- Communication, simplicity, feedback, respect - 1 Update
- About Beauty.. - 1 Update
- What is being an idiot ? - 1 Update
- I continu my proof - 1 Update
- Read again, i correct a typo - 1 Update
- The right definition - 1 Update
- About Greatness.. - 1 Update
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 01 08:07AM -0400 Hello.................... Communication, simplicity, feedback, respect Those are essentials steps also, you have to know how to communicate your your ideas and how to simplifying them correctly, and efficient communication is also efficient abstration, so you have to know how to decompose and how to abstract the essentials to be able to communicate efficiently, and this better realiability and correctness, feedback is also important, i mean like the testing phase, you have to improve your ideas layer by layer and incrementally using the patience of science , because as i have said your perception takes time to be correct perception , so you have to know how to be patience science waiting for your perception to be set correctly, this is in accordance with efficient morality and in accordance with Liberty. And how to improve also quality and timeliness of software ? I was asking myself this question and i will present my thoughts: You have to abstract also the graph that offer a deeper insights into the nature of objects and the system. And this has to be done smartly.. The abstract graph of the system must reveal the following: 1- It has to reveal the hierarchy of roles and the breadths of those roles 2- It has to offer a deeper insights into the nature of the objects, the abstract graph must reveal easily the triads why-what-how. 3- the abstract graph must be clear and it has to clearly and efficiently and plainly communicates what the roles do. 4- It has to have a high unity, a role has high unity if all actions described in the role have one purpose. 5- You have to have a good coupling between objects and methods. This is the visibility and degree to which two objects or methods communicate with each other. This is the degree of interdependence between software modules, a measure of how closely connected two routines or modules are, it must be low coupling. A low coupling is a sign of well-structured software system Also i am an experienced programmer in parallel programming and synchronization algorithms, and here is some of my inventions: You have to appreciate my inventions of my C++ synchronization objects library.. Here is why: Here is the problem of optimistic Transactional memory: If there is more conflicts between reads and writes you have to rollback and to serialize also etc. and this will be less energy efficient and it will be less faster than pessimistic locking mechanisms So i think that my C++ Synchronization objects library and my Delphi synchronization objects are still really useful.. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/c-synchronization-objects-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 31 07:17PM -0400 Hello...................... About Beauty.. Beauty is a generalization, like a general mathematical proof, so the definition of Beauty must be constrained by rationality and logic, and Elitist definition that lacks optimization will say that we must be beautiful like a Godzilla, but this is garbage because that's not Liberty of America, because Liberty is a generalization so it is efficient morality as i have explained it, so Liberty do constrain Beauty to be more efficient and to be optimization, so it is why we have not to forget that "tolerance" can become an heuristic that optimizes the economic system and the social system, so we must not be extreme in the definition of Beauty, like saying that arabs has to be as beautiful as white europeans, because this can hurt, firstly because arabs are like more tolerable , and this way we have not to forget that we are constrained by optimization , this is why we are allowing "tolerance" over immigration to be an heuristic that optimizes the system, but don't forget that the system is not idiotic because the system also has to not cause problems to societies , so it has to know how to balance, this is the game of today , we have to be professionalism that knows how to optimize the system and at how to infer efficient morality from the guidance of moral and empirical moral and a priori pure moral, so extreme definitions that lacks this optimization are not in accordance with optimization. What is dignity ? You have to have a sense of dignity, and a sense of dignity must come with a sense of decency. Dignity and decency guide morality in the right direction. But dignity and decency are constrained by rationality and logic. That means you have to define correctly dignity and decency. I think that i don't agree with neo-nazis. Because neo-nazis are more violent, and by being more violent they are loosing the sense of dignity and decency, like ISIS and Al-Qaida that are more violent people that hurt arabs and muslims, neo-nazism also hurts white european people. white europeans people are trying to be Decency and Dignity, those are generalizations, so we must think them like that, and i think that the definition of Liberty do include the right requirements for an efficient morality. The key point is how to make an effort of being stableness in the system, and stableness must be understood as taking care of reliability and correctness, this effort must take into account discipline and progress, but are we loosing our way by not being more mathematical precision ? i don't think so, because we are also constained by other mechanisms that provoke and bring more quality to the system, so the definition of being Liberty is efficient, but we are lucky also that others mechanisms do exist to bring more responsability and more quality to the system, and i have spoken about them on my political philosophy, also don't loose your way by not giving importance to the soft way of enforcing an efficient morality, that's also what i have spoken about, morality must be scrutinized and calculated like a scientist to be conform to the Spirit of Liberty. And what is being an idiot ? If you don't choose an efficient definition you are an idiot. Like when you say that America is nationalism, this lacks optimization, so it is idiotic thinking, you have to define the system, this is why i have defined America by an efficient definition that is Liberty , like the Statue of Liberty. Why have i defined the chinese system by: discipline , progress and stableness ? Because that's what say the chinese political representatives of the people of China, that they want to be: discipline , progress and stableness. So please read again: If you define the system like China: We will say that the system must be: discipline , progress and stableness. This is the chinese definition. And this definition, because of the presence of "stableness" in the definition, do ensure efficient morality that takes into account the empirical moral and the guidance of moral that knows how to be compassion and love to avoid extremism and violence and instability and lack of reliability, so the chinese definition is efficient morality. The definition of America is like the Statue of Liberty, it defines the system by the magical word Liberty. But this definition is not as clear as the chinese one, but the above requirements of discipline , progress and stableness are inherent to the definition of Liberty , because Liberty is a generalization, like proving by a general mathematical proofs, so you have to be discipline , progress and stableness to not hurt the system, and this is called Liberty, since when you hurt the system this way you can not call it Liberty, so as you have noticed the Statue of Liberty and Liberty is efficient morality that know how to infer efficient morality from the guidance of moral that is happiness that is the goal of philosophy and from empirical moral and from a priori pure moral. Discipline , progress and stableness are inherent to Liberty. But Liberty is not just defined as being stableness. The definition of discipline , progress and stableness is composition that ensure effort to be stableness that takes into account progress and discipline. So as you have noticed the definition of Statue of Liberty or Liberty is efficient morality that is smartness. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 31 04:58PM -0400 Hello................. What is being an idiot ? If you don't choose an efficient definition you are an idiot. Like when you say that America is nationalism, this lacks optimization, so it is idiotic thinking, you have to define the system, this is why i have defined America by an efficient definition that is Liberty , like the Statue of Liberty. Why have i defined the chinese system by: discipline , progress and stableness ? Because that's what say the chinese political representatives of the people of China, that they want to be: discipline , progress and stableness. So please read again: If you define the system like China: We will say that the system must be: discipline , progress and stableness. This is the chinese definition. And this definition, because of the presence of "stableness" in the definition, do ensure efficient morality that takes into account the empirical moral and the guidance of moral that knows how to be compassion and love to avoid extremism and violence and instability and lack of reliability, so the chinese definition is efficient morality. The definition of America is like the Statue of Liberty, it defines the system by the magical word Liberty. But this definition is not as clear as the chinese one, but the above requirements of discipline , progress and stableness are inherent the definition of Liberty , because Liberty is a generalization, like proving by a general mathematical proofs, so you have to be discipline , progress and stableness to not hurt the system, and this is called Liberty, since when you hurt the system this way you can not call it Liberty, so as you have noticed the Statue of Liberty and Liberty is efficient morality that know how to infer efficient morality from the guidance of moral that is happiness that is the goal of philosophy and from empirical moral and from a priori pure moral. Discipline , progress and stableness are inherent to Liberty. But Liberty is not just defined as being stableness. The definition of discipline , progress and stableness is composition that ensure effort to be stableness that takes into account progress and discipline. So as you have noticed the definition of Statue of Liberty or Liberty is efficient morality that is smartness. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 31 03:59PM -0400 Hello................ Discipline , progress and stableness are inherent to Liberty.. But Liberty is not just defined as being stableness. The definition of discipline , progress and stableness is composition that ensure effort to be stableness that takes into account progress and discipline. So as you have noticed the definition of Statue of Liberty or Liberty is efficient morality that is smartness. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 31 03:53PM -0400 Hello.................... Read again, i correct a typo If you define the system like China: We will say that the system must be: discipline , progress and stableness. This is the chinese definition. And this definition, because of the presence of "stableness" in the definition, do ensure efficient morality that takes into account the empirical moral and the guidance of moral that knows how to be compassion and love to avoid extremism and violence and instability and lack of reliability, so the chinese definition is efficient morality. The definition of America is like the Statue of Liberty, it defines the system by the magical word Liberty. But this definition is not as clear as the chinese one, but the above requirements of discipline , progress and stableness are inherent the definition of Liberty , because Liberty is a generalization, like proving by a general mathematical proofs, so you have to be discipline , progress and stableness to not hurt the system, and this is called Liberty, since when you hurt the system this way you can not call it Liberty, so as you have noticed the Statue of Liberty and Liberty is efficient morality that know how to infer efficient morality from the guidance of moral that is happiness that is the goal of philosophy and from empirical moral and from a priori pure moral. So as you have noticed the Statue of Liberty is efficient morality, so it is smartness. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 31 03:32PM -0400 Hello.................. If you define the system like China: We will say that the system must be: discipline , progress and stableness. This is the chinese definition. And this definition, because of the presence of "stableness" in the definition, do ensure efficient morality that takes into account the empirical moral and the guidance of moral that knows how to be compassion and love to avoid extremism and violence and unstability and lack of reliability, so the chinese definition is efficient morality. The definition of America is like the Statue of Liberty, it defines the system by the magical word Liberty. But this definition is not as clear as the chinese one, but the above requirements of discipline , progress and stableness are inherent the definition of Liberty , because Liberty is a generalization, like proving by a general mathematical proofs, so you have to be discipline , progress and stableness to not hurt the system, and this is called Liberty, since when you hurt the system this way you can not call it Liberty, so as you have noticed the Statue of Liberty and Liberty is efficient morality that know how to infer efficient morality from the guidance of moral that is happiness that is the goal of philosophy and from empirical moral and from a priori pure moral. So as you have noticed the Statue of Liberty is efficient morality, so it is smartness. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 31 02:38PM -0400 Hello.............. About Greatness.. Donald Trump wants America to be great again.. Neo-nazis want to be greatness too.. But this is not in accordance with Liberty or with Happiness. Because Greatness must be constrained today by optimization.. So you have to be capable of being Diplomacy.. What do you think is Diplomacy ? Do you think it is hating and hating like neo-nazis ? That's an inferior thinking.. Diplomacy must know how to be respect to higher consumer confidence index and to attract consumers and to be more security and reliability and corrrectness, so you have to know how to soften your manners of addressing others, you have to choose correct words that fulfill the above requirements.. This is the weakness also of nationalism that doesn't know how to manage correctly with efficient morality.. Because Liberty is a generalization, like a general mathematical proof, and since it is a generalization , so it is constrained by the guidance of moral and a priori pure moral and empirical moral, so you have to know how to manage yourself and how to manage the world. Please read also the following to know about my thoughts: About identity What is identity ? This is a really a good question.. You can say that you are a white europeans.. And you can say that i am a white arab that lives in Montreal Canada.. But that's lacking optimization.. Because i am not defined by just being a white arab.. I am also the content of a book on computer programming.. I am also a content of a book on operational research.. I am more professionalism that knows more, because i am also a computer programmer.. And i know more how to infer more efficient morality from Liberty.. And since Liberty is a generalization, like we generalize proofs in science.. So Liberty do include efficient morality, because without efficient morality , we can hurt ourselves and this can not be called Liberty.. And Liberty is efficient morality, and efficient morality is professionalism that knows better how to survive, it's professionalism that is more rationality and logic and more optimization, optimization is the back-bones of our civilization, because it's related to better surviving that is the goal of philosophy that is happiness, and since the goal of philosophy is happiness and it's a guidance of morality, this Happiness is also a generalization, so this generalization looks like the generalization that we call Liberty, Happiness and Liberty are magical words, in the sense that they include the necessary requirements of an efficient morality. But efficient morality can not ignore optimization that says says for example that respect and compassion and love higher the consumer confidence index, and the lack of respect and compassion and compassion does cause problems to the consumer confidence index, this is the basic rule also to how we must be also a decent economic investment in the third world countries , because a decent economic investment in third world countries attracts more consumers and higher the consumer confidence index, because we are an interconnected world today... So as you have noticed this is how i am inferring my identity, my identity is also defending the Statue of Liberty that say that Liberty is an efficient morality, and since i know more what is efficient morality, i am inclined to respect more my fellow americains and my fellow white europeans. Please reread also the following to understand more my thoughts: Yet about Liberty To define Liberty is like a generalization, it is like science.. We can not define Liberty by being fraternity or/and being equality That the magical word of Liberty. USA is represented with the Statue of Liberty that symbolizes Liberty. I give you an example: The neo-nazism wants to define white europeans civilization too extremelly, it's like too extreme justice of communism, but this is not optimization, because optimization has to take into account empirical moral that says that "tolerance" can become an heuristic that optimizes the economic system and the social system.. so being more tolerance over immigration as of accepting arabs immigrants as immigrants even if arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, this is the new optimization of today, so if we don't use this heuristic of "tolerance" this can not be called Liberty in USA. Please read my following to know more about Liberty that is an efficient morality , because Liberty must take into account the guidance of moral that is the goal of philosophy that is happiness and it must take into account a priori pure moral and it must take into account empirical moral to be an efficient morality. A more correct schema.. Hope you have read my previous post to understand better my thoughts.. Now i will ask you a question.. How to be more confident ? To be more confident you have to be more professionalism.. And more professionalism is constrained by rationality and logic.. So an important step is to define professionalism.. Professionalism can not be defined with the old conception.. Because professionalism of today is optimization that knows better how to survive.. We have to reject the old conception of Hitler and of the old communism because it was less optimization that lacks optimization of today.. You have to abstract the political philosophy.. Foe example when i say: Justice must constrain happiness and responsability must constrain justice that's not sufficient.. Because responsability is influenced by the variable of "tolerance" and "tolerance" can become an heuristic that optimizes the system, so if we are more "tolerance" we can attract consumers and higher the consumer confidence index and we can penetrate more the economic market of others, this is inferred from empirical moral and this is the preferred way of social Liberalism that wants to play this card.. and this inform us that morality is not just saying that Justice must constrain happiness and responsability must constrain justice, because that lacks empirical moral.. and you have to know how to decompose morality to be able to understand morality, morality is also the guidance of moral, so morality must be guided by the soft way of enforcing the quality of morality, like i have explained it in my previous post, and by enforcing the hard way the laws of morality.. and morality is also a priori pure moral inferred from reason,and morality is also empirical moral, such as saying that "tolerance" over responsability and over justice can become an heuristic that optimizes and better the economic system and the social system, or like saying that "tolerance" over immigration can become an heuristic that optimizes and better the economic system and the social system. Please reread my thoughts to understand more: What is the factors that create quality ? There is among them correctness and reliablity and also efficiency.. So you have to understand what is correctness and reliability and efficiency of the system or the political philosophy.. Efficiency is not saying since jews make more money, so jews are bad. Efficiency and reliability and correctness of the system must be abstracted like when we are abstracting the software with UML and IDAR.. And your abstraction must shows the essentials.. So when you are doing political philosophy that's the same.. You have to decompose correctly and abstract correctly and be efficient in your thinking.. Like when i say: How to provoke and bring quality to the political system and the system ? If you are blind you will say that it is futility.. But when you are smart you will say that it is an important question that must be answered.. How do you think we can bring quality to morality ? Remember with me the soft way and the hard way to bring quality to morality that i have discussed previously.. Without this perception and conception you will be like a blind person.. Blindness is not good for quality. So please read my following thoughts to be able to see what i am seing.. I am a white arab... I am a computer programmer and i have a diploma in Microelectronics and informatics.. What is the most important goal of my political philosophy? In my opinion the most important aim of my political philosophy is that as I have just explained that the idea in the Platonic sense has a very important characteristic, it is that one can perfect it and bring it to be more and more perfect or even perfect, then in my opinion the aim of my political philosophy it is to perfect ideas and to make them follow by the people, not only that, but these architectural and efficient and correct ideas of my political philosophy should be regarded as automata that should be executed to arrive at there efficient goals, now a question arises from it: how to encourage the people to execute these architectural ideas as executing automata to perfect more our world ? One of the ways to do this is what I have done in my political philosophy is to show that rationality and science and microprocessors and valuable advices etc. etc. are also as time machines that permit to travel in the future , that is the architectural ideas of my political philosophy and this architectural ideas of my political philosophy leads the people to perceive the world differently by giving for example more importance and high priority to science and efficient technics and technology, the other method is also to reinforce more these architectural ideas of my politicial philosophy to be able to enhance and perfect, as we are enforcing laws.. Please reread i have corrected more my typos to understand more my political philosophy: Can we travel back in time? Here is my thoughts that i have just wrote: It is a very interesting question that demands rationality and logical thinking to answer it ... To answer it, i start from a mathematical subject which is the mathematical arithmetic series. An arithmetic series has as its main characteristic that the difference between its terms is constant ... and that its sum gives (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), a_n being the last term ... now you have to be smart and notice with me that just before the final step of the final calculation that resulted as a general equation of the arithmetic series, the calculation of the arithmetic series required of us a much bigger time to solve the series .. But as soon as the result (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2 has been reached, the time for the resolution of the arithmetic series has greatly diminished, therefore the time preceding the resolution has compressed a lot and allowed us to travel in the the future quickly, the resolution of the arithmetic series which gave: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), it's like a wormhole in the universe permit us to time travel in the future more quickly, but understand with me that the time travel in the future that allows you to make the equation of (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is relative to the time taken previously by the arithmetic series just before the discovery of the equation (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), and thus that the universe is computable and that ultimately it allowed a time travel and thanks to mathematics that is something extra-ordinary in itself. Now I will be more logical and ask myself the following question: Is there any contradiction in my evidence since a car is not a machine to allow time travel in the future to the simple reason that the regions where we will travel and arrive faster with a car will not have aged in time that corresponds to the future time in which one arrives by the feet? I answer this in a more logical way: Notice that when I said that the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is a time travel machine that permits to travel in the future, because it is an equation that also predicts the result more quickly to which one arrives by paper without this equation, so the time has no hold on the theoretical result that is predicted faster so that there is no contradiction when it comes to theoretical prediction. Also when you use this invention That is this mathematical equation of the arithmetic series: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), it is that you are living the future of the one who has not yet invented or used this equation and who will arrive there in its future, therefore it is for this reason that this equation is also a time travel machine that permits to travel in the future and it has a predictive characteristic. So there is no contradiction and therefore we can consider a car as a time traveling machine to travel in the future, like the microprocessor, and like several other mathematical inventions as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series. Here is one of my conclusion: If you are traveling from Montreal to Paris by airplane, and that another person swims and walk by foot to Paris, and assume that the person who moves by swiming and walking wants to see Paris and answer some questions, And if you travel to Paris by plane and you answer these questions more quickly since you are going to see Paris more quickly than the person swimming and and walking , so that has a predictive character as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), since you will be able to send an email quickly to the person who wants to to swim and walk to Paris and give him the answers he's looking for, so you'll be able to see the answers of his future, and this predictive characteristic can be considered as a time travel machine that permits to travel in the future, so the aircraft and the car are like time travel machines that permit to travel in the future ... as well as the processors and other mathematical inventions and others... Rationality and logic also have a predictive characteristic, so you must also reason better in a more scientific manner and take into account the scientific and empirical evidence to be ahead of others, like a time machine that permits to travel in the future.. If a first person receives a valuable advice and this advice of value allows him to better control his future and to succeed in his life in the future by executing this valuable advice and also it allows him to predict his future, and besides, imagine that a second person will receive in its future this valuable advice, then the first person will be able to guess with CERTITUDE the future of the second person which will be the consequence of the execution of this valuable advice , and not only the first person will have lived the future of the second person before the second person, since the two will have lived the same event by the execution of this valuable advice, then in my opinion we must reason as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic and notice that since the first person will guess with CERTITUDE The future of the second person and will also live the future event of the second person, then those two theoretical and empirical evidences confirms that the first person has lived the future event of the second person, so this valuable advice could be called by mathematical approximation a time machine that permits to travel in the future, I say "approximation", because we by analogy are as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic, in addition to that, that the fact that the first person guesses with CERTITUDE the future of the second person, this informs in a logical manner that this certainty change our way of perceiving, for this certainty, even if it is not travel in |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment