Sunday, December 17, 2017

Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 6 updates in 2 topics

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>: Dec 17 07:26AM -0500

Vir Campestris wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
 
>> about the validity of that.
 
> I wouldn't be. But they are using job postings to determine _demand_
> which seems pretty reasonable.
 
Sometimes one has to leave on project and join another.
 
I've had to do a lot of Javascript lately. A nifty language in some ways,
but hell to debug, and I am not allowed to use jQuery (because it supposedly
slows things wayyyy down... but maybe its because of Windows Server :-)
 
The same with C#. I still great prefer C++. I think C#'s overloading of
"." to be a scoping operator (like C++'s "::") and its use of "properties"
greatly detract from the comprehensibility of C# code. And those freaking
containers! Talk about your FAT INTERFACES!!! How many freaking member
functions... er, I mean, methods, does a class need?
 
And the occasional "zoning out" of web applications while they clean up
the garbage.
 
And last, but not least, Visual Studio not hitting Javascript breakpoints,
unceremoniously stopping the web app, IIS Express crashing...
 
I thought this stuff was supposed to be RAD. Not even close.
 
--
Debian Hint #9: If you need to know what version of Debian you're currently
running, look in /etc/debian_version or use 'lsb_release -sc' command. If you
want to know the codename for that version (for example, 5.0 is codenamed
'Lenny'), check this URL:
 
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-ftparchives.html#s-codenames
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>: Dec 17 07:29AM -0500

Jerry Stuckle wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
 
 
>> Lynn
 
> Not valid at all. Job postings favor jobs with high turnover rates.
> Stable jobs don't rate very high in such a survey.
 
Good point.
 
A guy I know has spent the latter part of his career jumping from job to
job, always doing the same kinds of projects.
 
It's apparently a great way to leverage a good pay increase every year or
so, if you find the right locus of projects :-*
 
 
--
You love your home and want it to be beautiful.
James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net>: Dec 17 02:57PM -0500

On 12/17/2017 07:29 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
...
> job, always doing the same kinds of projects.
 
> It's apparently a great way to leverage a good pay increase every year or
> so, if you find the right locus of projects :-*
 
True, but risky. I once knew a guy who did just that, but his last
high-paying job was funded only because of the political power of a
particular high-ranking official in a foreign country. When that
official lost a political fight, his project lost its funding, and he
couldn't find anyone else willing to pay him anywhere near as much as
they had been paying him. In principle, he could restart the process,
but that hasn't worked very well - partly because the Great Recession
intervened.
woodbrian77@gmail.com: Dec 16 04:54PM -0800

On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 10:24:52 PM UTC-6, Öö Tiib wrote:
 
> > What new cloud projects are you working on in C++?
 
> We can't typically tell you about works in progress since there
> is typically NDA.
 
I keep in mind individuals and small companies.
 
> There are no "cloud computing".
 
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=cloud+computing&t=ffsb&atb=v92-7_b&ia=web
 
It's common terminology from what I can tell.
 
 
Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises
http://webEbenezer.net
woodbrian77@gmail.com: Dec 16 05:06PM -0800


> > There are no "cloud computing".
 
> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=cloud+computing&t=ffsb&atb=v92-7_b&ia=web
 
> It's common terminology from what I can tell.
 
Merriam Webster has a definition of cloud computing --
but it's not a good one in my opinion. They say the
term goes back to 1996, so that much is helpful.
 
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cloud%20computing
"Öö Tiib" <ootiib@hot.ee>: Dec 17 05:44AM -0800


> > > We can't typically tell you about works in progress since there
> > > is typically NDA.
 
> > I keep in mind individuals and small companies.
 
For small company or individual it is even worse idea to gossip
about innovative work not yet ready.
 
 
> > > There are no "cloud computing".
 
You snipped most of my point. That is false attribution.
 
> but it's not a good one in my opinion. They say the
> term goes back to 1996, so that much is helpful.
 
> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cloud%20computing
 
Dictionaries have been wrong before. "Clouds" and "cloud computing"
are not synonyms to "rented servers" or "internet services" but are
deceptive marketing hype about rented servers and internet services.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No comments: