Thursday, March 8, 2018

Digest for comp.programming.threads@googlegroups.com - 4 updates in 4 topics

computer45 <computer45@cyber.com>: Mar 07 05:07PM -0500

Hello....
 
 
About nationalism and the future..
 
I think we are making a big mistake, because Donald Trump is like
nationalism that is returning back, but this is inferior thinking,
because science does say that in 12 years or 15 years from now
the world will be different as the difference between now and
year 1750, so since science and technology can become dangerous
so we have to start to think the world differently and far from
nationalism and violence and hate, and start to be more security that
knows how to manage itself
 
Read the following to understand better..
 
It's most intuitive for us to think linearly, when we should be thinking
exponentially
 
"If Kurzweil and others who agree with him are correct, then we may be
as blown away by 2030 as our 1750 guy was by 2015—i.e. the next DPU
might only take a couple decades—and the world in 2050 might be so
vastly different than today's world that we would barely recognize it."
 
Please read this to understand better:
 
https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
 
I think we are making a big mistake, because Donald Trump is like
nationalism that is returning back, but this is inferior thinking,
because science does say that in 12 years or 15 years from now
the world will be different as the difference between now and
year 1750, so since science and technology can become dangerous
so we have to start to think the world differently and far from
nationalism and violence and hate, and start to be more security that
knows how to manage itself
 
Read the following to understand better..
 
It's most intuitive for us to think linearly, when we should be thinking
exponentially
 
"If Kurzweil and others who agree with him are correct, then we may be
as blown away by 2030 as our 1750 guy was by 2015—i.e. the next DPU
might only take a couple decades—and the world in 2050 might be so
vastly different than today's world that we would barely recognize it."
 
Please read this to understand better:
 
https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane,.
computer45 <computer45@cyber.com>: Mar 07 04:22PM -0500

Hello..
 
 
Programming with Design by Contract
 
I think preconditions and postconditions are enough to work with Design
by Contract programming. Using precondition within a software routine
(Client's obligations to the code it calls) and postcondition
(supplier's obligations to the code that uses it).
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
computer45 <computer45@cyber.com>: Mar 07 03:10PM -0500

Hello,
 
Read this:
 
 
Enterprises Can't Get Enough AI Talent
 
Read more here:
 
https://adtmag.com/articles/2018/03/05/ai-talent.aspx
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
computer45 <computer45@cyber.com>: Mar 07 11:49AM -0500

Hello,
 
 
It's most intuitive for us to think linearly, when we should be thinking
exponentially
 
"If Kurzweil and others who agree with him are correct, then we may be
as blown away by 2030 as our 1750 guy was by 2015—i.e. the next DPU
might only take a couple decades—and the world in 2050 might be so
vastly different than today's world that we would barely recognize it."
 
Please read this to understand better:
 
https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html
 
 
 
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane,.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No comments: