Monday, March 12, 2018

Digest for comp.lang.c++@googlegroups.com - 10 updates in 4 topics

"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>: Mar 12 10:11AM -0700

Here is some information you can look at taken from around the world
and compiled regarding dinosaurs.
 
Dinosaurs in the Bible (begins at 0:45)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsQIF7Yh3hI&t=0m45s
 
Here's a video related to the evidence of a young Earth. Did you know
there are over 300 flood legends from around the world, and they are
all remarkably similar? One particular one from isolated Hawaii is
almost verbatim the Genesis account, with some of the names being
different, like "Nu nu" for Noah, and so on:
 
Age of the Earth (begins at 0:42)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szBTl3S24MY&t=0m42s
 
And there are many other videos related to other aspects of the Bible
which are taught.
 
--
Rick C. Hodgin
"Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid>: Mar 12 12:57PM -0700

On 3/11/2018 1:10 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> we both see in scientific data.
 
> The Bible teaches 6,000 years since creation, and observable evidence
> corroborates that claim.
 
Wow. How many years ago was Lake Tahoe formed?
 
 
"Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid>: Mar 12 01:00PM -0700

On 3/11/2018 6:24 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
 
>>> The truth is a young Earth around 6,000 years old.
 
>> Even your pastor wouldn't believe that, Rick.
 
> It is the Biblical age.
 
I thought that a day with God is around a thousand years on earth?
 
 
"Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid>: Mar 12 01:14PM -0700

On 3/12/2018 9:59 AM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> never been there, we do not know that for a fact. It's a belief
> based on our own reasoning abilities and things that make sense to
> us, but we do not know.
 
Does the Andromeda Galaxy exist or not Rick! wow.
 
 
> like whatever they do based on wherever we are? Were we to head
> off toward some distant galaxy we'd hit the projection screen in a
> short while of travel.
 
WOW! lol. Please define a "short while of travel".
 
Holy Moly!
 
 
 
"Öö Tiib" <ootiib@hot.ee>: Mar 12 01:35PM -0700

On Monday, 12 March 2018 18:59:35 UTC+2, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> never been there, we do not know that for a fact. It's a belief
> based on our own reasoning abilities and things that make sense to
> us, but we do not know.
 
Scientists measure distances using our understandings of current
Astronomy and Physics. Earth circles around Sun away from it 150
millions kilometers. For example if to take four pictures, at spring
equinox, at midsummer, at autumn equinox and at midwinter then we have
pictures from corners of square around Sun with diagonal 300 millions kilometers. Things look somewhat different from these spots and so we
can estimate distances and speeds of all things we see quite accurately.
It was just an example. In reality we are not limiting ourselves to 4
pictures but observing everything constantly in all directions, from
orbit and from ground.
What have those observations to do with faith? Most of those are done
by fully automatic telescopes working 24/7. Everything is
where it should be whatever high accuracy equipment we use.
 
> like whatever they do based on wherever we are? Were we to head
> off toward some distant galaxy we'd hit the projection screen in a
> short while of travel.
 
So that is your "correct" cosmology how far Andromeda Galaxy is?
Doesn't that contradict with Bible as well? Or are you just putting
random shit up to escape from a fair question? The telescopes in
my answer would notice that it is just a picture on projection screen
not far away.
 
> etc. We are able, in some small ways, to do what's recorded God did
> in Genesis. How much more so for the real and true God, being how
> much more capable than we are in our finite, flawed existence?
 
That is Omphalos hypothesis, of trickster god who made universe to look
billions years old full with false evidence of everything, including
hundreds of millions years of biological evolution. That is likely
unacceptable explanation for your own pastor as well, so why should I
argue with it? Go discuss it with your pastor.
 
> My point is: You do not know some of the things you assume.
 
If god wanted it that way then why I should not trust that? All the
perfect work was likely made for our own good? Your Bible tells about
it nothing, contradicts with that as well and provides zero reason to
trust it more than the amazing universe what we can observe.
 
> hundreds of years before any of us were born, before any of our beliefs
> and thoughts were formed through our experiences and what not, that it is
> to be summarily dismissed because it contradicts the teachings of our time?
 
Are you sure it was written, may be it is also part of cartoon of yours,
some red herring in it?
 
> and honestly seeking it, for it is then that God sees us seeking and lifts
> us up, depositing us where it is so we are able to find it. Without God
> doing this, we will never find it because of our sin.
 
So reality is Satan's dominion? Was the reality made by god or by devil?
 
> Jesus Christ to show us the light of truth. He operates in spirit, and
> gives us new spiritual life (John 3). He overcomes our flesh and teaches
> us truly and rightly.
 
May be your flesh is owned by devil, for me it does not exist.
All my works, successes and mistakes that I have done I have done and
repaired myself or with aid of other people ... and sure I take full
responsibility of what I have done and do not blame any of it on
paranormal beings. I have told to you that accusing others, real,
supernatural or fictional is on any case not nice and irresponsible.
 
> send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things
> to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
 
> God guides us continually from within toward the things of God.
 
Are you crazy? That is not a god there, it is what was written into a book
by a person who never met with Jesus.
 
> making assumptions. You have not traveled there to know, which makes
> your belief in what you state your own personal form of religion. You
> believe in the religion of naturalism (or whatever you want to call it).
 
I believe into facts that we can observe. It does not matter if these
are facts of reality or facts of simulated reality, the rules by what
it works are reliable like clockwork and have been of great aid in
everyday technologies that we make and use and make our life easier.
On the other hand every year there are some religious doomsday tellers
and these have never been correct but cause some disorder and
misfortune to fools who believed it.
 
> was the earth dried.
 
> One year 10 days from the start of the flood to the Earth being dried to
> more or less what we see today in terms of land masses and what not.
 
So from where did the miles high piles of rocks full of fossils come?
 
 
> Not everything in astronomy, physics, chemistry, geology, biology,
> paleontology evidence is fake. But all of it aligns with the Biblical
> perspective if you begin with the assumption that it is true.
 
How so? You just said that it is simulation of billions years old
universe, so fully fake.
 
> that kind of timescale. We've also seen multiple evidences where
> those same devices have dated things we know to be a certain age at
> ridiculously outrageous ages.
 
Things get contaminated or mixed up by seismic activities and also
humanly mistakes happen but it all is double-checked, found out and
corrected by other members of scientific community. What you said was
that all of it is fake, don't you remember?
 
> Paleontology has demonstrated man's footprints walking with dinosaur
> prints. In South America there are carved stones showing men with
> spears surrounding dinosaurs.
 
Ok, those are indeed from some sort of parody news like from theonion
that you sometimes post as real.
 
> to immediate scorn when it's presented, so that it's labeled only as
> those "crazy people" or the "tin foil hat brigade" who would believe
> such things.
 
It is often put up as mockery at first place. To make joke about those
gullible who believe and cite it. That is the difference with science
that is carefully made, reviewed and verified by people who have some
pride left and all you flatearth, ancient astronaut, biblical
literalist and whatever other mad conspiracy theory kooks there are
who discard fair work of good people and put up their awful made up
nonsense as alternative.
 
> But it's there, because God has promised that truth would always re-
> main, even until the end of the Earth.
 
You should be consistent if there is true world or there are only
simulations, illusions and cheap projection screens to hit. It can't
be both ways.
I have chosen to trust reality since it works and discard lunatic
stories of kooks since these don't help anyone. Yes, kook stories
indeed cause evil, make people to blow them up or to burn others
on stake. Disgusting.
Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>: Mar 12 09:12PM


> On Sunday, March 11, 2018 at 8:35:32 PM UTC-4, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
 
>> The truth is a young Earth around 6,000 years old.
 
> Even your pastor wouldn't believe that, Rick.
 
The Vatican certainly doesn't - in fact, their astronomer considers such
a belief "almost blasphemous". But Rick would tell you they're the
wrong sort of Christian, because they're not the mouth-breathing redneck kind.
A Google User <indhumg@gmail.com>: Mar 12 12:39PM -0700

Hi All,
 
Is there anybody who can work on freelance basis ? i have a project.
 
 
Regards,
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com>: Mar 12 01:48PM -0500

On 3/10/2018 9:14 PM, Louis Krupp wrote:
> CrudeGroup::dataTransferItemsToDIIW will make any difference. The code
> you posted is legal either way.
 
> Louis
 
Yes, you are correct. I need the compiler to flag this code for me to
fix when I changed the function of the method dataTransferItemsToDIIW:
 
DataItem * anObject = crudeGroup -> dataTransferItemsToDIIW (key);
 
I have several classes that I need to fix:
 
C:\dii\deswin\classes>grep dataTransferItemsToDIIW *.h
compregr.h: virtual DataItem * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
comsplgr.h: virtual DataItem * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
crudegro.h: virtual ObjPtr * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
datagrou.h: virtual ObjPtr * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key,
DataGroup ** theDataItemOwner);
disgroup.h: virtual ObjPtr * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key,
DataGroup ** theDataItemOwner) override;
divgroup.h: virtual DataItem * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
expgroup.h: virtual DataItem * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
flashgro.h: virtual DataItem * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
gengroup.h: virtual DataItem * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
hx1group.h: virtual DataItem * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
hx2group.h: virtual DataItem * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
linegrou.h: virtual DataItem * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
muldivgr.h: virtual DataItem * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
plureagr.h: virtual DataItem * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
streamgr.h: virtual ObjPtr * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key,
DataGroup ** theDataItemOwner) override;
tankgroup.h: virtual DataItem * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
valvegro.h: virtual DataItem * dataTransferItemsToDIIW (int key);
 
Thanks,
Lynn
legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard): Mar 12 07:37PM

[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
 
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> spake the secret code
 
>Yes, you are correct. I need the compiler to flag this code for me to
>fix when I changed the function of the method dataTransferItemsToDIIW:
 
> DataItem * anObject = crudeGroup -> dataTransferItemsToDIIW (key);
 
IMO, the best way to drive this change is to write tests for the
covariant derived methods and then the compiler will fail when you
attempt to assign Base* to Derived* without a downcast.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org>
The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
Jeff-Relf.Me @.: Mar 11 06:54PM -0700

You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)