- Read again... - 1 Update
- About the cost/performance ratio.. - 1 Update
- Empirical moral - 1 Update
- About my logical proofs and views of my political model - 1 Update
- Here is my last proof... - 1 Update
- Read again my proof, i correct - 1 Update
- My proof about political ideologies.. - 1 Update
- Dijkstra's and Bellman-Ford-Moore's algorithms for Delphi and FreePascal were updated to version 1.13 - 1 Update
- My thoughts... - 1 Update
| rami17 <rami17@rami17.net>: May 09 08:04AM -0400 Hello...... About the cost/performance ratio.. The cost/performance ratio is important.. We have to offer a diversity of cost/performance ratio to be more competitive, we have to say bye bye to monopoly of the past of IBM, competitiveness is causing love and respect and compassion towards consummers from companies that sell products and services .. so the world has changed more.. And you have to be competitive in economy, but competitiveness must be seen as being a kind of good sport, not as being violence, so you have to be sportive and think sportive , this is how you have to change your perception, and you have to know how to be competitive and at the same time knowing how to make love and compassion and respect towards consumers to higher the consumer confidence index in you. this is what we call being smart, this is the game also of today. And speaking about cost/performance, read the following: I have implemented my Universal Scalability Law progam.. Where do you use it ? You use it for example to optimize more the cost/performance ratio on multicores and manycores. With -nlr option means that the problem will be solved with the mathematical nonlinear regression using the simplex method as a minimization, if you don't specify -nlr, the problem will be solved by default by the mathematical polynomial regression, and since it uses regression , you can use it for example to test your system on many more cores with just a few points, and after that using regression it searchs for the cost/performance ratio that is optimal for you. Please read more about my Universal Scalability Law for Delphi and FreePascal, it comes with a graphical and a command-line program. I have included a 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables called usl.exe and usl_graph.exe inside the zip, please read the readme file to know how to use it, it is a very powerful tool. You can read about it and download it from here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami17 <rami17@rami17.net>: May 09 08:03AM -0400 Hello.......... About the cost/performance ratio.. The cost/performance ratio is important.. We have to offer a diversity of cost/performance ratio to be more competitive, we have to say bye bye to monopoly of the past of IBM , competitiveness is causing love and respect and compassion towards consummers from companies that sell products and services .. so the world has changed more.. And you have to be competitive in economy, but competitiveness must be seen as being a kind of good sport, not as being violence, so you have to be sportive and think sportive , this is how you have to change your perception, and you have to know how to be competitive and at the same time knowing how to make love and compassion and respect towards consumers to higher the consumer confidence index in you. this is what we call being smart, this is the game also of today. And speaking about cost/performance, read the following: I have implemented my Universal Scalability Law progam.. Where do you use it ? You use it for example to optimize more the cost/performance ratio on multicores and manycores. With -nlr option means that the problem will be solved with the mathematical nonlinear regression using the simplex method as a minimization, if you don't specify -nlr, the problem will be solved by default by the mathematical polynomial regression, and since it uses regression , you can use it for example to test your system on many more cores with just a few points, and after that using regression it searchs for the cost/performance ratio that is optimal for you. Please read more about my Universal Scalability Law for Delphi and FreePascal, it comes with a graphical and a command-line program. I have included a 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables called usl.exe and usl_graph.exe inside the zip, please read the readme file to know how to use it, it is a very powerful tool. You can read about it and download it from here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal |
| rami17 <rami17@rami17.net>: May 08 07:26PM -0400 Hello......... Intellectual elites can easily become rich because Intellectual giftedness render the intellectual job for them easy and make them rich quickly and more easily. And here is my last proof that is more correct: Since smart reusability of freely available knowledge is prevalent today, so it's like socialism in disguise inside capitalistic countries that can make you more rich and more intellectual.. so the above problem is solved mostly. Also i will refine my proof: Intellectual elites has to sacrifice for money to maximize better the benefit of science and development. Thus my above proof says that letting Intellectual elites becoming rich to a certain degree is authorized by empirical moral. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami17 <rami17@rami17.net>: May 08 05:44PM -0400 Hello.............. About my logical proofs and views of my political model: To stabilize and secure our world i have said that: Economic integration with others and also economic investment render the world more stable and more peaceful and more secure, and because consumerism has to guide governance and consumerism is also the consequence of compassion and respect, because to not hurt consumer confidence index you have to know how to be compassion and respect. This is the solution of the problem between Israel and arab countries, they must have more economic integration and more economic investment between them to be more peace and stability. Other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consummer confidence index internationally and locally. This is an important factor to be able to tune well the political philosophy that must guide governance, you have also to think governance by knowing how to tune economic investing into the third world countries, this is mandatory, to be more precise i will say that you have to know that like Fordism, consumerism has also to guide our political philosophy, and consumerism is a consequence of respect and compassion, so this is very serious, and the essence of America is constructed on this fact, so adding this principle to my model will get you on the right path, here is the rest of my model that i have enhanced: About extremist nationalism and communism.. Extremist nationalism like the far-right or neo-nazi political parties is an archaic thinking that causes violence and extremism and instability, communism is the same, so we have to be wiser and understand that this kind of extremism has also to be avoided by knowing the following: "The economic models developed by the development economists of the 1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. " by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank. Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english, because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco my country: http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce morality with laws, but morality is not something easy , because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality is infered also from empirical moral that is also from power and counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is different, we are getting world stability from the power and the counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we have the counter-power of the consummers confidence index, and this creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid violence and extremisme is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consummer confidence index internationally and locally. And about immigration: Virility and usefulness We have to do more philosophy.. There is some of you who define virility as being courageous or violent.. But this is not the right way to define virility.. You have to define it to know it: Virility is maturity and also it is intelligence and it is money and it is knowledge and it is efficiency etc. Virility is not just being violent or being courageous.. Now can we make this criterion of virility the criterion at how we have to be selected as an immigrant ? I don't think it is the right way.. Because to be accepted as an immigrant we have to be categorized by the criterion of usefulness, this is optimization of today, so to fulfil the goal of economic growth and economic efficiency and to be able to give jobs to the right persons, we have to think by the criterion of usefulness, this is how works USA and this is how works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into consideration human rights. Knowledge changes your perception.. But quality of knowledge is also very important to set it right.. To overcome many constrains you have to know how to tune some variables, like you have to know how to define usefulness, and this is the weakness of neo-nazis like ideologies, today optimization is defined by the criterion of usefulness, and usefulness is not that arabs have to be as beautiful as white europeans, this is the old way of thinking, so usefulness to conform to the standards of today that take into account efficiency of economy has been defined differently than the neo-nazis kind of thinking, so we have to adapt , because USA and Canada have to optimize there economies taking into account many constrains, because also usefulness is constrained also by contrains and this is why USA and Canada are getting more clever at defining usefulness and usefulness of immigrants to better optimize there economies, so i am calling to all of you to adapt to the reality of today, because the past was the past, and today is today, so please adapt yourself ! And more about the criterion of usefulness.. Optimization today is defined by usefulness.. But do you think that usefulness can be tuned exactly ? No Sir, usefulness is constrained by some constrains that make tuning of usefulness more an approximation than an exact calculation, this is the weakness of the far-right and neo-nazis kind of ideologies, you have to know that tuning usefulness is still an approximation, and this approximation sets optimization that sets immigration. So don't be immature and adapt yourself to today and to science ! About the essence of beautifulness.. You will say that beautifulness is good.. But if you are not as beautiful as the other, like arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, you can still enhance yourself by executing rules like computers execute instructions to make yourself more beautiful and/or more disciplined and/or more compassion and/or love, by knowing that love and/or compassion and/or beautifulness is the result/output also of executing rules without being compassion or/and without being love and/or without being beautifulness is a kind of discipline that must be learned by all, because this discipline can solve many of our problems. We have to set right our perception.. And you have to relearn how to walk right.. What says to me rationality and logic and measure ? That compassion can be virility, because compassion gets us more organized because neglecting compassion cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion right with social services to people to avoid violence and extremisme is also more stability and more power , so this compassion is virility. And in economy taking into account consumer confidence index , we have to be more disciplined with compassion and respect towards others like arabs and africans to not hurt our economy , this is the essence of usefulness that sets right optimization and that sets also immigration. So you have to be more disciplined in your thinking with more rationality and logic and meaure to set it right. About rationality and logic and measure.. As you have noticed i am doing political philosophy here using the tools of philosophy that are rationality and logic and measure, but i have learned a wisdom from that, that political philosophy must be taken as a science, because the tools of philosophy that are rationality and logic and measure are called "more science", and i have learned another wisdom from my work on political philosophy is that you have to be patient with political philosophy like being patient with science, because in political philosophy you are going step by step and layer by layer incrementally to attain the goal to set your perception right, so you have to be patient to wait for your perception to be set right, it is like doing science. About hate.. I think some of you are still immature.. Because hating arabs and hating africans is not scientific, you have to know that economy today is not just nationalism, it is also companies like Boeing and Intel and many many others selling to arabs and to africans, so you have to know how to tune compassion and respect towards arabs and africans to not hurt consumer confidence index and to not hurt economy, this is also science, and arabs and africans also must know how to tune compassion and respect to attract more investment and to be able to think bigger taking into account consumer confidence index also. Thinking bigger... The weakness of neo-nazis and far-right like ideologies is that they don't think bigger.. Economy today is thinking also bigger.. Many companies like Intel and Boeing etc. are thinking bigger, so they are not thinking just nationalism, because to be able to think bigger you have to know how to give respect to arabs and to africans, and giving respect to arabs and to africans can be also more investment in arab and african countries, and also as you will notice that economic growth in arab and african countries is higher than Europeans or American countries, so you have to know how to capture opportunities in economy by knowing how to not hurt the consumer confidence index by not hating arabs or africans and knowing also how to set respect by investing on other countries.. Nationalism has to adapt and think bigger ! What do you think is survival ? Survival is usefulness and it is also compassion and respect, this is scientific, this is optimization, science is not hating stupidly, you have to be the director of companies like Intel or Boeing to be able to understand what i am saying, you are thinking small by hating stupidly, and thinking small is not survival, you have to think bigger and being more disciplined at thinking bigger ! you have to know how to manage yourself and how to manage America ! stupidly hating is not management and it is not science ! so you have to set your perception right by listening to science and to wisdom , you are thinking like optimizing is hating the other ! this is childish behavior of nationalism of today ! so be capable at thinking bigger ! this is the standards of today ! we have to think bigger to better survive ! so don't be childish ! You have to know how to optimize economy too to be more powerful and more organized, and the prerequisites is transcendence of inferiority that lack optimization. Morality is the same , it permits us to transcend , because it gets us more organized and more efficient to better survive, and because science is part of morality, because is laws part of morality ? yes, because science also rules us with rules of optimization that has as a goal to give more quality and more happiness to the people, so this is part of good, so we have to enlarge our conception of what is morality, thus including science as a part of morality is part of the game today, this is part of the high standards of today, this view is also enforced with the fact also that thinking bigger like thinking how to be more scalable or as to be more organized world wide or as to be world order and security is an essential part of requirements of today, but it's necessary to know also that taking science alone as morality is corruption , because science with more maximization and more optimization can neglect the weakers among us , so science can be a kind of horror like the horror of nazism, so please be wiser and reread my following full text to understand better my views: About Stability and world order.. How to get stability and world order ? You have to stabilize and secure the country also, and this has to be done by searching for the rules to execute that avoid extremism and violence, this is mandatory for our democracies, so i have told you to notice that neglecting compassion and/or love and/or respect cause violence and extremism and desorder, so you have not to neglect them , and you have to know how to higher consumer confidence index to better optimize economy world wide, so for that you have to know how to avoid hate towards other people that causes problems to economy , because it hurts consumer confidence index, and you have to know to not get into communism and to avoid extremism of communism because communism is too extreme and its extremism causes violence, so you have to know how to tune those variables of compassion and respect and love and how to optimize the system, and how to do it ? by being for example more social like being social democracy and or being social Liberalism, hope you have understood my proof.. and this is not finished because you have to think about immigration, and here is what i have said about immigration: In parallel computer programming we have to optimize, like by reducing the size of the serial part, and by reducing the cache coherence traffic etc. and this to render your software or algorithm scalable, so we are concerned by the scalability criterion.. Capitalism also wants to optimize, and capitalism says for example that even arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, it says that arabs are tolerable, because capitalism wants to optimize economy and the society by bringing arabs immigrants that are also decent people, because today we are constrained by many factors, and optimization has been rendered by those constrains to as the following: If you are useful for something like jobs and economy or/and useful to low birth rate of white europeans or/and you are useful to higher the consumer confidence index and/or and you are useful to better the world order and security , you can be welcome to USA or other countries.. About America and the world.. Before, operating systems like OS/2 of IBM were a monolithic OSs , but as the time has gone by we have developed more sophisticated OSs like Mach 3 or Windows NT, those sophisticated OSs were more decentralized and were designed in a such a way to be more efficient and managed better, the difference between a monolithic one and not monolithic one is like programming with message passing or Object oriented programming, and we have also the tendency to decentralize the management of our societies to be more efficient, it's the same for capitalism , capitalism tries to optimize better by not being as monolithic as the old way of thinking of Hitler, so today because of constrains on optimization, usefulness is interpreted not as being as beautiful as white europeans or |
| rami17 <rami17@rami17.net>: May 08 04:52PM -0400 Hello............ Here is my last proof... I have said that: === My proof about political ideologies.. I have taken a look at communism and capitalism, and i think there is still a problem to clear , it's the one of the intellectual elites.. Intellectual elites can easily become rich because Intellectual giftedness render the intellectual job for them easy and make them rich quickly and more easily. So there is a problem. But there is still a proof, that an IQ of 110 can still find difficult its job, so since there is still suffering for IQs of 110 , so we can not categorize easily those categories of IQ of 110 as becoming rich quickly and easily. So communism has still a problem with intellectual Elites that has much higher IQs including jews. === Here is my last proof that is more correct: Since smart reusability of freely available knowledge is prevalent today, so it's like socialism in disguise inside capitalistic countries that can make you more rich and more intellectual.. so the above problem is solved mostly. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami17 <rami17@rami17.net>: May 08 04:13PM -0400 Hello.......... My proof about political ideologies.. I have taken a look at communism and capitalism, and i think there is still a problem to clear , it's the one of the intellectual elites.. Intellectual elites can easily become rich because Intellectual giftedness render the intellectual job for them easy and make them rich quickly and more easily. So there is a problem. But there is still a proof, that an IQ of 110 can still find difficult its job, so since there is still suffering for IQs of 110 , so we can not categorize easily those categories of IQ of 110 as becoming rich quickly and easily. So communism has still a problem with intellectual Elites that has much higher IQs including jews. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami17 <rami17@rami17.net>: May 08 03:58PM -0400 Hello......... My proof about political ideologies.. I have taken a look at communism and capitalism, and i think there is still a problem to clear , it's the one of the intellectual elites.. Intellectual elites can easily become rich because Intellectual giftedness render the intellectual job for them easy and make them rich quickly and more easily. So there a problem. But there is still a proof, that an IQ of 110 or 115 can still find difficult its job, so since there is still suffering for IQs of 110 and 115, so we can not categorize easily those categories of IQ of 110 or 115 as becoming rich quickly and easily. So communism has still a problem with intellectual Elites that has much higher IQs including jews. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami17 <rami17@rami17.net>: May 08 01:37PM -0400 Hello....... Dijkstra's and Bellman-Ford-Moore's algorithms for Delphi and FreePascal were updated to version 1.13, now they compile correctly on LLVM-based Delphi compilers: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/dijkstra-and-bellman-ford-moore-s-algorithms Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami17 <rami17@rami17.net>: May 08 11:24AM -0400 Hello... Capitalism is changing from commodity capital to intellectual capital. Intellectual capital is where you will have more money and it is where you will become more rich and prosperous. See the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qYmZPP4AO8 About capitalism.. If you say , to become rich you must work hard. In capitalism that's not true, because Intellectual giftedness can make you rich faster without working hard and/or without suffering. That's a principle in capitalism, and this condition is authorized by capitalism because this is how you become rich as a nation and this is how you can take taxes from the rich. About jews.. The history of jews is related to capitalism, Hitler has attacked jews because he has attacked capitalism. But i don't think that Hitler was right.. Because of Intellectual giftedness of jews, so jews can become rich faster without working hard and without suffering.. but we have not to hate this, because it is a principle of capitalism that is important, because it is how we become rich as a nation, and because read again: About capitalism.. If you say , to become rich you must work hard. In capitalism that's not true, because Intellectual giftedness can make you rich faster without working hard and/or without suffering. That's a principle in capitalism, and this condition is authorized by capitalism because this is how you become rich as a nation and this is how you can take taxes from the rich. I will add the following factor to my model: Economic integration with others and also economic investment render the world more stable and more peaceful and more secure, and because consumerism has to guide governance and consumerism is also the consequence of compassion and respect, because to not hurt consumer confidence index you have to know how to be compassion and respect. This is the solution of the problem between Israel and arab countries, they must have more economic integration and more economic investment between them to be more peace and stability. Please read again the rest of my model: With a Top-down approach i have come to an important subject: I have said that: Other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consummer confidence index internationally and locally. This is an important factor to be able to tune well the political philosophy that must guide governance, you have also to think governance by knowing how to tune economic investing into the third world countries, this is mandatory, to be more precise i will say that you have to know that like Fordism, consumerism has also to guide our political philosophy, and consumerism is a consequence of respect and compassion, so this is very serious, and the essence of America is constructed on this fact, so adding this principle to my model will get you on the right path, here is the rest of my model that i have enhanced: About extremist nationalism and communism.. Extremist nationalism like the far-right or neo-nazi political parties is an archaic thinking that causes violence and extremism and instability, communism is the same, so we have to be wiser and understand that this kind of extremism has also to be avoided by knowing the following: "The economic models developed by the development economists of the 1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. " by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank. Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english, because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco my country: http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha And i have said that efficient thinking is not thinking small.. Efficient thinking is thinking bigger.. You have to think bigger to be able to survive better.. But thinking bigger is not suicidal thinking that causes suffering to the people, suicidal thinking is a nihilist thinking that is not efficient thinking that thinks bigger and that solves problems, so be capable and be responsable and be wise, being wiser is also taking into account the right variables and factors that enhance your living conditions and the living conditions of your children and the people.. So here is again my model that i have enhanced: But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce morality with laws, but morality is not something easy , because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality is infered also from empirical moral that is also from power and counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is different, we are getting world stability from the power and the counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we have the counter-power of the consummers confidence index, and this creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid violence and extremisme is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consummer confidence index internationally and locally. And about immigration: Virility and usefulness We have to do more philosophy.. There is some of you who define virility as being courageous or violent.. But this is not the right way to define virility.. You have to define it to know it: Virility is maturity and also it is intelligence and it is money and it is knowledge and it is efficiency etc. Virility is not just being violent or being courageous.. Now can we make this criterion of virility the criterion at how we have to be selected as an immigrant ? I don't think it is the right way.. Because to be accepted as an immigrant we have to be categorized by the criterion of usefulness, this is optimization of today, so to fulfil the goal of economic growth and economic efficiency and to be able to give jobs to the right persons, we have to think by the criterion of usefulness, this is how works USA and this is how works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into consideration human rights. Knowledge changes your perception.. But quality of knowledge is also very important to set it right.. To overcome many constrains you have to know how to tune some variables, like you have to know how to define usefulness, and this is the weakness of neo-nazis like ideologies, today optimization is defined by the criterion of usefulness, and usefulness is not that arabs have to be as beautiful as white europeans, this is the old way of thinking, so usefulness to conform to the standards of today that take into account efficiency of economy has been defined differently than the neo-nazis kind of thinking, so we have to adapt , because USA and Canada have to optimize there economies taking into account many constrains, because also usefulness is constrained also by contrains and this is why USA and Canada are getting more clever at defining usefulness and usefulness of immigrants to better optimize there economies, so i am calling to all of you to adapt to the reality of today, because the past was the past, and today is today, so please adapt yourself ! And more about the criterion of usefulness.. Optimization today is defined by usefulness.. But do you think that usefulness can be tuned exactly ? No Sir, usefulness is constrained by some constrains that make tuning of usefulness more an approximation than an exact calculation, this is the weakness of the far-right and neo-nazis kind of ideologies, you have to know that tuning usefulness is still an approximation, and this approximation sets optimization that sets immigration. So don't be immature and adapt yourself to today and to science ! About the essence of beautifulness.. You will say that beautifulness is good.. But if you are not as beautiful as the other, like arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, you can still enhance yourself by executing rules like computers execute instructions to make yourself more beautiful and/or more disciplined and/or more compassion and/or love, by knowing that love and/or compassion and/or beautifulness is the result/output also of executing rules without being compassion or/and without being love and/or without being beautifulness is a kind of discipline that must be learned by all, because this discipline can solve many of our problems. We have to set right our perception.. And you have to relearn how to walk right.. What says to me rationality and logic and measure ? That compassion can be virility, because compassion gets us more organized because neglecting compassion cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion right with social services to people to avoid violence and extremisme is also more stability and more power , so this compassion is virility. And in economy taking into account consumer confidence index , we have to be more disciplined with compassion and respect towards others like arabs and africans to not hurt our economy , this is the essence of usefulness that sets right optimization and that sets also immigration. So you have to be more disciplined in your thinking with more rationality and logic and meaure to set it right. About rationality and logic and measure.. As you have noticed i am doing political philosophy here using the tools of philosophy that are rationality and logic and measure, but i have learned a wisdom from that, that political philosophy must be taken as a science, because the tools of philosophy that are rationality and logic and measure are called "more science", and i have learned another wisdom from my work on political philosophy is that you have to be patient with political philosophy like being patient with science, because in political philosophy you are going step by step and layer by layer incrementally to attain the goal to set your perception right, so you have to be patient to wait for your perception to be set right, it is like doing science. About hate.. I think some of you are still immature.. Because hating arabs and hating africans is not scientific, you have to know that economy today is not just nationalism, it is also companies like Boeing and Intel and many many others selling to arabs and to africans, so you have to know how to tune compassion and respect towards arabs and africans to not hurt consumer confidence index and to not hurt economy, this is also science, and arabs and africans also must know how to tune compassion and respect to attract more investment and to be able to think bigger taking into account consumer confidence index also. Thinking bigger... The weakness of neo-nazis and far-right like ideologies is that they don't think bigger.. Economy today is thinking also bigger.. Many companies like Intel and Boeing etc. are thinking bigger, so they are not thinking just nationalism, because to be able to think bigger you have to know how to give respect to arabs and to africans, and giving respect to arabs and to africans can be also more investment in arab and african countries, and also as you will notice that economic growth in arab and african countries is higher than Europeans or American countries, so you have to know how to capture opportunities in economy by knowing how to not hurt the consumer confidence index by not hating arabs or africans and knowing also how to set respect by investing on other countries.. Nationalism has to adapt and think bigger ! What do you think is survival ? Survival is usefulness and it is also compassion and respect, this is scientific, this is optimization, science is not hating stupidly, you have to be the director of companies like Intel or Boeing to be able to understand what i am saying, you are thinking small by hating stupidly, and thinking small is not survival, you have to think bigger and being more disciplined at thinking bigger ! you have to know how to manage yourself and how to manage America ! stupidly hating is not management and it is not science ! so you have to set your perception right by listening to science and to wisdom , you are thinking like optimizing is hating the other ! this is childish behavior of nationalism of today ! so be capable at thinking bigger ! this is the standards of today ! we have to think bigger to better survive ! so don't be childish ! More philosophy about Israel... If we say that the land is just a land and we must fight for it. Is it a good principle ? I don't think that by the standards of today we can easily follow this principle that is followed by Israel.. Because arabs are the neighbors of Israel and economy is an important factor that must guide our political philosophy, because look at Europe there is like a united Europe, and there is a united America, so i think that by nature we arabs and jews must be more united to be more efficient and more prosperous economically. So you have to take into account this fact and Israel must think twice before doing harm to arabs, and it must be guided towards peace. More philosophy about how to be more united... Hope you have understood my post about the law of the land, so i have explained that the law of the land must be constrained by more variables such as efficiency and economy to not make the law of the land hurt our standard of living, this is my approach to this principle, now my principle also must guide our actions towards others, i give you an example: If you say blacks are blacks and they must be rejected just because they are another race from us.. This principle is like saying the land is just a land and we must fight for it, like is doing Israel. Is it a good principle ? It is not. Because i don't think that by the standards of today we can easily follow this principle , because our world is an interconnected world where we must be more efficient and more efficient economically , so if we do harm to blacks in America, we risk that others such as africans and others will not do economy with us and will do harm to us, so since it is an interconnected world, so my principle says that the law of the land and our actions must be constrained by the standards of today that take into account efficiency and economy. There is a neo-nazi from Poland in the forum of soc.culture.israel, that wants to return to laws that are more racist and that reject |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment