- Read again, i correct a typo - 1 Update
- Getting more technical in politics... - 1 Update
- About a technical matter - 1 Update
- Read again... - 1 Update
- I will get more technical - 1 Update
- Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver ,Library version 1.64 - 1 Update
- Universal Scalability Law program was updated to version 3.12 - 1 Update
- How to improve also quality and timeliness of software ? - 1 Update
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 28 11:06PM -0400 Hello.............. Read again, i correct a typo Getting more technical in politics... Getting more technical that's also mean getting more efficient with rationality and logic, because i am a rational type of person.. You have to understand the game of politics.. The game of politics is not saying that jews are getting rich so jews are bad, this is the neo-nazism way of thinking.. But this thinking is inferior.. Because when you think about morality, you have to decompose morality into the guidance of morality and the a priori pure moral and empirical moral.. I have defined the guidance of morality as being the goal of philosophy that is happiness that guides also morality, this guidance is inherent to our essence. And a priori pure moral is inferred from reason and empirical moral is inferred from empirical world. So morality is not too much ideal justice as in communism using the tool of the violence of Class Struggle because of compassion that wants to reduce too much social Darwinism, this causes extremism and violence, or morality is not too extreme definition of what is white europeans civilization, as in neo-nazism, and that lacks the optimization with the heuristic of "tolerance" towards immigration that optimizes the economic system and the social system , this is an inferior thinking. You can make more money with more money, but allowing making more money is also a mechanism like an heuristic that provoke and bring more quality, this is also inferred from empirical moral, it's like the heuristic of "tolerance" that optimizes the system, we allow also to make more money to not being laziness and to be more productif and to be more efficient and to be more creativity and to be more inventivity.. so this heuristic is the base of capitalism also, this is why we can not say that capitalism is bad, but capitalism and the system is also constrained by other mechanisms like the mechanism of not neglecting compassion and respect and love to not cause violence and extremism in the system, now the interpretation of how much compassion and respect and love will not be leaved to the reader, because the degree of compassion and love and respect needed in the system must be interpreted as avoiding extremism that can causes hate and violence and desorder, so the degree of compassion and love and respect must be approximated by a political party such as social democracy or social Liberalism that knows how to be decent compassion and decent respect and decent love, the other important mechanism is "democracy" and the power of the people , this power of the people can provoke and bring quality but it's also constrained by the mechanism and the counter-power of the financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and this creates also a world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance and responsable democracy, the other mechanism is also the consumer confidence index that is a power that provoke and bring quality to the system, because we have to know how to be respect and compassion and love to higher consumer confidence index locally and internationally, the other mechanism about morality is the soft way and the hard way to provoke and bring quality to morality, You have to know how to provoke and bring quality to morality of the system, there is the soft way and the hard way.. all is not laws, you have to know how to provoke and bring quality using the soft way, like i was doing in my previous post called: "What is the most important goal of my political philosophy?" and you have to know how to design and implement laws by being more efficient at inferring them from the guidance of moral and a priori pure moral and empirical moral more, this is the essence of efficiency, you have to be capable and smarter in doing it, that's a necessary requirement to survive better and that fact is the soft way that provoke and bring more quality and the hard way is to know how to enforce the necessary laws, so be smart, because it's the essence of rationality and logic. Also there is the mechanism and heuristic of "tolerance" over immigration that provoke and bring more quality, as i have said that Nationalism of Donald Trump lack the heuristic of flexibility using tolerance that get you more optimized, but social Liberalism of democrates uses the flexibility of tolerance to optimize the economic system and the social system, nationalism is like extreme justice of communism that lack tolerance and that can hurt economic system and the social system. Because I have said about morality that: Justice has to constrain happiness.. And responsability has to constrain justice.. But responsability is influenced by the variable of tolerance , so if we are more tolerance on responsability we can higher the consumer confidence in you and we can attract more consumers and we can penetrate more the market of others, this is the game of social Liberalism. Social Liberalism of democrates wants also to play the card of tolerance to attract consumers and to higher consumer confidence index and to be able to penetrate more the market of others and to optimize better the social system, nationalism doesn't undertand it well. And i have explained also to you about the heuristic of "tolerance" that: Capitalism also wants to optimize, and capitalism says for example that even arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, it says that arabs are tolerable, because capitalism wants to optimize economy and the society by bringing arabs immigrants that are also decent people, because today we are constrained by many factors, and optimization has been rendered by those constrains to as the following: If you are useful for something like jobs and economy or/and useful to low birth rate of white europeans or/and you are useful to higher the consumer confidence index and/or and you are useful to better the world order and security , you can be welcome to USA or other countries.. About America and the world.. Before, operating systems like OS/2 of IBM were a monolithic OSs , but as the time has gone by we have developed more sophisticated OSs like Mach 3 or Windows NT, those sophisticated OSs were more decentralized and were designed in a such a way to be more efficient and managed better, the difference between a monolithic one and not monolithic one is like programming with message passing or Object oriented programming, and we have also the tendency to decentralize the management of our societies to be more efficient, it's the same for capitalism , capitalism tries to optimize better by not being as monolithic as the old way of thinking of Hitler, so today because of constrains on optimization, usefulness is interpreted not as being as beautiful as white europeans or being as civilized as white europeans to better optimize the system economically.. it's like decentralizing to better optimize, now to not get extremist, you have to know how to tune correctly optimization to better optimize and to not cause problems to societies. Also you have to know how to apply the division of labour and how to apply Adam Smith's specialization Theory to be more optimized.. And the other mechanism that bring quality to the system is the following: About the crispations of extremist nationalism.. The old way of thinking like nazism and communism was full of violence.. So we have to enhance ourselves to avoid those problems.. The world has changed, and we are not at the time of Hitler in 1930, the crispations of extremist nationalism was also due to a need of being more domination in the secondary sector of economy, but this model is becoming more archaic, please read why: "The economic models developed by the development economists of the 1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. " by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank. Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english, because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco my country: http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 28 10:42PM -0400 Hello............... Getting more technical in politics... Getting more technical that's also mean getting more efficient with rationality and logic, because i am a rational type of person.. You have to understand the game of politics.. The game of politics is not saying that jews are getting rich so jews are bad, this is the neo-nazism way of thinking.. But this thinking is inferior.. Because when you think about morality, you have to decompose morality into the guidance of morality and the a priori pure moral and empirical moral.. I have defined the guidance of morality as being the goal of philosophy that is happiness that guides also morality, this guidance is inherent to our essence. And a priori pure moral is inferred from reason and empirical moral is inferred from empirical world. So morality is not too much ideal justice as in communism using the tool of the violence of Class Struggle because of compassion that wants to reduce too much social Darwinism, this causes extremism and violence, or morality is not too extreme definition of what is white europeans civilization, as in neo-nazism, and that lacks the optimization with the heuristic of "tolerance" towards immigration that optimizes the economic system and the social system , this is an inferior thinking. You can make more money with more money, but allowing making more money is also a mechanism like an heuristic that provoke and bring more quality, this is also inferred from empirical moral, it's like the heuristic of "tolerance" that optimizes the system, we allow also to make more money to not being laziness and to be more productif and to be more efficient and to be more creativity and to be more inventivity.. so this heuristic is the base of capitalism also, this is why we can not say that capitalism is bad, but capitalism and the system is also constrained by other mechanisms like the mechanism of not neglecting compassion and respect and love to not cause violence and extremism in the system, now the interpretation of how much compassion and respect and love will not be leaved to the reader, because the degree of compassion and love and respect needed in the system must be interpreted as avoiding extremism that can causes hate and violence and desorder, so the degree of compassion and love and respect must be approximated by a political party such as social democracy or social Liberalism that lnows how to be decent compassion and decent respect and decent love, the other important mechanism is "democracy" and the power of the people , this power of the people can provoke and bring quality but it's also constrained by the mechanism and the counter-power of the financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and this creates also a world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance and responsable democracy, the other mechanism is also the consumer confidence index that is a power that provoke and bring quality to the system, because we have to know how to be respect and compassion and love to higher consumer confidence index locally and internationally, the other mechanism about morality is the soft way and the hard way to provoke and bring quality to morality, You have to know how to provoke and bring quality to morality of the system, there is the soft way and the hard way.. all is not laws, you have to know how to provoke and bring quality using the soft way, like i was doing in my previous post called: "What is the most important goal of my political philosophy?" and you have to know how to design and implement laws by being more efficient at inferring them from the guidance of moral and a priori pure moral and empirical moral more, this is the essence of efficiency, you have to be capable and smarter in doing it, that's a necessary requirement to survive better and that fact is the soft way that provoke and bring more quality and the hard way is to know how to enforce the necessary laws, so be smart, because it's the essence of rationality and logic. Also there is the mechanism and heuristic of "tolerance" over immigration that provoke and bring more quality, as i have said that Nationalism of Donald Trump lack the heuristic of flexibility using tolerance that get you more optimized, but social Liberalism of democrates uses the flexibility of tolerance to optimize the economic system and the social system, nationalism is like extreme justice of communism that lack tolerance and that can hurt economic system and the social system. Because I have said about morality that: Justice has to constrain happiness.. And responsability has to constrain justice.. But responsability is influenced by the variable of tolerance , so if we are more tolerance on responsability we can higher the consumer confidence in you and we can attract more consumers and we can penetrate more the market of others, this is the game of social Liberalism. Social Liberalism of democrates wants also to play the card of tolerance to attract consumers and to higher consumer confidence index and to be able to penetrate more the market of others and to optimize better the social system, nationalism doesn't undertand it well. And i have explained also to you about the heuristic of "tolerance" that: Capitalism also wants to optimize, and capitalism says for example that even arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, it says that arabs are tolerable, because capitalism wants to optimize economy and the society by bringing arabs immigrants that are also decent people, because today we are constrained by many factors, and optimization has been rendered by those constrains to as the following: If you are useful for something like jobs and economy or/and useful to low birth rate of white europeans or/and you are useful to higher the consumer confidence index and/or and you are useful to better the world order and security , you can be welcome to USA or other countries.. About America and the world.. Before, operating systems like OS/2 of IBM were a monolithic OSs , but as the time has gone by we have developed more sophisticated OSs like Mach 3 or Windows NT, those sophisticated OSs were more decentralized and were designed in a such a way to be more efficient and managed better, the difference between a monolithic one and not monolithic one is like programming with message passing or Object oriented programming, and we have also the tendency to decentralize the management of our societies to be more efficient, it's the same for capitalism , capitalism tries to optimize better by not being as monolithic as the old way of thinking of Hitler, so today because of constrains on optimization, usefulness is interpreted not as being as beautiful as white europeans or being as civilized as white europeans to better optimize the system economically.. it's like decentralizing to better optimize, now to not get extremist, you have to know how to tune correctly optimization to better optimize and to not cause problems to societies. Also you have to know how to apply the division of labour and how to apply Adam Smith's specialization Theory to be more optimized.. And the other mechanism that bring quality to the system is the following: About the crispations of extremist nationalism.. The old way of thinking like nazism and communism was full of violence.. So we have to enhance ourselves to avoid those problems.. The world has changed, and we are not at the time of Hitler in 1930, the crispations of extremist nationalism was also due to a need of being more domination in the secondary sector of economy, but this model is becoming more archaic, please read why: "The economic models developed by the development economists of the 1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. " by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank. Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english, because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco my country: http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 28 08:47PM -0400 Hello........... Please read this: "Just as with normal thread pool usage, the main program thread may create Tasks that will get queued on the global queue (e.g. Task1 and Task2) and threads will grab those Tasks typically in a FIFO manner. Where things diverge is that any new Tasks (e.g. Task3) created in the context of the executing Task (e.g. Task2) end up on a local queue for that thread pool thread." Read more here: http://www.danielmoth.com/Blog/New-And-Improved-CLR-4-Thread-Pool-Engine.aspx You will notice that there is a contention on the global queue from the producer threads and from the consumer threads on the Microsoft CLR Threadpool engine, so that's not good. But please look at the source code of my Threadpool engine that scales well, it does eliminate the contention on the consumer threads side by using technics such as lock-striping and other technics.. And my efficient threadpool that scales well supports the following: - Now it can use processor groups on windows, so that it can use more than 64 logical processors and it scales well. The following have been added to my efficient Threadpool engine: - The worker threads enters in a wait state when there is no job in the concurrent FIFO queues - for more efficiency - - You can distribute your jobs to the worker threads and call any method with the threadpool's execute() method. - It uses work-stealing to be more efficient. - You can configure it to use stacks or FIFO queues , when you use stacks it will be cache efficient. - Now it can use processor groups on windows, so that it can use more than 64 logical processors and it scales well. - Now it distributes the jobs on multiple FIFO queues or stacks so that it scales well. - You can wait for the jobs to finish with the wait() method. - It's NUMA-aware and NUMA efficient. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-that-scales-well And you can download my efficient Threadpool engine with priorities that scales well from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-well Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 28 08:28PM -0400 Hello....... I am a white arab... I am a computer programmer and i have a diploma in Microelectronics and informatics.. I will get more technical now because i am an experienced parallel programmer that has invented many synchronization algorithms and other algorithms etc. We are getting more sophisticated with using cloud computing and bigger interconnected websites, and that's what important, now the very important question to ask, since i have done also operational research, is that using IOCP using threadpools etc. to scale your website is not sufficient, because the very important thing is how to calculate and limit the response-time or waiting-time.. that's an interesting subject.. so we have for example to get more technical with operetoinal research and try to mathematically approximate as the following: Use my following simulation program of an M/M/n queue: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/m-m-n-queuing-model-simulation-with-object-pascal use it to do your overall simulation of the ecommerce websites that have read-mostly workloads, since many ecommerce websites have read-mostly workloads, so the hyper-exponential service of the M/G/c queue of the database servers queue above can be approximated with an M/M/n queue when the writer and the delete transactions are less or equal to 30% of the total transactions and the ecommerce website has read-mostly workloads. This is an interesting approximation with operational research.. But we can solve this problem of limiting the waiting-time or the response=time using windows timers, so as the websites users connect they will start a windows timers that correspond the limited waiting-time that we must constrain with, we will start a timer and push a callback function that will set a boolean flag to false if the limited waiting=time required expired , that way we will avoid to model the websites with an M/G/c queue etc. and it's important to give more priority to the write transactions because that's critical for your pocket. Thank you for your time. Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 28 08:25PM -0400 Hello........ I am a white arab... I am a computer programmer and i have a diploma in Microelectronics and informatics.. I will get more technical now because i am an experienced parallel programmer that has invented many synchronization algorithm and other algorithms etc. We are getting more sophisticated with using cloud computing and bigger interconnected websites, and that's what important, now the very important question to ask, since i have done also operational research, is that using IOCP using threadpools etc. to scale your website is not sufficient, because the very important thing is how to calculate and limit the response-time or waiting-time.. that's an interesting subject.. so we have for example to get more technical with operetoinal research and try to mathematically approximate as the following: Use my following simulation program of an M/M/n queue: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/m-m-n-queuing-model-simulation-with-object-pascal use it to do your overall simulation of the ecommerce websites that have read-mostly workloads, since many ecommerce websites have read-mostly workloads, so the hyper-exponential service of the M/G/c queue of the database servers queue above can be approximated with an M/M/n queue when the writer and the delete transactions are less or equal to 30% of the total transactions and the ecommerce website has read-mostly workloads. This is an interesting approximation with operational research.. But we can solve this problem of limiting the waiting-time or the response=time using windows timers, so as the websites users connect they will start a windows timers that correspond the limited waiting-time that we must constrain with, we will start a timer and push a callback function that will set a boolean flag to false if the limited waiting time required expired , that way we will avoid to model the websites with an M/G/c queue etc. and it's important to give more priority to the write transactions because that's critical for your pocket. Thank you for your time. Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 28 07:01PM -0400 Hello............ Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library version 1.64 Author: Amine Moulay Ramdane Description: This library contains a Scalable Parallel implementation of Conjugate Gradient Dense Linear System Solver library that is NUMA-aware and cache-aware, and it contains also a Scalable Parallel implementation of Conjugate Gradient Sparse Linear System Solver library that is cache-aware. Please download the zip file and read the readme file inside the zip to know how to use it. Language: GNU C++ and Visual C++ and C++Builder Operating Systems: Windows, Linux, Unix and Mac OS X on (x86) You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-parallel-c-conjugate-gradient-linear-system-solver-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 28 06:55PM -0400 Hello....... Universal Scalability Law program was updated to version 3.12 Now it compiles correctly on LLVM-based Delphi compilers.. Where also do you use it ? You use it for example to optimize more the cost/performance ratio on multicores and manycores. With -nlr option means that the problem will be solved with the mathematical nonlinear regression using the simplex method as a minimization, if you don't specify -nlr, the problem will be solved by default by the mathematical polynomial regression, and since it uses regression , you can use it for example to test your system on many more cores with just a few points, and after that using regression it searchs for the cost/performance ratio that is optimal for you. Please read more about my Universal Scalability Law for Delphi and FreePascal, it comes with a graphical and a command-line program. I have included a 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables called usl.exe and usl_graph.exe inside the zip, please read the readme file to know how to use it, it is a very powerful tool. You can read about it and download the new version 3.12 from here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 28 06:31PM -0400 Hello.... I am a computer programmer.. How to improve also quality and timeliness of software ? I was asking myself this question and i will present my thoughts: You have to abstract also the graph that offer a deeper insights into the nature of objects and the system. And this has to be done smartly.. The abstract graph of the system must reveal the following: 1- It has to reveal the hierarchy of roles and the breadths of those roles 2- It has to offer a deeper insights into the nature of the objects, the abstract graph must reveal easily the triads why-what-how. 3- the abstract graph must be clear and it has to clearly and efficiently and plainly communicates what the roles do. 4- It has to have a high unity, a role has high unity if all actions described in the role have one purpose. 5- You have to have a good coupling between objects and methods. This is the visibility and degree to which two objects or methods communicate with each other. This is the degree of interdependence between software modules, a measure of how closely connected two routines or modules are, it must be low coupling. A low coupling is a sign of well-structured software system Also i am an experienced programmer in parallel programming and synchronization algorithms, and here is some of my inventions: You have to appreciate my inventions of my C++ synchronization objects library.. Here is why: Here is the problem of optimistic Transactional memory: If there is more conflicts between reads and writes you have to rollback and to serialize also etc. and this will be less energy efficient and it will be less faster than pessimistic locking mechanisms So i think that my C++ Synchronization objects library and my Delphi synchronization objects are still really useful.. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/c-synchronization-objects-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment