- Some "girly boys" who couldn't handle PDP-11 assembly. - 4 Updates
- EXAMPLE - 1 Update
- Need help with ODB compilation - 4 Updates
| Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com>: Apr 20 07:59PM -0500 >>> it's only worth 1.65$ billion... losers ! ! >> Jeff, do you post to science groups because you want people to pity you? >I'm pretty sure it's working! Pity and contempt. USENET's Janus mask. -- Goat |
| a.m <.m@nsn.s>: Apr 21 01:33PM -0400 >>> it's only worth 1.65$ billion... losers ! ! >> Jeff, do you post to science groups because you want people to pity you? >I'm pretty sure it's working! Jeff Relf exists only as an example of "worst case scenario." |
| moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney): Apr 21 06:17PM >>> it's only worth 1.65$ billion... losers ! ! >> Jeff, do you post to science groups because you want people to pity you? >I'm pretty sure it's working! Yes, Relf still hasn't learned proper Usenet manners, crossposting an existing thread to unrelated groups. As to last time I saw a PDP-11, yesterday. Sort of. I happen to have a "PDP-11" integrated circuit, a Soviet clone of an F-11 chip. Back from the days where PDP-11s and VAXen were export controlled but the USSR would smuggle them and copy them. |
| Alexander Huszagh <ahuszagh@gmail.com>: Apr 21 11:40AM -0700 On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 12:58:01 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > wrote a little (JavaScript) browser extension called "Discord"; > it's IRC on steroids; popular on Reddit; gamers love it too; > and, get this, it's only worth 1.65$ billion... losers ! ! Last I checked, those "girly" boys include the entire LLVM infrastructure. Middle/mixed-endian is mostly a historical artifact at this point. |
| woodbrian77@gmail.com: Apr 21 07:56AM -0700 On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 2:30:25 PM UTC-5, Ian Collins wrote: > But it doesn't convey the same message. It is the swapping back and > forth between levels of detail that is the heart of the problem. > Tim's phrase hits the nail squarely on the head. Here's more context of what Tim wrote: "In most cases this means the code is crossing too many levels of detail. Trying to cover many levels of detail is a large part of why big functions are hard to understand." He also used the word 'cover' to explain what he was saying. Brian Ebenezer Enterprises http://webEbenezer.net |
| janis@eptron.eu: Apr 20 11:10PM -0700 On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 10:55:30 PM UTC+3, Ian Collins wrote: > headers, which system are you using? > -- > Ian. Ubuntu 17.10 |
| janis@eptron.eu: Apr 20 11:19PM -0700 On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 10:55:30 PM UTC+3, Ian Collins wrote: > headers, which system are you using? > -- > Ian. Btw there is much more of the errors: https://pastebin.com/xjijSwhM So it's a mess |
| Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>: Apr 21 06:20PM +1200 >> The errors you posted could be down to a conflict of system and gcc >> headers, which system are you using? > Ubuntu 17.10 I'm afraid all I can say is something appears to be broken in your install. I suggest you follow it up on an ODB forum, this doesn't look like a c++ language issue. -- Ian. |
| janis@eptron.eu: Apr 21 12:34AM -0700 On Saturday, April 21, 2018 at 9:21:04 AM UTC+3, Ian Collins wrote: > like a c++ language issue. > -- > Ian. Those dudes are like very OLD orsmth. There is no forum and not even a modern issue tracking system :/ |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.lang.c+++unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment