- Cloud projects - 2 Updates
- comp.lang.c++.moderated status - 7 Updates
- Piss - 1 Update
- neoGFX: the ultimate C++ GUI library -- coming soon - 1 Update
- "C++17 Is Now Official" - 1 Update
- The rapture - 1 Update
- Sequencing of "<<" - 1 Update
- [oft] from blocking to nonblocking server - 1 Update
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Dec 13 07:05PM > Brian > Ebenezer Enterprises - Enjoying programming again. > http://webEbenezer.net Brian, if you are going to advertise your website then don't attempt to thinly disguise it as a post apparently about something else as that is more irritating than a straight advert. /Flibble -- "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| woodbrian77@gmail.com: Dec 13 03:19PM -0800 On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 1:05:59 PM UTC-6, Mr Flibble wrote: > Brian, if you are going to advertise your website then don't attempt to > thinly disguise it as a post apparently about something else as that is > more irritating than a straight advert. I was interested in cloud computing prior to starting a company and that interest continues to this day. Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust. http://webEbenezer.net |
| Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk>: Dec 07 02:30PM On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 06:15:16 -0800 (PST) > On Thursday, December 7, 2017 at 8:34:24 AM UTC-5, Öö Tiib wrote: [snip] > I recognize that's how people view it, but it's not that. They are > repulsed by Jesus, by His condemnation of their sin. It is > transferred onto me as the messenger of that message. No, people are repulsed by you and your behaviour. Most religious people are already well aware of their shortcomings. Sadly, you are not. |
| scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Dec 07 04:17PM >A tree is known by its fruit. The outer behavior of the man reveals >his inner heart condition, and explicitly his regard to Jesus Christ, >and sin. Judge not, lest ye be judged. Asshole. |
| David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>: Dec 07 02:39PM +0100 On 07/12/17 13:37, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >> We do understand... > You are not the only readers / regulars in clc++. The message is > given for those who will hear, not those who won't. /Nobody/ here - or in any of the other technical newsgroups - wants to hear your "message". Some readers are atheists or agnostics - they are not interested in your cult. Some are Christians - they will stay Christians, and not join your cult. Others have different religions - they will not join your cult. In all the years I have seen you post this drivel, I have only seen two or three people reply positively to your religious "messages". Invariably these are people that don't know you, have not seen your behaviour, and have misunderstood you. Let us assume, for the sake of argument, that there really is someone out there who might be interested in your "everyone but Rick is possessed by the Devil" cult, and is willing to worship you and praise you for your humbleness. Do you really think they have failed to get the idea after your first 100 messages - but will suddenly "see the light" on message 101 ? Now, I welcome your C++ related posts as much as I welcome any other on-topic post. But if ever there is a moderated group made here, you can be confident that you will be the first person banned - unless you change your posting habits. |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Dec 08 07:46PM On 08/12/2017 19:44, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > The cadence with which I've rolled out posts over the years is like > that of a weekly church service, with the occasional Bible Study in > there as well. Just. Fuck. Off. /Flibble -- "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Dec 08 03:24PM On 08/12/2017 14:57, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >> Rick C. Hodgin ... should be automatically added to the c.l.c++.m >> moderation killfile. > I do not post religious messages to moderated lists. You can verify You conveniently snipped part of that post so I will repeat the message here: You should be banned from moderated newsgroups due to your off-topic spamming of the non-moderated equivalents of those newsgroups (such as this newsgroup). Saying you don't spam moderated newsgroups isn't saying much because the spam wouldn't get past the moderation anyway. I hope you mean what you say and that you have finished spamming this newsgroup. Either way: piss off mate. [snip;tldr] /Flibble |
| fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>: Dec 13 06:21AM -0800 W dniu wtorek, 12 grudnia 2017 22:26:11 UTC+1 użytkownik Vir Campestris napisał: > > Too bad that there is no standard for that. > I believe uk.legal.moderated operate such a system. > Andy dont make moderated group: just make another group with options to ban hodgin ramine and this kind regular bulk spammers and not toy with any other kind of moderation |
| fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>: Dec 13 06:33AM -0800 W dniu środa, 13 grudnia 2017 15:22:09 UTC+1 użytkownik fir napisał: > > Andy > dont make moderated group: > just make another group with options to ban hodgin ramine and this kind regular bulk spammers and not toy with any other kind of moderation note otherwise all probably know how it would end: some programming medicores will grasp for moderation, then all people who not share a point of view that those new 'glorious moderators' (which are in fact simple medicores) are so glorious will become banned by this medicores becouse they will felt in rgiht to ban their opponents it always just end this way - i seen it enough times.. some call it 'anal retentive' moderators (if i remember this naming correctli, i seen when better more knowledgable and intelligent people was banned by medicores just becouse thise inteligent ones dont respected moedicore moderators as beinh higher than that (in opinions, feel of the rules, feel what is good what is right).. more to say even myself (i am a moderator in some places, feelt and urge to ban some people who i just dsliked, (eben though i think i got in fact better feel for human rights, 'constitution' and overall open attitude) - its just human nature even if moderator is higher kind of persons, usually people are only medicore) this leads me to conclusion thet only massive evident spammers should be banned and there should be no personal based moderation) |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Dec 08 02:05PM On 07/12/2017 19:09, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: > Hi, my name is Rick C. Hodgin and in-between my several daily sessions > of jerking off to an image of a naked Jesus Christ I drink my own piss. Why do I do this you ask? Well Jesus Christ is cute and has a huge cock and God told me that my piss undergoes transubstantiation when I urinate turning into the Piss of Christ (holy water). -- Thank you, Rick C. Hodgin |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Dec 08 08:01PM Hi, neoGFX progress update: New GUI-related feature: You can now specify using a size policy that a widget maintains an aspect ratio when laid out; this is an important feature that the most popular neoGFX competitor (its name begins with a 'Q' and ends in a 't') doesn't provide. New game related features: Red black AABB tree for broad phase collision detection implemented. 2D/3D meshes now support multiple texture atlas sub-textures. v1.0 of neoGFX should be out next summer. -- "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Dec 08 06:56PM On 07/12/2017 23:29, jacobnavia wrote: > esoteric features that to master them all several lifes are necessary. > Sorry I have only one, impossible to waste it learning all those 1605 > pages. The only people who need to learn all those 1605 pages are people who contribute to the Standard itself and even then you can probably specialize and concentrate on a subset. You don't need to remember all the member functions std::basic_string has in order to use it effectively as you can always refer to your favourite reference book or Google it (cppreference.com is great). IDE auto-complete/intellisense can also be a great help. /Flibble |
| "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Dec 08 06:02PM The rapture will happen soon; the last ones didn't happen because reasons. -- Thank you, Rick C. Hodgin |
| Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu>: Dec 07 07:12AM -0800 > think. The standard gives as an example 'B b[2] = { B(), B() };', > about which it says "full-expression is the entire initialization > including the destruction of temporaries" This example was added for C++17, reflecting a change in the definition of full-expression for C++17. That definition now includes as one alternative an init-declarator (Clause 11) or a mem-initializer (15.6.2), including the constituent expressions of the initializer |
| "Fred.Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@KVI.nl>: Dec 07 08:49AM +0100 "fir" schreef in bericht news:cd8a5b40-e4ed-4f13-b0d7-0fefe3d7d16f@googlegroups.com... >for a code snipped for firing non-blocking connect on client side >(some 2h of slow googling and reading dont show me that snippet, does >anybody maybe have that? tnx) Why do you need non-blocking connect? It usually causes code that is difficult to read, because it is not sequential. C++ makes it easy to create a separate thread to make the connection, so that other threads can continue to do their work. It is no problem if a separate thread blocks. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment