- More clarification on Koran and terrorism - 1 Update
- Koran and terrorism - 1 Update
- You have to appreciate my inventions of my C++ synchronization objects library.. - 1 Update
- Hope you will be happy with my projects ! - 1 Update
- Compression and GPU and CPU - 1 Update
- Achieving Immortality by 2045 with AI and Biotech - 1 Update
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 25 04:47PM -0400 Hello................ More clarification on Koran and terrorism: ISIS has interpreted that "retribution for an evil act is an evil one like it" like: if you kill innocent people of us muslims, we will kill innocent people of you. But this is a delicate subject, because rationality and logic that analyse the following text of the Koran will say without any doubt that the intention of westerns etc. that kill on Irak and Syria is not killing innocent people, this is only Collateral damage , so terrorism of ISIS and Al-Qaida on innocent people is not allowed, and Koran says also that pardon and/or reconciliation is rewarded from Allah, so Koran is not the rule of an eye for an eye. Read again the Koran: "And the retribution for an evil act is an evil one like it, but whoever pardons and makes reconciliation - his reward is [due] from Allah . Indeed, He does not like wrongdoers." from the Surah Ash-Shuraa [42:40] of the Koran. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane,. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 25 04:24PM -0400 Hello..................... Please read again carefully my logical reasonning, i will precise more: About Koran and terrorism from an arab... I am an arab and i understand more the Koran... The problem of islamists terrorism is the problem of the an eye for an eye rule. So the question from rationality and logic, does Koran supports the rule of an eye for an eye ? Koran is not in accordance with this rule, because Koran says "And the retribution for an evil act is an evil one like it, but whoever pardons and makes reconciliation - his reward is [due] from Allah . Indeed, He does not like wrongdoers." from the Surah Ash-Shuraa [42:40] of the Koran. So the Koran is clear that an act of evil can be retributed with an act of evil like it, but it must be like it , that means that terrorism on innocent people is not allowed by the Koran, because the Koran says clearly that He doesn't like wrongdoers, that means the Koran and Allah doesn't like terrorism of Al-Qaida and ISIS on innocent people, and Koran says also that pardon and/or reconciliation is rewarded from Allah, so Koran is not the rule of an eye for an eye, so i don't think ISIS or Al-Qaida types of islamists are correct. So now you understand my rational view of an arab on this subject. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 25 03:32PM -0400 Hello......... You have to appreciate my inventions of my C++ synchronization objects library.. Here is why: Here is the problem of optimistic Transactional memory: If there is more conflicts between reads and writes you have to rollback and to serialize also etc. and this will be less energy efficient and it will be less faster than pessimistic locking mechanisms So i think that my C++ Synchronization objects library and my Delphi synchronization objects are still really useful.. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/c-synchronization-objects-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 25 02:52PM -0400 Hello....... I have just finished my project of my Object oriented library to do stackful coroutines.. You can download the new version 2.02 from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/object-oriented-stackful-coroutines-library-for-delphi-and-freepascal Also i am actually finishing a project that is a GUI archiver that looks like 7Zip GUI archiver, it is an archiver that uses my Parallel archiver and that supports Parallel Zstandard and Parallel LZ4 and Parallel LZMA, and that supports windows processor groups and that is NUMA-aware and NUMA efficient and that works on Win32 and Win64. My other projects that i have finished are actually more stable and really fast, you can be more confident with them, please feel free to download them from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/ Hope you will be happy with my projects ! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 25 02:22PM -0400 Hello.............. As you have noticed i have implemented my Parallel archiver and my Parallel compression library. Here they are: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/parallel-archiver and https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/parallel-compression-library Other than that you have to know that GPUs are basically vector processors, where you can be doing hundreds or thousands of ADD instructions all in lock step, and executing programs where there are very few data-dependent branches. Compression algorithms in general sound more like an SPMD (Single Program Multiple Data) or MIMD (Multiple Instruction Multiple Data) programming model, which is better suited to multicore cpus. Video compression algorithms can be accellerated by GPGPU processing like CUDA only to the extent that there is a very large number of pixel blocks that are being cosine-transformed or convolved (for motion detection) in parallel, and the IDCT or convolution subroutines can be expressed with branchless code. GPUs also like algorithms that have high numeric intensity (the ratio of math operations to memory accesses.) Algorithms with low numeric intensity (like adding two vectors) can be massively parallel and SIMD, but still run slower on the GPU than the CPU because they're memory bound. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 25 11:25AM -0400 Hello............. Look at this interesting video: Achieving Immortality by 2045 with AI and Biotech, Google Director Ray Kurzweil https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOECp158Tc8 Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment