- About the essence of "intelligence" - 1 Update
- About the essence of racism - 1 Update
- Here is my new thoughts of today about political philosophy.. - 1 Update
| computer45 <computer45@cyber.com>: Apr 05 03:11PM -0400 Hello.. Read this: About the essence of "intelligence" I think you are getting stupid by defining IQ, the definition of IQ does not take into account the right requirements ! Your IQ tests are not correct ! i am more smart to notice it: When IQ tests are testing "logic" and "logical" reasoning they are not testing correctly ! Because in logic and logical reasoning we have two things: being capable of organizing logically, like being more "articulated" "logically", and capable of reasoning logically small IQ tests , this is more expressiveness to be able to feel it, because you will find that some people can solve small logical IQ tests , but can not "organize" more logically and more bigger logically and are not capable of being more "logically" "articulated", they have a defect and this makes them less smart ! i don't think IQ tests are capable of detecting it and measuring it, so your IQ tests are not the correct way of measuring. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
| computer45 <computer45@cyber.com>: Apr 05 02:44PM -0400 Hello.... About the essence of racism I am a white arab, and you have seen me doing political philosophy here, i am also of a type of a gentleman, and i am more serious computer programming, and i have studied more operational research, and i have done more mathematics, i am a more "technical" kind of person, i am like more scientific, so the question of today is what is the essence of racism and how racism must be constrained by morality ? The essence of racism, is the essence of weakness or the essence of imperfection, you don't like people that are inferior or imperfect, this is why you are racism or you are discrimination towards your people or towards others, so how this must be constrained by morality ? I think the problem that we have today is that you are getting racist with arabs, and this is not "morality", because look at me here, i am a gentleman and i am capable of thinking correctly , so you have to distinguish between good or tolerable people and bad people, so you have to distinguish between good or tolerable arabs and bad arabs and not hurt good or tolerable arabs, this is what we call morality, but i am noticing that many are still "inferior" thinking by not making the difference and being more responsable. I will invite you to read my following thinking about political philosophy to understand better my thoughts: Hello.... Here is my new thoughts of today about political philosophy.. Now we know what is quality, quality is the degree of excellence of something.. But what is reliability ? We say in computer science that if we increase the mean time between failures, we increase reliability, but is reliability only increasing the mean time between failures ? i don't think so, because we can say, if we put the reference as being "perfect", that less performance is like a "bug" or a "bad" that "hurts" the system compared to being perfect. So being more performance is being more reliability too, also being less beautifulness can be considered as a state that can make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system that hurts to a certain level, so we can say that being more beautiful is being more reliability, and being less perfection can be considered as a state that can make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system, so perfection is reliability, and perfection is quality, so reliability is quality, but what is morality? i think morality is maximizing the degree of excellence at best , so then morality is quality that too maximizes the degree of quality at best, so from the above we can say that morality is perfection and perfection is reliability and then morality is reliability. This is in accordance with my proof bellow, so since morality is quality and morality is perfection, then how can we avoid extremism of perfection or quality that hurts the system ? i think morality is constrained by people of the system or by Democracy that is the tool to avoid extremism of perfection and quality that hurts. More profond about philosophy now.. I said before that: cleanliness generate morality But what about Donald Trump that said that: Haiti and many african countries are shithole countries. Is Donald Trump "cleanliness" to say so ? You have to understand better "cleanliness", cleanliness is knowing how to "balance" the "requirements", so you have to take into account "security" and be less provocative than Donald Trump, this is why Donald Trump is not the right requirement of "security" to say the above about many african countries and about haiti, because Donald Trump is more "virility" that is more "violent" and that does not balance with the other requirements of "sensibility" and "morality" to be better security. Now i give you another example: Neo-nazism is saying that arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, so they want to discriminate them and to be more violent with them, but this neo-nazism is an immature morality, because we have to know how to transcend it towards a better world that takes into account "usefulness" and "security" and "economy", so this is why the requirements of today is to have a more interconnected economies around the world, even with arabs and with africans, this is because we have to take into account the economic growth of arab and african countries that is for example more attractive for economic investment, also we have to take into account the consumer confidence index globally and locally, so we have to know how to be "respect" towards arabs and africans, and we have also to take into account the "usefulness" of arabs and africans, because many western countries bring arab and african immigrants because they are useful for jobs and because they are also useful for low birth rate of white europeans , and also you have to know, like have said Fordism, how to give the necessary wages to others(even globally) to be able for them to buy your products and services, so i have also proved and said that: cleanliness generate morality, but as i have just explained that "cleanliness" must know how to take into account the right requirements as i said above, and it must know how to balance the "requirements". Read the rest: More precision about philosophy.. We have to get into more "calculations" and more "precision" to understand better, this is what we call also philosophy, so i said before that: == And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness. And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too, and cleanliness generate morality. == Here is my logical proof about: cleanliness generate morality Since morality is all about what is bad and what is good, so a weaker definition of morality is the act of distinguishing between the good and bad, but this is a "weaker" definition, because to be able to distinguish between the good and the bad we have to be more rationality and/or more science, but as i said before that "cleanliness" generate also a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to know how to think better, so by less espressiveness we can say that cleanliness contains the "requirement" of being a more scientific mind, this is like "inherent" to cleanliness, because "cleanliness" needs to be more and more "perfect" so that to avoid the "bad" of imperfection or weakness, so this is why the right requirements are inherent to "cleanliness", so it makes my following affirmation correct and true: cleanliness generate morality Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better: I will get into more philosophy.. As you have noticed i have said that morality is defined as: reliability or by more expressiveness by: performance and reliability. Now to "model" better humans, we have the following: sensibility, morality, rationality, virility, intelligence, and language And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness. And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too, and cleanliness generate morality, Now from "sensibility" we get love and we get security too. And from "rationality" we get a mind that is more rational and more logic. from "virility" we get more performance , but if virility is not "constrained" by the others such as morality and sensibility and rationality, we can get violence and insecurity. I think this is how we can "model" better humans both "genetically" and "culturally". Here is my other new thoughts.. What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure" and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its "essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more "precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ? i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and "reliability", or simply "reliability" that can model morality correctly as i have proved it in my previous post, so the essence of our civilization is the act of coordinating and organizing those advantages and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence "performance" and "reliability", and as a validation of my model, you will notice that we are decentralizing "governance", and each of the decentralized parts of the governance are grouping the "advantages" and trying to minimize the disadvantages of each of us that do the governance , democracy is also the same , because democracy is a system that wants to escape a "local" maximum towards a global maximum like in artificial intelligence, and democracy is doing it by applying itself to selecting the best among the actors of politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of civilization, is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by optimization, as i have just explained to you, so hope you are understanding my new thoughts of today. And about what is the essence of morality, here is again my own post that speaks about it ( i have corrected few typos in it): What is it to be morality ? This is the most important part of our humanity ! I have proved before that performance is inherent to morality, and i have showed also that my definition, and that i have proved, that morality is reliability does show that it ressembles serious computer programming, and to be more expressiveness you see that performance is inherent to reliability , so reliability does model efficiently, and we are feeling it like serious computer programming, because when you define morality like this by "precise" words , you begin to feel our essence and you begin to feel the essence of our humanity ! and you become aware that morality is also being capable and being capable to comprehend ! because this makes us distinguish the essence of morality ! so you have to not be fooled by inferior thinking ! because morality is reliability and reliability is performance too and the application of morality is part of morality , so the case is closed that morality of today must be also scientific disciplines and technical disciplines and morality is the measure of morality that must be reliability and performance in itself ! this is what is amazing ! you have to feel it like this and be responsable about it. Read the rest: From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ? Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is inherent to morality. So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on "performance". I wrote previously this: Is performance inherent to morality ? This is good philosophical question ! This is why you have seen me modeling efficient morality by only one word, by saying and proving that: efficient morality or morality is: Reliability. Or by more expressiveness by saying that: Efficient morality or morality is: Performance and reliability. So this definition that i have proved shows clearly that performance is "inherent" to morality or efficient morality. So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on "performance". Please read the rest of my post to understand better: What is the essence of reliability? Can we model efficient morality without it as being also "performance" ? This is a good philosophical question ! I think the right definition of "reliability" is that of not being "bad". So not being efficient is also being not being good, so reliability can model efficiency, that means performance too. This why also we can define efficient morality by only one word that is: RELIABILITY. Please read all the following to understand better my thoughts: About Wise egoism I have showed that the essence of tolerance is: The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknesses ! and it is an act that is caused by consciousness of our weaknesses or by our weaknesses. So wise egoism dictates to be a "usefulness" or a "utility" to the other because of the essence of tolerance, so this is why we have to be more useful to sell our products or services to others internationally and locally, and this usefulness give rise to consumer confidence index that constrain egoism to be more "tolerance" and more "respect" towards others and constrain it to share more with others. About tolerance.. What is it the essence of tolerance ? Does it has an essence ? It is this what we call philosophy.. When you become more smart you will find the shortest path to the solution.. So i will answer it like this: The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknesses ! and it is an act that is caused by consciousness of our weaknesses or by our weaknesses. Its essence is the same as the essence of "organization" ! We are organizing because of our weaknesses too ! because if we were Gods, the need of organizing as a group will be "much" lesser ! This is the essence of our humanity that is perfection and strongness, and perfection and strongness is also saying that efficient morality is performance and reliability. It is like serious computer programming, you can also model efficient morality with only one word that is: "reliability", but to be more "expressive", i have said that efficient morality is performance and reliability, and you are feeling it when you become a more serious programmer like me. So what is the essence of efficiency? Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance. But what is the essence of reliability? Reliability is the quality of performing consistently well. Does efficiency model correctly portability in software programming ? I think yes because we are this portability because portability is performance of portability that is to be able to run your software in different hardwares or operating systems, and that's i think also performance. And does efficiency or reliability model correctly usability? I think yes. Does "reliability" model correctly beautifulness ? I think more beautifulness can mean a "good" thing, and if it is a good thing , it is not a bug of saying it is a bad thing , so reliability do model beautifulness |
| computer45 <computer45@cyber.com>: Apr 05 12:54PM -0400 Hello, Read this: Here is my new thoughts of today about political philosophy.. Now we know what is quality, quality is the degree of excellence of something.. But what is reliability ? We say in computer science that if we increase the mean time between failures, we increase reliability, but is reliability only increasing the mean time between failures ? i don't think so, because we can say, if we put the reference as being "perfect", that less performance is like a "bug" or a "bad" that "hurts" the system compared to being perfect. So being more performance is being more reliability too, also being less beautifulness can be considered as a state that can make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system that hurts to a certain level, so we can say that being more beautiful is being more reliability, and being less perfection can be considered as a state that can make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system, so perfection is reliability, and perfection is quality, so reliability is quality, but what is morality? i think morality is maximizing the degree of excellence at best , so then morality is quality that too maximizes the degree of quality at best, so from the above we can say that morality is perfection and perfection is reliability and then morality is reliability. This is in accordance with my proof bellow, so since morality is quality and morality is perfection, then how can we avoid extremism of perfection or quality that hurts the system ? i think morality is constrained by people of the system or by Democracy that is the tool to avoid extremism of perfection and quality that hurts. More profond about philosophy now.. I said before that: cleanliness generate morality But what about Donald Trump that said that: Haiti and many african countries are shithole countries. Is Donald Trump "cleanliness" to say so ? You have to understand better "cleanliness", cleanliness is knowing how to "balance" the "requirements", so you have to take into account "security" and be less provocative than Donald Trump, this is why Donald Trump is not the right requirement of "security" to say the above about many african countries and about haiti, because Donald Trump is more "virility" that is more "violent" and that does not balance with the other requirements of "sensibility" and "morality" to be better security. Now i give you another example: Neo-nazism is saying that arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, so they want to discriminate them and to be more violent with them, but this neo-nazism is an immature morality, because we have to know how to transcend it towards a better world that takes into account "usefulness" and "security" and "economy", so this is why the requirements of today is to have a more interconnected economies around the world, even with arabs and with africans, this is because we have to take into account the economic growth of arab and african countries that is for example more attractive for economic investment, also we have to take into account the consumer confidence index globally and locally, so we have to know how to be "respect" towards arabs and africans, and we have also to take into account the "usefulness" of arabs and africans, because many western countries bring arab and african immigrants because they are useful for jobs and because they are also useful for low birth rate of white europeans , and also you have to know, like have said Fordism, how to give the necessary wages to others(even globally) to be able for them to buy your products and services, so i have also proved and said that: cleanliness generate morality, but as i have just explained that "cleanliness" must know how to take into account the right requirements as i said above, and it must know how to balance the "requirements". Read the rest: More precision about philosophy.. We have to get into more "calculations" and more "precision" to understand better, this is what we call also philosophy, so i said before that: == And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness. And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too, and cleanliness generate morality. == Here is my logical proof about: cleanliness generate morality Since morality is all about what is bad and what is good, so a weaker definition of morality is the act of distinguishing between the good and bad, but this is a "weaker" definition, because to be able to distinguish between the good and the bad we have to be more rationality and/or more science, but as i said before that "cleanliness" generate also a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to know how to think better, so by less espressiveness we can say that cleanliness contains the "requirement" of being a more scientific mind, this is like "inherent" to cleanliness, because "cleanliness" needs to be more and more "perfect" so that to avoid the "bad" of imperfection or weakness, so this is why the right requirements are inherent to "cleanliness", so it makes my following affirmation correct and true: cleanliness generate morality Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better: I will get into more philosophy.. As you have noticed i have said that morality is defined as: reliability or by more expressiveness by: performance and reliability. Now to "model" better humans, we have the following: sensibility, morality, rationality, virility, intelligence, and language And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness. And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too, and cleanliness generate morality, Now from "sensibility" we get love and we get security too. And from "rationality" we get a mind that is more rational and more logic. from "virility" we get more performance , but if virility is not "constrained" by the others such as morality and sensibility and rationality, we can get violence and insecurity. I think this is how we can "model" better humans both "genetically" and "culturally". Here is my other new thoughts.. What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure" and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its "essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more "precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ? i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and "reliability", or simply "reliability" that can model morality correctly as i have proved it in my previous post, so the essence of our civilization is the act of coordinating and organizing those advantages and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence "performance" and "reliability", and as a validation of my model, you will notice that we are decentralizing "governance", and each of the decentralized parts of the governance are grouping the "advantages" and trying to minimize the disadvantages of each of us that do the governance , democracy is also the same , because democracy is a system that wants to escape a "local" maximum towards a global maximum like in artificial intelligence, and democracy is doing it by applying itself to selecting the best among the actors of politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of civilization, is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by optimization, as i have just explained to you, so hope you are understanding my new thoughts of today. And about what is the essence of morality, here is again my own post that speaks about it ( i have corrected few typos in it): What is it to be morality ? This is the most important part of our humanity ! I have proved before that performance is inherent to morality, and i have showed also that my definition, and that i have proved, that morality is reliability does show that it ressembles serious computer programming, and to be more expressiveness you see that performance is inherent to reliability , so reliability does model efficiently, and we are feeling it like serious computer programming, because when you define morality like this by "precise" words , you begin to feel our essence and you begin to feel the essence of our humanity ! and you become aware that morality is also being capable and being capable to comprehend ! because this makes us distinguish the essence of morality ! so you have to not be fooled by inferior thinking ! because morality is reliability and reliability is performance too and the application of morality is part of morality , so the case is closed that morality of today must be also scientific disciplines and technical disciplines and morality is the measure of morality that must be reliability and performance in itself ! this is what is amazing ! you have to feel it like this and be responsable about it. Read the rest: From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ? Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is inherent to morality. So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on "performance". I wrote previously this: Is performance inherent to morality ? This is good philosophical question ! This is why you have seen me modeling efficient morality by only one word, by saying and proving that: efficient morality or morality is: Reliability. Or by more expressiveness by saying that: Efficient morality or morality is: Performance and reliability. So this definition that i have proved shows clearly that performance is "inherent" to morality or efficient morality. So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on "performance". Please read the rest of my post to understand better: What is the essence of reliability? Can we model efficient morality without it as being also "performance" ? This is a good philosophical question ! I think the right definition of "reliability" is that of not being "bad". So not being efficient is also being not being good, so reliability can model efficiency, that means performance too. This why also we can define efficient morality by only one word that is: RELIABILITY. Please read all the following to understand better my thoughts: About Wise egoism I have showed that the essence of tolerance is: The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknesses ! and it is an act that is caused by consciousness of our weaknesses or by our weaknesses. So wise egoism dictates to be a "usefulness" or a "utility" to the other because of the essence of tolerance, so this is why we have to be more useful to sell our products or services to others internationally and locally, and this usefulness give rise to consumer confidence index that constrain egoism to be more "tolerance" and more "respect" towards others and constrain it to share more with others. About tolerance.. What is it the essence of tolerance ? Does it has an essence ? It is this what we call philosophy.. When you become more smart you will find the shortest path to the solution.. So i will answer it like this: The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknesses ! and it is an act that is caused by consciousness of our weaknesses or by our weaknesses. Its essence is the same as the essence of "organization" ! We are organizing because of our weaknesses too ! because if we were Gods, the need of organizing as a group will be "much" lesser ! This is the essence of our humanity that is perfection and strongness, and perfection and strongness is also saying that efficient morality is performance and reliability. It is like serious computer programming, you can also model efficient morality with only one word that is: "reliability", but to be more "expressive", i have said that efficient morality is performance and reliability, and you are feeling it when you become a more serious programmer like me. So what is the essence of efficiency? Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance. But what is the essence of reliability? Reliability is the quality of performing consistently well. Does efficiency model correctly portability in software programming ? I think yes because we are this portability because portability is performance of portability that is to be able to run your software in different hardwares or operating systems, and that's i think also performance. And does efficiency or reliability model correctly usability? I think yes. Does "reliability" model correctly beautifulness ? I think more beautifulness can mean a "good" thing, and if it is a good thing , it is not a bug of saying it is a bad thing , so reliability do model beautifulness correctly. And we can generalize and say: Because morality is all about what is bad and what is good, so what is bad is like a bug that causes the system to be bad, so if it is bad, it is like a bug that makes the system not "reliable", and it is related to reliability. This is why i have modeled efficient morality with two words by saying: Efficient morality is performance and reliability, and it is like finding the essence of morality. I said above that: The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknessess ! So the essence of tolerance is related to security, so it is related to reliablity, so "reliability" do model tolerance too. Here is my new and extended post about philosophy and politics.. Yet more precision and more calculations , please follow with me: The essence of Class Struggle An idiot will say that Class Struggle such as of communism is not correct ! But philosophy is not the same , in philosophy you have to be more rigorous like in mathematics ! I will get on more philosophy.. I think the nature of Class Struggle of communism has changed a little bit in the West, i mean Class Struggle of communism has soften, but it is still Class Struggle ! i mean that "Democracy" and "usefulness" or to make yourself a "utility" or to make yourself "useful" are also Class Struggle ! and consumerism do |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment