- Why Go Optimization ? - 1 Update
- Here is some of my thoughts that i have extended - 1 Update
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 15 02:02PM -0400 Hello............. Efficient morality is optimization is performance and reliability, and reliability includes security. Why Go Optimization ? Shorter horizons. Planning horizons are now typically around three months, thanks to the reporting period required by the gnomes on Wall Street. Only efficient optimization is compatible with that kind of requirements. Tactical planning. It's already a jungle out there when it comes to developing or installing large-scale distributed applications. That, combined with shorter development times and launch horizons, requires efficient optimization. Capital efficiency. Efficient optimization is not just about the future anymore. Efficient optimization addresses the serious need to squeeze more out of your current capital equipment. Better tools. To solve performance problems in datacenters involving 1000s of servers spanning multiple tiers, we need tools that go beyond simple reporting and enable better data discovery. And here is some of my useful software tools that i have created: Universal Scalability Law program was updated to version 3.12 Author: Amine Moulay Ramdane Now it compiles correctly on LLVM-based Delphi compilers.. Where also do you use it ? You use it for example to optimize more the cost/performance ratio on multicores and manycores. With -nlr option means that the problem will be solved with the mathematical nonlinear regression using the simplex method as a minimization, if you don't specify -nlr, the problem will be solved by default by the mathematical polynomial regression, and since it uses regression , you can use it for example to test your system on many more cores with just a few points, and after that using regression it searchs for the cost/performance ratio that is optimal for you. Please read more about my Universal Scalability Law for Delphi and FreePascal, it comes with a graphical and a command-line program. I have included a 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables called usl.exe and usl_graph.exe inside the zip, please read the readme file to know how to use it, it is a very powerful tool. You can read about it and download the new version 3.12 from here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal And: You have to appreciate my inventions of my C++ synchronization objects library.. Here is why: Here is the problem of optimistic Transactional memory: If there is more conflicts between reads and writes you have to rollback and to serialize also etc. and this will be less energy efficient and it will be less faster than pessimistic locking mechanisms So i think that my C++ Synchronization objects library and my Delphi synchronization objects are still really useful.. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/c-synchronization-objects-library Thank you, And: Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library version 1.64 Author: Amine Moulay Ramdane Description: This library contains a Scalable Parallel implementation of Conjugate Gradient Dense Linear System Solver library that is NUMA-aware and cache-aware, and it contains also a Scalable Parallel implementation of Conjugate Gradient Sparse Linear System Solver library that is cache-aware. Please download the zip file and read the readme file inside the zip to know how to use it. Language: GNU C++ and Visual C++ and C++Builder Operating Systems: Windows, Linux, Unix and Mac OS X on (x86) You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-parallel-c-conjugate-gradient-linear-system-solver-library You can download my other projects from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| rami18 <coco@coco.com>: Jun 15 12:31PM -0400 Hello........... Here is some of my thoughts that i have extended, please read this post to understand better my thoughts.. What is the essence of organization ? Those are the questions that we ask in courses of philosophy. Now i have to be smartness and rationality and logic to answer this question. Smartness is an important requirement that fulfill this goal. And you have to learn how to think Sir and Madam.. So how can we attack this problem ? When you start thinking it is like also abstracting to the essentials to be able to simplify our thinking.. So this process of abstraction needs also my smartness to decompose efficiently... Smartness is also a fast process that finds fast the shortest path to the solution or that finds the solution to the problem.. So my smartness will answer like this: Look at our essence, we are a composition of consciousness and physical body.. But we can try to say that we are guided by the process of survival of fittest.. But this is not good abstraction.. We have to be smartness.. So why do we need to organize ? You will say that we have to be organized because of the process survival of the fittest.. But this is a narrow view.. Because it is a definition that is pejorative and not efficient.. Because of the following question: Why we need to survive better ? It is because of our weaknesses. But i say that it is still not a correct answer , because it is too much abstraction that lacks efficiency. Because our weaknesses need to be organized by optimization. This is the magical word, it is optimization. Why do we optimize ? to be more powerful and more reliability and correctness. You will ask a question such as: Is optimization: reliability and correctness ? My answer: When you are not reliable and/or correctness you are less efficient, so efficiency is also reliability and correctness. This is why i have abstracted the essence of organization to the process of optimization. But that's lacking Abstraction. Because we have to look at the composition of optimization. Optimization is performance and reliability. So that the essence of organization is the composition of optimization that is performance and reliability. So the essence of optimization is not only performance , but it is reliability. And that's also efficient morality, and efficient morality is Liberty and Liberty is efficient morality. So now my answer is not finished: Because the optimization is constrained.. Because corruption of morality is related to optimization.. So how can we measure corruption of morality ? What is corruption of morality ? This is an interesting subject.. It's like abstracting, you have to decompose and compose.. You can say for example what are the causes of corruption of morality? You can say what is the consequences of corruption ? You can define efficiently morality to be able to know about corruption. So if you define morality you will define it as a composition of: Guidance of moral, and a priori pure moral and empirical moral. And now you see that the difficulty is how to set the reference to be able to measure corruption of morality with it. What is the reference of morality ? The reference must be optimization that knows how to be optimization. I mean that optimization can not set itself as being performance alone. And optimization can not set itself to be extreme justice that lacks optimization, like ignoring the optimization by the "heuristic" of "tolerance" that optimizes the economic system and the social system. And optimization must be an effort to maintain stableness and raliability of the system, that means reliability of the system, this is related to security, and security is also related to compassion and love and respect, because neglecting compassion , love and respect do cause extremism and violence that hurt the system. How optimization must be this effort ? because discipline and progress are inherent to Liberty, so you have to enforce them efficiently and wisely by the hard way, that means by laws and by the soft way that i talked about.. So all in all the schema seems to be more clear and seems to indicate to us more what is corruption of morality, and it indicate to us what is the essence of organization.. I was thinking more, and here is my new thinking: Determinism easy for us to set the truth and sets the way of logic, and this truth and way of logic must be computed by our brain to create a consistent system that is efficient morality that is optimization that is performance and reliability. So there is some truth that hurts and some truth that is efficient morality that is optimization that we call tolerable or good, so the essence of truth is based on our essence that is our consciousness of space-time and the determinism of our empirical and physical world, and about the essence of logical consistency of the system, you can understand it by example like this: About the consistency of the system We call it consistency of the system.. When the system is: If A is smaller than B And B is smaller than C And if B is medium The system above doesn't allow to say that: A is smaller than B Because if you say that , it is as you are saying that A is smaller than B only, so that's a contradiction that hurts consistency of the system. And The system above doesn't allow to say that: B is smaller than C Because if you say that , it is as you are saying that B is smaller than C only, so that's a contradiction that hurts consistency of the system. So the system has to be consistent, so the system force you to say all at the same time: A is smaller than B B is smaller than C B is medium So that to be strict and clear to not create any contradiction. And about the essence of measure.. Philosophy is like mathematics.. Now what is the essence of measure ? I think that the reference is the consciousness of space-time as i have explained, adjoined with the senses of measure that we have, such as the sense of orientation and the sense of measuring space and saying that this is bigger than this etc. those ingrediants permit us to measure, i will ask for example, what is a point (in geometry) ? to understand a point we must map it to our consciousness of space-time as i have explained, so this is rooted on the physical empirical world, even if we are using our senses of measure, so this is why i have explained that mathematical logic and the mathematical Set theory for example are also rooted on the physical and empirical world , but the space-time can be relative or general, relativeness permit also to measure the truth , but this seems to create some contradictions in the system, this has been showed in my writing and explanation of my previous post of what is the essence of love and what is love, but i have showed that this can be resolved by using the reference of the general morality of the society as the reference that permits to measure and that must be enforced by laws and police. The essence of the Truth What is a Truth ? what is the essence of the Truth ? That's an important question.. Philosophy is like mathematics, because Philosophy must be based on efficient morality and efficient morality is optimization and optimization is performance and reliability. So if you look at mathematical logic.. What is mathematical logic ? Mathematical logic is also being conscious and feeling the space-time.. Here is why: Now I will give my explanation of what is consciousness... I hope that in my previous messages you have understood my explanation of how the consciousness of time is generated by our brain, I have said that the brain has a sense of direction that makes it possible to say that one object is left or on the right and back or front etc., and the brain is also able to see space in 3 dimensions with the sense of the gaze for example, that is to say to give coordinates as cartesian or polar in three dimensions to objects in the space of reality, and also the brain by means of the sense of touch and the eye is capable of the sense of the measurement of the magnitudes in the space of reality, these are ingredients of the brain which gives birth to the consciousness of time, for consciousness of time means that for two objects that follow each other, we are able to feel the existence in space of the back of the first object (by the sens of the orientation of the brain) Which is for example "nothing", and that one also feels the existence in the space of the back of the second object which is the first object, and that we are therefore able to associate the back of the second object to the word "before", and this is how the consciousness of time is engendered ... now i come to a question even more important, but what is consciousness really? i start with an example so that you can understand what it really is: when you touch your hands with water very hot, you are able to feel the pain and to say that it is you who feel the pain, so the meaning of touch is closely linked to the consciousness of the "I", but Let us return, if you like, to the experiences of a child, you will notice that a necessary condition for the child to be able to learn and understand is to be able to ask the question of "what is", but you see this question has as a necessary condition the consciousness of the self, for when the child arises, question of "what is" is that it would mean: "I would like to know what it is", and the "I would like to know" demonstrates the presence of a consciousness of the pre-ego which guide the questioning of the child, but then what is this awareness of the pre-ego that guides the questioning that makes a consciousness too? Here is my answer: I believe that as in the case of the sense of touch which is in close relationship with the consciousness of the ego, the act of reflection is also a sens as the sens of touch that is able to make us feel that we exist and feel the space in three dimensions, as for touching the very warm water that allows us to feel that the feeling of hot water hurts us ... what would I like to say? that the sens of touch and the sens of smell for example are adjoined to space-time to give a better consciousness of space-time, that is, the ideas we have of space-time are not , for example, just rules of logic, but also are recorded with sensations of touch and other sensations to give a better consciousness, so the act of reflection is not just able to logically reason with simple rules of logic for building more complex logic rules etc. But it is also capable of associating space-time sensations with objects that are displaced in a 3-dimensional world, and therefore my theory makes us see the act of thought as also being also another sens that resembles the sens of touch , this is my explanation of how the consciousness and consciousness of the ego is engendered by the brain. When you say in mathematical logic: A or B How do you think you understand this logical rule? You must go back to your childhood when you were to learn it, you were told for example there are two balls, and you had to take just one and give it back, and the teacher made us understand for example the following: when you want to take two balls you are informed with gestures that it is NO, And when you just take one and turn the ball back, you get to know that it is YES, therefore I affirm that it is thanks to the existence of space-time which is also a consequence of our interior sensation of the space-time which gives the consciousness of space-time, I mean you are able for example with your brain to feel and understand what BEFORE or BEHIND Or LEFT or RIGHT, and you are able to feel the space and to say that it exists and what it is, so you are able to feel the space-time, and this sensation in our brain that we have of space-time helps us to understand the logical rule of: A or B, or the logical rule of: A and B. So let us return to the following theorem in mathematical logic: If A then B, and if B then C, then A then C. So how do you understand the: If A then B? As in my explanation above, you can not understand this rule without being conscious and without feeling space-time, because even if you are a blind person, you can feel your individuality and your singularity which is the consciousness of the ego, and this self-consciousness is a consequence of the sensation in our brain of space-time that allows us to feel that the object which is "WE" is different from other objects etc. Then what makes even the blind man feels the space-time and is capable to say that this object is before that object in time, So it is able to understand the logical rule of: If A then B, and since he is capable of doing so, he is capable, thanks to the sensation of the space-time that we have in our brain, that permit us to understand The following theorem: If A then B, and if B then C, then A then C. This is my evidence based on the empirical facts and this proves that mathematical logic is also a consequence of the sensation that we have in our brain of space-time, without this sensation we can not, in my opinion, understand mathematical logic, and since the machine is incapable of feeling like a human being space-time, then we can not say that artificial intelligence Is capable of achieving the emergence of consciousness. Now what is the truth ? In mathematical logic the truth is rooted on our consciousness and feeling of space-time as i have explained, so the reference is space-time, so we are capable of deducting the truth by mapping mathematical logic to our consciousness and our feeling of the space-time, this is i think the reference that permit to measure the Truth and define the Truth. And in the mathematical Set theory that's the same as logic. Also the reference is important, the reference can be general or it can be relative, as i have explained by: Getting more rational... Today i will ask a question of: what is love ? And the answer must be more rational. So we have to use smartness.. Like the theorems of Kurt Gödel, there is something that seems happening.. If you say that there is still some suffering in your life.. You can come to a deductive conclusion that it is not love. But if you choose a reference as being one person that is suffering more than you, you will conclude that your "some" suffering is considered to be part of good, and this good is part of love. So as you have noticed there seems like there is a contradiction in the system.. But this is just our senses, my rationality says that if the reference is individual morality, so the person above will say that some suffering is not love. But if the reference is general morality of the society, you will say that this some suffering is considered to be part of good, so it is part of love. So this relativeness to the general reference that is general of morality of the society is a good measure i think. It is like when we are asking the questions of: What is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ? I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality. How it can measure it? Optimization is performance and reliability, and Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or universes that is performant, it is |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment