- Determinsim and truth - 1 Update
- About the consistency of the system - 1 Update
- Read again.. - 1 Update
- More precision.. - 2 Updates
- About the semantic - 1 Update
- Read again... - 1 Update
- We have to use the correct semantic - 1 Update
- Read again, i correct because i write fast - 1 Update
- Here is my efficient solution - 1 Update
- Read again, i correct... - 1 Update
- The essence of measure.. - 1 Update
- The essence of the Truth - 1 Update
- About brain simulation... - 1 Update
- Why Hexascale computer and computing ? - 1 Update
- Hexascale computer and computing - 1 Update
- Please read again... - 1 Update
- Just-In-Time Compiler - 1 Update
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 09:55PM -0400 Hello......... I was thinking more, and here is my new thinking: Determinism easy for us to set the truth and sets the way of logic, and this truth and way of logic must be computed by our brain to create a consistent system that is efficient morality that is optimization that is performance and reliability. So there is some truth that hurts and some truth that is efficient morality that is optimization that we call tolerable or good, so the essence of truth is based on our essence that is our consciousness of space-time and the determinism of our empirical and physical world, and about the essence of logical consistency of the system, you can understand it by example like this: About the consistency of the system We call it consistency of the system.. When the system is: If A is smaller than B And B is smaller than C And if B is medium The system above doesn't allow to say that: A is smaller than B Because if you say that , it is as you are saying that A is smaller than B only, so that's a contradiction that hurts consistency of the system. And The system above doesn't allow to say that: B is smaller than C Because if you say that , it is as you are saying that B is smaller than C only, so that's a contradiction that hurts consistency of the system. So the system has to be consistent, so the system force you to say all at the same time: A is smaller than B B is smaller than C B is medium So that to be strict and clear to not create any contradiction. And about the essence of measure.. Philosophy is like mathematics.. I have talked about the essence of Truth in my previous post, hope you have read it carefully.. Now what is the essence of measure ? I think that the reference is the consciousness of space-time as i have explained, adjoined with the senses of measure that we have, such as the sense of orientation and the sense of measuring space and saying that this is bigger than this etc. those ingrediants permit us to measure, i will ask for example, what is a point (in geometry) ? to understand a point we must map it to our consciousness of space-time as i have explained, so this is rooted on the physical empirical world, even if we are using our senses of measure, so this is why i have explained that mathematical logic and the mathematical Set theory for example are also rooted on the physical and empirical world , but the space-time can be relative or general, relativeness permit also to measure the truth , but this seems to create some contradictions in the system, this has been showed in my writing and explanation of my previous post of what is the essence of love and what is love, but i have showed that this can be resolved by using the reference of the general morality of the society as the reference that permits to measure and that must be enforced by laws and police. The essence of the Truth What is a Truth ? what is the essence of the Truth ? That's an important question.. Philosophy is like mathematics, because Philosophy must be based on efficient morality and efficient morality is optimization and optimization is performance and reliability. So if you look at mathematical logic.. What is mathematical logic ? Mathematical logic is also being conscious and feeling the space-time.. Here is why: Now I will give my explanation of what is consciousness... I hope that in my previous messages you have understood my explanation of how the consciousness of time is generated by our brain, I have said that the brain has a sense of direction that makes it possible to say that one object is left or on the right and back or front etc., and the brain is also able to see space in 3 dimensions with the sense of the gaze for example, that is to say to give coordinates as cartesian or polar in three dimensions to objects in the space of reality, and also the brain by means of the sense of touch and the eye is capable of the sense of the measurement of the magnitudes in the space of reality, these are ingredients of the brain which gives birth to the consciousness of time, for consciousness of time means that for two objects that follow each other, we are able to feel the existence in space of the back of the first object (by the sens of the orientation of the brain) Which is for example "nothing", and that one also feels the existence in the space of the back of the second object which is the first object, and that we are therefore able to associate the back of the second object to the word "before", and this is how the consciousness of time is engendered ... now i come to a question even more important, but what is consciousness really? i start with an example so that you can understand what it really is: when you touch your hands with water very hot, you are able to feel the pain and to say that it is you who feel the pain, so the meaning of touch is closely linked to the consciousness of the "I", but Let us return, if you like, to the experiences of a child, you will notice that a necessary condition for the child to be able to learn and understand is to be able to ask the question of "what is", but you see this question has as a necessary condition the consciousness of the self, for when the child arises, question of "what is" is that it would mean: "I would like to know what it is", and the "I would like to know" demonstrates the presence of a consciousness of the pre-ego which guide the questioning of the child, but then what is this awareness of the pre-ego that guides the questioning that makes a consciousness too? Here is my answer: I believe that as in the case of the sense of touch which is in close relationship with the consciousness of the ego, the act of reflection is also a sens as the sens of touch that is able to make us feel that we exist and feel the space in three dimensions, as for touching the very warm water that allows us to feel that the feeling of hot water hurts us ... what would I like to say? that the sens of touch and the sens of smell for example are adjoined to space-time to give a better consciousness of space-time, that is, the ideas we have of space-time are not , for example, just rules of logic, but also are recorded with sensations of touch and other sensations to give a better consciousness, so the act of reflection is not just able to logically reason with simple rules of logic for building more complex logic rules etc. But it is also capable of associating space-time sensations with objects that are displaced in a 3-dimensional world, and therefore my theory makes us see the act of thought as also being also another sens that resembles the sens of touch , this is my explanation of how the consciousness and consciousness of the ego is engendered by the brain. When you say in mathematical logic: A or B How do you think you understand this logical rule? You must go back to your childhood when you were to learn it, you were told for example there are two balls, and you had to take just one and give it back, and the teacher made us understand for example the following: when you want to take two balls you are informed with gestures that it is NO, And when you just take one and turn the ball back, you get to know that it is YES, therefore I affirm that it is thanks to the existence of space-time which is also a consequence of our interior sensation of the space-time which gives the consciousness of space-time, I mean you are able for example with your brain to feel and understand what BEFORE or BEHIND Or LEFT or RIGHT, and you are able to feel the space and to say that it exists and what it is, so you are able to feel the space-time, and this sensation in our brain that we have of space-time helps us to understand the logical rule of: A or B, or the logical rule of: A and B. So let us return to the following theorem in mathematical logic: If A then B, and if B then C, then A then C. So how do you understand the: If A then B? As in my explanation above, you can not understand this rule without being conscious and without feeling space-time, because even if you are a blind person, you can feel your individuality and your singularity which is the consciousness of the ego, and this self-consciousness is a consequence of the sensation in our brain of space-time that allows us to feel that the object which is "WE" is different from other objects etc. Then what makes even the blind man feels the space-time and is capable to say that this object is before that object in time, So it is able to understand the logical rule of: If A then B, and since he is capable of doing so, he is capable, thanks to the sensation of the space-time that we have in our brain, that permit us to understand The following theorem: If A then B, and if B then C, then A then C. This is my evidence based on the empirical facts and this proves that mathematical logic is also a consequence of the sensation that we have in our brain of space-time, without this sensation we can not, in my opinion, understand mathematical logic, and since the machine is incapable of feeling like a human being space-time, then we can not say that artificial intelligence Is capable of achieving the emergence of consciousness. Now what is the truth ? In mathematical logic the truth is rooted on our consciousness and feeling of space-time as i have explained, so the reference is space-time, so we are capable of deducting the truth by mapping mathematical logic to our consciousness and our feeling of the space-time, this is i think the reference that permit to measure the Truth and define the Truth. And in the mathematical Set theory that's the same as logic. Also the reference is important, the reference can be general or it can be relative, as i have explained by: Getting more rational... Today i will ask a question of: what is love ? And the answer must be more rational. So we have to use smartness.. Like the theorems of Kurt Gödel, there is something that seems happening.. If you say that there is still some suffering in your life.. You can come to a deductive conclusion that it is not love. But if you choose a reference as being one person that is suffering more than you, you will conclude that your "some" suffering is considered to be part of good, and this good is part of love. So as you have noticed there seems like there is a contradiction in the system.. But this is just our senses, my rationality says that if the reference is individual morality, so the person above will say that some suffering is not love. But if the reference is general morality of the society, you will say that this some suffering is considered to be part of good, so it is part of love. So this relativeness to the general reference that is general of morality of the society is a good measure i think. It is like when we are asking the questions of: What is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ? I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality. How it can measure it? Optimization is performance and reliability, and Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance, so it is related to the essence of quality, so today because of our own essence that knows also about quality, we are measuring corruption of morality by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, and we are measuring craziness and foolishness by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, so if the level or degree of quality is lower and not tolerable, we say that it is corruption of morality or it is craziness or foolishness. How can we measure the level and degree of quality ? It is like saying that such thing is relative to such thing, also it is a process that is dynamic, so if our civilization is at time t1 is more performant and more reliable, we say that this degree of more reliable and more performant is the level or degree of quality that measures corruption of morality. So optimization that is performance and reliability measures corruption of morality in a such way. I give you an example.. If at time t1 our civilization has only one machine or robot, and this civilization and one robot or one machine are capable of being more performance and more reliability with this one robot or one machine, but they are doing less performance and less reliability, we call this corruption of morality. About the essence of the language of love.. The language of love is love.. But what is the language of love ? You will say that such song of the Beatles is love.. But this is narrow view that doesn't answer the question of what is the essence of the language of love.. The relativeness to the general reference that is general morality of the society is a good measure to measure love, as i said before So the essence of the language of love must be rooted on general morality that must be efficient morality, and efficient morality must be optimization that is performance and reliability. So as you see I am speaking right now the language of love.. So you hear for example that: Justice must constrain happiness and responsability must constrain justice, that's not the language of love.. because that's not a correct view, because we are constrained by empirical moral that says that a kind of tolerance over responsability plays the role of an heuristic that optimizes our economic system and our social system, like when we are applying a kind of tolerance over arab immigrants that are useful to the economic system and to the social system, so usefulness is the key point also that optimizes the system and that constrain the system to be a kind of tolerance over responsbility by not saying that arab immigrants are not as beautiful as white europeans and be discrimination with them, that's not the language of love, because the language of love is also optimization that mandate a kind of tolerance over responsability, this is the same when i say that optimization is the language of love also , because we must know how to be compassion and respect and love towards arabs and africans to attract consumers and to higher consumer confidence index, also democracy is subjected to a constrain of financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, this is a counter-power that creates more quality and more world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility. So as you see optimization is the language of love. And what is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ? I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality. How it can measure it? |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 08:24PM -0400 Hello................ About the consistency of the system We call it consistency of the system.. When the system is: Here is the system: If A is smaller than B And B is smaller than C And if B is medium The system above doesn't allow to say that: A is smaller than B Because if you say that , it is as you are saying that A is smaller than B only, so that's a contradiction that hurts consistency of the system. And The system above doesn't allow to say that: B is smaller than C Because if you say that , it is as you are saying that B is smaller than C only, so that's a contradiction that hurts consistency of the system. So the system has to be consistent, so the system force you to say all at the same time: A is smaller than B B is smaller than C B is medium So that to be strict and clear to not create any contradiction. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 08:06PM -0400 Hello..................... More precision.. Here is the source of my previous error on defining the semantic: When the system is: Here is the system: If A is smaller than B And B is smaller than C And if B is medium The system above doesn't allow to say that: A is smaller than B And The system above doesn't allow to say that: B is smaller than C The system force you to say all at the same time: A is smaller than B B is smaller than C B is medium Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 03:33PM -0400 Hello.............. More precision.. The essence of measure.. Philosophy is like mathematics.. I have talked about the essence of Truth in my previous post, hope you have read it carefully.. Now what is the essence of measure ? I think that the reference is the consciousness of space-time as i have explained, adjoined with the senses of measure that we have, such as the sense of orientation and the sense of measuring space and saying that this is bigger than this etc. those ingrediants permit us to measure, i will ask for example, what is a point (in geometry) ? to understand a point we must map it to our consciousness of space-time as i have explained, so this is rooted on the physical empirical world, even if we are using our senses of measure, so this is why i have explained that mathematical logic and the mathematical Set theory for example are also rooted like mathematical logic on the physical an empirical world , but the space-time can be relative or general, relativeness permit also to measure the truth , but this seems to create some contradictions in the system, this has been showed in my writing and explanation of my previous post of what is the essence of love and what is love, but i have showed that this contradiction in the system is resolved by using the reference of the general morality of the society as the reference that permits to measure and that must be enforced by laws and police. Thank you for your time. Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 08:02PM -0400 Hello...... Here is the source of my previous error on defining the semantic: When the system is: Here is the system: If A is smaller than B And B is smaller than C And if B is medium The system above doesn't allow to say that: A is smaller than B And The system above doesn't allow to say that: B is smaller than C The system force you to say all in the same time: A is smaller than B B is smaller than C B is medium Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 07:12PM -0400 Hello................ Here is the system: If A is smaller than B And B is smaller than C And if B is medium My previous reasoning was correct because, i was defining medium as being medium only, so that's semantic, so this semantic changes the meaning, so this is why it introduces a contradiction , because B is also smaller than C, thus the semantic dictates, this is why i have defined the correct semantic by being that medium means also that it smaller than C. so the semantic is important. This was the source of the problem of the contradiction that was introduced in the system. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 06:51PM -0400 Hello...... We have to use the correct semantic, that means the meaning, that means if the system is complete and it is: If A is smaller than B And B is smaller than C And if B is medium That means we can not allow that B is smaller. Because if you say that B is smaller, the semantic is not correct, because B is not just smaller, and that's strict logic ! So B must be medium , because the semantic of calling it medium means also that it is smaller than C. So using this correct semantic we avoid the previous problem. So mathematics is strict. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 06:46PM -0400 Hello.......... We have to use the correct semantic, that means the meaning, that means if the system is complete and it is: If A is smaller than B And B is smaller than C And if B is medium That means we can not allow that B is smaller. Because if you say that B is smaller, the semantic is not correct, because B is not just smaller, that strict logic. So B must be medium , because the semantic of calling it medium means also that it is smaller than C. So using this correct semantic we avoid the previous problem. So mathematics is strict. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 05:31PM -0400 Hello................ Read again, i correct because i write fast Here is another solution that is more accurate: If A is smaller than B And B is smaller than C Relativeness can say: B is medium. Or B is smaller. But you have to look at the completeness of the system, so if the system is complete, and B is medium, so saying B is medium is more important than saying B is smaller. But even if the system is complete, you can by using fuzziness, using tolerance, say that B is still smaller even if B is medium, so fuzziness of tolerance avoid dictatorship of logic that is strict but is less realistic. That's the correct view i think, so the problem is solved i think. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 04:56PM -0400 Hello............... I have just wrote this: ====================================== Relativeness as a measure of the truth If we have A is smaller than B and B is smaller than C By using the general consciousness as a rule of measure , you can say that B is medium. But if you use relativenness: you can say that B is smaller. This is a contradiction that is created by the relativeness that measures.. So where is logic here ? Logic as a measure can not resolve this contradiction ========================================= I think that logic is weak here, because logic is a part of the general measure that measures the truth, but it is not a general measure, you have to add the measure of mathematical and numeric calculations, and say for example that saying medium is more important than saying smaller, like when I have resolved the question of what is the essence of love. Please read all my following thoughts to understand: The essence of measure.. Philosophy is like mathematics.. I have talked about the essence of Truth in my previous post, hope you have read it carefully.. Now what is the essence of measure ? I think that the reference is the consciousness of space-time as i have explained, adjoined with the senses of measure that we have, such as the sense of orientation and the sense of measuring space and saying that this is bigger than this etc. those ingrediants permit us to measure, i will ask for example, what is a point (in geometry) ? to understand a point we must map it to our consciousness of space-time as i have explained, so this is rooted on the physical empirical world, even if we are using our senses of measure, so this is why i have explained that mathematical logic and the mathematical Set theory for example are also rooted like mathematical logic on the physical an empirical world , but the space-time can be relative or general, relativeness permit also to measure the truth , but this seems to create some contradictions in the system, this has been showed in my writing and explanation of my previous post of what is the essence of love and what is love, but i have showed that this contradiction in the system is resolved by using the reference of the general morality of the society as the reference that permits to measure and that must be enforced by laws and police. The essence of the Truth What is a Truth ? what is the essence of the Truth ? That's an important question.. Philosophy is like mathematics, because Philosophy must be based on efficient morality and efficient morality is optimization and optimization is performance and reliability. So if you look at mathematical logic.. What is mathematical logic ? Mathematical logic is also being conscious and feeling the space-time.. Here is why: Now I will give my explanation of what is consciousness... I hope that in my previous messages you have understood my explanation of how the consciousness of time is generated by our brain, I have said that the brain has a sense of direction that makes it possible to say that one object is left or on the right and back or front etc., and the brain is also able to see space in 3 dimensions with the sense of the gaze for example, that is to say to give coordinates as cartesian or polar in three dimensions to objects in the space of reality, and also the brain by means of the sense of touch and the eye is capable of the sense of the measurement of the magnitudes in the space of reality, these are ingredients of the brain which gives birth to the consciousness of time, for consciousness of time means that for two objects that follow each other, we are able to feel the existence in space of the back of the first object (by the sens of the orientation of the brain) Which is for example "nothing", and that one also feels the existence in the space of the back of the second object which is the first object, and that we are therefore able to associate the back of the second object to the word "before", and this is how the consciousness of time is engendered ... now i come to a question even more important, but what is consciousness really? i start with an example so that you can understand what it really is: when you touch your hands with water very hot, you are able to feel the pain and to say that it is you who feel the pain, so the meaning of touch is closely linked to the consciousness of the "I", but Let us return, if you like, to the experiences of a child, you will notice that a necessary condition for the child to be able to learn and understand is to be able to ask the question of "what is", but you see this question has as a necessary condition the consciousness of the self, for when the child arises, question of "what is" is that it would mean: "I would like to know what it is", and the "I would like to know" demonstrates the presence of a consciousness of the pre-ego which guide the questioning of the child, but then what is this awareness of the pre-ego that guides the questioning that makes a consciousness too? Here is my answer: I believe that as in the case of the sense of touch which is in close relationship with the consciousness of the ego, the act of reflection is also a sens as the sens of touch that is able to make us feel that we exist and feel the space in three dimensions, as for touching the very warm water that allows us to feel that the feeling of hot water hurts us ... what would I like to say? that the sens of touch and the sens of smell for example are adjoined to space-time to give a better consciousness of space-time, that is, the ideas we have of space-time are not , for example, just rules of logic, but also are recorded with sensations of touch and other sensations to give a better consciousness, so the act of reflection is not just able to logically reason with simple rules of logic for building more complex logic rules etc. But it is also capable of associating space-time sensations with objects that are displaced in a 3-dimensional world, and therefore my theory makes us see the act of thought as also being also another sens that resembles the sens of touch , this is my explanation of how the consciousness and consciousness of the ego is engendered by the brain. When you say in mathematical logic: A or B How do you think you understand this logical rule? You must go back to your childhood when you were to learn it, you were told for example there are two balls, and you had to take just one and give it back, and the teacher made us understand for example the following: when you want to take two balls you are informed with gestures that it is NO, And when you just take one and turn the ball back, you get to know that it is YES, therefore I affirm that it is thanks to the existence of space-time which is also a consequence of our interior sensation of the space-time which gives the consciousness of space-time, I mean you are able for example with your brain to feel and understand what BEFORE or BEHIND Or LEFT or RIGHT, and you are able to feel the space and to say that it exists and what it is, so you are able to feel the space-time, and this sensation in our brain that we have of space-time helps us to understand the logical rule of: A or B, or the logical rule of: A and B. So let us return to the following theorem in mathematical logic: If A then B, and if B then C, then A then C. So how do you understand the: If A then B? As in my explanation above, you can not understand this rule without being conscious and without feeling space-time, because even if you are a blind person, you can feel your individuality and your singularity which is the consciousness of the ego, and this self-consciousness is a consequence of the sensation in our brain of space-time that allows us to feel that the object which is "WE" is different from other objects etc. Then what makes even the blind man feels the space-time and is capable to say that this object is before that object in time, So it is able to understand the logical rule of: If A then B, and since he is capable of doing so, he is capable, thanks to the sensation of the space-time that we have in our brain, that permit us to understand The following theorem: If A then B, and if B then C, then A then C. This is my evidence based on the empirical facts and this proves that mathematical logic is also a consequence of the sensation that we have in our brain of space-time, without this sensation we can not, in my opinion, understand mathematical logic, and since the machine is incapable of feeling like a human being space-time, then we can not say that artificial intelligence Is capable of achieving the emergence of consciousness. Now what is the truth ? In mathematical logic the truth is rooted on our consciousness and feeling of space-time as i have explained, so the reference is space-time, so we are capable of deducting the truth by mapping mathematical logic to our consciousness and our feeling of the space-time, this is i think the reference that permit to measure the Truth and define the Truth. And in the mathematical Set theory that's the same as logic. Also the reference is important, the reference can be general or it can be relative, as i have explained by: Getting more rational... Today i will ask a question of: what is love ? And the answer must be more rational. So we have to use smartness.. Like the theorems of Kurt Gödel, there is something that seems happening.. If you say that there is still some suffering in your life.. You can come to a deductive conclusion that it is not love. But if you choose a reference as being one person that is suffering more than you, you will conclude that your "some" suffering is considered to be part of good, and this good is part of love. So as you have noticed there seems like there is a contradiction in the system.. But this is just our senses, my rationality says that if the reference is individual morality, so the person above will say that some suffering is not love. But if the reference is general morality of the society, you will say that this some suffering is considered to be part of good, so it is part of love. So this relativeness to the general reference that is general of morality of the society is a good measure i think. It is like when we are asking the questions of: What is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ? I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality. How it can measure it? Optimization is performance and reliability, and Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance, so it is related to the essence of quality, so today because of our own essence that knows also about quality, we are measuring corruption of morality by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, and we are measuring craziness and foolishness by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, so if the level or degree of quality is lower and not tolerable, we say that it is corruption of morality or it is craziness or foolishness. How can we measure the level and degree of quality ? It is like saying that such thing is relative to such thing, also it is a process that is dynamic, so if our civilization is at time t1 is more performant and more reliable, we say that this degree of more reliable and more performant is the level or degree of quality that measures corruption of morality. So optimization that is performance and reliability measures corruption of morality in a such way. I give you an example.. If at time t1 our civilization has only one machine or robot, and this civilization and one robot or one machine are capable of being more performance and more reliability with this one robot or one machine, but they are doing less performance and less reliability, we call this corruption of morality. About the essence of the language of love.. The language of love is love.. But what is the language of love ? You will say that such song of the Beatles is love.. But this is narrow view that doesn't answer the question of what is the essence of the language of love.. The relativeness to the general reference that is general morality of the society is a good measure to measure love, as i said before So the essence of the language of love must be rooted on general morality that must be efficient morality, and efficient morality must be optimization that is performance and reliability. So as you see I am speaking right now the language of love.. So you hear for example that: Justice must constrain happiness and responsability must constrain justice, that's not the language of love.. because that's not a correct view, because we are constrained by empirical moral that says that a kind of tolerance over responsability plays the role of an heuristic that optimizes our economic system and our social system, like when we are applying a kind of tolerance over arab immigrants that are useful to the economic system and to the social system, so usefulness is the key point also that optimizes the system and that constrain the system to be a kind of tolerance over responsbility by not saying that arab immigrants are not as beautiful as white europeans and be discrimination with them, that's not the language of love, because the language of love is also optimization that mandate a kind of tolerance over responsability, this is the same when i say that optimization is the language of love also , because we must know how to be compassion and respect and love towards arabs and africans to attract consumers and to higher consumer confidence index, also democracy is subjected to a constrain of financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, this is a counter-power that creates more quality and more world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility. So as you see optimization is the language of love. And what is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ? I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality. How it can measure it? Optimization is performance and reliability, and Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance, so it is related to the essence of quality, so today because of our own essence that knows also about quality, we are measuring corruption of morality by the level or degree of quality, that means by |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 04:30PM -0400 Hello................... Read again, i correct... Relativeness as a measure of the truth If we have A is smaller than B and B is smaller than C By using the general consciousness as a rule of measure , you can say that B is medium. But if you use relativenness: you can say that B is smaller. This is a contradiction that is created by the relativeness that measures.. So where is logic here ? Logic as a measure can not resolve this contradiction But if consciousness of space-time is the measure, you will resolve this contradiction by using force and dictatorship. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 03:28PM -0400 Hello.............. The essence of measure.. Philosophy is like mathematics.. I have talked about the essence of Truth in my previous post, hope you have read it carefully.. Now what is the essence of measure ? I think that the reference is the consciousness of space-time as i have explained, adjoined with the senses of measure that we have, such as the sense of orientation and the sense of measuring space and saying that this is bigger than this etc. those ingrediants permit us to measure, i will ask for example, what is a point ? to understand a point we must map it to our consciousness of space-time as i have explained, so this is rooted on the physical empirical world, even if we are using our senses of measure, so this is why i have explained that mathematical logic and the mathematical Set theory for example are also rooted like mathematical logic on the physical an empirical world , but the space-time can be relative or general, relativeness permit also to measure the truth , but this seems to create some contradictions in the system, this has been showed in my writing and explanation of my previous post of what is the essence of love and what is love, but i have showed that this contradiction in the system is resolved by using the reference of the general morality of the society as the reference that permits to measure and that must be enforced by laws and police. Thank you for your time. Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 02:13PM -0400 Hello.............. You have to read all my following post to understand correctly: The essence of the Truth What is a Truth ? what is the essence of the Truth ? That's an important question.. Philosophy is like mathematics, because Philosophy must be based on efficient morality and efficient morality is optimization and optimization is performance and reliability. So if you look at mathematical logic.. What is mathematical logic ? Mathematical logic is also being conscious and feeling the space-time.. Here is why: Now I will give my explanation of what is consciousness... I hope that in my previous messages you have understood my explanation of how the consciousness of time is generated by our brain, I have said that the brain has a sense of direction that makes it possible to say that one object is left or on the right and back or front etc., and the brain is also able to see space in 3 dimensions with the sense of the gaze for example, that is to say to give coordinates as cartesian or polar in three dimensions to objects in the space of reality, and also the brain by means of the sense of touch and the eye is capable of the sense of the measurement of the magnitudes in the space of reality, these are ingredients of the brain which gives birth to the consciousness of time, for consciousness of time means that for two objects that follow each other, we are able to feel the existence in space of the back of the first object (by the sens of the orientation of the brain) Which is for example "nothing", and that one also feels the existence in the space of the back of the second object which is the first object, and that we are therefore able to associate the back of the second object to the word "before", and this is how the consciousness of time is engendered ... now i come to a question even more important, but what is consciousness really? i start with an example so that you can understand what it really is: when you touch your hands with water very hot, you are able to feel the pain and to say that it is you who feel the pain, so the meaning of touch is closely linked to the consciousness of the "I", but Let us return, if you like, to the experiences of a child, you will notice that a necessary condition for the child to be able to learn and understand is to be able to ask the question of "what is", but you see this question has as a necessary condition the consciousness of the self, for when the child arises, question of "what is" is that it would mean: "I would like to know what it is", and the "I would like to know" demonstrates the presence of a consciousness of the pre-ego which guide the questioning of the child, but then what is this awareness of the pre-ego that guides the questioning that makes a consciousness too? Here is my answer: I believe that as in the case of the sense of touch which is in close relationship with the consciousness of the ego, the act of reflection is also a sens as the sens of touch that is able to make us feel that we exist and feel the space in three dimensions, as for touching the very warm water that allows us to feel that the feeling of hot water hurts us ... what would I like to say? that the sens of touch and the sens of smell for example are adjoined to space-time to give a better consciousness of space-time, that is, the ideas we have of space-time are not , for example, just rules of logic, but also are recorded with sensations of touch and other sensations to give a better consciousness, so the act of reflection is not just able to logically reason with simple rules of logic for building more complex logic rules etc. But it is also capable of associating space-time sensations with objects that are displaced in a 3-dimensional world, and therefore my theory makes us see the act of thought as also being also another sens that resembles the sens of touch , this is my explanation of how the consciousness and consciousness of the ego is engendered by the brain. When you say in mathematical logic: A or B How do you think you understand this logical rule? You must go back to your childhood when you were to learn it, you were told for example there are two balls, and you had to take just one and give it back, and the teacher made us understand for example the following: when you want to take two balls you are informed with gestures that it is NO, And when you just take one and turn the ball back, you get to know that it is YES, therefore I affirm that it is thanks to the existence of space-time which is also a consequence of our interior sensation of the space-time which gives the consciousness of space-time, I mean you are able for example with your brain to feel and understand what BEFORE or BEHIND Or LEFT or RIGHT, and you are able to feel the space and to say that it exists and what it is, so you are able to feel the space-time, and this sensation in our brain that we have of space-time helps us to understand the logical rule of: A or B, or the logical rule of: A and B. So let us return to the following theorem in mathematical logic: If A then B, and if B then C, then A then C. So how do you understand the: If A then B? As in my explanation above, you can not understand this rule without being conscious and without feeling space-time, because even if you are a blind person, you can feel your individuality and your singularity which is the consciousness of the ego, and this self-consciousness is a consequence of the sensation in our brain of space-time that allows us to feel that the object which is "WE" is different from other objects etc. Then what makes even the blind man feels the space-time and is capable to say that this object is before that object in time, So it is able to understand the logical rule of: If A then B, and since he is capable of doing so, he is capable, thanks to the sensation of the space-time that we have in our brain, that permit us to understand The following theorem: If A then B, and if B then C, then A then C. This is my evidence based on the empirical facts and this proves that mathematical logic is also a consequence of the sensation that we have in our brain of space-time, without this sensation we can not, in my opinion, understand mathematical logic, and since the machine is incapable of feeling like a human being space-time, then we can not say that artificial intelligence Is capable of achieving the emergence of consciousness. Now what is the truth ? In mathematical logic the truth is rooted on our consciousness and feeling of space-time as i have explained, so the reference is space-time, so we are capable of deducting the truth by mapping mathematical logic to our consciousness and our feeling of the space-time, this is i think the reference that permit to measure the Truth and define the Truth. And in the mathematical Set theory that's the same as logic. Also the reference is important, the reference can be general or it can be relative, as i have explained by: Getting more rational... Today i will ask a question of: what is love ? And the answer must be more rational. So we have to use smartness.. Like the theorems of Kurt Gödel, there is something that seems happening.. If you say that there is still some suffering in your life.. You can come to a deductive conclusion that it is not love. But if you choose a reference as being one person that is suffering more than you, you will conclude that your "some" suffering is considered to be part of good, and this good is part of love. So as you have noticed there seems like there is a contradiction in the system.. But this is just our senses, my rationality says that if the reference is individual morality, so the person above will say that some suffering is not love. But if the reference is general morality of the society, you will say that this some suffering is considered to be part of good, so it is part of love. So this relativeness to the general reference that is general of morality of the society is a good measure i think. It is like when we are asking the questions of: What is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ? I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality. How it can measure it? Optimization is performance and reliability, and Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance, so it is related to the essence of quality, so today because of our own essence that knows also about quality, we are measuring corruption of morality by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, and we are measuring craziness and foolishness by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, so if the level or degree of quality is lower and not tolerable, we say that it is corruption of morality or it is craziness or foolishness. How can we measure the level and degree of quality ? It is like saying that such thing is relative to such thing, also it is a process that is dynamic, so if our civilization is at time t1 is more performant and more reliable, we say that this degree of more reliable and more performant is the level or degree of quality that measures corruption of morality. So optimization that is performance and reliability measures corruption of morality in a such way. I give you an example.. If at time t1 our civilization has only one machine or robot, and this civilization and one robot or one machine are capable of being more performance and more reliability with this one robot or one machine, but they are doing less performance and less reliability, we call this corruption of morality. About the essence of the language of love.. The language of love is love.. But what is the language of love ? You will say that such song of the Beatles is love.. But this is narrow view that doesn't answer the question of what is the essence of the language of love.. The relativeness to the general reference that is general morality of the society is a good measure to measure love, as i said before So the essence of the language of love must be rooted on general morality that must be efficient morality, and efficient morality must be optimization that is performance and reliability. So as you see I am speaking right now the language of love.. So you hear for example that: Justice must constrain happiness and responsability must constrain justice, that's not the language of love.. because that's not a correct view, because we are constrained by empirical moral that says that a kind of tolerance over responsability plays the role of an heuristic that optimizes our economic system and our social system, like when we are applying a kind of tolerance over arab immigrants that are useful to the economic system and to the social system, so usefulness is the key point also that optimizes the system and that constrain the system to be a kind of tolerance over responsbility by not saying that arab immigrants are not as beautiful as white europeans and be discrimination with them, that's not the language of love, because the language of love is also optimization that mandate a kind of tolerance over responsability, this is the same when i say that optimization is the language of love also , because we must know how to be compassion and respect and love towards arabs and africans to attract consumers and to higher consumer confidence index, also democracy is subjected to a constrain of financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, this is a counter-power that creates more quality and more world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility. So as you see optimization is the language of love. And what is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ? I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality. How it can measure it? Optimization is performance and reliability, and Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance, so it is related to the essence of quality, so today because of our own essence that knows also about quality, we are measuring corruption of morality by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, and we are measuring craziness and foolishness by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, so if the level or degree of quality is lower and not tolerable, we say that it is corruption of morality or it is craziness or foolishness. How can we measure the level and degree of quality ? It is like saying that such thing is relative to such thing, also it is a process that is dynamic, so if our civilization is at time t1 is more performant and more reliable, we say that this degree of more reliable and more performant is the level or degree of quality that measures corruption of morality. So optimization that is performance and reliability measures corruption of morality in a such way. I give you an example.. If at time t1 our civilization has only one machine or robot, and this civilization and one robot or one machine are capable of being more performance and more reliability with this one robot or one machine, but they are doing less performance and less reliability, we call this corruption of morality. Communication, simplicity, feedback, respect Those are essentials steps also, you have to know how to communicate your your ideas and how to simplifying them correctly, and efficient communication is also efficient abstration, so you have to know how to decompose and how to abstract the essentials to be able to communicate efficiently, and this better reliability and correctness, feedback is also important, i mean like the testing phase, you have to improve your ideas layer by layer and incrementally using the patience of science , because as i have said your perception takes time to be correct perception , so you have to know how to be patience of science waiting for your perception to be set correctly, this is in accordance with efficient morality and in accordance with Liberty. So as you have seen we have to be able to think correctly using the tools of logic and rationality, like the following: Deductive reasoning is when, given certain premises, conclusions are unavoidably implied. Rules of inference are used to infer conclusions such as, modus ponens, where given "A" and "If A then B", then "B" must be concluded. And you have to take into account the |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 01:37PM -0400 Hello.... About brain simulation... Fragment of rat brain simulated in supercomputer Read more here: http://www.nature.com/news/fragment-of-rat-brain-simulated-in-supercomputer-1.18536 Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane, |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 01:08PM -0400 Hello.......... Why Hexascale computer and computing ? Hexascale computer and computing for simulating the brain, also to be able to reverse engineer the brain.. New supercomputer software takes one giant step closer to simulating the human brain Read here: https://phys.org/news/2015-10-supercomputer-software-giant-closer-simulating.html China says it will finish 'super supercomputer' prototype this year An exascale computer is capable of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 calculations per second Read more here: http://www.wired.co.uk/article/china-exascale-super-supercomputer Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 01:04PM -0400 Hello, Hexascale computer and computing for simulating the brain, also to be able to reverse engineer the brain.. New supercomputer software takes one giant step closer to simulating the human brain Read here: https://phys.org/news/2015-10-supercomputer-software-giant-closer-simulating.html China says it will finish 'super supercomputer' prototype this year An exascale computer is capable of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 calculations per second Read more here: http://www.wired.co.uk/article/china-exascale-super-supercomputer Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 12:32PM -0400 Hello........... I am thinking writing a compiler that includes a Virtual machine , it will support Threads with an efficient Threadpool that is NUMA-aware and NUMA efficient, and its memory manager will be scalable and with very little memory fragmentation and it will support calling Dynamic Link Libraries, and it will support my synchronization object Library and it will support much more.. And i was thinking more if i need or not a Just-In-Time Compiler, or can i simply support calling binary code of Dynamic Link Libraries ? But i have come accross the basic idea of a Just-In-Time Compiler, here it is: http://nullprogram.com/blog/2015/03/19/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 14 12:22PM -0400 Hello..... I am thinking writing a compiler that includes a Virtual machine , it will support Threads with an efficient Threadpool that is NUMA-aware and NUMA efficient, and its memory manager will be scalable and very little memory fragmentation and it will support calling Dynamic Link Libraries, and it will support much more.. And i was thinking more if i need or not a Just-In-Time Compiler, or can i simply support calling binary code of Dynamic Link Libraries ? But i have come accross the basic idea of a Just-In-Time Compiler, here it is: http://nullprogram.com/blog/2015/03/19/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment