Saturday, June 10, 2017

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 14 updates in 14 topics

rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 28 07:01PM -0400

Hello............
 
 
Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver
Library version 1.64
 
 
Author: Amine Moulay Ramdane
 
Description:
 
This library contains a Scalable Parallel implementation of
Conjugate Gradient Dense Linear System Solver library that is
NUMA-aware and cache-aware, and it contains also a Scalable
Parallel implementation of Conjugate Gradient Sparse Linear
System Solver library that is cache-aware.
 
Please download the zip file and read the readme file inside the
zip to know how to use it.
 
Language: GNU C++ and Visual C++ and C++Builder
 
Operating Systems: Windows, Linux, Unix and Mac OS X on (x86)
 
 
You can download it from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-parallel-c-conjugate-gradient-linear-system-solver-library
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 28 11:06PM -0400

Hello..............
 
 
Read again, i correct a typo
 
Getting more technical in politics...
 
Getting more technical that's also mean getting more efficient with
rationality and logic, because i am a rational type of person..
 
You have to understand the game of politics..
 
The game of politics is not saying that jews are getting rich so jews
are bad, this is the neo-nazism way of thinking..
 
But this thinking is inferior..
 
Because when you think about morality, you have
to decompose morality into the guidance of morality and
the a priori pure moral and empirical moral..
 
I have defined the guidance of morality as being the goal of philosophy
that is happiness that guides also morality, this guidance
is inherent to our essence.
 
And a priori pure moral is inferred from reason
 
and empirical moral is inferred from empirical world.
 
So morality is not too much ideal justice as in communism using
the tool of the violence of Class Struggle because of compassion that
wants to reduce too much social Darwinism, this causes extremism and
violence, or morality is not too extreme definition of what is white
europeans civilization, as in neo-nazism, and that lacks the
optimization with the heuristic of "tolerance" towards immigration that
optimizes the economic system and the social system , this is an
inferior thinking.
 
You can make more money with more money, but allowing making more money
is also a mechanism like an heuristic that provoke and bring more
quality, this is also inferred from empirical moral, it's like the
heuristic of "tolerance" that optimizes the system, we allow also to
make more money to not being laziness and to be more productif and to be
more efficient and to be more creativity and to be more inventivity.. so
this heuristic is the base of capitalism also, this is why we can not
say that capitalism is bad, but capitalism and the system is also
constrained by other mechanisms like the mechanism of not neglecting
compassion and respect and love to not cause violence and extremism in
the system,
now the interpretation of how much compassion and respect and love
will not be leaved to the reader, because the degree of compassion and
love and respect needed in the system must be interpreted as avoiding
extremism that can causes hate and violence and desorder, so the degree
of compassion and love and respect must be approximated by a political
party such as social democracy or social Liberalism that knows how
to be decent compassion and decent respect and decent love, the other
important mechanism is "democracy" and the power of the people
, this power of the people can provoke and bring quality but
it's also constrained by the mechanism and the counter-power of the
financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that
take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions,
and this creates also a world stability because we have to optimize our
economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable
governance and responsable democracy, the other mechanism is
also the consumer confidence index that is a power that provoke
and bring quality to the system, because we have to know how to be
respect and compassion and love to higher consumer confidence
index locally and internationally, the other mechanism about morality
is the soft way and the hard way to provoke and bring quality to
morality, You have to know how to provoke and bring quality to morality
of the system, there is the soft way and the hard way.. all is not laws,
you have to know how to provoke and bring quality using the soft way,
like i was doing in my previous post called:
 
"What is the most important goal of my political philosophy?"
 
and you have to know how to design and implement laws by being more
efficient at inferring them from the guidance of moral and a priori
pure moral and empirical moral more, this is the essence of efficiency,
you have to be capable and smarter in doing it, that's a necessary
requirement to survive better and that fact is the soft way
that provoke and bring more quality and the hard way is to know
how to enforce the necessary laws, so be smart, because
it's the essence of rationality and logic.
 
Also there is the mechanism and heuristic of "tolerance" over
immigration that provoke and bring more quality, as i have
said that Nationalism of Donald Trump lack the heuristic of flexibility
using tolerance that get you more optimized, but social Liberalism of
democrates uses the flexibility of tolerance to optimize the economic
system and the social system, nationalism is like extreme justice of
communism that lack tolerance and that can hurt economic system and the
social system.
 
Because I have said about morality that:
 
Justice has to constrain happiness..
 
And responsability has to constrain justice..
 
But responsability is influenced by the variable of tolerance ,
so if we are more tolerance on responsability we can higher the consumer
confidence in you and we can attract more consumers and we can penetrate
more the market of others, this is the game of social Liberalism.
 
Social Liberalism of democrates wants also to play the card of tolerance
to attract consumers and to higher consumer confidence index and to be
able to penetrate more the market of others and to optimize better the
social system, nationalism doesn't undertand it well.
 
And i have explained also to you about the heuristic of "tolerance" that:
 
Capitalism also wants to optimize, and capitalism says for example
that even arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, it says that
arabs are tolerable, because capitalism wants to optimize economy
and the society by bringing arabs immigrants that are also decent
people, because today we are constrained by many factors, and
optimization has been rendered by those constrains to as the following:
 
If you are useful for something like jobs and economy or/and useful to
low birth rate of white europeans or/and you are useful to higher the
consumer confidence index and/or and you are useful to better the world
order and security , you can be welcome to USA or other countries..
 
About America and the world..
 
Before, operating systems like OS/2 of IBM were a monolithic OSs ,
but as the time has gone by we have developed more sophisticated
OSs like Mach 3 or Windows NT, those sophisticated OSs were more
decentralized and were designed in a such a way to be more efficient
and managed better, the difference between a monolithic one and not
monolithic one is like programming with message passing or Object
oriented programming, and we have also the tendency to decentralize the
management of our societies to be more efficient, it's the same
for capitalism , capitalism tries to optimize better by not
being as monolithic as the old way of thinking of Hitler, so
today because of constrains on optimization, usefulness is interpreted
not as being as beautiful as white europeans or being as civilized as
white europeans to better optimize the system economically.. it's
like decentralizing to better optimize, now to not get extremist,
you have to know how to tune correctly optimization to better optimize
and to not cause problems to societies.
 
Also you have to know how to apply the division of labour and how to
apply Adam Smith's specialization Theory to be more optimized..
 
And the other mechanism that bring quality to the system is the following:
 
About the crispations of extremist nationalism..
 
The old way of thinking like nazism and communism was full of violence..
 
So we have to enhance ourselves to avoid those problems..
 
The world has changed, and we are not at the time of Hitler in 1930,
the crispations of extremist nationalism was also due to a need
of being more domination in the secondary sector of economy, but
this model is becoming more archaic, please read why:
 
"The economic models developed by the development economists of the
1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be
losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic
development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the
development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. "
by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy
Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank.
 
Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english,
because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco
my country:
 
http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 28 10:42PM -0400

Hello...............
 
 
Getting more technical in politics...
 
Getting more technical that's also mean getting more efficient with
rationality and logic, because i am a rational type of person..
 
You have to understand the game of politics..
 
The game of politics is not saying that jews are getting rich so jews
are bad, this is the neo-nazism way of thinking..
 
But this thinking is inferior..
 
Because when you think about morality, you have
to decompose morality into the guidance of morality and
the a priori pure moral and empirical moral..
 
I have defined the guidance of morality as being the goal of philosophy
that is happiness that guides also morality, this guidance
is inherent to our essence.
 
And a priori pure moral is inferred from reason
 
and empirical moral is inferred from empirical world.
 
So morality is not too much ideal justice as in communism using
the tool of the violence of Class Struggle because of compassion that
wants to reduce too much social Darwinism, this causes extremism and
violence, or morality is not too extreme definition of what is white
europeans civilization, as in neo-nazism, and that lacks the
optimization with the heuristic of "tolerance" towards immigration that
optimizes the economic system and the social system , this is an
inferior thinking.
 
You can make more money with more money, but allowing making more money
is also a mechanism like an heuristic that provoke and bring more
quality, this is also inferred from empirical moral, it's like the
heuristic of "tolerance" that optimizes the system, we allow also to
make more money to not being laziness and to be more productif and to be
more efficient and to be more creativity and to be more inventivity.. so
this heuristic is the base of capitalism also, this is why we can not
say that capitalism is bad, but capitalism and the system is also
constrained by other mechanisms like the mechanism of not neglecting
compassion and respect and love to not cause violence and extremism in
the system,
now the interpretation of how much compassion and respect and love
will not be leaved to the reader, because the degree of compassion and
love and respect needed in the system must be interpreted as avoiding
extremism that can causes hate and violence and desorder, so the degree
of compassion and love and respect must be approximated by a political
party such as social democracy or social Liberalism that lnows how
to be decent compassion and decent respect and decent love, the other
important mechanism is "democracy" and the power of the people
, this power of the people can provoke and bring quality but
it's also constrained by the mechanism and the counter-power of the
financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that
take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions,
and this creates also a world stability because we have to optimize our
economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable
governance and responsable democracy, the other mechanism is
also the consumer confidence index that is a power that provoke
and bring quality to the system, because we have to know how to be
respect and compassion and love to higher consumer confidence
index locally and internationally, the other mechanism about morality
is the soft way and the hard way to provoke and bring quality to
morality, You have to know how to provoke and bring quality to morality
of the system, there is the soft way and the hard way.. all is not laws,
you have to know how to provoke and bring quality using the soft way,
like i was doing in my previous post called:
 
"What is the most important goal of my political philosophy?"
 
and you have to know how to design and implement laws by being more
efficient at inferring them from the guidance of moral and a priori
pure moral and empirical moral more, this is the essence of efficiency,
you have to be capable and smarter in doing it, that's a necessary
requirement to survive better and that fact is the soft way
that provoke and bring more quality and the hard way is to know
how to enforce the necessary laws, so be smart, because
it's the essence of rationality and logic.
 
Also there is the mechanism and heuristic of "tolerance" over
immigration that provoke and bring more quality, as i have
said that Nationalism of Donald Trump lack the heuristic of flexibility
using tolerance that get you more optimized, but social Liberalism of
democrates uses the flexibility of tolerance to optimize the economic
system and the social system, nationalism is like extreme justice of
communism that lack tolerance and that can hurt economic system and the
social system.
 
Because I have said about morality that:
 
Justice has to constrain happiness..
 
And responsability has to constrain justice..
 
But responsability is influenced by the variable of tolerance ,
so if we are more tolerance on responsability we can higher the consumer
confidence in you and we can attract more consumers and we can penetrate
more the market of others, this is the game of social Liberalism.
 
Social Liberalism of democrates wants also to play the card of tolerance
to attract consumers and to higher consumer confidence index and to be
able to penetrate more the market of others and to optimize better the
social system, nationalism doesn't undertand it well.
 
And i have explained also to you about the heuristic of "tolerance" that:
 
Capitalism also wants to optimize, and capitalism says for example
that even arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, it says that
arabs are tolerable, because capitalism wants to optimize economy
and the society by bringing arabs immigrants that are also decent
people, because today we are constrained by many factors, and
optimization has been rendered by those constrains to as the following:
 
If you are useful for something like jobs and economy or/and useful to
low birth rate of white europeans or/and you are useful to higher the
consumer confidence index and/or and you are useful to better the world
order and security , you can be welcome to USA or other countries..
 
About America and the world..
 
Before, operating systems like OS/2 of IBM were a monolithic OSs ,
but as the time has gone by we have developed more sophisticated
OSs like Mach 3 or Windows NT, those sophisticated OSs were more
decentralized and were designed in a such a way to be more efficient
and managed better, the difference between a monolithic one and not
monolithic one is like programming with message passing or Object
oriented programming, and we have also the tendency to decentralize the
management of our societies to be more efficient, it's the same
for capitalism , capitalism tries to optimize better by not
being as monolithic as the old way of thinking of Hitler, so
today because of constrains on optimization, usefulness is interpreted
not as being as beautiful as white europeans or being as civilized as
white europeans to better optimize the system economically.. it's
like decentralizing to better optimize, now to not get extremist,
you have to know how to tune correctly optimization to better optimize
and to not cause problems to societies.
 
Also you have to know how to apply the division of labour and how to
apply Adam Smith's specialization Theory to be more optimized..
 
And the other mechanism that bring quality to the system is the following:
 
About the crispations of extremist nationalism..
 
The old way of thinking like nazism and communism was full of violence..
 
So we have to enhance ourselves to avoid those problems..
 
The world has changed, and we are not at the time of Hitler in 1930,
the crispations of extremist nationalism was also due to a need
of being more domination in the secondary sector of economy, but
this model is becoming more archaic, please read why:
 
"The economic models developed by the development economists of the
1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be
losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic
development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the
development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. "
by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy
Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank.
 
Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english,
because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco
my country:
 
http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 28 06:31PM -0400

Hello....
 
 
I am a computer programmer..
 
How to improve also quality and timeliness of software ?
 
I was asking myself this question and i will present my thoughts:
 
You have to abstract also the graph that offer a deeper insights into
the nature of objects and the system.
 
And this has to be done smartly..
 
The abstract graph of the system must reveal the following:
 
1- It has to reveal the hierarchy of roles and the
breadths of those roles
 
2- It has to offer a deeper insights into the nature of the objects, the
abstract graph must reveal easily the triads why-what-how.
 
3- the abstract graph must be clear and it has to clearly and
efficiently and plainly communicates what the roles do.
 
4- It has to have a high unity, a role has high unity if all actions
described in the role have one purpose.
 
5- You have to have a good coupling between objects and methods. This is
the visibility and degree to which two objects or methods communicate
with each other. This is the degree of interdependence between software
modules, a measure of how closely connected two routines or modules are,
it must be low coupling. A low coupling is a sign of well-structured
software system
 
Also i am an experienced programmer in parallel programming and
synchronization algorithms, and here is some of my inventions:
 
You have to appreciate my inventions of my C++ synchronization objects
library..
 
Here is why:
 
Here is the problem of optimistic Transactional memory:
 
If there is more conflicts between reads and writes you have to rollback
and to serialize also etc. and this will be less energy efficient and it
will be less faster than pessimistic locking mechanisms
 
So i think that my C++ Synchronization objects library and my Delphi
synchronization objects are still really useful..
 
You can download it from:
 
https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/c-synchronization-objects-library
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 27 07:24PM -0400

Hello.................
 
 
I correct, please read more..
 
Our beloved America...
 
You have to understand our beloved America..
 
America is not ignoring rationality that optimizes, this why
it is a wisdom of America, wisdom does take a little bit
of time to mature to actions, you have to be patience of science
and you have to be maturity, and you have to be confident with America,
because look at the mechanisms that provoke and bring a better quality
to America, the mechanism and the power (because it is a power) of
consumer confidence index is making governance more good looking and
more presentable , this mechanism can not be ignored, because
to higher consumer confidence index you have to know how to be
presentable and good looking and how to be respect, this is why Donald
Trump is also playing this card, he knows also how to be good looking
and presentable to others and how to be respect, this is a key point
also, other than that the other mechanism also that nationalism that is
not extremist can not ignore is that tolerance plays also the role of an
heuristic that optimizes the economic system and optimize the social
system, so you have to know how to be this tolerance on immigration to
fulfil the goal of optimizing your economic system and social
system, i have explained it to you before on my text of my political
philosophy, so then immigration is not seen like being bad for white
europeans types, because it optimizes the system, and you have to know
how to tune tolerance to be more efficient and to not cause problems to
societies, so this mechanism of tolerance as an heuristic
that optimizes is also really important, and this mechanism is not
not ignored by nationalism too that is not extremist,
so this is all beautiful, also America knows also that
China can not ignore the above mechanisms, also America
knows how to optimize with the division of labour and how to apply Adam
Smith's specialization Theory to be optimized, and America knows
that China too can not ignore optimization of the system with this
mechanisms of division of labour and Adam Smith's specialization Theory,
also there is the mechanism of power and counter-power of democracy
versus financial and banks institutions that have there rating
methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the
economic conditions that being more responsability and more quality to
the system, China has not to ignore this fact, also there is the
mechanism and the power of not neglecting compassion and love and
respect to not cause extremism and violence inside and outside
the system, this is also the basic mechanism that bring the social sides
like social Democracy or social Liberalism, even nationalism of
Donald trump can not ignore this fact, because it is the back-bones
of Democracy, you have to know how to be compassion and love
and respect by providing social services such as education that is
affordable and medial services that are free for people etc.
to not cause extremism and violence inside the system.
There is also the following mechanism that bring more quality
 
There is also the following mechanism that bring more quality to the
system, please read it carefully:
 
About the crispations of extremist nationalism..
 
The old way of thinking like nazism and communism was full of violence..
 
So we have to enhance ourselves to avoid those problems..
 
The world has changed, and we are not at the time of Hitler in 1930,
the crispations of extremist nationalism was also due to a need
of being more domination in the secondary sector of economy, but
this model is becoming more archaic, please read why:
 
"The economic models developed by the development economists of the
1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be
losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic
development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the
development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. "
by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy
Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank.
 
Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english,
because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco
my country:
 
http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha
 
 
So extremist nationalism is loosing more and more of its supporters..
 
So all in all our beloved America is becoming more smart by
not ignoring my political philosophy
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 27 07:15PM -0400

Hello............
 
 
I extend, please read more..
 
Our beloved America...
 
You have to understand our beloved America..
 
America is not ignoring rationality that optimizes, this why
it is a wisdom of America, wisdom does take a little bit
of time to mature to actions, you have to be patience of science
and you have to be maturity, and you have to be confident with America,
because look at the mechanisms that provoke and bring a better quality
to America, the mechanism and the power (because it is a power) of
consumer confidence index is making governance more good looking and
more presentable , this mechanism can not be ignored, because
to higher consumer confidence index you have to know how to be
presentable and good looking and how to be respect, this is why Donald
Trump is also playing this card, he knows also how to be good looking
and presentable to others and how to be respect, this is a key point
also, other than that the other mechanism also that nationalism that is
not extremist can not ignore is that tolerance plays also the role of an
heuristic that optimizes the economic system and optimize the social
system, so you have to know how to be this tolerance on immigration to
fulfil the goal of optimizing your economic system and social
system, i have explained it to you before on my text of my political
philosophy, so then immigration is not seen like being bad for white
europeans types, because it optimizes the system, and you have to know
how to tune tolerance to be more efficient and to not cause problems to
societies, so this mechanism of tolerance as an heuristic
that optimized is also really important, and this mechanism is not
not ignored by nationalism too that is not extremist,
so this is all beautiful, also America knows also that
China can not ignoer the above mechanisms, also America
knows how to optimize with the division of labour and how to apply Adam
Smith's specialization Theory to be optimized, and America knows
that China too can not ignore optimization of the system with this
mechanisms of division of labour and Adam Smith's specialization Theory,
also there is the mechanism of power and counter-power of democracy
versus financial and banks institutions that have there rating
methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the
economic conditions that being more responsability and more quality to
the system, China has not to ignore this fact, also there is the
mechanism and the power of not neglecting compassion and love and
respect to not cause extremism and violence inside and outside
the system, this is also the basic mechanism that bring the social sides
like social Democracy or social Liberalism, even nationalism of
Donald trump can not ignore this fact, because it is the back-bones
of Democracy, you have to know how to be compassion and love
and respect by providing social services such as education that is
affordable and medial services that are free for people etc.
to not cause extremism and violence inside the system.
There is also the following mechanism that bring more quality
 
There is also the following mechanism that bring more quality to the
system, please read it carefully:
 
About the crispations of extremist nationalism..
 
The old way of thinking like nazism and communism was full of violence..
 
So we have to enhance ourselves to avoid those problems..
 
The world has changed, and we are not at the time of Hitler in 1930,
the crispations of extremist nationalism was also due to a need
of being more domination in the secondary sector of economy, but
this model is becoming more archaic, please read why:
 
"The economic models developed by the development economists of the
1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be
losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic
development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the
development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. "
by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy
Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank.
 
Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english,
because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco
my country:
 
http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha
 
 
So extremist nationalism is loosing more and more of its supporters..
 
So all in all our beloved America is becoming more smart by
not ignoring my political philosophy
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 27 07:33PM -0400

Hello.................
 
 
Read my final post, i correct some typos because i think fast and write
fast...
 
 
Our beloved America...
 
You have to understand our beloved America..
 
America is not ignoring rationality that optimizes, this why
it is a wisdom of America, wisdom does take a little bit
of time to mature to actions, you have to be patience of science
and you have to be maturity, and you have to be confident with America,
because look at the mechanisms that provoke and bring a better quality
to America, the mechanism and the power (because it is a power) of
consumer confidence index is making governance more good looking and
more presentable , this mechanism can not be ignored, because
to higher consumer confidence index you have to know how to be
presentable and good looking and how to be respect, this is why Donald
Trump is also playing this card, he knows also how to be good looking
and presentable to others and how to be respect, this is a key point
also, other than that the other mechanism also that nationalism that is
not extremist can not ignore is that tolerance plays also the role of an
heuristic that optimizes the economic system and optimize the social
system, so you have to know how to be this tolerance on immigration to
fulfil the goal of optimizing your economic system and social
system, i have explained it to you before on my text of my political
philosophy, so then immigration is not seen like being bad for white
europeans types, because it optimizes the system, and you have to know
how to tune tolerance to be more efficient and to not cause problems to
societies, so this mechanism of tolerance as an heuristic
that optimizes is also really important, and this mechanism is not
not ignored by nationalism too that is not extremist,
so this is all beautiful, also America knows also that
China can not ignore the above mechanisms, also America
knows how to optimize with the division of labour and how to apply Adam
Smith's specialization Theory to be optimized, and America knows
that China too can not ignore optimization of the system with this
mechanisms of division of labour and Adam Smith's specialization Theory,
also there is the mechanism of power and counter-power of democracy
versus financial and banks institutions that have there rating
methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the
economic conditions that brings more responsability and more quality to
the system, China has not to ignore this fact, also there is the
mechanism and the power of not neglecting compassion and love and
respect to not cause extremism and violence inside and outside
the system, this is also the basic mechanism that bring the social sides
like social Democracy or social Liberalism, even nationalism of
Donald trump can not ignore this fact, because it is the back-bones
of Democracy, you have to know how to be compassion and love
and respect by providing social services such as education that is
affordable and medial services that are free for people etc.
to not cause extremism and violence inside the system.
There is also the following mechanism that bring more quality
 
There is also the following mechanism that bring more quality to the
system, please read it carefully:
 
About the crispations of extremist nationalism..
 
The old way of thinking like nazism and communism was full of violence..
 
So we have to enhance ourselves to avoid those problems..
 
The world has changed, and we are not at the time of Hitler in 1930,
the crispations of extremist nationalism was also due to a need
of being more domination in the secondary sector of economy, but
this model is becoming more archaic, please read why:
 
"The economic models developed by the development economists of the
1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be
losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic
development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the
development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. "
by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy
Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank.
 
Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english,
because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco
my country:
 
http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha
 
 
So extremist nationalism is loosing more and more of its supporters..
 
So all in all our beloved America is becoming more smart by
not ignoring my political philosophy
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 27 07:05PM -0400

Hello.................
 
 
Our beloved America...
 
You have to understand our beloved America..
 
America is not ignoring rationality that optimizes, this why
it is a wisdom of America, wisdom does take a little bit
of time to mature to actions, you have to be patience of science
and you have to be maturity, and you have to be confident with America,
because look at the mechanisms that provoke and bring a better quality
to America, the mechanism and the power (because it is a power) of
consumer confidence index is making governance more good looking and
more presentable , this mechanism can not be ignored, because
to higher consumer confidence index you have to know how to be
presentable and good looking and how to be respect, this is why Donald
Trump is also playing this card, he knows also how to be good looking
and presentable to others and how to be respect, this is a key point
also, other than that the other mechanism also that natinalism that is
not extremist can not ignore is that tolerance plays also the role of an
heuristic that optimizes the economic system and optimize the social
system, so you have to know how to be this tolerance on immigration to
fulfil the goal of optimizing your economic system and social
system, i have explained it to you before on my text of my political
philosophy, so then immigration is not seen like being bad for white
europeans types, because it optimizes the system, and you have to know
how to tune tolerance to be more efficient and to not cause problems to
societies, so this mechanism of tolerance as an heuristic
that optimized is also really important, and this mechanism is not
not ignored by nationalism too that is not extremist,
so this is all beautiful, also America knows also that
China can not ignoer the above mechanisms, also America
knows how to optimize with the division of labour and how to apply Adam
Smith's specialization Theory to be optimized, and America knows
that China too can not ignore optimization of the system with this
mechanisms of division of labour and Adam Smith's specialization Theory,
also there is the mechanism of power and counter-power of democracy
versus financial and banks institutions that have there rating
methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the
economic conditions that being more responsability and more quality to
the system, China has not to ignore this fact, also there is the
mechanism and the power of not neglecting compassion and love and
respect to not cause extremism and violence inside and outside
the system, this is also the basic mechanism that bring the social sides
like social Democracy or social Liberalism, even nationalism of
Donald trump can not ignore this fact, because it is the back-bones
of Democracy, you have to know how to be compassion and love
and respect by providing social services such as education that is
affordable and medial services that are free for people etc.
to not cause extremism and violence inside the system.
 
 
So all in all our beloved America is becoming more smart by
not ignoring my political philosophy.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 27 05:36PM -0400

Hello..............
 
Please read my following efficient thoughts, it's part of my political
philosophy:
 
I have explained with 2 + 2 = 4 that the "consciousness"
is the "consequence" of "understanding", then once
that you build a hierarchy of ideas and
Logical relations and by also measure, then you will be able to
understand mathematical equality Of 2 + 2 = 4, and once you understand
that, at this very precise moment that you understand mathematical
equality 2 + 2 = 4, then you will be ultimately conscious
Of the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4, that is why I have said that
the process of consciousness is much simpler than the process of
intelligence in action, so I hope that my argumentation is clear. Now
there remains something to be explained is that even if the process of
intelligence in action has not been easy for humanity, the fact that a
human being understands the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4, then
this understanding will greatly reduce complexity and let us see the
"truth" as it really is, a child who tries initially to understand the
the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 will see this process as being
"difficult", but is that really "truth"? I do not believe because the
understanding of the essence of what is "truth" tells us that truth can
only be reached when there is complete comprehension of a process or a
thing, then the perception of the child who sees in the beginning of the
process of understanding the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 as being
"difficult" is not the truth, it is rather the perception of the one who
understood "completely" the mathematical equality of 2 + 2 = 4 and which
tells us that equality is easy which is the truth.
 
I have spoken of the understanding of the very essence of what is
the truth, for example, when you look at the door of a car, can you say
that it's a car ? I do not think, it's who looks and understands
everything that is Car that can say it's a car! do you understand ?
Then, in my opinion, it can be inferred that it is understanding of a
process or thing that greatly reduce or erase "complexity" and which
reveals to us the truth, It is like this for the mathematical equality
of 2 + 2 = 4 If a child in the beginning tries to understand this
equality, he will say that the mathematical equality is "difficult", but
is that the truth? I think no, because it's like the example of the car
which I have just given you, it is once the understanding
of equality is complete that it will greatly reduce or erase the
"complexity" and will confirm that the equality is truly "easy", and
This is the truth and that is the veridic perception and this is the
very essence of truth.
 
So if you have understood what I'm trying to explain,
Is that we could say that mathematics is easy and simple, our universe
is easy and simple and any thing or process is easy and simple,
But it is because we are limited intellectually or physically that we do
not understand it, i see this as in an axis of reality, i mean that the
complexity of mathematics and knowledge of mathematics is 0.1
on a scale of 100, and we are still weaker at 0.001 on a scale of 100 ,
even though knowledge of the universe and mathematics is easy, we feel
this as difficult.
 
But my point of view is not complete, I will present my other reasoning:
 
We can say, for example, that to define what a car is, we have
to "understand" what a car is, then we
can therefore affirm that the completeness of knowledge
of the car brings us to understand in a perfect way
what is a car .. now the important question in logic is: is it possible
to state the same thing about the variable of the "complexity" of
comprehension, that is to say: perfect knowledge leads us to understand
the very nature of the complexity of knowledge, as in the case of the
car i have just given you above, because it is the one who really knows
the car who can define the car, can we say the same thing about the
complexity of understanding? does it is the one who really knows
knowledge that can say what is the complexity of the understanding of
this knowledge? Do you understand my problem that
use logic effectively to solve this problem?
As in the problem of the car, above, what can we
say about the heaviness or the size of the car which characterizes
the car, we can say that it is the one who has knowledge about the car
and who understands the car that can accurately state what the heaviness
or the size of the car, but can we say the same thing about the
characteristic which is called the "Complexity" of understanding? I mean
that by analogy, if complexity is the characteristic of the
size of the car and if comprehension is the understanding of the car,
can we say the same thing and say that the completeness of understanding
can be defined only when there is more complete understanding and that
greatly reduce or erase complexity because when you understand more
fully this leads us to say that understanding is easy? I think that to
solve this problem it is necessary to look that in the case of the car,
the size and the heaviness are not of the variables of the
"comprehension" function, whereas in the case of complexity,
comprehension is, on the other hand, a variable of the complexity of
comprehension, so these are two different problems, so that the nature
of the complexity of Comprehension is relative to comprehension, since
comprehension is a variable of the complexity of comprehension, so the
problem is better solved in this way and complexity should be seen as a
function of comprehension, and more there is comprehension and more
there is understand and more there is less complexity of understanding.
 
And now here is my definitive proof and solution to this problem:
 
As you noted in my second reasoning, I have concluded that understanding
is a variable of complexity of understanding, for the more there is
comprehension the more there is less complexity of understanding. The
problem is not resolved as we can assert that understanding is the
theoretical representation of the car example that i have given above,
but since the more we understand theoretically the car, the more there
is less complexity of understanding, so we can say that the theoretical
representation of the understanding of the car system is easy, but this
is not true because, first of all, there is a contradiction, since two
theoretical systems, one which is more complex and another that is less
complex system, can both become as easy when there is definitive
understanding, and since the mechanism of awareness of the theoretical
understanding of the understanding of the car system rely on the speed
of our brain, that means that when you remember an understanding in your
brain, the brain is quick in its computation to do it, and This rapidity
of computation of the brain makes us see comprehension as easy, for
example, when you look at an equality of 2 + 2 = 4, your brain has
already understood this equality before when you were still a child, but
when you look at this equality now, the brain brings back the
understanding of this equality and it does so quickly , and this is what
does our brain, you do not have to understand the equality yet again,
no, the brain makes a quick computation and brings you back the
understanding of this equality quickly, that's what makes it easy to
understand the theoretical representation of the understanding of the
car system, since the theoretical representation of the understanding
of the system of a car is brought back quickly by the brain in the form
of an understanding of the parts of the theoretical system of the car,
as in the case of 2 + 2 = 4, and this shows us the theoretical
representation of understanding of the system of the car as being easy,
it is the brain that is fast and which facilitates because of its speed
of computation as in the case of 2 + 2 = 4.. so the ease of
understanding is a consequence of the speed of computation of the brain,
so it is not the theoretical representation of the understanding of the
car system that is easy. Thus I believe that the problem is definitely
solved by my logical and effective reasoning.
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 27 04:59PM -0400

Hello.......................
 
 
What is the most important goal of my political philosophy?
 
In my opinion the most important aim of my political philosophy is that
as I have just explained that the idea in the Platonic sense has a very
important characteristic, it is that one can perfect it and bring it to
be more and more perfect or even perfect, then in my opinion the aim of
my political philosophy it is to perfect ideas and to make them follow
by the people, not only that, but these architectural and efficient and
correct ideas of my political philosophy should be regarded as automata
that should be executed to arrive at there efficient goals, now a
question arises from it: how to encourage the people to execute these
architectural ideas as executing automata to perfect more our world ?
One of the ways to do this is what I have done in my political
philosophy is to show that rationality and science and microprocessors
and valuable advices etc. etc. are also as time machines that permit to
travel in the future , that is the architectural ideas of ​​my political
philosophy and this architectural ideas of ​​my political philosophy
leads the people to perceive the world differently by giving for example
more importance and high priority to science and efficient technics and
technology, the other method is also to reinforce more these
architectural ideas of my politicial philosophy to be able to enhance
and perfect, as we are enforcing laws..
 
Please reread i have corrected more my typos to understand more my
political philosophy:
 
Can we travel back in time?
 
Here is my thoughts that i have just wrote:
 
It is a very interesting question that demands rationality
and logical thinking to answer it ...
 
To answer it, i start from a mathematical subject which is the
mathematical arithmetic series.
 
An arithmetic series has as its main characteristic that
the difference between its terms is constant ... and that its sum
gives (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), a_n being the last term ... now you have
to be smart and notice with me that just before the final step of the
final calculation that resulted as a general equation of the arithmetic
series, the calculation of the arithmetic series required of us a much
bigger time to solve the series .. But as soon as the result (a_n * (a_n
+ 1)) / 2 has been reached, the time for the resolution of the
arithmetic series has greatly diminished, therefore the time preceding
the resolution has compressed a lot and allowed us to travel in the the
future quickly, the resolution of the arithmetic series which gave: (a_n
* (a_n + 1)) / 2), it's like a wormhole in the universe permit us to
time travel in the future more quickly, but understand with me that the
time travel in the future that allows you to make the equation of (a_n *
(a_n + 1)) / 2) is relative to the time taken previously by the
arithmetic series just before the discovery of the equation (a_n * (a_n
+ 1)) / 2), and thus that the universe is computable and that ultimately
it allowed a time travel and thanks to mathematics that is something
extra-ordinary in itself.
 
Now I will be more logical and ask myself the following question:
 
Is there any contradiction in my evidence since a car
is not a machine to allow time travel in the future to
the simple reason that the regions where we will travel and arrive
faster with a car will not have aged in time that corresponds to the
future time in which one arrives by the feet?
 
I answer this in a more logical way:
 
Notice that when I said that the mathematical equation
of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is a time travel machine
that permits to travel in the future, because it is an equation that
also predicts the result more quickly to which one arrives by paper
without this equation, so the time has no hold on the theoretical result
that is predicted faster so that there is no contradiction when it comes
to theoretical prediction. Also when you use this invention That is this
mathematical equation of the arithmetic series: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2),
it is that you are living the future of the one who has not yet
invented or used this equation and who will arrive there in its future,
therefore it is for this reason that this equation is also a time travel
machine that permits to travel in the future and it has a predictive
characteristic.
 
So there is no contradiction and therefore we can
consider a car as a time traveling machine to travel in the future, like
the microprocessor, and like several other mathematical inventions
as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series.
 
Here is one of my conclusion:
 
If you are traveling from Montreal to Paris
by airplane, and that another person swims and walk
by foot to Paris, and assume that the person who moves by swiming
and walking wants to see Paris and answer some questions,
And if you travel to Paris by plane and you
answer these questions more quickly since you are going to see Paris
more quickly than the person swimming and and walking , so that
has a predictive character as the mathematical equation of the
arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), since you will be able
to send an email quickly to the person who wants to
to swim and walk to Paris and give him
the answers he's looking for, so you'll be able to see
the answers of his future, and this predictive characteristic
can be considered as a time travel machine that permits to travel in the
future,
so the aircraft and the car are like time travel machines that permit to
travel in the future ... as well as the processors and other
mathematical inventions and others...
 
 
Rationality and logic also have a predictive characteristic,
so you must also reason better in a more scientific manner and take into
account the scientific and empirical evidence to
be ahead of others, like a time machine that permits to travel in the
future..
 
If a first person receives a valuable advice and this advice
of value allows him to better control his future and to succeed in his
life in the future by executing this valuable advice and also it allows
him to predict his future, and besides, imagine that a second person
will receive in its future this valuable advice, then the first person
will be able to guess with CERTITUDE the future of the second person
which will be the consequence of the execution of this valuable advice ,
and not only the first person will have lived the future of the second
person before the second person, since the two will have lived the same
event by the execution of this valuable advice, then in my opinion we
must reason as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic and
notice that since the first person will guess with CERTITUDE
The future of the second person and will also live the future event of
the second person, then those two theoretical and
empirical evidences confirms that the first person has lived the future
event of the second person, so this valuable advice could be called by
mathematical approximation a time machine that permits to travel in the
future, I say "approximation", because we by analogy are as in fuzzy
logic rather than in boolean logic, in addition to that, that the fact
that the first person guesses with CERTITUDE the future of the second
person, this informs in a logical manner that this certainty change our
way of perceiving, for this certainty, even if
it is not travel in the future, it is by approximation
as a journey into the future, for a journey into the future
will lead to the same certainty, and as a result
the same certainties permit us to affirm by approximation
that the valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel
in the future.
 
Then you understand that I am also a Platonist,
Because you noticed that I can define this time travel in the future as
a platonic event, so when i said that a valuable advice is a time
machine that permits to travel in the future, you understand that it
makes us live platonically the future of others, and since I am a also
Platonist, I affirm that a valuable advice is a time travel machine
that permits us to travel in the future of others since time has no hold
on the ideas, and that the same idea through time inside two
persons, is the same idea, therefore my proof is made that the valuable
advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future.
 
When you imagine a circle, I asserts that not only can you imagine the
circle in material or matter but also in immaterial, as was my proof
that I have just given you , this immaterial essence of the idea is
reified by our reason, and that is the reason that gives it existence.
So this in my opinion is sufficient proof that the idea exists because
we feel it by our reason and it pays homage to our beloved philosopher
Plato.
 
It is this reification of the immaterial essence of the idea
by reason which gives the necessary and even sufficient approximation to
call even a valuable advice a time machine that permits to travel in the
future.
 
Then since the idea exists and since a sensation also exists,
then one can not also distinguish an idea from the generated sensation
by the execution as an automaton of a valuable advice at a time t1 and a
time t1 + t2, and since an idea does not age then we can affirm that
valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the
future, and the valuable advice has a predictive characteristic, because
the approximation is sufficient since we are not in boolean logic but in
fuzzy logic.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 27 01:01PM -0400

Hello....
 
 
Is China Outsmarting America in A.I.?
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/27/technology/china-us-ai-artificial-intelligence.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Ftechnology&action=click&contentCollection=technology®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=3&pgtype=sectionfront
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 27 03:53PM -0400

Hello............
 
 
Can we travel back in time?
 
Here is my thoughts that i have just wrote:
 
It is a very interesting question that demands rationality
and logical thinking to answer it ...
 
To answer it, i start from a mathematical subject which is the
mathematical arithmetic series.
 
An arithmetic series has as its main characteristic that
the difference between its terms is constant ... and that its sum
gives (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), a_n being the last term ... now you have
to be smart and notice with me that just before the final step of the
final calculation that resulted as a general equation of the arithmetic
series, the calculation of the arithmetic series required of us a much
bigger time to solve the series .. But as soon as the result (a_n * (a_n
+ 1)) / 2 has been reached, the time for the resolution of the
arithmetic series has greatly diminished, therefore the time preceding
the resolution has compressed a lot and allowed us to travel in the the
future quickly, the resolution of the arithmetic series which gave: (a_n
* (a_n + 1)) / 2), it's like a wormhole in the universe permit us to
time travel in the future more quickly, but understand with me that the
time travel in the future that allows you to make the equation of (a_n *
(a_n + 1)) / 2) is relative to the time taken previously by the
arithmetic series just before the discovery of the equation (a_n * (a_n
+ 1)) / 2), and thus that the universe is computable and that ultimately
it allowed a time travel and thanks to mathematics that is something
extra-ordinary in itself.
 
Now I will be more logical and ask myself the following question:
 
Is there any contradiction in my evidence since a car
is not a machine to allow time travel in the future to
the simple reason that the regions where we will travel and arrive
faster with a car will not have aged in time that corresponds to the
future time in which one arrives by the feet?
 
I answer this in a more logical way:
 
Notice that when I said that the mathematical equation
of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is a time travel machine
that permits to travel in the future, because it is an equation that
also predicts the result more quickly to which one arrives by paper
without this equation, so the time has no hold on the theoretical result
that is predicted faster so that there is no contradiction when it comes
to theoretical prediction. Also when you use this invention That is this
mathematical equation of the arithmetic series: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2),
it is that you are living the future of the one who has not yet
invented or used this equation and who will arrive there in its future,
therefore it is for this reason that this equation is also a time travel
machine that permit to travel in the future and it has a predictive
characteristic.
 
So there is no contradiction and therefore we can
consider a car as a time traveling machine to travel in the future, like
the microprocessor, and like several other mathematical inventions
as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series.
 
Here is one of my conclusion:
 
If you are traveling from Montreal to Paris
by airplane, and that another person swims and walk
by foot to Paris, and assume that the person who moves by swiming
and walking wants to see Paris and answer some questions,
And if you travel to Paris by plane and you
answer these questions more quickly since you are going to see Paris
more quickly than the person swimming and and walking , so that
has a predictive character as the mathematical equation of the
arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), since you will be able
to send an email quickly to the person who wants to
to swim and walk to Paris and give him
the answers he's looking for, so you'll be able to see
the answers of his future, and this predictive characteristic
can be considered as a time travel machine that permits to travel in the
future,
so the aircraft and the car are like time travelmachines that permit to
travel in the future ... as well as the processors and other
mathematical inventions and others...
 
 
Rationality and logic also have a predictive characteristic,
so you must also reason better in a more scientific manner and take into
account the scientific and empirical evidence to
be ahead of others, like a time machine that permiet to travel in the
future..
 
If a first person receives a valuable advice and this advice
of value allows him to better control his future and to succeed in his
life in the future by executing this valuable advice and also it allows
him to predict his future, and besides, imagine that a second person
will receive in its future this valuable advice, then the first person
will be able to guess with CERTITUDE the future of the second person
which will be the consequence of the execution of this valuable advice ,
and not only the first person will have lived the future of the second
person before the second person, since the two will have lived the same
event by the execution of this valuable advice, then in my opinion we
must reason as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic and
notice that since the first person will guess with CERTITUDE
The future of the second person and will also live the future event of
the second person, then those two theoretical and
empirical evidences confirms that the first person has lived the future
event of the second person, so this valuable advice could be called by
mathematical approximation a time machine that permits to travel in the
future, I say "approximation", because we by analogy are as in fuzzy
logic rather than in boolean logic, in addition to that, that the fact
that the first person guesses with CERTITUDE the future of the second
person, this informs in a logical manner that this certainty change our
way of perceiving, for this certainty, even if
it is not travel in the future, it is by approximation
as a journey into the future, for a journey into the future
will lead to the same certainty, and as a result
the same certainties permit us to affirm by approximation
that the valuable advice is a time machine that permit us to travel
in the future.
 
Then you understand that I am also a Platonist,
Because you noticed that I can define this time travel in the future as
a platonic event, so when i said that a valuable advice is a time
machine that permiets to travel in the future, you understand that it
makes us live platonically the future of others, and since I am a also
Platonist, I affirm that a valuable advice is a time travel machine
that permiet us to travel in the future of others since time has no hold
on the ideas, and that the same idea through time inside two
persons, is the same idea, therefore my proof is made that the valuable
advice is a time machine that permiet us to travel in the future.
 
When you imagine a circle, I asserts that not only can you imagine the
circle in material or matter but also in immaterial, as was my proof
that I have just given you , this immaterial essence of the idea is
reified by our reason, and that is the reason that gives it existence.
So this in my opinion is sufficient proof that the idea exists because
we feel it by our reason and it pays homage to our beloved philosopher
Plato.
 
It is this reification of the immaterial essence of the idea
by reason which gives the necessary and even sufficient approximation to
call even a valuable advice a time machine that permit to travel in the
future.
 
Then since the idea exists and since a sensation also exists,
then one can not also distinguish an idea from the generated sensation
by the execution as an automaton of a valuable advice at a time t1 and a
time t1 + t2, and since an idea does not age then we can affirm that
valuable advice is a time machine that permit us to travel in the
future, and the valuable advice has a predictive characteristic, because
the approximation is sufficient since we are not in boolean logic but in
fuzzy logic.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 27 03:42PM -0400

Hello........
 
 
Can we travel back in time?
 
He is my thoughts that i have just wrote:
 
It is a very interesting question that demands rationality
and logical thinking to answer it ...
 
To answer it, i start from a mathematical subject which is the
mathematical arithmetic series.
 
An arithmetic series has as its main characteristic that
the difference between its terms is constant ... and that its sum
gives (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), a_n being the last term ... now you have
to be smart and notice with me that just before the final step of the
final calculation that resulted as a general equation of the arithmetic
series, the calculation of the arithmetic series required of us a much
bigger time to solve the series .. But as soon as the result (a_n * (a_n
+ 1)) / 2 has been reached, the time for the resolution of the
arithmetic series has greatly diminished, therefore the time preceding
the resolution has compressed a lot and allowed us to travel in the the
future quickly, the resolution of the arithmetic series which gave: (a_n
* (a_n + 1)) / 2), it's like a wormhole in the universe permit us to
time travel in the future more quickly, but understand with me that the
time travel in the future that allows you to make the equation of (a_n *
(a_n + 1)) / 2) is relative to the time taken previously by the
arithmetic series just before the discovery of the equation (a_n * (a_n
+ 1)) / 2), and thus that the universe is computable and that ultimately
it allowed a time travel and thanks to mathematics that is something
extra-ordinary in itself.
 
Now I will be more logical and ask myself the following question:
 
Is there any contradiction in my evidence since a car
is not a machine to allow time travel in the future to
the simple reason that the regions where we will travel and arrive
faster with a car will not have aged in time that corresponds to the
future time in which one arrives by the feet?
 
I answer this in a more logical way:
 
Notice that when I said that the mathematical equation
of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is a time travel machine
that permits to travel in the future, because it is an equation that
also predicts the result more quickly to which one arrives by paper
without this equation, so the time has no hold on the theoretical result
that is predicted faster so that there is no contradiction when it comes
to theoretical prediction. Also when you use this invention That is this
mathematical equation of the arithmetic series: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2),
it is that you are living the future of the one who has not yet
invented or used this equation and who will arrive there in its future,
therefore it is for this reason that this equation is also a time travel
machine that permit to travel in the future and it has a predictive
characteristic.
 
So there is no contradiction and therefore we can
consider a car as a time traveling machine to travel in the future, like
the microprocessor, and like several other mathematical inventions
as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series.
 
Here is one of my conclusion:
 
If you are traveling from Montreal to Paris
by airplane, and that another person swims and walk
by foot to Paris, and assume that the person who moves by swiming
and walking wants to see Paris and answer some questions,
And if you travel to Paris by plane and you
answer these questions more quickly since you are going to see Paris
more quickly than the person swimming and and walking , so that
has a predictive character as the mathematical equation of the
arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), since you will be able
to send an email quickly to the person who wants to
to swim and walk to Paris and give him
the answers he's looking for, so you'll be able to see
the answers of his future, and this predictive characteristic
can be considered as a time travel machine that permits to travel in the
future,
so the aircraft and the car are like time travelmachines that permit to
travel in the future ... as well as the processors and other
mathematical inventions and others...
 
 
Rationality and logic also have a predictive characteristic,
so you must also reason better in a more scientific manner and take into
account the scientific and empirical evidence to
be ahead of others, like a time machine that permiet to travel in the
future..
 
If a first person receives a valuable advice and this advice
of value allows him to better control his future and to succeed in his
life in the future by executing this valuable advice and also it allows
him to predict his future, and besides, imagine that a second person
will receive in its future this valuable advice, then the first person
will be able to guess with CERTITUDE the future of the second person
which will be the consequence of the execution of this valuable advice ,
and not only the first person will have lived the future of the second
person before the second person, since the two will have lived the same
event by the execution of this valuable advice, then in my opinion we
must reason as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic and
notice that since the first person will guess with CERTITUDE
The future of the second person and will also live the future event of
the second person, then those two theoretical and
empirical evidences confirms that the first person has lived the future
event of the second person, so this valuable advice could be called by
mathematical approximation a time machine that permits to travel in the
future, I say "approximation", because we by analogy are as in fuzzy
logic rather than in boolean logic, in addition to that, that the fact
that the first person guesses with CERTITUDE the future of the second
person, this informs in a logical manner that this certainty change our
way of perceiving, for this certainty, even if
it is not travel in the future, it is by approximation
as a journey into the future, for a journey into the future
will lead to the same certainty, and as a result
the same certainties permit us to affirm by approximation
that the valuable advice is a time machine that permit us to travel
in the future.
 
Then you understand that I am also a Platonist,
Because you noticed that I can define this time travel in the future as
a platonic event, so when i said that a valuable advice is a time
machine that permiets to travel in the future, you understand that it
makes us live platonically the future of others, and since I am a also
Platonist, I affirm that a valuable advice is a time travel machine
that permiet us to travel in the future of others since time has no hold
on the ideas, and that the same idea through time inside two
persons, is the same idea, therefore my proof is made that the valuable
advice is a time machine that permiet us to travel in the future.
 
When you imagine a circle, I asserts that not only can you imagine the
circle in material or matter but also in immaterial, as was my proof
that I have just given you , this immaterial essence of the idea is
reified by our reason, and that is the reason that gives it existence.
So this in my opinion is sufficient proof that the idea exists because
we feel it by our reason and it pays homage to our beloved philosopher
Plato.
 
It is this reification of the immaterial essence of the idea
by reason which gives the necessary and even sufficient approximation to
call even a valuable advice a time machine that permit to travel in the
future.
 
Then since the idea exists and since a sensation also exists,
then one can not also distinguish an idea from the generated sensation
by the execution as an automaton of a valuable advice at a time t1 and a
time t1 + t2, and since an idea does not age then we can affirm that
valuable advice is a time machine that permit us to travel in the
future, and the valuable advice has a predictive characteristic, because
the approximation is sufficient since we are not in boolean logic but in
fuzzy logic.
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18 <coco@coco.com>: May 27 01:30PM -0400

Hello...........
 
 
Pretty Soon Electric Cars Will Cost Less Than Gasoline
 
Read more here:
 
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-26/electric-cars-seen-cheaper-than-gasoline-models-within-a-decade
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)