
constructed on this fact, so adding this principle to my model will get
you on the right path, here is the rest of my model that i have enhanced:
 
About extremist nationalism and communism..
 
Extremist nationalism like the far-right or neo-nazi political parties
is an archaic thinking that causes violence and extremism and
instability, communism is the same, so we have to be wiser
and understand that this kind of extremism has also to be avoided
by knowing the following:
 
"The economic models developed by the development economists of the
1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be
losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic
development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the
development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. "
by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy
Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank.
 
Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english,
because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco
my country:
 
http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha
 
 
And i have said that efficient thinking is not thinking small..
 
Efficient thinking is thinking bigger..
 
You have to think bigger to be able to survive better..
 
But thinking bigger is not suicidal thinking that causes suffering to
the people, suicidal thinking is a nihilist thinking that is not
efficient thinking that thinks bigger and that solves problems, so be
capable and be responsable and be wise, being wiser is also taking into
account the right variables and factors that enhance your living
conditions and the living conditions of your children and the people..
 
But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce
morality with laws, but morality is not something easy ,
because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality
is inferred also from empirical moral that is also from power and
counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is
not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is
different, we are getting world stability from the power and the
counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is
the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial
and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into
account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we
have the counter-power of the consumers confidence index, and this
creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic
systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance,
other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like
mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more
organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and
extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning
compassion and respect right with social services and medical services
and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid
violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this
compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how
to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consumer confidence index
internationally and locally.
 
 
And about immigration:
 
Virility and usefulness
 
We have to do more philosophy..
 
There is some of you who define virility as being courageous or violent..
 
But this is not the right way to define virility..
 
You have to define it to know it:
 
Virility is maturity and also it is intelligence and it is
money and it is knowledge and it is efficiency etc.
 
Virility is not just being violent or being courageous..
 
Now can we make this criterion of virility the criterion
at how we have to be selected as an immigrant ?
 
I don't think it is the right way..
 
Because to be accepted as an immigrant we have to be categorized
by the criterion of usefulness, this is optimization of today,
so to fulfil the goal of economic growth and economic efficiency
and to be able to give jobs to the right persons, we have to think
by the criterion of usefulness, this is how works USA and this is
how works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into
consideration human rights.
 
Knowledge changes your perception..
 
But quality of knowledge is also very important to set it right..
 
To overcome many constraints you have to know how to tune some
variables, like you have to know how to define usefulness,
and this is the weakness of neo-nazis like ideologies,
today optimization is defined by the criterion of usefulness,
and usefulness is not that arabs have to be as beautiful as
white europeans, this is the old way of thinking, so
usefulness to conform to the standards of today that
take into account efficiency of economy has been defined
differently than the
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 24 04:45PM -0400

Hello...............
 
 
What is also the difference between animals and humans ?
 
The back-bones of civilization is morality
 
Morality gets us more organized than animals, and being more organized
is being more smart than animals and it is being more secure than
animals and it's being more powerful than animals..
 
This is why i am talking morality relating it to politics..
 
Please read again my policial philosophy to understand well from
where is infered compassion and love and respect and how to
tune compassion and love and respect to be more and better organized..
 
About civilization and politics now..
 
I was just thinking right now and i have come to an interesting subject...
 
 
If you ask me a question like this:
 
Amine, are you in politics for centrists or are you for leftists or are
you for rightists or are you for far-rightists ?
 
This question is very important..
 
Now to answer this question i will do it by logical simplification, here
is how:
 
Why have we to be more civilized ?
 
This question is very very important, and what is the back-bones of
civilization ? it's morality, morality does comprise a priori
pure moral and empirical moral..
 
Now morality is related to the political philosophy..
 
Morality is also political philosophy and political philosophy is also
morality.
 
Now you have to know how to tune morality in accordance with a priori
pure moral and empirical moral..
 
Immigration is also morality, and you have to know how to tune morality
to be able to tune immigration..
 
And compassion is also morality, but you have to be able to tune
correctly compassion to be able to be more organized and more
secure to avoid extremism and violence, because lack of compassion
causes violence and extremism.
 
But how to tune love and compassion and respect ?
 
Here is my political philosophy that explained it:
 
Here is my political model that i have just extended and refined more,
please read it to understand my views of my model:
 
What must be the game of politics of today ?
 
You have seen me writing my political philosophy as an intellectual..
 
I am an arab from Morocco that lives in Quebec Canada.
 
I am a decent and honest person, and morality is the reference of my
actions..
 
So enough talk about me..
 
Now about the question above:
 
What must be the game of politics of today ?
 
Contrary to politics of domination of the past, today politics
must be organized in such a way that it takes into account
the powers and counter-powers, because from the powers and
counter-powers, empirical moral is inferred, and because morality is
a priori pure moral and empiriral moral, so this must be clear
in your mind, this is why you have seen me taking into account
empirical moral, this is necessary today to avoid for example
a suicidal politics such as those of neo-nazis and neo-nazism..
neo-nazism is like nihilism , because its politic is
a politic of domination , and this politic of domination
of neo-nazism bring us directly to confrontations with weapons
of mass destruction, so neo-nazism is not in accordance with
empirical moral that wants to play smartly, and by taking consumerism
into account , consumerism that causes compassion and respect,
so that causes security and stability. So then hope you have
understood what i am talking about.
 
About our beloved arabs...
 
I am learning you how to be smart..
 
Why am i saying our beloved arabs ?
 
This is how you have to behave to attract confidence so that to higher
consumer confidence index in you, it's like playing chess, you have to
be capable of making smart moves on the chess, but is it negativity ?
no it isn't negativity, because consumerism causes compassion
and respect to be able to higher consumer confidence index
internationally, and consumerism causes investment on third-world
countries , this is the game today, you have to think big like that to
be able to share the economic market of arabs and to sell more on the
economic market of arabs, that's the same for africans, so this
new conception and perception that looks like Fordism is the
reality of capitalism an Liberalism of today, and why arabs
will let you share there market and sell on there local market?
because the old model of extremist nationalism is no more, because
read the following proof:
 
"The economic models developed by the development economists of the
1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be
losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic
development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the
development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. "
by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy
Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank.
 
Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english,
because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco
my country:
 
http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha
 
 
And how to provoke and bring quality to the system ?
 
That's really a good question !
 
Now you have seen me talking in my previous posts about the mechanisms
that provoke and bring more quality to the system, those mechanism are
the natural consequence of efficient thinking and thinking bigger, and
efficient thinking must be based on a new conception and perception of
the world, this perception and conception must provoke and bring more
quality , and you have really seen me saying that competitiveness must
be seen as a good sport, not as violence, , so you have to be sportive
and think sportive to enhance competitiveness, this kind of change in
our perception and conception bring more security, like when i have said
that consumerism is constrained by the fact that it must know how to
tune compassion and love and respect towards consumers to higher
consumer confidence index, that's all beautiful, because it is a balance
of powers that provoke and bring more quality, like when i have said
also that you have to know how to not neglect compassion and love and
respect to not cause extremism and violence in the system, that's also a
counter-power that provoke and bring more quality, this is all
about the balance of powers and counter-powers that provoke
and bring more quality to the system, this is why you have finally
seen me saying the following to you:
 
About dictatorship and communism
 
The problem with those is the problem of the past, because there is
a necessity to provoke and bring quality with the introduction of new
mechanisms, like the mechanisms of the counter-power of consumerism and
consumer confidence index, and like the mechanism of the power of
democracy, and like the mechanism of the counter-power of the financial
and bank institutions that have there rating methodology that take into
account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and this
creates more quality and a world stability, this balance of powers
ensure us of more stability and more quality and more security, this is
the weakness of dictatorship and communism, they lack some of or all of
those mechanisms that bring more quality.
 
Capitalism is changing from commodity capital to intellectual capital.
 
Intellectual capital is where you will have more money and it is where
you will become more rich and prosperous.
 
 
See the following video:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qYmZPP4AO8
 
 
About capitalism..
 
If you say , to become rich you must work hard.
 
In capitalism that's not true, because Intellectual giftedness can make
you rich faster without working hard and/or without suffering. That's a
principle in capitalism, and this condition is authorized by capitalism
because this is how you become rich as a nation and this is how you can
take taxes from the rich.
 
About jews..
 
The history of jews is related to capitalism, Hitler has attacked
jews because he has attacked capitalism.
 
But i don't think that Hitler was right..
 
Because of Intellectual giftedness of jews, so jews can become rich
faster without working hard and without suffering.. but we have not to
hate this, because it is a principle of capitalism that is important,
because it is how we become rich as a nation, and because read again:
 
About capitalism..
 
 
If you say , to become rich you must work hard.
 
In capitalism that's not true, because Intellectual giftedness can make
you rich faster without working hard and/or without suffering. That's a
principle in capitalism, and this condition is authorized by capitalism
because this is how you become rich as a nation and this is how you can
take taxes from the rich, and also because Intellectual elites has to
sacrifice for money to maximize better the benefit of science and
development.
 
I will add the following factor to my model:
 
Economic integration with others and also economic investment render the
world more stable and more peaceful and more secure, and because
consumerism has to guide governance and consumerism is also the
consequence of compassion and respect, because to not hurt consumer
confidence index you have to know how to be compassion and respect. This
is the solution of the problem between Israel and arab countries, they
must have more economic integration and more economic investment between
them to be more peace and stability.
 
Please read again the rest of my model:
 
With a Top-down approach i have come to an important subject:
 
I have said that:
 
Other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to
not hurt consumer confidence index internationally and locally.
 
This is an important factor to be able to tune well the political
philosophy that must guide governance, you have also to think governance
by knowing how to tune economic investing into the third world
countries, this is mandatory, to be more precise i will say that you
have to know that like Fordism, consumerism has also to guide our
political philosophy, and consumerism is a consequence of respect and
compassion, so this is very serious, and the essence of America is
constructed on this fact, so adding this principle to my model will get
you on the right path, here is the rest of my model that i have enhanced:
 
About extremist nationalism and communism..
 
Extremist nationalism like the far-right or neo-nazi political parties
is an archaic thinking that causes violence and extremism and
instability, communism is the same, so we have to be wiser
and understand that this kind of extremism has also to be avoided
by knowing the following:
 
"The economic models developed by the development economists of the
1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be
losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic
development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the
development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. "
by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy
Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank.
 
Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english,
because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco
my country:
 
http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha
 
 
And i have said that efficient thinking is not thinking small..
 
Efficient thinking is thinking bigger..
 
You have to think bigger to be able to survive better..
 
But thinking bigger is not suicidal thinking that causes suffering to
the people, suicidal thinking is a nihilist thinking that is not
efficient thinking that thinks bigger and that solves problems, so be
capable and be responsable and be wise, being wiser is also taking into
account the right variables and factors that enhance your living
conditions and the living conditions of your children and the people..
 
But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce
morality with laws, but morality is not something easy ,
because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality
is inferred also from empirical moral that is also from power and
counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is
not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is
different, we are getting world stability from the power and the
counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is
the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial
and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into
account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we
have the counter-power of the consumers confidence index, and this
creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic
systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance,
other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like
mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more
organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and
extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning
compassion and respect right with social services and medical services
and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid
violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this
compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how
to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consumer confidence index
internationally and locally.
 
 
And about immigration:
 
Virility and usefulness
 
We have to do more philosophy..
 
There is some of you who define virility as being courageous or violent..
 
But this is not the right way to define virility..
 
You have to define it to know it:
 
Virility is maturity and also it is intelligence and it is
money and it is knowledge and it is efficiency etc.
 
Virility is not just being violent or being courageous..
 
Now can we make this criterion of virility the criterion
at how we have to be selected as an immigrant ?
 
I don't think it is the right way..
 
Because to be accepted as an immigrant we have to be categorized
by the criterion of usefulness, this is optimization of today,
so to fulfil the goal of economic growth and economic efficiency
and to be able to give jobs to the right persons, we have to think
by the criterion of usefulness, this is how works USA and this is
how works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into
consideration human rights.
 
Knowledge changes your perception..
 
But quality of knowledge is also very important to set it right..
 
To overcome many constraints you have to know how to tune some
variables, like you have to know how to define usefulness,
and this is the weakness of neo-nazis like ideologies,
today optimization is defined by the criterion of usefulness,
and usefulness is not that arabs have to be as beautiful as
white europeans, this is the old way of thinking, so
usefulness to conform to the standards of today that
take into account efficiency of economy has been defined
differently than the neo-nazis kind of thinking, so
we have to adapt , because USA and Canada have to
optimize there economies taking into account many
constraints, because also usefulness is constrained
also by contraints and this is why USA and Canada
are getting more clever at defining usefulness and usefulness of
immigrants to better optimize there economies, so i am calling
to all of you to adapt to the reality of today, because
the past was the past, and today is today, so please adapt
yourself !
 
And more about the criterion of
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No comments: