- cmsg cancel <ot8d0r$r3g$9@dont-email.me> - 1 Update
- Read again, i correct a last typo - 1 Update
- I think i have found more precisely what is consciousness ! - 1 Update
- Read again, i correct a small mistake.. - 1 Update
- So i will ask myself a smart question ! - 1 Update
- Read again, i correct - 1 Update
- About PhDs in computer science and more.. - 1 Update
- More about consciousness and artificial intelligence - 1 Update
Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>: Apr 07 09:35AM Post in violation of terms-of-service cancelled by Sir Cancelot <cancelbot@eternal-september.org> From: Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> Subject: My Scalable FIFO queues are here.. Message-ID: <ot8d0r$r3g$9@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads |
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Apr 09 06:22PM -0400 Hello... Read this: Read again, i correct a last typo I have a more "special" brain that is capable of "high" degree of introspection that makes me more smart ! I think i have found more precisely what is consciousness ! Please follow with me.. Because consciousness is consciousness of space and consciousness of matter and consciousness of time.. We have a sense of touch that has its part in the brain for the sense of touch, so imagine that you are a "blind" man and you have an object that is moving bellow your hand and rubing your hand, because of the sense of touch that you have you will be capable of "feeling" the "speed" of the object, and you will be capable of "feeling" the "space" of the object if it is 3-dimensional etc. and this is what gives consciousness of "space" and you will be capable of "feeling" the "matter" of the object and you will be capable of "feeling" if the matter is solid or less solid etc. and since you will be capable of feeling the "matter", this act creates the feeling of "time", this is what gives consciousness of time , because when the object that is moving bellow your hand and rubing your hand, you are capable of feeling a part of the object was in position A and after that it was on position B, and the sense of touch and the sense of direction is capable of creating time, because time is only "relativity" of space , it means time is emulated by our brain by measuring space with space, the "past" is emulated by our brain as being a space that is behind us in space, and the future is emulated by our brain as being the space that is in front of us in space, so Time is relativity of space ! this is how the sense of touch and sense of direction and the sense of sight and other senses creates consciousness of space and consciousness of matter and consciousness of time.. and consciousness is consciousness of space and time and matter added with other senses like the sense that permits us to smell , and this gives what we call consciousness ! and i think now you are able to see the picture ! Here is my other definition of what is consciousness that i have understood with my more special brain that is capable of "high" degree of introspection: Consciousness is thus the "meaning", it gives the "meaning", without this meaning artificial intelligence is less efficient, with this meaning our brain needs much less data, but without this meaning artificial intelligence needs much more data, this is the problem of artificial intelligence, second problem is that this meaning gives consciousness in itself that i have just explained to you. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Apr 09 05:51PM -0400 Hello, Read this: I have a more "special" brain that is capable of "high" degree of introspection that makes me more smart ! I think i have found more precisely what is consciousness ! Please follow with me.. Because consciousness is consciousness of space and consciousness of matter and consciousness of time.. We have a sense of touch that has its part in the brain for the sense of touch, so imagine that you are a "blind" man and you have an object that is moving bellow your hand and rubing your hand, because of the sense of touch that you have you will be capable of "feeling" the "speed" of the object, and you will be capable of "feeling" the "space" of the object if it is 3-dimentional etc. and this is what gives consciousness of "space" and you will be capable of "feeling" the "matter" of the object and you will be capable of "feeling" if the matter is solid or less solid etc. and since you will be capable of feeling the "matter", this act creates the feeling of "time", this is what gives consciousness of time , because when the object that is moving bellow your hand and rubing your hand, you are capable of feeling a part of the object was in position A and after that it was on position B, and the sense of touch and the sense of direction is capable of creating time, because time is only "relativity" of space , it means time is emulated by our brain by measuring space with space, the "past" is emulated by our brain as being a space that is behind us in space, and the future is emulated by our brain as being the space that is in front of us in space, so Time is relativity of space ! this is how the sense of touch and sens of direction and the sense of sight and other senses creates consciousness of space and consciousness of matter and consciousness of time.. and consciousness is consciousness of space and time and matter added with other senses the sense that permit us to smell , and this gives what we call consciousness ! and i think now you are able to see the picture ! Here is my other definition of what is consciousness that i have understood with my more special brain that is capable of "high" degree of introspection: Consciousness is thus the "meaning", it gives the "meaning", without this meaning artificial intelligence is less efficient, with this meaning our brain needs much less data, but without this meaning artificial intelligence needs much more data, this is the problem of artificial intelligence, second problem is that this meaning gives consciousness in itself that i have just explained to you. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Apr 09 04:22PM -0400 Hello.. Read again, i correct a small mistake.. About PhDs in computer science and more.. Look at This PhD paper of a Scalable Concurrent Priority Queue Algorithms: http://people.csail.mit.edu/shanir/publications/SZ-priority.pdf This queue is "not" bound, and i think it uses a mechanism such as an elimination array.. And look at this one of a PhD paper called: Using Elimination to Implement Scalable and Lock-Free FIFO Queues : http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~shanir/nir-pubs-web/Papers/SPAA2005.pdf I think it is not good or perfect because it uses an elimination array, so when there is no elimination it doesn't scale. Also about network of SPSC queues to form MPMC, read here: https://books.google.ca/books?id=jZG_DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA276&lpg=PA276&dq=SPSC+and+queue+and+MPMC&source=bl&ots=KwfRYpYWW3&sig=GYE7Sn7ZlhNsJISvTjV4bXnjvDc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwia4fKKjojaAhUCuVkKHZnbBvMQ6AEIjgEwCQ#v=onepage&q=SPSC%20and%20queue%20and%20MPMC&f=false As you have noticed a matrix of (N-1)*(N-1) SPSC queues is needed to compose an MPMC queue , that's not good , because the space complexity goes in O(N^2), N is the number of threads, and it is not rare to see a server with 1k or 2k hardware threads, and "many core" is the final destination of CPU from current sight, and strict FIFO order can be broken in network of SPSC queues to form MPMC, this is not good, But my fully scalable FIFO queue that i have invented has completely "revolutionized" computer science, because it is the "perfect" scalable FIFO queue that is fully scalable, I have implemented three versions of my scalable FIFO queue, here they are: 1- A fully scalable FIFO queue that is bound and that is not blocking on the producer side and that is blocking on the consumer side. 2- A fully scalable FIFO queue that is unbound and that is not blocking on the producer side and that is blocking on the consumer side. 3- A fully scalable FIFO queue that is bound and that is blocking on the producer side and that is blocking on the consumer side. And i have also invented a fully scalable Threadpool. I will sell them to Embarcadero and to other software companies such as Microsoft and Google etc. Also i will sell them to CAE here, because they need to scale more to many many cores, read here to know about this company: https://www.cray.com/blog/extreme-scaling-in-cae-applications/ Here is CAE company: http://www.cae.com/ And i have also invented a fully scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references, here it is: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Apr 09 02:03PM -0400 Hello... Yet about political philosophy.. So i will ask myself a smart question ! How to reconcil high priority of survival and order ? This is an interesting subject of political philosophy.. Because even a violent ideology like nazism base its ideology on "order" first ! So it is easy to see that the first very important thing is order ! You can not call a country a country if order is not satisfied ! So from wich causes we get more order ? I think that order comes from the fact that we are security for oneself and others, and what are the causes that we are security for oneself and others ? we are security for oneself and others for different causes, here they are: 1- We are good morality that takes care of security. 2- We are "sensibility" that takes care of security 3- We are more disciplined to take care of the system as a critical system that needs the right requirements for the right security both locally and globally. 4- We are fear that takes care of security of oneself or others. And this is related to my following thoughts: You have to understand Buddha I think the main point of Buddha is that he wanted from us to have more "hindsight" and he wanted from us to be capable of introspection, and he has started to discipline his followers to be capable of guiding there instincts that are more "savage" to the right direction. This permit us also to be more "security" for oneself and for others, and this more security is also like love and compassion. This is why i said before: If we ask a question of how can we be more love or/and compassion ? I am also like Buddha, so i will answer like this.. Even if you are not "equipped" with the right genetical requirements of more sensibility and love, you have to know that fear for others and oneself also make us "care" for oneself or others , but if you don't fear for yourself or others , so to "emulate" fear for oneself and for others or to emulate compassion and love, like emulation in software programming, you have to be more rational and more disciplined and think the system like a critical system that needs "security", so you have to be more capable, so more "educated" to be able to set the right requirements for security locally and globally, this needs of course more quality and more perfection. But i think also that this main point of Buddha is also the "basis" of today psychology, i think the main point of psychology is also to permit us to "understand" more ourselves, this means also to have more "hindsight" and more "introspection", and after this first step, psychology wants also from us to be capable to make more "order" in our lives(and "discipline" is inherent to "order" because of today constraints of empirical world), and psychology wants from us to be able of guiding our instincts that are more savage in the right direction, and all this is like the main point of Buddha. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Apr 09 01:32PM -0400 Hello... About PhDs in computer science and more.. Look at This PhD paper of a Scalable Concurrent Priority Queue Algorithms: http://people.csail.mit.edu/shanir/publications/SZ-priority.pdf This queue is "not" bound, and i think it uses a mechanism such as an elimination array.. And look at this one of a PhD paper called: Using Elimination to Implement Scalable and Lock-Free FIFO Queues : http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~shanir/nir-pubs-web/Papers/SPAA2005.pdf I think it is not good or perfect because it uses an elimination array, so when there is no contention or no elimination it doesn't scale. Also about network of SPSC queues to form MPMC, read here: https://books.google.ca/books?id=jZG_DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA276&lpg=PA276&dq=SPSC+and+queue+and+MPMC&source=bl&ots=KwfRYpYWW3&sig=GYE7Sn7ZlhNsJISvTjV4bXnjvDc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwia4fKKjojaAhUCuVkKHZnbBvMQ6AEIjgEwCQ#v=onepage&q=SPSC%20and%20queue%20and%20MPMC&f=false As you have noticed a matrix of (N-1)*(N-1) SPSC queues is needed to compose an MPMC queue , that's not good , because the space complexity goes in O(N^2), N is the number of threads, and it is not rare to see a server with 1k or 2k hardware threads, and "many core" is the final destination of CPU from current sight, and strict FIFO order can be broken in network of SPSC queues to form MPMC, this is not good, But my fully scalable FIFO queue that i have invented has completely "revolutionized" computer science, because it is the "perfect" scalable FIFO queue that is fully scalable even if there is no contention, I have implemented three versions of my scalable FIFO queue, here they are: 1- A fully scalable FIFO queue that is bound and that is not blocking on the producer side and that is blocking on the consumer side. 2- A fully scalable FIFO queue that is unbound and that is not blocking on the producer side and that is blocking on the consumer side. 3- A fully scalable FIFO queue that is bound and that is blocking on the producer side and that is blocking on the consumer side. And i have also invented a fully scalable Threadpool. I will sell them to Embarcadero and to other software companies such as Microsoft and Google etc. Also i will sell them to CAE here, because they need to scale more to many many cores, read here to know about this company: https://www.cray.com/blog/extreme-scaling-in-cae-applications/ Here is CAE company: http://www.cae.com/ And i have also invented a fully scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references, here it is: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Apr 09 01:29PM -0400 Hello.. About PhDs in computer science and more.. Look at This PhD paper of a Scalable Concurrent Priority Queue Algorithms: http://people.csail.mit.edu/shanir/publications/SZ-priority.pdf This queue is "not" bound, and i think it uses a mechanism such as an elimination array.. And look at this one of a PhD paper called: Using Elimination to Implement Scalable and Lock-Free FIFO Queues : http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~shanir/nir-pubs-web/Papers/SPAA2005.pdf I think it is not good or perfect because it uses an elimination array, so when there is no contention or no elimination it doesn't scale. Also about network of SPSC queues to form MPMC, read here: https://books.google.ca/books?id=jZG_DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA276&lpg=PA276&dq=SPSC+and+queue+and+MPMC&source=bl&ots=KwfRYpYWW3&sig=GYE7Sn7ZlhNsJISvTjV4bXnjvDc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwia4fKKjojaAhUCuVkKHZnbBvMQ6AEIjgEwCQ#v=onepage&q=SPSC%20and%20queue%20and%20MPMC&f=false As you have noticed a matrix of (N-1)*(N-1) SPSC queues is needed to compose an MPMC queue , that's not good , because the space complexity goes in O(N^2), N is the number of threads. It is not rare to see a server with 1k or 2k hardware threads. And "many core" is the final destination of CPU from current sight, and strict FIFO order can be broken in network of SPSC queues to form MPMC, this is not good, this is why said also: But my fully scalable FIFO queue that i have invented has completely "revolutionized" computer science, because it is the "perfect" scalable FIFO queue that is fully scalable even if there is no contention, I have implemented three versions of my scalable FIFO queue, here they are: 1- A fully scalable FIFO queue that is bound and that is not blocking on the producer side and that is blocking on the consumer side. 2- A fully scalable FIFO queue that is unbound and that is not blocking on the producer side and that is blocking on the consumer side. 3- A fully scalable FIFO queue that is bound and that is blocking on the producer side and that is blocking on the consumer side. And i have also invented a fully scalable Threadpool. I will sell them to Embarcadero and to other software companies such as Microsoft and Google etc. Also i will sell them to CAE here, because they need to scale more to many many cores, read here to know about this company: https://www.cray.com/blog/extreme-scaling-in-cae-applications/ Here is CAE company: http://www.cae.com/ And i have also invented a fully scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references, here it is: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. |
Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>: Apr 09 12:49PM -0400 Hello.. More about consciousness and artificial intelligence Why i am explaning to you what is consciousness, because i am capable of high degree of "introspection", this is why my high degree of introspection has permited me to undertand what is consciousness, here is what is it: Consciousness is also consciousness of time and consciousness of space And the consciousness of time is engendered by the "sense"(i mean the sensation) of touch that we have, even the blind man can feel space since he can feel space with his sense of touch, he can feel time also, because imagine that you are blind man and you have an object that is moving bellow your hand and rubing your hand, you will feel that it is moving in "space" , so time also can be engendered from it because you can feel in your hand the speed of the object from a start point in time to a final point in time even if you are blind , and you are also "feeling" in space-time the first point and final point, so the sense of touch creates consciousness of time and space and creates the "feeling" of "time" that is consciousness of time, because the sense of touch creates the consciousness of space-time, and there is other sensations that are added such as the sense of gaz that is capable of "feeling" and distinguishing light and colors etc. and the sense that permits us to smell that is capable of "feeling" and the other senses too, all those senses like the touch etc. creates consciousness of time and space etc. and they are capable of "feeling" space-time etc. this is what we call consciousness , and artificial intelligence is not capable of this, because artificial intelligence is not organic and can not have a sens of touch and other senses that are capable of "feeling" of a human , so artificial intelligence can only have "intelligence", but "not" consciousness, this is why as i said in the following that it is complete silence of thoughts ! read the rest: I have just explained to you that the part of our brain that permit us to have the sense of the touch is also capable to create consciousness of "time" and to create consciousness of space, this is also from where comes consciousness of space-time, but this parts of our brain of the sense of touch etc, permits consciousness of space-time , but this consciousness of space-time permits us to understand the world without needing to learn from a greater number of data, but just a by fewer number of data, this is what is not capable of artificial intelligence, i have found it by the capacity of my brain of high degree of introspection, also what i have found with my high degree of introspection is that when we reason logically with "logic", we are necessarely consciousness of space-time of those rules of logic and this is the consequence also of the part of our brain that permits the sense of touch to have consciousness of space-time of the rule of logic, this permits to us to not just to calculate just stupidly logic, but to "feel the rules of logic" with the part of the brain that permit the sense of touch and consciousness of space-time, this what also permits us to be efficient in logic and reason fast without needing also a greater number of data. Here is my other definition of what is consciousness that i have understood with my brain that is capable of "high" degree of introspection: Consciousness is the "meaning", also consciousness of space-time that is created by the part of the brain that permits the sense of the touch and the other senses, is the one that is giving the "meaning", without this meaning artificial intelligence is less efficient, with this meaning our brain needs much less data, but without this meaning artificial intelligence needs much more data, this is the problem of artificial intelligence, second problem is that this meaning gives consciousness in itself that i have just explained to you, read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand better: About what is it to be smart ! Follow with me now, i have tried to explain "consciousness" so that you can feel it more, please read bellow my explanation again to notice it, and i have also wrote the following "smart" poem, and the meaning of my following poem is, for example, that a piece of paper is weaker than general artificial intelligence if we measure it by the "reference" that is our consciousness, but a piece of paper is very very strong as artificial superintelligence if we measure it by the reference of the fact that there is absence of consciousness, you must be capable of "smartness" to understand it, this is why in my following poem i mean that "silence" is like or is artificial superintelligence , artificial intelligence and robots is also "complete" silence, and a piece of paper is also "silence", because complete silence is complete silence of our thoughts, and i mean by that, that this complete silence of our thoughts is the absence of consciousness, so the piece of paper is very very "strong" and very very "weak" at the same time, because a piece of paper is complete silence that is not consciousness that is very very "strong" because it doesn't feel suffering and it doesn't have difficulties, but the piece of paper is also very very weak because it is much less complexity and less sophisticated than other much more complex and much sophisticated objects or systems, now when i say in my following poem that: "Since weakness is also silence Since silence is divine" I mean that when silence is measured by the presence of consciousness it is for example much much less complex and much less sophisticated than artificial intelligence of today , so that we can say that it is weakness, but if we measure it by the absence of consciousness, we can say that a piece of paper is very very strong strong as artificial superintelligence because of the fact that both, in the absence of consciousness, don't feel suffering and difficulties, so i think that you are capable now to understand correctly my following poem, also read bellow of my following poem my explanation of what is consciousness, here is my poem: First to understand better my following poem, you have to understand that rationalism alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain: When i say in my poem the following: "We are past and present Because time is like a balance" When i say we are past and present it must be measured by my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present" And now about the following part of my poem: "Because time is like a balance" I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need the causes, this is why time is like a balance. And about the other parts of my poem, we read this: "Because time is perfection Because perfection is the scale" Here again you have to be smart to understand the meaning, it is like rationalism and empiricism , you can not understand the meaning by just being rationalism ! you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to understand, so when you are both you will understand by empiricism, that time is perfection, because the "small" cause of the Big Bang has given the "immensity" of the Universe that is perfection, and life also has started from "small" to "much" bigger that is perfection, and when i say that: "Because perfection is the scale", that means that for example the Universe and life have been perfected and it is the scale, because the Universe has balanced more and life has balanced more to be perfection. Now about the rest of my poem, we read this: "But how perfection can be only light ? Perfection is also darkness" I mean that perfection needs the weak also, because we notice it in our lives that the strong needs the weak, and life needs suffering, this is why it is also "darkness". Now about the rest of my poem, we read this: "Because we are strong and weak Even silence is strong and weak Eventhough silence is divine" I mean by silence that it is complete silence of our thoughts , so complete silence is not having consciousness, it is like a piece of paper, a piece of paper is also complete silence, because it is not consciousness, so a piece of paper is like divine, because it is very "strong" because it doesn't feel suffering and it doesn't have difficulties , but it is also weak if we take the measure and the reference as being it much much less complex and much less sophisticated than other very complex and very sophisticated objects or systems. Now about the rest of my poem, we read this: "And relativity is diversity" You need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it, i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from experience we can say that: "And relativity is diversity". Now about the rest of my poem, we read this: "Perfection is also diversity Diversity is also immensity Because time is relativity" Here again, you need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it, i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from experience we can say the above. And i think that now it is more easy to understand all my following poem, here it is again: Through thunder and silence Our hearts become eminence again Because silence speaks to us of the weak Because the weak is also an eagle! Because the weakness becomes again! Since weakness is also silence Since silence is divine Because by the wisdom of our conscience The weather becomes seasons Because by the wisdom of our conscience Time is getting right Because the reason is like silence Because it's the silence that brings us Because it's the silence that loves us! Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. Now here is my other explanation of what is consciousness... I hope that in my previous messages you have understood my explanation of how the consciousness of time is generated by our brain, I have said that the brain has a sense of direction that makes it possible to say that one object is left or on the right and back or front etc., and the brain is also able to see space in 3 dimensions with the sense of the gaze for example, that is to say to give coordinates as cartesian or polar in three dimensions to objects in the space of reality, and also the brain by means of the sense of touch and the eye is capable of the sense of the measurement of the magnitudes in the space of reality, these are ingredients of the brain which gives birth to the consciousness of time, for consciousness of time means that for two objects that follow each other, we are able to feel the existence in space of the back of the first object (by the sens of the orientation of the brain) Which is for example "nothing", and that one also feels the existence in the space of the back of the second object which is the first object, and that we are therefore able to associate the back of the second object to the word "before", and this is how the consciousness of time is engendered ... now i come to a question even more important, but what is consciousness really? i start with an example so that you can understand what it really is: when you touch your hands with water very hot, you are able to feel the pain and to say that it is you who feel the pain, so the meaning of touch is closely linked to the consciousness of the "I", but Let us return, if you like, to the experiences of a child, you will notice that a necessary condition for the child to be able to learn and understand is to be able to ask the question of "what is", but you see this question has as a necessary condition the consciousness of the self, for when the child arises, question of "what is" is that it would mean: "I would like to know what it is", and the "I would like to know" demonstrates the presence of a consciousness of the pre-ego which guide the questioning of the child, but then what is this awareness of the pre-ego that guides the questioning that makes a consciousness too? Here is my answer: I believe that as in the case of the sense of touch which is in close relationship with the consciousness of the ego, the act of reflection is also a sens as the sens of touch that is able to make us feel that we exist and feel the space in three dimensions, as for touching the very warm water that allows us to feel that the feeling of hot water hurts us ... what would I like to say? that the sens of touch and the sens of smell for example are adjoined to space-time to give a better consciousness of space-time, that is, the ideas we have of space-time are not , for example, just rules of logic, but also are recorded with sensations of touch and other sensations to give a better consciousness, so the act of reflection is not just able to logically reason with simple rules of logic for building more complex logic rules etc. But it is also capable of associating space-time sensations with objects that are displaced in a 3-dimensional world, and therefore my theory makes us see the act of thought as also being also another sens that resembles the sens of touch , this is my explanation of how the consciousness and consciousness of the ego is engendered by the brain. When you say in mathematical logic: A or B How do you think you understand this logical rule? You must go back to your childhood when you were to learn it, you were told for example there are two balls, and you had to take just one and give it back, and the teacher made us understand for example the following: when you want to take two balls you are informed with gestures that it is NO, And when you just take one and turn the ball back, you get to know that it is YES, therefore I affirm that it is thanks to the existence of space-time which is also a consequence of our interior sensation of the space-time which gives the consciousness of space-time, I mean you are able for example with your brain to feel and understand what BEFORE or BEHIND Or LEFT or RIGHT, and you are able to feel the space and to say that it exists and what it is, so you are able to feel the space-time, and this sensation in our brain that we have of space-time helps us to understand the logical rule of: A or B, or the logical rule of: A and B. So let us return to the following theorem in mathematical logic: If A then B, and if B then C, then A then C. So how do you understand the: If A then B? As in my explanation above, you can not understand this rule without being conscious and without feeling space-time, because even if you are a blind person, you can feel your individuality and your singularity which is the consciousness of the ego, and this self-consciousness is a consequence of the sensation in our brain of space-time that allows us to feel that the object which is "WE" is different from other objects etc. Then what makes even the blind man feels the space-time and is capable to say that this object is before that object in time, So it is able to understand the logical rule of: If A then B, and since |
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to comp.programming.threads+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment