- I have just revolutionized computing - 3 Updates
- EXAMPLE - 1 Update
| Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>: Apr 25 07:18PM +0100 On 25/04/2018 01:30, Sky89 wrote: > I have just invented "scalable" LIFO stacks, they > come with different characteristics: blocking and not blocking > and bound and unbound and they are suited for Real-time systems. You haven't invented them; prior art exists. > And i have just invented "scalable" priority FIFO queues, they > come with different characteristics, blocking and not blocking > and bound and unbound and they are suited for Real-time systems. Again you haven't invented them; prior art exists. > I will sell them to Google or/and to Microsoft or/and to other software > companies.. Delusional. /Flibble -- "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say." |
| James Moe <jimoeDESPAM@sohnen-moe.com>: Apr 25 11:31AM -0700 On 04/24/2018 05:30 PM, Sky89 wrote: > I have just revolutionized computing with my following very new > inventions ROTL! -- James Moe jmm-list at sohnen-moe dot com Think. |
| "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com>: Apr 25 10:55PM +0200 On 25.04.2018 20:31, James Moe wrote: >> I have just revolutionized computing with my following very new >> inventions > ROTL! Rolling on the laughter? What? Cheers!, - Alf |
| Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se>: Apr 25 10:27AM On Tue, 2018-04-24, Tim Rentsch wrote: > It was only much later that I realized that many programmers have > learned this not through teaching but only later after years of > experience. That's the way it was for me, I think. It was only implicit in the teaching (which IIRC was mainly about types, and Dijkstra's ideas about proving code correctness). Only marginally related: I remember an interview with Knuth where he noted that the programmer's work is interesting because it spans so many levels of abstraction. One minute you're thinking about user interfaces, the next you are debugging a core dump. But I suppose you must /switch/ between them, not keep them all in your head at once. The code should help the reader to stay at one layer of abstraction at a time. > There isn't any real point to the above reminiscing. I thank > you for the positive comment. /Jorgen -- // Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . . \X/ snipabacken.se> O o . |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment